REVIEW Hepatitis C Virus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Polyomavirus Major Capsid Protein VP1 Interacts with the Nuclear Matrix Regulatory Protein
FEBS 23316 FEBS Letters 467 (2000) 359^364 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE The polyomavirus major capsid protein VP1 interacts with theprovided nuclearby Elsevier - Publisher Connector matrix regulatory protein YY1 Zdena Palkova¨a;b, Hana Sípanielova¨b, Vanesa Gottifredia;1, Dana Hollanderova¨b, Jitka Forstova¨b, Paolo Amatia;* aInstituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Sezione di Genetica Molecolare, Universita© di Roma La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy bDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Charles University, Vinie©na¨ 5, 12844 Prague 2, Czech Republic Received 17 December 1999 Edited by Hans-Dieter Klenk The external loops are likely to be the structures involved in Abstract Polyomavirus reaches the nucleus in a still encapsi- dated form, and the viral genome is readily found in association cell receptor recognition by virions [4] and, therefore, to be with the nuclear matrix. This association is thought to be the main antigenic determinants. The £exible C-terminal arms essential for viral replication. In order to identify the protein(s) form interpentameric contacts and the basic amino acids of involved in the virus-nuclear matrix interaction, we focused on the N terminal arm are responsible for the non-speci¢c DNA- the possible roles exerted by the multifunctional cellular nuclear binding activity of VP1 [6,7]. matrix protein Yin Yang 1 (YY1) and by the viral major capsid The necessity for viral genomes to associate to the nuclear protein VP1. In the present work we report on the in vivo matrix (NM) in order to be expressed, has been demonstrated association between YY1 and VP1. -
Cryptic Inoviruses Revealed As Pervasive in Bacteria and Archaea Across Earth’S Biomes
ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0510-x Corrected: Author Correction Cryptic inoviruses revealed as pervasive in bacteria and archaea across Earth’s biomes Simon Roux 1*, Mart Krupovic 2, Rebecca A. Daly3, Adair L. Borges4, Stephen Nayfach1, Frederik Schulz 1, Allison Sharrar5, Paula B. Matheus Carnevali 5, Jan-Fang Cheng1, Natalia N. Ivanova 1, Joseph Bondy-Denomy4,6, Kelly C. Wrighton3, Tanja Woyke 1, Axel Visel 1, Nikos C. Kyrpides1 and Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh 1* Bacteriophages from the Inoviridae family (inoviruses) are characterized by their unique morphology, genome content and infection cycle. One of the most striking features of inoviruses is their ability to establish a chronic infection whereby the viral genome resides within the cell in either an exclusively episomal state or integrated into the host chromosome and virions are continuously released without killing the host. To date, a relatively small number of inovirus isolates have been extensively studied, either for biotechnological applications, such as phage display, or because of their effect on the toxicity of known bacterial pathogens including Vibrio cholerae and Neisseria meningitidis. Here, we show that the current 56 members of the Inoviridae family represent a minute fraction of a highly diverse group of inoviruses. Using a machine learning approach lever- aging a combination of marker gene and genome features, we identified 10,295 inovirus-like sequences from microbial genomes and metagenomes. Collectively, our results call for reclassification of the current Inoviridae family into a viral order including six distinct proposed families associated with nearly all bacterial phyla across virtually every ecosystem. -
Opportunistic Intruders: How Viruses Orchestrate ER Functions to Infect Cells
REVIEWS Opportunistic intruders: how viruses orchestrate ER functions to infect cells Madhu Sudhan Ravindran*, Parikshit Bagchi*, Corey Nathaniel Cunningham and Billy Tsai Abstract | Viruses subvert the functions of their host cells to replicate and form new viral progeny. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been identified as a central organelle that governs the intracellular interplay between viruses and hosts. In this Review, we analyse how viruses from vastly different families converge on this unique intracellular organelle during infection, co‑opting some of the endogenous functions of the ER to promote distinct steps of the viral life cycle from entry and replication to assembly and egress. The ER can act as the common denominator during infection for diverse virus families, thereby providing a shared principle that underlies the apparent complexity of relationships between viruses and host cells. As a plethora of information illuminating the molecular and cellular basis of virus–ER interactions has become available, these insights may lead to the development of crucial therapeutic agents. Morphogenesis Viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies to establish The ER is a membranous system consisting of the The process by which a virus infection. Some viruses bind to cellular receptors and outer nuclear envelope that is contiguous with an intri‑ particle changes its shape and initiate entry, whereas others hijack cellular factors that cate network of tubules and sheets1, which are shaped by structure. disassemble the virus particle to facilitate entry. After resident factors in the ER2–4. The morphology of the ER SEC61 translocation delivering the viral genetic material into the host cell and is highly dynamic and experiences constant structural channel the translation of the viral genes, the resulting proteins rearrangements, enabling the ER to carry out a myriad An endoplasmic reticulum either become part of a new virus particle (or particles) of functions5. -
Metagenomic Identification of Diverse Animal Hepaciviruses and Pegiviruses
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.16.100149; this version posted May 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Metagenomic identification of diverse animal hepaciviruses and 2 pegiviruses 3 4 5 Ashleigh F. Porter1, John H.-O. Pettersson1,2, Wei-Shan Chang1, Erin Harvey1, Karrie Rose3, 6 Mang Shi5, John-Sebastian Eden1,4, Jan Buchmann1, Craig Moritz6, Edward C. Holmes1 7 8 9 1. Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and 10 Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, 11 Sydney, Australia. 12 2. Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, 13 Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 14 3. Australian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, 15 Mosman, Australia. 16 4. Centre for Virus Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, 17 Australia. 18 5. School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 19 6. Research School of Biology, and Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Australian National 20 University, Acton, ACT, Australia. 21 22 23 Address correspondence to: 24 Edward C. Holmes, 25 Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and 26 Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, 27 Sydney, Australia 28 [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.16.100149; this version posted May 17, 2020. -
Origins and Evolution of the Global RNA Virome
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/451740; this version posted October 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Origins and Evolution of the Global RNA Virome 2 Yuri I. Wolfa, Darius Kazlauskasb,c, Jaime Iranzoa, Adriana Lucía-Sanza,d, Jens H. 3 Kuhne, Mart Krupovicc, Valerian V. Doljaf,#, Eugene V. Koonina 4 aNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 5 b Vilniaus universitetas biotechnologijos institutas, Vilnius, Lithuania 6 c Département de Microbiologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France 7 dCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Madrid, Spain 8 eIntegrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 9 Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA 10 fDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 11 12 #Address correspondence to Valerian V. Dolja, [email protected] 13 14 Running title: Global RNA Virome 15 16 KEYWORDS 17 virus evolution, RNA virome, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, phylogenomics, horizontal 18 virus transfer, virus classification, virus taxonomy 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/451740; this version posted October 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 ABSTRACT 20 Viruses with RNA genomes dominate the eukaryotic virome, reaching enormous diversity in 21 animals and plants. The recent advances of metaviromics prompted us to perform a detailed 22 phylogenomic reconstruction of the evolution of the dramatically expanded global RNA virome. -
Receptor-Binding and Oncogenic Properties of Polyoma Viruses Isolated from Feral Mice
Receptor-Binding and Oncogenic Properties of Polyoma Viruses Isolated from Feral Mice John Carroll1[, Dilip Dey1[, Lori Kreisman1[, Palanivel Velupillai1, Jean Dahl1, Samuel Telford2, Roderick Bronson1, Thomas Benjamin1* 1 Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, 2 Department of Tropical Public Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America Laboratory strains of the mouse polyoma virus differ markedly in their abilities to replicate and induce tumors in newborn mice. Major determinants of pathogenicity lie in the sialic binding pocket of the major capsid protein Vp1 and dictate receptor-binding properties of the virus. Substitutions at two sites in Vp1 define three prototype strains, which vary greatly in pathogenicity. These strains replicate in a limited fashion and induce few or no tumors, cause a disseminated infection leading to the development of multiple solid tumors, or replicate and spread acutely causing early death. This investigation was undertaken to determine the Vp1 type(s) of new virus isolates from naturally infected mice. Compared with laboratory strains, truly wild-type viruses are constrained with respect to their selectivity and avidity of binding to cell receptors. Fifteen of 15 new isolates carried the Vp1 type identical to that of highly tumorigenic laboratory strains. Upon injection into newborn laboratory mice, the new isolates induced a broad spectrum of tumors, including ones of epithelial as well as mesenchymal origin. Though invariant in their Vp1 coding sequences, these isolates showed considerable variation in their regulatory sequences. The common Vp1 type has two essential features: 1) failure to recognize ‘‘pseudoreceptors’’ with branched chain sialic acids binding to which would attenuate virus spread, and 2) maintenance of a hydrophobic contact with true receptors bearing a single sialic acid, which retards virus spread and avoids acute and potentially lethal infection of the host. -
Structural Basis and Evolution of Glycan Receptor Specificities Within the Polyomavirus Family
RESEARCH ARTICLE Host-Microbe Biology crossm Structural Basis and Evolution of Glycan Receptor Specificities within the Polyomavirus Family Luisa J. Ströh,a* Nils H. Rustmeier,a Bärbel S. Blaum,a Josephine Botsch,a Philip Rößler,a Florian Wedekink,a W. Ian Lipkin,b Nischay Mishra,b Thilo Stehlea,c Downloaded from aInterfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany bCenter for Infection and Immunity, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA cDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA ABSTRACT Asymptomatic infections with polyomaviruses in humans are common, but these small viruses can cause severe diseases in immunocompromised hosts. New Jersey polyomavirus (NJPyV) was identified via a muscle biopsy in an organ transplant recipient with systemic vasculitis, myositis, and retinal blindness, and hu- http://mbio.asm.org/ man polyomavirus 12 (HPyV12) was detected in human liver tissue. The evolutionary origins and potential diseases are not well understood for either virus. In order to define their receptor engagement strategies, we first used nuclear magnetic reso- nance (NMR) spectroscopy to establish that the major capsid proteins (VP1) of both viruses bind to sialic acid in solution. We then solved crystal structures of NJPyV and HPyV12 VP1 alone and in complex with sialylated glycans. NJPyV employs a novel binding site for a ␣2,3-linked sialic acid, whereas HPyV12 engages terminal ␣2,3- or ␣2,6-linked sialic acids in an exposed site similar to that found in Trichodysplasia on October 12, 2020 by guest spinulosa-associated polyomavirus (TSPyV). Gangliosides or glycoproteins, featuring in mammals usually terminal sialic acids, are therefore receptor candidates for both viruses. -
Arenaviridae Astroviridae Filoviridae Flaviviridae Hantaviridae
Hantaviridae 0.7 Filoviridae 0.6 Picornaviridae 0.3 Wenling red spikefish hantavirus Rhinovirus C Ahab virus * Possum enterovirus * Aronnax virus * * Wenling minipizza batfish hantavirus Wenling filefish filovirus Norway rat hunnivirus * Wenling yellow goosefish hantavirus Starbuck virus * * Porcine teschovirus European mole nova virus Human Marburg marburgvirus Mosavirus Asturias virus * * * Tortoise picornavirus Egyptian fruit bat Marburg marburgvirus Banded bullfrog picornavirus * Spanish mole uluguru virus Human Sudan ebolavirus * Black spectacled toad picornavirus * Kilimanjaro virus * * * Crab-eating macaque reston ebolavirus Equine rhinitis A virus Imjin virus * Foot and mouth disease virus Dode virus * Angolan free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * * Human cosavirus E Seoul orthohantavirus Little free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * African bat icavirus A Tigray hantavirus Human Zaire ebolavirus * Saffold virus * Human choclo virus *Little collared fruit bat ebolavirus Peleg virus * Eastern red scorpionfish picornavirus * Reed vole hantavirus Human bundibugyo ebolavirus * * Isla vista hantavirus * Seal picornavirus Human Tai forest ebolavirus Chicken orivirus Paramyxoviridae 0.4 * Duck picornavirus Hepadnaviridae 0.4 Bildad virus Ned virus Tiger rockfish hepatitis B virus Western African lungfish picornavirus * Pacific spadenose shark paramyxovirus * European eel hepatitis B virus Bluegill picornavirus Nemo virus * Carp picornavirus * African cichlid hepatitis B virus Triplecross lizardfish paramyxovirus * * Fathead minnow picornavirus -
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put up Or Shut Up
viruses Review Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up Alex S. Hartlage 1,2 and Amit Kapoor 1,3,* 1 Center for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; [email protected] 2 Medical Scientist Training Program, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA 3 Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in- depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection. -
Ribavirin Inhibits West Nile Virus Replication and Cytopathic Effect in Neural Cells
1214 CONCISE COMMUNICATION Ribavirin Inhibits West Nile Virus Replication and Cytopathic Effect in Neural Cells Ingo Jordan,1 Thomas Briese,1 Nicole Fischer,1 1Emerging Diseases Laboratory, Departments of Microbiology Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau,2 and W. Ian Lipkin1 and Molecular Genetics, Neurology, and Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, and 2ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, California West Nile virus (WNV) is an emerging mosquito-borne pathogen that was reported for the ®rst time in the Western hemisphere in August 1999, when an encephalitis outbreak in New York City resulted in 62 clinical cases and 7 deaths. WNV, for which no antiviral therapy has been described, was recently recovered from a pool of mosquitoes collected in New York City. In anticipation of the recurrence of WNV during the summer of 2000, an analysis was made of the ef®cacy of the nucleoside analogue ribavirin, a broad-spectrum antiviral compound with activity against several RNA viruses, for treatment of WNV infection. High doses of ribavirin were found to inhibit WNV replication and cytopathogenicity in human neural cells in vitro. The Flaviviridae, a family of enveloped positive-strand RNA substantial [3]. Genetic analysis of the envelope protein se- viruses, include West Nile virus (WNV), as well as other sig- quence indicated that the viral strain most closely resembled ni®cant human pathogens, such as hepatitis C, yellow fever, an isolate from a goose in Israel in 1998, demonstrating the dengue, Japanese encephalitis, and St. Louis encephalitis vi- wide geographic distribution of this emerging pathogen [4, 5]. ruses [1]. Whereas hepatitis C virus (genus Hepacivirus) may Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C has been described [6]; how- be transmitted by blood products or sexual activity, most mem- ever, no speci®c treatment has been reported for WNV or other bers of the Flavivirus genus, including WNV, are transmitted ¯avivirus infections. -
Protein-Mediated Viral Latency Is a Novel Mechanism for Merkel Cell
Protein-mediated viral latency is a novel mechanism PNAS PLUS for Merkel cell polyomavirus persistence Hyun Jin Kwuna, Yuan Changa,1,2, and Patrick S. Moorea,1,2 aCancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Contributed by Patrick S. Moore, April 10, 2017 (sent for review March 8, 2017; reviewed by Daniel DiMaio and Peter M. Howley) Viral latency, in which a virus genome does not replicate in- binding. Expression of LT is known to be autoinhibited in two ways: dependently of the host cell genome and produces no infectious LT inhibits its own promoter in a negative feedback loop (5, 6), and particles, is required for long-term virus persistence. There is no a virus-encoded miRNA transcribed during early viral gene ex- known latency mechanism for chronic small DNA virus infections. pression inhibits LT mRNA expression (7–10). Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) causes an aggressive skin cancer Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) is a human polyomavirus that after prolonged infection and requires an active large T (LT) phos- causes ∼80% of human Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs), which phoprotein helicase to replicate. We show that evolutionarily are among the most severe skin cancers (11, 12). It was the first conserved MCV LT phosphorylation sites are constitutively recog- human pathogen discovered through nondirected transcriptome nized by cellular Fbw7, βTrCP, and Skp2 Skp-F-box-cullin (SCF) sequencing using an approach called digital transcriptome sub- E3 ubiquitin ligases, which degrade and suppress steady-state LT traction. MCV infection is nearly ubiquitous among human adults, protein levels. Knockdown of each of these E3 ligases enhances LT and MCC tumors arise as rare biological accidents after prolonged stability and promotes MCV genome replication. -
Conventional and Unconventional Mechanisms for Capping Viral Mrna
REVIEWS Conventional and unconventional mechanisms for capping viral mRNA Etienne Decroly1, François Ferron1, Julien Lescar1,2 and Bruno Canard1 Abstract | In the eukaryotic cell, capping of mRNA 5′ ends is an essential structural modification that allows efficient mRNA translation, directs pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA export from the nucleus, limits mRNA degradation by cellular 5′–3′ exonucleases and allows recognition of foreign RNAs (including viral transcripts) as ‘non-self’. However, viruses have evolved mechanisms to protect their RNA 5′ ends with either a covalently attached peptide or a cap moiety (7‑methyl-Gppp, in which p is a phosphate group) that is indistinguishable from cellular mRNA cap structures. Viral RNA caps can be stolen from cellular mRNAs or synthesized using either a host- or virus-encoded capping apparatus, and these capping assemblies exhibit a wide diversity in organization, structure and mechanism. Here, we review the strategies used by viruses of eukaryotic cells to produce functional mRNA 5′-caps and escape innate immunity. Pre-mRNA splicing The cap structure found at the 5′ end of eukaryotic reactions involved in the viral RNA-capping process, A post-transcriptional mRNAs consists of a 7‑methylguanosine (m7G) moi‑ and the specific cellular factors that trigger a response modification of pre-mRNA, in ety linked to the first nucleotide of the transcript via a from the innate immune system. which introns are excised and 5′–5′ triphosphate bridge1 (FIG. 1a). The cap has several exons are joined in order to form a translationally important biological roles, such as protecting mRNA Capping, decapping and turnover of host RNA functional, mature mRNA.