Local Unions Bring Educator Voices Into Fall Planning
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Presidential Election Results
2016 Election Overview The outcome of the 2016 elections has definitely altered the landscape for transportation policy and funding initiatives. From the Presidency down to state legislative races, we face a new legislative dynamic and many new faces. What hasn’t changed: the huge need for resources to increase the nation’s and the state’s investment in the transportation system and bipartisan agreement on that fact. Prior to the outcome of Tuesday’s election we were hearing from candidates on both sides of the aisle that increasing investments in infrastructure was an area of agreement. Candidates for Minnesota’s legislature brought up the need for a comprehensive, long-term transportation funding package over and over again in news stories, candidate profiles and candidate forums. We were hearing more from candidates about transportation than we have in previous election cycles. Voters in other states, made their voices heard by approving ballot initiatives in 22 states that increased and stabilized funding for transportation. As we head into 2017, transportation advocates have a huge opportunity to capitalize on the widespread support for infrastructure improvements. However, it will take the involvement of transportation advocates across the state making their voices heard to rise above partisan squabbling and the many other issues that will be on the table. National Presidential Election Results Electoral Votes Needed to Win: 270 *Remaining: 16 Trump (R) Electoral Votes 290 Popular Vote 60,375,961 Clinton (D) Electoral Votes 232 Popular Vote 61,047,207 Minnesota Clinton (D) percent 46.9% votes 1,366,676 Trump (R) percent 45.4% votes 1,322,891 The race for the White House defied the polls and expectations as Donald Trump won more than the needed 270 votes in the electoral college while Hillary Clinton narrowly won the popular vote. -
2020 Final Public Subsidy Payments
CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD RELEASES FINAL PUBLIC SUBSIDY PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR 2020 ELECTION During 2020 the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board distributed $2,131,887 in public subsidy payments to 349 candidates running for state senate or state representative. The 349 candidates who received a public subsidy payment represent 78% of the 449 legislative candidates who were on the general election ballot. A list of qualifying candidates and the payments they received is attached. Of the 504 candidates who filed for state legislative office this year, 401 (79.3%) signed voluntary agreements to abide by spending limits and other conditions required to be eligible for public subsidy payments for their campaigns. To qualify for public subsidy a candidate must: • be opposed at either the primary or general election, • appear on the general election ballot, • sign and file a public subsidy agreement with the Board to abide by applicable campaign expenditure limits, and • raise a specified amount in contributions from individuals eligible to vote in Minnesota counting only the first $50 from each donor. Money for the public subsidy program comes from the state general fund. A portion of public subsidy money is allocated to specific parties and districts based on taxpayer checkoffs on income and property tax returns. By office and party, the total public subsidy payments totaled: DFL RPM State Senate $670,054 $393,772 House of Representatives $663,589 $404,471 Total $1,333,643 $798,243 DFL = Democratic Farmer Labor RPM = Republican Party of Minnesota Note: No other major or minor party candidates qualified for a public subsidy payment in 2020. -
Minnesota Primary: Key Incumbents Sent Packing
News & Insights Minnesota Primary: Key Incumbents Sent Packing Alert 08.12.2020 By Paul Cassidy In the face of a pandemic, while many Minnesotans went to their assigned polling places yesterday in order to cast ballots for a number of contested inter-party challenges on both the DFL and Republican side of the aisle, hovering over the election is the specter of counting thousands of mail-in absentee ballots in a timely fashion. Due to the pandemic, many polling places have been consolidated and polling officials worry also that they don't have enough election judges and ballot officials. As of Tuesday morning, almost 500,000 voters had cast their ballot votes by mail. Additionally, due to a court order, absentee ballots will be accepted after Election Day, up to the day before the county's canvassing date. Headlining this year's Minnesota primary was a pitched battle between first-term incumbent U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar and her challenger Antone Melton-Meaux, who were fighting for the DFL nomination and the right to go on to the general election. The race captured national attention due to Omar's high-profile progressive views and her membership in the "The Squad." Political analysts believe when all is said and done, this race will far outspend any previous primary totals in the history of Minnesota elections. In the end, Omar coasted to a relatively easy victory, with numbers not far off from her 2018 primary victory. A number of sitting Minnesota legislators faced challenges within their own party and fought to keep their seats in the Minnesota House and Senate. -
Legislative Update: March 25, 2019 MN Association of Watershed Districts
Legislative Update: March 25, 2019 MN Association of Watershed Districts What happened last week (March 18-22)? • The drainage work group bill was amended in the Senate to include a 5-year sunset on the portion of the bill that included the repair cost apportionment option. • The Senate introduced their environmental policy omnibus bill (SF 835) that includes the drainage work group bill and our coordinated watershed management and carp bills. • The Clean Water Fund appropriations bill was amended in the House. Some of the changes from the Clean Water Council recommendations include: technical assistance and research funds were zeroed out for the Department of Agriculture, money for conservation drainage projects ($3M) was zeroed out, the MPCA budget for intensive monitoring was decreased by $1.2M, and the Conservation Reserve and Enhancement Program (CREP) saw a decrease of $12.5M. Increased budgets went to Forever Green ($6.7M), the Targeted Wellhead Protection Program ($5.25M), and the Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ($7.542M). • The watershed planning modification bill (HF 2011) has a second hearing in the House. • Several bills for flood hazard mitigation bonding were heard in the House. What’s happening this week (March 25-29)? • The second policy committee deadline is March 29th. In order to be considered, all policy bills are supposed to be heard in both the House and Senate by this day. • The Outdoor Heritage Bill, HF340, has been added to the House Legacy Finance Division schedule for Wednesday, March 27, 2019. • The environmental policy omnibus bill (SF 835) will have a hearing in the Senate of Monday. -
Legislative Update
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Welcome to the first Child Care Aware Legislative Update of the 2021 legislative session. This narrative update, along with our Bill Tracker, will be posted each Tuesday (reflecting activity through the previous Friday) on the Child Care Aware of Minnesota website. Each week we will provide a brief overview of bills that have been introduced, action that has been taken at the committee level or on the floor, and any other pertinent news related to early care and education and school-age care issues. If you have additions to recommend to the bill tracker, please contact Ann McCully. OVERVIEW The Legislature convened on Tuesday, January 5 and is off to a quick start. There is no question that the state’s response to the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic is the primary issue facing legislators as they begin this session. This also a budget year to set the state’s budget for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023, and while the economic picture has improved since the initial budget forecast last spring, there is still a projected budget deficit in the coming years, leading to some tough decisions ahead. More information about the budget projections can be found on the State Office of Management and Budget website. COMMITTEE STRUCTURE A new, two-year legislative session brings new members, new committees, and new committee assignments. While early care and education issues may show up in many places during the process, below are a few of the key committees that we will be watching. We encourage you to follow them as well! To find out about committee upcoming committee hearings and topics, visit the Minnesota State Legislature combined calendar page. -
October/November 2018
MINNESOTA EDUCATOR OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2018 Organize, organize, organize: MFT ESPs engage with members all summer long MEA is here: everything you need to know before Oct. 18 Table of contents October/November 2018 – Volume 21, No. 2 The Minnesota Educator publishes every other The Minnesota National Board month. It is one of the union’s print and digital Certified Teacher Network provides publications to educate, inform and organize the community of members. The Educator is reported, support for Education Minnesota edited and designed by union staff members. The members applying for certification. paper is printed in LSC Communications’ union shop in Menasha, Wisconsin. Find copies of the page 6 Educator online at www.educationminnesota.org. Go to the News menu, then Minnesota Educator. Union members at St. Cloud To reach the publication for queries, Technical and Community story or commentary ideas College organize a “Great Big Email: [email protected] Giveaway” for students. Mail: Minnesota Educator 41 Sherburne Ave. page 7 St. Paul, MN 55103 To report a change of address or end Everything you need to know duplicate mailings, contact the Education about the MEA Conference, Minnesota membership department. including workshops, featured Email: [email protected] By web: www.educationminnesota.org and choose speakers, exhibitors and more. the Contact Us link to send a change of address. pages 9-12 To inquire about advertising in the Educator or on the website Thousands of worksite action Email: [email protected] Phone: 651-292-4864 leaders start on plans to motivate For general inquiries and business their colleagues to vote. -
CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL REPORT TOTAL TOTAL CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE: $___I Certify That This Is a Full and True Statement
CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL REPORT Chapter 211A Report Form (All of the information in this report is public information) Name of candidate, committee, or corporation_______________________________womenwinning State PAC _____________________________ Office sought or ballot question ___N/A______________________________________ District_____N/A ____________________ Type of Organization: ______ Candidate Committee ______X Political (Action) Committee/Corporation Type of report: _____ Initial report _____ Post-general Reporting period: __X___ Pre-primary _____ January report From_1/1/2020__________ to ___________7/26/2020 _____ Pre-general _____ Final report (closes committee account – see M.S. Ch. 211A.03 for requirements) CONTRIBUTIONS Give the total for all contributions received during the period of time covered by this report. See note on contribution limits on the instructions page. Use a separate sheet to itemize all contributions from a single source that exceed $100 during the calendar year. This itemization must include name, address, employer or occupation if self-employed, amount, and date. CASH $_______________32,350 + IN-KIND $_______________0 = TOTAL RECEIVED $ _______________32,350 EXPENDITURES Include every disbursement made for a political purpose during period of time covered by report. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Itemization must include date, purpose, and amount for each expenditure. Date Purpose Amount See Attached Schedule 31,614.98 TOTAL 31,614.98 CORPORATE PROJECT EXPENDITURES Corporations must list any media project -
Aq-Rule4-10Z4 Precisely the Type of Scenario the Legislature Envisioned When the Administrative Procedures Act Was Adopted
Jamie Long Attachment We, the 58 undersigned members of the Minnesota Legislature, offer the following comments in support of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Proposed Rules Adopting Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards—Clean Cars Minnesota, Minnesota Rules, chapter 7023. We appreciate the opportunity to comment in these proceedings and encourage adoption of the rules as necessary and reasonable, and commensurate with the public interest and Minnesota law. Clean Cars Minnesota has been the subject of significant public interest and discussion. As legislators, we have participated in robust ongoing dialogue regarding the merits of the proposed rules with our constituents, stakeholders, and each other. This careful and deliberate scrutiny has led us to the conclusion that the proposed rules will benefit Minnesotans and should be adopted. Statutory Authority and Legislative Intent As current members of the legislative branch, we are uniquely positioned to offer our perspective on the authority and responsibilities granted to the agency by the Legislature specific to vehicle emissions as well as the agency’s general rulemaking authority. The powers and responsibilities of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) are described in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116. Of particular relevance to the proposed rules, Section 116.07, Subdivision 2, states “the agency shall also adopt standards of air quality, including maximum allowable standards of emission of air contaminants from motor vehicles…”. This provision demonstrates in very specific terms the Legislature’s intent that MPCA is expected to adopt standards of the exact type now proposed by the agency. This language was adopted in 1967, which means that the Minnesota House and Senate have had 54 regular sessions in which we could have reconsidered and agreed upon a repeal or amendment of this section of law. -
Protect Minnesota Orange Star Leaders MN State Legislature As of June 1, 2019
Protect Minnesota Orange Star Leaders MN State Legislature As of June 1, 2019 Orange Star members have shown themselves to be committed to saving lives by passing gun violence prevention bills. It’s very important that we communicate our sincere thanks to these legislators... Orange Star MN Senate Members 51 Jim Carlson 40 Chris Eaton 52 Matt Klein 45 Ann Rest 59 Bobby Joe Champion 49 Melisa Franzen 41 Carolyn Laine 7 Erik Simonson 57 Greg Clausen 19 Nick Frentz 46 Ron Latz 63 Patricia Torres Ray 64 Richard Cohen 67 Foung Hawj 58 Matt Little 43 Charles Wiger 48 Steve Cwodzinski 62 Jeff Hayden 66 John Marty 50 Melissa Wiklund 61 Scott Dibble 42 Jason Isaacson 37 Jerry Newton 60 Kari Dziedzic 53 Susan Kent 65 Sandra Pappas Orange Star MN House Members These members all voted to pass the Criminal Background Checks and ERPO bills in 2019. 44B Patty Acomb 62B Aisha Gomez 20B Todd Lippert 52B Ruth Richardson 34B Kristin Bahner 51B Laurie Halverson 60A Diane Loeffler 53B Steve Sandell 42B Jamie Becker-Finn 52A Rick Hansen 61B Jamie Long 25B Duane Sauke 41A Connie Bernardy 62A Hodan Hassan 67A Tim Mahoney 7A Jennifer Schultz 57A Robert Bierman 66A Alice Hausman 56B Alice Mann 36A Zack Stephenson 19A Jeff Brand 64A Kaohly Her 65B Carlos Mariani 55A Brad Tabke 56A Hunter Cantrell 61A Frank Hornstein 51A Sandra Masin 40B Samantha Vang 50B Andrew Carlson 50A Michael Howard 42A Kelly Moller 63B Jean Wagenius 45A Lyndon Carlson 57B John Huot 65A Rena Moran 38B Ami Wazlawik 39B Shelly Christensen 44A Ginny Klevorn 33B Kelly Morrison 46A Ryan Winkler 54A Anne Claflin 37A Erin Koegel 03B Mary Murphy 14B Dan Wolgamott 19B Jack Considine 48B Carlie Kotyza-Witthuhn 40A Michael Nelson 67B Jay Xiong 63A Jim Davnie 41B Mary Kunesh-Podein 60B Mohamud Noor 53A Tou Xiong 59B Raymond Dehn 59A Fue Lee 07B Liz Olson 46B Cheryl Youakim 49A Heather Edelson 66B John Lesch 05A John Persell 49B Steve Elkins 26A Tina Liebling 64B Dave Pinto 36B Speaker Melissa Hortman 43A Peter Fischer 4A Ben Lien 27B Jeanne Poppe 45B Mike Freiberg 43B Leon Lillie 48A Laurie Pryor . -
Minnesota Citizens for the Arts
MINNESOTA Vote Citizens for the Arts Legislative Candidate Survey 2016 smART! The election on November 8, 2016 will have a huge impact on the arts and on our country. If you agree with thousands of Minnesotans who believe that the arts matter, you’ll want to know where legislators stand. IMPORTANT: Visit the Secretary of State’s website to fnd out your district and where to vote: http://pollfnder.sos.state.mn.us/ READ: We’ve asked all legislative candidates fve questions about current arts issues so they can tell you how they would vote. Due to limited space, comments were limited to 3 sentences. To see full responses visit our website at www.artsmn.org ALL STARS: Look for the symbol telling you which legislators have been awarded an Arts All Star from MCA for their exceptional support for the arts at the legislature! CONNECT: With MCA on Facebook, Twitter @MNCitizen, and our website www.artsmn.org. We’ll make sure you stay informed. ASK: If your candidates didn’t respond to the survey, make sure to ask them these questions when you see them on the campaign trail! ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ Minnesota Citizens for the Arts is a non-partisan statewide arts advocacy organization whose mission is to ensure the opportunity for all people to have access to and involvement in the arts. MCA organizes the arts com- munity and lobbies the Minnesota State Legislature and U.S. Congress on issues pertaining to the nonproft arts. MCA does not endorse candidates for public ofce. MCA’s successes include passing the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment in 2008 which created dedi- cated funding for the arts in the Minnesota State Constitution for the next 25 years, and the Creative Minnesota research project at CreativeMN.org. -
Journal of the Senate NINETY-FIRST LEGISLATURE
STATE OF MINNESOTA Journal of the Senate NINETY-FIRST LEGISLATURE SEVENTH SPECIAL SESSION FIRST DAY St. Paul, Minnesota, Monday, December 14, 2020 The Senate met at 3:00 p.m. and was called to order by the President. The members of the Senate paused for a moment of silent prayer and reflection. The members of the Senate gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. The Secretary called the roll by legislative district in numerical order as follows: First District. Mark Johnson Second District. Paul J. Utke Third District. Thomas M. Bakk Fourth District. Kent Eken Fifth District. Justin D. Eichorn Sixth District. David J. Tomassoni Seventh District. Erik Simonson Eighth District. Bill Ingebrigtsen Ninth District. Paul E. Gazelka Tenth District. Carrie Ruud Eleventh District. Jason Rarick Twelfth District. Torrey N. Westrom Thirteenth District. Jeff R. Howe Fourteenth District. Jerry Relph Fifteenth District. Andrew Mathews Sixteenth District. Gary H. Dahms Seventeenth District. Andrew R. Lang Eighteenth District. Scott J. Newman Nineteenth District. Nick A. Frentz Twentieth District. Rich Draheim Twenty-First District. Michael P. Goggin Twenty-Second District. Bill Weber 2 JOURNAL OF THE SENATE [1ST DAY Twenty-Third District. Julie A. Rosen Twenty-Fourth District. John R. Jasinski Twenty-Fifth District. David H. Senjem Twenty-Sixth District. Carla J. Nelson Twenty-Seventh District. Dan Sparks Twenty-Eighth District. Jeremy R. Miller Twenty-Ninth District. Bruce D. Anderson Thirtieth District. Mary Kiffmeyer Thirty-First District. Michelle R. Benson Thirty-Second District. Mark W. Koran Thirty-Third District. David J. Osmek Thirty-Fourth District. Warren Limmer Thirty-Fifth District. -
Senate File 959 (EAB Provisions, Senate/House Environment
MEMORANDUM May 6, 2021 Senator Bill Ingebrigtsen Representative Rick Hansen Senator Carrie Ruud Representative Ami Wazlawik Senator Justin Eichorn Representative Kelly Morrison Senator David Tomassoni Representative Peter Fischer Senator Torrey Westrom Representative Josh Heintzeman Dear Members of the Environment and Natural Resources Conference Committee (SF959): The Partnership on Waste and Energy (Partnership) is a Joint Powers Board of Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington counties. We seek to end waste, promote renewable energy and enhance the health and resiliency of communities we serve while advancing equity and responding to the challenges of a changing climate. In a separate letter addressed to the committee, the Partnership included support for certain Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) provisions amidst comments on several other provisions in the Senate and House omnibus bills currently being deliberated in the committee. We would like to call specific attention to these EAB provisions and emphasize our strong support. EAB is now established in at least 27 Minnesota counties and continues to spread. Communities are removing and replacing ash trees as quickly as funding will allow to slow the spread of EAB. The challenge of properly managing the surge of waste wood created as we battle EAB is one of the urgent concerns of the Partnership. State law prohibits landfilling wood waste. Wood waste cannot be sent to MSW waste-to-energy facilities. Open burning, even if it were allowed, creates fire dangers and poor air quality, adversely impacting human health. The Partnership urges the conferees to adopt the following provisions to increase efforts to slow the spread of EAB and slow the rate of increase of wood waste.