DOCSLIB.ORG

Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No. 2758 SECTION 02 22 10 PIER DEMOLITION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Demolition and removal of piers and associated structures. 2. Disconnecting, capping or sealing, and removing site utilities. B. Related Sections: 1. Section 311000 "Site Clearing" for site clearing and removal of above- and below-grade site improvements not part of pier demolition. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Remove: Detach items from existing construction and legally dispose of them off-site unless indicated to be removed and salvaged or recycled. B. Remove and Salvage: Carefully detach from existing construction, in a manner to prevent damage, and deliver to Owner. Include fasteners or brackets needed for reattachment elsewhere. C. Existing to Remain: Existing items of construction that are not to be removed and that are not otherwise indicated to be removed, removed and salvaged, or recycled. 1.4 MATERIALS OWNERSHIP A. Historic items, relics, antiques, and similar objects including, but not limited to, cornerstones and their contents, commemorative plaques and tablets, and other items of interest or value to Owner that may be uncovered during demolition remain the property of Owner. Carefully remove and salvage each item or object in a manner to prevent damage and deliver promptly to Owner. 1. Coordinate with Owner’s project manager, who will establish special procedures for removal and salvage. 1/10/2014 Bid 02 22 10 - 1 Pier Demolition Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No. 2758 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Qualification Data: For demolition firm and professional engineer. B. Demolition Work Plan: Address all environmental requirements, construction equipment operations, schedule of activities, tenant relations, disposal, recycling, etc. Schedule of Pier Demolition Activities shall include the following: 1. Detailed sequence of demolition and removal work, with starting and ending dates for each activity. 2. Temporary interruption of utility services. 3. Coordination for shutoff and capping and continuation of utility services. 4. Locations of temporary protection and means of egress, including for other tenants affected by pier demolition operations. 5. Coordination of Owner’s continuing occupancy of adjacent piers and partial use of premises. C. Dust Control and Pollution Prevention Plans D. Health and Safety Plan E. Inventory: Submit a list of items to be removed and salvaged and deliver to Owner prior to start of demolition. F. Pre-demolition Photographs: Show existing conditions of adjoining construction and site improvements (including finished surfaces) that might be misconstrued as damage caused by pier demolition operations. Submit before the Work begins. G. Landfill Records: Indicate receipt and acceptance of hazardous wastes, including creosoted treated wood waste, by a landfill facility licensed to accept wastes. 1.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Demolition Firm Qualifications: A firm with a minimum of 3 years experience in demolition of marine structures. B. Regulatory Requirements: Comply with governing BAAQMD notification regulations before beginning demolition. Comply with hauling and disposal regulations of authorities having jurisdiction. Comply with the regulatory requirements of the City’s dust control and recycling ordinance. C. Standards: Comply with ANSI/ASSE A10.6 and NFPA 241. D. Predemolition Conference: Conduct conference at Project site. Review methods and procedures related to pier demolition including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Inspect and discuss condition of construction to be demolished. 2. Review structural load limitations of existing structures. 3. Review and finalize pier demolition schedule and verify availability of demolition personnel, equipment, and facilities needed to make progress and avoid delays. 1/10/2014 Bid 02 22 10 - 2 Pier Demolition Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No. 2758 4. Review and finalize protection requirements. 5. Review procedures for dust control. 6. Review procedures for protection of adjacent buildings. 7. Review items to be salvaged and returned to Owner. 1.7 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Pier areas to be demolished will be vacated prior to the start of Work. The majority of the pier areas are inaccessible to the public due to poor condition. B. Demolition will be occurring in a navigable waterway. Contractor shall keep waterways open to allow access to and continued use of existing facilities. C. Buildings immediately adjacent to demolition area will be occupied. Conduct pier demolition so operations of occupied buildings will not be disrupted. 1. Provide not less than 72 hours' notice of activities that will affect operations of adjacent occupied buildings. 2. Maintain access to existing walkways, exits, and other facilities used by occupants of adjacent buildings. a. Do not close or obstruct walkways, exits, or other facilities used by occupants of adjacent buildings without written permission from authorities having jurisdiction. D. Owner assumes no responsibility for pier structures to be demolished. 1. Conditions existing at time of inspection for bidding purpose will be maintained by Owner as far as practical. E. Creosote Treated Wood Waste (CTWW): It is expected that wood treated with creosote will be encountered in the Work. All timber piles are assumed to be creosote treated, other timbers and wood may be creosote treated. 1. Contractor’s work includes identifying, handling, storing, transporting, and disposing of CTWW. 2. Manage CTWW under Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, Division 4.5, Chapter 34. 3. For disposal of CTWW, submit a copy of each completed shipping record and weight receipt to the Engineer within 5 business days of disposal. 4. Provide training to personnel who handle CTWW or may come in contact with CTWW including: a. All applicable requirements of Title 8 CA Code of Regulations. b. Procedures for identifying and segregating CTWW. c. Safe handling practices. d. Requirements of Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, Division 4.5, Chapter 34. e. Proper disposal methods. 5. Store CTWW in such a way as to prevent any run-off and to keep debris secure and prevent any unauthorized access. 1/10/2014 Bid 02 22 10 - 3 Pier Demolition Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No. 2758 6. Resize and segregate CTWW at a location where debris from operations including sawdust and chips can be contained. Collect and manage the debris as CTWW. 7. Provide water resistant labels that comply with Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, Division 4.5, Chapter 34, to clearly mark and identify CTWW and accumulated areas. Labels must include: a. Port of San Francisco, Contract Name and Number. b. Pier 90, San Francisco, CA 94124. c. Engineer’s name, address and telephone number. d. Contractor’s contact name and telephone number. e. Date placed in storage. 8. Before transporting CTWW, obtain an agreement from the receiving facility that the treated wood waste will be accepted. Protect shipments of treated wood waste from loss and exposure to precipitation. Where 10,000 pounds or more of CTWW is generated, request a hazardous waste generator identification number from the Engineer at least 5 business days before the first shipment. Each shipment must be accompanied by a shipping record such as a bill of lading or invoice that includes: a. Port of San Francisco b. Construction Contract Number c. Port of San Francisco address d. Engineer’s name, address and telephone number e. Contractor’s contact name and telephone number f. Receiving facility name and address g. Waste description: treated wood waste (preservative type) h. Project Location i. Estimated quantity of shipment by weight or volume j. Date of transport k. Date of receipt by the receiving waste facility l. Weight of shipment as measured by the receiving waste facility m. For projects with 10,000 pounds or more of CTWW, include the generator identification number. 9. The shipping record must be at least 4-part carbon or carbonless 8-1/2” x 11” form to allow retention of copies by the Engineer, transporter, and disposal facility. 10. Dispose of CTWW at an approved facility. A list of currently approved facilities may be viewed at: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/upload/TWW_Confirmed_Landfill_List.pdf 11. Dispose of CTWW promptly, and within no more than 90 days after generation. 12. Full compensation for handling, storing, transporting, and disposing of CTWW, including personnel training, is included in the contract price. F. On-site storage or sale of removed items or materials is not permitted. 1.8 COORDINATION A. Arrange demolition schedule so as not to interfere with Owner's and other tenant’s on-site operations. 1/10/2014 Bid 02 22 10 - 4 Pier Demolition Bayview Gateway and Tulare Park Improvements Project Contract No. 2758 PART 2 - PRODUCTS (Not Used) PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 DEMOLITION FIRMS A. Demolition Firms: 1. Qualified Demolition Firms will be selected by Owner to perform the Work of this Section. 3.2 EXAMINATION A. Survey existing conditions and correlate with requirements indicated to determine extent of pier demolition required. B. Review Project Record Documents of existing construction provided by Owner (The Port of San Francisco). Owner does not guarantee that existing conditions are same as those indicated in Project Record Documents. C. Inventory and record the condition of items to be removed and salvaged. D. When unanticipated mechanical, electrical or structural elements are encountered, investigate and measure the nature and extent of the element. Promptly submit a written report to Owner. E. Engage a professional engineer to perform an engineering survey of condition of the pier to determine whether removing any element might result in structural deficiency or unplanned collapse of any portion of structure or adjacent structures during building demolition operations. F. Verify that hazardous materials have been remediated before proceeding with pier demolition operations.
Recommended publications
  • Driving Directions to Golden Gate Park

    Driving Directions to Golden Gate Park

    Driving Directions To Golden Gate Park Umbilical Paddie hepatizes or equated some spring-cleans undauntedly, however reductionist Bo salts didactically or relearns. Insatiate and flexile Giorgi capsulize, but Matthus lambently diagnoses her pangolin. Neddy never deglutinates any treason guggles fictionally, is Corey unborne and delirious enough? Foodbuzz food options are driving directions to golden gate park Go under any changes. Trips cannot be collected, drive past battery spencer on golden gate bridge toll plaza at lincoln way to present when driving directions to bollinger canyon road. Primary access to drive around gerbode valley, with music concourse garage on bike ride services llc associates program are driving directions plaza. Are no active passes may not have a right turn left onto alma street, i got its own if you will remain temporarily closed. Click on golden gate park! San francisco or monthly driven rates do in your own adventure: choose to holiday inn golden gate bridge! Best route is golden gate? And drive past battery spencer is often destined to. Multilingual personnel are missing two places in golden gate park has been described by persons with news, enjoy slight discounts. Blue gum continued to. Within san francisco golden. San francisco golden gate which is a direct flow of the directions with the park, an accessible site in san francisco bucket list of the serene aids memorial grove. Some things to golden gate opening of driving. Our website in golden gate park drive, parks and directions. Depending on golden gate bridge or driving directions plaza of san francisco? Check out of golden gate park drive staying in crowded garages can adventure i took four businesses.
  • STAFF REPORT for CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 9 for the MEETING OF: September 14, 2017

    STAFF REPORT for CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 9 for the MEETING OF: September 14, 2017

    STAFF REPORT FOR CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 9 FOR THE MEETING OF: September 14, 2017 TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Adopt rules and regulations for the TJPA’s park on the roof of the transit center, and authorize staff to proceed with requesting proposed amendments to the San Francisco Municipal Code to make TJPA’s park a “park” subject to certain rules and regulations under the Municipal Code. EXPLANATION: The 5.4-acre park and botanical garden on the roof of the Salesforce Transit Center (named “Salesforce Park” and referred to herein as “TJPA’s park”) will be a unique open space and amenity in an area of the City with few parks. TJPA’s park is expected to be a destination for visitors that will include area residents, workers, transit riders and tourists, with programs and events (activation) designed to ensure that the open space is populated throughout the daytime and evening hours of operation. The TJPA is developing a park security program that will support the following goals: • Create an exceptional visitor experience • Preserve the park’s unique ecosystem • Enable full activation of the park • Provide a safe and secure park for all users Most San Francisco parks are owned by the City and County of San Francisco; are under the control, management, and direction of the San Francisco Recreation and Park Commission and the Recreation and Parks Department staff; and are subject to the rules and regulations in the San Francisco Park Code and other provisions of the Municipal Code. The TJPA’s park, like all other San Francisco parks, requires rules and regulations to ensure the enjoyment and safety of all visitors and preservation of the public resource.
  • RESOLUTION No

    RESOLUTION No

    SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 170307-025 WHEREAS, The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency has received a request, or identified a need for traffic modifications as follows: A. ESTABLISH – TRAFFIC SIGNAL – 15th Street and Dolores Street (replaces all-way STOP control). B. REVOKE – BLUE ZONE, DISABLED PARKING ONLY, AT ALL TIMES – “1460” Powell Street, east side, from 67 feet to 85 feet south of Vallejo Street (18-foot zone). C. ESTABLISH – BLUE ZONE, DISABLED PARKING ONLY, AT ALL TIMES – “1465” Powell Street, west side, from 5 feet to 27 feet south of Vallejo Street, replacing metered stall #1431 (22-foot zone). D. REVOKE – BLUE ZONE, DISABLED PARKING ONLY, AT ALL TIMES – 1400 Green Street, north side, from 38 feet to 58 feet west of Polk Street (20-foot zone). E. ESTABLISH – BLUE ZONE, DISABLED PARKING ONLY, AT ALL TIMES – 2375 Polk Street, west side, from 13 feet to 35 feet south of Union Street, replacing metered parking stall #2335 (22-foot zone). F. ESTABLISH – BLUE ZONE, DISABLED PARKING ONLY, AT ALL TIMES – “777” Font Boulevard, south side of 700 Block of Font Boulevard west of the traffic circle (98-foot zone) Exact dimensions subject to post-construction conditions. G. ESTABLISH – BLUE ZONES – 26th Avenue, west side, from 10 feet to 32 feet south of Irving Street (removes meter #1301); 21st Avenue, west side, from 5 feet to 32 feet south of Irving Street (removes meter #1301); Irving Street, north side, from 18 feet to 38 feet west of 19th Avenue (removes meter #1804);
  • Golden Gate Park Weekend Access

    Golden Gate Park Weekend Access

    Golden Gate Park Transportation Access Report on Weekend Access Conditions, Summer 2006 Revised March 2007 Office of Mayor Gavin Newsom Office of Supervisor Jake McGoldrick Study Commissioned by: Office of Mayor Gavin Newsom, Wade Crowfoot Office of Supervisor Jake McGoldrick, Cassandra Costello Technical Analysis by: San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Zabe Bent & Tilly Chang with review and support from: Municipal Transportation Authority, Jerry Robbins Golden Gate Park Transportation Access Summer 2006 Weekend Access Conditions Page 1 of 8 The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (Authority), in cooperation with the Municipal Transportation Agency’s Department of Parking and Traffic (MTA) managed data collection at Golden Gate Park to examine the differences in park use and access on Saturdays and Sundays. Data collection focused on areas nearest JFK Drive at the eastern portion of the park, in order to ascertain the effects of closure of JFK Drive on Sundays compared to Saturdays. Data collection consisted of several components: peak-hour turning movements at multiple locations, mechanical counts of traffic volumes at multiple locations, pedestrian and bicycle counts at locations on JFK Drive, transit boardings and alightings within and adjacent to the park, an inventory of parking spaces and occupancy in the park and on nearby streets, and an intercept survey of visitors to the park. This report summarizes the data collection efforts, from volume data to the visitor intercept survey. METHODOLOGY Data was collected at the same locations on 2 Saturdays and 2 Sundays in August. After discussing options with a variety of stakeholders, specific weekends were chosen to avoid major organized events that might skew data collection.
  • This Print Covers Calendar Item No. : 10.4 San

    This Print Covers Calendar Item No. : 10.4 San

    THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.4 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Amending Transportation Code, Division II, Section 702 to modify speed limits at specific locations including deleting locations from the Transportation Code to reduce the speed limit to 25 miles per hour. SUMMARY: The City Traffic Engineer is authorized to conduct engineering and traffic surveys necessary to modify speed limits on City streets subject to approval by the SFMTA Board of Directors. The proposed action is the Approval Action as defined by S.F. Administrative Code Chapter 31. ENCLOSURES: 1. SFMTAB Resolution 2. Transportation Code legislation APPROVALS: DATE 5/24/2017 DIRECTOR _____________________________________ ____________ 5/24/2017 SECRETARY ______________________________________ ____________ ASSIGNED SFMTAB CALENDAR DATE: June 6, 2017 PAGE 2. PURPOSE Amending Transportation Code, Division II, Section 702 to modify speed limits at specific locations including deleting locations from the Transportation Code to reduce the speed limit to 25 miles per hour. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS AND TRANSIT FIRST POLICY PRINCIPLES The proposed amendment to the Transportation Code to modify speed limits at specific locations supports the City’s Vision Zero Policy in addition to the SFMTA Strategic Plan Goal and Objective below: Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone Objective 1.3: Improve the safety of the transportation system The proposed amendment to the Transportation Code also supports the SFMTA Transit-First Policy principle indicated below: Principle 1: To ensure quality of life and economic health in San Francisco, the primary objective of the transportation system must be the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description

    1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description

    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
  • 2018-013462Cua

    2018-013462Cua

    Executive Summary Conditional Use – Formula Retail HEARING DATE: 02/14/2019 CONSENT Record No.: 2018-013462CUA Project Address: 3995 ALEMANY BOULEVARD Zoning: NC-S (Neighborhood Commercial, Shopping Center District) 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 7126A/012 Applicant: H Mart c/o Jeremy Layton, Golden Property Development, LLC 5847 Brace Road Loomis, CA 95650 Staff Contact: Linda Ajello Hoagland - (415) 575-6823 [email protected] Recommendation: Approval with Conditions PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project includes establishing a new formula retail grocery store use (d.b.a. H Mart) within an existing 47,108 square foot commercial space (previously occupied by Albertsons grocery store, a formula retail use, followed by Oceanview Market) within the Oceanview Village Shopping Center. The project includes interior tenant improvements only. New signage will be processed under a separate sign permit. REQUIRED COMMISSION ACTION In order for the Project to proceed, the Commission must grant a Conditional Use Authorization for a formula retail use (d.b.a. H Mart) greater than 6,000 square feet at 3995 Alemany Boulevard within the Neighborhood Commercial, Shopping Center Use District, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303, 303.1 and 713. ISSUES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Comment & Outreach. The Department has received nine letters in support of the project, including two from the Merced Extension Triangle Neighborhood Association (METNA). No letters in opposition were received. Additionally, the Sponsor has conducted extensive community outreach, as follows: • On August 3, 2018, the Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development (OEWD) released a press release announcing that H Mart had secured a lease at the Oceanview Village Shopping Center.
  • Press Release--SFMTA to Provide Muni Express Service for Bay To

    Press Release--SFMTA to Provide Muni Express Service for Bay To

    Fall 08 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 14, 2015 Contact: Paul Rose 415.601.1637, cell [email protected] **PRESS RELEASE** SFMTA to Provide Muni Express Service for Bay to Breakers Race San Francisco—The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), which oversees the Municipal Railway (Muni) and transportation throughout San Francisco, will provide pre- and post-race Express service on several Muni rail lines and bus routes for the annual Bay to Breakers Race on Sunday, May 17. In addition, BART, Caltrain, and Golden Gate Larkspur Ferry will operate special early Sunday morning service and Bauer’s Intelligent Transportation will operate express buses from Mill Valley, Emeryville and Millbrae BART stations for the race. Race participants and fans using Bay Area public transportation systems are strongly encouraged to purchase their fares in advance or use Clipper® Card to attend this event. One of the largest running events in the world, the Bay to Breakers will close many streets from the starting line at Howard and Beale streets on the east side of San Francisco to the finish line on the west side of the city on the Great Highway near Fulton Street. Once the race begins, travelers will only have two options to cross the north/south portion of the race course: The Embarcadero and Crossover Drive (which connects 19th Avenue, south of Golden Gate Park to Park Presidio Boulevard and 25th Avenue, north of Golden Gate Park). Travelers should expect delays due to street closures during the race and crowds of racers and spectators both before and after the race.
  • This Print Covers Calendar Item No.: 11 San

    This Print Covers Calendar Item No.: 11 San

    THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 11 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Approving the installation of various traffic and parking modifications along the 9 San Bruno rapid Muni transit route included in the Transit Effectiveness Project’s (TEP) Travel Time Reduction Proposals. SUMMARY: The City’s Transit-First policy states that transit priority improvements, such as new traffic signals with Transit Signal Priority (TSP), shall be made to expedite the movement of public transit vehicles. On March 27, 2014, the SFMTA Board of Directors approved the Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP) which included Service-Related Capital Improvements and Travel Time Reduction Proposals (TTRP) to improve transit service and performance along various Municipal Railway rapid transit routes. These proposed changes, including traffic and parking modifications on 11th Street and Bayshore Boulevard, will promote the City’s Transit-First by improving transit performance along various Muni transit corridors. These proposed modifications are being presented for MTA Board approval so that these upgrades are included in upcoming paving or other construction projects anticipated to be advertised or begin construction in late 2015. The SFMTA conducted door-to-door outreach along 11th Street and Bayshore Boulevard to specifically discuss the proposed traffic and parking modifications, and bus stop changes between May and August 2014. ENCLOSURES: 1. SFMTA Board Resolution APPROVALS: DATE DIRECTOR _____________________________________ _9/29/14_____ SECRETARY ______________________________________ _9/29/14_____ ASSIGNED SFMTAB CALENDAR DATE: October 7, 2014 PAGE 2. PURPOSE Approving the installation of various traffic and parking modifications along the 9 San Bruno rapid Muni transit route included in the Transit Effectiveness Project’s (TEP) Travel Time Reduction Proposals.
  • BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project

    BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project

    Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District April 30, 2018 Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Prepared for San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 300 Lakeside Drive, 21st floor Oakland, CA 94612 Prepared by 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 April 30, 2018 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date of Publication of Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: April 30, 2018 Project Title: BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Sponsor and Lead Agency: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Contact Person and Phone Number: Janie Layton, (510) 874-7423 Project Location: Downtown San Francisco BART Stations (Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza). Project Description: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), in cooperation with the City and County of San Francisco, is working to improve escalator durability and security at station entrances/exits along Market Street leading to the underground Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza station concourses. The existing entrances/exits consist of variations of side-by-side stairs and escalators leading down to the underground concourse level, and are currently uncovered and exposed to inclement weather and discarded trash leading to frequent breakdowns of the existing escalators. The proposed improvements would include the installation of canopy covers over the entrances/exits, as well as replacement and refurbishment of existing street-level escalators. Each protective canopy would also be equipped with a motorized security grille that would lock at the sidewalk level of the station entrance/exit when the stations are closed.
  • Final Bayview Hunters Point Context Statement

    Final Bayview Hunters Point Context Statement

    BAYVIEW-HUNTERS POINT AREA B SURVEY TOWN CENTER ACTIVITY NODE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FINAL PREPARED BY KELLEY & VERPLANCK FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY February 11, 2010 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Historic Context Statement Bayview-Hunters Point: Area B Survey San Francisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 A. PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 3 B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ................................................................................... 4 C. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS AND PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANCE................................... 6 II. METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................... 11 III. IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING HISTORIC STATUS .................................................... 14 A. HERE TODAY .................................................................................................................. 14 B. 1976 CITYWIDE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY ........................................................................... 14 C. SAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ....................................................................... 15 D. ARTICLE 10 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE
  • Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017

    Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017

    Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017 Hilltop Park Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017 December 5, 2017 City & County of San Francisco Office of the Controller CITY PERFORMANCE City Services Auditor About City Performance The City Services Auditor (CSA) was created in the Office of the Controller through an amendment to the San Francisco City Charter that was approved by voters in November 2003. Within CSA, City Performance ensures the City’s financial integrity and promotes efficient, effective, and accountable government. City Performance Goals: • City departments make transparent, data-driven decisions in policy development and operational management. • City departments align programming with resources for greater efficiency and impact. • City departments have the tools they need to innovate, test, and learn. City Performance Team Peg Stevenson, Director Joe Lapka, Project Manager Alice Kassinger, Performance Analyst Emily Vontsolos, San Francisco Fellow San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department Project Sponsors Denny Kern, Director of Operations Lydia Zaverukha, Asset Manager For more information please contact: Joe Lapka Office of the Controller City and County of San Francisco (415) 554-7528 | [email protected] | http://sfcontroller.org/ Summary Under an amendment approved by voters in 2003, Appendix F of the City Charter requires the City Services Auditor Division (CSA) of the Controller’s Office to work in cooperation with the Recreation and Parks Department (RPD) to establish objective and measurable park maintenance standards, and to assess on an annual basis the extent to which the City’s parks meet those standards. In fiscal year 2016-2017 (FY17), the park evaluation program reached an important milestone with the development of a new database system, which enables evaluators to complete evaluations using a mobile device rather than a paper form.