Reformation: Sola Scriptura

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reformation: Sola Scriptura 1 The Authority of Scripture Acts 5:17-32; 2 Peter 1:20-21 In the year 1517 the German priest Martin Luther wanted an academic debate about some of the practices of the Christian church. He gave notice of this debate by posting his ideas – his theses. There were 95 of them … 95 points of concern about corruption and false teaching, particularly the notion that you could be assured of salvation by purchasing indulgences.1 He debated representatives of the Roman church. He wrote numerous sermons and papers, calling for reform within the church. Luther never wanted to break away from the church or splinter it; he merely wanted it to make a “course correction” and get back to the teachings of the apostles. But the church was steeped in centuries of tradition and papal authority, and Luther simply couldn’t get Pope Leo X to listen. In April 1521 the emperor, Charles V, convened a diet – an imperial assembly – to settle the issue in a town called Worms, Germany. (I know. It looks like we’re talking about the nutritional value of nightcrawlers … but it’s a meeting … in “Varms.”) At this assembly, Luther was told again to recant, to reject his theses that had created such division. Here’s how Luther responded: “Unless I am convinced by the testimony of Scripture or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well-known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted. My conscience is captive to the Word of God.2 … Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. God help me. Amen.”3 With those words Martin Luther was branded a heretic and declared an outlaw of the empire. But with those words he put forth the principle of sola Scriptura – the notion that the Word of God is the decisive authority in a Christian’s life. I can’t help but notice that Luther’s response was very much like the response of the apostles, as we just heard in Acts 5. The political and religious leaders told them to stop, and they responded, “We must – we must – obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). 2 A Biblical Worldview Do you have that kind of conviction in your faith life? Do you have that kind of rock-solid foundation that compels you to stand up for what you believe, even in the face of great opposition? Can you say that your conscience is captive to the Word of God? Take a moment right now and ask yourself: What is the primary source of guidance and direction in your life? What is the authoritative lens through which you see the world? I can tell you this: If you answered anything other than the Word of God, you will be disappointed. Everything else in this world falls short. Ultimately, only Scripture leads us to the love and grace of Jesus Christ. The entire Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, points us to Jesus. And only Jesus has the words of truth and wisdom that lead to an abundant life now and eternal life later. When we are trying to make sense of the world and determine how to get the most out of life, we have all kinds of possible guides and teachers: Science helps us understand the world and greatly improves modern life. We can also rely on human reason and logic to guide us. Politics and government offer guidelines for civilized living. We even have great traditions and a heritage that binds us together. The problem is science answers the how and the what … but it can never answer the “Why?” Why does the universe exist? Why am I here? What is my purpose? The problem with reason and logic is that we are flawed, biased individuals who naturally want to protect our own self-interests. Similarly, laws and politics serve a purpose, but any government is ultimately made up of flawed, imperfect people. Culture and popular opinion are constantly changing and shifting. Traditions link us to the past, but they can also blind us to new possibilities. We have many possible guides and points of view to choose from, but everything in this world falls short. Only the Bible leads us to Jesus. Only the Word of God is powerful and perfectly sufficient for our lives. 3 The Authenticity of Scripture How do we know this? Because the Bible tells us so. I’ll admit, there’s a bit of circular logic here. It’s a little like me telling my wife that I’m a great driver. She’ll say, “Who told you that?” “I do – I tell myself that every time I get in the car.” But if I’ve never been in an accident, and if I’ve never gotten a ticket, and if my insurance company is giving me a good-driver discount, then maybe there’s some truth to my claim. (At least that’s what I keep telling myself.) So consider this about the Bible: It’s not just one book, but a book of books. Sixty-six books, to be exact, written over 1,500 years by about 40 different authors. It was written in three different languages on two separate continents. Despite all of that, its message is perfectly consistent, without any contradictions. Many of the events recorded in both the Old and New Testaments have been independently verified by archaeological and historical sources. Many Biblical authors claim they were eyewitnesses to the events they wrote about. If any of those authors were lying, there should have been plenty of people around who could discredit them. But no one ever could. Many of the writings of classic Greek authors such as Plato and Aristotle are believed to be reliable and genuine – even though we have only a few dozen copies that were made within 1,000 years of the author’s life. There are well over 24,000 manuscripts of New Testament writings, 5,000 of them in the original Greek, all dated to within 100 years of the author’s life. Although there are fewer original copies of the Old Testament writings, the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947 showed that the Scriptures handed down through the generations were tremendously accurate … there were only a handful of differences, and most of those were variations in spelling and style.4 The bottom line is that from a purely human standpoint, the Bible as we have it today is very much the same as it was 2,000 years ago – and that should give us a high level of certainty as to its authenticity and reliability. 4 The Superiority of Scripture But is it really the Word … of God? Does it really deserve to be the leading authority for how I live my life? Ultimately, that’s a matter of faith … and obedience. Yet I would say there’s a good case to be made for why Scripture – and Scripture alone – is the best authority for what I believe and how I live. First, I believe that the Bible is divinely inspired – that is, God Himself gave the words to those 40-some authors to write down. And that makes it infinitely better than any human reasoning. The Apostle Paul wrote that “All Scripture is breathed out by God” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Apostle Peter wrote, “You must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:20-21). The men who were eyewitnesses of Jesus believed that every word of Scripture – the Old Testament writings as well as the teachings of the apostles – came from the Holy Spirit, not from human invention. Because the Bible is divinely inspired, I believe that means it is also divinely infallible. Let’s return for a moment to Martin Luther. In his day, the word of popes and church councils were seen to carry the same weight as the Word of God. But Luther knew that human popes and councils could make errors and contradictions. As just one example, only 100 years earlier, from 1409 to 1414, there were three men who all simultaneously claimed to be the true pope. If you really want all the gory details, go home and Google “Western Schism.” The bottom line is that you had one pope in Rome, another in France, and a third who rose to power in Pisa. Naturally, the question was, who was the rightful leader of the church? Which pope had the authority to speak on Jesus’ behalf? 5 If Scripture is the deciding authority, you don’t have that problem. As the Word of God, Scripture cannot be in error, and it does not contradict itself. Don’t misunderstand: The doctrine of sola scriptura does not mean that Scripture is the only authority. But it should be the ultimate, decisive authority for the Church and for every Christian. If a pastor, priest, or even a pope contradicts Scripture, if they contradict one another, Scripture should be the deciding factor, the supreme authority. I hope that everything I preach to you is an inspired word of God that has the potential to touch hearts and change lives. But my word is not the final word. Scripture says you should “test the spirits”5 – you should test the prophets and test us preachers and make sure that everything we say is in line with the word of God.
Recommended publications
  • Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism
    TLC 4 TLC THEOLOgy in thE LifE OF thE Church Vol. 4 The spread and influence of diverse expressions of Pentecostalism through out the world, especially in Africa, is posing significant challenges to Lutheran as well as other churches. At a seminar of the Lutheran World Federation in South Africa, theologians discussed how they are responding to these challenges. Articles in this book highlight how some Lutheran convictions to Respond Pentecostalism Lutherans and understandings can counter, balance or expand upon Pentecostal beliefs and practices. Contributors include: J. Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu, Ghana; Ibrahim Bitrus, Nigeria; Musawenkosi Biyela, South Africa; Samuel Dawai, Cameroon; Hans-Peter Grosshans, Germany; Guillermo Hansen, Argentina/USA; Paul John Isaak, Namibia/Switzerland; Rogate Mshana, Tanzania/Switzerland; Sarojini Nadar, South Africa; Cheryl S. Pero, USA; Gertrud Tönsing, South Africa; and Galana Babusa Yako, Kenya. Lutherans Respond The editor, Karen L. Bloomquist, directs the Department for Theology and Studies, LWF, Geneva, Switzerland. to Pentecostalism LWF The Lutheran World Federation – A Communion of Churches ISBN (Europe) 978-3-905676-68-6 DTS-Studies-201002-text.indd 10 02/03/2011 15:55:18 PM Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism edited by Karen L. Bloomquist on behalf of the Lutheran World Federation— A Communion of Churches Lutheran University Press Minneapolis, Minnesota Previous volumes in the Theology in the Life of the Church series Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Being the Church in the Midst of Empire. Trinitarian Reflections Simone Sinn (ed.), Deepening Faith, Hope and Love in Relations with Neighbors of Other Faiths Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Identity, Survival, Witness. Reconfiguring Theological Agendas Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism Theology in the Life of the Church, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REFORMATION Sola Scriptura John 1:1, 14; II Timothy 3:16-17 The
    THE REFORMATION The use of Latin in the services. Sola Scriptura And all the paraphernalia (icons and idols) that John 1:1, 14; II Timothy 3:16-17 expressed and/or supported these ideas. The church, before the Reformation, had become riddled Even though the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox with abuse. The Popes were worldly...and abuses within the churches foundationally fall within Orthodoxy as most would ranks of the church ranged from nepotism to financial excess define it, much of their teaching beyond the basic tenets is to simony (the buying or selling of a church office or regarded as erroneous by conservative Protestants. In fact, promotion), immorality, and venality (being open to bribery they would say much of it is clearly to be regarded as false or overly motivated by money). The majority of clergy tended teaching which has perverted the gospel of God's grace in to live scandalous and greedy lives. Jesus Christ. In general, evangelical Protestants see the This disdain and mistrust of the Catholic Church was the Reformation as simply a call back to biblical Christianity. major cause for the Protestant Reformation. Reformers Martin Luther particularly decried the selling of indulgences and offering of forgiveness for sins in exchange for money. For years, Martin Luther, an Augustinian monk, had been critical of the Catholic Church, particularly of the idea of Another point of criticism of the church at the time was that selling of indulgences, or the reprieves that came from the common layperson didn't know much about Christian- penance. Luther had become disillusioned by what he saw as ity, since the sermon was rendered in Latin so that common the Church's corruption, especially as manifested in the people couldn't understand them.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Solas' of the Reformation
    THE ‘‘SOLAS’’ OF THE REFORMATION The Reformation’s theological basis, though deep, was simple, resting on a handful of fundamental principles. Our salvation is entirely by God’s grace and not of our own doing. We receive that grace, and are justified, through faith, and not by any works we do. These principles were set forth in Article IV of the Augsburg Confession. 1 To these material principles of the Reformation is added the formal principle, stated in the Formula of Concord, that the sole norm and rule of doctrine is the Holy Scripture. These three principles are referred to as the ‘‘three solas’’------by grace alone, through faith alone, learned from Scripture alone. Some writers, especially among the Reformed, would add two other ‘‘solas’’------for the sake of Christ alone, and to God alone the glory. 2 Lutherans would not disagree with them as to that, though those two ‘‘solas’’ are actually solo propter Christum and soli Deo gloria . Nothing could be more important to each of us than knowing whether we are saved, whether we are destined for eternal life with God. There has been a certain tension in Christian doctrine from the very beginning. Christians agree that the saved have eternal life with God; “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life”3; “In my Father’s house are many mansions; if it we not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and 1 prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.” 4 All Christians likewise agree that our salvation comes by God’s grace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lutheran Confessions and 'Sola Scriptura' "
    Vol. XXSIII Spring, 1969 KO. 1 TIIESPEIXGFIELDEE is p~~blishedquarterly by the faculty of Con- cordia Theological Seminary, Springfield, Illinois, of the Lutheran Church -Ilissouri Synod. EDTT'ORl-41_ COZIZITTTEE EEICHH. HEIATLES,Editor R,iu~~o..;nF. SLRGGRG, Boo!: He??iezrEditor D.2~~11)P. ~CAEP.,'4ssocinte Editor ~~AKKI. SIFEGE, A,snciatt. Editor ~'I:LSII)E~TJ. I. 0. PKELS, EX officio Contents RESPOSSES TO "\VH:Ill COLTXI1 I'AIFST TO THE 'SOL,I GI'lATI-I' 1U THE 1.L 7 HER-\s C CISFESSIOSS 1s I*OLJ'ES'' Hrc IIA~:~J. Sc HUT TZ ERICH13. HL.,ISTZO RESI'OhSES TO "THI LCTHLI'l.1S CONFES5lOn'S AND 'SOI-A SC RIYTL;RL4' " EV(:ESE 't. KLLG FKED ~K,WER lndcx~rfi?, 13~~sTO RELIGIOUS PERIODICAL LITERATURE, published by the Amcric(i?i Tt~eoJog~culLihroq Association, JI~Corn~ickSenzina~? Lihrnn, Chicr~go.: 'llnor~. Clergy chdngcs of .~ddressreported to Concorda Publishing House, St. Louis, Missouri, will also cover mailing change of The Syrizzgfielder. Other changes of address should he sent to the Business Manager of The Springfielder, Con- cordia Theological Seminary, Springfield, Illinois 62702. ilddr~ssconlrnunications to the Editor, Erich H. Heintzen, Concordia Thee logical Seminary, Springfield, Illinois 62 7 02. A Reaction to The Essay: "The Lutheran Confessions and 'Sola Scriptura' " I. O!?servatio~zson the essay itself HE ESSAY very properly recogni~esthe fact that the Lutheran T Confessions are Trinitarian, i.e., they point the church which is pledged to these confcssions to the Triune God as her God. The Trinitarian faith, moreover, confesses "Sola gratia" as the chief article of faith, and views all theology, also the Scripture itself, from the vantage point of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Mlttnlngtrttl 6Tnt~L!J Continuing LEHRE UND WEHRE MAGAZIN FUER EV.·Lu TH
    (!!nurnr~ta mlttnlngtrttl 6tnt~l!J Continuing LEHRE UND WEHRE MAGAZIN FUER EV.·Lu TH. H OMILETIK THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY. THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY Vol.xvm November, 1947 No. It CONTENTS Pale The Una Sancta in Luther's Theology, F. E. Ma)er_ 801 Memorandum Concerning the Church Situation ill Germany. Martin Klunke _. __ __ _ _ _ 815 The Consensus of Sandomierz. A Chaptel' from the Polish Reformation. J aroslav P Ukan. J r. .. __ ___ _. _________ . _. _____ . 825 Contributors to This Issue _ _ . _ .. 838 Outlines on the Nassau Pericopes _ ... _._____ _ ___ _. _ 839 Miscellanea _ ___ .. _____ .. ________ 853 Theological Observer ___ . ____ .. _. ________ . 859 Book Review .__ .... _.. _ _ ._._ .. _____ _ _ 872 Eln Predi ger muss nlcht allein wet­ Es 1st keln Ding, das die Leute den. also cL~ss er die Schafe unter­ mehr bel der Klrche behaeIt denn weise, wle sie rechte Christen sollen die gute Predigt. - Apologie. Arl.24 sein, sondern auch daneben den Woel­ fen wehTen. dass sle die Schafe nicht angy-eiten und mit falscher Lehre ver­ If the trumpet give an uncertain fuehren und Irrtum elnfuehren. sound. who shall prepare himself to Luther the battle? - 1 COT. 14:8 Published by the Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States I I CONCORDIA PUBUSIDNG BOUSE, St Louis 18, Mo. i pUIf'DD IN lJ. S ••• I. Concordia Theological Monthly Vol. XVIII NOVEMBER. 1947 No. 11 The Una Sancta in Luther's Theology* By F. E. MAYER Luther's concept of the Una Sancta was first and last so­ teriological; not sociological, not statistical, not organizational, not eschatological.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Lutheran Reformation
    Celebrating the 500 th Anniversary of the Protestant Reformation Sola Gratia Grace Alone Sola Fide Faith Alone Sola Scriptura Scripture Alone Martin Luther nailing his 95 Theses on the church door. Wittenberg, Germany. October 31, 1517 Contents Main People.............................................................................................1 Important Words......................................................................................2 Important Cities.......................................................................................4 Reformation Map ....................................................................................5 Chronology..............................................................................................6 Contents of the Book of Concord............................................................8 Luther's 95 Theses...................................................................................9 Luther's own description of the Reformation........................................14 Who Are Lutherans? .............................................................................19 The Lutheran Reformation Main People Earlier Reformers John Wycliffe (died 1384) -- England, translated the Latin Bible to English Jan (John) Hus (died 1415) -- Bohemia, executed (burned at the stake) People with Luther Johann Staupitz -- Luther's mentor, head of the Augustinian monastery Duke Frederick the Wise of Saxony -- Luther's protector Georg Spalatin -- Duke Frederick's assistant and problem solver in
    [Show full text]
  • The Sola Scriptura Principle in the Current Debate1
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 24/1 (2013):107-126. Article copyright © 2013 by Aleksandar S. Santrac. The Sola Scriptura Principle in the Current Debate1 Aleksandar S. Santrac, D.Phil., Ph.D. Professor of Religion, Philosophy & Ethics University of the Southern Caribbean, Trinidad, WI Extraordinary Associate Professor of Dogmatics North-West University, RSA Introduction In this article, I would like to present the contemporary Evangelical position on the sola scriptura principle, in the context of ecumenical dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church and the brief conversation with a current Adventist position. The preliminary working definition of the sola scriptura principle, from the conventional Protestant/Evangelical standpoint, may include: i. the primary and absolute authority of the Scripture, as originally given, as the final court of appeal for all doctrine and practice; ii. the sufficiency of the Scripture as the final written authority of God; iii. the clearness (perspicuity) of the essential biblical message; iv. the primacy of the Scriptures over all tradition rather than a total rejection of tradition and, v. the principle that Scripture interprets Scripture without external authority.2 1 This article is partially a brief excerpt from my Sola Scriptura: Benedict XVI’s Theology of the Word of God, PhD dissertation, North-West University, RSA, 2012. 2 Norman L. Geisler & Ralph E. MacKenzie, Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1995), 178-179. 107 JOURNAL
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    The Search for Anglican Identity M. H. Turner Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Anglican Disposition? 4 The Anglican Branch? 9 The Anglican Via Media? 18 The Anglican Attraction? 28 Why Does There Need to Be a Search for Anglican Identity? 33 Conclusion 44 Introduction The word Anglicanism may seem surprisingly difficult to define. The ​ ​ task might even seem impossible. Almost two millennia ago one could speak of the church in England, and in time it became clear there was a ​ ​ church of England. But even at the Reformation there was nothing ​ ​ called “Anglicanism.” No one at the time would have thought of Anglicanism as a different expression of the Christian faith, as if the town of Wittenberg might have needed an “Anglican” church down the street from a “Lutheran” one. By the time there is a clear idea of Anglicanism as a distinct ism, we are ​ ​ certainly past the Restoration, and we might even be into the nineteenth 1 century. Today we are in what could be called the long nineteenth century, with no end to the Anglican definitional wars, because there is no definition that can comprehend the vast diversity of what travels under that name. It would be like trying to come up with a definition for Catholicism if there were no pope, no mass, and so on. Yet we must ​ say something about Anglican identity, at least if we want to give an account to ourselves and to others of what we are. The search for Anglican identity is at the heart of a recent debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Being the Church of the Future Sola Scriptura: “Scripture Alone” October 22, 2017
    500 Forward: Being the Church of the Future Sola Scriptura: “Scripture Alone” October 22, 2017 As We Gather: As we gather today, we hold to what many in our world today consider an untenable position. Many believe that because churches hold to the truths of God’s Word found in the scriptures that we are on the “Wrong side of history”. But nothing could be further from the truth. In the 1500’s Martin Luther was being challenged and condemned for his beliefs. But because his critics consistently contradicted one another, Luther found no comfort or fear in their answers. Instead, Luther put His faith and hope in the only One who doesn’t shift like sand. The Word of God. Today, there are so many voices clamoring saying; “Listen to me”, “this is right”, “things have changed.” But where will you ultimately put your hope? Lutherans are called to put their hope in the Word of God which never changes. Pre-Service Music Video - Scripture Alone Welcome Sharing of the Peace Send, O Lord, Your Holy Spirit LSB 681 Public domain Stand Opening Litany and Invocation: P: Lord God, You are our Mighty Fortress (Psalm 46:1) C: Our Help in times of trouble. (Psalm 46:1) P: Lord our God, You are our Refuge and our strength (Psalm 46:1) C: You are the Rock of our salvation. (Psalm 62:2) P: Lord our God, You are our deliverer, You fight for Your people. (Psalm 18:2) C: The Battle is not ours, it is the Lord’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Journal
    CONCORDIA JOURNAL Volume 32 April 2006 Number 2 CONTENTS EDITORIALS Editor’s Note .............................................................................. 126 Theological Observer ................................................................. 128 ARTICLES Aspects of Lutheran Identity: A Confessional Perspective Werner Klän ..............................................................................133 Luther Discovers the Gospel: Coming to the Truth and Confessing the Truth Robert Rosin ......................................................................... 147 Luther at Worms and Wartburg: Still Confessing Robert Rosin.............................................................................. 161 Here We Stand: Confessing the Faith in Luther’s Footsteps from Worms to Smalcald Robert Kolb ........................................................................... 175 The Formula of Concord as a Model for Discourse in the Church Robert Kolb ........................................................................... 189 GRAMMARIAN’S CORNER................................................................211 HOMILETICAL HELPS .................................................................. 214 BOOK REVIEWS ............................................................................... 238 BOOKS RECEIVED ........................................................................... 252 CONCORDIA JOURNAL/APRIL 2006 125 Editor’s Note The five articles presented in this issue were originally given at the twenty-first conference
    [Show full text]
  • Sola Scriptura VS. Sacred Tradition
    Sola Scriptura VS. Sacred Tradition This document is divided into four sections: - What is Sola Scriptura? - Does the Bible teach Sola Scriptura? - What are the traditions that are spoken of in Scripture? - Addressing Catholic counter-arguments to the above statements. What Is Sola Scriptura? • The Bible claims to be the sole and sufficient rule of faith for the church. All that we need to know for godliness is found within it and nothing outside of it is binding upon the Christian conscience. Its authority comes from its nature as God-breathed, and as such it is self- consistent, self-interpreting, and self-authenticating. Sola Scriptura is a Biblical reality for the normative state of the church, i.e. once the apostles passed off the scene. While the essence of sola scriptura was affirmed in the scripture, it was also realized that God was still giving authoritative revelation through prophets and apostles. Even revelations through them were to be tested against the previously recorded scriptures. • What it is not: o It is not a statement that says that the Bible is the source of all knowledge. There are many things, even the words of Christ and letters of Paul, that are not in the Bible. o It is not a statement that the church does not have an authority to teach the Bible. The church does not stand over it or add to it, but only teaches what is found in scripture. o It is not a statement that denies the word of God was at one time orally communicated. During the time of the prophets and the apostles, “men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.” 2 Pet.
    [Show full text]
  • Sola Scriptura: Authority Versus Interpretation?
    W.H. Oliver Dr. W.H. Oliver, SOLA SCRIPTURA: Department of Christian Spirituality, Church AUTHORITY VERSUS History and Missiology, UNISA, South Africa. INTERPRETATION? E-mail: Olivee@unisa. ac.za ORCID: https://orcid. org/0000-0001-5607- ABSTRACT 8833 This article discusses the term Sola Scriptura and E. Oliver the consequences of its application on the church, Prof. E. Oliver, commencing with the Church Fathers, when the principle/ Department of Christian idea of Sola Scriptura was already present, and followed Spirituality, Church by Martin Luther, whose 95 theses served as an ignition History and Missiology, for the Reformation. Luther’s action led to the founding UNISA, South Africa. of the Protestant movement, with his followers separating E-mail: Olivee@unisa. themselves from the Roman Catholic Church on the ac.za grounds of Scripture. Over the past 500 years, a myriad ORCID: https://orcid. org/0000-0003-3606- of different churches has been established within the 1537 Protestant movement, separating themselves from other Protestants, each with the conviction of Sola Scriptura. DOI: http://dx.doi. The impression is that, although the authority of Scripture org/10.18820/23099089/ is maintained, their interpretation of Scripture has led them actat.v40i1.7 to found new churches. This then applied to the traditional Afrikaans-speaking Reformed Churches in South Africa, ISSN 1015-8758 (Print) that came to this country as one church, and led to the ISSN 2309-9089 (Online) establishment of at least five separate churches. Acta Theologica
    [Show full text]