2020 Volume 16 Issue 2
Contents
Articles Daniel Thym – Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’. The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review – 187 Michael Gordon – Referendums in the UK Constitution: Authority, Sovereignty and Democracy after Brexit – 213 Jaakko Husa – Locking in Constitutionality Control in Finland – 249 Delia Ferri – The Unorthodox Relationship between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Secondary Rights in the Court of Justice Case Law on Disability Discrimination – 275 2020 Volume 16 Issue 2
Case Notes Piotr Bogdanowicz and Maciej Taborowski – How to Save a Supreme Court in a Rule of Law Contributions by Crisis: the Polish Experience – 306 Daniel Thym, Tomáš Ľalík, Jaakko Husa, Michael Gordon, Delia Ferri, Piotr Bogdanowicz Tomáš Ľalík – The Slovak Constitutional Court on Unconstitutional Constitutional & Maciej Taborowski Amendment (PL. ÚS 21/2014) – 328 Subjects Finland: a peculiar method of constitutionality control and its historical background; United Kingdom: referendums and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a standard for constitutional review by the Bundesverfassungsgericht; Disability discrimination: Court of Justice case law between Charter, UN Convention and secondary rights 2020 Volume 16 187–343
Cambridge Core For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: cambridge.org/euconst 2020/2
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Athens, on 27 Sep 2021 at 17:55:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000188 Board of Editors Editorial Policy & Guidelines for Contributors
Leonard F.M. Besselink, co-editor-in-chief Mattias Wendel The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst) follows the classical approach of constitutionalism, University of Amsterdam Universität Leipzig to discuss EU law’s developments as well as comparative public law of European states, political and Monica Claes, co-editor-in-chief Aida Torres Pérez constitutional theory and history. The journal is a platform for scholarly discussion of European Maastricht University Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona constitutional events and evolution. It is open to contributions in this field from any country in the Jan-Herman Reestman, co-editor-in-chief François-Xavier Millet world and from any discipline. These contributions should satisfy as to substance, apart from the common University of Amsterdam Court of Justice of the European Union scholarly criteria, two specific conditions, to a) have a distinctly European relevance and b) include a W.T. Eijsbouts Thomas A.J.A. Vandamme reference to and discussion of legal aspects involved. University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Submitting an article, case note or book review John W. Sap Matteo Bonelli The editors of the European Constitutional Law Review are happy to receive contributions on relevant Open Universiteit and VU Amsterdam Maastricht University subjects at any time. Before submitting, authors should ensure that their contribution falls within the scope Thomas Beukers Bastian Michel, managing editor of EuConst as stated above. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague University of Amsterdam Jan Komárek Andrew Faughnan, language editor Manuscripts should be sent in Microsoft Word format (and not, specifically, in PDF format) to enable University of Copenhagen Amsterdam editing, anonymisation and comments. EuConst has an exclusive submission policy. Authors are required Gerhard van der Schyff to state clearly, when submitting, that their contribution is not under consideration elsewhere. University of Tilburg Articles and case notes can be sent by email to [email protected]. Authors of article contributions are asked to Board of Advisers aim for a length of no more than 10,000 words (including footnotes). Case notes should not exceed 5,000 Marta Cartabia Lucas Prakke words. Upon request, the editors will consider whether relaxation of these limits is justified. Vice-president of the Italian Constitutional Court Professor emeritus of comparative constitutional and Professor of constitutional law, Università law, University of Amsterdam Book reviews can be sent to our book review editors Nik de Boer, Vestert Borger and Paul Post at Milano-Bicocca Sacha Prechal [email protected]. Book reviews should not exceed 5,000 words. For more information on the Paul Craig Judge at the Court of Justice and Professor of EuConst book review section, see
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Athens, on 27 Sep 2021 at 17:55:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000188