DOCSLIB.ORG

Geophysics Master (M.Sc.) SPO 2015 - Valid for All Students Who Started Before August 2020 Winter Term 2021/22 Date: 27/08/2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geophysics Master (M.Sc.) SPO 2015 - Valid for All Students Who Started Before August 2020 Winter Term 2021/22 Date: 27/08/2021 Module Handbook Geophysics Master (M.Sc.) SPO 2015 - valid for all students who started before August 2020 Winter term 2021/22 Date: 27/08/2021 KIT DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS, GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu Table Of Contents Table Of Contents 1. Current information ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Prologue.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3. Field of study structure......................................................................................................................................................................................12 3.1. Master Thesis ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2. Geophysics ................................................................................................................................................................................................12 3.3. Electives .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.4. Scientific Focusing Phase ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.5. Introduction to Scientific Practice ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.6. Interdisciplinary Qualifications .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.7. Additional Examinations .......................................................................................................................................................................14 4. Modules..................................................................................................................................................................................................................15 4.1. 3D reflection seismics - M-PHYS-103856 ...........................................................................................................................................15 4.2. Classical Physics Laboratory Course II - M-PHYS-101354 ............................................................................................................. 16 4.3. Eifel Seismology and Volcanology Course - M-PHYS-105382 .......................................................................................................17 4.4. Full-waveform Inversion, not graded - M-PHYS-104522 ...............................................................................................................18 4.5. Further Examinations - M-PHYS-102020 ...........................................................................................................................................19 4.6. Geological Hazards and Risk - M-PHYS-101833 .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.7. Geological Hazards and Risk, not graded - M-PHYS-105279 ........................................................................................................22 4.8. Geophysical Deep Sounding at Volcanoes and the Example of the Vogelsberg, graded - M-PHYS-101952 ................... 24 4.9. Geophysical Deep Sounding at Volcanoes and the Example of the Vogelsberg, not graded - M-PHYS-101872 ............26 4.10. Geophysical Monitoring of Tunnel Constructions - M-PHYS-103141 ....................................................................................... 27 4.11. Hazard and Risk Assessment of Mediterranean Volcanoes, graded - M-PHYS-101873 .......................................................28 4.12. Historical Seismology for Hazard Evaluation - M-PHYS-101961 ............................................................................................... 30 4.13. Induced Seismicity, graded - M-PHYS-101959 ............................................................................................................................... 31 4.14. In-Situ: Seismic Hazard in the Apennines - M-PHYS-104195 ..................................................................................................... 32 4.15. In-Situ: Summer School Bandung: Seismology/Geohazards - M-PHYS-104196 ....................................................................33 4.16. Interdisciplinary Qualifications - M-PHYS-102349 ....................................................................................................................... 35 4.17. International Workshop on Current Geophysical Research Topics - M-PHYS-105383 ........................................................36 4.18. Introduction to Scientific Practice [GEOP M EWA] - M-PHYS-101361 ....................................................................................... 37 4.19. Introduction to Volcanology, graded - M-PHYS-101866 ............................................................................................................. 38 4.20. Modern Physics Laboratory Course - M-PHYS-101355 ................................................................................................................40 4.21. Modul Master Thesis - M-PHYS-101730 ............................................................................................................................................41 4.22. Module Wildcard Electives - M-PHYS-103142 ................................................................................................................................ 43 4.23. Near Surface Geophysical Prospecting - M-PHYS-101946 ......................................................................................................... 44 4.24. Near-surface seismic and GPR - M-PHYS-103855 ........................................................................................................................ 45 4.25. Observatory Course - M-PHYS-105662 ............................................................................................................................................46 4.26. Physical Methods in Volcano Seismology - M-PHYS-105679 .....................................................................................................48 4.27. Physics of the Lithosphere, graded - M-PHYS-101960 ................................................................................................................ 49 4.28. Recent Geodynamics [GEOD-MPGF-1] - M-BGU-101030 .............................................................................................................. 51 4.29. Scientific Focusing Phase [GEOP M SP] - M-PHYS-101360 ..........................................................................................................53 4.30. Scientific Seminars [GEOP M WS] - M-PHYS-101357 .....................................................................................................................54 4.31. Seismic Data Processing with Final Report (graded) - M-PHYS-104186 ................................................................................. 56 4.32. Seismic Data Processing with final report (ungraded) - M-PHYS-104188 ..............................................................................58 4.33. Seismic Data Processing without final report (ungraded) - M-PHYS-104189 ....................................................................... 60 4.34. Seismometry, Signal Processing and Seismogram Analysis [GEOP M MSS] - M-PHYS-101358 ......................................... 62 4.35. Seminar on Recent Topics of Risk Science - M-PHYS-103803 ...................................................................................................65 4.36. Structural Geology and Tectonics - M-BGU-101996 .....................................................................................................................66 4.37. The Black Forest Observatory at Schiltach - M-PHYS-101870 ....................................................................................................67 4.38. Theory and Inversion of Seismic Waves [GEOP M TIW] - M-PHYS-101359 ..............................................................................68 5. Courses...................................................................................................................................................................................................................71 5.1. 3D reflection seismics - T-PHYS-107806 ............................................................................................................................................ 71 5.2. Classical Physics Laboratory Courses II - T-PHYS-102290 ............................................................................................................72 5.3. Eifel Seismology and Volcanology Course - T-PHYS-110870 ........................................................................................................73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insights from the P Wave Travel Time Tomography in the Upper Mantle Beneath the Central Philippines
    remote sensing Article Insights from the P Wave Travel Time Tomography in the Upper Mantle Beneath the Central Philippines Huiyan Shi 1 , Tonglin Li 1,*, Rui Sun 2, Gongbo Zhang 3, Rongzhe Zhang 1 and Xinze Kang 1 1 College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, No.938 Xi Min Zhu Street, Changchun 130026, China; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (X.K.) 2 CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China; [email protected] 3 State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this paper, we present a high resolution 3-D tomographic model of the upper mantle obtained from a large number of teleseismic travel time data from the ISC in the central Philippines. There are 2921 teleseismic events and 32,224 useful relative travel time residuals picked to compute the velocity structure in the upper mantle, which was recorded by 87 receivers and satisfied the requirements of teleseismic tomography. Crustal correction was conducted to these data before inversion. The fast-marching method (FMM) and a subspace method were adopted in the forward step and inversion step, respectively. The present tomographic model clearly images steeply subduct- ing high velocity anomalies along the Manila trench in the South China Sea (SCS), which reveals a gradual changing of the subduction angle and a gradual shallowing of the subduction depth from the north to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysics (3 Credits) Spring 2018
    GEO 3010 – Geophysics (3 credits) Spring 2018 Lecture: FASB 250, 10:45-11:35 am, M & W Lab: FASB 250, 2:00-5:00 pm, M or W Instructor: Fan-Chi Lin (Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geology & Geophysics) Office: FASB 271 Phone: 801-581-4373 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: M, W 11:45 am - 1:00 pm. Please feel free to email me if you would like to make an appointment to meet at a different time. Teaching Assistants: Elizabeth Berg ([email protected]) FASB 288 Yadong Wang ([email protected]) FASB 288 Office Hours: T, H 1:00-3:00 pm Website: http://noise.earth.utah.edu/GEO3010/ Course Description: Prerequisite: MATH 1220 (Calculus II). Co-requisite: GEO 3080 (Earth Materials I). Recommended Prerequisite: PHYS 2220 (Phycs For Scien. & Eng. II). Fulfills Quantitative Intensive BS. Applications of physical principles to solid-earth dynamics and solid-earth structure, at both the scale of global tectonics and the smaller scale of subsurface exploration. Acquisition, modeling, and interpretation of seismic, gravity, magnetic, and electrical data in the context of exploration, geological engineering, and environmental problems. Two lectures, one lab weekly. 1. Policies Grades: Final grades are based on following weights: • Homework (25 %) • Labs (25 %) • Exam 1-3 (10% each) • Final (20 %) Homework: There will be approximately 6 homework sets. Homework must be turned in by 5 pm of the day they are due. 10 % will be marked off for each day they are late. Homework will not be accepted 3 days after the due day. Geophysics – GEO 3010 1 Labs: Do not miss labs! In general you will not have a chance to make up missed labs.
    [Show full text]
  • The East African Rift System in the Light of KRISP 90
    ELSEVIER Tectonophysics 236 (1994) 465-483 The East African rift system in the light of KRISP 90 G.R. Keller a, C. Prodehl b, J. Mechie b,l, K. Fuchs b, M.A. Khan ‘, P.K.H. Maguire ‘, W.D. Mooney d, U. Achauer e, P.M. Davis f, R.P. Meyer g, L.W. Braile h, 1.0. Nyambok i, G.A. Thompson J a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0555, USA b Geophysikalisches Institut, Universitdt Karlwuhe, Hertzstrasse 16, D-76187Karlsruhe, Germany ’ Department of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LEl 7RH, UK d U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Earthquake Research, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA ’ Institut de Physique du Globe, Universite’ de Strasbourg, 5 Rue Ret& Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg, France ‘Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA ’ Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wuconsin at Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA h Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA i Department of Geology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 14576, Nairobi, Kenya ’ Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Received 21 September 1992; accepted 8 November 1993 Abstract On the basis of a test experiment in 1985 (KRISP 85) an integrated seismic-refraction/ teleseismic survey (KRISP 90) was undertaken to study the deep structure beneath the Kenya rift down to depths of NO-150 km. This paper summarizes the highlights of KRISP 90 as reported in this volume and discusses their broad implications as well as the structure of the Kenya rift in the general framework of other continental rifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the New W4300 Course in DEES: “The Earth's Deep Interior” Instructor: Paul G
    Summary of the new W4300 course in DEES: “The Earth's Deep Interior” Instructor: Paul G. Richards ([email protected]) This course emphasizes the geophysical study of Earth structure below the crust, drawing upon geodesy, geomagnetism, gravity, thermal studies, seismology, and some geochemistry. It covers the principal techniques by which discoveries have been made in deep Earth structure, and describes particular features of the mantle, and fluid and solid cores, such as: • the upper mantle beneath old and young oceans and continents • the transition zone in the mantle between about 400 and 700 km depth (within which density and elastic moduli increase anomalously with depth), • the lowermost mantle and core/mantle boundary (across which density doubles and sound speed halves), and • the outer core/inner core boundary (discovered by seismology, and profoundly affecting the Earth's magnetic field). The course is part of the core curriculum for graduate students in solid Earth geophysics and marine geophysics, is an elective for solid Earth geochemistry and geology, and is accessible to undergraduate science majors with adequate math and physics. The course, together with EESC W 4950x (Math Methods in the Earth Sciences), replaces the previous W 4945x – 4946y (Geophysical Theory I and II). It includes parts of previous courses (no longer listed) in seismology, geomagnetism, and thermal history. Emphasis is on current structure, rather than evaluation of dynamic processes (such as convection). Prerequisites calculus, differential
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Wavefield Imaging of Earth's Interior Across Scales
    TECHNICAL REVIEWS Seismic wavefield imaging of Earth’s interior across scales Jeroen Tromp Abstract | Seismic full- waveform inversion (FWI) for imaging Earth’s interior was introduced in the late 1970s. Its ultimate goal is to use all of the information in a seismogram to understand the structure and dynamics of Earth, such as hydrocarbon reservoirs, the nature of hotspots and the forces behind plate motions and earthquakes. Thanks to developments in high- performance computing and advances in modern numerical methods in the past 10 years, 3D FWI has become feasible for a wide range of applications and is currently used across nine orders of magnitude in frequency and wavelength. A typical FWI workflow includes selecting seismic sources and a starting model, conducting forward simulations, calculating and evaluating the misfit, and optimizing the simulated model until the observed and modelled seismograms converge on a single model. This method has revealed Pleistocene ice scrapes beneath a gas cloud in the Valhall oil field, overthrusted Iberian crust in the western Pyrenees mountains, deep slabs in subduction zones throughout the world and the shape of the African superplume. The increased use of multi- parameter inversions, improved computational and algorithmic efficiency , and the inclusion of Bayesian statistics in the optimization process all stand to substantially improve FWI, overcoming current computational or data- quality constraints. In this Technical Review, FWI methods and applications in controlled- source and earthquake seismology are discussed, followed by a perspective on the future of FWI, which will ultimately result in increased insight into the physics and chemistry of Earth’s interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Text PDF (Final Published Version)
    Pritchard, M. E., de Silva, S. L., Michelfelder, G., Zandt, G., McNutt, S. R., Gottsmann, J., West, M. E., Blundy, J., Christensen, D. H., Finnegan, N. J., Minaya, E., Sparks, R. S. J., Sunagua, M., Unsworth, M. J., Alvizuri, C., Comeau, M. J., del Potro, R., Díaz, D., Diez, M., ... Ward, K. M. (2018). Synthesis: PLUTONS: Investigating the relationship between pluton growth and volcanism in the Central Andes. Geosphere, 14(3), 954-982. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01578.1 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY-NC Link to published version (if available): 10.1130/GES01578.1 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Geo Science World at https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01578.1 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: PLUTONS: Investigating the Relationship between Pluton Growth and Volcanism in the Central Andes GEOSPHERE Synthesis: PLUTONS: Investigating the relationship between pluton growth and volcanism in the Central Andes GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 3 M.E. Pritchard1,2, S.L. de Silva3, G. Michelfelder4, G. Zandt5, S.R. McNutt6, J. Gottsmann2, M.E. West7, J. Blundy2, D.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Journal International
    Geophysical Journal International Geophys. J. Int. (2017) 209, 1892–1905 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx133 Advance Access publication 2017 April 1 GJI Seismology Surface wave imaging of the weakly extended Malawi Rift from ambient-noise and teleseismic Rayleigh waves from onshore and lake-bottom seismometers N.J. Accardo,1 J.B. Gaherty,1 D.J. Shillington,1 C.J. Ebinger,2 A.A. Nyblade,3 G.J. Mbogoni,4 P.R.N. Chindandali,5 R.W. Ferdinand,6 G.D. Mulibo,6 G. Kamihanda,4 D. Keir,7,8 C. Scholz,9 K. Selway,10 J.P. O’Donnell,11 G. Tepp,12 R. Gallacher,7 K. Mtelela,6 J. Salima5 and A. Mruma4 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118,USA 3Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802,USA 4Geological Survey of Tanzania, Dodoma, Tanzania 5Geological Survey Department of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi 6Department of Geology, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 7National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton S017 1BJ, United Kingdom 8Dipartimento di Scienzedella Terra, Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Florence 50121,Italy 9Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, New York, NY 13210,USA 10Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 11School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29JT, United Kingdom 12Alaska Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK 99775,USA Accepted 2017 March 28. Received 2017 March 13; in original form 2016 October 12 SUMMARY Located at the southernmost sector of the Western Branch of the East African Rift System, the Malawi Rift exemplifies an active, magma-poor, weakly extended continental rift.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Tomography Shows That Upwelling Beneath Iceland Is Confined to the Upper Mantle
    Geophys. J. Int. (2001) 146, 504–530 Seismic tomography shows that upwelling beneath Iceland is confined to the upper mantle G. R. Foulger,1 M. J. Pritchard,1 B. R. Julian,2 J. R. Evans,2 R. M. Allen,3 G. Nolet,3 W. J. Morgan,3 B. H. Bergsson,4 P. Erlendsson,4 S. Jakobsdottir,4 S. Ragnarsson,4 R. Stefansson4 and K. Vogfjo¨rd5 1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2 US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA 3 Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Guyot Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544–5807, USA 4 Meteorological Office of Iceland, Bustadavegi 9, Reykjavik, Iceland 5 National Energy Authority, Grensasvegi 9, Reykjavik, Iceland Accepted 2001 April 3. Received 2001 March 19; in original form 2000 August 1 SUMMARY We report the results of the highest-resolution teleseismic tomography study yet performed of the upper mantle beneath Iceland. The experiment used data gathered by the Iceland Hotspot Project, which operated a 35-station network of continuously recording, digital, broad-band seismometers over all of Iceland 1996–1998. The structure of the upper mantle was determined using the ACH damped least-squares method and involved 42 stations, 3159 P-wave, and 1338 S-wave arrival times, including the phases P, pP, sP, PP, SP, PcP, PKIKP, pPKIKP, S, sS, SS, SKS and Sdiff. Artefacts, both perceptual and parametric, were minimized by well-tested smoothing techniques involving layer thinning and offset-and-averaging. Resolution is good beneath most of Iceland from y60 km depth to a maximum of y450 km depth and beneath the Tjornes Fracture Zone and near-shore parts of the Reykjanes ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Methods Commonly Employed for Geotechnical Site Characterization TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C130 October 2008 Geophysical Methods Commonly Employed for Geotechnical Site Characterization TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chair: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008–2009 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Director, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Paul H. Bingham, Principal, Global Insight, Inc., Washington, D.C., Freight Systems Group Chair Shelly R. Brown, Principal, Shelly Brown Associates, Seattle, Washington, Legal Resources Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair James M. Crites, Executive Vice President, Operations, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, Aviation Group Chair Leanna Depue, Director, Highway Safety Division, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, System Users Group Chair Arlene L. Dietz, A&C Dietz and Associates, LLC, Salem, Oregon, Marine Group Chair Robert M. Dorer, Acting Director, Office of Surface Transportation Programs, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rail Group Chair Karla H. Karash, Vice President, TranSystems Corporation, Medford, Massachusetts, Public Transportation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Katherine F. Turnbull, Associate Director, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Planning and Environment Group Chair Daniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
    Characteristics of Hawaiian Volcanoes Editors: Michael P. Poland, Taeko Jane Takahashi, and Claire M. Landowski U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1801, 2014 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory By Paul G. Okubo1, Jennifer S. Nakata1, and Robert Y. Koyanagi1 Abstract the Island of Hawai‘i. Over the past century, thousands of sci- entific reports and articles have been published in connection In the century since the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory with Hawaiian volcanism, and an extensive bibliography has (HVO) put its first seismographs into operation at the edge of accumulated, including numerous discussions of the history of Kīlauea Volcano’s summit caldera, seismic monitoring at HVO HVO and its seismic monitoring operations, as well as research (now administered by the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]) has results. From among these references, we point to Klein and evolved considerably. The HVO seismic network extends across Koyanagi (1980), Apple (1987), Eaton (1996), and Klein and the entire Island of Hawai‘i and is complemented by stations Wright (2000) for details of the early growth of HVO’s seismic installed and operated by monitoring partners in both the USGS network. In particular, the work of Klein and Wright stands and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The out because their compilation uses newspaper accounts and seismic data stream that is available to HVO for its monitoring other reports of the effects of historical earthquakes to extend of volcanic and seismic activity in Hawai‘i, therefore, is built Hawai‘i’s detailed seismic history to nearly a century before from hundreds of data channels from a diverse collection of instrumental monitoring began at HVO.
    [Show full text]
  • Gji-Keyword-List-Updated2016.Pdf
    COMPOSITION and PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Composition and structure of the continental crust Composition and structure of the core Composition and structure of the mantle Composition and structure of the oceanic crust Composition of the planets Creep and deformation Defects Elasticity and anelasticity Electrical properties Equations of state Fault zone rheology Fracture and flow Friction High-pressure behaviour Magnetic properties Microstructure Permeability and porosity Phase transitions Plasticity, diffusion, and creep GENERAL SUBJECTS Core Gas and hydrate systems Geomechanics Geomorphology Glaciology Heat flow Hydrogeophysics Hydrology Hydrothermal systems Instrumental noise Ionosphere/atmosphere interactions Ionosphere/magnetosphere interactions Mantle processes Ocean drilling Structure of the Earth Thermochronology Tsunamis Ultra-high pressure metamorphism Ultra-high temperature metamorphism GEODESY and GRAVITY Acoustic-gravity waves Earth rotation variations Geodetic instrumentation Geopotential theory Global change from geodesy Gravity anomalies and Earth structure Loading of the Earth Lunar and planetary geodesy and gravity Plate motions Radar interferometry Reference systems Satellite geodesy Satellite gravity Sea level change Seismic cycle Space geodetic surveys Tides and planetary waves Time variable gravity Transient deformation GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION Africa Antarctica Arctic region Asia Atlantic Ocean Australia Europe Indian Ocean Japan New Zealand North America Pacific Ocean South America GEOMAGNETISM and ELECTROMAGNETISM Archaeomagnetism
    [Show full text]
  • A Continuous Plate-Tectonic Model Using Geophysical Data to Estimate
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 133, 379–389, 1998 1 A continuous plate-tectonic model using geophysical data to estimate plate margin widths, with a seismicity based example Caroline Dumoulin1, David Bercovici2, Pal˚ Wessel Department of Geology & Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 96822, USA Summary A continuous kinematic model of present day plate motions is developed which 1) provides more realistic models of plate shapes than employed in the original work of Bercovici & Wessel [1994]; and 2) provides a means whereby geophysical data on intraplate deformation is used to estimate plate margin widths for all plates. A given plate’s shape function (which is unity within the plate, zero outside the plate) can be represented by analytic functions so long as the distance from a point inside the plate to the plate’s boundary can be expressed as a single valued function of azimuth (i.e., a single-valued polar function). To allow sufficient realism to the plate boundaries, without the excessive smoothing used by Bercovici and Wessel, the plates are divided along pseudoboundaries; the boundaries of plate sections are then simple enough to be modelled as single-valued polar functions. Moreover, the pseudoboundaries have little or no effect on the final results. The plate shape function for each plate also includes a plate margin function which can be constrained by geophysical data on intraplate deformation. We demonstrate how this margin function can be determined by using, as an example data set, the global seismicity distribution for shallow (depths less than 29km) earthquakes of magnitude greater than 4.
    [Show full text]