DOCSLIB.ORG

Rattus Exulans) from Fanal Island, New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rattus Exulans) from Fanal Island, New Zealand Eradication of Pacific rats (Rattus exulans) from Fanal Island, New Zealand. C. R. Veitch Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68-908, Newton, Auckland, New Zealand. Present address: 48 Manse Road. Papakura, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Fanal Island (73 ha) is the largest island in the Mokohinau Group, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Pacific rats, or kiore, (Rattus exulans) reached these islands between about 1100 and 1800 A.D. Pacific rats were removed from all islands in this group, except Fanal Island, in 1990. An aerial application of Talon 7-20 (containing brodifacoum at 20 ppm) at a nominal rate of 10 kg/ha was made on Fanal Island on 4 August 1997 with the intention of eradicating the rats. Despite heavy rainfall immediately after the poisoning operation, and the fact that baits were not of optimum palatability, the rats were eradicated. Keywords Bitrex; brodifacoum; aerial baiting. INTRODUCTION cations they were presumed to be detrimental to natural Fanal Island (Motukino), 73 ha, is the largest and most processes (Holdaway 1989; Atkinson and Moller 1990). southerly island in the Mokohinau Group which is at the Pacific rats were removed from all islands in this group, northern extremity of the Hauraki Gulf, about mid way except Fanal Island, by the Department of Conservation between Great Barrier Island and the mainland (Fig. 1). in 1990 (McFadden and Greene 1994). Fanal Island is part of Mokohinau Islands Nature Reserve, Under the Regulations Act 1936 and the Grey-faced Pet- which is administered by the Department of Conservation rel (Northern Muttonbird) Notice 1979, Ngati Wai of Aotea under the Reserves Act 1977. It is also a wildlife sanctu- (Great Barrier) have muttonbirding privileges on all is- ary under the Wildlife Act 1953. lands of the Mokohinau Group. They approved the re- Pacific rats, or kiore, (Rattus exulans) are presumed to moval of Pacific rats from the northern Mokohinau Group, have reached these islands with Maori between about 1100 and they initiated the proposal to remove Pacific rats from and 1800 A.D. These islands were also modified by burn- Fanal Island in May 1995. ing of the forest to aid Maori food gathering and Burgess Fanal Island is surrounded by steep cliffs and has a gently Island, the next largest in the group, was cleared for pasto- sloping forested summit plateau, which rises to 134 m near ral farming associated with the establishment of a light- the northern cliffs. There are small seasonal streams in house (c. 1890) and wartime defence operations. The the three main valleys which drain to the south-west. The impacts of Pacific rats on these ecosystems are not known, vegetation is coastal forest and scrub, much of which is but from circumstantial evidence and studies at other lo- regenerating following fires in earlier times (Esler 1978; Wright 1980a, 1980b; de Lange et al. 1994). Most of the expected array of forest birds was present on Fanal but saddlebacks (Philesturnus carunculatus) were absent, presumably as a result of previous forest destruc- tion. Attempts to re-introduce saddlebacks in 1968 and 1985 failed to establish a breeding population although individuals did survive up to 15 years after liberation. During preparations for this operation no populations of fauna were identified which might be detrimentally affected by the proposed aerial bait distribution to eradicate the rats. METHODS Bait spread On 4 August 1997 an aerial application of Talon 7-20 was applied to Fanal Island at a nominal rate of 10 kg/ha. Talon Fig. 1 Fanal Island is part of the Mokohinau 7-20 is a pollard bait containing brodifacoum at 20 ppm Group situated at the northern extremity of the and the bittering agent bitrex (denatonium benzoate). Hauraki Gulf. Pages 357-359 In Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N. (eds.). Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species The operation was run from Tawharanui Regional Park RESULTS (Fig. 1), with permission of the Auckland Regional Coun- cil Parks managers. A Differential Global Positioning No rats or rat sign was detected during the three visits in System (DGPS) base station was established on the hill- 1998, 1999, and 2000 (I. McFadden pers. comm.; P. Todd top east of Park Headquarters at Tawharanui Regional Park. pers. comm.; G. Wilson pers. comm.). It is believed that Marine Helicopters Ltd Llama helicopter took one under- Pacific rats have been eradicated from Fanal Island de- slung bait spreader bucket loaded with 825 kg of Talon spite significant rainfall over the second and third nights 7-20 bait to Fanal Island. A strong south-east wind was after the bait was spread and the presence of bitrex in the blowing. The island boundaries were logged into the bait. DGPS and the bait was then spread. DISCUSSION The DGPS was set to show navigation lines for the heli- copter at 60 metre intervals. The bucket being used was In this situation, where ground checking and a second flight spreading bait over a 120 m swath at a rate of 4 kg/ha. to spread more bait was not possible, the increased flying Thus we expected 8 kg/ha to be spread in most areas, 4 time to give closer flight lines proved an acceptable alter- kg/ha where there had been only one pass, and an average native. The overlapping flight lines ensured that there was of 10 kg/ha over the flight area. a complete bait coverage of the island with a rate of 4 kg/ha Monitoring being the lowest likely spread. Bitrex, a bittering substance added to reduce accidental Unpredicted heavy rain fell between 5pm on 5 August and human consumption of rat bait, has been shown to reduce 1am on 7 August (Fig. 2). The total fall recorded by the the consumption of bait by captive Pacific rats (Appen- automatic weather station on Burgess Island was 106 mm dix 1). We were not aware of the presence of bitrex in the with hourly rates averaging 3.4 mm per hour and reaching Talon 7-20 formulation until after the operation but it did a maximum of 9 mm per hour. There were no visits to the not affect the final outcome of the operation. island to monitor possible acceleration of bait decay due to this rain. The period of heavy rainfall was not predicted in weather forecasts or seen by weather observers until late on 4 Au- During a brief visit to the island in mid-1998 rat traps were gust (R. McDavitt pers. comm.). It is unfortunate that set for one night (I. McFadden pers. comm.). During a monitoring of bait decay was not possible and it is not visit in May 1999 snap traps were set for 400 trap nights known whether bait survived this rain or whether the rats and extensive searches were made for fresh rat sign (P. all consumed lethal doses within the first two nights. Todd pers. comm.). Further searches for rat sign were made, but no traps were set, during a visit in May 2000 The success of this operation, despite adverse weather (G. Wilson pers. comm.). conditions and unattractive bait, is evidence of the effec- tiveness of aerial application of brodifacoum baits for rat eradication from islands. Nevertheless, it is prudent that future operations be managed with such variables in their favour. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Bill Simmons and Animal Control Products for the bait supplied for trials and Ian McFadden for his tech- nical advice and reports on the follow-up monitoring. REFERENCES Atkinson, I. A. E. and Moller, H. 1990. Kiore. In King, C. M. (ed.). The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, pp 175-192. Auckland, Oxford University Press. de Lange, P. J.; McFadden, I. and Cameron, E. K. 1994. Preliminary report of the flora and fauna of Fanal Is- Fig. 2 Rainfall recorded at the automatic land, Mokohinau Islands Nature Reserve. Unpublished weather station on Burgess Island. This is for Report, Science and Research Division, Department of the 24 hours of each day, not to 0900 hours as Conservation. at manual weather stations. 358 Veitch: Eradication of rats from Fanal Island Esler, A. E. 1978. Botanical features of the Mokohinau Appendix 1 A comparison of baits with and Islands. Tane 24: 187-197. without bitrex. Holdaway, R. 1989. New Zealand’s pre-human avifauna In May 1996 baits with and without bitrex were tested on and its vulnerability. In Rudge, M. R. (ed.). Moas, mam- wild caught Pacific rats (Rattus exulans) on Little Barrier mals and climate in the ecological history of New Zea- Island as part of a larger test of bait flavours. land. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 12. McFadden, I and Greene, T. 1994. Using brodifacoum to Bitrex (denatonium benzoate) may be added to eradicate kiore (Rattus exulans) from Burgess Island brodifacoum at the point of manufacture. The brodifacoum and the Knights Group of the Mokohinau Islands. Wel- in the samples compared came from two different sources; lington, Department of Conservation, Science and Re- one contained bitrex and the other did not. The quantity search Series 70: 18pp. of bitrex in the toxin is not known. In all other respects the baits were the same, being Wanganui No. 7 formula- Wright, A. E. 1980a. Auckland University Field Club Sci- tion dyed green and pressed into 2 gram pellets. The entific Trip to the Mokohinau Islands, May 1979. In- brodifacoum was loaded at 20 ppm. The bait with bitrex troduction and Acknowledgements. Tane 26: 1-6. is now the registered formulation Talon 7-20 and the bait Wright, A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coastal Resources Limited Marine Dumping Consent Application
    Coastal Resources Limited marine dumping consent application Submission Reference no: 78 Izzy Fordham (alternatively Helgard Wagener), Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Submitter Type: Not specified Source: Email Overall Notes: Clause Do you intend to have a spokesperson who will act on your behalf (e.g. a lawyer or professional adviser)? Position Yes Notes The chair of the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Clause Please list your spokesperson's first name and last name, email address, phone number, and postal address. Notes Izzy Fordham, [email protected], 0212867555, Aotea Great Barrier Local Board, 81 Hector Sanderson Road, Claris, Great Barrier Island Clause Do you wish to speak to your submission at the hearing? Position Yes I/we wish to speak to my/our submission at the hearing Notes Clause If you wish to speak to your submission at the hearing, tick the boxes that apply to you: Position If others make a similar submission I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at the hearing. Notes Clause We will send you regular updates by email Position I can receive emails and my email address is correct. Notes Clause What decision do you want the EPA to make and why? Provide reasons in the box below. Position Refuse Notes Full submission is attached Coastal Resources Ltd Marine Dumping Consent: Submission by the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Proposal number: EEZ100015 Executive Summary 1. The submission is made by the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board on behalf of our community, who object to the application. Our island is the closest community to the proposed dump site and the most likely to be affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Aotea Conservation Park Proposal Public Discussion Paper and Invitation to Comment
    Aotea Conservation Park Proposal Public discussion paper and invitation to comment December 2013 Cover: Trampers taking in the view of Whangapoua beach and estuary from Windy Canyon Track, Aotea/Great Barrier Island. Photo: Andris Apse © Copyright 2013, New Zealand Department of Conservation In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. PROPOSED AOTEA CONSERVATION PARK ................................................................................ 5 2.1 Why is the Department proposing a conservation park? .................................................... 5 2.2 What is a conservation park? ................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 What are the benefits of creating a conservation park? ....................................................... 6 2.4 Proposed boundaries .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4.1 Map 1: Proposed Aotea Conservation Park ....................................................................... 7 2.4.2 Map 2: Proposed Aotea Conservation Park and other conservation land on Aotea/Great Barrier Island ...................................................................................... 8 2.4.3 Table 1: Land proposed for inclusion in
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Effects on Seabirds in Northern North Island POP2017-06
    Indirect effects on seabirds in northern North Island POP2017-06 Summarising new information on a range of seabird populations in northern New Zealand June 2019 Prepared by Chris Gaskin, Project Coordinator, Northern New Zealand Seabird Trust (NNZST), Peter Frost, Science Support Service and Megan Friesen (Saint Martin’s University, Lacey, WA, USA/NNZST). Funding support from the and the Birds NZ Research Fund Cover photo (top). Mahuki Island Australasian gannet colony, aerial survey 27 November 2018. Photo: Richard Robinson. Cover photo (bottom). Buller’s shearwater colony on Tawhiti Rahi, Poor Knights Islands. Photo: Chris Gaskin Figure 1 (this page top). Thermal imaging of fluttering shearwaters at the lighthouse, Taranga Hen Island. Screenshot from video: NNZST Figure 2 (this page bottom). Pinnacles and Hanging Rock from the lighthouse, Taranga Hen Island. Photo: Chris Gaskin 2 Introduction This project (POP2017-06) builds on the findings of INT2016-04 (Gaskin 2017). A range of commercial fisheries target aggregations of surface shoaling fish and purse seining is commonly used to capture these fish schools. The dense fish schools create a phenomenon known as fish workups. These fish drive up prey items to the sea surface and observations suggest that this forms an important food source for a range of seabird species. There is currently poor knowledge of both the diet of surface-foraging seabirds and what prey items are being made available to seabirds from fish workups. This has limited our understanding of the mechanisms through which changes in the distribution and/or abundance of fish workups may be driving seabird population changes (population status and annual breeding success).
    [Show full text]
  • Aotea Great Barrier Environmental Trust
    Membership Fees Annual Subscriptions: Ordinary: $25, Senior: $20, Family $35, Student $15 Issue 38 Spring/Summer 2017 Life Subscriptions: Life Seniors: $200, Life Ordinary: $250 www.gbiet.org Corporate Subscriptions: Negotiable (contact: [email protected]) NAME: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ADDRESS: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… EMAIL: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. PHONE: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... CONTACT PREFERENCE (circle): mail/email RESIDENT RATEPAYER RESIDENT AND RATEPAYER MEMBERSHIP TYPE (circle): Ordinary/Senior/Family/Student/Life (senior)/Life SEND TO: Great Barrier Island Environmental Trust, PO Box 35, Okiwi, Great Barrier Island, 0963 DIRECT CREDIT: 12-3110-0058231-00 REFERENCE: Name DID YOU KNOW? You can access back issues of the Environment News (and Bush Telegraph) online at: http://www.gbiet.org/news CONTACT US Email: [email protected] /Facebook and Twitter Readers are welcome to send in contributions to the Environmental News. Email: [email protected] Aotea - Island of Lizards Hauraki Gulf Seabird Research - Claris Fire Scar Little Windy Hill - Conservation Dogs The Needles, the northern-most point on Aotea Great Barrier. Photo: I. Mabey Beyond Barrier GBIET gratefully acknowledges the support of the Great Barrier Local Board. 24 The trees, plants and ground cover had been Pest free sculpted by the movement of a million Four days later, sitting on the back deck of the seabirds, but the most striking feature was that hut and taking the petrel boards off for the last the very island itself – the ground beneath our time, I give a sigh of relief and my partner a feet - was nothing but an enormous labyrinth quick rub for a job well done. No rats. In all of catacombs, excavated by the subterranean honesty, there never usually is on these jobs, movements of a million burrowing seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Predation by Kiore Upon Lizards from The
    JOHN McCALLUM 83 82 Exmouth Road, Northcote, Auckland, 9, New Zealand EVIDENCE OF PREDATION BY KIORE UPON LIZARDS FROM THE MOKOHINAU ISLANDS Summary: The kiore or Polynesian rat (Rattus exulans) has been suggested as the probable cause for reduced reptile, seabird and invertebrate faunas on many of the northern offshore islands of New Zealand, but the evidence is largely circumstantial and it is based on comparisons between islands with and without kiore. In 1977, kiore colonised a small island in the Mokohinau Group (Hauraki Gulf), where they caused a dramatic drop in lizard numbers. Their impact upon seabirds appeared minimal. Kiore were subsequently removed by poisoning; the altered lizard fauna remaining suggests that some species were more susceptible to rat predation than others. Keywords: Rattus exulans; Mokohinau Islands; rat invasion; reptile predation; seabird nesting; rat removal; altered fauna. Introduction Evidence for kiore damage to reptile and bird The kiore or Polynesian rat, Rattus exulans (Peale), is populations is largely circumstantial, and alternative widespread throughout the Pacific region, inhabiting explanations for impoverished faunas have been most of the island groups within 30° latitude of the presented. For example, Craig (in press) suggests equator, and present as far south as latitude 47° in depauperate faunas are at least partly the result of Fiordland and Stewart Island, New Zealand (Williams, habitat modification associated with human activity, 1973). Its presence on widely separated island groups and questions the assumption that lizard distribution has been attributed to transportation, deliberate or on offshore islands was uniform prior to the arrival of accidental, during Polynesian colonisation of the kiore.
    [Show full text]
  • Awana Area 9 - Awana
    PART 5 - STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AREAS StrategicStrategic Management Management Area 9 - Awana Area 9 - Awana CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 32 HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1996 reprinted 1/12/00 PART 5 - STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AREAS STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AREA 9 : AWANA • Protection of significant wildlife habitats and 5.9.0 DESCRIPTION ecosystems, particularly those sensitive to disturbance. • Management and control over the location of buildings The Awana SMA is characterised by an enclosed valley and structures in recognition of the propensity of low system opening out to a series of alluvial flats and wetland lying areas to flooding. systems and a sensitive coastal margin comprised of sand • Recognition of high water tables and the limited dunes. A number of smaller bays and headlands along the capability of areas of land for effluent disposal, together rugged coast to the north are also included within the with the consequent implications for development. catchment. Much of the area is in forest or regenerating shrublands with cleared areas in pasture confined to the • Protection of sensitive dune areas and management of foothills and alluvial flats in the lower catchment. A large recreational access and other activities likely to affect portion of the flat land has a high water table and is prone to sand dune stability. flooding. The dunes backing Awana Bay are exposed and • Retention of vegetation and restrictions on land use subject to erosion, while parts of the surrounding hills have activities in upper catchment areas. areas with significant erosion scars. • Management of the sensitive coastal environment. A number of smaller lots exist at the southern end of Awana Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY FIELD CLUB SCIENTIFIC TRIP to the MOKOHINAU ISLANDS, MAY 1979 Introduction and Acknowledgements
    TANE 26, 1980 AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY FIELD CLUB SCIENTIFIC TRIP TO THE MOKOHINAU ISLANDS, MAY 1979 Introduction and Acknowledgements by A.E. Wright A.U.F.C. Vice-President 1975 - 1980 The Mokohinau Islands were chosen as the venue for Field Club's 1979 offshore island scientific trip primarily to allow a detailed study of one particular island, Fanal Island, which had received very little attention previously. A party of eleven left Auckland in the launch Westpoint early in the evening of 19 May, 1979 and arrived at the Mokohinau Islands approximately 3am next morning. At daybreak, seven people (Peter Bellingham, Elizabeth Brown, Greg Browne, David Greig, Peter Matthews, Wynne Spring-Rice and Anthony Wright) were put ashore on Fanal Island. The remainder of the party (Roger Harker, Gary Housley, John McCallum and David Riddell) were landed on Burgess Island soon after. On Fanal Island studies were carried out in the fields of archaeology, botany (bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants), entomology, geology, geomorphology and ornithology and the results in most of these fields follow. On and around Burgess Island and the adjacent Knights Group, studies were completed in the fields of benthic ecology, herpetology and ornithology. Both parties left the islands and returned to Auckland on 26 May, 1979. The Mokohinau Islands (latitude 35° 50'S, longitude 175° 10'E), the most isolated of the Hauraki Gulf Island Groups, lie 100 km north- north-east of Auckland City. The Group consists of Burgess Island, the adjacent Knights Group of smaller islands and rock stacks, and Fanal Island, lying some 5km to the south-east (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Aotea Conservation Park Advisory Committee
    Aotea Conservation Park Advisory Committee Meeting 10 10am, 10 December 2018 Room 4.8N, 4th Floor, Bledisloe House, 24 Wellesley Street, Auckland AGENDA AND MEETING PAPERS MEMBERS: Mr Paul Downie Chairperson Ms Nicola MacDonald Member Ms Judy Gilbert Member Mr Rodney Ngawaka Member Mr Tony Christiansen Member Ms Catherine Munro Member Ms Kate Waterhouse Member Ms Liane Ngamane Member Vacant Member Vacant Member 1 ACPAC Agenda 10 December 2018 - DOC-5594179 ACPAC Agenda 10 December 2018 DOC-5594179 Needles Point Aotea Conservation Park Aiguilles Island ´ Miners Head Te Paparahi Ahuriri Point Motairehe Rd Mabeys Rd Waikaro Point Katherine Bay Motairehe Maunganui Point Kawa Rd Whangapoua Kawa Beach Rakitu Island Mabeys RdWhangapoua Estuary (Arid Island) Karaka Bay Rd Port Abercrombie Aotea Rd Okiwi Port Fitzroy Aotea Rd Motuhaku Kaikoura Island Harataonga (Selwyn Island) Beach Whakatautuna Point Harataonga Rd Port Fitzroy Kiwiriki Bay Great Barrier Stony Beach Forest Awana Bay Motutaiko Rangiahua Is. Gray Rd Broken Islands Palmers Beach Whangaparapara Mahuki Is. Road Whangaparapara Walter Blackwell Rd Kaitoke Beach Claris Blind Bay Rd Okupu Medlands Beach Hauraki WhangaparaparaHarbour Blind Gulf Bay Medlands Rd Tryphena Harbour Rd Tryphena Shoal Bay Rd Shag Point Rosalie Bay Rd Tryphena Legend Mulberry Schooner Bay Harbour Grove Aotea Conservation Park Road Cape Barrier Rd 0 1 2 4 Kilometres 1 Cape Barrier 2 Part Two—Places 14 Great Barrier Island (Aotea Island) Place Note: In 2013, the Minister of Conservation requested the Department to investigate the reclassification of conservation (stewardship) areas on Great Barrier Island (Aotea Island). The decision to reclassify all 16 stewardship areas (as well as incorporating the Hirakimatā – Kaitoke Swamp Ecological Area and Wairahi Forest Sanctuary Area) to create a 12,109 ha conservation park, and to establish an advisory committee for the park was announced on 20 July 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report of the Flora and Fauna of Fanal Island, Mokohinau Islands Nature Reserve
    SCIENCE & RESEARCH SERIES NO.94 PRELIMINARY REPORT OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA OF FANAL ISLAND, MOKOHINAU ISLANDS NATURE RESERVE by Peter J. de Lange, Ian McFadden, and Ewen, K. Cameron Published by Head Office, Department of Conservation, P 0 Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN 0113-3713 ISBN 0-478-01751-0 September 1995, Department of Conservation Cataloguing-in-Publication data De Lange, Peter James. Preliminary report of the flora and fauna of Fanal Island, Mokohinau Islands Nature Reserve / by Peter J. de Lange, Ian McFadden, and Ewen K. Cameron. Wellington, N.Z. : Dept. of Conservation, 1995. 1 v. ; 30 cm. (Science & Research series, 0113-3713 ; no. 94.) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0478017510 1. Ecological surveys--New Zealand--Mokohinau Islands. 2. Islands ecology--New Zealand--Mokohinau Islands. 3. Island fauna--New Zealand--Mokohinau Islands. 4. Island plants--New Zealand--Mokohinau Islands. 5. Mokohinau Islands (N.Z.) I. McFadden, Ian. II. Cameron, Ewen K. III. Series: Science & research series ; no. 94. 574.99324 20 zbn95-082732 Keywords: Motukino Island, threatened species, problem weeds, flora values, fauna values CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. 1 1. INTRODUCTION . .. ..... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. 1 2. RESULTS . .. ... .. ..... .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. ... .. .. 4 2.1 Plant collections and additions to the island flora 4 2.2 Problem weeds 4 2.3 Cryptogamic flora 4 2.4 Vegetation quadrats 5 2.5 Threatened species - Flora 5 2.5.1 Poor Knights spleenwort (Asplenium
    [Show full text]
  • Great Barrier Island Marine Reserve Application to Be Notified
    Aotea (Great Barrier) Marine Reserve Application An application by the Director-General of Conservation AUCKLAND CONSERVANCY JULY 2004 Published by Auckland Conservancy Department of Conservation Private Bag 68-908 Newton Auckland New Zealand Cover photo: Aerial view of Great Barrier Island’s north-east coast Photo: Graeme Brierly ISBN 0-478-22587-3 CROWN COPYRIGHT 2 Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................5 1.1 APPLICATION FOR A MARINE RESERVE AT GREAT BARRIER ISLAND .....5 1.2 PURPOSE OF MARINE RESERVES ................................................................5 1.3 ROLE OF THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION.........................5 1.4 PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHING A MARINE RESERVE ...................................5 1.5 RESPONSES INVITED ...................................................................................5 2. The Application ..................................................................................7 2.1 THE APPLICANT ..........................................................................................7 2.2 LOCATION ...................................................................................................7 2.3 NAME............................................................................................................7 2.4 OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................7 2.5 BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • VISITOR STRATEGY AOTEA Great Barrier Island 2018-2023
    Table of contents: Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Context ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Core strategy areas .................................................................................................................... 6 Governance ............................................................................................................................ 6 Shaping demand: Information and Image ............................................................................. 9 Experience development ..................................................................................................... 12 Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................... 17 Insight ................................................................................................................................... 19 Implementation - Looking Forward ......................................................................................... 20 Appendix 1: Aotea / Great Barrier Island Sustainable Tourism Indicators.............................. 22 Acknowledgements Cover photos: Courtesy of Great Barrier Local Board, Hilde Hoven, and Suzanne Histen In September 2017, Great Barrier Local Board (GBLB), with support from Auckland Tourism Events and Economic Development
    [Show full text]
  • Dog Exercise Areas
    Summary of the public places where dogs are allowed on Great Barrier Island (Great Barrier and Waiheke Local Board areas) This information only applies to park, beach and foreshore areas under the control of Auckland Council or the Department of Conservation. Be a responsible dog owner • Keep your dog under control at all times. • Respect other people’s personal space. Public places are for everyone’s enjoyment and not everyone is fond of dogs. Remember, under control off-leash areas are shared spaces. • Pick up after your dog and carry something (e.g. a bag or pooper scooper) to pick-up your dogs’ faeces. Dog faeces should be disposed of in bins. • Know when your dog will ignore commands: put dog on-leash, shorten leash, or avoid the area altogether - even if you are in an off-leash area. Under control off-leash areas On Great Barrier Island, dogs are allowed under control off a leash in the following areas: • Gooseberry Flat**. Northern end to the bluff, including bluff around to the public toilets and including headland reserve between Gooseberry Flat and Pa Beach. • Okiwi northern side of airstrip next to the Okiwi airfield. Under control on-leash areas Dogs are allowed under control on a leash on all park and foreshore areas not specifically identified as a prohibited or off-leash area. Restricted areas There are areas where you may need a permission to access with your dog or where dog access varies depending on the time of day or year. Beaches on Great Barrier Island: • Dogs are allowed under control off a leash in: o Awana Beach.
    [Show full text]