Geology Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology Paper REVEAL: REmote Views and Exploration of Antarctic Lithosphere Workshop: The future of Antarctic airborne geophysical capabilities—Workshop Report Compiled by Carol A. Finn Edited by Carol Finn, Sridhar Anandakrishnan, John Goodge, Kurt Panter, Christine Siddoway, and Terry Wilson This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Open-File Report 03-065 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey REVEAL: REmote Views and Exploration of Antarctic Lithosphere Workshop: The future of Antarctic airborne geophysical capabilities WORKSHOP REPORT August 5-8, 2002 Denver, CO Compiled by Carol A. Finn Edited by Sridhar Anandakrishnan, John Goodge, Kurt Panter, Christine Siddoway, and Terry Wilson "Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation." 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Antarctica is a key element in Earth’s geodynamic and climatic systems, yet on the eve of the 50th anniversary of the International Geophysical Year, we lack fundamental geologic and geophysical data from the deep interior of this vast continent. Meager exposures record the 3500 million-year history of a continent that participated in the formation and breakup of both the Rodinia and Gondwana supercontinents. It continues to be tectonically active today, although its kinematic relation to the global plate circuit and its role as substrate to the world’s major ice sheets remain in question. The Mesozoic break-up of Gondwana resulted in a major re-arrangement of the continental masses, which isolated Antarctica from mid-latitude oceanic influences by establishing the powerful circum-Antarctic current. This event was largely responsible for development of the massive West and East Antarctic ice sheets that blanket 98% of the continent and fundamentally influence world climate today. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) contains enough grounded ice to raise global sea level 5 meters, were it to melt completely, and hosts ice streams that potentially could evacuate the ice over short geologic timescales. Recent measurements show the ice sheet is undergoing rapid and dramatic change in some regions and reveal an ice-sheet-wide history of large fluctuations in extent and volume. Although the East Antarctic ice sheet is apparently more stable, it exerts a profound influence on global climate and covers numerous sub- glacial lakes that may have existed for millions of years. Major interest lies in the age of these lakes, their tectonic history, their resident biota, and the record of Antarctic climatic history that may be contained in the sediments beneath them. Global geodynamics was and continues to be a major influence on the formation, nature, and dynamics of the ice sheets. In turn, understanding geodynamics requires deciphering Antarctic geologic and tectonic history. For example, the mass balance and response of the WAIS to climate 3 forcing appear to be strongly influenced by geologic and geophysical parameters such as the distribution of sedimentary basins and the geothermal heat flux into the base of the ice. Precambrian structures may have influenced the style and location of younger tectonic and magmatic events that are manifested by the major features of the continent today, such as the Paleozoic and Mesozoic orogens of the Transantarctic Mountains, Mesozoic rift zones, and Cenozoic volcanic provinces. In turn, these events have influenced ice sheet dynamics and, therefore, global climate. Despite the central role that Antarctica has played in shaping the present global environment, fundamental, first-order parameters such as bedrock elevation, lithology, structure, age, tectonic history and ice volume remain poorly known over large portions of the continent. Given the extensive ice cover, airborne geophysical data, constrained by field-based geologic mapping, ground-based geophysics, and petrologic, geochemical and geochronological analysis of outcrop and drill-hole samples, is the best way to characterize broad areas of the Antarctic lithosphere. However, the U.S. Antarctic program currently lacks an effective means to collect and integrate airborne geophysical data with other datasets under broad science objectives defined by the earth science community. Regional high-resolution aerogeophysical coverage is also required by other national Antarctic research programs. In order to address scientific and logistical issues, the National Science Foundation sponsored an international workshop attended by 45 geologists, geophysicists and glaciologists in Denver, CO in August, 2002. The REVEAL workshop framed a set of key issues in Antarctic research that require airborne gravity, magnetic, laser altimetry and ice-penetrating radar measurements from long- and mid-range fixed-wing and helicopter platforms. Science goals and potential target areas were developed in the context of three major themes: (1). geology and ice sheet dynamics; (2). crustal architecture of the East Antarctic shield, and (3). geodynamics of rifting in an ice-covered environment. Investigations directed at these themes will form the basis for an integrated, 4 multidisciplinary initiative to study the relationship between Antarctic geodynamic processes, ice sheet dynamics and global environmental change. Specific goals of these research themes are outlined here. 1. Geology and ice sheet dynamics. Antarctic geological processes are the driving forces for ice sheet dynamics and global environmental change that affect current and long-term large-magnitude sea level changes. Key scientific issues are: • What are the geologic controls on ice sheet dynamics? o Extensional tectonics form rift basins and generate high heat flow that influence basal ice conditions. Measuring the 3-d geometry of rift basins and location of sub- ice volcanoes will help clarify the relation between tectonics and ice sheet dynamics. o Paleoclimate and ice sheet modeling studies are hampered by incomplete knowledge and/or poor resolution of boundary conditions which include reconstructions of global and regional paleogeography, paleotopography, heat flow, distribution of subglacial sediments, and Cenozoic volcanic rocks. • What are the masses of the ice sheets and fluxuations of sea levels on different time scales? o In order to understand the relation between ice mass balance and sea level, the current volume of the ice sheet needs to be determined. • What are the distribution, nature and origin of the sub-glacial lakes and their relation to crustal structure and heat flow? o The presence of subglacial lakes may have important implications for ice sheet dynamics as well as for terrestrial and marine glacial environments. Study of the lakes provides a means to understand the interaction between geologic and biologic processes. In addition, the extreme environments of these lakes may be analogous to those of early Earth and planets, revealing the conditions under which life began. 2. Crustal architecture of the East Antarctic shield. Unraveling the role of Antarctica in global geodynamic processes requires a basic understanding of the poorly-known East Antarctic shield and West Antarctic basement. Key questions to be addressed about the origin and evolution of Antarctic lithosphere are: • What was the role of East Antarctica in Precambrian continental growth processes? o Because East Antarctica occupied the center of early supercontinents such as Rodinia and Gondwana, and may represent ~15% of Earth’s Precambrian crust, it holds a key to understanding the processes governing continental growth spurts in the late Archean to Latest Neoproterozoic and issues such as the role of magmatism, accretionary and collisional tectonics, continental break-up, and subduction in early continental Earth history. 5 • What are the origins, extents and ages of interior basins? o Tectonic, erosion, subsidence and glacial history can be determined by knowing the age, lithology and 3-d geometry of sedimentary basins in East Antarctica. • What are the distribution, magnitudes, and focal mechanisms for earthquakes? o A lack of seismic data limits definition of lithospheric structure and neotectonics. • What is the timing and magnitude of Mesozoic to Cenozoic extension in Antarctica and its effect on the global plate motion circuit? o Extension in the latest Mesozoic rifted Australia and New Zealand from Antarctica. Study of the timing of extension, uplift and magmatism provides a means to determine mechanisms of continental breakup and relative motion between East and West Antarctica. o Rates of extension and lithospheric thinning have a direct influence on magma production rates and volcanism; however, the higher production rates in the late Cenozoic do not appear to be the result of higher rates of extension. 3. Geodynamics of rifting in an ice-covered environment. Understanding lithosphere geodynamics in Antarctica’s ice-covered environment will clarify its feedback on other global systems. • What are the feedbacks between mountain uplift and ice sheet and climate models? o Preliminary ice sheet modeling studies suggest the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains are the likely location for initiation of the East Antarctic ice sheet and therefore, could be a key factor in
Recommended publications
  • Air and Shipborne Magnetic Surveys of the Antarctic Into the 21St Century
    TECTO-125389; No of Pages 10 Tectonophysics xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Air and shipborne magnetic surveys of the Antarctic into the 21st century A. Golynsky a,⁎,R.Bellb,1, D. Blankenship c,2,D.Damasked,3,F.Ferracciolie,4,C.Finnf,5,D.Golynskya,6, S. Ivanov g,7,W.Jokath,8,V.Masolovg,6,S.Riedelh,7,R.vonFresei,9,D.Youngc,2 and ADMAP Working Group a VNIIOkeangeologia, 1, Angliysky Avenue, St.-Petersburg, 190121, Russia b LDEO of Columbia University, 61, Route 9W, PO Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA c University of Texas, Institute for Geophysics, 4412 Spicewood Springs Rd., Bldg. 600, Austin, Texas 78759-4445, USA d BGR, Stilleweg 2 D-30655, Hannover, Germany e BAS, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK f USGS, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046 Denver, CO 80255, USA g PMGE, 24, Pobeda St., Lomonosov, 189510, Russia h AWI, Columbusstrasse, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany i School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, 125 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA article info abstract Article history: The Antarctic geomagnetics' community remains very active in crustal anomaly mapping. More than 1.5 million Received 1 August 2011 line-km of new air- and shipborne data have been acquired over the past decade by the international community Received in revised form 27 January 2012 in Antarctica. These new data together with surveys that previously were not in the public domain significantly Accepted 13 February 2012 upgrade the ADMAP compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Preprint Arxiv:1806.10939, 2018
    Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-4 Manuscript under review for journal Solid Earth Discussion started: 15 January 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models Hugo K. H. Olierook1, Richard Scalzo2, David Kohn3, Rohitash Chandra2,4, Ehsan Farahbakhsh2,4, Gregory Houseman3, Chris Clark1, Steven M. Reddy1, R. Dietmar Müller4 5 1School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia 2Centre for Translational Data Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia 3Sydney Informatics Hub, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia 4EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia Correspondence to: Hugo K. H. Olierook ([email protected]) 10 Abstract. Traditional approaches to develop 3D geological models employ a mix of quantitative and qualitative scientific techniques, which do not fully provide quantification of uncertainty in the constructed models and fail to optimally weight geological field observations against constraints from geophysical data. Here, we demonstrate a Bayesian methodology to fuse geological field observations with aeromagnetic and gravity data to build robust 3D models in a 13.5 × 13.5 km region of the Gascoyne Province, Western Australia. Our approach is validated by comparing model results to independently-constrained 15 geological maps and cross-sections produced by the Geological Survey of Western Australia. By fusing geological field data with magnetics and gravity surveys, we show that at 89% of the modelled region has >95% certainty. The boundaries between geological units are characterized by narrow regions with <95% certainty, which are typically 400–1000 m wide at the Earth’s surface and 500–2000 m wide at depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Actas Del Vi Simposio De La Red Latinoamericana De Estudios Sobre Imagen, Identidad Y Territorio
    ACTAS DEL VI SIMPOSIO DE LA RED LATINOAMERICANA DE ESTUDIOS SOBRE IMAGEN, IDENTIDAD Y TERRITORIO “ESCENARIOS DE INQUIETUD. CIUDADES, POÉTICAS, POLÍTICAS” 14, 15 Y 16 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2016 MICAELA CUESTA M. FERNANDA GONZÁLEZ MARÍA STEGMAYER (COMPS.) 2 Cuesta, Micaela Actas del VI Simposio de la Red Latinoamericana de estudios sobre Imagen, Identidad y Territorio : escenarios de inquietud : ciudades, poéticas, políticas / Micaela Cuesta ; María Fernanda González ; María Stegmayer. - 1a ed compendiada. - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Departamento de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani - UBA, 2016. Libro digital, PDF Archivo Digital: descarga y online ISBN 978-987-3810-27-5 1. Identidad. 2. Imagen. 3. Actas de Congresos. I. González, María Fernanda II. Stegmayer, María III. Título CDD 306 3 ÍNDICE Presentación .............................................................................................................................. 5 Ciudades y memorias Sesión de debates I: Cuerpo y espacio Ciudades performativas: Teatralidad, memoria y experiencia..................................................... 11 Lorena Verzero Fioravante e o vazio: o desenho como estratégia de ausência................................................... 21 Eduardo Vieira da Cunha Percepción geográfica del espacio y los cuatro elementos: Reflexión sobre una interfaz entre fenomenología y astrología.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Neotectonics of the San Andreas Fault System, Santa Cruz Mountains, in Light of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake
    Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Field Guide to Neotectonics of the San Andreas Fault System, Santa Cruz Mountains, in Light of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake | Q|s | Landslides (Quaternary) I yv I Vaqueros Sandstone (Oligocene) r-= I San Lorenzo Fm., Rices Mudstone I TSr I member (Eocene-Oligocene) IT- I Butano Sandstone, ' Pnil mudstone member (Eocene) Coseismic surface fractures, ..... dashed where discontinuous, dotted where projected or obscured ___ _ _ Contact, dashed where approximately located >"«»"'"" « « Fault, dotted where concealed V. 43? Strike and dip Strike and dip of of bedding overturned bedding i Vector Scale / (Horizontal Component of Displacement) OPEN-FILE REPORT 90-274 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. Men to Park, California April 27, 1990 Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Field Guide to Neotectonics of the San Andreas Fault System, Santa Cruz Mountains, in Light of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake David P. Schwartz and Daniel J. Ponti, editors U. S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA 94025 with contributions by: Robert S. Anderson U.C. Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA William R. Cotton William Cotton and Associates, Los Gatos, CA Kevin J. Coppersmith Geomatrix Consultants, San Francisco, CA Steven D. Ellen U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Edwin L. Harp U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Ralph A.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogenous Thinning and Subglacial Lake Activity on Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica Andrew O
    https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-80 Preprint. Discussion started: 9 April 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Brief Communication: Heterogenous thinning and subglacial lake activity on Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica Andrew O. Hoffman1, Knut Christianson1, Daniel Shapero2, Benjamin E. Smith2, Ian Joughin2 1Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 98115, United States of America 5 2Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, 98115, United States of America Correspondence to: Andrew O. Hoffman ([email protected]) Abstract. A system of subglacial laKes drained on Thwaites Glacier from 2012-2014. To improve coverage for subsequent drainage events, we extended the elevation and ice velocity time series on Thwaites Glacier through austral winter 2019. These new observations document a second drainage cycle and identified two new laKe systems located in the western tributaries of 10 Thwaites and Haynes Glaciers. In situ and satellite velocity observations show temporary < 3% speed fluctuations associated with laKe drainages. In agreement with previous studies, these observations suggest that active subglacial hydrology has little influence on Thwaites Glacier thinning and retreat on decadal to centennial timescales. 1 Introduction Although subglacial laKes beneath the Antarctic Ice Sheet were first discovered more than 50 years ago (Robin et al., 1969; 15 Oswald and Robin, 1973), they remain one of the most enigmatic components of the subglacial hydrology system. Initially identified in ice-penetrating radar data as flat, bright specular reflectors (Oswald and Robin, 1973; Carter et al., 2007) subglacial laKes were thought to be relatively steady-state features of the basal hydrology system with little impact on the dynamics of the overlying ice on multi-year timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2007 Science Planning Summaries
    Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the available indexes. Project Web Sites Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by viewing project web sites. More Information Additional information pertaining to the 2006-2007 Field Season. Home Page Station Schedules Air Operations Staffed Field Camps Event Numbering System 2006-2007 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the USAP Program Indexes available indexes. Aeronomy and Astrophysics Dr. Bernard Lettau, Program Director (acting) Project Web Sites Biology and Medicine Dr. Roberta Marinelli, Program Director Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by Geology and Geophysics viewing project web sites. Dr. Thomas Wagner, Program Director Glaciology Dr. Julie Palais, Program Director More Information Ocean and Climate Systems Additional information pertaining Dr. Bernhard Lettau, Program Director to the 2006-2007 Field Season. Artists and Writers Home Page Ms. Kim Silverman, Program Director Station Schedules USAP Station and Vessel Indexes Air Operations Staffed Field Camps Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station Event Numbering System McMurdo Station Palmer Station RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer ARSV Laurence M. Gould Special Projects Principal Investigator Index Deploying Team Members Index Institution Index Event Number Index Technical Event Index Project Web Sites 2006-2007 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the Project Web Sites available indexes. Principal Investigator/Link Event No. Project Title Aghion, Anne W-218-M Works and days: An antarctic Project Web Sites chronicle Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by Ainley, David B-031-M Adélie penguin response to viewing project web sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup Geological Society Special Publications Society Book Editors R
    Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup Geological Society Special Publications Society Book Editors R. J. PANKHURST (CHIEF EDITOR) P. DOYLE E J. GREGORY J. S. GRIFFITHS A. J. HARTLEY R. E. HOLDSWORTH A. C. MORTON N. S. ROBINS M. S. STOKER J. P. TURNER Special Publication reviewing procedures The Society makes every effort to ensure that the scientific and production quality of its books matches that of its journals. Since 1997, all book proposals have been refereed by specialist reviewers as well as by the Society's Books Editorial Committee. If the referees identify weaknesses in the proposal, these must be addressed before the proposal is accepted. Once the book is accepted, the Society has a team of Book Editors (listed above) who ensure that the volume editors follow strict guidelines on refereeing and quality control. We insist that individual papers can only be accepted after satis- factory review by two independent referees. The questions on the review forms are similar to those for Journal of the Geological Society. The referees' forms and comments must be available to the Society's Book Editors on request. Although many of the books result from meetings, the editors are expected to commission papers that were not pre- sented at the meeting to ensure that the book provides a balanced coverage of the subject. Being accepted for presentation at the meeting does not guarantee inclusion in the book. Geological Society Special Publications are included in the ISI Science Citation Index, but they do not have an impact factor, the latter being applicable only to journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    Ross and Siegert: Lake Ellsworth englacial layers and basal melting 1 1 THIS IS AN EARTHARXIV PREPRINT OF AN ARTICLE SUBMITTED FOR 2 PUBLICATION TO THE ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY 3 Basal melt over Subglacial Lake Ellsworth and it catchment: insights from englacial layering 1 2 4 Ross, N. , Siegert, M. , 1 5 School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6 UK 2 7 Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK Annals of Glaciology 61(81) 2019 2 8 Basal melting over Subglacial Lake Ellsworth and its 9 catchment: insights from englacial layering 1 2 10 Neil ROSS, Martin SIEGERT, 1 11 School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 2 12 Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK 13 Correspondence: Neil Ross <[email protected]> 14 ABSTRACT. Deep-water ‘stable’ subglacial lakes likely contain microbial life 15 adapted in isolation to extreme environmental conditions. How water is sup- 16 plied into a subglacial lake, and how water outflows, is important for under- 17 standing these conditions. Isochronal radio-echo layers have been used to infer 18 where melting occurs above Lake Vostok and Lake Concordia in East Antarc- 19 tica but have not been used more widely. We examine englacial layers above 20 and around Lake Ellsworth, West Antarctica, to establish where the ice sheet 21 is ‘drawn down’ towards the bed and, thus, experiences melting. Layer draw- 22 down is focused over and around the NW parts of the lake as ice, flowing 23 obliquely to the lake axis, becomes afloat.
    [Show full text]
  • SOP14 Geophysical Survey
    SSFL Use Only SSFL SOP 14 Geophysical Survey Revision: 0 Date: April 2012 Prepared: C. Werden Technical Review: J. Plevniak Approved and QA Review: J. Oxford Issued: 4/6/2012 Signature/Date 1.0 Objective The purpose of this technical standard operating procedure (SOP) is to introduce the procedures for non-invasive geophysical investigations in areas suspected of being used for disposal of debris or where landfill operations may have been conducted. Specifics of the geophysical surveys will be discussed in the Geophysical Survey Field Sampling Plan Addendum. Geophysical methods that will be used to accurately locate and record buried geophysical anomalies are: . Total Field Magnetometry (TFM) . Frequency Domain Electromagnetic Method (FDEM) . Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) TFM and FDEM will be applied to all areas of interest while GPR will be applied only to areas of interest that require further and/or higher resolution of geophysical anomaly. The geophysical investigation (survey) will be conducted by geophysical subcontractor personnel trained, experienced, and qualified in shallow subsurface geophysics necessary to successfully perform any of the above geophysical methods. CDM Smith will provide oversight of the geophysical contractor. 2.0 Background 2.1 Discussion This SOP is based on geophysical methods employed by US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) subcontractor Hydrogeologic Inc. (HGL) while conducted geophysical surveys of portions of Area IV during 2010 and 2011. The Data Gap Investigation conducted as part of Phase 3 identified additional locations of suspected buried materials not surveyed by HGL. To be consistent with the recently collected subsurface information, HGL procedures are being adopted. The areas of interest and survey limits will be determined prior to field mobilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italic refer to tables, and those in bold to figures. accretionary orogens, defined 23 Namaqua-Natal Orogen 435-8 Africa, East SW Angola and NW Botswana 442 Congo-Sat Francisco Craton 4, 5, 35, 45-6, 49, 64 Umkondo Igneous Province 438-9 palaeomagnetic poles at 1100-700 Ma 37 Pan-African orogenic belts (650-450 Ma) 442-50 East African(-Antarctic) Orogen Damara-Lufilian Arc-Zambezi Belt 3, 435, accretion and deformation, Arabian-Nubian Shield 442-50 (ANS) 327-61 Katangan basaltic rocks 443,446 continuation of East Antarctic Orogen 263 Mwembeshi Shear Zone 442 E/W Gondwana suture 263-5 Neoproterozoic basin evolution and seafloor evolution 357-8 spreading 445-6 extensional collapse in DML 271-87 orogenesis 446-51 deformations 283-5 Ubendian and Kibaran Belts 445 Heimefront Shear Zone, DML 208,251, 252-3, within-plate magmatism and basin initiation 443-5 284, 415,417 Zambezi Belt 27,415 structural section, Neoproterozoic deformation, Zambezi Orogen 3, 5 Madagascar 365-72 Zambezi-Damara Belt 65, 67, 442-50 see also Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS); Zimbabwe Belt, ophiolites 27 Mozambique Belt Zimbabwe Craton 427,433 Mozambique Belt evolution 60-1,291, 401-25 Zimbabwe-Kapvaal-Grunehogna Craton 42, 208, 250, carbonates 405.6 272-3 Dronning Mand Land 62-3 see also Pan-African eclogites and ophiolites 406-7 Africa, West 40-1 isotopic data Amazonia-Rio de la Plata megacraton 2-3, 40-1 crystallization and metamorphic ages 407-11 Birimian Orogen 24 Sm-Nd (T DM) 411-14 A1-Jifn Basin see Najd Fault System lithologies 402-7 Albany-Fraser-Wilkes
    [Show full text]