Conservation Action Plan for the Albertine Rift

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Action Plan for the Albertine Rift CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE ALBERTINE RIFT A.J.Plumptre, S. Ayebare, D. Segan, J. Watson and D.Kujirakwinja June 2016 FOREWORD The Albertine Rift region is one of the most impacts of future climate change and infrastructure biodiverse parts of the World, particularly rich development. His work with collaborators in The Wildlife Conservation in vertebrates, and forms part of the Eastern different taxa has increased the number of species Society (WCS) saves wildlife and Afromontane Hotspot of Biodiversity. It is also known for the region considerably. Using this a special place for us, as our own history as a knowledge he has supported better management wild places worldwide through species started in Africa’s rift valley some 200,000 of the protected areas and worked with our national science, conservation action, years ago. I have travelled through this region and staff and local communities to establish new education, and inspiring people had the opportunity to see first hand the stunning protected areas, notably the recently established to value nature. WCS envisions scenery and some of the amazing species that Itombwe, Ngandja and Kabobo Reserves in eastern a world where wildlife thrives in are only found here such as the mountain gorilla Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). healthy lands and seas, valued and golden monkey. I have also seen the rapid changes taking place, and the need to take steps The production of this conservation action plan is by societies that embrace and to conserve this region. therefore a result of a long history of investment in benefit from the diversity and the Albertine Rift by WCS. This plan brings together integrity of life on earth. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) has been in one place the results of this work and our previous committed to protecting this region for more than work, together with the results of collaborations In the Albertine Rift region of Africa 50 years, starting with support to Queen Elizabeth with many of our conservation partners, notably WCS has supported conservation and Murchison Falls National Parks, Uganda in the protected area authorities of each country since 1957 and is the oldest 1957. George Schaller did the first field surveys (Uganda Wildlife Authority, Rwanda Development of Mountain Gorillas in 1959-60, followed by the Board, Institute Nationale de l’Environnement et International Conservation NGO work by Bill Weber and Amy Vedder. Their research Conservation de la Nature in Burundi, Institute working here. Our focus has been on provided the basis for one of the great conservation Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature in building the capacity of the protected stories, as the populations of Mountain Gorillas DRC and Tanzania National Parks) together with area authorities in the region to have increased thanks to a partnership between our international partners (Jane Goodall Institute, better manage their protected areas, governments, conservation groups and tourism. World Wide Fund for Nature, International Gorilla and sharing scientific research to This provided the foundation for a model that Conservation Programme, Fauna and Flora has been replicated across Africa: use science to International, African Wildlife Foundation) and better understand the importance identify areas important for conservation, establish many national NGOs in each country. These of the Albertine Rift and how protected areas and work with governments and partners were involved in the development of best to conserve the incredibly local communities to support their management. some of each of the landscape plans summarised rich biodiversity found here. Examples include the establishment of Nyungwe here and are involved in collaborative projects to Find more at www.albertinerift.org; as Rwanda’s third national park, thanks to the implement these plans. The plan identifies priority www.wcsuganda.org; work of Michel Masozera and Ian Munanura, and areas for conservation within these landscapes and www.wcs.org the creation of the Kibale, Rwenzori Mountains, both now and under future climate change. As Semuliki and Bwindi Impenetrable National the world is changing, so must our conservation Parks in Uganda, supported by the work of Tom strategies and actions on the ground. Struhsaker, Tom Butynski and Peter Howard. WCS is committed to supporting the implementation Our work in the Albertine Rift region has been led of this action plan and will be working through each by Andrew Plumptre, who had worked as Assistant of our Country Programs and with partners in the Director for our Africa Program, and moved to the region to ensure that the amazing diversity of life to region in 2000 to coordinate and expand our work. be found here is conserved for future generations. Over the subsequent 16 years he has undertaken biodiversity surveys to better identify the critical Cristián Samper, CEO Wildlife Conservation Society areas for conservation in this region and potential New York, December 2016 Citation: Plumptre, A.J., Ayebare, S., Segan, D., Watson, J. & Kujirakwinja, D. (2016). Conservation Action Plan for the Albertine Rift. Unpublished Report for Wildlife Conservation Society and its Partners Front and back cover photos: A.Plumptre/WCS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Albertine Rift is known to be one of the most known from this region. Scenarios were modelled Foreword ............................................................................................ 3 Summary Analysis of Landscape Plans ................................................. 50 biodiverse regions on the African continent, having using the software Marxan to assess where best Executive Summary .............................................................................. 4 Conservation Planning for the Albertine Rift .......................................... 52 been designated an endemic bird area (Stattersfield to conserve these species, and these identify Table of Contents ................................................................................. 5 Conservation planning methods ..................................................... 52 et al.1998), a Global 200 Priority Ecoregion (Olson conservation action needs to focus outside the The Albertine Rift ................................................................................. 7 Marxan analysis for Albertine Rift ................................................... 52 and Dinerstein, 1998; Burgess et al., 2004) and existing protected areas. Critical areas identified IUCN mapping of species richness across the Albertine Rift ...............10 Modelling species distributions ................................................ 52 part of the Eastern Afromontane Hotspot (Brooks were the Itombwe and Kabobo Massifs in south Landscapes of the Albertine Rift ...........................................................12 Predictor variables .................................................................. 54 et al.,2004). The richness of vertebrate and plant eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Strategic Framework Plan ..............................................................12 Modeling methods .................................................................. 54 taxa have been documented in the past (Plumptre Tayna-Kisimba-Ikobo region and proposed Oku Development of Albertine Rift Conservation Action Plan ....................12 Scenarios for conservation planning .......................................... 55 et al. 2003; 2007a) and in 2003 we estimated Community Reserve in eastern DRC, and the Sitebi Landscape 1: Murchison-Semliki Landscape ..........................................15 Where to conserve if all costs equal ............................................... 56 that there were about 5,793 plant species and highlands east of the Mahale Mountains National Description of Landscape ...............................................................15 All species ..............................................................................57 1,757 terrestrial vertebrate species known for the Park in western Tanzania. Significant conservation Biodiversity ..................................................................................15 Threatened and endemic species ..............................................57 region. More thorough surveys, identification of activities have already been under way to establish Threats to Landscape ....................................................................18 Where to conserve outside the existing protected area network ......... 58 new species and the finding of additional records Itombwe Reserve, Ngandja Reserve and Kabobo Conservation plan for landscape .....................................................18 All species ............................................................................. 58 for plants have increased these numbers to 6,568 Reserve in the Itombwe and Kabobo massifs Conceptual model ...................................................................18 Threatened and endemic species ............................................. 59 plants and 1,833 terrestrial vertebrates and more while more needs to be done to conserve the Key strategies and objectives ................................................... 20 Where to conserve in the face of future developments ...................... 59 species are being discovered and described every other sites. Mining is a significant emerging threat Landscape 2: Greater Virunga Landscape ............................................
Recommended publications
  • The Status of Biodiversity in Echuya Central Forest Reserve, Sw Uganda
    THE STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY IN ECHUYA CENTRAL FOREST RESERVE, SW UGANDA By Assoc. Prof. Robert Bitariho (PhD) - Project Leader Dr Dennis Babaasa (PhD) - Specialist small mammals, birds and vegetation Badru Mugerwa (MSc) - Specialist Large mammals/camera trapping Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, Mbarara University of Science and Technology A Report to Nature Uganda November 2015 1 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF TABLES 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 1. INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Study Rationale 12 2. OVERALL AIM AND STUDY OBJECTIVES 13 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 13 3.1 Large mammals diversity and distribution 13 3.2 Small mammal, bird and plant diversity and distribution 14 3.3. Data analysis 16 4.0 RESULTS 19 4.1 Large mammals diversity and distribution 19 4.2 Environmental variables along the transects 27 4.3 Small mammal diversity and distribution 27 4.4 Diversity and distribution of birds 36 4.5 Diversity and distribution of trees 46 4.6 Diversity and distribution of shrubs and herbs 55 4.6 Distribution of human activities 59 2 5.0 DISCUSSION 65 5.1Diversity and distribution of large mammals 65 5.2 Diversity and distribution of small mammals 68 5.3 Diversity and distribution of birds 69 5.4 Diversity and distribution of trees 70 5.4 Diversity and distribution of shrubs and herbs 72 5.5 Distribution of human activities 72 5.6 Conclusion 73 5.7 Specific Recommendations 74 6. REFERENCES 76 7 APPENDICES 82 3 Acknowledgements We would like to thank Nature Uganda (NU) for initiating and funding this survey, in particular we would like to thank Achilles Byaruhanga (NU-Executive Director) for making crucial comments on the research proposal methods that shaped up this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopetitia Aspiculata Sp. N. (Spirurida) from Coerulea Coerulea and Other Imported Birds in the National Zoological Park, Washington, D
    64 • PROCEEDINGS OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY Geopetitia aspiculata sp. n. (Spirurida) from Coerulea coerulea and Other Imported Birds in the National Zoological Park, Washington, D. C.1 W. A. WEBSTER Animal Pathology Division, Health of Animals Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Animal Diseases Research Institute, P. O. Box 1400, Hull, Quebec, Canada ABSTRACT: Geopetitia aspiculata sp. n. from Coerulea coerulea is described, figured, and compared with the other species of the genus. Additional specimens from various other exotic birds were examined in order to gain information on specific morphological characters available for the separation of those species presently assigned to the genus. It is concluded that the presence or absence of spicules, and if present their morphology, and the distribution pattern of the genital papillae in the male are the only two charac- ters so far described which are useful for species determination. During the examination of unidentified hel- 260 (240). Oesophagus divided into muscular minths that had been collected from various and glandular regions 200-275 (235) and 728- exotic birds housed at the National Zoological 840 (796) long respectively. Nerve ring and Park, Washington, D. C., and deposited in the excretory pore 150-195 (169) and 170-260 USNM Helminth Collection, several spirurid (213) respectively from anterior extremity. nematodes of the genus Geopetitia Chabaud, Anus 140-170 (154) from posterior extremity, 1951 were observed. These specimens are bounded both anteriorly and posteriorly by a unusual in that no evidence of a spicule in small cuticular inflation. Spicules, gubernac- the male can be demonstrated. Since those ulum and caudal alae absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Covenants
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 211 CONSERVATION COVENANTS A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod QC and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the case for introducing “conservation covenants” into the law of England and Wales, and considers how a scheme of conservation covenants might be framed. A conservation covenant is a private agreement made by a landowner, for the purposes of conservation. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and options for reform on which we invite consultees’ views. Geographical scope: The Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 9 of this Consultation Paper, consultees are asked also to comment on the likely costs and benefits of any changes provisionally proposed. Consultees’ responses will inform our final recommendations and a formal impact assessment document that will be published with our Report. Availability of materials: This Consultation is available on our website at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/conservation-covenants.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 28 March 2013 to 21 June 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to: [email protected] or By post to: Luke Campbell, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element of the General Plan
    General Plan Land Use Element Adopted December 15, 1993 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended July 22, 2015 Amended July 26, 2016 Amended April 26, 2017 Amended September 26, 2017 Amended December 13, 2017 Amended December 17, 2019 Amended October 6, 2020 County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review . This page is blank County of Sacramento General Plan Land Use Element Amended October 6, 2020 Table of Contents SECTION I ..................................................................................................................................... 1 ELEMENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Required Contents of the Land Use Element .............................................................................. 1 Concepts of the Land Use Element ............................................................................................. 1 Relationship to Other Elements .................................................................................................. 2 Relationship to Other County Planning Tools ............................................................................ 3 Relationship to Regional Planning Efforts ................................................................................. 6 THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM ......................................................................... 7 How to Use the Land Use Diagram ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Congolius, a New Genus of African Reed Frog Endemic to The
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Congolius, a new genus of African reed frog endemic to the central Congo: A potential case of convergent evolution Tadeáš Nečas1,2*, Gabriel Badjedjea3, Michal Vopálenský4 & Václav Gvoždík1,5* The reed frog genus Hyperolius (Afrobatrachia, Hyperoliidae) is a speciose genus containing over 140 species of mostly small to medium-sized frogs distributed in sub-Saharan Africa. Its high level of colour polymorphism, together with in anurans relatively rare sexual dichromatism, make systematic studies more difcult. As a result, the knowledge of the diversity and taxonomy of this genus is still limited. Hyperolius robustus known only from a handful of localities in rain forests of the central Congo Basin is one of the least known species. Here, we have used molecular methods for the frst time to study the phylogenetic position of this taxon, accompanied by an analysis of phenotype based on external (morphometric) and internal (osteological) morphological characters. Our phylogenetic results undoubtedly placed H. robustus out of Hyperolius into a common clade with sympatric Cryptothylax and West African Morerella. To prevent the uncovered paraphyly, we place H. robustus into a new genus, Congolius. The review of all available data suggests that the new genus is endemic to the central Congolian lowland rain forests. The analysis of phenotype underlined morphological similarity of the new genus to some Hyperolius species. This uniformity of body shape (including cranial shape) indicates that the two genera have either retained ancestral morphology or evolved through convergent evolution under similar ecological pressures in the African rain forests. African reed frogs, Hyperoliidae Laurent, 1943, are presently encompassing almost 230 species in 17 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Status, Trends and Future Dynamics of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Underpinning Nature’S Contributions to People 1
    CHAPTER 3 . STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PEOPLE 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS CHAPTER OF BIODIVERSITY AND 3 ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS CHAPTER TO PEOPLE 4 Coordinating Lead Authors Review Editors: Marie-Christine Cormier-Salem (France), Jonas Ngouhouo-Poufoun (Cameroon) Amy E. Dunham (United States of America), Christopher Gordon (Ghana) 3 CHAPTER This chapter should be cited as: Cormier-Salem, M-C., Dunham, A. E., Lead Authors Gordon, C., Belhabib, D., Bennas, N., Dyhia Belhabib (Canada), Nard Bennas Duminil, J., Egoh, B. N., Mohamed- (Morocco), Jérôme Duminil (France), Elahamer, A. E., Moise, B. F. E., Gillson, L., 5 Benis N. Egoh (Cameroon), Aisha Elfaki Haddane, B., Mensah, A., Mourad, A., Mohamed Elahamer (Sudan), Bakwo Fils Randrianasolo, H., Razaindratsima, O. H., Eric Moise (Cameroon), Lindsey Gillson Taleb, M. S., Shemdoe, R., Dowo, G., (United Kingdom), Brahim Haddane Amekugbe, M., Burgess, N., Foden, W., (Morocco), Adelina Mensah (Ghana), Ahmim Niskanen, L., Mentzel, C., Njabo, K. Y., CHAPTER Mourad (Algeria), Harison Randrianasolo Maoela, M. A., Marchant, R., Walters, M., (Madagascar), Onja H. Razaindratsima and Yao, A. C. Chapter 3: Status, trends (Madagascar), Mohammed Sghir Taleb and future dynamics of biodiversity (Morocco), Riziki Shemdoe (Tanzania) and ecosystems underpinning nature’s 6 contributions to people. In IPBES (2018): Fellow: The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Gregory Dowo (Zimbabwe) Africa. Archer, E., Dziba, L., Mulongoy, K. J., Maoela, M. A., and Walters, M. (eds.). CHAPTER Contributing Authors: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Millicent Amekugbe (Ghana), Neil Burgess Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity (United Kingdom), Wendy Foden (South and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, Africa), Leo Niskanen (Finland), Christine pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Itombwe Massif, Democratic Republic of Congo: Biological Surveys and Conservation, with an Emphasis on Grauer's Gorilla and Birds Endemic to the Albertine Rift
    Oryx Voi 33 No 4 October -.939 The Itombwe Massif, Democratic Republic of Congo: biological surveys and conservation, with an emphasis on Grauer's gorilla and birds endemic to the Albertine Rift llambu Omari, John A. Hart, Thomas M. Butynski, N. R. Birhashirwa, Agenonga Upoki, Yuma M'Keyo, Faustin Bengana, Mugunda Bashonga and Norbert Bagurubumwe Abstract In 1996, the first major biological surveys in species were recorded during the surveys, including the the Itombwe Massif in over 30 years revealed that sig- Congo bay owl Phodilus prigoginei, which was previously nificant areas of natural habitat and remnant faunal known from a single specimen collected in Itombwe populations remain, but that these are subject to ongo- nearly 50 years ago. No part of Itombwe is officially ing degradation and over-exploitation. At least 10 areas protected and conservation initiatives are needed ur- of gorilla Gorilla gorilla graueri occurrence, including gently. Given the remoteness and continuing political eight of 17 areas identified during the first survey of the instability of the region, conservation initiatives must species in the massif in 1959, were found. Seventy-nine collaborate with traditional authorities based in the gorilla nest sites were recorded and at least 860 gorillas massif, and should focus at the outset on protecting the were estimated to occupy the massif. Fifty-six species of gorillas and limiting further degradation of key areas. mammals were recorded. Itombwe supports the highest representation, of any area, of bird species endemic to Keywords Afromontane forests, Albertine Rift, Demo- the Albertine Rift highlands. Twenty-two of these cratic Republic of Congo, endemic avifauna, gorillas.
    [Show full text]
  • Albertine Rift Nov04
    africa & madagascar "meeting the challenge" Albertine Rift Montane Forests Ecoregion Programme 1. Background Duration: The Albertine Rift Montane Forests Ecoregion is an area of Current phase is 5 exceptional faunal and floral endemism. These afromontane years, from 2001 to forests also support many endangered species such as the 2005. Mountain and Eastern Lowland gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei and G. b. graueri ), which are among the most charismatic Funding Status: flagship species in Africa, and an effective target for much of the Partly funded by WWF- current conservation investment in the area. DK and SE (25%); the remaining is yet to be The mountain chain comprising the Albertine Rift straddles the funded (currently borders of five different nations: Democratic Republic of Congo covered through Direct (over 70% of the Ecoregion), Uganda (20%), Rwanda (6%), Burundi Cost Recovery). (3%) and Tanzania (1%). Executing Agency: The Albertine Rift has been identified by all key international WWF Eastern Africa conservation NGOs as a top priority area for biodiversity Regional Programme conservation in Africa and the Ecoregion is a priority Ecoregion for Office (WWF EARPO). WWF-International. 2. Goal and Objectives The Goal of the Albertine Rift Ecoregion Programme is to ensure the long-term conservation of the Albertine Rift Montane Forests and other important interconnected ecosystems. The objectives are: ? To develop a strategic framework for conservation efforts in the ecoregion with a wide variety of stakeholders ? To implement and co-ordinate a set of comprehensive and inter-related field projects in the Albertine Rift ? To support national authorities in the planning and management of protected areas and buffer zones 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Virunga Landscape
    23. Virunga Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Coordinates: 1°1’29’’N – 1°44’21’’S – 28°56’11’’E – 30°5’2’’E. Area: 15,155 km2 Elevation: 680–5,119 m Terrestrial ecoregions: Ecoregion of the Afroalpine barrens of Ruwenzori-Virunga Ecoregion of the Afromontane forests of the Albertine Rift Ecoregion of the forest-savannah mosaic of Lake Victoria Aquatic ecoregions: Mountains of the Albertine Rift Lakes Kivu, Edward, George and Victoria Protected areas: Virunga National Park, DRC, 772,700 ha, 1925 Volcans National Park, Rwanda, 16,000 ha, 1925 Rutshuru Hunting Domain, 64,200 ha, 1946 added Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park situ- ated a short distance away from the volcanoes in southwest Uganda. Th is complex functions as a single ecosystem and many animals move across the borders, which permits restoration of the populations1. Physical environment Relief and altitude Th e Landscape is focused on the central trough of the Albertine Rift, occupied by Lake Figure 23.1. Map of Virunga Landscape (Sources: CARPE, Edward (916 m, 2,240 km²), and vast plains DFGFI, JRC, SRTM, WWF-EARPO). at an altitude of between 680 and 1,450 m. Its western edge stretches along the eastern bluff of Location and area the Mitumba Mountain Range forming the west- ern ridge of the rift. In the northeast, it includes he Virunga Landscape covers 15,155 km² the western bluff of the Ruwenzori horst (fault Tand includes two contiguous national parks, block) with its active glaciers, whose peak reaches Virunga National Park in DRC and Volcans a height of 5,119 m and whose very steep relief National Park in Rwanda, the Rutshuru Hunting comprises numerous old glacial valleys (Figure Zone and a 10 km-wide strip at the edge of the 23.2).
    [Show full text]