Distributed Mechanical Actuation of Percussion Instruments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distributed Mechanical Actuation of Percussion Instruments Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, May 31-June 3, 2015 Distributed Mechanical Actuation of Percussion Instruments Eric Sheffield Michael Gurevich University of Michigan University of Michigan Department of Performing Arts Technology Department of Performing Arts Technology School of Music, Theatre & Dance School of Music, Theatre & Dance Ann Arbor, Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT strings [12]. Similar electromagnetic systems have been applied to a This paper describes a system for interactive mechanically actuated Fender Rhodes [17], the electric guitar [15], and the vibraphone [3]. percussion. Design principles regarding seamless control and In the transducer-driven category are instruments like the Overtone retention of natural acoustic properties are established. Performance Fiddle [14] and the EMDrum [16]. It could be argued that these patterns on a preliminary version are examined, including the examples are in fact still electromagnetic in that they use voice coils potential for cooperative and distributed performance. as the excitation method, but a major distinction from purely electromagnetic systems is that the transducer is mechanically coupled to the instrument. In the Overtone Fiddle, this is done with a Author Keywords transducer attached to the body of a violin, while the EMDrum’s NIME, percussion, actuated instrument, augmented instrument transducer is coupled to the drum membranes using a rod that extends through the center of the moving coil. ACM Classification Perhaps a subset or extension of the electromagnetic and H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation] User Interfaces transducer-driven categories are feedback systems that can be used in J.5 [Arts and Humanities] Performing Arts conjunction with an input device, such as a contact mic, to create feedback loops at resonant frequencies. Processing, commonly in the form of bandpass filters, can be used within the loop to accentuate 1. INTRODUCTION specific harmonics. A popular guitar accessory, the Ebow, employs The recent proliferation of actuated acoustic instruments presents this technique, though it has also been applied to some of the intriguing potential for expanding the available gestures and timbres aforementioned actuated instruments, among others [e.g. 15, 16]. on instruments that already have an established performance practice Bowers and Haas’s “Hybrid Resonant Assemblages,” which share and repertoire. Since most implementations of actuation operate by some aesthetic characteristics with the world of multi-percussion in amplifying and reinforcing natural resonances in the instruments, the the use of found objects and performer-designed instruments, create world of non-pitched percussion has seen little development in this feedback loops with a fixed base and a malleable superstructure [4]. area; what does exist tends to focus on robotic musicianship. In this The properties of the feedback change as the performer manipulates paper, we present a non-robotic performance system of mechanical the tins, jars, boxes, Petri dishes, and other objects used as actuation that does not rely on acoustic resonance, thus opening the superstructure elements. door to any percussion instrument, including those found, assembled, Much of the development of mechanically actuated instruments or designed by the performer. We describe the principles that has centered on robotic music systems. Kapur provides a survey of influenced our interaction and mechanical design. Finally, we robotic instruments from multiple instrument families, including document performance gestures that we saw emerge in pianos, turntables, percussion, string, and wind instruments in [10]. In demonstrations on an initial implementation of the system, which the same paper, he defines the robotic instrument as “a sound-making suggest directions for future development of similar systems. device that automatically creates music with the use of mechanical parts, such as motors, solenoids and gears.” This level of autonomy, 2. ACTUATED INSTRUMENTS though a key component of robotic musical instruments, can exist Actuated instruments have recently received significant attention in with varying degrees of human input. The robotic Indian drummer NIME and related communities. Examples from multiple instrument MahaDeviBot pulls rhythmic patterns from a database derived from families utilize excitation techniques that generally fall into three pre-recorded examples and live input from human drummers [11]. It categories: electromagnetic, transducer-driven, and mechanical. also reacts to sensor and tempo tracking data from a human There is insufficient scope to comprehensively enumerate examples performing on the ESitar. Shimon, the four-armed marimba playing in each category here; rather, we discuss a few of the projects that robot with a pseudo-anthropomorphic head, automatically were influential in our work. improvises chords, rhythms, and melodies in sync with a human Electromagnetic actuation has perhaps seen the richest player [9]. development to date. Electromagnets placed near a ferromagnetic Non-robotic mechanically actuated instruments, that is, devices material, such as a steel string, are driven with amplified signals to that depend on human input to function and do not generate material induce acoustic vibration. A variety of signals may be used, from sine of their own, have probably received the least attention to date. tones to white noise to recorded samples, with differing results. The RobotHands uses human performance input on a NovInt Falcon strongest responses are achieved when the source sound contains force-feedback device to transmit real-time and recorded gestures energy at a resonant frequency of the actuated object. There are through a virtual connection [15]. An interesting aspect of currently at least two versions of pianos augmented with addressable RobotHands is that performance information can be sent electromagnetic actuators [2,12]. McPherson details strategies to simultaneously to multiple devices from a remote location. A similar improve this system using low-cost components that can cover the project, Stapleton and Davis’ Ambiguous Devices, approaches entire range of the keyboard and a signal processing method to mechanical actuation as a means to transmit the gestures or ensure that signals remain phase-locked with the motion of the “presence” of the performers across locations on a single distributed 11 Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, May 31-June 3, 2015 musical instrument in which the input and output does not experiments were conducted with various audio source signals to necessarily have a one-to-one relationship [18]. For example, a strike excite the steel, including prerecorded audio samples and live input on a percussive instrument on one end may cause a turntable motor from a voice and guitar. As expected, and as is mentioned in [12], to spin on the other. Gurevich’s Stringtrees distributes performance results are very weak unless the excitation source signal contains between a mechanical actuator—a central rotating plectrum-arm— significant energy at a resonant frequency of the instrument. With our and human performers who can both adjust the speed of the rotation sample of untreated scrap metal, these resonances did not necessarily and manipulate the strings as they are struck by the plectrum-arm [8]. conform to concert tuning or the harmonic series, nor were they particularly narrowband, so while explorations with voice produced 3. MOTIVATION some interesting results when searching in microtonal steps and For the current project, we were primarily interested in exploring sweeps, similar to those achieved with sine tones in the original non-robotic mechanical actuation. This was born in part out of design, results from other sources were lackluster. frustration with the limitations of our first foray into actuated Appropriation of found objects and materials is a common instruments, a device called Metal Mirror. This instrument is built phenomenon in the world of percussion. In these instances, the from a large 2’X3’ sheet of scrap steel actuated by a surface-mounted unique timbres resulting from indistinct or weak resonances, a transducer and amplified with a contact microphone. The sheet of departure from the expertly tuned bars of marimbas and vibraphones, steel is suspended from a low wooden frame, putting the performer in are usually the aim of the instrument search. Indeed, a great deal of a meditative kneeling position face-to-face with the metal (see Figure standard percussion repertoire requires the performer to essentially 1). The transducer is driven with sine tones generated in a Max patch build an instrument out of found parts. For example, John Cage’s that also uses a webcam to track the positions of blocks that can be 27’10. 554” for a Percussionist asks the percussionist to build a setup magnetically attached and moved around the surface of the sheet. By from metal, wood, and skin. In the more recent Anvil Chorus by moving these blocks, the performer has control over subtle David Lang, the composer specifies only: “three resonant metals, adjustments to the tuning and amplitude of the sine tones. Since the four non-resonant metals, four foot pedal-operated non-resonant scrap material was not tuned or modified outside of a few holes metals, one foot
Recommended publications
  • Magpick: an Augmented Guitar Pick for Nuanced Control
    Magpick: an Augmented Guitar Pick for Nuanced Control Fabio Morreale Andrea Guidi Andrew McPherson Creative Arts and Industries Centre For Digital Music Centre For Digital Music University of Auckland, Queen Mary University of Queen Mary University of New Zealand London, UK London, UK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper introduces the Magpick, an augmented pick for electric guitar that uses electromagnetic induction to sense the motion of the pick with respect to the permanent mag- nets in the guitar pickup. The Magpick provides the gui- tarist with nuanced control of the sound that coexists with traditional plucking-hand technique. The paper presents three ways that the signal from the pick can modulate the guitar sound, followed by a case study of its use in which 11 guitarists tested the Magpick for five days and composed a piece with it. Reflecting on their comments and experi- Figure 1: The Magpick is composed of two parts: a ences, we outline the innovative features of this technology hollow body (black) and a cap (brass). from the point of view of performance practice. In partic- ular, compared to other augmentations, the high tempo- ral resolution, low latency, and large dynamic range of the The challenge is to find ways to sense the movement of Magpick support a highly nuanced control over the sound. the pick with respect to the guitar with high resolution, Our discussion highlights the utility of having the locus of high dynamic range, and low latency, then use the resulting augmentation coincide with the locus of interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Guitar Resonator GR-Junior II
    Guitar Resonator GR-Junior II User Manual Copyright © by Vibesware, all rights reserved. www.vibesware.com Rev. 1.0 Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................1 1.1 How does it work ? ...............................................................................1 1.2 Differences to the EBow and well known Sustainers ............................2 2 Fields of application .................................................................................3 2.1 Feedback playing everywhere / composing / recording ........................3 2.2 On stage ...............................................................................................3 2.3 New ways of playing .............................................................................4 3 Start-Up of the GR-Junior .........................................................................5 4 Playing techniques ...................................................................................5 4.1 Basics ...................................................................................................5 4.2 Harmonics control by positioning the Resonator ...................................6 4.3 Changing harmonics by phase shifting .................................................6 4.4 Some string vibration basics .................................................................6 4.5 Feedback of multiple strings .................................................................9 4.6 Limits of playing, pickup selection,
    [Show full text]
  • Player's Guide
    Player’s Guide Contents Imitations Flute...................................................................................6 Introduction Cello ..................................................................................6 Horn ...................................................................................6 How the EBow Works ........................................................2 Harmonica .........................................................................6 Opening Tips .....................................................................2 Energy Slide ......................................................................6 Switch Positions ................................................................2 Distortion Pick....................................................................6 How to Hold the EBow.......................................................2 How to Position the EBow .................................................2 Other Grips Methods of Control Reverse Grip .....................................................................7 Thumb Grip........................................................................7 String Activation .................................................................3 Finger Grip.........................................................................7 Gliding ...............................................................................3 Pressing.............................................................................3 Review Tilting .................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • BOSS GT-3 FAQ Table of Contents
    BOSS GT-3 FAQ Table of Contents Questions from Prospective Owners Q: What type of guitar works best with the GT-3? What type of pickups? Q: What kind of Amp works best with the GT-3? Q: Where can I hear examples of the GT-3? Q: How does GT3 Compare against POD? Q: How does GT3 Compare against RP-7? Q: How does GT3 Compare against RP-14D? Q: What are differences between GT-3 and GT-5? Q: Can I use the pedals to turn individual effects on and off (manual mode)? Q: Can I use the GT-3 with my electro/acoustic? Q: Where can I get the best price on GT-3? General Questions Q: Does anyone know if there are ROM? upgrades available for the GT-3? What is the latest chip version and how would I check what version mine is? Q: What PC software is available for the GT-3? Q: What MAC software is available for the GT-3? Q: Where can I get good patches? Q: Where can I upload patches? Q: Can I use GT-5 patches? Q: What should I use for a gig bag or case? Q: What is the deal with Brass Eagle Paintball Case? Q: What is Manual Mode? Q: Is there a way I can get the GT-3 to work like stompboxes, so that each of the pedals will control an effect? Q: In Manual mode, is it only possible to have one set of pedal assignments for all patches? Connections Q: How do I hook this thing up to my amp? Q: How do I hook up to a computer (for recording)? Q: How do I hook this up to a computer (for patch download)? Q: What kind of cable do I need for MIDI? Where can I find one? Q: What is the 4 cable method? What is the 5 cable method? What is the difference? Q: How do I hook up an external stompbox in the OD/DS loop? BOSS GT-3 FAQ Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonic Screwdriver’, Meant for Implementation in Iterations of Daniël Maalman’S Lost & Found Orchestra Sound Art Installations
    Abstract This thesis showcases the development process of a tool for achieving a sustained, non-percussive sound that captures the sonic essence of ceramic objects, a so-called ‘sonic screwdriver’, meant for implementation in iterations of Daniël Maalman’s Lost & Found Orchestra sound art installations. The tool is meant to use a different way of sound excitation than Maalman’s conventional method of simply tapping objects with cores of solenoids. This is done by means of creating an audio feedback loop on the surface of the objects, which allows the objects speak in their own voice by using its resonant frequencies in an audio feedback loop. The audio feedback loop is composed of a contact microphone, a surface transducer and an audio amplifier. The system achieves accurate pitch control of the audio feedback at the resonant frequencies of an object by means of a control signal being input into the audio feedback loop via a second surface transducer. The developed solution can be used as a powerful tool in the creation of many types of sound art. 1 Quinten Tenger | Creative Technology | University of Twente | 2019 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank Daniël Maalman for giving me the opportunity to work on this project, inspiring me with his way of working and being available to answer questions day and night. It has been a truly interesting and rewarding challenge. Furthermore, I would like to thank Edwin Dertien for helping me stay on track in times of confusion and frustration and his continuous support and guidance, as well as Erik Faber’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Implement a Chorus Effect in a Real-Time Embedded System
    Universitat Polit`ecnicade Catalunya (UPC) Escola T`ecnicaSuperior d'Enginyeria de Telecomunicaci´ode Barcelona (ETSETB) Implement a chorus effect in a real-time embedded system by Gerard Amposta Boquera Advisor: Asunci´onMoreno Bilbao Barcelona, September 2016 \I was left with an urge to make the guitar sound like things it shouldn't be able to sound like." Adrian Belew (1949 - ) Universitat Polit`ecnicade Catalunya (UPC) Abstract Escola T`ecnicaSuperior d'Enginyeria de Telecomunicaci´ode Barcelona (ETSETB) Departament de Teoria del Senyal i Comunicacions by Gerard Amposta Boquera An implementation of a chorus effect in an embedded device has been devised. Some objective and subjective qualities of this implementation have been analyzed, with the purpose of being tested for their adequacy for usage in the music industry. These qualities include, but are not limited to: maximum delay, number of delayed copies of the original signal, waveshape of the signal modulating the delay, dependency of parameters of the modulating signal from parameters from the input signal, adaptability of the architecture to accommodate further effects without increasing significantly resources usage. It is encountered that a scientific approach to this study has either not been taken, or the results of this research are privately held, therefore being adequate to start this research for the public interest. The system has been implemented in a dsPIC33FJ256GP506 digital signal controller using a standard development board, and results show that this is a promising approach that could be industrializable using audio-grade components for the analog stages and a slightly more powerful DSC. Acknowledgements When my family and friends finally managed to overcome my stubbornness and con- vinced me to put it together and write this thesis, I knew what I was heading into was though.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright The Electric Guitar in Contemporary Art Music Zane Mackie Banks A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sydney Conservatorium of Music Sydney University 2013 Statement of Originality I declare that the research presented here is my own original work and has not been submitted to any other institution for the award of a degree. Signed: …………………………………………………………………………… Date: ………………………………………………………………………………. Abstract Since 1950 the electric guitar has occupied an ever-increasing presence in contemporary art music both as a solo and chamber instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Tandem Performance Through New Instrument Design and Implementation
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 5-2021 Captain and Stoker: Exploring Tandem Performance Through New Instrument Design and Implementation Matthew Spady Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Part of the Music Performance Commons, Music Practice Commons, and the Other Music Commons This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. California State University, Monterey Bay Captain and Stoker Exploring Tandem Performance Through New Instrument Design and Implementation Matthew Spady MPA 475: Senior Capstone Lanier Sammons 4th March 2021 Spady 1 Since the widespread adoption of electric instruments (most notably guitars) in the early 1950s, many players have enjoyed tailoring their sound by carefully selecting transducers, amplifiers, and standalone effects units. Typically, the instrumentalists whose sound these devices affect manage their acquisition, installation, and operation themselves, with many modern amplifiers and effects units offering hands-free control to facilitate this approach. Some players, however, seek other performers to manipulate said devices. In doing so, they create a scenario where two performers operate discrete pieces of equipment to achieve a single, sounding result. Performances that involve this sort of cooperation are tandem; each player’s actions depend on the other’s to be heard, with the auxiliary performer’s work immediately following the primary’s preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure 20.Cdr
    Plus Features > Two Modes of Play > Great New Tone > Killer Harmonic Setting > Smooth Envelope Control > Instant Response > Easy Arpeggios > Cool Blue LED Direct String What a Concept The Test of Time Synthesis The EBow is a totally unique guitar Since 1976, the EBow has been making The principle is simple: a focused accessory. It's not just an effect like the many music. Groups such as U2, Blondie, Elton feedback loop directed at a single string. plug-in devices on the market. The EBow John, Van Halen, Phil Collins, Queen, REO This produces a powerful, infinite sustain, does its work on the string itself by producing Speedwagon, David Bowie and Blue Oyster rich in harmonics for incredible guitar an energy field that can vibrate and sustain Cult have thrilled their listeners with the sounds. It's similar to amplifier feedback but your guitar string for days, but infinite sustain sounds of the EBow. More recently, groups with greater control and predictability, at any is just the beginning. such as Pearl Jam, Kings X, R.E.M. and volume, even through headphones. Powered by a 9 volt battery, the EBow is Smashing Pumpkins have taken up the Complete control over attack, decay and held in place of your pick, giving you instant cause. The applications for the EBow are dynamics, as well as a whole new range of access to violin, cello, flute and horn sounds diverse. Buddy Emmons uses his on steel tones and textures, make the EBow one of as well as unique sounds of its own. The guitar.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolder FREE V1
    FreeLibraries Volume 1 Owner’s Manual Music Workstation Overview Welcome to the first volume of free sound libraries from Bolder Sounds for the Korg KRONOS Music Workstation. This collection of 16 sample libraries has been chosen from 20 years of complimentary offerings in various formats from the Bolder Sounds website. Some of the free libraries are small tastes of larger retail libraries, these are noted with the word (demo) next to the title. Library titles are as follows - • Harmonica and Riffs • Toy Piano • 2 Music Boxes • Granular Kitchen • Bavarian Zither (demo) • Saxinet • Button Accordion • Melody Maker • Psaltery • 4 African Marimbas • Ebowed Guitar FX • Meditation Bowls (demo) • Tibetan Bowls (demo) • Granular Slate Rocks • Granular Gardening Throughout the bank the program material evolves from more traditional instruments to more experimental sounds featuring granular synthesis. Program List Program Name Program Name U-G000 Harmonica SW1=Samp.Vib U-G028 Afric. Marimba Oct/Layer U-G001 Harmonica VS Bend U-G029 Afric. Mar C4 split U-G002 Harmonica VS Riffs U-G030 Afric. Mar C3 split U-G003 Harmonica JS+Y=Bends U-G031 Afric. Mar C5 split U-G004 Harmonica JS+Y=Riffs U-G032 Bowed E. Guitar 1 U-G005 Toy Piano U-G033 Bowed E. Guitar 2 U-G006 Late Toy Piano U-G034 Bowed E. Guitar 3 U-G007 Tuned Toy Piano U-G035 Bowed E. Guitar 4 U-G008 Music Box U-G036 Bowed E. Guitar 5 U-G009 DIY Music Box U-G037 Bowed E. Guitar Split 1 U-G010 Music Box Layer U-G038 Bowed E. Guitar Split 2 U-G011 Music Box OCT U-G039 Bowed E.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Feedback Control to Musical Instrument Design
    APPLICATIONS OF FEEDBACK CONTROL TO MUSICAL INSTRUMENT DESIGN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Edgar Joseph Berdahl December 2009 © 2010 by Edgar Joseph Berdahl. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/pb603fs3989 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Julius Smith, III, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Gunter Niemeyer I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. J Salisbury, Jr Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii iv Preface In 1963, Max Mathews wrote that the \numbers which a modern digital computer generates can be directly converted to sound waves.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Peg Solitaire As a Compositional Tool
    Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression An Exploration of Peg Solitaire as a Compositional Tool Kirsty Keatch Department of Music University of Edinburgh Alison House 12 Nicolson Square Edinburgh EH8 9DF [email protected] ABSTRACT pieces such as Lacrosse (1976) and Cobra (1984). The Sounds of Solitaire is a novel interface for musical expression application of the game format, in Sounds of Solitaire, is useful based on an extended peg solitaire board as a generator of live in structuring musical experiences where a playful approach is musical composition. The classic puzzle game, for one person, taken to composition, by way of interaction with the is extended by mapping the moves of the game through a self musical material provided. contained system using Arduino and Raspberry Pi, triggering both analogue and digital sound. The solitaire board, as 2.1 Peg Solitaire instrument, is presented as a wood and Perspex box with the Peg Solitaire has been a popular game for a single player for hardware inside. Ball bearings function as both solitaire pegs centuries (see Figure 1). The object of the game is to begin with and switches, while a purpose built solenoid controlled a peg in each of the 33 holes, except the centre, and then, by monochord and ball bearing run provide the analogue sound making a series of leapfrog style moves, the peg that is jumped source, which is digitally manipulated in real-time, according to over is removed until the situation is reduced to a single peg in the sequences of game moves.
    [Show full text]