Stoneware of the Eastern United States by Mark Zipp Introduction Jugs, Pitchers, Butter and Cake Crocks Vessel Was Thrown

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stoneware of the Eastern United States by Mark Zipp Introduction Jugs, Pitchers, Butter and Cake Crocks Vessel Was Thrown Bottles and Extras March-April 2008 29 Stoneware of the Eastern United States By Mark Zipp Introduction jugs, pitchers, butter and cake crocks vessel was thrown. Much like the different Gaining popularity in the late (shallow, cylindrical forms), milk pans schools of painting and furniture-making eighteenth century and rapidly declining in (shallow, tapering crocks with spouts), and in America, there were, in a sense, different production by 1900, salt-glazed stoneware spittoons. Salt-glazed stoneware potteries schools of potting. Some of these schools was one of America’s great containers of existed from Maine to Virginia, extending of style, which will be discussed, are New common household goods. as far west as Ohio and Minnesota. Other York and New England, Central Whether it be a pitcher for cream, a potteries operating in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Western Pennsylvania, crock for lard, a jug for whiskey, or a Georgia and other Southern states, Baltimore, and Strasburg, Virginia. chamberpot for the bedroom, a single produced alkaline and some salt-glazed household could require many pieces for ware. Stoneware reached its maximum New York and New England daily life. Today, what was once respected production among the Eastern potteries The Northern potteries of New York for its utilitarian function has now become circa 1880. state and New England produced highly admired among collectors for its decorative The early years of American stoneware, refined stoneware with a whitish clay, appeal and historical significance. circa 1750 to 1810, will not be discussed glossy salt glaze and bright cobalt blue. Stoneware is a term used to describe in this article. Though several pieces of Generally, Northern stoneware contains less pottery which has been fired in a kiln at a this period, particularly by the Crolius and imperfections and firing flaws than that high temperature, approximately 2,300 Remmey families of Manhattan, represent produced in the South. The clean, light degrees Fahrenheit, and which has some of the most important examples of color of the clay and vibrant blue on hardened to a stone-like body. The resultant American folk art, this article will primarily many of these pieces makes them seem, clay color can be anywhere from nearly focus on the years when stoneware potting at least to the untrained eye, nearly white to dark brown or dark olive. was a successful enterprise throughout indistinguishable from modern Stoneware, even when fired to a reddish much of the East. The potteries referred to reproductions. This resemblance is partly hue, is not to be confused with “redware,” in this article roughly pertain to the time due to the industrialization of such which has a porous, softer body, and which period 1850 to 1880. businesses. Many of the Northern is fired at a lower temperature. stoneware operations were quite large, with Most pieces of stoneware, after being Values numerous workers and high quality clay thrown on a wheel, were stamped with a Value in stoneware is based on three and equipment, which translated into maker’s mark, as well as a capacity mark major criteria: the decoration, maker and massive outputs. They should be viewed 1 to indicate gallonage, such as 1, 1 /2, 2 or form of the vessel. As with any collectible, more as factories, which had become more 3. They were then allowed to air dry and condition also plays a major role, with standardized in their production than harden as “greenware.” After drying, each cracks, chips and broken parts decreasing potteries in the South. piece would be decorated with cobalt oxide, the value of a quality example by several Most Northern pieces, besides being a compound which, when fired with salt, hundred, perhaps several thousand, dollars. glazed on the exterior with cobalt and salt, produced a bright blue coloration. [Some Above all, decoration is the most defining were also glazed on the interior with a dark potters, such as Henry Glazier of factor in a piece of stoneware’s worth, with brown “Albany slip.” This thick coating Huntingdon, Pa., and George N. Fulton of rare decorations, like people and animals, kept food products from soaking into the Allegheny County, Va., used manganese for making a piece most desirable. The value body of the vessel. Most common among their decorations, which, when fired, of a piece also fluctuates based on whether stoneware forms thrown by Northern produced a rusty brown color. Most or not it is signed. Signatures always potters are semi-ovoid cream jars, straight- manganese-decorated stoneware is increase the value of a piece. Even sided jugs with thick, round spouts and considered rare.] Brushes or occasionally attributing an unsigned piece to a given straight-sided crocks, of similarly slip cups, funnel-like instruments that maker based on its style can make it worth proportioned heights and widths. poured the cobalt in fine, raised trails, were more. The form of the vessel also plays a Northern potters, particularly those used to decorate the exterior of the vessels. role in value and desirability, with less from Upstate New York, produced Decorating through the use of a slip cup is commonly produced items, like banks, stoneware with perhaps the greatest variety known as slip-trailing. The load of ware water coolers and inkwells being some of of decorations among all makers operating would then be stacked in a kiln to be fired, the most sought after. in nineteenth century America. Besides with each piece separated by crude or standard flower and bird decorations, they molded kiln furniture. When the kiln Areas of Collecting also made pieces with hand-painted reached the desired temperature, a kilnman Most stoneware enthusiasts collect by animals, such as dogs, cats, fish, and would shovel salt inside. The salt would region, seeking pieces of a certain style horses, as well as people, faces, houses, vaporize and fuse to the surfaces of the made in a certain geographic region. The ships, flags, and numerous others. vessels, resulting in an impenetrable, glass- vast number of potteries of the Eastern U.S. Northern makers utilized slip-trailing like coating over a blue decoration. can be divided into various subgroups based techniques on many of their pieces, which Commonly produced stoneware forms of on their stylistic differences, such as clay allowed for greater detail, and an overall the nineteenth century include jars, crocks, color, and decoration used, and how the more artistic rendering. 30 March-April 2008 Bottles and Extras Although nearly all New York potters Central Pennsylvania a long-nosed face, flanked on the edge by from about 1850 to 1890 produced To the east, potteries in Central leaves. Currently, among the Central stoneware with similar cobalt motifs, many Pennsylvania, such as Cowden & Wilcox Pennsylvania marks, pieces marked makers are known for certain unique of Harrisburg, M & T Miller of Newport, “COWDEN & WILCOX” remain the most decorations that they solely developed and Evan R. Jones of Pittston, and Sipe and Son collectible. This is probably due to the sheer which they are now known for among of Williamsport, produced light-colored, variety and high quality of the decorations collectors. Potter Thompson Harrington of brightly-decorated ware similar to that of of this partnership’s ware. Some superior Lyons is admired for his “star face” potters in the North. Makers of this region examples of Cowden and Wilcox stoneware decoration, which consists of a small, slip- most often produced jug and cream jar include those decorated with a Union trailed face surrounded by several jagged forms, usually in the one to three gallon soldier’s bust, a cow, a horse head, as well rays of cobalt. Havana potter A.O. size. In addition, Central Pennsylvania as a variety of bird decorations. Whittemore, perhaps more than any potters produced a form known as the batter American maker, produced crocks pail, an ovoid vessel with a tubular spout Western Pennsylvania decorated with slip-trailed houses, in the front and a wire handle over the top. Potters in Western Pennsylvania underlined with waves, and occasionally This form is also found, on occasion, in typically made vessels in the form of small flanked by palm trees. John Burger of the work of Northern potters with sparse canning jars up to lug-handled, twenty- Rochester made pieces decorated with game cobalt decoration. Those from Central gallon crocks. The clay they used, when birds, detailed on the breast, head and back, Pennsylvania are usually heavily decorated, fired, was usually darker and denser than with numerous dots of cobalt. Noah White attractive examples of stoneware and are that of the Northern factories, ranging from of Utica commonly decorated his pots with very desirable. a medium gray to a dark brown. Unlike “paddle-tailed birds,” song birds with long, Most common among Central makers in surrounding areas, Western rounded tails heavily filled with cobalt. Pennsylvania stoneware motifs are brush- Pennsylvania potters used metal stencils, In such cases, the decorations are so decorated representations of flowers and punched with the name of their company distinctive an expert can identify the maker leaves, though local potters occasionally and town of origin, to decorate the front of of a piece without reading the maker’s decorated pieces with grapes, birds, animals their ware. Their companies’ names would mark. In other cases, decorations are more and people. Central Pennsylvania potters be accented with brush-decorated flourishes characteristic of the style of the region, rarely slip-trailed the cobalt onto their and other stenciled designs, from simple rather than a specific maker. The vessels. Pieces with such a treatment are swags and geometric patterns to detailed similarities between stoneware pieces considered rare and desirable. One motif fruit, eagles, and, in very rare cases, tavern produced in various towns, extending from prized by collectors is the so-called “man- scenes.
Recommended publications
  • Site Report: Duke Street Widening, Phase II
    A PHASE II CULTURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION OF DUKE STREET (ROUTE 236), BETWEEN THE 1100 AND 1900 BLOCKS , IN THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA by T. Ted Cromwell James Madison University Archeological Research Center Harrisonburg, VA 22807 (703) 568-6973 .J David L. Miller Principal Investigator Submitted to Virginia Department of Transportation 1221 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786-4305 Project 00236·100·107, CS01 March 1989 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSTRACT Between December 1987 and April 1988 personnel from the James Madison University Archeological Research Center (JMUARC) conducted a Phase II cultural resource evaluation along the 1100 through 1900 blocks of Duke Street (Route 236) in Alexandria, Virginia. The proposed widening of Duke Street is designed to eliminate the traffic bottleneck along the existing roadway. The project right-of-way, along the south side of Duke Streec, varies in width from 3 to 60 ft. This report will not discuss the 1500 and 1600 blocks. The 1500 block was originally bisected by a section of Hooff Run, a small feeder creek which drains into Hunting Creek and the Potomac River. The 1400 and 1600 blocks are coterminous with the creek, and the 1500 block never developed into a separate street address. The 1600 block has already been widened and required no additional archeological investigation. The Phase II investigation combined an extensive historic document search and an archeological investigation of portions of the 1100-1400 and 1700 blocks along Duke Street where archeological sites were likely to occur. The 1100 block was tested after archival research indicated the location of a Civil War period railroad complex in that block.
    [Show full text]
  • American Ceramic Circle Fall Newsletter 2015 American Ceramic Circle Fall Newsletter 2015
    AMERICAN Ceramic Circle FALL NEWSLETTER 2015 AMERICAN Ceramic Circle FALL NEWSLETTER 2015 OFFICERS OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC CIRCLE 2015 Donna Corbin CONTENTS Chairman The American Ceramic Circle (ACC) was founded in 1970 as a Anne Forschler-Tarrasch ACC TRIP TO MEXICO 5 non-profit educational organization committed to the study and President appreciation of ceramics. Its purpose is to promote scholarship Adrienne Spinozzi GRANT AWARDS 6 Vice President and research in the history, use, and preservation of ceramics of Margaret Zimmermann GRANTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS 7 Secretary all kinds, periods, and origins. The current active membership of approximately five hundred is composed of museum professionals, M. L. Coolidge PUBLICATIONS 8 Treasurer collectors, institutions, and a limited number of dealers in ceramics. Suzanne Findlen Hood CERAMIC NOTES AND RESEARCH 9 Member interest is focused on post-Medieval pottery and porcelain Administrator Anne Forschler-Tarrasch EXHIBITIONS 14 of Europe, Asian ceramics of all periods, and ceramics made, used, Symposium Chair or owned in North America. Elizabeth Williams MUSEUM INSTALLATIONS 27 Grants Chair The ACC is chartered in the State of Maine as a 501 (c) 3 Corporation and is governed by a volunteer Board of Trustees. Dorothy Cobb CONFERENCES, SYMPOSIA, AND LECTURES 30 Development Chair Amanda Lange ANNOUNCEMENTS 32 Journal Editor David Conradsen, Adrienne Spinozzi NEW ACQUISITIONS 33 Newsletter Editors Shirley Mueller PRIVATE COLLECTIONS 36 Book Award Chair Angelika Kuettner UPCOMING FAIRS AND AUCTIONS 38 Website Coordinator Barbara McRitchie Archivist Thank you for all your contributions to this edition of the Newsletter. Cover Image: One of a pair of sample plates, Dutch (Delft), ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Glazing in a Catenary Arch Kiln
    SALT GLAZING IN A CATENARY ARCH KILN by ELDON LAVERN CLARK B. F. A., University of Kansas, 1953 A MASTER' S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Art KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1966 Approved by: i#j w^,'. Major Professor ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2 History of Salt Glazing 2 Technical Aspects of Salt Glazing .... 5 Kilns 17 MATERIAL AND METHODS 19 Construction of Catenary Arch Kiln 19 Operational Procedures 29 ANALYSIS OF FIRED WARE 39 Clay Body 39 Colorants 40 Salt Mixtures 42 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 Conclusions 43 Recommendations 44 EVALUATION OF THESIS POTTERY 45 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 85 REFERENCES .86 MfLD TV c ^ INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to determine the plausibility of salt glazing in a catenary arch kiln. The study was limited to kiln construction and its operation, and to ware production which characterized the simple, direct quality inherent in salt glazing. Background material was obtained from three, major sources: library collections of Kansas State University and the University of Kansas, personal correspondence with potters who have worked with salt glazing, and personal experience. The salt-glazing process is an inexpensive means of obtaining a hard, but handsome, glaze for stoneware. The salt-glazing industry flourished in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries, and produced items such as ceramic utensils, beer mugs, and storage Jars. The industry was active in America during the colonial period. Today, however, salt glazing, on a large scale, is confined to industrial materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline in the Use and Production of Red-Earthenware Cooking Vessels in the Northeast, 1780-1880," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 42 Foodways on the Menu: Understanding the Lives of Households and Communities through the Article 7 Interpretation of Meals and Food-Related Practices 2013 Decline in the Use and Production of Red- Earthenware Cooking Vessels in the Northeast, 1780-1880 Meta F. Janowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Janowitz, Meta F. (2013) "Decline in the Use and Production of Red-Earthenware Cooking Vessels in the Northeast, 1780-1880," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 42 42, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol42/iss1/7 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol42/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. 92 Janowitz/Decline of Red–Earthenware Cooking Vessels Decline in the Use and Production of Red-Earthenware Cooking Vessels in the Northeast, 1780–1880 Meta F. Janowitz Ceramic collections from archaeological sites dating to and before the early 19th century are often dominated by red-earthenware vessels used in the foodways complex. By the late 19th century, redware vessels are much less common in New England and the Middle Atlantic region. This decline in the use and production of red earthenwares has many causes, including decreased costs of alternative materials (stoneware, refined earthenware, metal, and glass) and an awareness of the harmful effects of lead glazes, but the most important factor is the change in food-preparation technology from open-hearth to stove cooking.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Traditional Pottery Manufacture in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States Susan H
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 6 Article 2 1977 A Survey of Traditional Pottery Manufacture in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States Susan H. Myers Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Myers, Susan H. (1977) "A Survey of Traditional Pottery Manufacture in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 6 6, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol6/iss1/2 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol6/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Survey of Traditional Pottery Manufacture in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern U nit'ed States Susan H. Myers From the 17th well into the 19th century, ers of chargers with turned foot-rims also found pottery manufacture in the middle-Atlantic and at the plantation site, suggest that the Green northeastern United States remained highly tradi­ Spring potter may have been· trained in and was tional, adhering closely to the customs that immi­ emulating the majolica styles of London (Watkins grant potters brought to the New World. Prod­ 1975:279-80). ucts, made by hand processes in small, family­ Between 1688 and 1692 Englishman, Daniel operated shops, were meant largely for use in the· Coxe employed a London potter to make "white kitchen, spring house, and tavern.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN Ceramic Circle
    AMERICAN Ceramic Circle FALL NEWSLETTER 2019 The American Ceramic Circle (ACC) was founded in 1970 as a non-profit educational organization committed to the study and appreciation of ceramics. Its purpose is to promote scholarship and research in the history, use, and preservation of ceramics of all kinds, periods, and origins. The current active membership of approximately four hundred is composed of museum professionals, collectors, institutions, and a limited number of dealers in ceramics. Member interest is focused on post-Medieval pottery and porcelain of Europe, Asian ceramics of all periods, and ceramics made, used, or owned in North America. The ACC is chartered in the State of Maine as a 501 (c) 3 Corporation and is governed by a volunteer Board of Trustees. Thank you for all your contributions to this edition of the Newsletter. Please continue to send any news you would like to share with the ACC membership to David Conradsen, [email protected] and Carleigh Queenth, [email protected] AMERICAN Ceramic Circle FALL NEWSLETTER 2019 Ron Fuchs II CONTENTS Chairman Leslie Grigsby AMERICAN CERAMIC CIRCLE ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM 2 President Adrienne Spinozzi NEW STAFF PROFILE 3 Vice President Letitia Roberts SURVEY SAYS!: ACC MEMBERSHIP STUDY RESULTS 4 Secretary Deborah Miller CERAMIC NOTES AND RESEARCH Treasurer 6 Emily Campbell GRANTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS Administrator 7 Mel Buchanan Symposium Chair NEW PUBLICATIONS 11 Elizabeth Williams Grants Chair EXHIBITIONS 12 Vanessa Sigalas Journal Editor CONFERENCES, SYMPOSIA, AND LECTURES 22 David Conradsen, Carleigh Queenth ANNOUNCEMENTS 24 Newsletter Editors Amy Dehan NEW SCHOLARSHIP 25 Book Award Chair Angelika Kuettner RECENT ACQUISITIONS 26 Website Coordinator Barbara McRitchie BOARD PROFILE 33 Archivist Melissa Bennie IN MEMORIAM 34 Public Relations Chair Barbara Veith UPCOMING FAIRS AND AUCTIONS 36 Events Chair John Austin, Donna Corbin, Alice Cooney Frelinghuysen, cover: Gottfried Aust, 1722–1788, Salem, NC, Shop Sign, 1773.
    [Show full text]
  • Early American Stoneware
    Art from the Earth: Early American Stoneware May to October 14, 2012 Programs Related to this Exhibition: The Birds of Bennington Presentation | Leslie Keno on Hidden Treasures | Guy Wolff Pottery Studio Tour | Archaeological Evidence of Early Stoneware in NYC | Manhattan Stoneware Lecture and Appraisal Event This exhibit featured over one hundred pieces of uniquely decorated stoneware, made in the Northeast between 1780 and 1880, assembled by Edwin and Thayer Hochberg, in addition to pieces from David Behnke & Paul Doherty and Edward & Judith Kelz. Stoneware, known for its durability, was considered the perfect material for making sturdy household necessities such as jugs, This jug is one of only three extant Bennington crocks, jars, pots, pans and became a staple vessels made by J&E Norton depicting a horse of American life during the nineteenth (circa 1850). It is among over 100 very rare century. The elaborate and unusual cobalt pieces of stoneware displayed in this exhibit, blue designs on stoneware are the reason and is owned by Edwin and Thayer Hochberg. these once utilitarian goods are now cherished as Folk Art. The clay also lent itself to the production of more decorative items such as dolls, vases, ink bottles and figurines which are included in this display. Led by artistic director Chris Zaima and designer Sandy Booth this exhibit featured wall murals by local artists Keith Templeton and John Pitts, the former scenic artist at the Metropolitan Opera in New York City. Large and elaborate examples of stoneware were creatively displayed on beautiful antique tables, cupboards and armoires from Monique Shay Antiques of Woodbury.
    [Show full text]
  • 44FK528), Stephens City, Virginia
    THE LIFE OF A POTTER, ANDREW PITMAN Archaeological Evaluation of the Andrew Pitman Site (44FK528), Stephens City, Virginia Research Report Series No. 11 2001 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 THE LIFE OF A POTTER, ANDREW PITMAN Archaeological Evaluation of the Andrew Pitman Site (44FK528), Stephens City, Virginia Virginia Department of Historic Resources Research Report Series No. 11 Prepared by: William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795 Project Director: Dennis B. Blanton Authors: Sunyoon Park with contributions by: Matthew Laird Beverly Straube Gregory J. Brown 2001 i ABSTRACT The William and Mary Center for Archaeological Re- mately 27 ft. north-south × 18 ft. east-west and along search conducted a thorough analysis of the artifact the southern boundary of the lot, in an area measuring assemblage recovered by the James River Institute for 13 ft. north-south × 24 ft. east-west. The archaeological Archaeology and the Northern Shenandoah Chapter of investigation included eight shovel tests and eight test the Archeological Society of Virginia in 1996. The pur- units, exposing a total surface area of approximately pose of this study was to provide a better understanding 164 ft.2. An exhaustive analysis of the impressive local of the pre-industrial manufacturing activities of a pot- earthenware assemblage was conducted including a ter, Andrew Pitman, during the last quarter of the minimum vessel count and an attribute analysis of the eighteenth and first half of the nineteenth centuries. The local earthenware waster sherds within the stratigraphic Pitman house is located within the Newtown- context.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Archaeological Testing at the Schultz House
    Archaeological Testing at the Schultz House (36YO415) Springettsbury Township York County, Pennsylvania Stephen G. Warfel Archaeologist March 25, 2010 Acknowledgments I sincerely thank Historic York, Inc., especially Alycia Reiten, Executive Director, for giving me the opportunity to assist them with an exploration of the Schultz House property and become reacquainted with the colonial history of my hometown, York, Pennsylvania. Alycia also provided essential support by coordinating volunteer recruitment and schedules, purchasing equipment and supplies, and managing project budgets. The Friends of Camp Security, particularly Carol Tanzola, Christine Curran, and Rob Campbell, provided unparalleled hospitality and assistance to field crew and lab staff. Special thanks to Carol Tanzola, who regularly reached out to her many contacts in the York community for donated materials. The amount of work achieved, largely through volunteer effort, during the present project far exceeded my expectations. Sixty-two individuals donated 1,125 hours to assist with field and laboratory work. Most had no previous exposure to archaeology but all proved to be quick learners. Their enthusiasm, motivation, energy, and good company reminded me why I chose to pursue a career in archaeology. I thank all volunteers for a job well done. I also am grateful to Ben Luley, a former field school student and presently an archaeology graduate student at the University of Chicago, for his assistance while on break from his doctoral studies. Due to the shallow nature of test holes and vigorous volunteer efforts, I was overwhelmed by recording responsibilities at the start of the project. For a few days Ben helped to oversee excavation activities and record test hole soil profiles, which, in turn, gave me time to catch up with photography and site layout tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial New York City Under Both Dutch and British Control
    Chapter 6: Analytical Papers Editorial Note This chapter presents further analyses of the artifactual and ecofactual material from the excavations at City Hall Park. As opposed to Chapter 5, which presents a feature-by-feature descriptive analysis, the analyses and discussions in this chapter synthesize the data in order to present a more extended view of the institutions and inhabitants of the Common. Each section examines the remains which might be associated with a single structure of the eighteenth-century Common: the Almshouse, the Barracks, and the Gaol. Although some of the data from each report may duplicate that given in Chapter 5, the synthetic approach combines the historic sources with the archaeological material in a very different way. As a caveat, we have mentioned several times that the association of the trash features with historically-known structures may be open to question. The papers in this chapter assume that this association is valid, and base their various interpretations on this assumption. Regardless of the correctness of the assumption, the following papers complement the analyses of Chapter 5 by putting the features into their historic and societal context. The papers were written at different times between 2003 and 2007. The authors are (or were at that time) graduate students, mostly in the Department of Anthropology at the City University Graduate Center. All of the research was based on analysis of the artifacts by each author, and the papers were presented at graduate seminars, laboratory meetings, and as the final papers for independent study projects. They differ in subject matter, depth of analysis and voice, as befits the contribution of individual researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoneware of James Rhodes, 1774-1784 Richard W
    September/December 2011 Vol 12, Issue 3/4 T RENTON POTTERIES Newsletter of the Potteries of Trenton Society Trenton Makes Pottery: The Stoneware of James Rhodes, 1774-1784 Richard W. Hunter, Rebecca White and Nancy Hunter Exhibit Background: the ten-year period he was in Trenton, From mid-September 2012 virtually nothing is known of his earlier through late January 2013 the Trenton life. Museum Society is presenting an exhibit The exhibit explains the discovery at Ellarslie, the Trenton City Museum, of the kilns and the archival research, but highlighting the stoneware pottery of James focuses mostly on displaying the extraor- Rhodes, one of the few known American dinary variety of gray salt-glazed stone- stoneware potters of the colonial period. ware products made by James Rhodes. The existence of James Rhodes and Many of the items on display are frag- his distinctive wares has come to light over mentary, a result of their archaeological the past decade following the archaeological provenance. However, among the reas- discovery of two kiln sites within the City sembled vessels, visitors can view plates, of Trenton and some painstaking historical dishes, bowls, cups and saucers, tankards, research into colonial documents. First, in jugs and pitchers, coffee pots, tea pots and the spring of 2000, a pottery kiln was dis- ointment pots, along with numerous piec- covered on the Lamberton waterfront dur- es of kiln furniture. Rhodes employed ing the construction of the Route 29 tun- some signature decorative motifs that dis- nel. Some 13,000 sherds and pieces of kiln tinguish his products from those of other furniture (items used to help in stacking potters – floral designs and rough geomet- pots in the kiln during firing) were re- ric patterns, executed in naturalistic style trieved from this site.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C. Stoneware by A. Brandt Zipp
    BY A. BRANDT ZIPP Fig. 1: Jar made at Richard Butt’s pottery in Olney, MD (ca. 1826–ca. 1831), circa 1830. Impressed “R. BUTT / Monty Co. Md.” Salt-glazed stoneware. H. 12¼ in. This is the only known vessel bearing the mark “R. BUTT / Monty Co. Md.” Courtesy of a private collection. n the night of August 8, 1850, abolitionist William Chaplin attempted to carry out a plan he had successfully executed many times before—ferrying runaway slaves out of the District of Columbia, through Maryland, to freedom. The slaves in question belonged to Georgia representatives Robert Toombs, later vice president of the Confederacy, and Andrew 198 www.antiquesandfineart.com Autumn Figs. 2 & 2a: Jar with elaborate slip-trailed decoration, probably made at Richard Butt’s Olney, MD pottery (ca. 1826–ca. 1831), circa 1828. Inscribed under each handle “R. Butt.” Salt-glazed stoneware, H. 10 in. Courtesy of a private collection. Stephens, later Confederate secretary of state and army general. As Chaplin and the two men tried to cross into Montgomery County, local authorities descended on their carriage. Chaplin and the slaves opened fire, but managed little injury to the officers, the greatest wound falling to Richard Butt, a local bureaucrat who took a bullet in the arm. The Chaplin affair made national news; the abolitionist’s bullet- ridden carriage was put on display and viewed by thousands on a street corner in Washington, and stories ran in papers as far away as Wisconsin. None, however, men- tioned that Richard Butt had, some years earlier, been the proprietor of Washington’s most prolific stoneware manufactory.
    [Show full text]