The Ethics of Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ethics of Science THE ETHICS OF SCIENCE “If anyone still believes that scientific research is a value-free zone, The Ethics of Science will disabuse them. David B.Resnik uses a wealth of actual and hypothetical examples in a clear philosophical discussion that illuminates the range of ethical concerns that scientists need to face. This is one area where philosophical argument can serve a practical need: the more scientists who think carefully about the issues Resnik raises, the better.” Peter Lipton Professor of History and Philosophy of Science University of Cambridge “Science faculty and students—and an interested public—will find The Ethics of Science admirably clear, balanced, and richly comprehensive. Resnik’s clarity shows itself not only in his unpretentious, straight-forwardness, but by being philosophically sophisticated yet avoiding jargon. An extremely useful aspect of the book is that virtually every kind of ethical question that arises in and about science is addressed.” Hans Oberdiek Swarthmore College David B.Resnik is an Associate Professor of Philosophy and the Director of the Center for the Advancement of Ethics at the University of Wyoming. This is his first book. Philosophical Issues in ScienceEdited by W.H.Newton-Smith Balliol College, Oxford Real HistoryMartin Bunzl Brute ScienceHugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks Living in a Technological CultureMary Tiles and Hans Oberdiek The Rational and the SocialJames Robert Brown The Nature of the DiseaseLawrie Reznek The Philosophical Defence of PsychiatryLawrie Reznek Inference to the Best ExaminationPeter Lipton Time, Space and PhilosophyChristopher Ray Mathematics and the Image of ReasonMary Tiles Evil or Ill?Lawrie Reznek The Ethics of Science: An IntroductionDavid B.Resnik THE ETHICS OF SCIENCE An Introduction David B.Resnik London and New York First published 1998 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1998 David B.Resnik All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Resnik, David B., 1962– The ethics of science: an introduction/David B.Resnik. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Science—Moral and ethical aspects. 2. Research—Philosophy. I. Title. Q175.35.R46 1998 174′.95—dc21 97–40514 ISBN 0-203-97906-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-16697-7 (hbk) ISBN 0-415-16698-5 (pbk) In memory of my grandmother, Muriel Resnik, who encouraged me to write. Contents Acknowledgments ix Chapter 1 Science and Ethics 1 The Baltimore Affair 5 Cloning Research 7 The Debate over Cold Fusion 9 Chapter 2 Ethical Theory and Applications 13 Ethics, Law, Politics, and Religion 13 Moral Theory 16 Moral Choices 21 Relativism 25 Chapter 3 Science as a Profession 31 Science: From Avocation to Profession 31 The Goals of Science 34 The Contemporary Research Environment 37 Communication and Science’s Peer Review System 40 The Scientific Method 44 Chapter 4 Standards of Ethical Conduct in Science 48 Honesty 48 Carefulness 51 Openness 52 Freedom 54 Credit 55 Education 56 vii Social Responsibility 57 Legality 58 Opportunity 59 Mutual Respect 60 Efficiency 60 Respect for Subjects 61 Concluding Remarks 61 Chapter 5 Objectivity in Research 66 Honesty in Research 66 Misconduct in Science 71 Error and Self-deception 72 Bias in Research 75 Conflicts of Interest 76 Openness 52 Data Management 83 Chapter 6 Ethical Issues in Scientific Publication 85 Objectivity in Publication 85 Other Publication Issues 89 Credit Where Credit is Due 91 Intellectual Property 96 Science, the Media, and the Public 101 Chapter 7 Ethical Issues in the Laboratory 108 The Ethics of the Mentor—Mentee Relationship 108 Harassment 109 Reporting Misconduct in Science 110 Teaching vs. Research 111 Ethical Issues in Hiring and Recruitment 112 Sharing and Preserving Resources 115 Research on Human Subjects 117 viii Research on Animal Subjects 123 Chapter 8 The Scientist in Society 130 Social Responsibility 57 Expert Testimony in Court 134 Industrial Science 137 Military Science 143 The Public Funding of Research 148 Other Social, Political, and Moral Issues 151 Postscript: Toward a More Ethical Science 153 Appendix: Case Studies 158 Notes 175 Bibliography 181 Index 193 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the following people for comments on drafts of this book: David Hull, Scott O’Brien, W.H.Newton-Smith, Marshall Thomsen, and several anonymous reviewers. I would also like to thank the following people for comments and criticism: Stephanie Bird, Ron Canterna, Michael Davis, Clark Glymour, Alvin Goldman, Susanna Goodin, Fred Grinnell, Michael Harkin, A.C.Higgins, Dale Jamieson, Audrey Kleinsasser, Helen Longino, Claudia Mills, Kenneth Pimple, Michael Resnik, Geoffrey Sayre McCord, Ed Sherline, Linda Sweeting, Robert Switzer, and my class on ethical issues in scientific research which I taught at the University of Wyoming in the Spring of 1996. I also would like to mention that the National Science Foundation helped to provide partial support for this work through grants SBR-960297, SBR-9511817, SBR-9223819, and AST-9100602. CHAPTER 1 Science and Ethics During the past decade, scientists, laypeople, and politicians have become increasingly aware of the importance of ethics in scientific research. Several trends have contributed to these growing concerns. First, the press has covered stories on ethical issues raised by science, such as the United States (US) government’s secret experiments on human beings during the Cold War, genetic engineering, the Human Genome Project, studies on the genetic basis of intelligence, the cloning of human embryos and animals, and global warming. Second, scientists and government officials have investigated, documented, and adjudicated cases of ethical misconduct and ethically questionable conduct in many aspects of research, and a perceived lack of ethics in science has threatened the stability and integrity of research (PSRCR 1992, Hilts 1996, Hedges 1997). These cases include allegations of plagiarism, fraud, violations of the law, mismanagement of funds, exploitation of subordinates, violations of recombinant DNA regulations, discrimination, conflicts of interests, and problems with the FBI’s crime lab. Despite a growing body of evidence on unethical research, the data still indicate that the frequency of misconduct in science is quite low when compared to the frequency of misconduct in other professions, such as business, medicine, or law (PSRCR 1992).1 A third reason why ethics has become a pressing concern is that science’s increasing interdependence with business and industry has generated ethical conflicts between scientific values and business values (PSRCR 1992, Reiser 1993). These conflicts have raised concerns about the funding of science, peer review, scientific openness, the ownership of knowledge, and the sharing of resources. Universities have expressed concerns about scientists who use their facilities to conduct secret research for private industry or personal economic gain (Bowie 1994). In some cases, universities have fought lengthy court battles with businesses and individuals over patents and intellectual property rights. University administrators also complain that scientists who work for business are spending less time on their other duties, such as education. Scientists in various fields worry that the relationship between science and business will redirect research toward the solution of applied problems and that basic research will suffer. Government watchdogs have objected to allowing companies to profit from publicly funded research (Lomasky 1987). 2 THE ETHICS OF SCIENCE In response to concerns about ethical improprieties and issues in science, various scientific institutions and societies, such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), and Sigma Xi have commissioned committees to study ethical issues and improprieties in science and make policy recommendations (Sigma Xi 1986, 1993, AAAS 1991, PSRCR 1992, Committee on the Conduct of Science 1994). Additionally, universities, businesses, and scientific societies have sponsored workshops and conferences that address ethical issues in science, scientists have initiated efforts to integrate ethics into the science curriculum at the graduate and undergraduate level of instruction, scholars from various sciences and the humanities have written books and articles about the ethics in research, and new journals have been started that address ethical issues in science (Reiser 1993, Bird and Spier 1995, Garte 1995). Finally, scientific societies and organizations have adopted codes of ethics and have recommended that scientists integrate ethics into the science curriculum (Sigma Xi 1986, US Congress 1990, PSCRC 1992). Despite
Recommended publications
  • Paley's New Clothes. a Review of God, the Devil
    Evolutionary Psychology human-nature.com/ep – 2004. 2: 195-199 ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Book Review Paley’s New Clothes A review of God, the Devil, and Darwin by Niall Shanks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Sean J. Cunningham, Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wa. 98195, USA. Email: [email protected]. A new creationist offshoot, euphemistically dubbed “Intelligent Design” (ID) by its progenitors, has emerged on the political scene in recent years. Unlike its tactless counterparts (e.g., “Young Earth Creationism”), whose blatant religiosity has spelled almost certain demise, this insidious branch remains publicly agnostic about the nature of the “Intelligent Designer,” and is successfully framing ID as a bona fide scientific alternative to Darwinism. Although it constitutes little more than a souped- up version of theologian William Paley’s classic “argument from design,” the woeful state of America’s scientific literacy has us falling for the ruse. Indeed, the Intelligent Design movement has recently infiltrated several state legislatures, and even tallied its first substantial victory in Ohio (American Institute of Biological Sciences, 2004), where ID devotees were highly influential in convincing the state to require “critical analysis of evolution” as a part of its new public school science curriculum. Although this stops short of a legal mandate to teach ID, it smacks of smuggling it in through the back door. This suspicion was confirmed in March of this year when Ohio approved a 10th grade biological science lesson plan, referencing seminal ID texts and directing students to ID websites (Ohio Citizens for Science, 2004). Even worse, legislation that specifically mandates “equal-time” for ID in public schools was proposed (but died) in Missouri, and is still currently pending in Michigan (American Institute of Biological Sciences, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT T. PENNOCK, PH.D. Michigan State University Curriculum Vitae (August 13, 2019)
    ROBERT T. PENNOCK, PH.D. Michigan State University Curriculum Vitae (August 13, 2019) OFFICE: HOME: 919 E. Shaw Lane, Rm. E35 227 Clarendon Rd. East Lansing, MI 48825-1107 East Lansing MI 48823 (517) 432-7701 (517) 324-9994 E-mail: [email protected] WEB: <www.msu.edu/~pennock5> CURRENT APPOINTMENTS: • Michigan State University. University Distinguished Professor. (2019 – present). - History, Philosophy & Sociology of Science. Lyman Briggs College. - Philosophy. Department of Philosophy. - Computer Science, Department of Computer Science & Engineering - Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (EEBB) Graduate Program. - Associate Faculty, Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences. PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS: • Michigan State University. Professor. (2005 – 2019) • University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. Visiting Scholar (2014 – 2018) • American Association for the Advancement of Science. Visiting Scholar (2015) • Duke University, National Evolutionary Synthesis Center. Sabbatical Fellow (2008) • Michigan State University. Associate Professor (2000 – 2005) • The College of New Jersey. Assistant Professor of Philosophy. (1999 – 2000) • The University of Texas at Austin, Assistant Professor of Philosophy. (1991 – 1999) • Pennsylvania Governor’s School for the Sciences (P.G.S.S.), Faculty member. Carnegie-Mellon University (Summers, 1987-1991) EDUCATION: • B.A. w/ Honors, Biology/Philosophy, Earlham College, 1980. • Ph.D., History & Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh, 1991. “Causally Licensed Inference and the Confirmation Relation.” Advisor: Wesley Salmon Committee: John Earman, Clark Glymour, Kenneth Schaffner, Herbert Simon Robert T. Pennock, Curriculum Vitae Page 2 ACADEMIC AWARDS / HONORS: • International Society for Artificial Life Education & Outreach Award as lead for Avida-ED. 2017. • MSU Phi Kappa Phi Excellence Award in Interdisciplinary Scholarship. For Avida-ED Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Experimentation: the Legacy of Claude Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, VOL. 8, NO. 3, 1994 195 Animal Experimentation: the legacy of Claude Bernard Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks Abstract Claude Bernard, the father of scientific physiology, believed that if medicine was to become truly scientific, it would have to be based on rigorous and controlled animal experiments. Bernard instituted a paradigm which has shaped physiological practice for most of the twentieth century. In this paper we examine how Bernard's commitment to hypothetico-deductivism and determinism led to (a) his rejection of the theory of evolution; (b) his minimalization of the role of clinical medicine and epidemiological studies; and (c) his conclusion that experiments on non- human animals were, "entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man". We examine some negative consequences of Bernardianism for twentieth century medicine, and argue that physiology's continued adherence to Bernardianism has caused it to diverge from the other biological sciences which have become increasingly infused with evolutionary theory. But when we reach the limits of vivisection we have other means of going deeper and dealing with the elementary parts of organisms where the elementary properties of vital phenomena have their seat. We may introduce poisons into the circulation, which carry their specific action to one or another histological unit . Poisons are veritable reagents of life, extremely delicate instruments which dissect vital units. (Claude Bernard, 1949)1 Introduction In 1988 the American Medical Association (AMA) issued a White Paper defending biomedical experimentation on animals.2 Although they trace the history of animal experimentation to the ancient world, it was the nineteenth century physiologist Claude Bernard who set out the principles of experimental medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 18, No 3, July
    THE LINNEAN 2002 VOLUME 18 I Editorial In our last issue we introduced the contentious subject of creationism by publishing a lecture given by the late Colin Patterson which was primarily about cladistics as a method for classification, but was, unfortunately, taken by anti-evolutionists to support their cause. In response, a good deal of correspondence has been received by The Linnean, some of which is reproduced in this issue, along with articles by Randy Moore and John Cloudsley-Thompson which defend the evolutionary view. More will be included in subsequent issues, as will the lecture given by Professor Dawkins when last year he unveiled a plaque commemorating the Darwin-Wallace lecture of 1858. In this issue we note how, throughout the United States, anti-evolutionists presently undermine the teaching of science by villifying evolution and demanding time in the schools to teach “creation science” and “intelligent design”. Much of the impetus for the movement against evolution was intitiated in 1925 when a Tennessee Democratic congressman and lay preacher named John Butler proposed a law which stated: “It shall be unlawful for any teacher in any of the universities, normals, and in all other public schools of the State, which are supported in whole or in any part by the public school funds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of Man as taught in the Bible, and to teach that man has descended from a lower order of animals.” The bill passed in the House, seventy-one to five and in the Senate, twenty-four to six, and the Governor, a Southern Baptist, signed it into law on the 2 1st March 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of Intelligent Design: Materialism Versus Creationism from Antiquity to the Present
    Critique of intelligent design: materialism versus creationism from antiquity to the present MORE OPTIONS Books Critique of Intelligent Design: Materialism versus Creationism from Antiquity to the Present by John Bellamy Foster, Brett Clark, Richard York Critique of Intelligent Design is a direct reply to the criticisms of intelligent design proponents and a compelling account of the long debate between materialism and religion in the West. It provides an overview of the contemporary fight concerning nature, science, history, morality, and knowledge. Separate chapters are devoted to the design debate in antiquity, the Enlightenment and natural theology, Marx, Darwin, and Freud, and to current scientific debates over evolution and design. It offers empowering tools to understand and defend critical and scientific reasoning in both the natural and social sciences and society as a whole. Search CSI: Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design Custom Search by Barbara Carroll Forrest, Paul R. Gross In Creationism’s Trojan Horse, Forrest and Gross examine in full I.D. Watch detail the claims and operations of the "Intelligent Design" movement, the most recent manifestation of American creationism. Explaining and analyzing what "design theorists" call ARTICLES their "Wedge Strategy," they document the Wedge’s aggressive political and public relations campaign. BOOKS LINKS Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism NEWS Edited by Matt Young and Taner Edis Why Intelligent Design Fails assembles a team of physicists, biologists, computer scientists, mathematicians, and Tweets by @SkeptInquiry archaeologists to examine intelligent design from a scientific News & Announcements perspective. They consistently find grandiose claims without merit.
    [Show full text]
  • Dembski, Darwin and Devils
    DEMBSKI, DARWIN AND DEVILS JASON ROSENHOUSE Reviews of The Design Revolution by William Dembski, InterVar- sity Press, Downer’s Grove, Illinois., 2004, 334 Pages; God, the Devil and Darwin, by Niall Shanks, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2004, 273 Pages; and Darwinism, Design, and Public Education by John A. Campbell and Stephen Meyer, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI, 2003, 634 Pages. 1. The Design Revolution Since William Dembski’s latest book is subtitled “Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design”, the naive reader might think that he has taken seriously the numerous criticisms leveled at his ideas. More experienced readers will be unsurprised to learn that Dem- bski mostly just repeats the same fallacious arguments he has always made. None of the major criticisms of his work is adequately addressed. After briefly summarizing his ideas for detecting design in natural phe- nomena, I will discuss two of the most fundamental difficulties with his work. Dembski’s primary contributions to evolution-denial are his ponder- ous, repetitive musings about complex, specified information (CSI). It is his assertion that if you find CSI in some physical structure, you can be sure that lurking somewhere in its causal history is an intelligent designer. He further asserts that animals are replete with instances of CSI, implying they did not emerge from natural processes alone. Dembski’s term “information” refers to some event or phenomenon. “Complex” then indicates the probability of the event occurring by nat- ural causes alone is small, while “specified” means the event embodies some pattern describable without reference to the structure itself.
    [Show full text]