DOCSLIB.ORG

PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #18932 Ratesetting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #18932 Ratesetting ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #18932 Ratesetting Decision __________ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Recover Costs Recorded in the Catastrophic Event Memorandum Application 19-09-012 Account Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 454.9 (U 39 M). DECISION APPROVING PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY’S RECOVERY OF CATASTROPHIC EVENT MEMORANDUM ACCOUNT COSTS PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Summary In this decision, we grant the joint motions of applicant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and intervenors Public Advocates Office (Cal Advocates) and The Utility Reform Network (TURN) to approve and adopt their settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) and for admission of their testimony into the record as evidence, and we approve PG&E’s application pursuant to Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code Section 454.9 to recover incremental costs recorded in its Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account (CEMA) regarding 13 catastrophic events (Events) in 2017 and 2018 in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement’s revenue requirement of $136.7 million for CEMA Events costs reflects a compromise between PG&E’s adjusted revenue requirement request of 349918780 - 1 - A.19-09-012 ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION $157.1 million and the recommended respective revenue requirements of Cal Advocates and TURN of $118.5 million and $121.3 million. The parties’ settlement also reflects agreement regarding the mechanisms for recovery of PG&E’s expense revenue requirement and the revenue requirements associated with Electric Distribution and Gas Distribution capital costs. The admitted evidence establishes that the elements of Pub. Util. Code Section 454.9 for PG&E’s recovery of CEMA Events costs pursuant to the parties’ settlement have been satisfied and that the Settlement Agreement satisfies California Public Utilities Commission Rule of Practice and Procedure 12.1(d) because it is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest. This proceeding is closed. 1. Background On September 13, 2019, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed with the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) its application in this proceeding under Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code Section 454.9 to recover incremental costs recorded in its Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account (CEMA) for 13 events (Events),1 including 12 wildfires and one storm, that occurred in 2017 and 2018. The application requested recovery of $159.3 million in electric revenue requirements based upon $123.6 million of expense and $79.6 million of capital costs incurred by PG&E in responding to the Events. PG&E proposed to recover revenue requirements for Electric Distribution, Gas Distribution, and Gas Transmission expense costs over a 12-month period 1 The Events are commonly referred to as the 2017 Wall Fire, 2017 Alamo Fire, 2017 Whittier Fire, 2017 Detwiler Fire, 2017 Ponderosa Fire, 2017 Mission Fire, 2017 Peak Fire, 2018 March Storms, 2018 Pawnee Fire, 2018 Carr Fire, 2018 Ferguson Fire, 2018 Mendocino Complex Fire, and 2018 Steele Fire. - 2 - A.19-09-012 ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION beginning January 1, 2021 or the next available rate change as part of its Annual Electric True-Up (AET) and Annual Gas True-Up (AGT) advice letter filings, with cost recovery through the Distribution Revenue Adjustment Mechanism, Core Fixed Cost Account, and Noncore Customer Class Charge Account rate mechanisms. PG&E proposed to recover its 2017-2021 capital-related revenue requirements over a 12-month period beginning January 1, 2021 or the next available rate change and to recover its 2022 capital-related revenue requirements in 2022 as part of its AET and AGT advice letter filings. PG&E also proposed to recover capital-related revenue requirements after December 21, 2022 in its General Rate Case (GRC) currently slated for a 2023 Test Year. PG&E submitted opening prepared testimony2 with its application that included the governor’s state of emergency proclamations for the CEMA Events.3 PG&E’s prepared testimony also describes in detail PG&E’s CEMA Events activities in restoring utility services to customers, repairing, replacing, or restoring damaged utility facilities, and complying with governmental agency orders in connection with the CEMA Events.4 In addition, PG&E asserted in its prepared testimony that the CEMA Events costs for which it sought recovery were incremental to costs already recovered through other recovery mechanisms or base rates.5 2 PG&E subsequently identified its opening prepared testimony as Exhibit PGE-01 in the parties’ August 31, 2020 joint motion for admission of the parties’ testimony into the record as evidence. 3 Exhibit PGE-01 Chapter 1, Attachment A. 4 Exhibit PGE-01 Chapters 1-3. 5 Exhibit PGE-01, Chapter 4. - 3 - A.19-09-012 ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION On October 17, 2019, the Public Advocates Office (Cal Advocates) and The Utility Reform Network (TURN) filed protests to the application. The Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (Scoping Memo) filed on December 6, 2019 identified the following issues to be determined: 1. For each CEMA event in which PG&E requests cost recovery, was an official disaster declared by a competent state or federal authority; 2. Whether the CEMA costs that PG&E seeks cost recovery are for: (1) restoring utility service; (2) repairing, restoring, or replacing damaged utility facilities; and (3) complying with governmental agency orders in connection with the events declared disasters, both in terms of geography and the nature of impacts covered by the disaster declaration; 3. Are the recorded CEMA costs reasonable, prudently incurred, and incremental to costs already included or recoverable in other utility accounts; and 4. Is the ratemaking treatment for eligible CEMA costs reasonable? On June 3, 2020, Cal Advocates served its report6 regarding the CEMA Events recommending that the Commission reduce PG&E’s requested expense costs by $20.589 million and PG&E’s requested capital costs by $28.803 million, resulting in a recommended revenue requirement of $118.5 million. In the report, Cal Advocates recommended reductions of $5.449 million in expense and $4.421 million in capital for straight-time labor and $15.140 million in expense and $24.382 million in capital related to overheads, burdens, and paid time off 6 The report is dated June 4, 2020. Cal Advocates subsequently identified the report as Exhibit PAO-01 in the parties’ August 31, 2020 joint motion for admission of the parties’ testimony into the record as evidence. - 4 - A.19-09-012 ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION because those costs were already built into PG&E’s current rates and PG&E had failed to show it had not already recovered those costs in rates.7 On June 4, 2020, TURN served its report8 regarding the CEMA Events recommending that the Commission reduce PG&E’s requested expense costs by $23.278 million and PG&E’s requested capital costs by $28.936 million, resulting in a recommended revenue requirement of $121.3 million. In the report, TURN recommended reductions of $5.417 million in expense and $4.323 million in capital for straight-time labor and $17.861 million in expense and $24.613 million in capital related to selected overheads because those costs were not incremental, were not justified, and were already included in PG&E’s GRC filing.9 In rebuttal testimony,10 PG&E again asserted the incrementality of its claimed costs to costs already included in rates through the GRC, stating that PG&E had reduced its GRC forecast to account for CEMA Events costs.11 After discussions with Cal Advocates and TURN, PG&E identified $1.9 million in expense costs and $0.3 million in capital costs related to the Mendocino Complex Fire that exceeded actual vendors’ billings. PG&E agreed to remove those costs from its requested revenue requirement, resulting in a reduction of PG&E’s requested revenue requirement from $159.3 million to $157.1 million. 7 Exhibit PAO-01 at 5-6. 8 TURN subsequently identified the report as Exhibit TURN-01 in the parties’ August 31, 2020 joint motion for admission of the parties’ testimony into the record as evidence. 9 Exhibit TURN-01 at 1-12. 10 PG&E subsequently identified its rebuttal testimony as Exhibit PGE-03 in the parties’ August 31, 2020 joint motion for admission of the parties’ testimony into the record as evidence. 11 Exhibit PGE-03 at 2. - 5 - A.19-09-012 ALJ/PWI/mph PROPOSED DECISION 2. Settlement PG&E, Cal Advocates, and TURN negotiated to attempt to resolve the issues raised by the application. Those negotiations resulted in a settlement conference on August 25, 2020 noticed in accordance with Commission Rule of Practice and Procedure (Rule) 12.1(b). The three parties entered into a settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) executed by PG&E on August 25, 2020 and by Cal Advocates and TURN on August 28, 2020 and attached to this decision as Appendix A. Paragraph 4.2 of the Settlement Agreement provides that PG&E’s total revenue requirement for the CEMA Events is $136.7 million reflecting $105.8 million of expense costs and $69 million of capital costs (Settlement Costs); with interest, the expense revenue requirement is $112 million and the capital revenue requirement for 2017 through 2022 is $24.7 million. Under Paragraph 4.3 of the Settlement Agreement, Settlement Costs will be recovered in the same manner as other electric distribution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Us Pharmacy Cialis
    2018 HOTZONE Scholarships as of August 24, 2018 Type Last Scholarship Applicant\'s Name: Title: Organization: City State FULL Abbey Teddy Abbey Battalion Chief Fort Smith Fire Department Fort Smith AR FULL Adair Robert Adair Instructor Oklahoma State University Fire Service Training Stillwater OK FULL Adkinson Kelly Adkinson Captain Tyler Fire Tyler TX FULL Alexander Rebecca Alexander Firefighter Westhoff Volunteer Fire Department Westhoff TX FULL Aragon Julius Aragon Captain Santa Fe Fire Department Sant Fe NM FULL Ardoin Christopher Ardoin HazMat Corporal Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office Shreveport LA FULL Arispe Carlos Arispe Deputy Fire Chief Pharr Fire Dept Pharr TX FULL Ator Paultor Ator HazMat Coordinator Tulsa Fire Department Vera OK FULL Bailey Robert Bailey Fire Fighter/EMT Bellmead Fire Department Bellmead TX FULL Baker Ryan Baker Firefighter Killeen Fire Department Copperas Cove TX FULL Baker, Jr. Calvin Baker, Jr. Training Officer Shreveport Fire Department Shreveport LA FULL Bannister Jason Bannister HazMat Coordinator St Tammany Fire District 1 Slidell LA FULL Bates Joe Bates Engineer / EMT Horseshoe Bay Fire Department Horseshoe Bay TX FULL Battley Paris Battley Captain PCPFD5 New Roads LA FULL Bayer Clifton Bayer Battalion Chief Victoria Fire Department Goliad TX FULL Becker Jackie Becker Firefighter/Paramedic/Hazmat Tech Guymon Fire Dept Guymon OK FULL Bennett Amanda Bennett Fire Specialist Austin Fire Department Austin TX FULL Berry Joshua Berry Firefighter Sulphur Fire Department Sulphur LA FULL Bertie Jason Bertie Firefighter/Paramedic
    [Show full text]
  • P-19-CA-06-0DD2 January 1, 2021 Thru March 31, 2021 Performance
    Grantee: California Grant: P-19-CA-06-0DD2 January 1, 2021 thru March 31, 2021 Performance Grant Number: Obligation Date: Award Date: P-19-CA-06-0DD2 Grantee Name: Contract End Date: Review by HUD: California Original - In Progress Grant Award Amount: Grant Status: QPR Contact: $1,017,399,000.00 Active No QPR Contact Found LOCCS Authorized Amount: Estimated PI/RL Funds: $0.00 $0.00 Total Budget: $1,017,399,000.00 Disasters: Declaration Number FEMA-4382-CA FEMA-4407-CA Narratives Disaster Damage: 2018 was the deadliest year for wildfires in California’s history. In August 2018, the Carr Fire and the Mendocino Complex Fire erupted in northern California, followed in November 2018 by the Camp and Woolsey Fires. These were the most destructive and deadly of the dozens of fires to hit California that year. In total, it is estimated over 1.6 million acres burned during 2018. The Camp Fire became California’s deadliest wildfire on record, with 85 fatalities. 1. July-September 2018 Wildfires (DR-4382) At the end of July 2018, several fires ignited in northern California, eventually burning over 680,000 acres. The Carr Fire, which began on July 23, 2018, was active for 164 days and burned 229,651 acres in total, the majority of which were in Shasta County. It is estimated that 1,614 structures were destroyed, and eight fatalities were confirmed. The damage caused by this fire is estimated at approximately $1.659 billion. Over a year since the fire, the county and residents are still struggling to rebuild, with the construction sector pressed beyond its limit with the increased demand.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept
    FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept. Adair Bell Rural Fire Department Inc Adair Chance Community Fire Department Inc. Adair Christie Proctor Fire Association Adair Greasy Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Adair Hwy 100 West Fire Protection Adair Hwy 51 West Rural Fire District, Inc. Adair Mid County Rural Fire Dept. Inc. Adair Town of Stilwell for Stilwell Fire Department Adair Town of Watts for Watts Fire Department Adair Town of Westville for Westville Fire Department Adair City of Cherokee for Cherokee Fire Department Alfalfa Nescatunga Rural Fire Association Alfalfa Town of Aline for Aline Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Burlington for Burlington Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Byron for A&B Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Carmen for Carmen Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Goltry for Goltry Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Helena for Helena Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Jet for Jet Fire Department Alfalfa Bentley Volunteer Fire District Atoka City of Atoka for Atoka Fire Department Atoka Crystal Volunteer Fire Department Association Atoka Daisy Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Atoka Farris Fire District Atoka Harmony Fire Department Atoka Hopewell Community Firefighters Association Atoka Lane Volunteer Fire Department Association Atoka Town of Caney for Caney Fire Department Atoka Town of Stringtown for Stringtown Fire Department Atoka Town of Tushka for Tushka Fire Department Atoka Wards Chapel Fire Department, Inc. Atoka Wardville Rural Volunteer Fire Dept. Atoka Wilson Community Rural Fire Association
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • From Heavy Metals to COVID-19, Wildfire Smoke Is More Dangerous Than You Think 26 July 2021, by Hayley Smith
    From heavy metals to COVID-19, wildfire smoke is more dangerous than you think 26 July 2021, by Hayley Smith fire was particularly noxious because it contained particulates from burned homes as well as vegetation—something officials fear will become more common as home-building pushes farther into the state's wildlands. Another study linked wildfire smoke to an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. The findings indicate that as fire season ramps up, the dangers of respiratory illness and other serious side effects from smoke loom nearly as large as the flames. The 2018 Camp fire was the deadliest wildfire on Credit: CC0 Public Domain record in California. At least 85 people died, and nearly 19,000 buildings were destroyed, mostly in Paradise. When Erin Babnik awoke on the morning of Nov. 8, The fire also generated a massive plume of heavy 2018, in Paradise, California, she thought the smoke that spewed dangerously high levels of reddish glow outside was a hazy sunrise. pollution into the air for about two weeks, according to a study released this month by the California Air But the faint light soon gave way to darkness as Resources Board. smoke from the burgeoning Camp fire rolled in. Researchers examined data from air filters and "The whole sky turned completely black, and there toxic monitors to determine that smoke from the fire were embers flying around," Babnik recalled. "I was in many ways more harmful than that of three remember it smelling horrible." other large fires that burned mostly vegetation that year—the Carr fire, the Mendocino Complex fire and She hastily evacuated to nearby Chico with little the Ferguson fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Signed By. Kris Cook
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46(REV 08/17) Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. FY 2019-20 4260 Health Care Services Budget Request Name Program Subprogram 4260-402-BCP-2019-MR 3960 3960050 Budget Request Description SUD Emerging Epidemics, Disaster Response and Licensing Workload Budget Request Summary The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Substance Use Disorder Compliance Division (SUDCD), requests 7.0 permanent positions and expenditure authority of $1,060,000 (100% Residential and Outpatient Program Licensing Fund (ROPLF)), in fiscal year (FY) 2019-20, to address the increased workload of responding to: 1) natural disasters and other State Emergencies; 2) the opioid epidemic; 3) the resurgence of methamphetamine abuse; and 4) the rise in number of treatment facilities. In addition, DHCS requests a one-time expense of $100,000 from General Fund (GF) to migrate DHCS's disaster collection and reporting process into the web-based reporting platform, NC4 through an interagency agreement with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed • Yes • No Does this BCP contain information technology (IT) Department QIC Date components? • Yes El No If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign. For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document (FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date. Project No. Project Approval Document: Approval Date: If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? • Yes • No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire in Nj 2006
    Division of Fire Safety State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs FIREFIREFIRE INININ NEWNEWNEW JERSEYJERSEYJERSEY 20062006 Cover photograph courtesy of Rodman Meyer DEDICATION We honor the firefighters who selflessly gave their lives to protect the citizens of their communities. Edward Marbet Burlington Township Fire Department Robert “Ockie” Wisting Rio Grande Fire Company # 1 Kevin A. Apuzzio East Franklin Volunteer Fire Department Vincent R. Neglia North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue Department Thomas J. Van Liew New Brunswick Fire Department FIRE IN NEW JERSEY 2006 DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY Lawrence Petrillo, Director/State Fire Marshal PREPARED BY: Heather Puskar, Supervisor Fire Incident Reporting Unit New Jersey Division of Fire Safety P.O. Box 809 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 (609) 324-7715 CONGRATULATIONS TO THE FOLLOWING COUNTIES FOR 100% PARTICIPATION BURLINGTON CAMDEN CAPE MAY GLOUCESTER HUDSON MERCER PASSAIC SALEM 6 www.nj.gov/dca/dfs TABLE OF CONTENTS NFIRS CONTACT INFORMATION 8 REPORT CONTENTS 9 NEW CATEGORY INFORMATION 10 FAST STATS 11 FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSES 12 RESPONSES BY COUNTY 13 PROPERTY USE INCIDENT TOTALS BY COUNTY 34 INCIDENT TYPES WITH PROPERTY/CONTENTS LOSS/VALUE 37 FREQUENCY OF INCIDENT TYPES BY MONTH 40 FIRES BY TYPE 76 STRUCTURE FIRES BY MONTH 76 STRUCTURE FIRES BY DAY OF WEEK 76 FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO IGNITION 77 FIRE SUPPRESSION FACTORS 77 STRUCTURE FIRES BY PROPERTY TYPE 78 RESIDENTIAL FIRES 79 HEAT SOURCES OF RESIDENTIAL FIRES 80 DORMITORY FIRES 82-83 AREA OF FIRE ORIGIN 84 CAUSE OF IGNITION 88 DETECTOR PRESENCE & PERFORMANCE 92 CIVILIAN FIRE FATALITIES 98 CIVILIAN FIRE INJURIES 102 FIREFIGHTER INJURIES & FATALITIES 104 SCHOOL FIRES 107 VEHICLE FIRES 112 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASES 114 WILDLAND FIRES 116 SPECIAL STUDIES 118 INVESTIGATION UNIT STATISTICAL REPORT 119 FIRE DEPARTMENT PARTICIPATION 120 COUNTY REPORTING PERCENTAGES 139 www.nj.gov/dca/dfs 77 NFIRS CONTACT INFORMATION NFIRS staff is available to assist fire departments with NFIRS training and technical support.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Dept Name City, State/Province, Zip Code 2 1/2" FDC Locking Cap 2
    2 1/2" FDC Locking Cap w/ Standpipe Fire Dept Name City, State/Province, Zip Code 2 1/2" FDC Locking Cap 1 1/2" FDC Locking Cap Swivel Guard Locks KX3114 - FD 3.000 x 8.0 KX3115 - FD 3.000 x 8.0 KX4013 - FD Olds Town Fire Dept Olds, AB, T4H 1R5 - (marked 8.0 x 3.000) (marked 8.0 x 3.000) 3.000 x 8.0 Key West Security & Alarms Rocky Mountain House, AB, T4T KX3114 - FD 3.000 x 8.0 KX3115 - FD 3.000 x 8.0 KX4013 - FD - Inc 1B7 (marked 8.0 x 3.000) (marked 8.0 x 3.000) 3.000 x 8.0 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH 1.990 x 9.0 KX4011 - NH Anchorage (Muni) Fire Dept Anchorage, AK, 99507-1554 (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 9.0 x 1.990) 3.068 x 7.5 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH 1.990 x 9.0 KX4011 - NH Capital City Fire & Rescue Juneau, AK, 99801-1845 (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 9.0 x 1.990) 3.068 x 7.5 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH 1.990 x 9.0 KX4011 - NH Kenai Fire Dept Kenai, AK, 99611-7745 (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 9.0 x 1.990) 3.068 x 7.5 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH 1.990 x 9.0 KX4011 - NH Kodiak City Fire Dept Kodiak, AK, 99615-6352 (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 9.0 x 1.990) 3.068 x 7.5 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH 1.990 x 9.0 KX4011 - NH Tok Vol Fire Dept Tok, AK, 99780-0076 (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 7.5 x 3.068) (marked 9.0 x 1.990) 3.068 x 7.5 KX3110 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3111 - NH 3.068 x 7.5 KX3190 - NH
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept
    FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept. Stilwell Airport Road Fire Support Incorporated Bartlesville Albany Volunteer Fire Department Albany Albion Fire Department Association Albion Alden Fire Department Association Carnegie Alfalfa Rural Fire Company Carnegie Arlington Volunteer Fire Dept. Incorporated Prague Arrowhead Estates Voluntary Fire Department, Inc. Canadian Ash Creek Community Fire Department Inc. Wilburton Ashland Volunteer Fire Dept Association Stuart Baker Fire Protection Association Turpin Bar C Rural Fire Department, Inc Burbank Barnsdall Rural Fire Association Incorporated Barnsdall Basin Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Mannford Bear Creek Rural Fire District Association Kaw City Bee Community Volunteer Fire Department Association Kenefic Bell Rural Fire Department Inc Stilwell Bengal Fire Department Assn Wister Bennington Community Rural Volunteer Fire Department Assoc. Bennington Bennington Bentley Volunteer Fire District Atoka Berlin Volunteer Fire Association Sayre Berryhill Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Tulsa Bethel Road Fire Department Association Lawton Big 4 Rural Fire District Association Kingfisher Big Beaver Fire Department Inc. Shidler Big Bend Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Ralston Big Cedar Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. Muse Black Dog Fire Association Tulsa Blackburn Rural Fire Department Pawnee Blackgum Mountain Fire Department Vian Blackland Fire Corporation Pawhuska Blue Volunteer Fire Association McAlester Bluff Fire Department Inc Soper Boggy Fire Department Association Red Oak Boulanger Rural Fire Dept. Inc. Pawhuska Bowlin Springs Fire Protection Association Chelsea Brent Rural Fire District Inc. Sallisaw Bridge Creek Fire Fighters Association Blanchard Brooken Volunteer Fire Department Stigler Brooksville Volunteer Fire Dept Corporation Tecumseh Broxton Fire Dept. Company Assn. Fort Cobb Brushy Mt. Vol. Fire Dept. Muskogee Brushy Mt.-Sequoyah Co.
    [Show full text]
  • State Firemen's and Fire Marshals' Association
    PROCEEDINGS of the ONE HUNDRED FORTYFIRST ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE AND CONVENTION of the STATE FIREMEN’S AND FIRE MARSHALS’ ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS Held in San Marcos, Texas June 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, 2017 2017 PROCEEDINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS Officers..............................................................................................1 Life Members................................................................................16 Convention Cities and Past Presidents.....................................19 Honorary Members.....................................................................23 Honorary Life Members.............................................................23 Firefighter of the Year.................................................................24 EMS Responder of the Year ......................................................24 2016/2017 Boards.........................................................................25 2016/2017 Committees ..............................................................28 Memorial Service.........................................................................40 Opening Business Session........................................................54 *TFBI Presentation * Host City Official Welcome * MDA’s Report * * Past Presidents’ Recognition * TFA Recognition* * VFIS/Texas Mutual Grant Presentation * * TEEX Report * TFS Report * FFOY and EMS Responder of the Year Presentation * President’s Report * Constitution and By-Laws Proposals * Board Nominations * *President’s Tribute * Closing
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan
    Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 MMU Strategic Fire Plan Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Section Date Numbers Description of Update Updated By Updated Updated 4/2020 Contents Page i-ii 2020 Update P4224 4/2020 Signature Page 1 Annual Update P4224 4/2020 Executive 2 Update C4200 Summary 4/2020 I Update P4224 4/2020 II None P4224 4/2020 III Update P4224 4/2020 IV Update B4220 4/2020 IV (B) Update F4208 3/2020 V Update All Battalions 4/2020 Appendix A Update P4224 4/2020 Appendix B None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-1 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-2 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix D None B4220 4/2020 Appendix E Update B4220 3/2020 Appendix F New P4224 4/2020 Appendix G Update B4211 3/2020 Appendix H None B4212 3/2020 Appendix I Update B4214 4/2020 Appendix J None B4215 4/2020 Appendix K None B16 4/2020 Appendix L None B17 3/2020 Appendix M Update B18 4/2020 Appendix N Update D4206 4/2020 Exhibits: Maps None GIS 4/2020 Accomplishments Update Various i Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 Table of Contents UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS ............................................................. i Table of Contents .............................................................................................................ii SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]