DOCSLIB.ORG

The Three Cassatts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Three Cassatts Excerpted from Vol. 49 No. 3 of the Tredyffrin Easttown History Quarterly The Three Cassatts Cheryl Leibold ewcomers to Tredyffrin Township often assume The Pennsylvania Academy was the most prestigious Nthat Cassatt Road is named for the famous ex- art school in America, and Mary studied there for two patriate American painter, Mary Cassatt. In fact, the years. At the Academy, a student could experience road’s namesake is her brother Alexander Cassatt, who, in the second half of the nineteenth century was far more famous than his sister. Mary Cassatt’s fami- ly connection to the Main Line - through her older brother Alexander and her younger brother Gardner - provides a reason to examine her career, and to look at the properties owned by her brothers in this area. MARY CASSATT (1844-1926) Mary Cassatt was the daughter of an affluent Pitts- burgh businessman of French ancestry, Robert Cas- satt, and Katherine Kelso Johnston. Mary was the fourth child to live to adulthood, preceded by Lydia, Alexander, Robert (who died at age thirteen), and followed by Gardner. Mary’s father owned several brokerage houses and had many real estate dealings. He was relatively wealthy, and essentially retired in 1848 at age forty. Robert Cassatt was incredibly per- ipatetic, moving his family to over a dozen residences in central and eastern Pennsylvania between 1844 and 1871. Two pivotal events formed Mary’s early life. The first was the family’s extended sojourn in Europe from mid-1851 to late 1855. They spent two years in Paris and a year and a half in Germany, where her parents sought medical help for young Robbie. All the children learned French and German, as well as studying literature and other academic subjects, and they probably also took drawing lessons. Robbie died in Germany of a bone disease at age thirteen, and the grieving family returned to the United States in 1855. Photograph of Mary Cassatt, 1872. While visiting Parma, Italy, Mary Cassatt inscribed this photograph of herself to her friend The second major event in Mary's maturation oc- Emily Sartain: “Alla distinta pittrice, Emila Sartain.” (To the curred in April of 1860, when at age sixteen she en- distinguished painter, Emily Sartain.”) Courtesy of the Penn- rolled in the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. sylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. 60 Copyright © 2020 Tredyffrin Easttown Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Authors retain copyright for their contributions. This publication or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher. Contact the Society for permission to use any content in this publication.The Society does not accept responsibility for the accuracy of the information herein. Excerpted from Vol. 49 No. 3 of the Tredyffrin Easttown History Quarterly exhibitions of both European and American paint- In early 1867, Mary and Eliza left the formal and so- ings, as well have access to the growing permanent phisticated art world of Paris for the French country- collection. Her training consisted of copying, using side. For about a year and a half, they lived in differ- both plaster casts of ancient sculptures and old master ent small towns. Only one of these stops lasted as paintings. In addition, there was instruction in draw- long as a year, a situation that foretold Mary's life- ing, with some access to live models, and lectures on long predilection for incessant travel. They enjoyed human anatomy. rural French life enormously, and later Mary would return to the French countryside for lengthy periods. During the Civil War, the family lived in Cheney, They studied informally with several older artists Pennsylvania, where they seem to have been little who had abandoned Paris for the country, and they affected by the conflict, and may have stayed neutral. painted the picturesque local people and places. This Mary was a good horsewoman, and spent time riding phase of her career, from her first efforts in 1867 to with her brother Alexander. She probably made the mid-1870s, was still formative, and although she many trips into Philadelphia, but little is known about eagerly sought to sell some paintings, she saw little these years. In late 1865, Mary, now twenty-one success. She eventually abandoned these subjects years of age and eager to begin studying art in Eu- and turned to portraiture. rope, left for Paris with her close friend and fellow Academy student, Eliza Haldeman. Mary’s mother The outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War in 1870 eventually joined them, and by 1877 both Mary’s forced Mary to abandon Europe, spending a year in parents as well as her sister Lydia had settled perma- the U. S. But by late 1871 she was back in France, nently in Paris. The Cassatt family lived very com- where she resided until her death in 1926. She be- fortably there, supported by Robert Cassatt’s wealth came a tireless and constant traveler, visiting dozens and a trust fund provided for them by the oldest son, of European cities, occasionally alone, but more often Alexander. Mary returned to the United States for in the company of friends. One of the few surviving only four visits, in 1870, 1874, 1898, and 1908. photographs of her was taken in Parma, Italy. She visited that city in 1872 with her friend Emily Sar- Since women were not admitted to the state spon- tain, whose father was one of the premier artists and sored art school, the École des Beaux-Arts, Cassatt engravers in Philadelphia. They had met through the had to find other opportunities. Mary and Eliza spent art circles of Philadelphia, although a later argument long days copying masterworks in the Louvre, stand- ended their friendship. Mary was always one to hold ard practice for art students at the time. She and Eli- a grudge, and she never reconciled with Emily.3 za also attended more structured classes at a private art school for women, working from models every From the late 1870s, Mary’s portraits can be seen as day. Mary was accepted as a private pupil of the the start of her mature career, and in general the sub- prestigious teacher Jean-Léon Gérôme, a coup that ject for which she is famous. Her sitters are almost thrilled and amazed her friends in both the U. S. and always women, usually looking serious and quiet, France. She told her biographer in 1912 that her fa- with only a suggestion of detail. Portraiture reflected ther’s reaction to the idea of her attending art school Cassatt’s interest in the pictorial qualities of everyday 1 in Europe was: “I’d almost rather see you dead.” life, rather than subjects drawn from history, myth, or But she prevailed, and the family grew to understand the Bible. Her primary subjects were her family and that Mary would not be deterred in her goal of be- friends, posed in domestic settings or engaged in pur- coming a professional artist. suits available to women in Paris, such as theatre and opera, taking tea, shopping, or visiting museums. Later in her life, Mary recalled that as early as her The bustle of urban life in Paris and its streets never days at the Pennsylvania Academy she never felt in- interested her, and she painted no landscapes or still ferior to male students. She was outspoken and often life compositions. opinionated and stubborn. She was also plain, had few if any suitors, and admitted to being uncomforta- While Mary Cassatt’s early works were done in the ble in social situations. Her decision not to marry dark and somber tones of the academic tradition, her may have begun forming even in her late teens, al- works after about 1877 reflect a brighter color pal- though it was not an uncommon decision for young ette, loose brushwork, and an immediacy of observa- women at that time.2 61 Copyright © 2020 Tredyffrin Easttown Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Authors retain copyright for their contributions. This publication or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher. Contact the Society for permission to use any content in this publication.The Society does not accept responsibility for the accuracy of the information herein. Excerpted from Vol. 49 No. 3 of the Tredyffrin Easttown History Quarterly tion. This change of style was the result of her dis- clearly visible separate strokes of color. Instead of covery of the new style of impressionism, a move- trying to capture a timeless moment, she and the oth- ment in French art pioneered by Claude Monet, Jean er impressionists were more concerned with a casual Renoir and Edgar Degas. The Impressionists were a observation. Her father commented in a letter to her group of artists who had become disillusioned with brother: “She is now known to the Art world as well the French art system. They decided to stage their as to the general public in such a way as not to be own shows, advertise them, and hope for sales and forgotten…Every one of the French papers men- critical praise. The group mounted eight exhibitions tioned the exhibition and nearly all named [Mary] in rented rooms between 1874 and 1886. In 1877, most of them in terms of praise….” 5 She was the just after the third Impressionist exhibition, Mary only American ever to show with them, exhibiting in was invited by Edgar Degas to exhibit with the Im- four of their eight group shows. pressionists. She “accepted with joy,” as she told her biographer, and “began to live.” 4 The late 1880s saw the beginning of the long series of mother and child images that would grow into her In 1879, she exhibited with the group for the first greatest body of work, and her signature theme for time, making what she felt was her real debut at age the next twenty years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oral History Interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14
    Oral history interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Frederick Sweet on February 13 & 14, 1976. The interview took place in Sargentville, Maine, and was conducted by Robert Brown for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview February 13, 1976. ROBERT BROWN: Could you begin, perhaps, by just sketching out a bit of your childhood, and we can pick up from there. FREDERICK SWEET: I spent most of my early childhood in this house. My father, a doctor and tenth generation Rhode Islander, went out to Bisbee, Arizona, a wild-west copper-mining town, as the chief surgeon under the aegis of the Company. My mother always came East at pregnancy and was in New York visiting relatives when my father died very suddenly of cerebral hemorrhage. My mother was seven months pregnant with me. Since I was to be a summer baby, she ended up by coming to this house and being a cook and being a cook and a nurse with her there. The local doctor came and said nothing was going to happen for quite a long time and went off in his horse and buggy. I was promptly delivered by the cook and a nurse.
    [Show full text]
  • James G. Lydon Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    168 BOOK REVIEWS APRIL and was a major trader in opium smuggled in from the Near East and India. Though some historians have suggested that drug smuggling re- flected racist attitudes, the author concludes rather that it fitted the moral standards of the day. Defense of opium smuggling was defense of free-trade principles. Despite the corruption of government officials which itoccasioned, the Chinese did not have the same antipathy for American traders as they directed toward the British who fought two wars to continue the trade. What Britain attained by war, America gained by diplomacy, without creating hatreds. While they treated Chinese law casually, Americans greatly respected Chinese merchants for their honesty and high ethical standards. Though the outlines of American contacts withAsia have been thoroughly sketched by others, Goldstein makes an important contribution inrelating the social issues connected with the trade to questions of cultural exchange and racist relationships. Some minor carping: the author might have concentrated a bit more attention on the importance of Chinese styles to eighteenth- century Europeans, the era of "Chinoiserie." That Asian culture was in the mode undoubtedly encouraged American interest in the China trade. The archaic spelling used for St. Eustatius (St. Eustacia) was bothersome. Is it George Chinery (illustration opposite p. 36) or George Chinnery (p. 38) ? References to American war vessels as USF Congress and USF Vincennes are confusing. Does the "F" sig- nify frigate ? Ifso, it is a new usage since frigates were ship-rigged ; thus USS serves. Allin all,however, this small study is very well done ;it is well written, very well researched, very nicely and profusely illustrated, very neatly packaged and published.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline Peart, American Artist
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School School of Humanities MOMENTS OF LIGHT AND YEARS OF AGONY: CAROLINE PEART, AMERICAN ARTIST 1870-1963 A Dissertation in American Studies by Katharine John Snider ©2018 Katharine John Snider Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2018 The dissertation of Katharine John Snider was reviewed and approved* by the following: Anne A. Verplanck Associate Professor of American Studies and Heritage Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Charles Kupfer Associate Professor of American Studies and History John R. Haddad Professor of American Studies and Popular Culture Program Chair Holly Angelique Professor of Community Psychology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the life of American artist Caroline Peart (1870-1963) within the context of female artists at the turn of the twentieth century. Many of these artists’ stories remain untold as so few women achieved notoriety in the field and female artists are a relatively new area of robust academic interest. Caroline began her formal training at The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts at a pivotal moment in the American art scene. Women were entering art academies at record numbers, and Caroline was among a cadre of women who finally had access to formal education. Her family had the wealth to support her artistic interest and to secure Caroline’s position with other elite Philadelphia-area families. In addition to her training at the Academy, Caroline frequently traveled to Europe to paint and she studied at the Academie Carmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. Jessica Cresseveur University of Louisville
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 The queer child and haut bourgeois domesticity : Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. Jessica Cresseveur University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the American Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Cresseveur, Jessica, "The queer child and haut bourgeois domesticity : Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt." (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2409. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2409 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE QUEER CHILD AND HAUT BOURGEOIS DOMESTICITY: BERTHE MORISOT AND MARY CASSATT By Jessica Cresseveur B.A., University of Louisville, 2000 M.A., University College London, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Humanities Department of Comparative Humanities University
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews and Book Notes
    BOOK REVIEWS AND BOOK NOTES Edited by LEONIDAS DODSON University of Pennsylvania Notable Women Of Pennsylvania. Edited by Gertrude B. Biddle and Sarah D. Lowrie. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1942, pp. 307. $3.00.) Many of the two hundred brief biographies here presented were as- sembled in 1926 by Mrs. J. Willis Martin and her sesquicentennial com- mittee. Printed in the Public Ledger, they were mounted at the direction of its editor, the late Cyrus H. K. Curtis, in a Book of Honor. Other biographies have been added, and from the sum those which form the collection were carefully selected. The first two sketches present Madame Printz, wife of Governor Printz, and her capable daughter, Armot Papegoya, and the last four, Maud Conyers Exley, physician; Christine Wetherill Stevenson, actress, playwright, and founder of the Philadelphia Art Alliance; Marion Reilly, dean of Bryn Mawr College; and Caroline Tyler Lea, organizer and supporter of projects for human welfare. Between the two periods represented is recorded the expanding sphere of women's activities. Here are pioneer housewives who became perforce the defenders of their families. Here are Mary Jemison and Frances Slocum, exhibiting strength of character in long captivity. Here are Madame Ferree, Esther Say Harris, Maria Theresa Homet, Susanna Wright, Anna Eve Weiser. Here are patriots and soldiers-Lydia Darragh, Margaret Corbin, Molly Pitcher. Here are mothers of famous children- Anne West Gibson, Frances Rose Benit. Here are early diarists- Elizabeth Drinker, Sarah Eve, Sally Wister. Here are philanthropists- Rebecca Gratz, Helen Fleisher. Here are engravers and painters-Anna C. and Sarah Peale, Emily Sartain, Anna Lea Merritt, Mary Cassatt, Florence Este, Alice Barber Stephens, Jessie Wilcox Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Forrest House; Gaul-Forrest House
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL OF DESIGN FOR WOMEN Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL OF DESIGN FOR WOMEN Other Name/Site Number: Moore College of Art; Forrest House; Gaul-Forrest House 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 1346 North Broad Street Not for publication: City/Town: Philadelphia Vicinity: State: PA County: Philadelphia Code: 101 Zip Code: 19121 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private; X Building(s): X Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal:__ Structure:__ Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 ____ buildings ____ ____ sites ___ ___ structures ____ ____ objects 1 _0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL OF DESIGN FOR WOMEN Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACT: Cara Schneider (215) 206-2034, [email protected] A
    CONTACT: Cara Schneider (215) 206-2034, [email protected] A GIANT SUMMER OF FUN & CELEBRATION AWAITS VISITORS TO GREATER PHILADELPHIA Philadelphia Flower Show Blooms Outdoors For The First Time, Faith and Liberty Discovery Center Debuts On Independence Mall & Wawa Welcome America Fourth Of July Celebration Returns PHILADELPHIA, April 22, 2021 – Greater Philadelphia has a big summer planned for visitors eager to safely explore once again. As the warm-weather season nears and COVID-19 restrictions continue to lift, the region is ready to welcome visitors back as it debuts long-awaited new and renovated museums, unveils inspired exhibits, celebrates the return of beloved annual events and opens brand new hotels that have been in the pipeline for years. Those looking to connect and reconnect with loved ones after a long hiatus from travel can tour the brand- new Faith and Liberty Discovery Center, making its debut just steps away from Independence National Historical Park’s Liberty Bell Center and Independence Hall on May 1, 2021; explore the PHS Philadelphia Flower Show outdoors for the first time in its 192-year history; and celebrate the nation’s birthday in its birthplace during the annual Wawa Welcome America Fourth of July festival. When it’s time to take a break after days spent touring the town, visitors can do so at the city’s first W Hotel or at the Guild House Hotel, a boutique property in a National Historic Landmark building, both opening in June. Another great option for spending a night or two is the ever-popular Visit Philly Overnight Hotel Package, which includes hotel parking and buy-one-get-one-free tickets for 19 attractions, many of which are hosting special exhibits this summer (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt Peale's "Notes Oj the Painting Room"
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS Useful Knowledge in Minute Particulars: Rembrandt Peale's "Notes oj the Painting Room" In 1976 Peter Marzio published The Art Crusade^ An Analysis of American Drawing Manuals, 1820-1860 in which he described a phe- nomenon represented by the approximately 145 drawing manuals to appear in the United States between 1820 and 1860. Marzio argued that these manuals represented a veritable crusade based upon the premise that "anyone who can learn to write can learn to draw." He identified Rembrandt Peale as one of the three most important leaders in the movement, along with John Rubens Smith and John Gadsby Chapman. Peale, he notes in the abstract that precedes his full text, was a: fine painter and draughtsman, classical in approach and somewhat out of step with the advanced aesthetic movements of the pre-Civil War years. [His] efforts formed a loose but intelligible approach to art promotion. But by 1860 the crusade disintegrated: new drawing theories popularized by the English writer, John Ruskin, placed shading and mass above line in the definition of form; specialization in art, in science, in education, and in mechanical drawing warred against the general approach of the art crusade. * Elsewhere in this issue of the Pennsylvania Magazine oj History and Biography, Paul Staiti describes Peak's participation in that crusade; his Graphics enjoyed the largest circulation of any American drawing book before the Civil War. Marzio suggests that the Graphics was informed by a belief inherited from Peale's father, Charles Willson Peale, that "high art was the product of practice and understanding, not innate talent." Rembrandt apparently insisted that "drawing and 1 Peter C.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Art Students in America: an Historical Study of Academic Art Instruction During the Nineteenth Century
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfrhn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aiQf type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandardm a r gins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wiD indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms international A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Impressionism and Post-Impressionism: Highlights from the Philadelphia Museum of Art'
    H-Pennsylvania Locke on Thompson and Rishel and Owens and Rub, 'Impressionism and Post-Impressionism: Highlights from the Philadelphia Museum of Art' Review published on Monday, January 4, 2021 Jennifer A. Thompson, Joseph J. Rishel, Eileen Owens, Timothy Rub, eds. Impressionism and Post-Impressionism: Highlights from the Philadelphia Museum of Art. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019. 216 pp. $35.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-87633-289-4. Reviewed by Nancy Locke (Pennsylvania State University) Published on H-Pennsylvania (January, 2021) Commissioned by Jeanine Mazak-Kahne (Indiana University of Pennsylvania) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=55313 The collection of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist art at the Philadelphia Museum of Art stands as one of the richest in the nation. It is not surprising that the institution would want to document it in book form. The questions that arise, however, concern the form that such a book should take. Curators necessarily considered how much of the vast collection should be included, and how many works should be illustrated. If these movements are primarily French, how many non-French artists should appear? What should the balance be between painting and other art forms? And is the audience for the book primarily members of the museum-going public, scholars specializing in the artists featured, or perhaps readers discovering the art for the first time? There may be no correct answers to these questions, and I would like to stress that as I sketch the way I think Jennifer A. Thompson and her collaborators chose to structureImpressionism and Post-Impressionism: Highlights from the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plastic Club Records
    Collection 3106 The Plastic Club Records 1888-2007 52 boxes, 47 volumes, 11 flat files, 21.4 linear feet Contact: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: (215) 732-6200 FAX: (215) 732-2680 http://www.hsp.org Processed by: Heather Willever-Farr Processing Completed: April 2009 Sponsor: Processing made possible by a generous donation from Dorothy Del Bueno Restrictions: None Related Collections at See page 10 HSP: © 2009 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved. Plastic Club records Collection 3106 Plastic Club records Creator: Plastic Club 1888-2007 52 boxes, 47 volumes, 11 flat files, 21.4 linear feet Collection 3106 Abstract The Plastic Club, one of the oldest art organizations for women in the United States, was founded in Philadelphia in 1897. Emily Sartain of the Philadelphia School of Design (later the Moore College of Art) and other female artists created the club to promote women’s artwork and encourage artistic collaboration. The club held exhibitions, offered art classes, and hosted social events such as its annual masquerade party, “the Rabbit.” Many prominent and nationally recognized artists were members of the club, including Elenore Plaisted Abbott, Paula Himmelsbach Balano, Cecilia Beaux, Fern Isabel Coppedge, Blanche Dillaye, Elizabeth Shippen Green, Charlotte Harding, Francis Tipton Hunter, Violet Oakley, Emily and Harriet Sartain, Jessie Willcox Smith, Alice Barber Stephens, and Elizabeth Fisher Washington. The Plastic Club records span from 1888 to 2007 and include administrative records, correspondence, member records, annual reports, and exhibition catalogs. In addition, the collection contains scrapbooks, newspaper clippings, photographs, original artwork, and catalogs from Philadelphia and New York art galleries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alms for Oblivion: the History of Women in Early American Graphic Design Author(S): Ellen Mazur Thomson Source: Design Issues, Vol
    Almsfor Oblivion: TheHistory of Womenin EarlyAmerican Graphic Design EllenMazur Thomson Timehath, my Lord,a walletat his back,Wherein he puts almsforoblivion, A great-siz'dmonster of ingratitudes... William Shakespeare, Troilusand Cressida When Linda Nochlin's article "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" appeared in 1971, it generated enormous interest in neglected work by women artists.' Nochlin challenged traditional art historians to analyze the institutional and ideological structures that distort what women have accomplished or were unable to achieve. She warned that women must "face up to the reality of 1 LindaNochlin, "Why Have There Been their history and of their present situation, without making excuses NoGreat Women Artists?" Art News, 69, or puffing mediocrity. Disadvantage may indeed be an excuse; it is 9 (January1971), 22-39, 67-71. This not, however, an intellectual position."2 Since then, feminist histori- articlealso appeared as "WhyAre There on in NoGreat Women Artists?" Women in ans have explored the limitations placed women pursuing SexistSociety. Studies in Power and their artistic careers, as well as the representations of those women Powerless,ed. Vivian Gornick and who did succeed.3 Graphic design historians, however, have only BarbaraMoran. (New York: Basic Books, recently faced the biases in their own field and begun to identify 1971)and Art and Sexual Politics, ed. individual women and document their position in graphic design ThomasB. Hess and Elizabeth C. Baker. history. (NewYork: Colliers, 1971). 2 Nochlin,Art News, 70. Martha Scotford Lange began this process by showing that 3 Feministart historians have expanded the major texts used to teach graphic design concentrate on the Nochlin'sagenda considerably.
    [Show full text]