DOCSLIB.ORG

Bandelier National Monument Fire Management Plan 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bandelier National Monument Fire Management Plan 2005 Bandelier National Monument Photo by: K. Honig Fire Management Plan 2005 Fire Management Plan Bandelier National Monument ii Fire Management Plan Bandelier National Monument I. Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 A. Need for a Fire Management Plan .................................................. 5 B. Bandelier National Monument........................................................ 6 C. Compliance Actions ........................................................................ 9 D. Collaboration.................................................................................. 9 E. Authorities Under Which This Plan is Developed.......................... 10 II. Relationship to Land Management Planning/Fire Policy........................ 10 A. National Level Regulations and Policies..................................... 10 National Park Service Management Policies ................................. 11 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy .................................... 11 Other Relevant Regulations and Policies ...................................... 14 B. Relationship of Bandelier’s Fire Management Plan to other Bandelier Plans................................................................................. 15 III. Wildland Fire Management Goals and Strategies................................. 16 A. General Management Considerations ........................................ 16 B. Wildland Fire Management Goals ........................................... 16 C. Wildland Fire Management Options ........................................... 19 Fire suppression ............................................................................ 19 Wildland Fire Use .......................................................................... 20 Prescribed fire ............................................................................... 20 Non-fire fuel treatments ............................................................... 20 Adaptive management .................................................................. 21 Fire Ecology Program .................................................................... 21 Fire monitoring.............................................................................. 22 D. Description of Wildland Fire Management Strategies by Fire Management Unit (FMU) 22 E. Bandelier Fuel Types and Desired Future Conditions ................... 26 IV. Wildland Fire Management Program Components................................. 39 A. General Implementation Procedures ........................................... 39 B. Wildland Fire Suppression............................................................ 39 1. Range of Potential Fire Behavior............................................... 39 2. Preparedness............................................................................. 42 a) Interagency planning and cooperation.................................. 42 b) Training.................................................................................. 43 c) Annual Preparedness Activities.............................................. 44 d) Fire Weather and Fire Danger................................................ 45 e) Staffing Plan .......................................................................... 46 f) Bandelier Dispatch Plan for fire reporting .............................. 47 g) Aviation Management Plan .................................................... 47 3. Pre-attack plan.......................................................................... 47 4. Initial Attack (IA) ...................................................................... 48 a) Initial Attack Priority Setting................................................. 48 b) Criteria for Appropriate Initial Attack Response ................... 48 c) Confinement as an Initial Attack Strategy............................. 49 1 Fire Management Plan Bandelier National Monument d) Typical Response Times......................................................... 49 e) Restrictions and Special Concerns ......................................... 50 5. Extended Attack and Large Fire Suppression ............................ 53 a) Determining Extended Attack Needs ..................................... 53 b) Wildland Fire Situation Analysis ............................................ 54 c) Complexity Decision Process.................................................. 54 d) Delegation of Authority ......................................................... 55 6. Exceeding existing WFIP........................................................... 55 7. Minimum Impact Suppression Tactics....................................... 55 8. Rehabilitation Guidelines .......................................................... 55 9. Reporting and Documentation .................................................. 56 C. Wildland Fire Use.......................................................................... 56 1. Objectives of WFU ..................................................................... 56 2. Parameters ................................................................................ 57 3. Pre-planning.............................................................................. 58 4. Implementation Procedures...................................................... 58 5. Potential Impacts ...................................................................... 58 6. WFU Organization ..................................................................... 58 7. Public Information and Interpretation...................................... 59 8. Reporting and Documentation .................................................. 60 D. Prescribed Fire ............................................................................. 60 1. Planning and Documentation .................................................... 60 a) Annual Activities .................................................................... 61 b) Long-term Strategy ............................................................... 61 c) Prescribed Fire Organization.................................................. 64 d) Monitoring ............................................................................. 64 e) Evaluation .............................................................................. 64 f) Reporting and Documentation ............................................... 65 h) Local Burn Plan Requirements............................................... 66 2. Exceeding Prescription.............................................................. 67 3. Air Quality and Smoke Management ......................................... 67 E. Non-Fire Fuel Applications............................................................ 69 1. Annual Activities........................................................................ 69 2. Special Considerations and Restrictions ................................... 69 3. Monitoring ................................................................................. 69 4. Evaluation.................................................................................. 70 5. Reporting and Documentation .................................................. 70 6. Historic Treatments................................................................... 70 F. Emergency Rehabilitation and Restoration .................................. 70 G. Adaptive Management ................................................................. 71 V. Organization and Administration............................................................. 71 A. Roles and Responsibilities.......................................................... 71 B. Interagency Coordination ....................................................... 72 C. Fire Program Funding................................................................. 73 2 Fire Management Plan Bandelier National Monument D. Updates and Reviews.............................................................. 73 VI. Monitoring and Evaluation ..................................................................... 73 VII. Fire Research........................................................................................ 74 VIII. Public Safety ....................................................................................... 74 IX. Information and Education .................................................................... 75 X. Protection of Sensitive Resources ........................................................... 77 A. Mitigation measures: natural resources....................................... 77 B. Mitigation measures: Cultural resources...................................... 84 MOA with the State Historic Preservation Office........................... 85 C. Mitigation measures: fire retardant ............................................. 87 D. Mitigation measures: wilderness ................................................. 87 E. Mitigation measures: air quality................................................... 87 F. Mitigation measures: unplanned fire events ................................ 88 XI. Fire Critiques and Annual Review .......................................................... 88 XII. Consultation and Coordination ............................................................. 88 XIII. Appendices.......................................................................................... 89 A. References Cited .......................................................................... 90 B. Glossary.......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Fire Ecology July 1.Qxd
    Investigating Fire Ecology in Ponderosa Pine Forests 2004/First Edition A Field Guide for Sixth Grade Teachers This project was made possible by generous contributions of: Publishing Information This curriculum guide was created with funding from the NPS Fire Program and Challenge Cost Share Programs. Funding for implementation was provided by the NPS Parks As Classrooms program. All right s are not reserved. Materials in this guide may be reproduced by teachers for classroom use i.e., student handout s, transp arencies, etc. All right s are reserved for all other uses. The listing of a resource in this curriculum does not presume it s endorsement by the National Park Service. This guide may be obtained by p articip ating in a teacher workshop or by visiting the Bandelier website at www.nps.gov/band. Teachers are encouraged to offer their feedback by filling out the enclosed evaluation form or con - tacting the VTF or WPS directly. Printed on recycled p aper using soy-based inks. PREFACE hen the more than 18,000 residents of Los Alamos, New Mexico awoke W on May 6, 2000, they were unaware that within the next ninety-six hours their sleepy, relaxed mount ainside community would be forever changed. A small wildland fire approximately five miles southwest of town was rapidly growing. The fire was named for the peak of it s origin, Cerro Grande. As resident s uneasily watched the column of smoke rising from the thickly forested backdrop to town, over the next days firefighters battled the blaze with mixed success. On the morning of Wednesday, May 10th, represent atives of a wide range of government agencies, including New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, visited Los Alamos to assess the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Regimes Approaching Historic Norms Reduce Wildfire-Facilitated
    Fire regimes approaching historic norms reduce wildfire-facilitated conversion from forest to non-forest 1, 1 2 3 RYAN B. WALKER, JONATHAN D. COOP, SEAN A. PARKS, AND LAURA TRADER 1School of Environment and Sustainability, Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, Colorado 81231 USA 2Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, Montana 59801 USA 3Fire Ecology Program, Bandelier National Monument, National Park Service, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 USA Citation: Walker, R. B., J. D. Coop, S. A. Parks, and L. Trader. 2018. Fire regimes approaching historic norms reduce wildfire-facilitated conversion from forest to non-forest. Ecosphere 9(4):e02182. 10.1002/ecs2.2182 Abstract. Extensive high-severity wildfires have driven major losses of ponderosa pine and mixed-coni- fer forests in the southwestern United States, in some settings catalyzing enduring conversions to non- forested vegetation types. Management interventions to reduce the probability of stand-replacing wildfire have included mechanical fuel treatments, prescribed fire, and wildfire managed for resource benefit. In 2011, the Las Conchas fire in northern New Mexico burned forested areas not exposed to fire for >100 yr, but also reburned numerous prescribed fire units and/or areas previously burned by wildfire. At some sites, the combination of recent prescribed fire and wildfire approximated known pre-settlement fire fre- quency, with two or three exposures to fire between 1977 and 2007. We analyzed gridded remotely sensed burn severity data (differenced normalized burn ratio), pre- and post-fire field vegetation samples, and pre- and post-fire measures of surface fuels to assess relationships and interactions between prescribed fire, prior wildfire, fuels, subsequent burn severity, and patterns of post-fire forest retention vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandoval County, New Mexico Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    Sandoval County Community Wildre Protection Plan August 2012 Submitted by: SANDOVAL COUNTY, NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared for 314 Melissa Road P.O. Box 40 Bernalillo, New Mexico 87004 Prepared by SWCA® ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 5647 Jefferson Street NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 Telephone: 505-254-1115; Fax: 505-254-1116 www.swca.com Victoria Amato, M.S. Cody Stropki, Ph.D. SWCA Project No. 17646 August 2012 Sandoval County Community Wildfire Protection Plan This is a 2012 update to the 2008 Sandoval County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (SCCWPP), which addresses hazards and risks of wildland fire throughout Sandoval County and makes recommendations for fuels reduction projects, public outreach and education, structural ignitability reduction, and fire response capabilities. Sandoval County comprises a diverse landscape and landownership, but a population with one common concern, the need to prepare for wildfire to reduce the risk of loss of life and property. Community members in Sandoval County are familiar with large fires as several have occurred in recent years. The most significant was the Los Conchas fire, the second largest fire in New Mexico history and the largest ever fire in Sandoval County. Prior to that the Cerro Grande Fire (2003) started in Sandoval County and, until Los Conchas (2011) and later the Whitewater-Baldy Complex (2012), was the largest fire in state history. This SCCWPP has been developed to assist Sandoval County in ensuring that a catastrophic wildfire will be avoided in the future by assessing areas at risk and recommending measures to decrease that risk. The purpose of the SCCWPP is to assist in protecting human life and reducing property loss due to wildfire throughout Sandoval County.
    [Show full text]
  • Postwildfire Preliminary Debris Flow Hazard Assessment for the Area Burned by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire in North-Central New Mexico
    Postwildfire Preliminary Debris Flow Hazard Assessment for the Area Burned by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire in North-Central New Mexico Open-File Report 2011–1308 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Postwildfire Preliminary Debris Flow Hazard Assessment for the Area Burned by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire in North-Central New Mexico By Anne C. Tillery, Michael J. Darr, Susan H. Cannon, and John A. Michael Open-File Report 2011–1308 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Tillery, A.C., Darr, M.J., Cannon, S.H., and Michael, J.A., 2011, Postwildfire preliminary debris flow hazard assessment for the area burned by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire in north-central New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1308, 11 p. Frontispiece: Satellite view of Las Conchas Fire (photos by NASA), canyon slopes burned in Bandelier National Monument (photo by National Park Service), valley floor of areas burned in Bandelier National Monument (photo by National Park Service).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report, Project Number 06-2-1-05
    ARCBURN: LINKING FIELD-BASED AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS TO QUANTIFY, PREDICT, AND MANAGE FIRE EFFECTS ON CULTURAL RESOURCES ArcBurn: Quantify, predict, and manage fire effects on cultural resources ArcBurn: Linking Field-Based and Experimental Methods to Quantify, Predict, and Manage Fire Effects on Cultural Resources JFSP Project ID: 12-1-04-5 Principal investigator: Rachel Loehman, USGS Alaska Science Center, [email protected], (907) 786-7089 Co-Investigators: Bret Butler, US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab Jamie Civitello, National Park Service, Bandelier National Monument Connie Constan, US Forest Service, Santa Fe National Forest, Jemez Ranger District Jennifer Dyer, US Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest Zander Evans, Forest Stewards Guild Megan Friggens, US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Grassland, Shrubland, and Desert Ecosystems Rebekah Kneifel, US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab Jim Reardon, US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab Madeline Scheintaub, National Park Service, Valles Caldera National Preserve Anastasia Steffen, National Park Service, Valles Caldera National Preserve Front cover-Top: Fire spread during the Pino Fire, August 2014, Santa Fe National Forest. The ArcBurn project conducted in-field monitoring at archaeological rubble mound sites as part of the Southwest Jemez Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project. Left: Rubble mound, post-fire. Center: Ceramic artifacts, post-fire. Right:
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Prior Wildfires on Vegetation Response to Subsequent Fire in a Reburned Southwestern Landscape
    Communications Ecological Applications, 26(2), 2016, pp. 346–354 © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America Influences of prior wildfires on vegetation response to subsequent fire in a reburned Southwestern landscape JONATHAN D. COOP,1,3 SEAN A. PARKS,2 SARAH R. MCCLERNAN,1 AND LISA M. HOLSINGER2 1Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, Colorado 81231 USA 2Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, Montana 59801 USA Abstract. Large and severe wildfires have raised concerns about the future of forested landscapes in the southwestern United States, especially under repeated burning. In 2011, under extreme weather and drought conditions, the Las Conchas fire burned over several previous burns as well as forests not recently exposed to fire. Our purpose was to examine the influences of prior wildfires on plant community composition and structure, subsequent burn severity, and vegetation response. To assess these relationships, we used satellite- derived measures of burn severity and a nonmetric multidimensional scaling of pre- and post- Las Conchas field samples. Earlier burns were associated with shifts from forested sites to open savannas and meadows, oak scrub, and ruderal communities. These non- forested vegetation types exhibited both resistance to subsequent fire, measured by reduced burn severity, and resilience to reburning, measured by vegetation recovery relative to forests not exposed to recent prior fire. Previous shifts toward non- forested states were strongly reinforced by reburning. Ongoing losses of forests and their ecological values confirm the need for res- toration interventions. However, given future wildfire and climate projections, there may also be opportunities presented by transformations toward fire-resistant and resilient vegetation types within portions of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Foundation Report, Bandelier National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Water Resources Foundation Report Bandelier National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/060 ON THE COVER Photograph: Frijoles Canyon, Bandelier National Monument (Don Weeks - NPS Water Resources Division, 2007) Water Resources Foundation Report Bandelier National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/060 Don Weeks National Park Service Water Resources Division P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 October 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer- reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vegetation Response to Wildfire at Bandelier National
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Geography ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Winter 12-19-2017 Assessment of Vegetation Response to Wildfire at Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico: Case Study of the Las Conchas Fire Gladys Valentin-Gonzalez University of New Mexico Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/geog_etds Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Valentin-Gonzalez, Gladys. "Assessment of Vegetation Response to Wildfire at Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico: Case Study of the Las Conchas Fire." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/geog_etds/38 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gladys Valentin – Gonzalez Candidate Geography & Environmental Studies Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Thesis Committee: Caitlin L. Lippitt, Chairperson Christopher D. Lippitt Craig D. Allen i ASSESSMENT OF VEGETATION RESPONSE TO WILDFIRE AT BANDELIER NATIONAL MONUMENT, NEW MEXICO: CASE STUDY OF THE LAS CONCHAS FIRE BY GLADYS VALENTIN-GONZALEZ B.A. in Geography, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras 2014 THESIS To be Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Geography The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May 2018 ii © 2018 Gladys Valentin-Gonzalez iii Dedication To my beloved nieces and nephews, my little beams of sunshine, Mandy, Vanchi, Kike, Kini, Nico, Vivi and x To my parents, Julian and Gladys, and my siblings Vanessa, Julio E.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wildfire and Postfire Floods on Stonefly Detritivores of the Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 71 Number 2 Article 13 8-12-2011 Effects of wildfire and postfire floods on stonefly detritivores of the Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico Nicole K. M. Vieira Colorado State University, Fort Collins and Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, [email protected] Tiffany R. Barnes Colorado State University, Fort Collins, [email protected] Katharine A. Mitchell Colorado State University, Fort Collins, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Vieira, Nicole K. M.; Barnes, Tiffany R.; and Mitchell, Katharine A. (2011) "Effects of wildfire and postfire floods on stonefly detritivores of the Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 71 : No. 2 , Article 13. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol71/iss2/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 71(2), © 2011, pp. 257–270 EFFECTS OF WILDFIRE AND POSTFIRE FLOODS ON STONEFLY DETRITIVORES OF THE PAJARITO PLATEAU, NEW MEXICO Nicole K. M. Vieira1,2,3, Tiffany R. Barnes1, and Katharine A. Mitchell1 ABSTRACT.—Wildfires alter the quantity and quality of allochthonous detritus in streams by burning riparian vegetation and through flushing during postfire floods. As such, fire disturbance may negatively affect detritivorous insects that consume coarse organic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Postwildfire Debris-Flow Hazards— a Prewildfire Evaluation for the Jemez Mountains, North-Central New Mexico
    Prepared in cooperation with the Buckman Direct Diversion Board, U.S. Forest Service, Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Los Alamos County Potential Postwildfire Debris-Flow Hazards— A Prewildfire Evaluation for the Jemez Mountains, North-Central New Mexico Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5101 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph of debris flow in small tributary to Frijoles Canyon, Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico. Photograph by Barbara Judy, National Park Service, May 2015. Potential Postwildfire Debris-Flow Hazards— A Prewildfire Evaluation for the Jemez Mountains, North-Central New Mexico By Anne C. Tillery and Jessica R. Haas Prepared in cooperation with the Buckman Direct Diversion Board, U.S. Forest Service, Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Los Alamos County Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5101 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • LA-UR-01-4658, Estimation of Soil Erosion in Burnt Forest Areas of The
    a $3Q? LA-UR- Approved for public release; distributionis unlimited. Title: Estimation of Soil Erosion in Burnt Forest Areas of the Cerro Grande Fire in Los Alamos, New Mexico Author@): John W. Nyhan, ESH-20 Steven W. Koch, ESHPO Randy G. Balice, ESH-20 Samuel R. Loftin, ESH-20 SubmiYted to: Catena Los Alamos NATIONAL LABORATORY Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative actionlequal opportunity employer, is operated by the Universityof California for the US. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizesthat the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-freelicense to publish or reproduce the publishedform ofthis contribution, or to allow others to do so, for US. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the US.Department of Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratorystrongly supports academic freedom and a researcher'sright to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratorydoes not endorse theviewpoint of a publicationor guarantee its technical correctness. Form 836 (8/00) Estimation of soil erosion in burnt forest areas of the Cerro Grande Fire in Los Alamos, New Mexico John W. Nyhana3*, Steve Koch", Randy Balice", Samuel Loftin" a Ecology Group, Los Alumos National Laboratory, Los Alumos, NM, 87545, USA Received 26 January 2001; received in revised form 25 March 2001; accepted 25 April 2001 AbstracU Two methods were used to estimate wildfire-induced surface soil erosion hazards for the Clerro Grande Fire that occurred in 2000 in northern New Mexico. The first was the method commonly used by the Interagency Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation (BAER) Team, and was the method used by the BAER Team on the Cerro Grande Fire.
    [Show full text]
  • A Test of Adversity and Strength: Wildland Fire in the National Park System
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wildland Fire Program A Test of Adversity and Strength Wildland Fire in the National Park System By Hal K. Rothman NPS/J HENRY A Test of Adversity and Strength: Wildland Fire in the National Park System By Hal K. Rothman, Principal Investigator National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Order #CA 8034-2-9003 Special Consultant: Stephen J. Pyne Research Associates: Lincoln Bramwell, Brenna Lissoway, and Lesley Argo Project Managers David Sproul, Michael Childers, and Daniel Holder i Fire is the test of gold; adversity, of strong men. Seneca, Epistles ii Executive Summary The National Park Service’s mission, unique among federal agencies, has made its history of fire policy diverge from that of its peers. Federal fire protection began in the national parks in 1886, when the U.S. Army assumed administration of Yellowstone National Park. After the trauma of the 1910 fire season and creation of a civilian National Park Service in 1916, the new Service embraced the U.S. Forest Service’s policy of aggressive fire suppression. For almost fifty years, suppression was policy, a reality that only began to change in the 1950s. The Leopold Report, published in 1963, further articulated differences in the National Park Service’s mission with its call for parks to be managed as “vignettes of primitive America.” Following passage of the Wilderness Act in 1964, federal agencies – including the NPS – were compelled to reassess their management plans in the context of the new law. Steadily, each federal agency found its mission redefined and its goals recast; this translated into a more diverse spectrum of fire practices, at once splintering the former unity of purpose that surrounded suppression while demanding new ideas and devices to reintegrate those fragmented parts.
    [Show full text]