The Bushehr Hinterland Results of the First Season of the Iranian-British Archaeological Survey of Bushehr Province, November–December 2004
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE BUSHEHR HINTERLAND RESULTS OF THE FIRST SEASON OF THE IRANIAN-BRITISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF BUSHEHR PROVINCE, NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2004 By R.A. Carter, K. Challis, S.M.N. Priestman and H. Tofighian Oxford, Durham, Birmingham and ICAR INTRODUCTION History of Previous Investigations A joint Iranian-British archaeological and geomorpho- Previous work indicated a rich history of occupation on logical survey of Bushehr Province, Iran (Fig. 1) took the Bushehr Peninsula itself. More limited exploration place between 23rd November and 18th December 2004, of the adjacent mainland had also revealed significant as a pilot season to determine the course of future survey occupation, especially during the Elamite and Parthian- and excavation.1 There were three main research aims: Sasanian Periods. Investigations began early in the 19th • To clarify the nature and chronology of coastal century, when the British Residency attracted numerous settlement in the Persian Gulf, and build a chronolog- individuals with an antiquarian interest (Simpson ical and cultural framework for the Bushehr coastal forthcoming). At least eight sites were noted, producing region. large numbers of Sasanian jar burials, often placed in the • To seek evidence for contact between coastal Iran, ground in linear alignments (ibid). In 1913, a French Mesopotamia and the littoral of the Arabian Peninsula delegation began excavating at Tul-e Peytul (ancient during the 6th/5th millennia B.C.E. (known as the Liyan) (Pézard 1914), to investigate cuneiform Chalcolithic, Ubaid and Neolithic Periods in each inscribed bricks found on the surface during the third respective region). quarter of the 19th century, and excavated by Andreas in • To gather data towards establishing the sequence of 1887 (Simpson forthcoming). Pézard described the sea-level change in the Persian Gulf. painted pottery of the mound as “Chalcolithic”, though in fact it belongs to the Kaftari horizon of the late The region was chosen because of its high archaeologi- 3rd/early 2nd millennium B.C.E. (Potts 2003: 159; cal potential, established through previous fieldwork (see Petrie et al. 2005: 67–68; Carter 2003: 34–35). In 1933 below), and specifically because of reports of a Aurel Stein visited Bushehr (Stein 1937: 234–43). He Chalcolithic Ubaid-related site on the Bushehr Peninsula was intrigued by the lack of Chalcolithic sites between (Oates 1983: 255–56). The latter is relevant to previous Minab and Bushehr, and speculated that this was due not and ongoing research on 5th/6th millennium maritime to an absence of occupation but changes in relative sea exchange and coastal occupation, undertaken in Kuwait, level (Stein 1937: 236–37). Unfortunately he was Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab thwarted in his attempts to explore inland Fars and the Emirates (Masry 1974; Oates et al. 1977; Oates 1978; mainland opposite the peninsula. Inizan 1988; Uerpmann and Uerpmann 1996; Jasim Between 1969 and 1971, Andrew Williamson and 1996; Beech et al. 2000; Carter 2002). Martha Prickett surveyed the Peninsula, recording at Because of considerations of access, and because the least 89 individual archaeological sites and picking up Bushehr Peninsula had already been comparatively well abundant pottery (Priestman forthcoming). Williamson studied, the work took place on the mainland. The identified an intensive Sasanian presence, and resulting short survey of the Bushehr hinterland concluded that the impressive remains at Rishahr, 6 km. recorded 56 sites dating from the Chalcolithic through to south of Bushehr town, should be identified with the the Late Islamic Period. The majority were Achaemenid leading Sasanian port, Rev Ardashir (Whitehouse and to Sasanian in date. Areas suitable for more intensive Williamson 1973: 39–41). This was one of the principle survey were identified, and a Chalcolithic site was ports of the Sasanian Empire founded as part of the identified for test excavation in any future season. strategic campaign by Ardashir I to gain mercantile 2 JOURNAL OF PERSIAN STUDIES Fig. 1. The northern Persian Gulf, with mainland Bushehr Province outlined in black. supremacy within the Persian Gulf (Piacentini 1985: Peninsula, which channelled goods from the hinterland 60). Historical texts indicate that it became the main down to the small port of Shif and thence to the peninsula Sasanian trade emporium within the Persian Gulf, as (see below). This route may have had earlier origins. well as the seat of the Nestorian metropolitan of Persis Fieldwork by western archaeologists ceased after (Gropp 1991: 86). Renewed work on Williamson’s 1979, but Iranian archaeologists were busy both before collection is nearing completion (Priestman and Kennet and after the Revolution. The Early Islamic site of 2002; Priestman 2003). Apart from Sasanian and Tawwaj (2004 site code: BH12), north of Borazjan, was Islamic settlements, a Chalcolithic/Ubaid-related site, visited and identified by A. Iqtidari in 1970 (Whitcomb H200, was found at the southern end of the peninsula, at 1987: 333 and n. 31). Professor A. Sarfaraz discovered or near the village of Halileh (Whitehouse and several Achaemenid sites in the region, including a Williamson 1973: 35, n. 32). palace near Borazjan, Char Khab (BH27), which he In 1973 Donald Whitcomb carried out a survey and dated to the later years of Cyrus the Great (Sarfaraz published pottery from two sites on the peninsula and 13 1971–72; Sarfaraz 1973). This was later reinvestigated on the mainland. He dated most of them to the Elamite by the Bushehr Cultural Heritage and Tourism and Partho-Sasanian Periods. Some were reidentified Organisation. Professor Sarfaraz investigated another during the 2004 season. Whitcomb also used aerial Achaemenid Palace at Sang-e Siah (BH48), a site which photography and textual sources to posit the existence of has now been entirely bulldozed. Mr Ismael Yaghma’i a canal system used to supply the Bushehr Peninsula has been conducting survey and excavations since the with water from as early as the Achaemenid Period 1970s at a large group of sites dating to the Achaemenid (Whitcomb 1987: 331). The so-called Angali Canal was to Sasanian periods, outside Deh Qa’ed, a village to the investigated during the 2004 survey and found not to north of Borazjan (BH29–44).2 Together these sites exist. The features observed by Whitcomb relate to a appear to constitute an extensive town, which is road and rail system used to supply the Bushehr discussed further below. IRANIAN-BRITISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF BUSHEHR PROVINCE 3 Fig. 2. Map of the study area, with 5 m. contour lines and sites located on the survey. Fig. 3. Map of study area with survey zones and sites located on the survey. Additionally, the Bushehr Cultural Heritage and Strategic location, geography and geomorphology Tourism organisation has been conducting test excavations at various sites in the region, including at The designated study area extended between the towns Hazar Mardom on the Bushehr Peninsula, at Ziyarat on of Bushehr, Ganaveh, Ahram and Dalaki, measuring c. the south bank of the River Hilleh, and at the fort in 90 km. SE-NW and 60 km. SW-NE at the widest points Ahram. Most recently, Hossein Tofighian carried out (Fig. 2). It consists of a broad plain between the Zagros underwater survey at Bandar-e Rig in 2004, where mountains and the sea, bisected by one major river, the submerged torpedo jars were discovered. These date to Rud-e Hilleh, which flows year-round. This divides between the Parthian and Early Islamic periods. upstream near Sa’adabad into the Rivers Shapur (or 4 JOURNAL OF PERSIAN STUDIES Fig. 4. Distribution of sites of the Early Periods (Chalcolithic to Elamite). Shirin) and Dalaki (Fig. 4). The most significant modern during past episodes of flooding, or when it followed a settlements on the mainland cluster around this system, slightly different course. Several features visible on the particularly near the divide. There are several smaller satellite imagery indicate previous courses for the river, rivers which do not flow year round, the most significant which has meandered across the flat plain. The modern of which are the Shur, just north of the Hilleh, and the course is only maintained by human intervention. Ahram, which flows past the town of Ahram but does not Except in the lowest parts below the 10 m. contour reach the sea. The existence of the perennial river flow is where it is very saline, the alluvial silts are cultivable significant to human occupation and agriculture, given and although barren for much of the year, are farmed the low rainfall of the province. Bushehr Town receives with rain-fed cereals. Although slightly saline, the water only 259 mm. of rainfall annually, and the months of from the Hilleh itself is extracted to feed crops and date June to September are entirely dry (Potts 1999: 14, tab. groves year-round in the areas closer to the river. 2.1). This would allow rain-fed agriculture to take place The effects of the sedimentation regime on the during certain months, but irrigation would be necessary archaeological landscape are significant. The survey for year-round cultivation. showed that, with the exception of a possible The coastal plain exhibits a varied geography, Achaemenid or post-Achaemenid component in an dominated in its lower part by the delta of the River otherwise Sasanian sherd scatter on the Angali Plain,3 Hilleh. Examination of the satellite images (see below) no sites earlier than the Sasanian were found anywhere and ground observations indicate that the current delta, below the 20 m. contour. Earlier sites either did not exist all of the Angali plain and most of the other lower areas below this line, as what is now land would then have of the Bushehr hinterland, consist of alluvial sediments been sea; or they have been buried by alluvium; or they deposited by the Hilleh system, and to a lesser extent the have been washed away as the river shifted course.