AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
REPORT ON GROUND INVESTIGATION AT MAGNETIC PARK – SITE B, DESBOROUGH
REPORT STATUS SHEET
Client: Magnetic Park Partnership Report Title: Report on Ground Investigation at Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Report Number: AG2456-16-Z34 Report Status: Validated Issue 3 Date: October 2016 Detail of changes Clarification re Radon
Date Signed for and on behalf of Applied Geology Limited
Report F Hadley-Jones BSc (Hons) MSc FGS 24/10/2016 Author Project Geologist
Checked J L Allum BSc (Hons) MSc CGeol FGS 24/10/2016 Principal Engineer
Authorised J B Cartwright BEng (Hons) MSc FGS Managing Director 24/10/2016
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Objectives and Scope of Investigation ...... 1 1.2 Report Layout ...... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSALS ...... 2 2.1 Site Description...... 2 2.2 Site Proposals ...... 3 3.0 DESK STUDY INFORMATION ...... 3 4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ...... 5 4.1 Diagrammatical Illustration ...... 5 4.2 Sources ...... 5 4.3 Pathways ...... 5 4.4 Receptors ...... 6 4.5 Source/Pathway/Receptor Linkage and Assessed Risk ...... 6 5.0 GROUND INVESTIGATION WORKS ...... 7 5.1 Fieldwork ...... 7 5.2 Instrumentation and Monitoring ...... 7 5.3 Laboratory Testing ...... 8 6.0 GROUND CONDITIONS ...... 8 6.1 Strata Encountered - General ...... 8 6.2 Near Surface Disturbed/Reworked Material ...... 9 6.3 Made Ground ...... 9 6.4 Glacial Till ...... 10 6.5 Northampton Sand Formation ...... 11 6.6 Contamination ...... 11 6.7 Groundwater ...... 11 6.8 Soil Gas ...... 12 7.0 GEOENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ...... 12 7.1 Human Health Risk Assessment ...... 12 7.2 Controlled Waters Risk Assessment ...... 12 7.3 Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 13 8.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT ...... 13 8.1 General ...... 13 8.2 Foundation Design ...... 13 8.3 Floor Slab and Gas Protection ...... 14 8.4 Excavations ...... 14 8.5 Pavement Design ...... 14 8.6 Buried Concrete and Services ...... 15 8.7 Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 15
GENERAL NOTES LIST OF REFERENCES
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A DRAWINGS & FIGURES • Site Location Plan • Exploratory Hole Location Plan, Dwg No AG2456-16-01 Rev 2 • Conceptual Site Model, Dwg No AG2456-16-02 Rev 2 • Proposed Layout Drawings by Hampton Brook: Dwg No 3913/SK321 • SPT N value v depth (m bgl) • SPT N value v level (m AOD) • Undrained Shear Strength v depth
APPENDIX B DESK STUDY DATA APPENDIX C EXPLORATORY HOLE LOGS APPENDIX D FIELD MONITORING AND IN SITU TEST RESULTS APPENDIX E LABORATORY TEST RESULTS & DATA SHEETS APPENDIX F STANDARD FIELDWORK AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Objectives and Scope of Investigation
An area of land on the Magnetic Park industrial estate and known as ‘Site B’, located off Eagle Avenue, Desborough (the site) is being considered for redevelopment by Magnetic Park Partnership (the Client). The proposals for the site comprise the construction of a warehouse with associated loading bays, parking and landscaping areas.
Applied Geology Ltd was appointed by the Client to undertake a desk study/Phase I assessment and Phase II ground investigation in order to:
• assess the potential for hazardous substances or conditions to exist at the site that might warrant mitigation or remediation appropriate to the intended end use proposed by the Client. • establish geological conditions and geotechnical parameters to assist in the safe and economic engineering design of the proposed development. The terms of reference/brief for the works were mutually developed between Hampton Brook (property developers for the Client) and Applied Geology Ltd and are outlined in our proposal and estimate reference AG15-5005let001a dated 1st October 2015.
The scope of works undertaken by Applied Geology comprised:
• A site inspection and walkover survey • A review of the following desk study sources:
GroundSure – GeoInsight & EnviroInsight environmental databases. GroundSure – MapInsight historical maps. British Geological Survey (BGS) - published information & on-line borehole database. Environment Agency Web Site. Eastwood & Partners Consulting Engineers Site Investigation Report Ref: 27097, dated January 2006. Applied Geology (a division of Xplor Ltd) Phase II Ground Investigation Report Ref: AG291-06-C27, dated June 2006.
• Ground investigation together with sampling, monitoring and a programme of laboratory testing. • Assessment and reporting of the results of the works. Underground service plans for the site were obtained by Applied Geology on 26th April 2016. A topographic survey Drawing No. 8201a, by Staf Surv Land Surveyors, dated 14th October 2015, was provided by the Client. 1.2 Report Layout
This report presents a brief description of the site, the desk study data and the factual results of the intrusive investigations carried out. An interpretation of the ground conditions and a discussion/assessment of the findings is presented in the later report text sections. The main text of the report has been produced in a
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 2 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
concise format, including the use of data tables to summarise key information where possible. The report should be read in conjunction with the general procedures detailed in Appendix F and General Notes given at the end of the main text, which provide details of investigation techniques, assessment methodology and standards, health & safety and limitations and exceptions of the report. Drawings and factual data including exploratory hole records, laboratory testing results and desk study records are presented in the other Appendices.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSALS
2.1 Site Description
The site is located off Eagle Avenue, within the Magnetic Park industrial estate, approximately 1km north of the centre of Desborough. The Ordnance Survey grid reference for the centre of the site is 479964 284091 as shown on the Site Location Plan in Appendix A.
The site is approximately rectangular with dimensions of approximately 185m by 70m (1.3ha) and slopes gently to the south from 139.99m to 137.44m AOD as shown on the exploratory hole location plan, Ref: AG2456-16-01 Rev 2 in Appendix A, which is based on the topographical survey drawing.
The walkover and ground investigation for the site was undertaken concurrently with sites A, C and D, which form part of a larger scheme for the same Client. Site A was located to the south, Site C adjoining Site B to the north, and Site D was located to the northeast.
A site inspection/walkover was undertaken by Applied Geology on 5th May 2016. Access to the site was gained off Eagle Avenue, Desborough. At the time of the inspection, the site comprised an undeveloped partially grassed field. An approximately 2m high soil mound was located in the northeast of the site of dimensions 10m by 20m. To the southeast of the site, adjacent to the site boundary was an electricity substation. The substation was segregated from the site and surrounding area by a 2.1m high palisade fence.
The site was bound to the east by Eagle Avenue, beyond which was Great Bear Distribution Centre, to the south by Bear Way, beyond which was ‘Site A’ with associated balancing pond, to the west by Stoke Road, beyond which was a grassed field with associated balancing pond and to the north by Magnetic Park – Site C (adjoined to Site B).
A hedgerow was present adjacent to the western and southern boundaries of the site, with a number of semi-mature trees also present adjacent to the southwest of the site.
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 3
View looking northwest across the site. Soil mound in the northeast of the site, facing southwest.
Substation in the southeast of the site.
2.2 Site Proposals
The proposals for the site comprise the construction of a single-storey warehouse with associated open plan offices in the south and production area in the west, loading bays to the north of the site and parking to the south. Areas of possible landscaping are shown to the east and west of the warehouse building and to the southeast of the parking area. An area of possible future expansion is also shown to the west of the existing building. The proposals are shown on Drawing No’s 3913/SK321 (Rev J) dated 26th August 2015 and 3913/SK330 (Rev E) dated 17th November 2015, by Hampton Brook. Copies of these are presented in Appendix A.
3.0 DESK STUDY INFORMATION
The desk study findings are summarised below with the full Groundsure Report and selected Historical Ordnance Survey Maps included in Appendix B. The desk study information includes the area to the north known as Magnetic Park – Site C.
• 1886 – Site and surrounding area are agricultural fields. Site is bound to Site History the west by a road, orientated northeast – southwest. Midland railway line is located approximately 420m south. • 1899 – Old Quarry Water Works is located approximately 500m south. • 1924 – The Old Quarry to the south is no longer shown. The railway to the south is now ‘London, Midland and Scottish Railway’. • 1938 – One square shaped building is shown in the north of the site with two further buildings adjacent to the north on ‘Site C’. • 1950 – An ironstone quarry is present to the east of the site, located approximately 25m at its closest point. • 1969 – The ironstone quarry to the east is no longer shown. The road bounding the site to the west is now Stoke Road. An electricity substation is located approximately 20m west. Fibre Board Container Factory is located approximately 35m west, with associated tanks. A disused camp site is located approximately 170m northwest.
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 4 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
• 1991 – The disused camp site is now occupied by several rectangular buildings. • 2005 – Eastwood & Partners Site Investigation Report indicates the presence of farm buildings in the north of the site. • 2010 - The substation to the west is no longer shown. The buildings and factory to the northwest of the site form Millbuck Industrial Estate. Industrial development has taken place to the east of the site. • 2014 - Further development has taken place to the east including an access road, which now bounds the east of the site. • No further significant changes to present day. • Published BGS Map indicates that the site is underlain by Glacial Till Anticipated deposits. Solid geology of the Northampton Sand Formation and the Geology and Whitby Mudstone Formation (formerly the Upper Lias Clay) is anticipated Ground beneath. Conditions • Previous ground investigations were undertaken on the site by Eastwood & Partners in November 2005 and by Applied Geology in May 2006. The ground conditions encountered on the site generally comprised a relatively thin layer of Topsoil/Made Ground, overlying Glacial Till comprising, firm becoming very stiff with depth, slightly sandy slightly gravelly clay to a depth of between 1.8m and 4.9m bgl. The Northampton Sand Formation was encountered below the Glacial Till from a depth of between 1.8m and 4.9m, proven to a depth of 5.8m (base of the holes) and comprised orange/brown slightly silty gravelly sand and very weak sandstone, with the gravel comprising fine to coarse angular ironstone and sandstone. Three trial pits undertaken to the southeast of the site boundary (specifically to the southeast of a former hedge line shown on Eastwood & Partners Exploratory Hole Location Plan, re 27097/FIGI) recorded fill material, comprising stiff grey-brown gravelly clay and orange-brown gravelly sand, with the gravel comprising chalk, flint, limestone and sandstone. From this, it was inferred that the highwall/ western extent of the ironstone quarry, encroached marginally on to the site in the southeast though the proposed building is not affected by the area of deeper fill. Relevant logs from these ground investigations are presented in Appendix B with the approximate locations included on the exploratory hole location plan in Appendix A. Applied Geology recorded Made Ground up to 8.0m bgl to the east of the site in the backfilled quarry. • A ground investigation was undertaken to the south of the site on an area known as ‘Site A’, by Wardell Armstrong in February 2009. This site was previously part of the ironstone quarry and as a result, the ground conditions comprised deeper Made Ground. The Made Ground was encountered to a depth of between 1.5m and 9.8m bgl and comprised firm gravelly clay with occasional lenses of gravelly sand, the gravel comprising chalk, chert, ironstone and mudstone. The natural strata comprised Glacial Till to between 3.7m and 4.5m bgl, over the Northampton Sand Formation to between 8.3m and 13.5m bgl, over the Upper Lias Clay, which comprised stiff to very stiff dark grey slightly gravelly silty clay. • Site is in a radon affected area, with between 5% and 10% of homes above the Action Level. Basic radon protection measures are therefore considered necessary for new properties. • The GroundSure report indicates the ironstone quarry from the 1950’s to Mining/Quarrying be 185m to the southeast. The British Steel mining plans and exploratory hole location plan within the Eastwood & Partners report and presented in part in Appendix B, show the boundary of the quarry to encroach onto the site in the southeast by ~5m. The approximate location of the former hedge line at the western boundary of the former quarry is shown on Applied Geology Drawing No. AG2456-16-01 Rev 1 in Appendix A. • A Johnson Poole and Bloomer identified Mining area is located within 1000m of the site. • Site not in area associated with natural cavity formation. • No surface watercourses within 500m of the site. The River Isle is located Hydrology 1.9km south. One unnamed surface water feature within 250m of the site, located 37m south. Two further surface water features, ‘issues’ are
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 5
located 0.7km north and flow east and north to River Nene (east) and welland (north). • No water quality data available. • There are no surface water abstractions within 500m of site. • There are two licensed discharge consents within 500m of the site, the closest being located 65m west, associated with sewage discharges. • The site is outside of any floodplain. • The Glacial Till underlying the site is a Secondary (undifferentiated) Hydrogeology Aquifer, The Northampton Sand Formation is a Secondary A Aquifer and the Whitby Mudstone Formation is Unproductive Strata. • No groundwater abstraction licenses within 2000m of the site. • Site is not within the Total Catchment Zone for potable water supply. • Likely groundwater flow direction is to the south, following the topography. • No landfills or licensed waste sites within 250m. The nearest landfill to the Other site is a historical landfill, located 470m south, associated with inert Environmental waste, for which the license was surrendered in August 1991. data • 18 current industrial land usages within 250m, the closest being an electricity substation adjacent to the site to the southeast. • No recorded petrol/fuel sites within 250m. • Two recorded pollution incidents within 250m, the closest being a Category 4 (No impact), 14m Northwest in December 2002. A Category 2 (significant impact to water) occurred 84m west, 84m west. • One environmentally sensitive ecological designation within 500m, associated with Ancient Replanted Woodland, 458m north.
4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
4.1 Diagrammatical Illustration
The Conceptual Model for the site, showing the main elements of the surface and subsurface conditions and including the potential contaminant sources, pathways and receptors identified from the desk study information is presented in Appendix A as Drawing No AG2456-16-02 Rev 2 The potential sources, pathways and receptors are defined in the following sections:
4.2 Sources
• Made Ground soils on site associated with the historical site development (mainly in respect of infilled quarry); • Spillages of fuels/oils on site from historic vehicle trafficking; • On-site ground gases associated with decomposition of organic material in Made Ground and deep Made Ground, used to backfill quarry (if present); • Sulphates in Made Ground or underlying natural strata; • Hydrocarbon spillages and tanks from industrial usage to the east and west of the site; • Off-site – gas resulting from deep Made Ground from backfilled quarry. • Radon – on site.
4.3 Pathways
• Human dermal contact; • Human ingestion via soil directly; • Human inhalation of dust or vapours; • Leaching and/or migration through permeable soils (granular Made Ground and/or Northampton Sand Formation); • Direct contact with buried concrete/water supply services.
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 6 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
4.4 Receptors
• End users, workers (Human Health); • Glacial Till – Secondary (undifferentiated) Aquifer, Northampton Sand Formation – Secondary A Aquifer (Controlled Waters); • Buried foundation/substructure concrete (Building Materials); • Water supply services (Building Materials).
4.5 Source/Pathway/Receptor Linkage and Assessed Risk
Source-pathway-receptor (SPR) linkages are tabulated below together with the qualitatively assessed risk. The risk to ground workers and construction workers is not included here due to the short-term exposure times that they will be subject to and the assumption that good hygiene practices will be adopted on site and the appropriate use of relevant PPE/RPE will be adhered to when exposed to potentially contaminated soils. Comments regarding contamination issues with respect to ground workers and construction workers are included in the health and safety section of the Standard Procedures included as Appendix F.
Source Pathway Receptor Risk*
Potential contaminants Inhalation, ingestion, End users Low within Made Ground or dermal contact. resulting from historical site usage. Migration and Leaching Glacial Till – Secondary Low (undifferentiated) Aquifer Northampton Sand Formation – Secondary A Aquifer Potential contaminants Migration and leaching Glacial Till – Secondary Low within Made Ground or under the site (undifferentiated) resulting from historical Aquifer off site usage. Northampton Sand Formation – Secondary A Aquifer Soil gas from Made Migration into buildings, End users Low Ground – both on site and service ducts etc. off site sources (methane, carbon dioxide) Radon gas Medium
Elevated sulphates in Direct contact, leaching Buried concrete Made Ground, Made ground or natural and contact with Glacial Till and soils groundwater Whitby Mudstone – Medium Northampton Sand - Low Hydrocarbon Direct contact Water supply services Low contaminants within soils
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 7
* Definition of Risk Categories Negligible - Contaminants that might have unacceptable impact on key receptors, are unlikely to be present, or, no pathway is envisaged. Low Risk: Contaminants may be present but are unlikely to be at levels to have unacceptable impact on key receptors, or pathways are likely to be minimal. Medium Risk: Contaminants are probably present and might have an unacceptable impact on key receptors. Pathways may also be present therefore remedial measures may be necessary to reduce the risks. High Risk – Contaminants probably or certainly present and pathways are probably also present. Therefore, contaminants are likely to have an unacceptable impact on key receptors and remedial measures are likely to be necessary to reduce the risks to acceptable levels.
5.0 GROUND INVESTIGATION WORKS
5.1 Fieldwork
The following scope of fieldwork was undertaken:
• 3 No 150mm diameter Cable Percussion boreholes (ref. BH1B to BH3B) to depths of between 3.68m and 4.79m below ground level (bgl); • 12 No Machine Excavated Trial Pits (ref. TP1B to TP12B) to depths of between 1.5m and 3.7m bgl; • 5 No TRL DCP tests (ref TRL1 to TRL5).
During drilling, ‘undisturbed’ thin walled 100mm diameter UT100 samples were taken at regular intervals in the cohesive soils. The borehole and trial pit records are included in Appendix C along with the SPT calibration certificate.
Five TRL DCP (TRL1 to TRL5) tests were conducted to depths of between 845 and 900mm bgl in the locations of proposed parking and loading bays. The results of these tests are presented in Appendix D.
The locations of the exploratory holes were selected and set out on site by Applied Geology Limited and these were constrained by the presence of underground supply services along the eastern edge of the site. The sampling strategy for the exploratory hole locations was to provide best overall coverage by filling gaps from the previous ground investigations. The boreholes were located over the proposed building footprint for geotechnical purposes and the trial pits were located to obtain samples for subsequent contamination analysis and to define the edge of the quarry ‘high wall’.
The ground levels and positions of the exploratory holes were surveyed in by specialist contractor Midland Surveys Ltd and are presented on Drawing No. AG2456-16-01 Rev 2, in Appendix A.
5.2 Instrumentation and Monitoring
On completion of boring, 50mm diameter standpipes were installed in selected boreholes as follows, with further details included in the relevant borehole logs in Appendix C:
• BH1B, 1.0 to 4.0m bgl, in Glacial Till; • BH2B, 2.0 to 4.5m bgl in Glacial Till; • BH3B, 1.0 to 3.0m bgl in Glacial Till.
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 8 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
Washed silica gravel (6-10mm) was used as the filter medium and a 650 micron filter sock was wrapped around the slotted section of the standpipe. Each standpipe was fitted with a push-in bung and single gas tap and was finished with flush metal cover concreted in place.
Ground gas and groundwater monitoring visits were undertaken on 4 occasions between 26th May 2016 and 5th July 2016 including during 3 periods of low atmospheric pressure. Each monitoring well was monitored for concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, oxygen, flow rates and differential pressures and water level. The monitoring results are included in Appendix D.
5.3 Laboratory Testing
Geotechnical laboratory testing was undertaken on selected samples and comprised the following:
• 5 No natural moisture content tests; • 5 No Atterberg limit tests; • 2 No quick undrained triaxial tests; • 3 No one dimensional consolidation tests; • 6 No BRE SD1 greenfield with pyrite suite tests; • 1 No 4.5kg compaction test with CBRs at 3No. compaction points; • 1 No particle density test.
As no obvious evidence of contamination was encountered, a general suite of chemical testing was undertaken with eight samples analysed for the following suite of contaminants:
• Selected metals suite [arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, zinc, selenium]; • Speciated (16 US EPA) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH); • pH; • Soluble sulphate; • Organic matter; • Asbestos.
In addition, five samples were submitted for chromium hexavalent and trivalent and phenols (total) and four samples were submitted for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (Criteria Working Group) testing.
Laboratory test results are included in Appendix E.
6.0 GROUND CONDITIONS
6.1 Strata Encountered - General
Up to 1.5m of Made Ground (including disturbed/reworked material) has been encountered overlying Glacial Till, which in turn overlay the Northampton Sand Formation. The base of the Northampton Sand Formation was not proven and so the Whitby Mudstone Formation was not encountered. It is noted that there is an increase in the thickness of the Made Ground along the southeastern boundary of the site and parallel to the location of the former hedge line/assumed top of the
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 9
former quarry highwall. Full details of the strata encountered are given on the trial pit and borehole records presented in Appendix C. A generalised ground profile is presented below to summarise the information and includes information from the previous ground investigations.
Depth to Top of Thickness Stratum Strata (range) Comments (m bgl) (m) Encountered at all locations across Disturbed/Reworked GL 0.2 – 0.8 the site, with the exception of TP10B Ground and TP12B. Encountered in BH3B, TPs 3B, , 6B, Made Ground GL – 0.3 0.3 – 1.5 7B, to 12B Encountered in all locations with the Glacial Till 0.2 – 1.7 2.7 – 4.85 exception of TP12B and thickens towards the north
Encountered in the boreholes and in Northampton Sand trial pits TP18 (E&P 2005) and TPs 5, 1.8 – 4.9 > 1.1 Formation 6 and 17 (AG2006). Encountered shallower towards the south
6.2 Near Surface Disturbed/Reworked Material
Topsoil was recorded during the previous investigations in 2005 and 2006 to a depth of between 0.05m and 0.4m bgl. It is understood from the Client that the site was completely stripped of natural Topsoil as the surrounding area was developed in around 2008 as part of reprofiling of the wider site area. As part of the recent investigation an organic rich layer of disturbed/reworked soil was recorded from surface at 13 of the 15 exploratory holes, (not present within TP10B and TP12B) to depths of between 0.2m and 0.8m bgl. The strata comprised soft brown gravelly clay with rootlets particularly near surface, with the gravel comprising fine to coarse subangular to angular flint and subrounded chalk. Brick, concrete and tarmacadam fragments were recorded in TP3B, TP4B and TP8B and rubber fragments in TP5B.
6.3 Made Ground
With the exception of the southeast section of the site, (TP3B, TP10B, TP11B and BH3B) and locally around TP7B within the centre of the site, Made Ground was generally absent, other than a near surface layer of disturbed/partly organic rich Made Ground as described above.
TP7B and TP9B recorded Made Ground to a depth of 0.8m bgl, comprising orange/brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse sand, with the gravel comprising fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone.
Made Ground was also recorded in the southeast of the site (BH3B, TPs 3B, 6B, 10B, and 11B), to a depth of between 0.8m and 1.7m bgl and increased in thickness towards the southeast of the site. The Made Ground here generally comprised firm and stiff, orange-brown and brown gravelly clay, with gravel comprising fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone and chalk, with occasional wood fragments recorded in TP11B. A layer of orange-brown gravelly
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 10 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
clay was recorded below the clay in TP10B (0.25m in thickness) and TP11B (0.55m in thickness) and below the organic Made Ground in BH3B (0.5m in thickness), with the gravel comprising fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. This Made Ground is to the west of and approximately parallel to the assumed top of the quarry high wall defined on historic plans as being along the former hedge which crossed this part of the site. The increased depth of Made Ground in this area may indicate that the margins of the former quarry above the worked ironstone horizon extended slightly into this area.
A trial pit (TP12B) was undertaken on the stockpile, located in the northeast of the site and comprised Made Ground, comprising a grey sandy gravel over brown gravelly fine to coarse sand, with the gravel comprising fine to coarse sub-angular to angular limestone, quartzite and brick fragments.
A compaction study was undertaken on a composite sample from this stockpile (at 0.5m and 1.5m bgl) using a 2.5kg rammer. The results are summarised in the table below.
Parameter Result
Particle Density (Mg/m3) (measured) 2.61
Moisture Content (%) 13 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 13.1 Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3) 1.89 CBR at Optimum Moisture Content (%) 11
The results of particle size distribution tests undertaken on each sample within the composite sample, indicates the soils to comprise clayey/silty (14.6 – 16.1% passing the 63μm sieve), slightly sandy (26.4 – 28.5%), gravel (55.4 – 57.9%). The results indicate that the stockpiled soils to be characterized as class 2C/1A, stony cohesive material/well graded granular material, as defined by the Specification for Highway Works.
The results of an Atterberg limit test undertaken on the sample, indicated a corrected plasticity index of 9%, indicating the soils to be of low shrinkability, as defined by NHBC standards. Uncorrected plastic limit of 19%, liquid limit of 45% and moisture content of 13% were also recorded.
6.4 Glacial Till
Strata representing Glacial Till Deposits were recorded within all exploratory holes below the Made Ground (where encountered), from a depth of between 0.2m and 1.7m bgl, and the base proven to a depth of between 1.8m and 4.45m bgl. The strata generally thickened towards the north and comprised firm becoming stiff, occasionally closely fissured, brown and blue/grey becoming dark grey and dark brown with depth, gravelly clay, with the gravel comprising fine to coarse subrounded chalk, subangular to angular flint and occasional limestone. Occasional sandstone cobbles were recorded in TP19 (E&P 2005) from 1.0m to 3.0m bgl. Occasional fine to medium sand sized selenite crystals were encountered throughout. Sand laminations were encountered within in the Till in TP3 from 2.9m to 3.1m (base of the hole) and in TP4 from 1.8m to 2.0m.
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 11
Six Atterberg limit tests have been carried out on samples of the Glacial Till during the current phase of works and three during Eastwood and Partners investigation in 2005. The results have indicated corrected plasticity indices between of 18% and 44% (but generally between 18% and 29%) indicating these soils to be of low to medium shrinkability, with one sample tested indicating high shrinkability from TP19 (E&P 2005) as defined by NHBC Standards. Uncorrected plastic limits of between 19% and 29%, liquid limits of between 38% and 73% and natural moisture contents of between 13% and 36% were also recorded. The results indicate the clays to be of generally of low to medium plasticity and have consistency index values of between 0.84 and 1.17, suggesting stiff to very stiff soils, which is consistent with the visual assessment.
Uncorrected SPT ‘N’ values of between N=14 and N=38 were recorded in the Glacial Till, suggesting undrained shear strengths of between approximately 70 and 2 200kN/m , that is medium to very high strength based on an f1 of 5.2 (average corrected plasticity index of 21%). The SPT ‘N’ value vs depth plot shows an increase in strength with depth. Hand shear vane test results of between 70 and >130kN/m2 were recorded in the Glacial Till, together with hand penetrometer test results of between 85 and 375kN/m2 (high to very high strength), which generally increased with depth. The laboratory tests carried out during the current ground investigation and the AG 2006 ground investigation, on ‘undisturbed samples’ recorded undrained shear strengths of 132kN/m2 to 260kN/m2 (high to very high strength) in the 1.2m to 3.2m bgl depth range.
The results of the oedometer testing, indicate mv values of between 0.05 and 2 0.2m /MN (low to medium compressibility) for the po’ to po’+100 pressure range. 2 These are comparable to mv values of between 0.05 and 0.13m /MN based on the relationship between SPT ‘N’ value and plasticity index.
6.5 Northampton Sand Formation
Strata representing the Northampton Sand Formation were recorded below the Glacial Till from a depth of between 1.8m and 4.9m bgl to between 2.9m and 5.8m bgl (the base of the holes). The strata comprised extremely weak orange/brown ironstone, recovered as fine to coarse subangular to angular sandy gravel, and had weathered to a very dense yellow/brown gravelly fine to coarse sand, with the gravel comprising ironstone and sandstone.
Uncorrected SPT N values of between N=50 and N>250 (extrapolated from 50 blows) were recorded in the Northampton Sand Formation, indicating very dense soil to very weak rock (after Stroud 1989).
6.6 Contamination
No visual or olfactory evidence of contamination was identified within the exploratory holes.
6.7 Groundwater
Groundwater was not recorded during the excavation or drilling of any of the exploratory holes. During the subsequent monitoring visits groundwater was only encountered in BH1B. The standpipes in BH2B and BH3B remained dry. The
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 12 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
groundwater in BH1B gradually decreased over the monitoring period from a depth of 0.44m bgl (26th May 2016) to a depth of 2.1m bgl (5th July 2016), suggesting that the groundwater level had not reached equilibrium during the monitoring period.
6.8 Soil Gas
Four phases of ground gas monitoring have been undertaken as part of this investigation, the results of which are included in Appendix C. Methane concentrations of less than 0.1% by volume were recorded. Carbon dioxide concentrations of between less than 0.1% and 0.3% (by volume) were recorded along with ‘near normal’ oxygen concentrations of between 20.8% and 21.1%. Flow readings were taken over a three minute period, reporting average flow rates of less than 0.1% in all boreholes on three out of the four visits and a maximum average flow rate of 1.2l/hour in BH3B on only one occasion, which corresponded with the monitoring visit undertaken with the lowest atmospheric pressure.
Based on the worst case average gas flow and the peak methane and peak carbon dioxide readings, gas screening values have been calculated in accordance with CIRIA C665 for methane of 0.0012l/hr and for carbon dioxide of 0.0036l/hr.
7.0 GEOENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
7.1 Human Health Risk Assessment
The results of the chemical testing on soils have been assessed as described in Appendix F, with specific details as follows:
• Proposed end-use – offices/warehouse; • Screening criteria – commercial/industrial, assuming 1% SOM; • Assuming a single dataset based on the size of the site, the site’s history, current land-use and the proposed redevelopment.
A spreadsheet summarising the laboratory results and relevant screening values for each dataset are presented in Appendix E. From the table it can be seen that none of the results of the testing for the proposed development exceed the relevant screening value. PAHs were predominantly below the laboratory detection limits.
The results of the TPH testing have indicated all concentrations below the laboratory detection limits.
The Asbestos screening tests did not detect the presence of any Asbestos fibres.
Based on the above findings and assessment, it is considered that the site presents a negligible risk to human health.
7.2 Controlled Waters Risk Assessment
Limited depths of Made Ground were encountered during the ground investigation and no obvious sources were identified within the desk study or during the fieldwork. The Glacial Till Deposits (Secondary Undifferentiated Aquifer) were encountered beneath. These cohesive soils will also limit vertical migration. The testing on soils has found no elevated concentrations of contaminants and as a
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 13
result, there is considered to be no source or pathway, and hence, there is no pollutant linkage.
Based on the context of the site and the proposed redevelopment, there is considered to be a negligible risk to Controlled Waters.
7.3 Conclusions and Recommendations
The above risk assessments have established a negligible risk to human health and controlled water receptors. It is therefore considered that further assessment or remedial actions are not warranted for this redevelopment.
Issues with respect to ground gas and potential effects of contaminants on buried concrete and water supply pipework are included in Section 8.0.
8.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
8.1 General
The proposals for the site comprise construction of a single-storey warehouse with associated open plan offices in the south and production area in the west, loading bays to the north of the site and parking to the south. No proposed loads were available at the time of reporting.
The investigations have identified Made Ground (up to 1.7m in thickness thickening towards the southeast) over firm becoming stiff gravelly clays (Glacial Till Deposits). The upper parts of the Made Ground beneath a surface cover of vegetation in places were noted to be rich in organic material in places near surface and may represent near surface soils disturbed during previous earthworks with some organic material developed due to vegetation over subsequent years. As a result, some of this material may be unsuitable for re-use in construction or as a formation for pavement construction, subject to visual inspection of organic content and possible further testing. The Northampton Sand Formation was encountered in the Cable Percussion boreholes of the current investigation from a depth of between 3.0m and 4.45m bgl and comprised an extremely weak orange/brown Ironstone, which had weathered to a gravelly sand in the upper horizons. Groundwater was encountered during the monitoring of BH1B from a depth of 0.44m bgl (1st visit), falling to 2.1m bgl (4th visit), however it is likely that the groundwater level in this borehole had not reached equilibrium during the monitoring period.
8.2 Foundation Design
It is considered that the Glacial Till Deposits underlying the site are suitable to support conventional strip/trench fill or pad foundations. These must be placed below any Made Ground or disturbed ground encountered to a maximum depth of 1.7m bgl in the southeast of the site. The maximum depth of the Made Ground over the proposed building footprint was 1.2m bgl, in the southeast of the building.
A minimum founding depth of 1.0m will apply to the site to allow for seasonal effects. Strip/trench fill (up to 1m wide) and pad foundations (up to 2m x 2m) competently designed to the above requirements may adopt safe net design bearing pressures up to 160kN/m2. This is based on a minimum shear strength of
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 14 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
70kN/m2 using traditional methods of bearing capacity calculations e.g. as set out in Tomlinson 7th Edition and a factor of safety of 3 against bearing capacity failure.
Deeper Made Ground was encountered in the southeast of the proposed building. Foundations here will require deepening to circa 1.2m bgl and founded into the underlying Glacial Till Deposits.
Deepening of foundations along the west of the building footprint may be required with respect to the semi-mature trees and hedgerow present along the western site boundary.
Whilst it does not appear that the proposed building location is underlain by the highwall of the former quarry, the exact location across the whole length of the structure is not known. If conditions, significantly at variance to those described herein are encountered, specialist geotechnical advice should be sought to make appropriate assessment and recommendations. It is recommended that an Engineer inspects the formation excavations as the fill from the backfilled quarry to the south and natural ground are very similar.
8.3 Floor Slab and Gas Protection
The existing Made Ground encountered on this site, is not suitable to adopt a ground bearing floor slab in its current state. If a ground bearing floor slab is desired however, the Made Ground should be excavated and re-compacted to an engineering specification. In order for the engineering specification to be formed, earthworks testing will be required on the Made Ground. Otherwise, a suspended floor slab is would need to be used.
Based on the conceptual model, the ground conditions encountered and the calculated GSVs, the site can be characterised as Situation 1 (CIRIA C665), therefore, no ground gas protection measures are considered necessary. However gas protection measures are required for protection against ingress of radon gas, especially in areas of offices etc.
8.4 Excavations
Excavations up to 1.2m deep, (potentially locally deeper if deeper areas of quarry infill are encountered) are envisaged for the foundation excavations and service trenches. At these depths excavations are expected to be in a combination of granular Made Ground and cohesive Glacial Till. These materials are likely to be stable in the short term and so trench support may not be required. Significant groundwater ingress is not expected, although it is recommended that some provision for obtaining sump pumping equipment is made to control any minor seepage and run off in wet weather conditions.
8.5 Pavement Design
In situ CBR testing carried out across the site has indicated in situ CBR values of between 2% and 8%, in the Made Ground. Due to the inherent variability of this strata, an equilibrium CBR value of 2% is recommended, however, this may be improved following removal of any soft/deleterious material, proof rolling and re- testing.
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Page 15
In situ CBR values of between 6% and >100%, but generally between 6% and 18% were recorded in the Glacial Till. With reference to IAN73/06 Revision 1 (2009) the plasticity index values and in situ CBR test results, a long term equilibrium CBR value of between 3% and 5% is recommended for the gravelly clay of the Glacial Till Deposits.
Based on the plasticity indices, the Glacial Till Deposits can be regarded as non- frost susceptible. Based on the visual descriptions, the Made Ground and Quarry Fill may be frost-susceptible and therefore, should not be placed within 450mm of road surface construction.
8.6 Buried Concrete and Services
The results of the testing in the soils on site indicate characteristic values as following: • water soluble sulphate: 1.8g/l (Glacial Till), 0.51g/l (Northampton Sand Formation); • total potential sulphate: 0.33% (Glacial Till), 0.24% (Northampton Sand Formation); • pH: 7.9 (Glacial Till), 7.9 (Northampton Sand Formation).
The results of the sulphate tests carried out have identified the Design Sulphate Class for the Glacial Till to be DS-3 with the Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC) being AC-2s as defined by the BRE Special Digest 1, Concrete Aggressive Ground, 2005 for a brownfield site and static groundwater regime. The highest value coincides with the presence of selenite noted in the Glacial Till. The results of a sulphate test undertaken on a sample of the Northampton Sand Formation has indicated a Design Sulphate Class of DS-2 and ACEC AC-1s Further reference should be made to BRE Special Digest 1 for requirements in respect of types of cement and aggregate to be used and variations in type of concrete construction.
8.7 Conclusions and Recommendations
The cohesive Glacial Till present beneath the site are considered suitable for the use of conventional strip and pad foundations designed to an allowable bearing pressure of up to 160kN/m2. Foundations should be placed at a minimum depth of 1.0m bgl to allow for seasonal effects, however foundations will require deepening where deeper Made Ground was encountered in the southeast of the site to circa 1.2m bgl. Made Ground thickness could be greater in other areas and inspection of foundation formations is recommended prior to placement of concrete to ensure foundations are placed in appropriate strata.
A ground bearing floor slab may be adopted if the Made Ground is excavated and the slab placed on re-engineered fill. Protection measures against radon gas are considered necessary.
Sulphate resisting concrete appropriate to DS-3 and AC-2s conditions is likely to be required.
AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3 APPLiED GEOLOGY
Page 16 Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough
Applied Geology Limited Unit 23 Abbey Park Stareton Kenilworth Warwickshire CV8 2LY
Tel: 02476 511822
APPLiED GEOLOGY AG2456-16-Z34-Issue 3
GENERAL NOTES
A) The assessment made in this report is based on the site terrain and ground conditions revealed by the various field investigations undertaken and also any other relevant data for the site including previous site investigation reports (if available) and desk study data. There may be special conditions appertaining to the site, however, which have not been revealed by the investigation and which have not, therefore, been taken into account in the report. The assessment may be subject to amendment in the light of additional information becoming available. It must be recognised that many of the Environmental Searches obtained during the course of the desk study are often lengthy. Applied Geology have, where appropriate and in the interests of simplicity, only reproduced the summary of the searches within the report. A full copy of all the search data is held at the Applied Geology office and is available for inspection if required.
B) The services provided are defined within our proposal and are carried out in line with the terms of appointment between Applied Geology and the Client.
C) Where any data supplied by the Client or other external source, including that from previous site investigations, has been used it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by Applied Geology for inaccuracies within this data.
D) Whilst the report may express an opinion on possible configurations of strata between or beyond the exploratory locations, or on the possible presence of features based on either visual, verbal or published evidence this is for guidance only and no liability can be accepted for the accuracy.
E) Comments on groundwater (and landfill gas) conditions are based on observations made during the course of the present and past investigations or with reference to published data unless otherwise stated. It should be noted, however, that groundwater (and landfill gas) levels vary due to seasonal (or atmospheric conditions) or other effects.
F) The copyright of this report and other plans (and documents prepared by Applied Geology) is owned by Applied Geology and no such report, plan or document may be reproduced, published or adapted without the written consent of Applied Geology. Complete copies of the report may, however, be made and distributed by the Client as an expedient in dealing with matters related to its submission.
G) This report is prepared and written in the context of the proposals stated in the introduction to the report and should not be used in a differing context. Furthermore, new information, improved practices and legislation may necessitate an alteration to the report in whole or in part after its submission. Therefore with any change in circumstances or after the expiry of one year from the date of the report, the report should be referred to Applied Geology for re-assessment and if necessary, re- appraisal.
H) The survey was conducted and this report was prepared for the sole internal use and reliance of the Client. This report shall not be relied upon or transferred to any other parties without the express written authorisation of Applied Geology. If an unauthorised third party comes into possession of this report they rely on it at their peril and Applied Geology owes them no duty of care and skill.
I) Ground conditions should be monitored during the construction of the works and the recommendations of the report re- evaluated in the light of this data by the supervising geotechnical or geo-environmental engineers.
J) Unless specifically stated, the investigation has not taken into account the possible effects of mineral extraction.
K) The works performed are not a comprehensive site characterisation and should not be construed as being such.
L) The findings of the geo-environmental risk assessment are based on information obtained from a variety of sources which Applied Geology believe to be correct. Applied Geology cannot and does not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of the information it has relied upon.
M) The report represents the findings and opinions of experienced geo-environmental consultants. Applied Geology does not provide legal advice and the advice of lawyers may be required.
N) Conditions at the site are subject to change from the time of the site inspection.
O) It is possible that researches carried out by Applied Geology, whilst fully appropriate for a phase 1 desk study, failed to indicate the existence of important information sources. Assuming such indicators actually exist, their information could not have been considered in the formulation of Applied Geology findings and opinions.
P) The economic viability of the proposals referred to in the report, or of the solutions put forward to any problems encountered, depends on very many factors in addition to geotechnical considerations and hence its evaluation is outside the scope of this report.
Q) Applied Geology operates as a Consultancy and does not operate it's own laboratory for soil testing, this work being sub contracted to known and respected, generally UKAS accredited, laboratories. Applied Geology can therefore not be held responsible for the testing carried out.
APPLIED GEOLOGY SHORT OR LETTER REPORT NOTES (Feb 2014) LIST OF REFERENCES COMMONLY USED BY APPLIED GEOLOGY IN REPORTS
SECTION/TITLE AUTHOR/PUBLICATION
LABORATORY TESTING
BS 1377:1990 Method of Tests for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes BSI
SITE WORK
Guidelines for Combined Geoenvironmental and Geotechnical Investigations. Issue 2. March 2006 AGS BS 5930:1999 + A2 (2010). Code of Practice for Site Investigation. BSI BS 10175:2011 Code of Practice for the Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites BSI
FOUNDATION DESIGN
BRE Special Digest 1: 2005 Third Edition. Concrete in Aggressive Ground BRE NHBC Standards, Chapter 4.2: Building Near Trees. 2011 National House Building Council Foundations in Chalk (CIRIA Project Report 11). 1993 CIRIA Engineering in Chalk (C574). 2002 CIRIA Engineering in Mercia Mudstone (C570). 2001 CIRIA
SOIL GAS
Radon: Guidance on Protective Measures for New Buildings. 2007 Ed. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and BRE Indicative Atlas of Radon in Scotland (HPA – CRCE-023). 2011 HPA Code of Practice for the Characterisation and Remediation from Ground Gas in Affected Developments. BSI BS8485:2007 Guidance on Evaluation of Development Proposals on Sites Where Methane and Carbon Dioxide are NHBC & RSK Group Present (C665). 4th Ed, 2007
GROUNDWATER
BRE Digest 365: Soakaway Design. 2003 BRE
CONTAMINATION ASPECTS (Soil & Groundwater)
Cover Systems for Land Regeneration. Thickness of Cover Systems for Contaminated Land. 2004. BR465 AGS/BRE The LQM/CIEH Suitable 4 Use Levels (S4UL) for Human Health Risk Assessment, 2015. S4UL3159. Chartered Institute of Environmental Health. Land Quality Management. Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment. 2009 Chartered Institute of Environmental Health. Land Quality Management. Model Procedures for the Management of Contaminated Land. Contaminated Land Report 11 September DEFRA / Environment Agency 2004 The UK Approach for Evaluating Human health Risks from Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soils. February Environment Agency 2005. Remedial Targets Methodology. Hydrogeological Risk Assessment for Land Contamination. 2006. Environment Agency An ecological risk assessment framework for contaminants in soil. Science Report SC070009/SR1 Environment Agency September 2008 Guidance on desk studies and conceptual site models in ecological risk assessment. Science Report Environment Agency SC070009/SR2a October 2008 Guidance on the use of soil screening values in ecological risk assessment. Science Report Environment Agency SC070009/SR2b October 2008 Guidance on the use of bioassays in ecological risk assessment. Science Report SC070009/SR2c October Environment Agency 2008 Guidance on the use of ecological surveys in ecological risk assessment. Science Report SC070009/SR2c Environment Agency October 2008 Guidance on the attribution of cave and effect in geological risk assessment. Science Report Environment Agency SC070009/SR2e October 2008 Planning Policy Statement 23: Planning and Pollution Control. 2004. HMSO Method for Deriving Site Specific Human Health Criteria for Contaminants in Soil. Report no. LQ01. April Scotland & Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental 2010 Research. Land Quality Management Ltd. Sampling Strategies for Contaminated Land. Contaminated Land Research Report no.4. 1994 DoE NHBC Standards, Chapter 4.1: Land Quality – Managing Ground Conditions. 2011 National House Building Council ATRISKsoil Soil Screening Values Atkins CLEA Software (Version 1.06) Environment Agency The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations. 2011 DWI Prioritisation & Categorisation Procedure For Sites Which May Be Contaminated (CLR Report No6) Department of the Environment, Contaminated Land Research Report Code of Practice for the Investigation & Mitigation of Possible Petroleum-Based Land Contamination. 1993 The Institute of Petroleum Piling & Penetrative Ground Improvement Methods on Land Affected by Contamination: Guidance on Environment Agency Pollution Prevention. 2001
V:\Standard Forms\Project References AG Aug 15.doc
DISPOSAL OF SOIL
The Waste Management Licensing Regulations Waste Management the Duty of Care. A Code of Practice Department of the Environment UK Soil Framework Directive. Annex II - 1999/31/EC and Annex III - 91/689/EEC
BURIED SERVICES
Guidance for the Selection of Water Supply Pipes to be Used in Brownfield Sites. (10/WM/03/21). 2010 UK Water Industries Research Effects of Organic Chemicals in Contaminated Land on Buried Services (DWQ 9025, Report 2982(P)). Department of the Environment 1992 The Impact of Contaminated Land on Buried Electrical Cables (CONTAM-2.5AM). 1998 ERA Technology
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Interim Advice Note 73/06 Rev 1, 2009. Design Guidance for Road Pavement Foundations (Draft HD25) Highways Agency
HEALTH & SAFETY ASPECTS
A Guide for Safe Working on Contaminated Sites (Report 132) CIRIA Protection of Workers and the General Public During the Development of Contaminated Land (HSG66) Health & Safety Executive Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2006 (CDM) Health & Safety Executive Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 Health & Safety Executive Workplace Exposure Limits. EH40/2005 Health & Safety Executive Trenching Practice. Guidance on Groundwater Control (Report 97) CIRIA Control of Groundwater for Temporary Works (Report 113) CIRIA
V:\Standard Forms\Project References AG Aug 15.doc APPENDIX A Site Location Plan
Site: Magnetic Park – Site B, Desborough Title: Taken from Ordnance Survey (1:50,000) Map 141, Kettering, Corby and surrounding area NGR: 479964 284091 Project No: AG2456-16
Site
Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright* LICENCE No: 100055022
02 METRES 10
Scale: 1:200
138.38 Chain link fence ht 2.1m 138.55 138.73 138.5 138.89 138.14 BT 138.95 138.27 Tarmac 139.03
138.12 139.98 138.48 140.05 138.36 138.58 140.0
138.39 138.68 139.94 139.92 140.08 138.29 138.59 Tarmac 139.43 Chain link fence ht 2.1m
SV Grass
138.08 138.92 WO 138.77 SV 139.5 139.09 BT 140.05 138.18 Grass 140.22
Grass 139.0 139.01 Grass 138.52 140.15 Concrete Grass 140.39 138.65 LC 139.68 139.85 LC 139.50 BT 138.5 BT 139.33 STNG G 139.76 138.01 139.56 138.35 139.03 139.45 138.11 139.21 140.06 140.36
138.25 Hedge ht 1.5m
138.73 138.91 140.5 139.0 139.93 140.33 140.59 139.81 140.06 138.64 140.0 136.43 139.5 140.56
137.26 138.40 138.5 139.68 140.28 140.88
138.31 139.47 STOKE ROAD G 140.56 140.84 141.13
137.0 138.21 139.11 Long grass 139.82 141.0 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 139.71
136.98 139.45 139.98 140.11 140.84 141.10 137.5 138.03 CL:140.01 137.10 LC 137.91 139.20 MH
Long grass 138.84 138.0 139.80 139.94 140.10 138.95 139.56 140.24 140.37 141.08 137.78 140.0 BT Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 136.87 139.30 140.98 138.67 139.07 140.47 140.60 BEG 138.24 138.43 139.0 RS 139.5 140.5 G 138.40 138.77 140.74 140.84
136.96 137.42 137.5 Tarmac 137.0 138.02 138.53 140.0 140.93 141.10 136.74 137.28 138.5 139.55 139.77 140.10 139.92 141.19 137.17 138.28 139.35 137.11 137.07 137.85 139.16 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 139.5 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m SITE DATA - BASE BUILD 137.04 136.81 136.74 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 137.07 137.03 136.87 136.85 137.02 137.60 137.97 138.84 140.93 136.93 G 139.0 141.0 136.98 137.55 138.0 139.65 LC 136.57 136.90 138.64 139.15 139.23 137.10 136.86 139.10 141.04 137.03 137.66 138.5 138.44 138.84 140.17 141.35 Tt 136.75 137.27 137.31 PLANNING APPLICATION AREAS
136.91 136.76 138.54 cars 137.0 137.03 RS 140.0 136.71 G
137.0 STOKE ROAD 136.96 137.44 138.27
136.63 138.29 136.69 137.10 137.5 136.92 137.02 136.59 BEG 136.96 136.68 136.98 G 138.27 Boll Illum CL:137.17 136.93 136.77 136.72 136.83 G G 136.57 137.00 137.23 WAREHOUSE (B8) 2,974.21m² (32,014ft²) 25
136.90 136.56 136.56 G 136.56 139.5 137.03 G
136.86 136.82 STNF 136.61 140.5
136.81 136.72 136.64 136.81 137.12 137.98 140.00 140.38 137.0 136.62 MH 136.76 140.35 136.69 G 139.04 PRODUCTION AREA (B2) 88.79m² (956ft²) 2 140.40 137.19 136.89 137.67 Tt 137.07 136.55136.63 136.56
Sign Elec 136.63 136.65 137.0 138.44 136.97 136.72 G 136.86 G 136.58 Boll Illum Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 139.40 140.18 G 136.74 2 STOREY OFFICE (B1) 713.36m² (7,679ft²) 24 Tt 137.04 136.91 136.56 137.64 51278 STOKE ROAD 136.70 LC
136.58 137.34 137.08 G 136.63 136.67 139.0 136.69 136.68 137.0 139.89
137.0 136.80 138.10
137.14 137.15 136.70 Sign 137.32 137.09 136.75
G=0.1mS=3m 137.5 TOTAL 3,776.36m² (40,649ft²) 51
136.99 136.91 136.81 137.0
137.0 G=0.1mS=3m 137.23 138.5 LC G=0.1m 137.20 137.05 137.0 S=3m 137.12 137.06 G=0.1m 140.38 G=0.1m S=3m S=3m 137.12 137.03 G=0.1m 137.17 RS S=3m 138.0 FUTURE EXPANSION (B8): 1289m² (13,874ft²) - 11 cars
137.28 136.92 137.89
137.20 Tt Tarmac 136.83 137.38 G=0.1m
137.18 S=3m Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 136.93 137.0 137.53 137.30 137.5
136.96 137.38 136.88 137.0 137.08 137.34
137.15 139.13
137.26 1.5m ht fence rail & Post 137.22 137.02 137.27 PHASE 1 SITE AREA: 2.846 ACRES
MH 137.23 137.49
137.29 137.15 CL:137.17 140.0
7 WAITING EXPANSION LAND SITE AREA: 0.454 ACRES 139.5 138.56 137.29 G
139.70 TOTAL SITE AREA: 3.3 Acres 137.5 137.45
137.5
137.40 140.24
137.34 137.47 138.04 137.39
140.00
Sign 137.69 gate 137.43
137.33 137.48
137.5 Tarmac 137.27 LC S=3m landscaped G=0.1m 140.44
137.93
137.56 area
137.61 137.49 Rough ground 140.5
139.13
Rough ground 137.54 140.51
137.71
140.0 141.02 138.0
138.68 Rough ground 137.42 139.61
SNP Rough ground 140.37 140.47 137.73
137.60 137.44
Rough ground 137.5 137.80 139.99 138.18 137.36 2 WAITING Tt 2M VERGE 139.85
137.77 137.5 138.06
landscaped 138.5 137.35
139.0 51 CARS 137.5
EXTENSION
11 CARS FOR FUTURE area CL:137.85
137.5 Boll Illum LC 139.5 G 137.69 MH S=6m 137.92
G=0.2m 137.79
137.49 140.0 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 137.55 137.57 137.68 139.16
139.71
137.86 138.59 140.36
138.0 138.0
137.74 139.96 139.88
137.51 139.88
RS 138.07 137.55 140.0
138.13 138.10
S=6m 140.5 140.0 140.03
137.84 138.0 G=0.2m 137.69 138.14
138.07 gate 138.20 138.26 141.32 141.0 138.13
CYCLES CYCLES 3 MOTOR 140.11
1.85m FOOTWAY Steel palisade fence ht 2.1m 140.5 141.5
141.0
140.39 138.19 141.5
141.79 141.68 138.02 140.12
8 CYCLES 139.94
137.92 VERGE 2 WAITING 140.67
137.86 137.79 138.0 140.21 Steel palisade fence ht 2.1m 138.0
S=6m 138.01 137.89
G=0.2m 138.24 141.85 141.5 141.0 140.5
138.04 recycling 140.5 138.28 141.09
Pumping Station 138.5 141.5
140.02 141.0 140.24 Post & rail fence ht 1.5m 140.5
137.97 lifting 137.82 138.0 140.04 140.29 7300 137.86 139.74 137.92 vehicle 140.18 139.46 gate
138.29 MH? 138.00 138.0 137.97 138.41 139.05 138.44 barrier 140.43
138.13 Blue line (Fit out item) 138.5 140.21
138.46
137.92 139.5 indicates 138.06 Concrete 138.24
138.5 138.75 137.88 138.14 139.0 138.04 139.99 137.98 fence
137.93 RS 138.05 138.38 138.43
138.52 140.0
Sub Station 138.43 138.5 138.28 BT Sign 138.68 138.91 Drawing issue: RS LC 3.0m CYCLEWAY Tt 138.50 137.94 137.99 138.13 139.52 139.12 139.42 139.64 139.79 SV WO 138.82 138.91 139.08 140.21 140.34
138.04 RS 138.60 138.71 138.79 138.861.7m VERGE138.95 139.96 140.18 140.66 140.80
Tarmac 3.0m CYCLEWAY 138.46 G 139.39 139.51 G 140.5 138.0 Tarmac 139.62 LC 138.42 139.30 139.65 G 138.27 G G G G Revisions: 138.10 CL:139.34MH 140.35 140.68 138.68 138.75 138.82 138.98 139.08 139.16 139.84 140.07 140.15 140.54 140.62 G 138.35 138.49 138.58 138.88 138.32 CL:139.22 G 137.98 139.61
Tt 138.34 138.27 EAGLE AVENUE 139.51 139.54 139.72 138.29 EAGLE AVENUE A. 28/08/15 Information added. MH 140.51 140.71 CL:138.36 139.89 140.09 140.30 MH CL:138.28 CL:138.32 MH 139.71 STND
138.13 138.25MH 138.19 Boll Illum 140.62 G BT 138.57 138.82 140.08 B. 14/09/15 Building poistion on site & expansion land revised. 138.09 G 137.98 SNP 138.44 138.48 138.61 138.72 138.82 138.95 139.06 139.18139.07 139.30 140.0 138.20 139.39 139.61 138.04 138.31 G 138.5 139.0 139.31 139.59 139.74 140.5 139.51 139.5 G EAGLE AVENUE 138.07 G G G G 138.22 G G C. 14/09/15 Offices revised to two storey. STNE 138.31 139.07 139.17 139.92 140.07 140.23 140.41 140.60 140.73 138.11 138.38 138.45 138.56 138.63 138.74 138.85 138.95 139.27 139.74
40m between junctions 139.41 139.53
138.19 140.18 140.33 140.52 140.71 140.84 D. 01/10/15 Layout revised. LC 138.86 138.96 139.18 139.27 139.38 140.02 138.23 138.75 139.06 138.50 138.56 138.67 LC LC LC 139.83 138.29 138.43 139.51 139.63 G Steel mesh fence ht 2.1m Tarmac Tarmac Tarmac 138.12 138.22 138.63 Steel mesh fence ht 2.1m E. 06/11/15 Internal Office Layout revised. GIA revised.
Tt 138.34 Tarmac
138.31 138.5 138.49
MH 140.45 140.69 140.90
CL:138.12 138.96 139.05 139.15 139.26 139.34 139.45 139.62 139.76 139.93 140.07 140.29 138.13 138.41 138.88 F. 16/11/15 Internal Office Layout revised. GIA & Topo base revised. 138.87
138.69
138.08 138.30 138.04 138.19 138.68 G. 11/12/15 Floor area legend and car park revised . Fencing and 138.14 Tarmac 138.55
138.47 Gates / barriers added. SNP
138.19 138.37 138.42 Steel mesh fence ht 2.1m H. 20/01/16 Layout revised. J. 25/01/16 Parking revised. 138.09 138.19
MH RS CL:138.16
138.25
LC 138.35 138.18 BEAR WAY 138.29 Project:
Tarmac 138.26 MAGNETIC PARK 138.14G
138.38
138.35 138.31 DESBOROUGH G 138.22
138.34
138.24
Title: SITE LAYOUT
Date: 26/08/15 Drg No. Rev: Scale: 1:500@A2 Drawn: JT 3913/SK321 J Checked: BF C Hampton Brook AG2456-16 Magnetic Park - Site B SPT 'N' Vs Level Plot (m AOD)
SPT N Value
138
137.5
137
136.5
136
135.5 Level (m AOD) 135
134.5
134
133.5
133 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Glacial Till (Applied Geology 2016) Northampton Sand Formation (Applied Geology 2016) AG2456-16 Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough SPT 'N' Vs Depth Plot (m bgl)
SPT N Value 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 bgl) (m Depth 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 Glacial Till (Applied Geology 2016) Northampton Sand Formation (Applied Geology 2016) Glacial Till (Eastwood and Partners 2005) Northampton Sand Formation (Eastwood and Partners 2005) Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough Shear Strength Vs Depth (m bgl)
Hand Shear Vane Test Results (kN/m2)
0 50 100 150 200 250 0
1
2 bgl) (m Depth
3
4
Possible Quarry Fill Reworked Glacial Till Glacial Till
AG2456-16 APPENDIX B CountyCounty Series 1:10,560 scale NationalNational Grid 1:10,000 scale
HistoricalHistoricalHistoricalHistorical MMMaMaaapppp PPPaPaaacccckkkk LegendLegendLegend
CountyCounty Series & National Grid
1:10,560 scale
InInformationformation present on these legenlegenddddssss iiisisss sssosooouuuurrrrcccceeeedddd from the same OrdOrdnnnnaaaannnncccceeee SSSuSuuurrrrvvvveeeeyyyy mmmamaaappppppiiiinnnngggg aaasasss ttththhheeee maps used in this product.
If you have a query regarding any of the maps ppprprrroooovvvviiiiddddeeeedddd ppplpllleeeeaaaasssseeee cccocooonnnnttttaaaacccctttt GGGrGrrroooouuuunnnnddddSSSSuuuurrrreeee’’’’ssss ttteteeecccchhhhnnnniiiiccccaaaallll helpline. We will eendeavourndeavour to answer any queries you may have.
Technical Helpline
Tel 08444159000
[email protected]@groundsure.com www.groundsure.comwww.groundsure.com
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1885 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1899-1901 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1924 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1938 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1950 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#Provisional N ! 1957-1958 W E $ 1:10,560 S % 1:10,560
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 1971-1972 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 1982 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 1992-1994 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#1:10,000 Raster N ! 2002 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 2010 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 2014 W E $ 1:10,000 S % 1:10,000
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy CountyCounty Series 1:1:2,5002,5002,5002,500 scalescalescalescale NationalNational Grid 1:1:2,5001:2,5002,5002,500 / 1:1,250 scalescalescalescale HHHiiisisssttttoooorrrriiiiccccaaaallll MMMaMaaapppp PPPaPaaacccckkkk LegendLegendLegend
CountyCounty SerCounty SeriesSeriesiesies
1:1,250 scale ~ County Series & National Grid
1:2,500 scalescalescale
InInformationformation present on these legenlegenddddssss iiisisss sssosooouuuurrrrcccceeeedddd from the same OrdOrdnnnnaaaannnncccceeee SSSuSuuurrrrvvvveeeeyyyy mmmamaaappppppiiiinnnngggg aaasasss ttththhheeee maps used in this product.
If you have a query regarding any of the maps provided within this map pack, please contact GroundSure’s technical helpline. We will eeenennnddddeeeeaaaavvvvoooouuuurrrr tttotooo aaanannnsssswwwweeeerrrr aaanannnyyyy qqququuueeeerrrriiiieeeessss yyyoyooouuuu mmmamaaayyyy hhhahaaavvvveeee....
Technical Helpline:
Tel 08444159000
[email protected]@groundsure.com www.groundsure.comwww.groundsure.com
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1886 W E $ 1:2,500 S % 1:2,500
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1900 W E $ 1:2,500 S % 1:2,500
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#County Series N ! 1926 W E $ 1:2,500 S % 1:2,500
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 1969 W E $ 1:2,500 S % 1:2,500
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy
Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshir e,NN14 2WB EMS_358742_481517 EMS-358742_481517 479941, 284412 !"#National Grid N ! 1991-1993 W E $ 1:2,500 S % 1:2,500
V01BR4EB C6 Q W01R3BDR0E X3D789@D 222Y801R3BDR0EY41`
QR55a7EB C6b 222YE`A5D7@EY41` DAaEDcE`A5D7@EY41` ( )0123 41560789@ A3B BA@ACADE 0789@D FGHI P0B3A34E QR0SE6 HGGGTIFGU defghippqprsphh V01BR4@713 BA@Eb 26 April 2016
t1 S7E2 `A5 aE8E3B 4a74u 9E0E vwxwy EmapSite Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518
Masdar House, Eversley, RG27 0RP Your Reference: EMS_358742_481518
Report Date 26 Apr 2016
Report Delivery Email - pdf Method:
Groundsure Geoinsight
Address: Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshire,NN14 2WB,
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Thank you for placing your order with Groundsure. Please find enclosed the Groundsure Geoinsight as requested.
If you would like further assistance regarding this report then please contact the emapsite customer services team on 0118 9736883 quoting the above report reference number.
Yours faithfully,
emapsite customer services team
Enc. Groundsure Geoinsight Groundsure Geoinsight
Address: Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshire,NN14 2WB,
Date: 26 Apr 2016
Reference: EMS-358742_481518
Client: EmapSite
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 16-Apr-2014 Grid Reference: 479929,284394 Site Size: 2.39ha Contents Page Overview of Findings...... 5 1 Geology...... 8 1.1 Artificial Ground Map...... 8 1 Geology...... 9 1.1 Artificial Ground...... 9 1.1.1Artificial/ Made Ground...... 9 1.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground...... 9 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map...... 10 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips...... 11 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology...... 11 1.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground...... 11 1.2.3 Landslip...... 11 1.2.4 Landslip Permeability...... 11 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map...... 12 1.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults...... 13 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology...... 13 1.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground...... 13 1.3.3 Faults...... 13 1.4 Radon Data...... 14 1.4.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 14 1.4.2 Radon Protection...... 14 2 Ground Workings Map...... 15 2 Ground Workings...... 16 2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 16 2.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 16 2.3 Current Ground Workings...... 16 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities Map...... 18 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities...... 19 3.1 Historical Mining...... 19 3.2 Coal Mining...... 19 3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer...... 19 3.4 Non-Coal Mining...... 20 3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities...... 20 3.6 Natural Cavities...... 20 3.7 Brine Extraction...... 20 3.8 Gypsum Extraction...... 20 3.9 Tin Mining...... 21 3.10 Clay Mining...... 21 4 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 22 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map...... 22 4.2 Landslides Map...... 23 4.3 Ground Dissolution Soluble Rocks Map...... 24 4.4 Compressible Deposits Map...... 25 4.5 Collapsible Deposits Map...... 26 4.6 Running Sand Map...... 27 4 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 28 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clays...... 28 4.2 Landslides...... 28 4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks...... 29
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 3 4.4 Compressible Deposits...... 29 4.5 Collapsible Deposits...... 30 4.6 Running Sands...... 30 5 Borehole Records Map...... 31 5 Borehole Records...... 32 6 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry...... 34 7 Railways and Tunnels Map...... 35 7 Railways and Tunnels...... 36 7.1 Tunnels ...... 36 7.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features ...... 36 7.3 Historical Railways...... 37 7.4 Active Railways...... 37 7.5 Railway Projects...... 37
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 EMS_358742_481518 4 Overview of Findings The Groundsure Geoinsight provides high quality geo-environmental information that allows geo- environmental professionals and their clients to make informed decisions and be forewarned of potential ground instability problems that may affect the ground investigation, foundation design and possibly remediation options that could lead to possible additional costs. The report is based on the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain, BGS Geosure data; BRITPITS database; Shallow Mining data and Borehole Records, Coal Authority data including brine extraction areas, PBA non-coal mining and natural cavities database, Johnson Poole and Bloomer mining data and Groundsure's unique database including historical surface ground and underground workings. For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded.
Section 1:Geology
1.1 Artificial Ground 1.1.1 Is there any Artificial Ground/ Made Ground present Yes beneath the study site?
1.1.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial No ground within the study site* boundary? 1.2 Superficial 1.2.1 Is there any Superficial Ground/Drift Geology present Yes Geology and beneath the study site? Landslips 1.2.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of Yes superficial geology within the study site boundary?
1.2.3 Are there any records of landslip within 500m of the study No site boundary?
1.2.4 Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips No within the study site boundary?
1.3 Bedrock, Solid 1.3.1 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the Geology & Faults study site* see the detailed findings section.
1.3.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock Yes within the study site boundary?
1.3.3 Are there any records of faults within 500m of the study No site boundary?
1.4 Radon data 1.4.1 Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the The property is in a Radon Affected Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of Area, as between 5 and 10% of homes are above the Action Level? properties are above the Action Level
1.4.2 Is the property in an area where Radon Protection Measures are required for new properties or extensions to Basic radon protective measures are existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building necessary Research Establishment?
Section 2:Ground Workings On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000
2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features from Small Scale Not Not 0 0 3 Mapping Searched Searched
2.2 Historical Underground Workings from Small Scale Mapping 0 0 0 0 0
2.3 Current Ground Workings 0 0 0 0 10
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 EMS_358742_481518 5 Section 3:Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000
3.1 Historical Mining 0 0 1 0 1
3.2 Coal Mining 0 0 0 0 0
3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer Mining Area 1 0 1 1 1
3.4 Non-Coal Mining 0 0 0 0 0
3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities 0 0 0 0 0
3.6 Natural Cavities 0 0 0 0 0
3.7 Brine Extraction 0 0 0 0 0
3.8 Gypsum Extraction 0 0 0 0 0
3.9 Tin Mining 0 0 0 0 0
3.10 Clay Mining 0 0 0 0 0
Section 4:Natural Ground Subsidence On-site
4.1 Shrink Swell Clay Low
4.2 Landslides Very Low
4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Negligible
4.4 Compressible Deposits Negligible
4.5 Collapsible Deposits Very Low
4.6 Running Sand Very Low
Section 5:Borehole Records On-site 0-50m 51-250
0 0 27 5 BGS Recorded Boreholes
Section 6:Estimated Background Soil Chemistry On-site 0-50m 51-250
7 6 9 6 Records of Background Soil Chemistry
Section 7:Railways and Tunnels On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500
0 0 0 Not Searched 7.1 Tunnels
0 0 2 Not Searched 7.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features
0 0 0 Not Searched 7.3 Historical Railways
0 0 0 Not Searched 7.4 Active Railways
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 6 Section 7:Railways and Tunnels On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500
0 0 0 0 7.5 Railway Projects
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 7 1 Geology 1.1 Artificial Ground Map
NW N NE
W E
S SW SE
Artificial Ground Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 8 1 Geology 1.1 Artificial Ground 1.1.1Artificial/ Made Ground
The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No:170
Are there any records of Artificial/Made Ground within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes
Distance ID Direction LEX Code Description Rock Description (m) 1 0.0 On Site WGR-OPEN WORKED GROUND (UNDIVIDED) VOID
2 459.0 S WGR-OPEN WORKED GROUND (UNDIVIDED) VOID
1.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground
Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial ground within the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 9 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map NW N NE
W E
S SW SE
Superficial Deposits and Landslips © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 10 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology
Are there any records of Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes
Distance ID Direction LEX Code Description Rock Description (m) 1 0.0 On Site TILMP TILL, MID PLEISTOCENE DIAMICTON
1.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground
Are there any records relating to permeability of superficial ground within the study site boundary? Yes
Distance Direction Flow Type Maximum Permeability Minimum Permeability (m) 0.0 On Site Mixed High Low 0.0 On Site Mixed High Low
1.2.3 Landslip
Are there any records of Landslip within 500m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found. This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Artificial / Made Ground, Superficial / Drift Geology and Landslips. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage.
1.2.4 Landslip Permeability
Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips within the study site** boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 11 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map NW N NE
W E
S SW SE
Bedrock and Faults Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 12 1.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No:170 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology
Records of Bedrock/ Solid Geology within 500m of the study site boundary:
Distance ID Direction LEX Code Description Rock Age (m) Grantham Formation - Sandstone, Siltstone And 1 0.0 On Site GRF-SDSM Aalenian Mudstone Northampton Sand Formation - Ironstone, 2 0.0 On Site NS-FEOOL Aalenian Ooidal 3 0.0 On Site WHM-MDST Whitby Mudstone Formation - Mudstone Toarcian Grantham Formation - Sandstone, Siltstone And 4 35.0 S GRF-SDSM Aalenian Mudstone
1.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground
Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock ground within the study site* boundary? Yes
Distance Direction Flow Type Maximum Permeability Minimum Permeability (m) 0.0 On Site Fracture Low Low 0.0 On Site Mixed Moderate Moderate 0.0 On Site Mixed Moderate Low 0.0 On Site Mixed Moderate Moderate 3.0 NW Fracture Low Low 35.0 S Mixed Moderate Low
1.3.3 Faults
Are there any records of Faults within 500m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found. The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale.
This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Bedrock/ Solid Geology and linear features such as Faults. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage.
* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 13 1.4 Radon Data 1.4.1 Radon Affected Areas
Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The property is in a Radon Affected Area, as between 5 and 10% of properties are above the Action Level
1.4.2 Radon Protection
Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? Basic radon protective measures are necessary
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 14 2 Ground Workings Map NW N NE
W E
S SW SE
Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 15 2 Ground Workings
2.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping
This dataset is based on Groundsure's unique Historical Land Use Database derived from 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical mapping.
Are there any Historical Surface Ground Working Features within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes
The following Historical Surface Ground Working Features are provided by Groundsure:
Distance ID Direction NGR Use Date (m) 480032 1A 185.0 SE Ironstone Quarry 1950 284035 479966 2 188.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 284022 480050 3A 189.0 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 284033
2.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping
This data is derived from the Groundsure unique Historical Land Use Database. It contains data derived from 1:10,000 and 1:10,560 historical Ordnance Survey Mapping and includes some natural topographical features (Shake Holes for example) as well as manmade features that may have implications for ground stability. Underground and mining features have been identified from surface features such as shafts. The distance that these extend underground is not shown.
Are there any Historical Underground Working Features within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
2.3 Current Ground Workings
This dataset is derived from the BGS BRITPITS database covering active; inactive mines; quarries; oil wells; gas wells and mineral wharves; and rail deposits throughout the British Isles.
Are there any BGS Current Ground Workings within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes
The following Current Ground Workings information is provided by British Geological Survey:
Distanc Commodity ID Direction NGR Pit Name Type of working Status e (m) Produced A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480243 563.0 SE Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283776 Opencast Coal Site
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 16 Distanc Commodity ID Direction NGR Pit Name Type of working Status e (m) Produced A surface mineral working. It may be Not 479837 581.0 S Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283630 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be 480500 6 659.0 SE Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased 283955 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480600 700.0 E Ironstone Desborough Quarries termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 284100 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 479753 725.0 S Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283493 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480497 790.0 SE Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283707 Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480840 Desborough, East Lodge 819.0 E Ironstone termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 284430 Pit Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480895 Desborough, West 872.0 E Ironstone termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Dormant shown 284785 Lodge Pit Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 479738 Desborough Brick 964.0 S Clay & Shale termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283254 Works Opencast Coal Site A surface mineral working. It may be Not 480692 976.0 SE Ironstone Desborough termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 283656 Opencast Coal Site
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 17 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Mining, Extraction and © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Natural Cavities Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 18 3 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities 3.1 Historical Mining
This dataset is derived from Groundsure unique Historical Land-use Database that are indicative of mining or extraction activities.
Are there any Historical Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes
The following Historical Mining information is provided by Groundsure:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details Date (m) 480032 1 185.0 SE Ironstone Quarry 1950 284035 480750 2 712.0 E Old Ironstone Quarry 1950 284097
3.2 Coal Mining
This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within a known coal mining affected area as defined by the coal authority.
Are there any Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer
This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area where JPB hold information relating to mining.
Are there any JPB Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes
The following information provided by JPB is not represented on mapping: Whilst outside of an area where The Coal Authority have information on coal mining activities, Johnson Poole & Bloomer (JPB) have information such as mining plans and maps held within their archive of mining activities that have occurred within 1km of this property. Further details and a quote for services can be obtained by emailing this report to [email protected].
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 19 3.4 Non-Coal Mining
This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area which may have been subject to non-coal historic mining.
Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities
This dataset provides information from the Peter Brett Associates (PBA) mining cavities database (compiled for the national study entitled “Review of mining instability in Great Britain, 1990” PBA has also continued adding to this database) on mineral extraction by mining.
Are there any Non-Coal Mining cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.6 Natural Cavities
This dataset provides information based on Peter Brett Associates natural cavities database.
Are there any Natural Cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.7 Brine Extraction
This data provides information from the Coal Authority issued on behalf of the Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board.
Are there any Brine Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.8 Gypsum Extraction
This dataset provides information on Gypsum extraction from British Gypsum records.
Are there any Gypsum Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 20 3.9 Tin Mining
This dataset provides information on tin mining areas and is derived from tin mining records. This search is based upon postcode information to a sector level.
Are there any Tin Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
3.10 Clay Mining
This dataset provides information on Kaolin and Ball Clay mining from relevant mining records.
Are there any Clay Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 21 4 Natural Ground Subsidence 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Shrink Swell Clay Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 22 4.2 Landslides Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Landslides Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 23 4.3 Ground Dissolution Soluble Rocks Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Ground Dissolution © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Soluble Rocks Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 24 4.4 Compressible Deposits Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Compressible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 25 4.5 Collapsible Deposits Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Collapsible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 26 4.6 Running Sand Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Running Sand Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 27 4 Natural Ground Subsidence
The National Ground Subsidence rating is obtained through the 6 natural ground stability hazard datasets, which are supplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS).
The following GeoSure data represented on the mapping is derived from the BGS Digital Geological map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale.
What is the maximum hazard rating of natural subsidence within the study site** boundary? Low 4.1 Shrink-Swell Clays
The following Shrink Swell information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground investigation required, and 1 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays. Ground conditions predominantly medium plasticity. Do not plant trees with high soil moisture demands near to buildings. For new build, consideration should be given to advice published by the National House Building Council (NHBC) and the 2 0.0 On Site Low Building Research Establishment (BRE). There is a possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential shrink swell problems. For existing property, there is a possible increase in insurance risk, especially during droughts or where vegetation with high moisture demands is present. Ground conditions predominantly medium plasticity. Do not plant trees with high soil moisture demands near to buildings. For new build, consideration should be given to advice published by the National House Building Council (NHBC) and the 3 0.0 On Site Low Building Research Establishment (BRE). There is a possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential shrink swell problems. For existing property, there is a possible increase in insurance risk, especially during droughts or where vegetation with high moisture demands is present. Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground investigation required, and 4 14.0 E Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays.
4.2 Landslides
The following Landslides information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and 1 0.0 On Site Very Low increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.
* This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 28 Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and 2 0.0 On Site Very Low increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides. No indicators for slope instability identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and 3 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides. No indicators for slope instability identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and 4 14.0 E Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.
4.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks
The following Ground Dissolution information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to 1 0.0 On Site Negligible soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks. Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to 2 0.0 On Site Negligible soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks.
4.4 Compressible Deposits
The following Compressible Deposits information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) No indicators for compressible ground identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible ground. No special ground investigation 1 0.0 On Site Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible ground. No indicators for compressible ground identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible ground. No special ground investigation 2 0.0 On Site Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible ground.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 29 4.5 Collapsible Deposits
The following Collapsible Rocks information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be 1 0.0 On Site Very Low present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits. Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be 2 0.0 On Site Very Low present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits.
4.6 Running Sands
The following Running Sands information provided by the British Geological Survey:
Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required to avoid problems due to 1 0.0 On Site Very Low running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. No indicators for running sand identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and 2 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required to avoid problems due to 3 0.0 On Site Very Low running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. No indicators for running sand identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and 4 14.0 E Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 30 5 Borehole Records Map NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Borehole Records Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 31 5 Borehole Records
The systematic analysis of data extracted from the BGS Borehole Records database provides the following information.
Records of boreholes within 250m of the study site boundary: 27
Distance ID Direction NGR BGS Reference Drilled Length Borehole Name (m) 479970 SHEEPBRIDGE F 1 59.0 E SP78SE1 5.97 284250 NORTHANTS 479925 THE GRANGE 2 68.0 SE SP78SE92 -1.0 284158 DESBOROUGH TP110 479947 THE GRANGE 3 77.0 SE SP78SE91 -1.0 284162 DESBOROUGH TP109 480070 4 95.0 E SP88SW3 5.94 SHEEPBRIDGE H 284410 479943 THE GRANGE 5 103.0 SE SP78SE80 -1.0 284127 DESBOROUGH 2 479969 THE GRANGE 6 104.0 SE SP78SE83 -1.0 284146 DESBOROUGH 7 479990 SHEEPBRIDGE E 7 118.0 SE SP78SE2 7.19 284150 NORTHANTS 479982 THE GRANGE 8 124.0 SE SP78SE90 -1.0 284131 DESBOROUGH TP108 479952 THE GRANGE 9 128.0 SE SP78SE89 -1.0 284104 DESBOROUGH TP107 480050 10 130.0 E SP88SW5 4.0 SHEEPBRIDGE G 284260 479973 THE GRANGE 11 133.0 SE SP78SE79 -1.0 284111 DESBOROUGH 1 479927 THE GRANGE 12 141.0 S SP78SE95 -1.0 284079 DESBOROUGH TT102 480000 THE GRANGE 13 152.0 SE SP88SW813 -1.0 284109 DESBOROUGH 3 479974 THE GRANGE 14 161.0 SE SP78SE84 -1.0 284078 DESBOROUGH 8 480210 PANTILE HOUSE 15 169.0 E SP88SW701 3.05 284620 DESBOROUGH 479937 THE GRANGE 16A 171.0 S SP78SE97 -1.0 284051 DESBOROUGH TT104 479955 THE GRANGE 17A 173.0 SE SP78SE81 -1.0 284056 DESBOROUGH 4 479994 THE GRANGE 18 179.0 SE SP78SE88 -1.0 284070 DESBOROUGH TP106 479954 THE GRANGE 19 184.0 S SP78SE87 -1.0 284044 DESBOROUGH TP104 479941 THE GRANGE 20 195.0 S SP78SE94 -1.0 284027 DESBOROUGH TT101 479934 THE GRANGE 21 206.0 S SP78SE93 -1.0 284013 DESBOROUGH TP111 479700 22 206.0 SW SP78SE46 2.0 DESBOROUGH NO.3 284070
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 32 Distance ID Direction NGR BGS Reference Drilled Length Borehole Name (m) 479980 THE GRANGE 23 209.0 SE SP78SE86 -1.0 284027 DESBOROUGH TP103 480013 THE GRANGE 24 217.0 SE SP88SW816 -1.0 284036 DESBOROUGH TP105 480017 THE GRANGE 25 242.0 SE SP88SW814 -1.0 284010 DESBOROUGH 5 479995 THE GRANGE 26B 246.0 SE SP78SE85 -1.0 283994 DESBOROUGH TP102 479982 THE GRANGE 27B 248.0 SE SP78SE96 -1.0 283986 DESBOROUGH TT103
The borehole records are available using the hyperlinks below: Please note that if the donor of the borehole record has requested the information be held as commercial-in-confidence, the additional data will be held separately by the BGS and a formal request must be made for its release.
#1: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/346725 #4: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/358731 #7: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/346726 #10: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/358733 #15: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/359445 #22: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/346770
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 33 6 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry
Records of background estimated soil chemistry within 250m of the study site boundary: 22
For further information on how this data is calculated and limitations upon its use, please see the Groundsure Geoinsight User Guide, available on request.
Distance (m) Direction Sample Type Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Nickel (Ni) Lead (Pb) 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 3.0 NW RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 5.0 NW RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 8.0 NW RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 14.0 E RuralSoil 60 - 120 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 120 - 180 mg/kg 45 - 60 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 14.0 E RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 35.0 S RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 58.0 E RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 211.0 S RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 211.0 S RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 211.0 S RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 211.0 S RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 226.0 S RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 226.0 S RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 242.0 SE RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 242.0 SE RuralSoil 25 - 35 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 30 - 45 mg/kg <100 mg/kg
*As this data is based upon underlying 1:50,000 scale geological information, a 50m buffer has been added to the search radius.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 34 7 Railways and Tunnels Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Railways and Tunnels Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. © OpenStreetMapContributors
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 35 7 Railways and Tunnels
7.1 Tunnels
This data is derived from OpenStreetMap and provides information on the possible locations of underground railway systems in the UK - the London Underground, the Tyne & Wear Metro and the Glasgow Subway.
Have any underground railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No
Have any underground railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map.
This data is derived from Ordnance Survey mapping and provides information on the possible locations of railway tunnels forming part of the UK overground railway network.
Have any other railway tunnels been identified within the site boundary? No
Have any other railway tunnels been identified within 250m of the site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found. Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map.
7.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features
This data is derived from Groundsure's unique Historical Land-use Database and contains features relating to tunnels, railway tracks or associated works that have been identified from historical Ordnance Survey mapping.
Have any historical railway or tunnel features been identified within the study site boundary? No
Have any historical railway or tunnel features been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes
Distance ID Direction NGR Details Date (m) 481337 1 185 SE Mineral Railway Sidings 1950 284438 479987 2 213 SE Railway Sidings 1950 284020
Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 36 7.3 Historical Railways
This data is derived from OpenStreetMap and provides information on the possible alignments of abandoned or dismantled railway lines in proximity to the study site.
Have any historical railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No
Have any historical railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found. Note: multiple sections of the same track may be listed in the detail above
Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map.
7.4 Active Railways
These datasets are derived from Ordnance Survey mapping and OpenStreetMap and provide information on the possible locations of active railway lines in proximity to the study site.
Have any active railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No
Have any active railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found. Note: multiple sections of the same track may be listed in the detail above Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map.
7.5 Railway Projects
These datasets provide information on the location of large scale railway projects High Speed 2 and Crossrail 1 .
Is the study site within 5km of the route of the High Speed 2 rail project? No
Is the study site within 500m of the route of the Crossrail 1 rail project? No
Further information on proximity to these routes, the project construction status and associated works can be obtained through the purchase of a Groundsure HS2 and Crossrail 1 Report.
The route data has been digitised from publicly available maps by Groundsure. The route as provided relates to the Crossrail 1 project only, and does not include any details of the Crossrail 2 project, as final details of the route for Crossrail 2 are still under consultation.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 37 Contact Details
EmapSite Telephone: 0118 9736883 [email protected]
British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email:[email protected] Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries British Gypsum British Gypsum Ltd East Leake Loughborough Leicestershire LE12 6HX
The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0345 7626 848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk
Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health- england Email: [email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000
Johnson Poole & Bloomer Limited Harris and Pearson Building, Brettel Lane Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 3LH Tel: +44 (0) 1384 262 000 Email:[email protected] Website: www.jpb.co.uk
Ordnance Survey Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS
Tel: 08456 050505 Website: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/
Getmapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444 Website:http://www1.getmapping.com/
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 38 Contact Details
Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Waterman Place Reading Berkshire RG1 8DN Tel: +44 (0)118 950 0761 E-mail:[email protected] Website:http://www.peterbrett.com/home
Acknowledgements: Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Groundsure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481518 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481518 39 Standard Terms and Conditions Groundsure reserves the right to withdraw any quotation or proposal at any time before an Order is accepted by Groundsure. Groundsure's acceptance of 1 Definitions an Order shall be binding only when made in writing and signed by In these terms and conditions unless the context otherwise requires: Groundsure's authorised representative or when accepted through the Order “Beneficiary” means the person or entity for whose benefit the Client has Website. obtained the Services. 3 The Client’s obligations “Client” means the party or parties entering into a Contract with Groundsure. 3.1The Client shall comply with the terms of this Contract and “Commercial” means any building or property which is not Residential. (i) procure that the Beneficiary or any third party relying on “Confidential Information” means the contents of this Contract and all the Services complies with and acts as if it is bound by the Contract and information received from the Client as a result of, or in connection with, this (ii) be liable to Groundsure for the acts and omissions of the Contract other than Beneficiary or any third party relying on the Services as if such acts and (i) information which the Client can prove was rightfully in its omissions were those of the Client. possession prior to disclosure by Groundsure and 3.2 The Client shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the Services are (ii) any information which is in the public domain (other than appropriate and suitable for its and/or the Beneficiary’s needs. by virtue of a breach of this Contract). 3.3 The Client shall supply to Groundsure as soon as practicable and without “Support Services” means Support Services provided by Groundsure including, charge all requisite information (and the Client warrants that such information without limitation, interpreting third party and in-house environmental data, is accurate, complete and appropriate), including without limitation any providing environmental support advice, undertaking environmental audits and environmental information relating to the Site and shall give such assistance as assessments, Site investigation, Site monitoring and related items. Groundsure shall reasonably require in the provision of the Services including, “Contract” means the contract between Groundsure and the Client for the without limitation, access to the Site, facilities and equipment. provision of the Services, and which shall incorporate these terms and 3.4 Where the Client’s approval or decision is required to enable Groundsure to conditions, the Order, and the relevant User Guide. carry out work in order to provide the Services, such approval or decision shall “Third Party Data Provider” means any third party providing Third Party be given or procured in reasonable time and so as not to delay or disrupt the Content to Groundsure. performance of the Services. “Data Reports” means reports comprising factual data with no accompanying 3.5 Save as expressly permitted by this Contract the Client shall not, and shall interpretation. procure that the Beneficiary shall not, re-sell, alter, add to, or amend the “Fees” has the meaning set out in clause 5.1. Groundsure Materials, or use the Groundsure Materials in a manner for which “Groundsure” means Groundsure Limited, a company registered in England they were not intended. The Client may make the Groundsure Materials and Wales under number 03421028. available to a third party who is considering acquiring some or all of, or “Groundsure Materials” means all materials prepared by Groundsure and providing funding in relation to, the Site, but such third party cannot rely on the provided as part of the Services, including but not limited to Third Party same unless expressly permitted under clause 4. Content, Data Reports, Mapping, and Risk Screening Reports. 3.6 The Client is responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of its user name “Intellectual Property” means any patent, copyright, design rights, trade or and password if using the Order Website and the Client acknowledges that service mark, moral rights, data protection rights, know-how or trade mark in Groundsure accepts no liability of any kind for any loss or damage suffered by each case whether registered or not and including applications for the same or the Client as a consequence of using the Order Website. any other rights of a similar nature anywhere in the world. “Mapping” means a map, map data or a combination of historical maps of 4 Reliance various ages, time periods and scales. 4.1The Client acknowledges that the Services provided by Groundsure consist “Order” means an electronic, written or other order form submitted by the of the presentation and analysis of Third Party Content and other content and Client requesting Services from Groundsure in respect of a specified Site. that information obtained from a Third Party Data Provider cannot be “Ordnance Survey” means the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and guaranteed or warranted by Groundsure to be reliable. Skills, acting through Ordnance Survey, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 4.2 In respect of Data Reports, Mapping and Risk Screening Reports, the 0AS, UK. following classes of person and no other are entitled to rely on their contents; “Order Website” means the online platform through which Orders may be (i) the Beneficiary, placed by the Client and accepted by Groundsure. (ii) the Beneficiary's professional advisers, (iii) any person “Report” means a Risk Screening Report or Data Report for Commercial or providing funding to the Beneficiary in relation to the Site (whether directly or Residential property. as part of a lending syndicate), “Residential” means any building or property used as or intended to be used as (iv) the first purchaser or first tenant of the Site, and a single dwelling. (v) the professional advisers and lenders of the first purchaser “Risk Screening Report” means a risk screening report comprising factual data or tenant of the Site. with an accompanying interpretation by Groundsure. 4.3 In respect of Support Services, only the Client, Beneficiary and parties “Services” means any Report, Mapping and/or Support Services which expressly named in a Report and no other parties are entitled to rely on its Groundsure has agreed to provide by accepting an Order pursuant to clause contents. 2.6. 4.4 Save as set out in clauses 4.2 and 4.3 and unless otherwise expressly agreed "Site" means the area of land in respect of which the Client has requested in writing, no other person or entity of any kind is entitled to rely on any Groundsure to provide the Services. Services or Report issued or provided by Groundsure. Any party considering “Third Party Content” means data, database information or other information such Reports and Services does so at their own risk. which is provided to Groundsure by a Third Party Data Provider. 5 Fees and Disbursements "User Guide" means the user guide, as amended from time to time, available upon request from Groundsure and on the website (www.Groundsure.com) and 5.1Groundsure shall charge and the Client shall pay fees at the rate and forming part of this Contract. frequency specified in the written proposal, Order Website or Order acknowledgement form, plus (in the case of Support Services) all proper 2 Scope of Services, terms and conditions, requests for insurance disbursements incurred by Groundsure. The Client shall in addition pay all value and quotations added tax or other tax payable on such fees and disbursements in relation to 2.1 Groundsure agrees to provide the Services in accordance with the Contract. the provision of the Services (together “Fees”). 2.2 Groundsure shall exercise reasonable skill and care in the provision of the 5.2 The Client shall pay all outstanding Fees to Groundsure in full without Services. deduction, counterclaim or set off within 30 days of the date of Groundsure’s 2.3 Subject to clause 7.3 the Client acknowledges that it has not relied on any invoice or such other period as may be agreed in writing between Groundsure statement or representation made by or on behalf of Groundsure which is not and the Client ("Payment Date"). Interest on late payments will accrue on a set out and expressly agreed in writing in the Contract and all such statements daily basis from the Payment Date until the date of payment (whether before and representations are hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. or after judgment) at the rate of 8% per annum. 2.4 The Client acknowledges that terms and conditions appearing on a Client’s 5.3 The Client shall be deemed to have agreed the amount of any invoice unless order form, printed stationery or other communication, or any terms or an objection is made in writing within 28 days of the date of the invoice. As soon conditions implied by custom, practice or course of dealing shall be of no effect, as reasonably practicable after being notified of an objection, without prejudice and that this Contract shall prevail over all others in relation to the Order. to clause 5.2 a member of Groundsure’s management team will contact the 2.5 If the Client or Beneficiary requests insurance in conjunction with or as a Client and the parties shall then use all reasonable endeavours to resolve the result of the Services, Groundsure shall use reasonable endeavours to dispute within 15 days. recommend such insurance, but makes no warranty that such insurance shall 6 Intellectual Property and Confidentiality be available from insurers or that it will be offered on reasonable terms. Any insurance purchased by the Client or Beneficiary shall be subject solely to the 6.1 Subject to terms of the policy issued by insurers and Groundsure will have no liability (i) full payment of all relevant Fees and therefor. In addition you acknowledge and agree that Groundsure does not act (ii) compliance with this Contract, the Client is granted (and is as an agent or broker for any insurance providers. The Client should take (and permitted to sub-licence to the Beneficiary) a royalty-free, worldwide, non- ensure that the Beneficiary takes) independent advice to ensure that the assignable and (save to the extent set out in this Contract) non-transferable insurance policy requested or offered is suitable for its requirements. licence to make use of the Groundsure Materials. 2.6 Groundsure's quotations or proposals are valid for a period of 30 days only 6.2 All Intellectual Property in the Groundsure Materials are and shall remain unless an alternative period of time is explicitly stipulated by Groundsure. owned by Groundsure or Groundsure's licensors (including without limitation the Third Party Data Providers) the Client acknowledges, and shall procure acknowledgement by the Beneficiary of, such ownership. Nothing in this 8 Groundsure’s right to suspend or terminate Contract purports to transfer or assign any rights to the Client or the 8.1 If Groundsure reasonably believes that the Client or Beneficiary has not Beneficiary in respect of such Intellectual Property. provided the information or assistance required to enable the proper provision 6.3 Third Party Data Providers may enforce any breach of clauses 6.1 and 6.2 of the Services, Groundsure shall be entitled to suspend all further performance against the Client or Beneficiary. of the Services until such time as any such deficiency has been made good. 6.4 The Client shall, and shall procure that any recipients of the Groundsure 8.2 Groundsure shall be entitled to terminate the Contract immediately on Materials shall: written notice in the event that: (i) not remove, suppress or modify any trade mark, copyright (i) the Client fails to pay any sum due to Groundsure within or other proprietary marking belonging to Groundsure or any third party from 30 days of the Payment Date; or the Services; (ii) the Client (being an individual) has a bankruptcy order (ii) use the information obtained as part of the Services in made against him or (being a company) shall enter into liquidation whether respect of the subject Site only, and shall not store or reuse any information compulsory or voluntary or have an administration order made against it or if a obtained as part of the Services provided in respect of adjacent or nearby sites; receiver shall be appointed over the whole or any part of its property assets or (iii) not create any product or report which is derived directly undertaking or if the Client is struck off the Register of Companies or dissolved; or indirectly from the Services (save that those acting in a professional capacity or to the Beneficiary may provide advice based upon the Services); (iii) the Client being a company is unable to pay its debts (iv) not combine the Services with or incorporate such Services within the meaning of Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or being an into any other information data or service; individual appears unable to pay his debts within the meaning of Section 268 of (v) not reformat or otherwise change (whether by the Insolvency Act 1986 or if the Client shall enter into a composition or modification, addition or enhancement), the Services (save that those acting for arrangement with the Client’s creditors or shall suffer distress or execution to the Beneficiary in a professional capacity shall not be in breach of this clause be levied on his goods; or 6.4(v) where such reformatting is in the normal course of providing advice (iv) the Client or the Beneficiary breaches any term of the based upon the Services); Contract (including, but not limited to, the obligations in clause 4) which is (vi) where a Report and/or Mapping contains material incapable of remedy or if remediable, is not remedied within five days of notice belonging to Ordnance Survey, acknowledge and agree that such content is of the breach. protected by Crown Copyright and shall not use such content for any purpose outside of receiving the Services; and 9. Client’s Right to Terminate and Suspend (vii) not copy in whole or in part by any means any map prints 9.1 Subject to clause 10.1, the Client may at any time upon written notice or run-on copies containing content belonging to Ordnance Survey (other than terminate or suspend the provision of all or any of the Services. that contained within Ordnance Survey’s OS Street Map) without first being in 9.2 In any event, where the Client is a consumer (and not a business) he/she possession of a valid Paper Map Copying Licence from Ordnance Survey, hereby expressly acknowledges and agrees that: 6.5 Notwithstanding clause 6.4, the Client may make reasonable use of the (i) the supply of Services under this Contract (and therefore Groundsure Materials in order to advise the Beneficiary in a professional the performance of this Contract) commences immediately upon Groundsure's capacity. However, Groundsure shall have no liability in respect of any advice, acceptance of the Order; and opinion or report given or provided to Beneficiaries by the Client. (ii) the Reports and/or Mapping provided under this Contract 6.6 The Client shall procure that any person to whom the Services are made are available shall notify Groundsure of any request or requirement to disclose, (a) supplied to the Client's specification(s) and in any event publish or disseminate any information contained in the Services in accordance (b) by their nature cannot be returned. with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Environmental Information 10 Consequences of Withdrawal, Termination or Suspension Regulations 2004 or any associated legislation or regulations in force from time to time. 10.1 Upon termination of the Contract: (i) Groundsure shall take steps to bring to an end the Services 7.Liability: Particular Attention Should Be Paid To This Clause in an orderly manner, vacate any Site with all reasonable speed and shall deliver 7.1 This Clause 7 sets out the entire liability of Groundsure, including any to the Client and/or Beneficiary any property of the Client and/or Beneficiary in liability for the acts or omissions of its employees, agents, consultants, Groundsure’s possession or control; and subcontractors and Third Party Content, in respect of: (ii) the Client shall pay to Groundsure all and any Fees (i) any breach of contract, including any deliberate breach of payable in respect of the performance of the Services up to the date of the Contract by Groundsure or its employees, agents or termination or suspension. In respect of any Support Services provided, the subcontractors; Client shall also pay Groundsure any additional costs incurred in relation to the (ii) any use made of the Reports, Services, Materials or any termination or suspension of the Contract. part of them; and 11 Anti-Bribery (iii) any representation, statement or tortious act or omission (including negligence) arising under or in connection with the Contract. 11.1 The Client warrants that it shall: 7.2 All warranties, conditions and other terms implied by statute or common (i) comply with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations law are, to the fullest extent permitted by law, excluded from the Contract. relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption including but not limited to the 7.3 Nothing in the Contract limits or excludes the liability of the Supplier for Bribery Act 2010; death or personal injury resulting from negligence, or for any damage or (ii) comply with such of Groundsure's anti-bribery and anti- liability incurred by the Client or Beneficiary as a result of fraud or fraudulent corruption policies as are notified to the Client from time to time; and misrepresentation. (iii) promptly report to Groundsure any request or demand for 7.4 Groundsure shall not be liable for any undue financial or other advantage of any kind received by or on behalf of (i) loss of profits; the Client in connection with the performance of this Contract. (ii) loss of business; 11.2 Breach of this Clause 11 shall be deemed a material breach of this (iii) depletion of goodwill and/or similar losses; Contract. (iv) loss of anticipated savings; 12 General (v) loss of goods; 12.1 The Mapping contained in the Services is protected by Crown copyright (vi) loss of contract; and must not be used for any purpose other than as part of the Services or as (vii) loss of use; specifically provided in the Contract. (viii) loss or corruption of data or information; 12.2 The Client shall be permitted to make one copy only of each Report or (ix) business interruption; Mapping Order. Thereafter the Client shall be entitled to make unlimited copies (x) any kind of special, indirect, consequential or pure of the Report or Mapping Order only in accordance with an Ordnance Survey economic loss, costs, damages, charges or expenses; paper map copy license available through Groundsure. (xi) loss or damage that arise as a result of the use of all or 12.3 Groundsure reserves the right to amend or vary this Contract. No part of the Groundsure Materials in breach of the Contract; amendment or variation to this Contract shall be valid unless signed by an (xii) loss or damage arising as a result of any error, omission or authorised representative of Groundsure. inaccuracy in any part of the Groundsure Materials where such error, omission 12.4 No failure on the part of Groundsure to exercise, and no delay in or inaccuracy is caused by any Third Party Content or any reasonable exercising, any right, power or provision under this Contract shall operate as a interpretation of Third Party Content; waiver thereof. (xiii) loss or damage to a computer, software, modem, 12.5 Save as expressly provided in this Contract, no person other than the telephone or other property; and persons set out therein shall have any right under the Contract (Rights of Third (xiv) loss or damage caused by a delay or loss of use of Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any terms of the Contract. Groundsure’s internet ordering service. 12.6 The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) or BIS’ 7.5 Groundsure’s total liability in relation to or under the Contract shall be successor body, as the case may be, acting through Ordnance Survey may limited to £10 million for any claim or claims. enforce a breach of clause 6.4(vi) and clause 6.4(vii) of these terms and 7.6 Groundsure shall procure that the Beneficiary shall be bound by limitations conditions against the Client in accordance with the provisions of the Contracts and exclusions of liability in favour of Groundsure which accord with those (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. detailed in clauses 7.4 and 7.5 (subject to clause 7.3) in respect of all claims 12.7 Groundsure shall not be liable to the Client if the provision of the Services which the Beneficiary may bring against Groundsure in relation to the Services is delayed or prevented by one or more of the following circumstances: or other matters arising pursuant to the Contract. (i) the Client or Beneficiary’s failure to provide facilities, access or information; (ii) fire, storm, flood, tempest or epidemic; (iii) Acts of God or the public enemy; (iv) riot, civil commotion or war; (v) strikes, labour disputes or industrial action; (vi) acts or regulations of any governmental or other agency; (vii) suspension or delay of services at public registries by Third Party Data Providers; (viii) changes in law; or (ix) any other reason beyond Groundsure’s reasonable control. In the event that Groundsure is prevented from performing the Services (or any part thereof) in accordance with this clause 12.6 for a period of not less than 30 days then Groundsure shall be entitled to terminate this Contract immediately on written notice to the Client. 12.8 Any notice provided shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered by hand or sent by first class post, facsimile or by email to the address, facsimile number or email address of the relevant party as may have been notified by each party to the other for such purpose or in the absence of such notification the last known address. 12.9 Such notice shall be deemed to have been received on the day of delivery if delivered by hand, facsimile or email (save to the extent such day is not a working day where it shall be deemed to have been delivered on the next working day) and on the second working day after the day of posting if sent by first class post. 12.10 The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all previous arrangements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 12.11 Each of the provisions of the Contract is severable and distinct from the others and if one or more provisions is or should become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be tainted or impaired. 12.12 This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law and any proceedings arising out of or connected with this Contract shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. 12.13 Groundsure is an executive member of the Council of Property Search Organisation (CoPSO) and has signed up to the Search Code administered by the Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB). All Risk Screening Reports shall be supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Search Code. 12.14 If the Client or Beneficiary has a complaint about the Services, written notice should be given to the Compliance Officer at Groundsure who will respond in a timely manner. In the event you are not satisfied with Groundsure’s complaints handling process or you are unable to resolve the complaint, at your discretion you may refer the complaint to The Property Ombudsman Scheme at the following URL/email: website www.tpos.co.uk or email: [email protected] 12.15 The Client agrees that it shall, and shall procure that each Beneficiary shall, treat in confidence all Confidential Information and shall not, and shall procure that each Beneficiary shall not (i) disclose any Confidential Information to any third party other than in accordance with the terms of this Contract; and (ii) use Confidential Information for a purpose other than the exercise of its rights and obligations under this Contract. Subject to clause 6.6, nothing shall prevent the Client or any Beneficiary from disclosing Confidential Information to the extent required by law
© Groundsure Limited June 2013 EmapSite Groundsure EMS-358742_481519 Reference: Masdar House, , Eversley, RG27 0RP Your Reference: EMS_358742_481519
Report Date 26 Apr 2016
Report Delivery Email - pdf Method:
Groundsure Enviroinsight
Address: Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshire,NN14 2WB,
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Thank you for placing your order with Groundsure. Please find enclosed the Groundsure Enviroinsight as requested.
If you would like further assistance regarding this report then please contact the emapsite customer services team on 0118 9736883 quoting the above report reference number.
Yours faithfully,
emapsite customer services team
Enc. Groundsure Enviroinsight Groundsure Enviroinsight
Address: Magnetic Park Sites B+C,Kettering,Northamptonshire,NN14 2WB,
Date: 26 Apr 2016
Reference: EMS-358742_481519
Client: EmapSite
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 16-Apr-2014 Grid Reference: 479929,284394 Site Size: 2.39ha
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 2 Contents Page
Contents Page 3 Overview of Findings 6 Using this report 10 1. Historical Land Use 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites 12 1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping...... 12 1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database...... 13 1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database...... 13 1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database...... 14 1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database...... 14 1.6 Potentially Infilled Land...... 14 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map 16 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers 17 2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations...... 17 2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: ...... 18 2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:...... 18 2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:...... 18 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site: ...... 19 2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:...... 19 2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites...... 19 2.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents...... 19 2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:...... 19 2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:...... 20 2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990...... 20 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map 21 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites 22 3.1 Landfill Sites...... 22 3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency landfill data within 1000m of the study site: ...... 22 3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 22 3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:...... 23 3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site:...... 23 3.2 Other Waste Sites...... 23 3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site: ...... 23 3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 23 4. Current Land Use Map 25 4. Current Land Uses 26 4.1 Current Industrial Data...... 26 4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites...... 27 4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables...... 27 4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines...... 27 5. Geology 28 5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground...... 28
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 3 5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology ...... 28 5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology ...... 28 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 29 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology 29 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses 30 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses 31 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer 32 6e. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality 33 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology 34 6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits...... 34 6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits...... 34 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences...... 35 6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences...... 35 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences...... 35 6.6 Source Protection Zones...... 35 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer...... 36 6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential...... 36 6.9 River Quality...... 36 6.9.1 Biological Quality:...... 36 6.9.2 Chemical Quality:...... 36 6.10 Detailed River Network...... 37 6.11 Surface Water Features...... 37 7a. Environment Agency Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea) 38 7b. Environment Agency Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map 39 7 Flooding 40 7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding...... 40 7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding...... 40 7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating...... 40 7.4 Flood Defences...... 40 7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences...... 40 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage...... 41 7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas...... 41 7.7.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site? Yes...... 41 7.7.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions?...... 41 7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas...... 41 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map 42 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites 43 8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site: ...... 44 8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: ...... 45 8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 45 8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 45 8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:...... 45 8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:...... 45
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 4 8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site:...... 45 9. Natural Hazards Findings 46 9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data...... 46 9.1.1 Shrink Swell...... 46 9.1.2 Landslides...... 46 9.1.3 Soluble Rocks...... 46 9.1.4 Compressible Ground...... 47 9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks...... 47 9.1.6 Running Sand...... 47 9.2 Radon...... 47 9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 47 9.2.2 Radon Protection...... 48 10. Mining 49 10.1 Coal Mining...... 49 10.2 Non-Coal Mining...... 49 10.3 Brine Affected Areas ...... 49 Contact Details 50 Standard Terms and Conditions 52
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 5 Overview of Findings
For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the main report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded.
Section 1: Historical Industrial Sites On-site 0-50 51-250 251-500
1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale 0 1 8 35 mapping
1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database 0 0 8 1
1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database 0 3 0 1
1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site 0 0 0 0 Database
1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 0 Repair Database
1.6 Potentially Infilled Land 0 0 3 28
Section 2: Environmental Permits, Incidents and On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 Registers
2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Environmental Permits and/or Authorisations
2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations 0 0 0 0
2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities 0 0 0 0
2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents 0 0 0 0
2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0
2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0
2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements 0 0 2 0
2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances 0 0 0 0 Authorisations
2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents 0 0 2 0
2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals 0 0 0 0
2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and 0 0 0 0 Enforcements within 500m of the study site
2.2 Records of COMAH and NIHHS sites 0 0 0 0
2.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents
2.3.1 National Incidents Recording System, List 2 0 1 1 0
2.3.2 National Incidents Recording System, List 1 0 0 1 0
2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 0 0 0 0 1990
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 6 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Section 3: Landfill and Other Waste Sites 1500
3.1 Landfill Sites
3.1.1 Environment Agency Registered Landfill Sites 0 0 0 0 0 Not searched
3.1.2 Environment Agency Historic Landfill Sites 0 0 0 1 1 2
3.1.3 BGS/DoE Landfill Site Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.1.4 Records of Landfills in Local Authority and Historical 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mapping Records
3.2 Landfill and Other Waste Sites Findings
3.2.1 Operational and Non-Operational Waste Treatment, 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched Transfer and Disposal Sites
3.2.2 Environment Agency Licensed Waste Sites 0 0 0 0 1 5
Section 4: Current Land Use On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500
4.1 Current Industrial Sites Data 1 2 15 Not searched
4.2 Records of Petrol and Fuel Sites 0 0 0 0
4.3 National Grid Underground Electricity Cables 0 0 0 0
4.4 National Grid Gas Transmission Pipelines 0 0 0 0
Section 5: Geology
5.1 Are there any records of Artificial Ground and Made Ground Yes present beneath the study site?
5.2 Are there any records of Superficial Ground and Drift Geology Yes present beneath the study site?
5.3 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study site see the detailed findings section.
Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m
6.1 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Superficial Yes Geology within 500m of the study site?
6.2 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Bedrock Yes Geology within 500m of the study site? 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 2000 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)
6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)
6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)
6.6 Source Protection Zones (within 500m of the study site) 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched
6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched
6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential (within 1 1 0 0 Not searched Not searched 500m of the study site) 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 1500
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 7 Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m
6.9 Is there any Environment Agency information on river quality No No No No No No within 1500m of the study site?
6.10 Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the site 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched
6.11 Surface water features within 250m of the study site No Yes No Not searched Not searched Not searched
Section 7: Flooding
7.1 Are there any Enviroment Agency Zone 2 floodplains within No 250m of the study site?
7.2 Are there any Environment Agency Zone 3 floodplains within No 250m of the study site
7.3 What is the Risk of flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Very Low rating for the study site?
7.4 Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No
7.5 Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within No 250m of the study site?
7.6 Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the No study site?
7.7 What is the maximum BGS Groundwater Flooding susceptibility Potential at Surface within 50m of the study site?
7.8 What is the BGS confidence rating for the Groundwater Moderate Flooding susceptibility areas?
1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000
8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 0 0 0 0 0 3
8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.5 Records of Ramsar sites 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.6 Records of Ancient Woodlands 0 0 0 1 1 5
8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) 0 0 0 0 0 1
8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 8 1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000
8.11 Records of National Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 2 0 1 0 1 0
8.14 Records of Green Belt land 0 0 0 0 0 0
Section 9: Natural Hazards
9.1 What is the maximum risk of natural ground subsidence? Low
9.1.1 What is the maximum Shrink-Swell hazard rating identified Low on the study site?
9.1.2 What is the maximum Landslides hazard rating identified on Very Low the study site?
9.1.3 What is the maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating Negligible identified on the study site?
9.1.4 What is the maximum Compressible Ground hazard rating Negligible identified on the study site?
9.1.5 What is the maximum Collapsible Rocks hazard rating Very Low identified on the study site?
9.1.6 What is the maximum Running Sand hazard rating Very Low identified on the study site?
9.2 Radon
9.2.1 Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the The property is in a Radon Affected Area, as between 5 and 10% of Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of properties are above the Action Level. homes are above the Action Level?
9.2.2 Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as Basic radon protective measures are necessary. described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment?
Section 10: Mining
10.1 Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No
10.2 Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study No site boundary?
10.3 Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study No site?
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 9 Using this report The following report is designed by Environmental Consultants for Environmental Professionals bringing together the most up-to-date market leading environmental data. This report is provided under and subject to the Terms & Conditions agreed between Groundsure and the Client. The document contains the following sections: 1. Historical Industrial Sites Provides information on past land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. Potentially Infilled Land features are also included. This search is conducted using radii of up to 500m. 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Provides information on Regulated Industrial Activities and Pollution Incidents as recorded by Regulatory Authorit- ies, and sites determined as Contaminated Land. This search is conducted using radii up to 500m. 3. Landfills and Other Waste Sites Provides information on landfills and other waste sites that may pose a risk to the study site. This search is conduc - ted using radii up to 1500m. 4. Current Land Uses Provides information on current land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 500m. This includes information on potentially contaminative industrial sites, petrol stations and fuel sites as well as high pressure gas pipelines and un- derground electricity transmission lines. 5. Geology Provides information on artificial and superficial deposits and bedrock beneath the study site. 6. Hydrogeology and Hydrology Provides information on productive strata within the bedrock and superficial geological layers, abstraction licenses, Source Protection Zones (SPZs) and river quality. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 7. Flooding Provides information on river and coastal flooding, flood defences, flood storage areas and groundwater flood areas. This search is conducted using radii of up to 250m. 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Provides information on the Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), National Nature Reserves (NNR), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA), Ramsar sites, Local Nature Reserves (LNR), Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), National Parks (NP), Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and World Heritage Sites and Scheduled Ancient Woodland. These searches are conduc- ted using radii of up to 2000m. 9. Natural Hazards Provides information on a range of natural hazards that may pose a risk to the study site. These factors include nat- ural ground subsidence and radon.. 10. Mining Provides information on areas of coal and non-coal mining and brine affected areas. 11. Contacts This section of the report provides contact points for statutory bodies and data providers that may be able to provide further information on issues raised within this report. Alternatively, Groundsure provide a free Technical Helpline (08444 159000) for further information and guidance. Note: Maps Only certain features are placed on the maps within the report. All features represented on maps found within this search are given an identification number. This number identifies the feature on the mapping and correlates it to the additional information provided below. This identification number precedes all other information and takes the following format -Id: 1, Id: 2, etc. Where numerous features on the same map are in such close proximity that the numbers would obscure each other a letter identifier is used instead to represent the features. (e.g. Three features which overlap may be given the identifier “A” on the map and would be identified separately as features 1A, 3A, 10A on the data tables provided). Where a feature is reported in the data tables to a distance greater than the map area, it is noted in the data table as “Not Shown”. All distances given in this report are in Metres (m). Directions are given as compass headings such as N: North, E: East, NE: North East from the nearest point of the study site boundary.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 10 1. Historical Land Use
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites
1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping
The systematic analysis of data extracted from standard 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical maps provides the following information:
Records of sites with a potentially contaminative past land use within 500m of the search boundary: 44
ID Distance [m] Direction Use Date 1 23 W Unspecified Factory 1970 2A 91 N Unspecified Depot 1970 3A 91 N Unspecified Depot 1982 4A 91 N Unspecified Depot 1992 5B 185 SE Ironstone Quarry 1950 6 185 SE Mineral Railway Sidings 1950 7C 188 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 8B 189 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 9C 213 SE Railway Sidings 1950 10D 268 E Unspecified Old Quarry 1950 11D 270 E Unspecified Old Quarry 1950 12E 288 NE Unspecified Works 1982 13E 288 NE Unspecified Works 1970 14E 288 NE Unspecified Works 1992 15R 362 SW Cuttings 1970 16F 365 SW Cuttings 1950 17F 365 SW Cuttings 1938 18F 366 SW Cuttings 1950 19G 368 SW Cuttings 1885 20G 368 SW Cuttings 1899 21E 369 NE Unspecified Tank 1970 22E 369 NE Unspecified Tank 1982 23S 378 SW Cuttings 1970 24H 385 SW Cuttings 1899 25H 385 SW Cuttings 1885 26I 400 S Railway Sidings 1885 27I 400 S Railway Sidings 1899 28J 422 S Railway Sidings 1938 29J 424 S Railway Sidings 1950 30K 434 S Unspecified Works 1970 31 437 S Water Works 1899 32J 449 S Railway Sidings 1970 33 453 S Water Works 1950 34K 455 S Unspecified Heap 1950
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 12 35L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1992 Workings 36L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1970 Workings 37L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1982 Workings 38T 468 S Unspecified Ground 1970 Workings 39U 470 S Unspecified Heap 1970 40V 474 SE Cuttings 1938 41 476 S Railway Sidings 1950 42M 478 SE Unspecified Pit 1950 43W 478 SE Cuttings 1950 44M 478 SE Unspecified Old Quarry 1899
1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database
The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.
Records of historical tanks within 500m of the search boundary: 9
ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 45N 113 W Tanks 1969 46N 114 W Tanks 1970 47N 114 W Tanks 1993 48N 119 W Tanks 1969 49N 120 W Tanks 1993 50N 120 W Tanks 1970 51O 192 NW Unspecified Tank 1970 52O 193 NW Unspecified Tank 1969 53E 375 NE Unspecified Tank 1969
1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database
The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.
Records of historical energy features within 500m of the search boundary: 4
ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 54P 18 W Electricity Transformer 1969 55P 19 W Electricity Transformer 1970 56P 19 W Electricity Substation 1993
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 13 57L 466 SE Electricity Substation 1968
1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database
The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.
Records of historical petrol stations and fuel sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0
Database searched and no data found.
1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database
The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.
Records of historical garage and motor vehicle repair sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0
Database searched and no data found.
1.6 Potentially Infilled Land
Records of Potentially Infilled Features from 1:10,000 scale mapping within 500m of the study site: 31
The following Historical Potentially Infilled Features derived from the Historical Mapping information is provided by Groundsure: ID Distance(m) Direction Use Date 58B 185 SE Ironstone Quarry 1950 59C 188 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 60B 189 SE Unspecified Quarry 1950 61D 268 E Unspecified Old Quarry 1950 62D 270 E Unspecified Old Quarry 1950 63Q 271 NE Ponds 1899 64Q 271 NE Ponds 1885 65Q 272 NE Ponds 1982 66R 362 SW Cuttings 1970 67F 365 SW Cuttings 1950 68F 365 SW Cuttings 1938 69F 366 SW Cuttings 1950 70G 368 SW Cuttings 1899 71G 368 SW Cuttings 1885 72S 378 SW Cuttings 1970 73H 385 SW Cuttings 1899 74H 385 SW Cuttings 1885 75K 455 S Unspecified Heap 1950
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 14 76L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1970 Workings 77L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1982 Workings 78L 456 SE Unspecified Ground 1992 Workings 79K 458 S Reservoir 1970 80K 459 S Reservoir 1938 81K 459 S Reservoir 1899 82K 459 S Reservoir 1950 83T 468 S Unspecified Ground 1970 Workings 84U 470 S Unspecified Heap 1970 85V 474 SE Cuttings 1938 86M 478 SE Unspecified Pit 1950 87W 478 SE Cuttings 1950 88M 478 SE Unspecified Old Quarry 1899
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 15 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 16 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers
2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations
Searches of information provided by the Environment Agency and Local Authorities reveal the following information:
2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 17 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:
2
The following Part A(2) and Part B Activities are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Address: Small Lots, Kettering, Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified Northamptonshire, NN15 5PU 480012 Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 6 53 N Process: cement/lime/mortar process 284664 Notified Status: Historical Permit Comment: No Enforcements Notified Permit Type: Part B Address: Albany Shed Company Ltd, Stoke Albany Road, Desborough, Enforcement: Enforcement Notified 480042 Northamptonshire, NN14 2SR Date of Enforcement: 12/09/06, 7 126 N 284737 Process: Timber & Wood Based Product 12/10/2007, 03/12/2007 Status: Current Permit Comment: Timber and timber coating Permit Type: Part B
2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:
2
The following Licensed Discharge Consents records are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Address: HARBOROUGH ROAD, Receiving Water: DESBOROUGH, KETTERING, NORTHANTS Status: PRE NRA LEGISLATION WHERE Effluent Type: SEWAGE DISCHARGES - 479780 ISSUE DATE < 01-SEP-89 (HISTORIC ONLY) 4 65 W FINAL/TREATED EFFLUENT - NOT WATER 284250 Issue date: 31/01/1985 COMPANY Effective Date: 31-Jan-1985 Permit Number: PR5NF779 Revocation Date: - Permit Version: 1 Address: MILLBUCK IND EST, STOKE Receiving Water: ALBANY RD, DESBOROUGH, KETTERING, Status: PRE NRA LEGISLATION WHERE 479900 NORTHANTS ISSUE DATE < 01-SEP-89 (HISTORIC ONLY) 5 121 NW 284640 Effluent Type: UNSPECIFIED Issue date: 15/07/1974 Permit Number: PR5LF3208 Effective Date: 15-Jul-1974 Permit Version: 1 Revocation Date: 01/10/1996
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 18 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites
Records of COMAH & NIHHS sites within 500m of the study site: 0
Database searched and no data found.
2.3 Environment Agency Recorded Pollution Incidents
2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:
2
The following NIRS List 2 records are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Incident Date: 19-Dec-2002 Incident Identification: 126756 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 479978 1 14 NW Pollutant: Contaminated Water Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 284567 Pollutant Description: Other Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Contaminated Water Incident Date: 05-Jan-2006 Water Impact: Category 2 (Significant) 479758 Incident Identification: 369461 2 84 W Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 284242 Pollutant: Contaminated Water Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Pollutant Description: Backwash Effluent
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 19 2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:
1
The following NIRS List 1 records are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map:
Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e(m) Incident Date: 25-Oct-1999 Priority Description: Immediate (2 Incident Identification: 3579.0 Hours) Catchments Name: R.JORDAN Waste Description: Not Available (MKT.HARBOROUGH) 3 173 W Water Impact: Significant Impact Water Description: RIVER STRETCH Land Impact: No Impact (FRESHWATER) Air Impact: No Impact Water Course: JORDAN Action Taken: Prosecution Incident Substantiated: Yes
2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990
How many records of sites determined as contaminated land under Section 78R of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 are there within 500m of the study site? 0
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 20 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 21 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites
3.1 Landfill Sites
3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency landfill data within 1000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:
4
The following landfill records are represented as either points or polygons on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Peaselands, Peaselands, Licence Issue: 08-Sep-1989 Desborough Licence Surrendered: 31-Aug-1991 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Hold Address: Gayton House, 479800 1 470 S Site Reference: K/027, KE/87/382C Collingwood Road, Northampton 283600 Waste Type: Inert Operator: Gayton Homes Limited Environmental Permitting Regulations First Recorded: 30-Sep-1989 (Waste) Reference: - Last Recorded: 31-Aug-1991 Site Address: Railway Cutting, Harrington Licence Issue: Road, Desborough Licence Surrendered: Waste Licence: - Not 479700 Licence Hold Address: - 666 S Site Reference: KE/74/430C shown 283400 Operator: - Waste Type: Inert First Recorded: 31-Dec-1974 Environmental Permitting Regulations Last Recorded: - (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Rear Of Goode And Marlow Licence Issue: 21-May-1980 Limited, Rushton Road, Desborough Licence Surrendered: 31-Dec-1986 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Hold Address: PO Box 7, Rushton Not 481000 Site Reference: K/77/003, K/003, 1194 SE Road, Desborough, Northamptonshire shown 283500 KE/79/1962C Operator: Rigid Containers Limited Waste Type: Inert First Recorded: 31-Dec-1950 Environmental Permitting Regulations Last Recorded: 31-May-1988 (Waste) Reference: - Site Address: Federation Avenue, Licence Issue: 31-Dec-1977 Federation Avenue, Desborough Licence Surrendered: Waste Licence: Yes Not 479800 Licence Hold Address: - 1244 S Site Reference: KE/77/1380C shown 282900 Operator: - Waste Type: Inert First Recorded: 31-Dec-1977 Environmental Permitting Regulations Last Recorded: - (Waste) Reference: -
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 22 3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
3.2 Other Waste Sites
3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site:
6
The following waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:
Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Woodside, Stock Albany Road, Desborough, Kettering, Northants, Issue Date: 13/11/2012 NN14 2SP Effective Date: - Type: HCI Waste TS + treatment Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - 480522 5 697 NE Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - 285115 (Waste) Licence Number: LOC032 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/LB3538AW/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Local Skips Limited Site Name: Local Skips Ltd Waste Management licence No: 104774 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 74999.0 Site Address: Unit 2, Eckland Lodge Farm, Desborough Road, Market Harborough, Issue Date: 08/04/1999 Leicestershire, LE16 8HB Effective Date: - Type: Household, Commercial & Industrial Modified: - Waste T Stn Surrendered Date: 31/07/2003 Not 478700 Size: < 25000 tonnes 1286 NW Expiry Date: - shown 284900 Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: JMO001 Status: Surrendered EPR reference: EA/EPR/DP3994NK/A001 Site Name: J & M Oils Operator: Masding John Michael Walter Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 73007 Annual Tonnage: 1689.0
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 23 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Bottom Farm, Stoke Albany Issue Date: 16/12/2011 Road, Desborough, Northants, NN14 2SP Effective Date: - Type: Vehicle depollution facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: 05/12/2013 Not 481020 Environmental Permitting Regulations 1343 NE Expiry Date: - shown 285530 (Waste) Licence Number: FOX027 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/EB3233AA/S002 Status: Surrendered Operator: Fox's Pallets Ltd Site Name: Fox's Vehicle Dismantlers Waste Management licence No: 103743 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 0.0 Site Address: Bottom Farm, Desborough Airfield, Stoke Albany Road, Desborough, Issue Date: 18/06/2013 Kettering, Northants, NN14 2SP Effective Date: - Type: ELV Facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 480994 Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - 1382 NE shown 285611 (Waste) Licence Number: FRA066 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/AB3008CR/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Frank Beale Vehicle Dismantler Site Name: Bottom Farm Vehicle Limited Dismantling Facility Waste Management licence No: 400335 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 2500.0 Site Address: Wright Mr D R, Stoke Road, Desborough, Northamptonshir, NN14 2SP Issue Date: 20/05/1993 Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Effective Date: - Dismantler) Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 481100 1383 NE Environmental Permitting Regulations Expiry Date: - shown 285500 (Waste) Licence Number: WRI001 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/LP3295NM/V002 Status: Revoked Operator: Mr D R Wright Site Name: Bottom Farm Waste Management licence No: 70617 Correspondence Address: -, - Annual Tonnage: 5000.0 Site Address: Beale Mr F D, Desborough Airfield, Stoke Albany Road, Desborough, Issue Date: 05/10/1992 Northants, NN14 2SP Effective Date: - Type: Metal Recycling Site (Vehicle Modified: - Dismantler) Surrendered Date: - Not 481100 Size: < 25000 tonnes 1383 NE Expiry Date: - shown 285500 Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - (Waste) Licence Number: BEA001 Status: Issued EPR reference: EA/EPR/LP3495NK/A001 Site Name: Bottom Farm- Desborough Operator: Mr F D Beale Correspondence Address: -, - Waste Management licence No: 70616 Annual Tonnage: 5000.0
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 24 4. Current Land Use Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 25 4. Current Land Uses
4.1 Current Industrial Data
Records of potentially contaminative industrial sites within 250m of the study site: 18
The following records are represented as points on the Current Land Uses map.
Distance Directio ID Company NGR Address Activity Category (m) n Electricity 479881 Infrastructure and 1 0 On Site NN14 Electrical Features Sub Station 284225 Facilities Electricity 480035 Infrastructure and 2 17 E NN14 Electrical Features Sub Station 284542 Facilities Electricity 479832 Infrastructure and 3 23 W NN14 Electrical Features Sub Station 284277 Facilities Unit 5 Magnetic Park, Okay 480093 Eagle Avenue, 4 63 E Engineering Civil Engineers Engineering Services 284569 Desborough, Kettering, Services Ltd NN14 2WD 479983 Transport, Storage and 5 67 NW Depot NN14 Container and Storage 284665 Delivery 480006 Transport, Storage and 6 71 N Depot NN14 Container and Storage 284681 Delivery 479771 7A 101 W Tank NN14 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 284385 479765 8A 108 W Tank NN14 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 284389 479762 9A 111 W Tank NN14 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 284391 479759 10A 113 W Tank NN14 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 284388 479754 11A 116 W Tank NN14 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 284382 Stoke Albany Road, Albany Shed 480042 12 126 N Desborough, Kettering, Garden Goods Consumer Products Co 284737 NN14 2SR 479740 Unspecified Works Or 13 136 W Factory NN14 Industrial Features 284405 Factories Great Bear Unit 1, Bear Way, 480094 Transport, Storage and 14 140 E Distribution Desborough, Kettering, Distribution and Haulage 284346 Delivery Ltd NN14 2WB 480064 Unspecified Works Or 15 167 N Works NN14 Industrial Features 284775 Factories Povoas Stoke Albany Road, 479814 Rubber, Silicones and 16 183 NW Packaging Desborough, Kettering, Industrial Products 284640 Plastics Ltd NN14 2SR Electricity 480099 Infrastructure and 17 212 E NN14 Electrical Features Sub Station 284156 Facilities
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 26 Distance Directio ID Company NGR Address Activity Category (m) n Electricity 479898 Infrastructure and 18 222 S NN14 Electrical Features Sub Station 283991 Facilities
4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites
Records of petrol or fuel sites within 500m of the study site: 0
Database searched and no data found.
4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables
This dataset identifies the high voltage electricity transmission lines running between generating power plants and electricity substations. The dataset does not include the electricity distribution network (smaller, lower voltage cables distributing power from substations to the local user network). This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors.
Records of National Grid high voltage underground electricity transmission cables within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found.
4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines
This dataset identifies high-pressure, large diameter pipelines which carry gas between gas terminals, power stations, compressors and storage facilities. The dataset does not include the Local Transmission System (LTS) which supplies gas directly into homes and businesses. This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors.
Records of National Grid high pressure gas transmission pipelines within 500m of the study site: 0
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 27 5. Geology
5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground
The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.
Lex Code Description Rock Type WGR-OPEN WORKED GROUND (UNDIVIDED) VOID
5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology
The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.
Lex Code Description Rock Type TILMP TILL, MID PLEISTOCENE DIAMICTON
5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology
The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.
Lex Code Description Rock Type SANDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND GRF-SDSM GRANTHAM FORMATION MUDSTONE NS-FEOOL NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION IRONSTONE, OOIDAL WHM-MDST WHITBY MUDSTONE FORMATION MUDSTONE SANDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND GRF-SDSM GRANTHAM FORMATION MUDSTONE
(Derived from the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain)
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 28 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 29 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 30 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 31 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 32 6e. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 33 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology
6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits
Are there records of strata classification within the superficial geology at or in proximity to the property? Yes
From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the Groundsure Enviroinsight User Guide.
The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Superficial Geology Map (6a):
Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 1 0 On Site general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 2 0 On Site general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 3 285 SE general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 4 388 N general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 5 389 N general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type
6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits
Are there records of strata classification within the bedrock geology at or in proximity to the property?Yes
From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the Groundsure Enviroinsight User Guide.
The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b):
Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 1 0 On Site Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 2 0 On Site Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 4 0 On Site general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible 8 0 On Site Unproductive significance for water supply or river base flow
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 34 Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible 9 3 NW Unproductive significance for water supply or river base flow Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 5 35 S general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 6 285 SE general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible 10 388 N Unproductive significance for water supply or river base flow These are rock layers or drift deposits with low permeability that have negligible 11 389 N Unproductive significance for water supply or river base flow
6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences
Are there any Groundwater Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences
Are there any Surface Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences
Are there any Potable Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
6.6 Source Protection Zones
Are there any Source Protection Zones within 500m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 35 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer
Are there any Source Protection Zones within the Confined Aquifer within 500m of the study site? No
Historically, Source Protection Zone maps have been focused on regulation of activities which occur at or near the ground surface, such as prevention of point source pollution and bacterial contamination of water supplies. Sources in confined aquifers were often considered to be protected from these surface pressures due to the presence of a low permeability confining layer (e.g. glacial till, clay). The increased interest in subsurface activities such as onshore oil and gas exploration, ground source heating and cooling requires protection zones for confined sources to be marked on SPZ maps where this has not already been done.
Database searched and no data found.
6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential
Is there any Environment Agency information on groundwater vulnerability and soil leaching potential within 500m of the study site? Yes
Distance Direction Classification Soil Vulnerability Category Description (m) Minor Aquifer/Intermediate Leaching Soils which can possibly transmit a 0 On Site I1 Potential wide range of pollutants. Soil information for urban areas and restored mineral workings. These Minor Aquifer/High Leaching 40 SE HU soils are therefore assumed to be Potential highly permeable in the absence of site-specific information.
6.9 River Quality
Is there any Environment Agency information on river quality within 1500m of the study site? No
6.9.1 Biological Quality:
Database searched and no data found.
6.9.2 Chemical Quality:
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 36 6.10 Detailed River Network
Are there any Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
6.11 Surface Water Features
Are there any surface water features within 250m of the study site? Yes
The following surface water records are not represented on mapping:
Distance (m) Direction 37 S
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 37 7a. Environment Agency Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea)
NW N NE
W E
SE SW S
© Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 38 7b. Environment Agency Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 39 7 Flooding
7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding
Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency Zone 2 floodplain? No
Environment Agency Zone 2 floodplains estimate the annual probability of flooding as between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 100 (1%) from rivers and between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 200 (0.5%) from the sea. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning:
Database searched and no data found.
7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding
Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency Zone 3 floodplain? No
Zone 3 shows the extent of a river flood with a 1 in 100 (1%) or greater chance of occurring in any year or a sea flood with a 1 in 200 (0.5%) or greater chance of occurring in any year. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning.
Database searched and no data found.
7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating
What is the highest risk of flooding onsite? Very Low
The Environment Agency RoFRaS database provides an indication of river and coastal flood risk at a national level on a 50m grid with the flood rating at the centre of the grid calculated and given above. The data considers the probability that the flood defences will overtop or breach by considering their location, type, condition and standard of protection.
RoFRaS data for the study site indicates the property is in an area with a Very Low (less than 1 in 1000) chance of flooding in any given year.
7.4 Flood Defences
Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No Database searched and no data found.
7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences
Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 40 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage
Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the study site? No
7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas
7.7.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site? Yes
Does this relate to Clearwater Flooding or Superficial Deposits Flooding? Superficial Deposits Flooding
Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers which overlie unproductive aquifers (Superficial Deposits Flooding), or with unconfined aquifers (Clearwater Flooding).
7.7.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions?
Potential at Surface Where potential for groundwater flooding to occur at surface is indicated, this means that given the geological conditions in the area groundwater flooding hazard should be considered in all land-use planning decisions. It is recommended that other relevant information e.g. records of previous incidence of groundwater flooding, rainfall, property type, and land drainage information be investigated in order to establish relative, but not absolute, risk of groundwater flooding.
7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas
What is the British Geological Survey confidence rating in this result? Moderate
Notes: Groundwater flooding is defined as the emergence of groundwater at the ground surface or the rising of groundwater into man-made ground under conditions where the normal range of groundwater levels is exceeded.
The confidence rating is on a threefold scale - Low, Moderate and High. This provides a relative indication of the BGS confidence in the accuracy of the susceptibility result for groundwater flooding. This is based on the amount and precision of the information used in the assessment. In areas with a relatively lower level of confidence the susceptibility result should be treated with more caution. In other areas with higher levels of confidence the susceptibility result can be used with more confidence.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 41 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map
NW N NE
W E
SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Ordnance Survey license 100035207.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 42 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites
Presence of Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites within 2000m of the study site? Yes
8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:
3
The following Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) records provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:
Distance ID Direction SSSI Name Data Source (m) Not 1392 N Stoke & Bowd Lane Woods Natural England shown Not 1412 N Stoke & Bowd Lane Woods Natural England shown Not 1900 N Stoke & Bowd Lane Woods Natural England shown
8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 43 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site:
7
The following records of Designated Ancient Woodland provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:
Distance ID Direction Ancient Woodland Name Data Source (m) 9 458 N UNKNOWN Ancient Replanted Woodland Ancient and Semi-Natural 10 645 N UNKNOWN Woodland Not Ancient and Semi-Natural 1485 NW UNKNOWN shown Woodland Not 1529 N UNKNOWN Ancient Replanted Woodland shown Ancient and Semi-Natural 13 1649 NW UNKNOWN Woodland Not Ancient and Semi-Natural 1891 E UNKNOWN shown Woodland Not Ancient and Semi-Natural 1900 N UNKNOWN shown Woodland
8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:
1
The following Local Nature Reserve (LNR) records provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:
Distance ID Direction LNR Name Data Source (m) Not 1953 SE Tailby Meadow Natural England shown
8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 44 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:
0
Database searched and no data found.
8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:
4
The following Nitrate Vulnerable Zone records produced by DEFRA are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:
Distance ID Direction NVZ Name Data Source (m)
5 0 On Site Existing DEFRA 6 0 On Site Existing DEFRA 7 74 NW Existing DEFRA 8 654 N Existing DEFRA
8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site:
0 Database searched and no data found.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 45 9. Natural Hazards Findings
9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data
BGS GeoSure Data has been searched to 50m. The data is included in tabular format. If you require further information on geology and ground stability, please obtain a Groundsure GeoInsight, available from our website. The following information has been found:
9.1.1 Shrink Swell
What is the maximum Shrink-Swell** hazard rating identified on the study site? Low
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard Ground conditions predominantly medium plasticity. Do not plant trees with high soil moisture demands near to buildings. For new build, consideration should be given to advice published by the National House Building Council (NHBC) and the Building Research Establishment (BRE). There is a possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential shrink-swell problems. For existing property, there is a possible increase in insurance risk, especially during droughts or where vegetation with high moisture demands is present.
9.1.2 Landslides
What is the maximum Landslide* hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.
9.1.3 Soluble Rocks
What is the maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Negligible
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks.
* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 46 9.1.4 Compressible Ground
What is the maximum Compressible Ground* hazard rating identified on the study site? Negligible
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits.
9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks
What is the maximum Collapsible Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits.
9.1.6 Running Sand
What is the maximum Running Sand** hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low
The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:
Hazard Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required, to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand.
9.2 Radon
9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas
Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The property is in a Radon Affected Area, as between 5 and 10% of properties are above the Action Level.
* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 47 9.2.2 Radon Protection
Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? Basic radon protective measures are necessary.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 48 10. Mining
10.1 Coal Mining
Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No
Database searched and no data found.
10.2 Non-Coal Mining
Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study site boundary? No
Database searched and no data found.
10.3 Brine Affected Areas
Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study site? No Guidance: No Guidance Required.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 49 Contact Details
EmapSite Telephone: 0118 9736883 [email protected]
British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email: Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries: [email protected] Environment Agency National Customer Contact Centre, PO Box 544 Rotherham, S60 1BY Tel: 08708 506 506 Web:www.environment-agency.gov.uk Email:[email protected]
Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG www.gov.uk/phe Email:[email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000
The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0345 7626 848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk
Ordnance Survey Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS Tel: 08456 050505
Local Authority Authority: Kettering Borough Council Phone: 01536 410 333 Web: http://www.kettering.gov.uk/ Address: Municipal Offices, Bowling Green Road, Kettering, Gemapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 50 Acknowledgements: Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar Site, Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation data is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data. PointX © Database Right/Copyright, Thomson Directories Limited © Copyright Link Interchange Network Limited © Database Right/Copyright and Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Groundsure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature.
Report Reference: EMS-358742_481519 Client Reference: EMS_358742_481519 51 2.4 The Client acknowledges that terms and conditions appearing on a Client’s Standard Terms and Conditions order form, printed stationery or other communication, or any terms or conditions implied by custom, practice or course of dealing shall be of no effect, 1 Definitions and that this Contract shall prevail over all others in relation to the Order. 2.5 If the Client or Beneficiary requests insurance in conjunction with or as a In these terms and conditions unless the context otherwise requires: result of the Services, Groundsure shall use reasonable endeavours to “Beneficiary” means the person or entity for whose benefit the Client has recommend such insurance, but makes no warranty that such insurance shall obtained the Services. be available from insurers or that it will be offered on reasonable terms. Any “Client” means the party or parties entering into a Contract with Groundsure. insurance purchased by the Client or Beneficiary shall be subject solely to the terms of the policy issued by insurers and Groundsure will have no liability “Commercial” means any building or property which is not Residential. therefor. In addition you acknowledge and agree that Groundsure does not act “Confidential Information” means the contents of this Contract and all as an agent or broker for any insurance providers. The Client should take (and information received from the Client as a result of, or in connection with, this ensure that the Beneficiary takes) independent advice to ensure that the Contract other than insurance policy requested or offered is suitable for its requirements. (i) information which the Client can prove was rightfully in its 2.6 Groundsure's quotations or proposals are valid for a period of 30 days only possession prior to disclosure by Groundsure and unless an alternative period of time is explicitly stipulated by Groundsure. Groundsure reserves the right to withdraw any quotation or proposal at any (ii) any information which is in the public domain (other than time before an Order is accepted by Groundsure. Groundsure's acceptance of by virtue of a breach of this Contract). an Order shall be binding only when made in writing and signed by “Support Services” means Support Services provided by Groundsure including, Groundsure's authorised representative or when accepted through the Order without limitation, interpreting third party and in-house environmental data, Website. providing environmental support advice, undertaking environmental audits and assessments, Site investigation, Site monitoring and related items. 3 The Client’s obligations “Contract” means the contract between Groundsure and the Client for the 3.1The Client shall comply with the terms of this Contract and provision of the Services, and which shall incorporate these terms and conditions, the Order, and the relevant User Guide. (i) procure that the Beneficiary or any third party relying on the Services complies with and acts as if it is bound by the Contract and “Third Party Data Provider” means any third party providing Third Party Content to Groundsure. (ii) be liable to Groundsure for the acts and omissions of the Beneficiary or any third party relying on the Services as if such acts and “Data Reports” means reports comprising factual data with no accompanying omissions were those of the Client. interpretation. 3.2 The Client shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the Services are “Fees” has the meaning set out in clause 5.1. appropriate and suitable for its and/or the Beneficiary’s needs. “Groundsure” means Groundsure Limited, a company registered in England 3.3 The Client shall supply to Groundsure as soon as practicable and without and Wales under number 03421028. charge all requisite information (and the Client warrants that such information “Groundsure Materials” means all materials prepared by Groundsure and is accurate, complete and appropriate), including without limitation any provided as part of the Services, including but not limited to Third Party environmental information relating to the Site and shall give such assistance as Content, Data Reports, Mapping, and Risk Screening Reports. Groundsure shall reasonably require in the provision of the Services including, without limitation, access to the Site, facilities and equipment. “Intellectual Property” means any patent, copyright, design rights, trade or service mark, moral rights, data protection rights, know-how or trade mark in 3.4 Where the Client’s approval or decision is required to enable Groundsure to each case whether registered or not and including applications for the same or carry out work in order to provide the Services, such approval or decision shall any other rights of a similar nature anywhere in the world. be given or procured in reasonable time and so as not to delay or disrupt the performance of the Services. “Mapping” means a map, map data or a combination of historical maps of various ages, time periods and scales. 3.5 Save as expressly permitted by this Contract the Client shall not, and shall procure that the Beneficiary shall not, re-sell, alter, add to, or amend the “Order” means an electronic, written or other order form submitted by the Groundsure Materials, or use the Groundsure Materials in a manner for which Client requesting Services from Groundsure in respect of a specified Site. they were not intended. The Client may make the Groundsure Materials “Ordnance Survey” means the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and available to a third party who is considering acquiring some or all of, or Skills, acting through Ordnance Survey, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 providing funding in relation to, the Site, but such third party cannot rely on the 0AS, UK. same unless expressly permitted under clause 4. “Order Website” means the online platform through which Orders may be 3.6 The Client is responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of its user name placed by the Client and accepted by Groundsure. and password if using the Order Website and the Client acknowledges that Groundsure accepts no liability of any kind for any loss or damage suffered by “Report” means a Risk Screening Report or Data Report for Commercial or the Client as a consequence of using the Order Website. Residential property. “Residential” means any building or property used as or intended to be used as 4 Reliance a single dwelling. 4.1The Client acknowledges that the Services provided by Groundsure consist “Risk Screening Report” means a risk screening report comprising factual data of the presentation and analysis of Third Party Content and other content and with an accompanying interpretation by Groundsure. that information obtained from a Third Party Data Provider cannot be “Services” means any Report, Mapping and/or Support Services which guaranteed or warranted by Groundsure to be reliable. Groundsure has agreed to provide by accepting an Order pursuant to clause 4.2 In respect of Data Reports, Mapping and Risk Screening Reports, the 2.6. following classes of person and no other are entitled to rely on their contents; "Site" means the area of land in respect of which the Client has requested (i) the Beneficiary, Groundsure to provide the Services. (ii) the Beneficiary's professional advisers, (iii) any person “Third Party Content” means data, database information or other information providing funding to the Beneficiary in relation to the Site (whether directly or which is provided to Groundsure by a Third Party Data Provider. as part of a lending syndicate), "User Guide" means the user guide, as amended from time to time, available (iv) the first purchaser or first tenant of the Site, and upon request from Groundsure and on the website (www.Groundsure.com) and forming part of this Contract. (v) the professional advisers and lenders of the first purchaser or tenant of the Site. 2 Scope of Services, terms and conditions, requests for 4.3 In respect of Support Services, only the Client, Beneficiary and parties insurance and quotations expressly named in a Report and no other parties are entitled to rely on its contents. 2.1 Groundsure agrees to provide the Services in accordance with the Contract. 4.4 Save as set out in clauses 4.2 and 4.3 and unless otherwise expressly agreed 2.2 Groundsure shall exercise reasonable skill and care in the provision of the in writing, no other person or entity of any kind is entitled to rely on any Services. Services or Report issued or provided by Groundsure. Any party considering 2.3 Subject to clause 7.3 the Client acknowledges that it has not relied on any such Reports and Services does so at their own risk. statement or representation made by or on behalf of Groundsure which is not set out and expressly agreed in writing in the Contract and all such statements 5 Fees and Disbursements and representations are hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. 5.1Groundsure shall charge and the Client shall pay fees at the rate and frequency specified in the written proposal, Order Website or Order subcontractors; acknowledgement form, plus (in the case of Support Services) all proper (ii) any use made of the Reports, Services, Materials or any disbursements incurred by Groundsure. The Client shall in addition pay all value part of them; and added tax or other tax payable on such fees and disbursements in relation to the provision of the Services (together “Fees”). (iii) any representation, statement or tortious act or omission (including negligence) arising under or in connection with the Contract. 5.2 The Client shall pay all outstanding Fees to Groundsure in full without deduction, counterclaim or set off within 30 days of the date of Groundsure’s 7.2 All warranties, conditions and other terms implied by statute or common invoice or such other period as may be agreed in writing between Groundsure law are, to the fullest extent permitted by law, excluded from the Contract. and the Client ("Payment Date"). Interest on late payments will accrue on a 7.3 Nothing in the Contract limits or excludes the liability of the Supplier for daily basis from the Payment Date until the date of payment (whether before death or personal injury resulting from negligence, or for any damage or or after judgment) at the rate of 8% per annum. liability incurred by the Client or Beneficiary as a result of fraud or fraudulent 5.3 The Client shall be deemed to have agreed the amount of any invoice unless misrepresentation. an objection is made in writing within 28 days of the date of the invoice. As 7.4 Groundsure shall not be liable for soon as reasonably practicable after being notified of an objection, without prejudice to clause 5.2 a member of Groundsure’s management team will (i) loss of profits; contact the Client and the parties shall then use all reasonable endeavours to (ii) loss of business; resolve the dispute within 15 days. (iii) depletion of goodwill and/or similar losses; 6 Intellectual Property and Confidentiality (iv) loss of anticipated savings; 6.1 Subject to (v) loss of goods; (i) full payment of all relevant Fees and (vi) loss of contract; (ii) compliance with this Contract, the Client is granted (and is (vii) loss of use; permitted to sub-licence to the Beneficiary) a royalty-free, worldwide, non- (viii) loss or corruption of data or information; assignable and (save to the extent set out in this Contract) non-transferable licence to make use of the Groundsure Materials. (ix) business interruption; 6.2 All Intellectual Property in the Groundsure Materials are and shall remain (x) any kind of special, indirect, consequential or pure owned by Groundsure or Groundsure's licensors (including without limitation economic loss, costs, damages, charges or expenses; the Third Party Data Providers) the Client acknowledges, and shall procure (xi) loss or damage that arise as a result of the use of all or acknowledgement by the Beneficiary of, such ownership. Nothing in this part of the Groundsure Materials in breach of the Contract; Contract purports to transfer or assign any rights to the Client or the Beneficiary in respect of such Intellectual Property. (xii) loss or damage arising as a result of any error, omission or inaccuracy in any part of the Groundsure Materials where such error, omission 6.3 Third Party Data Providers may enforce any breach of clauses 6.1 and 6.2 or inaccuracy is caused by any Third Party Content or any reasonable against the Client or Beneficiary. interpretation of Third Party Content; 6.4 The Client shall, and shall procure that any recipients of the Groundsure (xiii) loss or damage to a computer, software, modem, Materials shall: telephone or other property; and (i) not remove, suppress or modify any trade mark, copyright (xiv) loss or damage caused by a delay or loss of use of or other proprietary marking belonging to Groundsure or any third party from Groundsure’s internet ordering service. the Services; 7.5 Groundsure’s total liability in relation to or under the Contract shall be (ii) use the information obtained as part of the Services in limited to £10 million for any claim or claims. respect of the subject Site only, and shall not store or reuse any information obtained as part of the Services provided in respect of adjacent or nearby sites; 7.6 Groundsure shall procure that the Beneficiary shall be bound by limitations and exclusions of liability in favour of Groundsure which accord with those (iii) not create any product or report which is derived directly detailed in clauses 7.4 and 7.5 (subject to clause 7.3) in respect of all claims or indirectly from the Services (save that those acting in a professional capacity which the Beneficiary may bring against Groundsure in relation to the Services to the Beneficiary may provide advice based upon the Services); or other matters arising pursuant to the Contract. (iv) not combine the Services with or incorporate such Services into any other information data or service; 8 Groundsure’s right to suspend or terminate (v) not reformat or otherwise change (whether by 8.1 If Groundsure reasonably believes that the Client or Beneficiary has not modification, addition or enhancement), the Services (save that those acting for provided the information or assistance required to enable the proper provision the Beneficiary in a professional capacity shall not be in breach of this clause of the Services, Groundsure shall be entitled to suspend all further performance 6.4(v) where such reformatting is in the normal course of providing advice of the Services until such time as any such deficiency has been made good. based upon the Services); 8.2 Groundsure shall be entitled to terminate the Contract immediately on (vi) where a Report and/or Mapping contains material written notice in the event that: belonging to Ordnance Survey, acknowledge and agree that such content is protected by Crown Copyright and shall not use such content for any purpose (i) the Client fails to pay any sum due to Groundsure within outside of receiving the Services; and 30 days of the Payment Date; or (vii) not copy in whole or in part by any means any map prints (ii) the Client (being an individual) has a bankruptcy order or run-on copies containing content belonging to Ordnance Survey (other than made against him or (being a company) shall enter into liquidation whether that contained within Ordnance Survey’s OS Street Map) without first being in compulsory or voluntary or have an administration order made against it or if a possession of a valid Paper Map Copying Licence from Ordnance Survey, receiver shall be appointed over the whole or any part of its property assets or undertaking or if the Client is struck off the Register of Companies or dissolved; 6.5 Notwithstanding clause 6.4, the Client may make reasonable use of the or Groundsure Materials in order to advise the Beneficiary in a professional capacity. However, Groundsure shall have no liability in respect of any advice, (iii) the Client being a company is unable to pay its debts opinion or report given or provided to Beneficiaries by the Client. within the meaning of Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or being an individual appears unable to pay his debts within the meaning of Section 268 of 6.6 The Client shall procure that any person to whom the Services are made the Insolvency Act 1986 or if the Client shall enter into a composition or available shall notify Groundsure of any request or requirement to disclose, arrangement with the Client’s creditors or shall suffer distress or execution to publish or disseminate any information contained in the Services in accordance be levied on his goods; or with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 or any associated legislation or regulations in force from time (iv) the Client or the Beneficiary breaches any term of the to time. Contract (including, but not limited to, the obligations in clause 4) which is incapable of remedy or if remediable, is not remedied within five days of notice of the breach. 7.Liability: Particular Attention Should Be Paid To This Clause 9. Client’s Right to Terminate and Suspend 7.1 This Clause 7 sets out the entire liability of Groundsure, including any 9.1 Subject to clause 10.1, the Client may at any time upon written notice liability for the acts or omissions of its employees, agents, consultants, terminate or suspend the provision of all or any of the Services. subcontractors and Third Party Content, in respect of: 9.2 In any event, where the Client is a consumer (and not a business) he/she (i) any breach of contract, including any deliberate breach of hereby expressly acknowledges and agrees that: the Contract by Groundsure or its employees, agents or (i) the supply of Services under this Contract (and therefore 12.8 Any notice provided shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly the performance of this Contract) commences immediately upon Groundsure's given if delivered by hand or sent by first class post, facsimile or by email to the acceptance of the Order; and address, facsimile number or email address of the relevant party as may have been notified by each party to the other for such purpose or in the absence of (ii) the Reports and/or Mapping provided under this Contract such notification the last known address. are 12.9 Such notice shall be deemed to have been received on the day of delivery if (a) supplied to the Client's specification(s) and in any event delivered by hand, facsimile or email (save to the extent such day is not a (b) by their nature cannot be returned. working day where it shall be deemed to have been delivered on the next working day) and on the second working day after the day of posting if sent by 10 Consequences of Withdrawal, Termination or first class post. Suspension 12.10 The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all previous arrangements between the parties relating to the 10.1 Upon termination of the Contract: subject matter hereof. (i) Groundsure shall take steps to bring to an end the Services 12.11 Each of the provisions of the Contract is severable and distinct from the in an orderly manner, vacate any Site with all reasonable speed and shall deliver others and if one or more provisions is or should become invalid, illegal or to the Client and/or Beneficiary any property of the Client and/or Beneficiary in unenforceable, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall Groundsure’s possession or control; and not in any way be tainted or impaired. (ii) the Client shall pay to Groundsure all and any Fees 12.12 This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with payable in respect of the performance of the Services up to the date of English law and any proceedings arising out of or connected with this Contract termination or suspension. In respect of any Support Services provided, the shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. Client shall also pay Groundsure any additional costs incurred in relation to the termination or suspension of the Contract. 12.13 Groundsure is an executive member of the Council of Property Search Organisation (CoPSO) and has signed up to the Search Code administered by 11 Anti-Bribery the Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB). All Risk Screening Reports shall be supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Search Code. 11.1 The Client warrants that it shall: 12.14 If the Client or Beneficiary has a complaint about the Services, written (i) comply with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations notice should be given to the Compliance Officer at Groundsure who will relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption including but not limited to the respond in a timely manner. In the event you are not satisfied with Bribery Act 2010; Groundsure’s complaints handling process or you are unable to resolve the complaint, at your discretion you may refer the complaint to The Property (ii) comply with such of Groundsure's anti-bribery and anti- Ombudsman Scheme at the following URL/email: website www.tpos.co.uk or corruption policies as are notified to the Client from time to time; and email: [email protected] (iii) promptly report to Groundsure any request or demand for 12.15 The Client agrees that it shall, and shall procure that each Beneficiary any undue financial or other advantage of any kind received by or on behalf of shall, treat in confidence all Confidential Information and shall not, and shall the Client in connection with the performance of this Contract. procure that each Beneficiary shall not (i) disclose any Confidential Information 11.2 Breach of this Clause 11 shall be deemed a material breach of this to any third party other than in accordance with the terms of this Contract; and Contract. (ii) use Confidential Information for a purpose other than the exercise of its rights and obligations under this Contract. Subject to clause 6.6, nothing shall 12 General prevent the Client or any Beneficiary from disclosing Confidential Information to the extent required by law. © Groundsure Limited June 2013 12.1 The Mapping contained in the Services is protected by Crown copyright and must not be used for any purpose other than as part of the Services or as specifically provided in the Contract. 12.2 The Client shall be permitted to make one copy only of each Report or Mapping Order. Thereafter the Client shall be entitled to make unlimited copies of the Report or Mapping Order only in accordance with an Ordnance Survey paper map copy license available through Groundsure. 12.3 Groundsure reserves the right to amend or vary this Contract. No amendment or variation to this Contract shall be valid unless signed by an authorised representative of Groundsure. 12.4 No failure on the part of Groundsure to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right, power or provision under this Contract shall operate as a waiver thereof. 12.5 Save as expressly provided in this Contract, no person other than the persons set out therein shall have any right under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any terms of the Contract. 12.6 The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) or BIS’ successor body, as the case may be, acting through Ordnance Survey may enforce a breach of clause 6.4(vi) and clause 6.4(vii) of these terms and conditions against the Client in accordance with the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. 12.7 Groundsure shall not be liable to the Client if the provision of the Services is delayed or prevented by one or more of the following circumstances: (i) the Client or Beneficiary’s failure to provide facilities, access or information; (ii) fire, storm, flood, tempest or epidemic; (iii) Acts of God or the public enemy; (iv) riot, civil commotion or war; (v) strikes, labour disputes or industrial action; (vi) acts or regulations of any governmental or other agency; (vii) suspension or delay of services at public registries by Third Party Data Providers; (viii) changes in law; or (ix) any other reason beyond Groundsure’s reasonable control. In the event that Groundsure is prevented from performing the Services (or any part thereof) in accordance with this clause 12.6 for a period of not less than 30 days then Groundsure shall be entitled to terminate this Contract immediately on written notice to the Client.
APPENDIX C Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough Borehole Log
AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership BH1B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Date Hole Diameter (mm) Ground Level Logged By Checked By Scale 10/05/2016 139.213m AOD FHJ AS 1:50 150mm to 4.79m Method Depth (m) Co-ordinates Ground Slope Cable Percussion 4.79 479914.31 284344.76
Casing Date Depth Sample PID SPT N O.D Depth Stand Depth & PL/ LL NMC Description of Strata Legend Diameter (m) Type (ppm) or Cu Level (m) Pipe 0.10 D Grass over dark brown gravelly SAND with rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 138.71 0.50 Firm to stiff closely fissured brown and 1.00 D grey mottled gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) 1.20 SPT 24N D 24/300 1.50
1.80 D
From 2.00m bgl: dark brown with frequent 2.20-2.65 U(50) 199 21/41 17.00 fine to coarse sand sized selenite 2.20 crystals. 2.65 D 2.80 D From 2.80m bgl: sandy with rare shell fragments. Gravel is fine to medium 3.20 SPT 38N subangular to angular limestone. 3.20-3.65 D 38/300
3.80 D 3.90-4.30 U(65) 3.90
4.40 D From 4.40m bgl: soft and mottled 134.76 4.45 4.45 D 134.61 4.60 4.60-4.75 D brown-grey. 50/20 134.42 4.79 4.75 SPT(C) Yellow-brown fine to coarse SAND with occasional pockets of soft grey-brown clay. (NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION) Extremely weak orange-brown IRONSTONE recovered as sandy fine to coarse subangular to angular gravel. (NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION) End of Borehole at 4.79 m
GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Hand dug service inspection pit excavated to 1.20m bgl. Chiselling from 4.60m to 4.75m bgl (30 mins). 50mm diameter standpipe installed to 4.00m Struck Cased 20 mins Sealed Date Remarks bgl, plain pipe ground level to 1.00m bgl with bentonite seal and No Groundwater Encountered slotted pipe 1.00m to 4.00m bgl with gravel pack. Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough Borehole Log
AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership BH2B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Date Hole Diameter (mm) Ground Level Logged By Checked By Scale 09/05/2016 138.061m AOD FHJ AS 1:50 150mm to 4.60m Method Depth (m) Co-ordinates Ground Slope Cable Percussion 4.60 479885.74 284314.55
Casing Date Depth Sample PID SPT N O.D Depth Stand Depth & PL/ LL NMC Description of Strata Legend Diameter (m) Type (ppm) or Cu Level (m) Pipe 0.10 D Grass over stiff dark brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint. (DISTURBED/REWORKED 0.50 D GROUND) 137.56 0.50 Firm brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to 1.00 D coarse subangular to angular flint, chalk and occasional ironstone. (GLACIAL TILL) 1.20 SPT 14N From 1.00m bgl: grey-brown and slightly 1.20-1.65 D 14/300 gravelly. Gravel is fine to coarse 1.50 subrounded quartzite, chalk and limestone. 1.80 D
2.20-2.65 U(55) 150 20/41 17.00 2.20
2.65 D 2.80 D At 2.65m bgl: stiff. From 2.80m bgl: dark grey.
3.20 SPT 25N 134.86 3.20 3.20-3.65 D 25/300 Stiff closely fissured brown and grey gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular chalk and siltstone. 3.80 D (GLACIAL TILL) 134.26 3.80 4.00 SPT 50/170 Stiff orange-brown slightly gravelly CLAY. 134.16 3.90 4.00-4.32 D Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to 4.32-4.55 D angular ironstone. (NORTHAMPTON SAND 133.74 4.32 FORMATION) 4.55 SPT(C) 50/30 133.46 4.60 Very dense yellow-brown fine to coarse SAND with occasional pockets of soft grey clay. (NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION) Extremely weak orange-brown IRONSTONE recovered as sandy fine to coarse subangular to angular gravel. (NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION) End of Borehole at 4.60 m
GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Hand dug service inspection pit excavated to 1.20m bgl. Chiselling from 4.32m to 4.55m bgl (30 mins). 50mm diameter standpipe installed to 4.50m Struck Cased 20 mins Sealed Date Remarks bgl, plain pipe ground level to 2.00m bgl with bentonite seal and No Groundwater Encountered slotted pipe 2.00m to 4.50m bgl with gravel pack. Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough Borehole Log
AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership BH3B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Date Hole Diameter (mm) Ground Level Logged By Checked By Scale 09/05/2016 138.076m AOD FHJ AS 1:50 150mm to 3.68m Method Depth (m) Co-ordinates Ground Slope Cable Percussion 3.68 479902.84 284276.42
Casing Date Depth Sample PID SPT N O.D Depth Stand Depth & PL/ LL NMC Description of Strata Legend Diameter (m) Type (ppm) or Cu Level (m) Pipe 0.10 D Grass over dark brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND with rootlets. 137.78 0.30 Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to 0.50 D angular flint. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 137.28 0.80 0.90 D Orange-brown clayey GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. 1.20-1.65 U(19) 19/51 (MADE GROUND) 1.20 1.50 Firm to stiff closely fissured grey-brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse 1.80 D subrounded chalk and occasional subangular to angular flint. (GLACIAL TILL) 2.20 SPT 14N 2.20-2.65 D 14/300
2.80 D 135.28 2.80 Stiff closely fissured brown and 3.00 SPT 50/245 orange-brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine 135.08 3.00 3.00-3.41 D to coarse subangular to angular limestone. 3.40-3.65 D (GLACIAL TILL) Very dense yellow-brown fine to coarse 3.65 SPT(C) 50/30 134.40 3.68 SAND. (NORTHAMPTON SAND FORMATION) From 3.40m bgl: slightly gravelly. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. End of Borehole at 3.68 m
GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Hand dug service inspection pit excavated to 1.20m bgl. Chiselling from 3.40m to 3.65m bgl (30 mins). 50mm diameter standpipe installed to 3.00m Struck Cased 20 mins Sealed Date Remarks bgl, plain pipe ground level to 1.00m bgl with bentonite seal and No Groundwater Encountered slotted pipe 1.00m to 3.00m bgl with gravel pack.
Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP1B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 10/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.70 0.70 0 3.60 138.54m AOD 479880.66 284334.72
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over firm brown gravelly CLAY with M rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint and subrounded chalk. 138.34 0.20 (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 0.40 ES Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to 0.50 V 90 coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) D
From 0.90m bgl: blue-grey.
1.30 D
1.50 P 150 From 1.50m bgl: very stiff. M From 1.60m to 1.80m bgl: with frequent fine to 1.70 D coarse subangular to angular mudstone gravel.
VH From 2.30m bgl: dark brown and dark blue-grey. 2.40 P 150 2.50 D
3.20 P 125
135.14 3.40 Very stiff dark blue-grey slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to 3.60 P 200 angular limestone and subrounded chalk. 134.94 3.60 D (GLACIAL TILL) End of Trial Pit at 3.60 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP2B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 10/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.80 0.70 0 3.00 137.09m AOD 479866.30 284248.82
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over firm brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is M fine to coarse subangular to angular flint 0.20 ES and occasional chalk. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 136.79 0.30 Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) 0.60 V 105 0.70 D
From 0.90m bgl: blue-grey. 1.00 V 125 M 1.20 D 18/38 18.0
135.29 1.80 Stiff orange-brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse 2.00 V 80 subangular to angular flint. (GLACIAL TILL) 2.10 D
M
2.70 V 85 From 2.70m bgl: occasional gravel. VH
3.00 V 90 134.09 3.00 D End of Trial Pit at 3.00 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP3B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 10/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.80 0.70 0 3.10 138.00m AOD 479894.95 284253.47
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over soft dark brown gravelly CLAY with M rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint and occasional subrounded chalk and rare tarmacadam. 137.70 0.30 (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 0.40 ES M Firm orange-brown and grey-blue gravelly CLAY. 137.50 0.50 Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk, 0.60 V 70 subangular to angular ironstone and occasional brick and tile fragments. (MADE GROUND) H 0.80 D Firm brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (MADE GROUND) 137.00 1.00 Firm orange-brown gravelly slightly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to 1.20 D angular ironstone. (GLACIAL TILL) M
136.40 1.60 Stiff blue-grey gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk and occasional subangular to angular flint. (GLACIAL TILL)
2.00 V 85 D H
VH
From 2.90m bgl: with occasional sand infilled 3.00 D laminations. 3.10 V 75 134.90 3.10 End of Trial Pit at 3.10 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP4B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 10/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.70 0.70 0 2.90 139.75m AOD 479896.40 284393.67
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over firm to stiff brown gravelly CLAY. 0.10 ES M Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint, occasional chalk and occasional brick 139.55 0.20 fragments. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) Stiff closely fissured brown and brown-grey 0.50 V 130 mottled gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to D medium subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) 139.05 0.70 Stiff blue-grey gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk with occasional iron staining and rare subangular to angular 1.00 V 110 18/43 19.0 M flint. (GLACIAL TILL) D From 0.90m bgl: blue-grey and brown mottled.
1.70 P 225 H 138.05 1.70 Very stiff blue-grey gravelly CLAY with 1.80 D occasional iron staining. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk and subangular to H angular flint. (GLACIAL TILL) Between 1.80m and 2.00m bgl: pocket of orange-brown fine to medium sand in north of pit. From 2.00m bgl: with rare fine to coarse subrounded to subangular ironstone gravel.
2.60 P 125 D VH
2.90 P 250 136.85 2.90 D End of Trial Pit at 2.90 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP5B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 11/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.80 0.70 0 2.80 139.70m AOD 479929.81 784361.41
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over soft to firm orange-brown slightly M sandy gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse 0.20 ES subangular to angular flint and ironstone, subrounded chalk and with occasional rubber 139.40 0.30 fragments. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) Stiff closely fissured grey-brown and brown mottled gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to 0.60 V 90 coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) D
1.20 P 175 M D From 1.20m bgl: blue-grey and brown. From 1.30m bgl: with occasional cobbles of chalk.
From 1.60m to 1.70m bgl: band of orange-brown sand and gravel in west of pit. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint.
137.60 2.10 Stiff dark brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine H to coarse subangular to angular flint and 2.30 P 150 rare subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) D VH From 2.50m bgl: dark blue-grey and brown mottled with occasional fine to coarse sand 2.70 P 175 sized elongated selenite crystals. D From 2.70m bgl: with rare ammonite fossils. 136.90 2.80 End of Trial Pit at 2.80 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP6B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 11/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.80 0.70 0 2.80 138.49m AOD 479915.90 284310.46
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over soft brown gravelly CLAY with E rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular 0.20 ES to angular flint. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 138.19 0.30 0.40 V 110 Stiff brown and brown-grey mottled gravelly D CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk and subangular to angular flint with occasional pockets of orange-brown fine to medium sand. (MADE GROUND) 0.80 D From 0.70m bgl: blue-grey and brown.
1.00 V 120 At 1.00m bgl: red-brown ceramic pipe-redundant.
137.09 1.40 Stiff dark brown and blue-grey mottled M gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse 1.60 P 125 subangular to angular flint. (GLACIAL TILL) D From 1.40m to1.50m bgl: occasional subrounded chalk gravel.
2.10 P 150 D From 2.10m bgl: very stiff.
2.60 P 150 D 135.79 2.70 2.75 P 250 VH End of Trial Pit at 2.80 m D
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP7B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 11/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 3.10 0.70 0 3.70 138.56m AOD 284335.21 479900.77
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Soft brown gravelly CLAY with rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular flint. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND)
138.11 0.45 Orange-brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to 0.60 D, ES E coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. (MADE GROUND)
137.76 0.80 Stiff brown and brown-grey gravelly CLAY. 0.90 V 110 Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular D flint (GLACIAL TILL)
From 1.10m bgl: blue-grey and brown.
1.30 V 120 D
2.00 V 105 D
M
2.80 P 200 D
H 135.26 3.30 Yellow-brown and white-brown fine to medium SAND with occasional fine to medium subrounded M ironstone gravel. (GLACIAL TILL) 3.60 D From 3.50m bgl: no gravel. 134.86 3.70 End of Trial Pit at 3.70 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP8B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 11/05/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 3.00 0.70 0 1.60 139.59m AOD 479929.72 284361.42
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass over firm brown gravelly CLAY with rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular brick. (DISTURBED/REWORKED M 0.30 ES GROUND)
From 0.40m to 0.50m bgl: frequent brick fragments. 139.09 0.50 0.60 V 130 Stiff closely fissured grey and brown gravelly 0.70 D CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) H
H From 1.30m bgl: dark blue-grey and brown.
1.50 V 125 D 137.99 1.60 End of Trial Pit at 1.60 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit excavated to find extenet of fill material found in TP7. Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP9B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 08/06/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.80 0.70 - 1.60 138.60m AOD 479904.83 284335.21
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Rough grass over orange-brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) M
137.80 0.80 Firm blue-grey and orange-brown slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL)
1.20 V 110 M From 1.20m bgl: stiff.
H
1.60 V 110 137.00 1.60 End of Trial Pit at 1.60 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP10B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 08/06/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 3.30 0.70 - 2.45 137.89m AOD 479900.94 284270.65
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Rough grass over firm to stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk and subangular to angular brick with rare ceramic pipe fragments. (MADE GROUND)
M
136.99 0.90 Orange-brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND. H Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. (MADE GROUND) 136.74 1.15 Stiff dark blue-grey slightly gravelly CLAY. 1.30 V 90 Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. M (GLACIAL TILL)
136.19 1.70 Stiff brown slightly gravelly silty CLAY with occasional pockets of fine to coarse sand. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. 2.00 V 80 (GLACIAL TILL) M
135.44 2.45 End of Trial Pit at 2.45 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP11B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 08/06/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope - - - 1.90 137.94m AOD 479897.40 284251.84
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Rough grass over orange-brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. (DISTURBED/REWORKED GROUND) 137.54 0.40 Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk with occasional brick 0.60 V 100 and wooden fragments. (MADE GROUND)
137.19 0.75 Stiff dark blue gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded chalk. (MADE GROUND)
136.79 1.15 Orange-brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. (MADE GROUND)
136.24 1.70 Stiff blue-grey and dark brown gravelly CLAY. 1.85 V 130 Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded chalk. (GLACIAL TILL) 136.04 1.90 At 1.80m bgl: with pockets of stiff orange-brown gravelly clay. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular ironstone. End of Trial Pit at 1.90 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard Job No. Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Trial Pit Log Desborough AG2456-16 Client: Magnetic Park Partnership TP12B Tel: 02476511822 Fax: 02476697682 Engineer: BCAL Consulting Engineers Sheet 1 of 1 Method Date Logged By Checked By Scale Backhoe excavator 08/06/2016 FHJ JLA 1:25 Length (m) Breadth (m) Orientation Depth (m) Ground Level Co-ordinates Ground Slope 2.00 0.70 - 1.50 140.64m AOD 479946.86 284385.15
Depth SOIL SAMPLES/TESTS PID PL/LL M/C Ease O.D Depth Description of Strata Legend (m) (ppm) % % of Level (m) Type Strength Dig Grass and grey sandy brick and limestone roadstone gravel over brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular to angular limestone quartzite and brick. (MADE GROUND)
0.50 B
M
1.50 B 139.14 1.50 End of Trial Pit at 1.50 m
GROUNDWATER DETAILS: KEY Groundwater not encountered. SAMPLES B = Bulk ES = Amber Glass Jar D = Tub CBR = CBR Test STABILITY OF PIT WALLS: W = Water SPT = Insitu Penetration Test Stable. SHEAR STRENGTH V=Hand Vane P=Hand Penetrometer (kN/m2) GENERAL REMARKS: GROUNDWATER Entry Trial pit backfilled with arisings on completion. Trial pit located in stockpile. Standing Level Ease of Dig E = Easy M = Moderate H = Hard VH = Very Hard APPENDIX D Gas Monitoring Equipment Specification and Accuracy Details
Instrument Specifications
Instrument Atmospheric Pressure Range Temperature Range Flow Range Flow Resolution Borehole Pressure Range Test Time Flow Volume
GFM 430 800 to 1200 mbar+/- 1m bar -10°C to + 40°C -30 to +30 l/hr 0.1l/hr +1000 to - 1000 Pa N/A - Mini Rae 2000 - 0 - 45°C ------20 to + 60°C (Certified to ------Pro Check Tiger 15 to + 45°C)
Instrument Accuracy
Instrument Methane Lower Explosive Limit Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrogen Sulphide Carbon Monoxide
Detection 1500ppm response 30 1000ppm response 0-100% 0-100% 0 -100% 0-25% NA Range secs 30 Secs GFM430 Accuracy 0.1% @10% 3.0% Detection +/- 0.2% @ 5% 1.0% @30% 3.0% +/-4% of LEL Response 40 +/- 0.5% Response @40% 3% @ 100% Response 20 NA Accuracy @ 100% Response 20 secs secs 20 secs 5% of fs 5% of fs Secs Detection 0-99ppm - 0.1ppm 2 sec 100-1999ppm 1.0ppm 2 sec N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Range 2000-10000 ppm 1.0 ppm 2 sec Mini Rae 2000 Detection 0-2000 ppm +/- 2ppm or 10% >2000ppm +/- 20% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Accuracy reading (For Isobutylene 100ppm) Detection N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 ppb - 10,000 ppm N/A N/A Range Pro Check Tiger Detection +/- 1ppb +- 5% of actual displayed accuracy +/- One N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Accuracy digit Response < 2sec
Calibration Frequency Equipment Serial Numbers
GF60 - (3096- 3099) LMSXi - (1629, 1630) Instruments are calibrated annually. GFM430 - (10071, 10072, 10347) Details of the instrument calibration certificates and service records are available if required. Mini Rae 2000 - (110-901200, 110-901321)
Pro Check Tiger - (108308, T-109597, T-109598)
Issue 4 29.04.14 AG-S-07 Ground Gas Monitoring and Flow Results
Project/Site Name Magnetic Park - Site B Date and Time of Monitoring 26/05/2016 Project Number AG2456-16 Phase of Monitoring 1 of 4
Base of Ground Differential Installed Diameter of Flow Range (litres/hr over 3 mins) Methane % v/v Methane % LEL Carbon dioxide % v/v Oxygen % v/v Water level Water Level installation BH No. Level (m Pressure Depth installation (m bgl) (m AOD) check AOD) (pa) (m bgl) (mm) Max Min Avg Peak Steady Peak Steady Peak Steady Min Steady (m bgl) BH1 139.213 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.8 20.9 4.00 50 0.44 138.77 3.97
BH2 138.061 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.7 20.8 4.50 50 DRY DRY 3.85
BH3 138.076 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.9 20.9 3.00 50 DRY DRY 2.97
Meterological Data Site Data General Notes
Instrument specification data and calibration information is provided on a Atmospheric Pressure (mb) 996 Monitoring Personnel Jake Johnstone separate data sheet.
Pressure Rising or Falling Rising GPS Instrument
Weather Conditions Overcast, Dry Equipment Used GFM PID Flowmeter Equipment Serial Atmospheric Oxygen (% vol) 20.9 Number 10072 10072 Ground Conditions Wind Speed & Direction Calm (vegetation stress, visual contamination) Ambient Air Temperature (°C) 7
Issue 4 29.04.14 AG-S-07 Ground Gas Monitoring and Flow Results
Project/Site Name Magnetic Park - Site B Date and Time of Monitoring 22/06/2016 Project Number AG2456-16 Phase of Monitoring 2 of 4
Base of Ground Differential Installed Diameter of Flow Range (litres/hr over 3 mins) Methane % v/v Methane % LEL Carbon dioxide % v/v Oxygen % v/v Water level Water Level installation BH No. Level (m Pressure Depth installation (m bgl) (m AOD) check AOD) (pa) (m bgl) (mm) Max Min Avg Peak Steady Peak Steady Peak Steady Min Steady (m bgl) BH1 139.213 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.8 20.8 4.00 50 1.78 137.43 4.97
BH2 138.061 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.8 20.9 4.50 50 DRY DRY 3.85
BH3 138.076 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.8 20.8 3.00 50 DRY DRY 2.95
Meterological Data Site Data General Notes
Instrument specification data and calibration information is provided on a Atmospheric Pressure (mb) 996 Monitoring Personnel Dave Roberts separate data sheet.
Pressure Rising or Falling Steady GPS Instrument
Weather Conditions Showers Equipment Used GFM PID Flowmeter Equipment Serial Atmospheric Oxygen (% vol) 20.9 Number 10072 10072 Ground Conditions Wind Speed & Direction Calm (vegetation stress, visual contamination) Ambient Air Temperature (°C) NR
Issue 4 29.04.14 AG-S-07 Ground Gas Monitoring and Flow Results
Project/Site Name Magnetic Park - Site B Date and Time of Monitoring 01/07/2016 Project Number AG2456-16 Phase of Monitoring 3 of 4
Base of Ground Differential Installed Diameter of Flow Range (litres/hr over 3 mins) Methane % v/v Methane % LEL Carbon dioxide % v/v Oxygen % v/v Water level Water Level installation BH No. Level (m Pressure Depth installation (m bgl) (m AOD) check AOD) (pa) (m bgl) (mm) Max Min Avg Peak Steady Peak Steady Peak Steady Min Steady (m bgl) BH1 139.213 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 20.7 20.8 4.00 50 2.03 137.18 3.98
BH2 138.061 0.6 0.3 0.6 1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.3 20.8 20.9 4.50 50 DRY DRY 3.86
BH3 138.076 1.6 0.7 1.2 3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 20.8 20.8 3.00 50 DRY DRY 2.96
Meterological Data Site Data General Notes
Instrument specification data and calibration information is provided on a Atmospheric Pressure (mb) 989 Monitoring Personnel Jake Johnstone separate data sheet.
Pressure Rising or Falling Steady GPS Instrument
Weather Conditions Overcast, Dry Equipment Used GFM PID Flowmeter Equipment Serial Atmospheric Oxygen (% vol) 20.9 Number 10072 10072 Ground Conditions Wind Speed & Direction Light Breeze, SW - NE (vegetation stress, visual contamination) Ambient Air Temperature (°C) 15
Issue 4 29.04.14 AG-S-07 Ground Gas Monitoring and Flow Results
Project/Site Name Magnetic Park - Site B Date and Time of Monitoring 05/07/2016 Project Number AG2456-16 Phase of Monitoring 4 of 4
Base of Ground Differential Installed Diameter of Flow Range (litres/hr over 3 mins) Methane % v/v Methane % LEL Carbon dioxide % v/v Oxygen % v/v Water level Water Level installation BH No. Level (m Pressure Depth installation (m bgl) (m AOD) check AOD) (pa) (m bgl) (mm) Max Min Avg Peak Steady Peak Steady Peak Steady Min Steady (m bgl) BH1 139.213 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 20.6 20.8 4.00 50 2.10 137.11 3.97
BH2 138.061 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 21.0 21.1 4.50 50 DRY DRY 3.88
BH3 138.076 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 20.9 20.9 3.00 50 DRY DRY 2.96
Meterological Data Site Data General Notes
Instrument specification data and calibration information is provided on a Atmospheric Pressure (mb) 998 Monitoring Personnel Jake Johnstone separate data sheet.
Pressure Rising or Falling Steady GPS Instrument
Weather Conditions Overcast, Dry Equipment Used GFM PID Flowmeter Equipment Serial Atmospheric Oxygen (% vol) 21.4 Number 10072 10072 Ground Conditions Wind Speed & Direction 8mph east (vegetation stress, visual contamination) Ambient Air Temperature (°C) 15
Issue 4 29.04.14 AG-S-07
APPENDIX E SOIL CHEMICAL RESULTS COMPARED AGAINST SCREENING VALUES FOR HUMAN HEALTH
Site: Magnetic Park - Site B, Desborough Job No: AG2456-16
Land Use: Commercial / Industrial Dataset: All results Soil Organic Matter (%) 1.0 %
Exploratory Hole Reference TP1 (B) TP2 (B) TP3 (B) TP4 (B) TP6 (B) TP5 (B) TP8 (B) TP7 (B) Depth (m) 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.60 No. of samples Commercial / Source/Justification Strata (n) Industrial Units Organic Matter (%) % 0.84 1.1 1.6 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.3 0.59 8 pH 8.3 8.5 8.3 8.2 9.0 8.4 8.3 8.2
Arsenic mg/kg 16 41 30 25 46 39 36 84 8 640 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Cadmium mg/kg 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.32 0.39 0.10 0.15 0.1 8 190 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Chromium mg/kg 15 50 43 39 63 1000 120 130 8 8600 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Chromium (Hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 33 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Copper mg/kg 9.1 15 16 21 16 12 13 7.0 8 68000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Lead mg/kg 11 24 23 26 25 20 18 30 8 2330 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Mercury mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 1100 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Nickel mg/kg 18 34 35 53 44 32 31 58 8 980 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Selenium mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.35 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 8 12000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Zinc mg/kg 26 76 75 90 100 77 61 110 8 730000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015)
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 190 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 84000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 83000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 63000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.34 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 22000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 520000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.23 0.55 0.1 0.30 0.84 0.1 0.17 0.1 8 23000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Pyrene mg/kg 0.28 0.60 0.1 0.28 0.92 0.1 0.17 0.1 8 54000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Benzo[a]anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.48 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.99 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo[b]fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.76 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo[k]fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.23 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.71 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 76 C4SL (2014) Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 8 Genotoxic PAH see Benzo(a)pyrene Total of 16 PAHs mg/kg 2 2 2 2 5.4 2 2 2
Phenols (Total) mg/kg 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 5 440 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015)
Aliphatic TPH >C5-C6 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 3200 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 7800 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 2000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 9700 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 59000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 - - Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 No Risk LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 No Risk LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons mg/kg 5 5 5 5 4 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 26000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 56000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 3500 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 16000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 36000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 28000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 28000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 mg/kg 1 1 1 1 4 28000 LQM/CIEH S4UL (2015) Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons mg/kg 5 5 5 5 4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg/kg 10 10 10 10 4
No No No No No No No No Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Containing Fibres Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected 8
Key - Value within sample set exceeds screening value Statistical value exceeds screening value
LQM/CIEH S4UL Reference No. S4UL3159 (2015) Values in bold are reported at the laboratory limit of detection Benzo(a)pyrene has been used as a 'surrogate marker for genotoxic PAH' as discussed in Appendix E of CL:AIRE SP1010 'Development of C4SL for Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination', December 2013. This allows assessment of the combined carcinogenic risk associated with genotoxic PAH using only b(a)p. Genotoxic PAHs include Benz(a)pyrene, Benzo(a)anthracene, Chrysene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(ah)anthracene, Indeno(123cd)pyrene,
AG-S-02 Issue 4 15/06/15 Chemtest Ltd. Depot Road Newmarket CB8 0AL Tel: 01638 606070 Email: [email protected] Final Report
Report No.: 16-11347-1
Initial Date of Issue: 20-May-2016
Client Applied Geology
Client Address: Unit 23, Abbey Park Stareton Kenilworth Warwickshire CV8 2LY
Contact(s): Lab Results Frankie Hadley Jones
Project AG2456-16 Magnetic Park-Site B, Desborough
Quotation No.: Date Received: 16-May-2016
Order No.: 9730 Date Instructed: 16-May-2016
No. of Samples: 8
Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 20-May-2016
Date Approved: 20-May-2016
Approved By:
Details: Glynn Harvey, Laboratory Manager
Page 1 of 4 Results - Soil
Project: AG2456-16 Magnetic Park-Site B, Desborough Client: Applied Geology Chemtest Job No.: 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 Quotation No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: 294780 294781 294782 294783 294784 294785 294786 294787 Client Sample ID.: TP1 (B) TP2 (B) TP3 (B) TP4 (B) TP6 (B) TP5 (B) TP8 (B) TP7 (B) Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.60 Bottom Depth (m): 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.60 Date Sampled: 10-May-2016 10-May-2016 10-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Organic Matter U 2625 % 0.40 0.84 1.1 1.6 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.3 0.59 Arsenic U 2450 mg/kg 1.0 16 41 30 25 46 39 36 84 Cadmium U 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.32 0.39 0.10 0.15 < 0.10 Chromium U 2450 mg/kg 1.0 15 50 43 39 63 1000 120 130 Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 Chromium (Trivalent) N 2490 mg/kg 5.0 50 43 63 1000 130 Copper U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 9.1 15 16 21 16 12 13 7.0 Lead U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 11 24 23 26 25 20 18 30 Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 Mercury U 2450 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Nickel U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 18 34 35 53 44 32 31 58 Selenium U 2450 mg/kg 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.35 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 Zinc U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 26 76 75 90 100 77 61 110 Naphthalene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthylene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluorene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Phenanthrene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.34 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Anthracene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.11 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluoranthene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 0.23 0.55 < 0.10 0.30 0.84 < 0.10 0.17 < 0.10 Pyrene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 0.28 0.60 < 0.10 0.28 0.92 < 0.10 0.17 < 0.10 Benzo[a]anthracene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.48 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Chrysene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.99 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.76 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.23 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[a]pyrene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.71 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene U 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Total Of 16 PAH's U 2700 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 5.4 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 Total Phenols U 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 Aliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C16-C35 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons U 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Page 2 of 4 Results - Soil
Project: AG2456-16 Magnetic Park-Site B, Desborough Client: Applied Geology Chemtest Job No.: 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 16-11347 Quotation No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: 294780 294781 294782 294783 294784 294785 294786 294787 Client Sample ID.: TP1 (B) TP2 (B) TP3 (B) TP4 (B) TP6 (B) TP5 (B) TP8 (B) TP7 (B) Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.60 Bottom Depth (m): 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.60 Date Sampled: 10-May-2016 10-May-2016 10-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 11-May-2016 Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons U 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons U 2680 mg/kg 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 U 2120 g/l 0.010 0.030 < 0.010 0.029 < 0.010 0.082 < 0.010 0.037 0.024 ACM Type U 2192 N/A ------No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos No Asbestos Asbestos Identification U 2192 % 0.001 Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Detected Moisture N 2030 % 0.020 17 12 18 25 13 16 15 15 Stones N 2030 % 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 pH U 2010 N/A 8.3 8.5 8.3 8.2 9.0 8.4 8.3 8.2
Page 3 of 4 Report Information
Key U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory I/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated < "less than" > "greater than"
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1
Sample Deviation Codes A - Date of sampling not supplied B - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C - Sample not received in appropriate containers D - Broken Container
Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage
If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]
Page 4 of 4 Applied Geology Ltd Unit 23 Abbey Park Stareton Kenilworth Warwickshire CV8 2LY For the attention of Frankie Hadley-Jones
Report No: B20102 Issue No 01 LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Project Name MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Project Number B20102 Date samples received 15/06/2016 Your Ref AG2456-16 Date written instructions received 15/06/2016 Purchase Order 9804 Date testing commenced 15/06/2016 Please find enclosed the results as summarised below
Figure / Test ISO 17025 Description Table Quantity Accredited
1 ~ Summary of Geotechnical Tests See table 2 1 Atterberg Limit Yes 3 - 4 2 Particle Size Distribution Yes 5 1 Moisture Content / Dry Density Relationship Yes 6 - 8 3 California Bearing Ratio Yes
Remarks :
Issued by : Stephen Langman Date of Issue : 27/07/2016 Key to symbols used in this report S/C : Testing was sub-contracted
Approved Signatories : 27/07/2016 G Wilson (JMD/Laboratories Director), S Langman (Laboratory Coordinator) Unless we are notified to the contrary, samples will be disposed after a period of one month from this date. The results reported relate to samples received in the laboratory only. All results contained in this report are provisional unless signed by an approved signatory This report should not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratory. Under multisite accreditation the testing contained in this report may have been performed at another Terra Tek laboratory. The enclosed results remain the property of Terra Tek Limited and we reserve the right to withdraw our report if we have not received cleared funds in accordance with our standard terms and conditions Only those results indicated in this report are UKAS accredited and any opinions or interpretations expressed are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation. Feedback on the this report may be left via our website www.terratek.co.uk/contact-us
Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Tel: +44 (0)121 344 4838 Fax: +44 (0)121 356 3599 [email protected] www.terratek.co.uk Terra Tek Ltd is registered in Scotland No. 121594 Offices in Airdrie, Birmingham, Belfast and Chesham Head Office : 62 Rochsolloch Road, Airdrie, ML6 9BG Version 074 - 14/11/2013 1121 - Geotechnical Test Summary - B20102.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification Atterberg limits Density Total Stress
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Non Engineering Sample
Sample C Other Tests Dry Hole m Ref Type Description Bulk ID 425µm Particle Density Particle Liquid Limit Liquid Moisture Content Moisture Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Resistance Phi Resistance Shear Strength Shear Angle of Shearing Angle Apparent Cohesion Apparent Percentage retained retained Percentage Atterberg Classification Atterberg
% % % % Mg/m³ Mg/m³ Mg/m³ kPa kPa TP12 0.50-0.50 B 293823 PSD
TP12 0.50-1.50 COMBINED B 296222#3 Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL CBR with much clayey silty sand.
TP12 0.50-1.50 COMBINED B 296222#1 CBR
TP12 0.50-1.50 COMBINED B 296222 Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL 13 45 19 26 55 CI 2.61 2.5kg Compaction LabProjectNo B20102 27/07/2016 : 16:02:35 with much clayey silty sand. MoorLane, Witton,Birmingham, B67HG
TP12 0.50-1.50 COMBINED B 296222#2 Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL CBR with much clayey silty sand.
Notes Opinions and interpretations are outside the scope Test details are given on the 'Notes on Laboratory Procedures' sheet See individual report of UKAS accreditation UKAS Accredited Test Y/N Y Y Y YY -YY YY YY sheets
Originator Approved SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL TESTS Figure 1 ME 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 2 Version 074 - 14/11/2013 1121 - Geotechnical Test Summary - B20102.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification Atterberg limits Density Total Stress
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Non Engineering Sample
Sample C Other Tests Dry Hole m Ref Type Description Bulk ID 425µm Particle Density Particle Liquid Limit Liquid Moisture Content Moisture Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Resistance Phi Resistance Shear Strength Shear Angle of Shearing Angle Apparent Cohesion Apparent Percentage retained retained Percentage Atterberg Classification Atterberg
% % % % Mg/m³ Mg/m³ Mg/m³ kPa kPa TP12 1.50-1.50 B 293824 PSD LabProjectNo B20102 27/07/2016 : 16:02:35 MoorLane, Witton,Birmingham, B67HG
Notes Opinions and interpretations are outside the scope Test details are given on the 'Notes on Laboratory Procedures' sheet See individual report of UKAS accreditation UKAS Accredited Test Y/N Y Y Y YY -YY YY YY sheets
Originator Approved SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL TESTS Figure 1 ME 27/07/2016 t Sheet 2 of 2 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP12 Sample Ref COMBINED Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty sand.
Preparation : Sample washed and air dried
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50 40 30 1220 - LLPL TP12 00.50 COMBINED B - B20102-296222.xls- 1220B LLPL-00.50 TP12 SampleCOMBINED 296222 : ID Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 13 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 55 % Liquid Limit : 45 % Plastic Limit : 19 % Plasticity Index : 26
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 29 % Liquidity Index : 0.38
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 2 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 TE Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20102 : 27/07/2016 16:02:39 27/07/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole TP12 Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-0.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 059 - 24/06/2013 - 059 Version
Non Engineering Description Particle Size % Passing
Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty 125.0 mm 100 sand. 90.0 mm 100 75.0 mm 100 63.0 mm 100 50.0 mm 95 Sample Proportions - % 37.5 mm 92 Cobbles 1.1 28.0 mm 89 20.0 mm 77 Gravel 57.9 1260 - PSD TP12 00.50 B - B20102-293823.xls- 00.50 TP121260 B PSD - Sample293823 : ID 14.0 mm 69 Sand 26.4 10.0 mm 62 Silt & Clay 14.6 6.30 mm 54 5.00 mm 51 3.35 mm 46 2.00 mm 41 Particle Diameter - mm 1.18 mm 37 D100 63 600 µm 32 425 µm 29 D60 8.9 300 µm 26 D10 212 µm 22 Uniformity Coefficient N/A 150 µm 19 63 µm 15 Notes
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Clay Cobbles Silt Sand Gravel
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Percentage Passing - % - Passing Percentage 30
20
10
0 0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2 6 20 60 200 Particle Size - mm
Checked & Originator Approved PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Figure 3 BS1377:Part 2:1990 Clause 9.2 - Wet Sieving LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 16:02:44 : 27/07/2016 B20102 No Project Lab 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole TP12 Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 1.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 059 - 24/06/2013 - 059 Version
Non Engineering Description Particle Size % Passing
Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty 125.0 mm 100 sand. 90.0 mm 100 75.0 mm 100 63.0 mm 100 50.0 mm 100 Sample Proportions - % 37.5 mm 95 Cobbles 0.0 28.0 mm 87 20.0 mm 80 Gravel 55.4 1260 - PSD TP12 01.50 B - B20102-293824.xls- 01.50 TP121260 B PSD - Sample293824 : ID 14.0 mm 72 Sand 28.5 10.0 mm 64 Silt & Clay 16.1 6.30 mm 56 5.00 mm 53 3.35 mm 49 2.00 mm 45 Particle Diameter - mm 1.18 mm 41 D100 50 600 µm 36 425 µm 33 D60 8.0 300 µm 29 D10 212 µm 25 Uniformity Coefficient N/A 150 µm 22 63 µm 16 Notes
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Clay Cobbles Silt Sand Gravel
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Percentage Passing - % - Passing Percentage 30
20
10
0 0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2 6 20 60 200 Particle Size - mm
Checked & Originator Approved PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 BS1377:Part 2:1990 Clause 9.2 - Wet Sieving LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 16:02:50 : 27/07/2016 B20102 No Project Lab 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole TP12 Sample Ref COMBINED Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 019 - 05/09/2013
0 % Air Voids 5 % Air Voids 10 % Air Voids 2.10
2.00 1410 - Comp TP12 00.50 COMBINED B - B20102-296222.xls : Sample ID 296222 ID Sample : B20102-296222.xls - B COMBINED 00.50 TP12 Comp - 1410
3 1.90
1.80 Dry Density, Mg/m DryDensity,
1.70
1.60
1.50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture Content, %
Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with Non Engineering Description much clayey silty sand.
Preparation Air dried 2.5kg Rammer for soils with some coarse Test Method gravel-size particles Samples Used Single Mass Retained on 37.5 mm Sieve % 10 Mass Retained on 20.0 mm Sieve % 11 Particle Density - Measured Mg/m³ 2.61 Natural Moisture Content % 13 Maximum Dry Density Mg/m³ 1.89 Optimum Moisture Content % 13.1
Checked & Originator Approved Moisture Content / Dry Density Relationship Figure 5 BS1377:Part 4:1990 Clause 3.4 SG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG B6 Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 16:02:55 27/07/2016 : B20102 No Project Lab 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP12 Sample No COMBINED Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 026 11/02/2014-
Non Engineering Description: Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty sand.
Preparation Details: Specimen was prepared at natural moisture content Compaction using 2.5kg compactive effort Specimen Bulk Density 2.05 Mg/m³ Specimen Dry Density 1.85 Mg/m³ Mass of sample > 20 mm 21.3 % Specimen Unsoaked Test Details: Top Base Surcharge: 4.5 kg 4.5 kg Seating Load: 50 N 50 N Moisture Content: 10 % 11 % 1440 CBR - TP12 00.50 COMBINED B B20102-296222#1.xls- : Sample ID 296222#1
CBR Value: 32 % 43 %
Top of Specimen Base of Specimen Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4 Force on plunger (kN) plunger on Force 3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
Checked & Originator Approved CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO Figure 6 BS1377 : Part 4 : Clause 7 : 1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20102 : 27/07/2016 16:02:59 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP12 Sample No COMBINED Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 026 11/02/2014-
Non Engineering Description: Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty sand.
Preparation Details: Specimen was prepared at natural moisture content Compaction using 2.5kg compactive effort Specimen Bulk Density 2.14 Mg/m³ Specimen Dry Density 1.89 Mg/m³ Mass of sample > 20 mm 21.3 % Specimen Unsoaked Test Details: Top Base Surcharge: 4.5 kg 4.5 kg Seating Load: 50 N 50 N Moisture Content: 13 % 14 % 1440 CBR - TP12 00.50 COMBINED B B20102-296222#2.xls- : Sample ID 296222#2
CBR Value: 11 % 15 %
Top of Specimen Base of Specimen Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2 Force on plunger (kN) plunger on Force
1 1
0 0
Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
Checked & Originator Approved CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO Figure 7 BS1377 : Part 4 : Clause 7 : 1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20102 : 27/07/2016 16:03:04 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP12 Sample No COMBINED Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 0.50-1.50 Engineer Sample Type B Version 026 11/02/2014-
Non Engineering Description: Dark brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with much clayey silty sand.
Preparation Details: Specimen was prepared at natural moisture content Compaction using 2.5kg compactive effort Specimen Bulk Density 2.12 Mg/m³ Specimen Dry Density 1.83 Mg/m³ Mass of sample > 20 mm 21.3 % Specimen Unsoaked Test Details: Top Base Surcharge: 4.5 kg 4.5 kg Seating Load: 10 N 10 N Moisture Content: 15 % 16 % 1440 CBR - TP12 00.50 COMBINED B B20102-296222#3.xls- : Sample ID 296222#3
CBR Value: 1.8 % 1.3 %
Top of Specimen Base of Specimen Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4 Force on plunger (kN) plunger on Force
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
Penetration (mm) Penetration (mm)
Checked & Originator Approved CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO Figure 8 BS1377 : Part 4 : Clause 7 : 1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20102 : 27/07/2016 16:03:09 27/07/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Applied Geology Ltd Unit 23 Abbey Park Stareton Kenilworth Warwickshire CV8 2LY For the attention of Frankie Hadley-Jones
Report No: B20075 Issue No 01 LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Project Name MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Project Number B20075 Date samples received 01/06/2016 Your Ref AG2456-16 Date written instructions received 01/06/2016 Purchase Order Date testing commenced 01/06/2016 Please find enclosed the results as summarised below
Figure / Test ISO 17025 Description Table Quantity Accredited
1 ~ Summary of Geotechnical Tests See Table 2 6 BRE Suite - Soil See Report 3-7 5 Atterberg Limit Yes 8-10 3 One Dimensional Consolidation Yes 11-12 2 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Yes
App X ~ Sample Descriptions - Soil N/A App Y ~ Summary of In-House Analytical Test Methods - Soil N/A Remarks :
Issued by : Stephen Langman Date of Issue : 23/06/2016 Key to symbols used in this report S/C : Testing was sub-contracted
Approved Signatories : 23/06/2016 G Wilson (JMD/Laboratories Director), S Langman (Laboratory Coordinator) Unless we are notified to the contrary, samples will be disposed after a period of one month from this date. The results reported relate to samples received in the laboratory only. All results contained in this report are provisional unless signed by an approved signatory This report should not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratory. Under multisite accreditation the testing contained in this report may have been performed at another Terra Tek laboratory. The enclosed results remain the property of Terra Tek Limited and we reserve the right to withdraw our report if we have not received cleared funds in accordance with our standard terms and conditions Only those results indicated in this report are UKAS accredited and any opinions or interpretations expressed are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation. Feedback on the this report may be left via our website www.terratek.co.uk/contact-us
Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Tel: +44 (0)121 344 4838 Fax: +44 (0)121 356 3599 [email protected] www.terratek.co.uk Terra Tek Ltd is registered in Scotland No. 121594 Offices in Airdrie, Birmingham, Belfast and Chesham Head Office : 62 Rochsolloch Road, Airdrie, ML6 9BG Version 074 - 14/11/2013 1121 - Geotechnical Test Summary - B20075.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification Atterberg limits Density Total Stress
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Non Engineering Sample
Sample C Other Tests Dry Hole m Ref Type Description Bulk ID 425µm Particle Density Particle Liquid Limit Liquid Moisture Content Moisture Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Resistance Phi Resistance Shear Strength Shear Angle of Shearing Angle Apparent Cohesion Apparent Percentage retained retained Percentage Atterberg Classification Atterberg
% % % % Mg/m³ Mg/m³ Mg/m³ kPa kPa BH1B 2.20-2.65 U 293085 Brown slightly sandy CLAY with 17 44 21 23 23 CI 2.13 1.82 199 some gravel.Gravel is fine to medium.
BH1B 2.65-2.65 T 293089 Dark brown sandy CLAY with some BRE SD1 Suite fine to medium gravel.
BH1B 3.90-4.30 U 293086 Brown slightly sandy CLAY with 13 41 17 24 27 CI 2.04 1.81 Oed much gravel.Gravel is fine to medium
BH1B 4.60-4.75 T 293090 Brown SAND with some fine to BRE SD1 Suite LabProjectNo B20075 23/06/2016 : 13:20:29 medium gravel. MoorLane, Witton,Birmingham, B67HG
BH2B 1.00-1.00 T 293091 Dark brown CLAY with some fine to BRE SD1 Suite medium gravel.
Notes Opinions and interpretations are outside the scope Test details are given on the 'Notes on Laboratory Procedures' sheet See individual report of UKAS accreditation UKAS Accredited Test Y/N Y Y Y YY -YY YY Y Y sheets
Originator Approved SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL TESTS Figure 1 ME 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 3 Version 074 - 14/11/2013 1121 - Geotechnical Test Summary - B20075.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification Atterberg limits Density Total Stress
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Non Engineering Sample
Sample C Other Tests Dry Hole m Ref Type Description Bulk ID 425µm Particle Density Particle Liquid Limit Liquid Moisture Content Moisture Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Resistance Phi Resistance Shear Strength Shear Angle of Shearing Angle Apparent Cohesion Apparent Percentage retained retained Percentage Atterberg Classification Atterberg
% % % % Mg/m³ Mg/m³ Mg/m³ kPa kPa BH2B 2.20-2.65 U 293087 Brown slightly sandy CLAY with 17 41 20 21 12 CI 2.10 1.79 150 Oed some gravel.Gravel is fine to medium
BH2B 4.32-4.55 T 293092 Brown clayey SAND with some fine BRE SD1 Suite to medium gravel.
BH3B 1.20-1.65 U 293088 Brown sandy CLAY with some 22 51 19 32 11 CH 1.99 1.63 Oed gravel.Gravel is fine to medium.
BH3B 1.80-1.80 T 293093 Brown CLAY BRE SD1 Suite LabProjectNo B20075 23/06/2016 : 13:20:30 MoorLane, Witton,Birmingham, B67HG
BH3B 3.00-3.00 T 293094 Bown SAND with some fine gravel. BRE SD1 Suite
Notes Opinions and interpretations are outside the scope Test details are given on the 'Notes on Laboratory Procedures' sheet See individual report of UKAS accreditation UKAS Accredited Test Y/N Y Y Y YY -YY YY Y Y sheets
Originator Approved SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL TESTS Figure 1 ME 23/06/2016 t Sheet 2 of 3 Version 074 - 14/11/2013 1121 - Geotechnical Test Summary - B20075.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification Atterberg limits Density Total Stress
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Non Engineering Sample
Sample C Other Tests Dry Hole m Ref Type Description Bulk ID 425µm Particle Density Particle Liquid Limit Liquid Moisture Content Moisture Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Resistance Phi Resistance Shear Strength Shear Angle of Shearing Angle Apparent Cohesion Apparent Percentage retained retained Percentage Atterberg Classification Atterberg
% % % % Mg/m³ Mg/m³ Mg/m³ kPa kPa TP2 (B) 1.20-1.20 T 293095 Brown mottled grey CLAY with 18 38 18 20 9 CI some gravel. Gravel is fine to medium.
TP4 (B) 1.00-1.00 T 293096 Brown mottled grey CLAY with 19 43 18 25 5 CI some chalk. Chalk is fine to medium. LabProjectNo B20075 23/06/2016 : 13:20:31 MoorLane, Witton,Birmingham, B67HG
Notes Opinions and interpretations are outside the scope Test details are given on the 'Notes on Laboratory Procedures' sheet See individual report of UKAS accreditation UKAS Accredited Test Y/N Y Y Y YY -YY YY Y Y sheets
Originator Approved SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL TESTS Figure 1 ME 23/06/2016 t Sheet 3 of 3 Version 011 - 26/07/2012 1140 Suite -- Soil B20075BRE 01.xls Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Sample Identification
Lab Depth Sample Sample Hole Sample m Ref Type ID Sulphate (acid soluble as soluble (acid Sulphate SO4) in soluble (water Sulphate as extract) SO4 2:1 pH Sulphur Total
% g/l %
BH1B 2.65-2.65 T 293089 3.88 1.80 7.9 0.11
BH1B 4.60-4.75 T 293090 0.09 0.51 7.9 <0.05
BH2B 1.00-1.00 T 293091 0.03 0.04 8.3 <0.05
BH2B 4.32-4.55 T 293092 0.16 0.34 8.0 0.08
BH3B 1.80-1.80 T 293093 <0.02 0.06 8.1 <0.05
BH3B 3.00-3.00 T 293094 <0.02 0.03 8.6 <0.05 Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:20:36 Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG
Limits of Detection 0.02 0.01 0.1 0.05 Terra Tek Analysis Method TP029 TP043 TP019 S/C Accreditation M=Mcerts U=UKAS N=No accreditation MMMN Checked & Originator Approved BRE SD1 SUITE - SOIL Figure 2 TGH 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH1B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 2.20-2.65 Engineer Sample Type U
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Brown slightly sandy CLAY with some gravel.Gravel is fine to medium.
Preparation : Sample washed and air dried
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50
1220 LLPL- BH1B 02.20 B20075-293085.xlsU - : Sample ID 293085 40 30 Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 17 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 23 % Liquid Limit : 44 % Plastic Limit : 21 % Plasticity Index : 23
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 22 % Liquidity Index : 0.04
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 3 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:20:40 23/06/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH2B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 2.20-2.65 Engineer Sample Type U
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Brown slightly sandy CLAY with some gravel.Gravel is fine to medium
Preparation : Sample washed and air dried
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50
1220 LLPL- BH2B 02.20 B20075-293087.xlsU - : Sample ID 293087 40 30 Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 17 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 12 % Liquid Limit : 41 % Plastic Limit : 20 % Plasticity Index : 21
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 19 % Liquidity Index : -0.05
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 4 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:20:45 23/06/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH3B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 1.20-1.65 Engineer Sample Type U
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Brown sandy CLAY with some gravel.Gravel is fine to medium.
Preparation : Sample washed and air dried
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50
1220 LLPL- BH3B 01.20 B20075-293088.xlsU - : Sample ID 293088 40 30 Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 22 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 11 % Liquid Limit : 51 % Plastic Limit : 19 % Plasticity Index : 32
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 25 % Liquidity Index : 0.19
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 5 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:20:51 23/06/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP2 (B) Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 1.20-1.20 Engineer Sample Type T
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Brown mottled grey CLAY with some gravel. Gravel is fine to medium.
Preparation : Sample as received
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50 40 1220 LLPL- TP2 01.20(B) B20075-293095.xlsT - : Sample ID 293095 30 Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 18 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 9 % Liquid Limit : 38 % Plastic Limit : 18 % Plasticity Index : 20
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 20 % Liquidity Index : 0.10
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 6 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:20:56 23/06/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID TP4 (B) Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 1.00-1.00 Engineer Sample Type T
Version 051 08/11/2013- Non Engineering Description : Brown mottled grey CLAY with some chalk. Chalk is fine to medium.
Preparation : Sample as received
80 C L C I C H C V C E 70 60 50 40 1220 LLPL- TP4 01.00(B) B20075-293096.xlsT - : Sample ID 293096 30 Plasticity Index Plasticity 20 10 M L M I M H M V M E 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (%)
Results : As Received Moisture Content : (BS1377:Part 2:Clause 3:1990) 19 % Percentage retained on 425µm sieve : 5 % Liquid Limit : 43 % Plastic Limit : 18 % Plasticity Index : 25
Equivalent moisture content of material passing 425µm sieve : 20 % Liquidity Index : 0.08
Checked & Liquid Limit (One Point Cone Penetrometer Method) Originator Approved Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index & Liquidity Index Figure 7 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 4.4:1990 LG Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:02 23/06/2016 BS 1377:Part 2:Clause 5:1990 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH1B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 3.90-4.30 Engineer Sample Type U Version062 11/05/2011 -
Non Engineering Description: Brown sandy CLAY with some gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse.
Initial Moisture Content 16 % Final Moisture Content 16 % Initial Voids Ratio 0.524 Final Voids Ratio 0.438 Initial Bulk Density 2.04 Mg/m³ Particle Density 2.68 Mg/m³ Assumed Initial Dry Density 1.76 Mg/m³ Degree of saturation 81 % Specimen Dimensions 19.97mm x 75.04mm dia Laboratory temperature 20±2°C Specimen taken 50mm below top of (U100) tube by vertical extrusion with horizontal orientation 1510 - OED BH1B 03.90 U - B20075-293086.xls : Sample ID 293086
Pressure Range Mv Cv (root time) Cv (log time) Duration Voids ratio (e) C sec kPa m²/MN m²/year m²/year days 2 - 80 0.070 swelling swelling 0.516 1 80 - 160 0.103 5.57 2.26 0.503 1 160 - 320 0.134 5.02 1.35 0.471 1 320 - 640 0.097 3.07 1.17 0.425 1 640 - 1280 0.050 2.08 0.88 0.379 1 1280 - 80 0.035 2.66 0.46 0.438 1
0.60 2.5
0.55 2
0.50 1.5
0.45
1 Voids Ratio (e) 0.40 •ConsolidationCoefficientof (T50) m²/yr 0.5 0.35
0.30 0 1 10 100 1000 10000 Effective Pressure (kPa)
Checked & Originator Approved ONE DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION Figure 8 BS1377:PART 5:1990 MUF Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:10 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH2B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 2.20-2.65 Engineer Sample Type U Version062 11/05/2011 -
Non Engineering Description: Brown CLAY with occasional gravel. Gravel is fine to medium.
Initial Moisture Content 17 % Final Moisture Content 18 % Initial Voids Ratio 0.484 Final Voids Ratio 0.441 Initial Bulk Density 2.11 Mg/m³ Particle Density 2.68 Mg/m³ Assumed Initial Dry Density 1.81 Mg/m³ Degree of saturation 94 % Specimen Dimensions 19.97mm x 75.00mm dia Laboratory temperature 20±2°C Specimen taken 50mm below top of (U100) tube by vertical extrusion with horizontal orientation 1510 - OED BH2B 02.20 U - B20075-293087.xls : Sample ID 293087
Pressure Range Mv Cv (root time) Cv (log time) Duration Voids ratio (e) C sec kPa m²/MN m²/year m²/year days 2 - 45 0.042 swelling swelling 0.481 1 45 - 90 0.059 6.28 6.87 0.477 1 90 - 180 0.093 6.13 2.91 0.465 1 180 - 360 0.078 5.06 2.77 0.444 1 360 - 720 0.084 3.06 2.12 0.401 1 720 - 45 0.043 2.02 1.06 0.441 1
0.60 8
7 0.55
6
0.50 5
0.45 4
Voids Ratio (e) 3 0.40
2 •ConsolidationCoefficientof (T50) m²/yr
0.35 1
0.30 0 1 10 100 1000 Effective Pressure (kPa)
Checked & Originator Approved ONE DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION Figure 9 BS1377:PART 5:1990 MUF Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:20 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole ID BH3B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 1.20-1.65 Engineer Sample Type U Version062 11/05/2011 -
Non Engineering Description: Brown CLAY with few gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse.
Initial Moisture Content 24 % Final Moisture Content 24 % Initial Voids Ratio 0.662 Final Voids Ratio 0.611 Initial Bulk Density 1.99 Mg/m³ Particle Density 2.68 Mg/m³ Assumed Initial Dry Density 1.61 Mg/m³ Degree of saturation 96 % Specimen Dimensions 19.96mm x 75.11mm dia Laboratory temperature 20±2°C Specimen taken 50mm below top of (U100) tube by vertical extrusion with horizontal orientation 1510 - OED BH3B 01.20 U - B20075-293088.xls : Sample ID 293088
Pressure Range Mv Cv (root time) Cv (log time) Duration Voids ratio (e) C sec kPa m²/MN m²/year m²/year days 2 - 25 0.344 33.75 unable to assess 0.649 1 25 - 50 0.092 11.13 0.95 0.645 1 50 - 100 0.203 4.87 0.72 0.628 1 100 - 200 0.196 4.68 0.30 0.596 1 200 - 50 0.060 2.71 0.34 0.611 1
0.660 1
0.9 0.650 0.8
0.640 0.7
0.6 0.630
0.5
0.620 0.4 Voids Ratio (e)
0.610 0.3 •ConsolidationCoefficientof (T50) m²/yr 0.2 0.600 0.1
0.590 0 1 10 100 1000 Effective Pressure (kPa)
Checked & Originator Approved ONE DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION Figure 10 BS1377:PART 5:1990 MUF Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:29 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Version 034 - 22/11/2012 Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:37 1730 - UUTXL BH1B 02.20 U - B20075-293085.xls : Sample ID 293085 T Originator Test Details Test Details Sample ME Mode of Failure of Mode Failure at Strain Displacement Axial of Rate Density Bulk Content Moisture Maximum Deviator Stress Deviator Maximum Pressure Cell Correction Membrane Thickness Membrane Diameter Height Non Engineering Description Engineering Non Strength Shear Density Dry Condition Sample Checked & Checked 23/06/2016 Approved Shear Stress - kPa Deviator Stress - kPa 100 150 200 250 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50 50 0 0 0 0 Engineer Client Site 01010202030304040500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 UNCONSOLIDA STA 5 Applied Geology Ltd Geology Applied MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH B, SITE - PARK MAGNETIC Mg/m³ Mg/m³ %/min GE TRIA GE kPa kPa kPa kPa mm mm mm BS 1377 : Part 7 : 1990 Clause 8 % % Stiff brown CLAY with some gravel.Gravel is gravel.Gravel some with CLAY brown Stiff Undisturbed 103.8 200.4 2.00 0.61 0.20 1.82 2.13 15.5 199 398 45 17 TED UNDRA TED 10 Normal Stress - kPa - Stress Normal XIA Strain - % - Strain L COMPRESSION L fine to medium. to fine Plastic 15 INED SINGLE INED 20 Contract No. Contract 100mm below top of tube of top below 100mm taken specimen Undisturbed Comments Type Sample (m) Depth Ref Sample Hole Shear Strength Parameters Strength Shear t Phi C 25 n/a n/a U 2.20-2.65 BH1B AG Figure 11 ° kPa Sheet 1 of 2 of 1 Sheet 2456-16 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole BH1B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 2.20-2.65 Engineer Sample Type U Revision 1.23 21/07/2010 1.23 Revision 1730 - UUTXL BH1B 02.20 U - B20075-293085.xls U 02.20 BH1B - UUTXL 1730 1
2
Checked & Originator Please note that these photographs are intended to show the Approved Figure 11 failure mode, and do not necessarily show accurately the ME colouration of the soil. Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG B6 Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor B20075 No Project Lab 23/06/2016 t Sheet 2 of 2 Contract No. AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH Hole BH2B Sample Ref Client Applied Geology Ltd T Depth (m) 2.20-2.65 Engineer Sample Type U Version 034 - 22/11/2012 - 034 Version
Sample Details Comments Sample Condition Undisturbed Undisturbed specimen taken Height mm 199.9 100mm below top of tube Diameter mm 103.8 Moisture Content % 17 Bulk Density Mg/m³ 2.10 Dry Density Mg/m³ 1.80 Test Details Membrane Thickness mm 0.20 Membrane Correction kPa 0.73 Rate of Axial Displacement %/min 2.00 Cell Pressure kPa 45 Strain at Failure % 20.0
1730 - UUTXL BH2B 02.20 U - B20075-293087.xls : Sample ID 293087 : Sample B20075-293087.xls - U 02.20 BH2B UUTXL - 1730 Maximum Deviator Stress kPa 299 Shear Strength kPa 150 Mode of Failure Plastic Shear Strength Parameters Stiff brown CLAY with some gravel.Gravel is Non Engineering Description C n/a kPa fine to medium. Phi n/a °
350
300
250
200
150
100 Deviator Stress - kPaDeviator
50
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strain - %
200
150
100 Shear Stress kPa- Shear 50
0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Normal Stress - kPa
Checked & UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED SINGLE Originator Approved STAGE TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION Figure 12 BS 1377 : Part 7 : 1990 Clause 8 ME Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 13:21:44 : 23/06/2016 B20075 No Project Lab 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 2 Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Revision 1.23 21/07/2010 Lab Project No B20075 1730 - UUTXL BH2B 02.20 U - B20075-293087.xls T Originator ME Checked & 23/06/2016 Approved Please note that these photographs are intended to show the show to intended are photographs these that note Please Site Engineer Client failure mode, and do not necessarily show accurately the accurately show necessarily not do and mode, failure Applied Geology Ltd Geology Applied MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH colouration of the soil. the of colouration 2 1 Sample Type Sample Depth (m) Sample Ref Hole Contract No t U 2.20-2.65 BH2B AG Figure 12 Sheet 2 of 2 2456-16 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Version 017 -Version 22/01/2015 Sample Identification 8050 8050 - - 01.xls Descriptions B20075
Lab Exploratory Depth Sample Sample Date Description Sample Hole m Ref Type Sampled ID on receipt °C Temperature of cool box
BH1B 2.65-2.65 T 293089 10/05/16 10.4 Dark brown sandy CLAY with some fine to medium gravel.
BH1B 4.60-4.75 T 293090 10/05/16 10.4 Brown SAND with some fine to medium gravel.
BH2B 1.00-1.00 T 293091 09/05/16 10.4 Dark brown CLAY with some fine to medium gravel.
BH2B 4.32-4.55 T 293092 09/05/16 10.4 Brown clayey SAND with some fine to medium gravel.
BH3B 1.80-1.80 T 293093 09/05/16 10.4 Brown CLAY
BH3B 3.00-3.00 T 293094 09/05/16 10.4 Bown SAND with some fine gravel.
Notes 1. Where a date of sampling is not provided, the sample is classified as deviating. 2. Temperatures exceeding 6°C on receipt may be deviating, but will be dependent upon the suite of tests carried out. 3. Samples are considered deviating if the incorrect sample container type has been used. This is indicated within the report tables. 4. Results reported for samples classified as deviating may be compromised.
Checked & Originator Approved Appendix X LABORATORY DESCRIPTIONS TGH Lab Project No B20075 : 23/06/2016 13:21:51 Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG 23/06/2016 t Sheet 1 of 1 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Version 026 - 21/05/2009 - 026 Version Wet/Dry Method ISO17025 MCERTS Reference Description of Method Sample Code Accredited Accredited Tested
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering GP001 Preparation of soil samples for chemical analysis Yes Yes N/A
8100 - Test Methods Soil - B20075 01.xls B20075 Soil - Methods Test - 8100 Purposes. BS EN 12457-3: Characterisation of Waste - GP012 Compliance test for leaching of granular waste Preparation of soil samples for two-stage leachate test Dry materials and sludges (two-stage batch test) BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering Determination of pH in 2.5:1 water/soil extract using pH TP019 Yes Yes Dry Purposes. meter.
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP029 Determination of acid soluble sulfate by gravimetry. Yes Yes Dry Purposes.
MAFF Book 427: The Analysis of Agricultural TP032 Determination of water soluble boron by colorimetry Yes Dry Materials: Method 8
Determination of Toluene Extractable Matter by soxhlet TP033 APHA/AWWA, 19th edition: Method 5520E Yes Dry extraction.
TP040 APHA/AWWA, 19th edition: Method 3500Cr-D Determination of hexavalent chromium by colorimetry. Yes Dry
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP041 Determination of organic matter by titrimetry. Yes Dry Purposes.
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP042 Determination of loss on ignition at 50-440°C by gravimetry Yes Yes Dry Purposes.
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering Determination of water soluble sulfate in 2:1 water/soil TP043 Yes Yes Dry Purposes. extract
GACHAMJA A.M. Chromatography and Analysis: Determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons extractable in TP045 Yes Yes Dry 1992 9-11 (modified) dichloromethane, by GC/MS
MEWAM method: Phenols in water and Effluents: Determination of monohydric phenols by steam TP046 Yes Yes Dry 4-aminoantipyrine method distillation/colorimetry
Determination of Free Cyanide by steam TP047 MEWAM method: Cyanide in Waters etc Yes Dry distillation/colorimetry
Determination of total cyanide by steam TP048 MEWAM method: Cyanide in Waters etc Yes Yes Wet distillation/colorimetry.
TP049 MEWAM method: Cyanide in Waters etc Determination of complex cyanide by calculation Yes Dry
MEWAM method: Determination of Thiocyanate TP050 Determination of thiocyanate by colorimetry Yes Yes Dry ,1985
Determination of acid soluble sulfides by steam TP051 USEPA Method 9030B Yes Yes Dry distillation/colorimetry.
Determination of elemental sulfur by soxhlet extraction and TP052 BS1881: Part 324, 1988: Testing Concrete Yes Dry titrimetry.
Determination of pentane/acetone extractable petroleum TP067 TNRCC Method 1005: 2001 (modified) Yes Yes Wet hydrocarbons (C8 - C40) by GC/FID
TP072 In-house documented method Determination of ammoniacal nitrogen by colorimetry. Dry
Notes 1. Terra Tek (Birmingham) are MCERTS accredited for clay, sand & loam matrix types only, where they constitute the major component of the sample. Other coarse granular materials, ie gravel, are not accredited where they comprise the major component of the sample. 2. Results are expressed on a dry-weight basis (samples dried at 30°C ± 5°C) except where stated. 3. The laboratory removes any material >2mm prior to analysis. The quantity and nature of any material removed from samples is recorded and the information is available on request. 4. The laboratory records the date of analysis of each parameter. This information is available on request. 5. Where a parameter cannot be determined in house it is our policy to use a UKAS/MCERTS accredited laboratory wherever possible. Terra Tek will assume responsibility for the quality of subcontracted tests and the performance of the subcontractor chosen. Where there is no known UKAS/MCERTS laboratory for a particular parameter, a laboratory listed within the Terra Tek Approved Subcontractors list, which is subject to performance assessment, will be selected.
Checked & Originator Appendix Y Approved SUMMARY OF IN-HOUSE ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS (SOIL) N/A N/A Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 13:21:55 : 23/06/2016 B20075 No Project Lab t Sheet 1 of 2 Contract No AG2456-16 Site MAGNETIC PARK - SITE B, DESBOROUGH T Client Applied Geology Ltd Engineer
Version 026 - 21/05/2009 - 026 Version Wet/Dry Method ISO17025 MCERTS Reference Description of Method Sample Code Accredited Accredited Tested
TP073 In-house documented method Determination of anionic detergent (MBAS) by colorimetry Dry 8100 - Test Methods Soil - B20075 01.xls B20075 Soil - Methods Test - 8100
Determination of water soluble fluoride by ion selective TP074 In-house documented method Dry electrode
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP098 Determination of acid soluble chloride by titrimetry Dry Purposes.
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP099 Determination of water soluble chloride by titrimetry Yes Yes Dry Purposes.
Wisconsin DNR Modified GRO method, Method TP100 Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons/GRO. Yes Yes Wet for Determining Gasoline Range Organics
Determination of Total & Speciated 7 PCB Congeners by TP110 USEPA Methods 8082A & 3665A Yes Yes Wet GC/MS SIM
BS1377, Part 3, 1990: Soils for Civil Engineering TP114 Determination of carbonate in soil (rapid titration method) Dry Purposes.
Extracted petroleum hydrocarbons from TP067 split into TP126 TNRCC Method 1006 (modified) Yes Wet aromatic and aliphatic fractions. Analysed by GC/FID.
TP134 In-house documented method Determination of water soluble chloride by titrimetry Yes Yes Dry
USEPA Methods 8100 & 8270D. Determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons extractable in TP135 Dry In-house method TP045 dichloromethane, by GC/MS (with concentration stage)
Determination of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by TP145 USEPA Methods 3550C & 8270D Yes Yes Wet GC/MS
Determination of total & speciated WHO 12 PCB TP147 USEPA Methods 8082A & 3665A Wet Congeners by GC/MS SIM.
Determination of pesticides and herbicides in soil by TP150 USEPA Methods 8081B & 8141B Dry GC/MS SIM
TP152 USEPA Method 556 Determination of carbonyls in soil by GC/MS. Wet
USEPA Method 5021. Wisconsin DNR modified TP154 Determination of volatiles in soil by GC/MS headspace Yes Selected Wet GRO method
TP158 USEPA Method 1671 Determination of glycols in soil by GC/FID DI Wet
Notes 1. Terra Tek (Birmingham) are MCERTS accredited for clay, sand & loam matrix types only, where they constitute the major component of the sample. Other coarse granular materials, ie gravel, are not accredited where they comprise the major component of the sample. 2. Results are expressed on a dry-weight basis (samples dried at 30°C ± 5°C) except where stated. 3. The laboratory removes any material >2mm prior to analysis. The quantity and nature of any material removed from samples is recorded and the information is available on request. 4. The laboratory records the date of analysis of each parameter. This information is available on request. 5. Where a parameter cannot be determined in house it is our policy to use a UKAS/MCERTS accredited laboratory wherever possible. Terra Tek will assume responsibility for the quality of subcontracted tests and the performance of the subcontractor chosen. Where there is no known UKAS/MCERTS laboratory for a particular parameter, a laboratory listed within the Terra Tek Approved Subcontractors list, which is subject to performance assessment, will be selected.
Checked & Originator Appendix Y Approved SUMMARY OF IN-HOUSE ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS (SOIL) N/A N/A Moor Lane, Witton, Birmingham, B6 7HG Birmingham, Witton, Lane, Moor 13:21:56 : 23/06/2016 B20075 No Project Lab t Sheet 2 of 2 APPENDIX F APPLIED GEOLOGY Page 1 of 4
APPENDIX F
STANDARD FIELDWORK AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
Scope of Work
The scope of work undertaken is defined in Section 1.1 of the Report. It should be noted that Applied Geology Limited does not provide arboricultural surveys or specialist surveys for the detection of invasive plant species (such as Japanese Knotweed) or protected species of wildlife. Information from environmental and ecological datasets is included from a review of the MAGIC (Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside) website, however, if a full assessment of Environmental or Ecological aspects is required, it is recommended that other specialists are consulted. Similarly, information on flood risk is included obtained from the Environment Agency Web site and the GroundSure report but this is not intended to be a full hydrological study and if a flood risk assessment is needed, additional analysis by others is recommended to confirm this aspect of the development.
Fieldwork
Fieldwork is generally carried out, in accordance with BS5930 (1999) “Code of Practice for Site Investigations”, BS10175 Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites, and the Association of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Specialist Guidelines for Good Practice in Site Investigations (August 1998)
Prior to commencement on site, statutory services plans are generally obtained and verbal enquiries are also made regarding the positions of private or statutory services on site. Prior to excavation or drilling, locations are scanned with a cable avoidance tool (CAT) and service pits are generally excavated at borehole positions, where possible.
Descriptions and depths of the various strata recovered are presented on the exploratory hole records, reproduced in the report appendices, together with sample depths, the results of in-situ testing, comments on groundwater inflows, and any other pertinent information. The strata descriptions are in accordance with BS5930:1999 incorporating Amendment No 2 (2010). Disturbed plastic pot and glass amber jar samples are recovered from the various strata and stored and transported in cool boxes, where relevant, for possible future laboratory testing.
Light cable percussion boreholes are generally drilled using a Pilcon Wayfarer or Dando rig and are advanced using equipment to bore 200/150mm diameter boreholes. Disturbed plastic pot samples are recovered from all deposits encountered to allow examination and laboratory testing. Certain strata are cased off due to their tendency to collapse, particularly in the presence of groundwater inflows and/or to reduce the risk of cross contamination. In situ Standard Penetration Tests, using Split Spoon (SPT) and Cone (CPT) are undertaken in the boreholes to provide a measure of the relative density of the granular (coarse grained) deposits or shear strength of the clay/chalk/ weathered rock deposits using industry recognised correlation guidelines of shear strength against SPT “N” value results. Within the fine grained (cohesive) deposits, “undisturbed” 100mm driven open tube samples were recovered from the various deposits to provide samples for examination and laboratory testing. On encountering groundwater, boring is usually suspended for 20 minutes while any rise in water level is recorded. Full details of the groundwater observations and monitoring results during boring operations are included on the borehole records. All boreholes without monitoring wells installed are usually backfilled with arisings upon completion, unless otherwise stated on the individual logs.
Unless otherwise stated on the relevant logs, trial pits are excavated using a wheeled backhoe excavator, usually with a 0.6m wide bucket. The excavations are logged from the ground surface by an Engineering Geologist / Geo-environmental Engineer and relevant field testing, appropriate to the soils encountered, is carried out on samples brought to the surface. Disturbed soil samples are collected from selected horizons for subsequent laboratory testing. The trial pits are usually unshored and where reasonable, left open for a period of time to allow observations of pit stability APPLIED GEOLOGY Page 2 of 4
and depth and inflow rate of any groundwater ingress. The excavations are backfilled with arisings prior to moving on to the next position. Any trial pits carried out as part of this or previous investigations may represent soft spots and conduits/sumps for groundwater or surface water. In excavations, such materials may also be loose and unstable.
Driven Continuous Sampling (DCS) boreholes are drilled using a track mounted Global mini-rig or similar using sampling tubes of varying diameter (decreasing with depth). Samples of the deposits encountered are recovered in 1m long clear plastic liners, which are logged and sub-sampled on site by an Engineering Geologist. Generally for geotechnical investigations, during the drilling process in- situ Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) are undertaken at selected depths to determine the relative density of coarse grained deposits encountered or the in-situ strength of fine grained deposits by comparing the SPT "N" value results with published empirical data. Groundwater seepages are noted during drilling if encountered. All boreholes without monitoring wells installed are usually backfilled with arisings upon completion.
Unless specifically stated in the report, exploratory hole locations should be regarded as approximate. Consideration should be given to accurate location of the exploratory holes where it is considered they may impact on proposed development.
Laboratory Testing
The geotechnical testing was carried out in accordance with BS 1377:1990 Method of Tests for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes and was undertaken by a UKAS accredited specialist laboratory. Chemical testing was undertaken by a UKAS accredited specialist chemical testing laboratory and MCERTS accredited methods, in accordance with Environment Agency recommendations, were specified where available.
Contamination Assessment – Human Health
Applied Geology Limited has followed the guidance given in the CLR 11 publication and other available guidance to assess the contaminant concentrations. Details of the methodology followed are briefly outlined below.
The available chemical data is sorted into appropriate datasets depending on sampling regime and ground conditions. An initial generic quantitative risk assessment is undertaken on this data using statistical tests, where appropriate, and appropriate screening values.
Risk to human health has been initially assessed by comparing soil results against various published screening criteria. These have been sourced from the following, in order of preference:
DEFRA. Category 4 Screening Levels (C4SL), March 2014; LQM/CIEH S4UL for Human Health Risk Assessment (S4UL), 2015*; Environment Agency/DEFRA, Soil Guideline Values (SGV) published in 2009; EIC/AGS/CL:AIRE Soil Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC), 2010; Atkins (ATRISKsoil), Soil Screening Values (SSV), March 2011.
Except for lead and benzo(a)pyrene, the assessments will be carried out by comparing results against the LQM/CIEH S4UL in the first instance, where these values are exceeded, then reference will be made to the C4SLs where such exist. Lead will only be compared to the C4SL because no S4UL exists for lead. For Benzo(a)pyrene, Applied Geology has chosen to adopt the approach presented by the C4SL committee rather than the approach proposed by LQM/CIEH. Further discussion on this is presented below.
*- © Land Quality Management Limited reproduced with permission; Publication Number S4UL3159. All rights reserved
APPLIED GEOLOGY Page 3 of 4
It is our view, and the view of others in the industry, that the C4SL were derived for use in both the Part IIA system and through the planning system, as they allow identification of those sites that fall within Category 4 (not contaminated) and are therefore are able to be developed with no further remedial action. The C4SLs are considered to represent a contamination level that is ‘low’ from a toxicological view point, which we therefore consider to be ‘acceptable’ under planning.
Historically, the level of contamination has been assessed with reference to SGV values which were derived to represent a ‘minimal’ level of contamination. The SGVs are still valid and can be used alongside C4SL, however both screening values are only intended to provide guidance as to the level of contamination and, where concentrations fall below these screening values, the site is not contaminated (and is within Category 4). Exceedance of a SGV/S4UL/C4SL does not automatically indicate that an ‘unacceptable’ risk exists at a site; simply that further consideration of that particular contaminant is required.
At this time, there are two toxicological methodologies that can be used in the derivation of screening criteria for PAHs; Relative Potency Factor (RPFs) or the Surrogate Marker approach. Applied Geology has chosen (based on the latest guidance from the HPA) to use the surrogate marker approach proposed in the C4SL methodology, whereby benzo(a)pyrene can be used as a surrogate marker for all ‘genotoxic’ (gene damaging) PAHs. The surrogate marker approach estimates the toxicity of a mixture of PAHs in an environmental matrix by using data from toxicity studies in which a PAH mixture of known composition was tested. Exposure to the surrogate marker benzo(a)pyrene is assumed to represent exposure to all the PAHs in the environmental matrix. Thus, the level of toxicity ascribed to the surrogate represents the toxicity of the PAH mixture. This allows an assessment of the combined carcinogenic risk associated with genotoxic PAHs using only benzo(a)pyrene.
Contamination Assessment – Controlled Waters
Risks to Controlled Waters have been assessed by following the guidance given in the CLR11 Model Procedures Report (EA 2004) and EA publication “Remedial Targets Methodology. Hydrogeological Risk Assessment for Land Contamination (EA 2006)”.
This guidance presents a recommended methodology comprising several levels of assessment for deriving site-specific remedial objectives (Target Values) for contaminated soils and/ or groundwater in order to protect the aquatic environment. The different levels of assessment are summarised below.
Level Soil Source Groundwater Source 1 Partition into leachate Not applicable
2 As above, plus attenuation in the Direct comparison to unsaturated zone and dilution in appropriate quality standards the aquifer 3 As above, plus lateral attenuation Lateral attenuation in the in the saturated zone to off-site saturated zone to off-site compliance point compliance point *soil leachate extraction test results used if available and appropriate.
Effectively the Level 1 soil and Level 2 groundwater assessments are preliminary. The other level is a detailed assessment requiring the use of suitable software, which is outside the scope of this investigation.
From the available soil, leachate and groundwater results, chemicals of concern are selected which are then directly compared to appropriate published standards. The principal standards used to assess the potential risks to controlled waters are the UK drinking water standards (UK DWS) and the Environment Agency’s Environmental Standards (ES), which are derived for the protection of aquatic life. APPLIED GEOLOGY Page 4 of 4
Waste Soil Disposal
A specific categorisation and assessment of potential waste soils arising from the proposed development has not been undertaken as part of the investigation, unless otherwise detailed in the report text. However, generic comments and advice are made below for the reader.
Any excavated soil material and excess spoil disposed of off-site should be treated as Waste and classified as Inert, Non-hazardous or Hazardous for off-site disposal prior to removal from site as required by the “Duty of Care” (Environmental Protection Act, 1990) legislation together with Annex II of Directive 1999/31/EC (“Landfill Directive”).
All waste soils should be sorted to prevent mixtures of waste types. Where possible, any waste soil should be recycled and the volume of soil to be disposed of should be minimised. Initially, Basic Characterisation of the waste is required whereby the material should be described and its source of origin recorded (a site plan, exploratory hole records and the certificates of chemical analysis in this report should be included).
This should also include data on its composition and leaching behaviour, its European Waste Catalogue (EWC) code, and where relevant any hazardous properties according to Annex III of Directive 91/689/EEC. This information should be provided to the licensed waste contractor.
Soils excavated on many sites would generally fall under the EWC description “Soil and Stones”, EWC code 17 05 04 with restrictions excluding topsoil and peat. Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) testing is required for all other Inert wastes and Hazardous Waste where relevant but not for non- hazardous waste.
Any asbestos must be disposed of by suitably licensed contractors to a suitably licensed facility.
Health & Safety Aspects
As outlined within the HSE publication ‘Successful Health and Safety Management - HSG65’, this report should inform your development of safe systems of work and information as an input into the safety management system.
When developing risk control systems we suggest making reference to the CIRIA report 132 "A guide for safe working on contaminated sites" and the HSE document "Protection of workers and the general public during the development of contaminated land – HSG66". All risk control measures should be in accordance with the guidelines laid down within the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.
The contents of this report may be used to supplement the contents of the Health and Safety File as required under the Construction Design and Management (CDM) Regulations.
Trench support or the angle of batter should be designed by an appropriately qualified engineer or competent person to suit the required depth and the ground and groundwater conditions.
Care should be taken when digging excavations to prevent undermining or causing loss of support to the foundations of the nearby adjoining structures. Surcharging such as from spoil or vehicle movements close to excavation sides should be avoided
Practical guidance on trench excavation is given in CIRIA Report 97 Trenching Practice. Guidance on groundwater control is given in CIRIA Report 113 Control of groundwater for temporary works. Temporary works should be designed by a suitably qualified engineer or a competent person particularly where personnel access is necessary, in accordance with the requirements of the Construction (Design and Management) (CDM) Regulations.