Background Vocalist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Background Vocalist Background Vocalist PRIMARY GENRE R&B The following is the breakdown of 2009-2010 income from a Soul Background Vocalist, who performs as a background singer on Pop network TV, live on tour, and on recordings. She also writes songs and SECONDARY GENRE performs and records her own music as a solo artist. She produces Jazz records for herself and others. Electronica Rock For the purposes of this case study, we will look at her income from her work as a session musician and background vocalist only – both in ROLES the studio and live on tour. TV background performer Film background performer Live background performer This Background Vocalist tours regularly as a background vocalist Background recording artist for several different featured artists. Previous tours have included performances at concert halls, theaters, opera houses, resorts, YEARS ACTIVE and festivals. She is also part of the regular “music crew” – as a 1997 – present background vocalist – on a live network television program with a house band, appearing on 34 episodes over four seasons. She has TIME SPENT ON MUSIC 100% also performed on over 50 recordings as a background vocalist for more than 30 different artists. INCOME DERIVED FROM MUSIC 100% The Background Vocalist does not have formal musical training. She is a member of SAG-AFTRA, NARAS, SoundExchange, and ASCAP, and is registered with the AFM & SAG-AFTRA Fund. Through her affiliation with SAG-AFTRA, she qualifies for health insurance and earns pension credits. She does not have a manager or bookkeeper. money.futureofmusic.org/case-studies CASE STUDY | Background Vocalist A note about session work They might call themselves background musicians or sidemen, guest musicians, session musicians, freelance musicians, or backup singers. To simplify the language for this study we call them all session musicians. These are the musicians and singers who are usually hired by a producer, record label, featured artist or bandleader to perform in a live or broadcast setting or on a recording. Session musicians can solo, may get billing, or even appear to be a regular member of a band. What makes them different than featured artists is that session musicians are paid a fee or a predictable salary for their time and expertise as musicians or singers. Generally, they do not assume any of the risk in a recording or live performance endeavor; they get paid even if the recording or tour loses money. Session musicians often accept a buyout – a one-time payment for work in a recording studio or in a live performance in exchange for signing over most or all of their rights. While they are entitled to some income that flows from copyright, session musicians are not considered the featured artist in a performance or recording. This is not a hard and fast category. Like everything else in the music business, the lines between roles are fluid. Color coding for Background Vocalist We have tried to use a consistent color palette across all the graphs and charts we have generated as part of the Artist Revenue Streams work. For instance, income from compositions is red, and live performance work is blue. We have used shades of these colors to signify specific types of revenue in these broad categories. If we were to religiously stick to this color palette when describing this Background Vocalist’s income, the graphs and charts would all be shades of teal, as all of her income included in this case study is session work, in one form or another. In order to provide a visual differentiation, we have added another color to the palette. In the case of AY, her TV- and film-based session work is brown. money.futureofmusic.org/case-studies 2 CASE STUDY | Background Vocalist About Television and Film Work, Appearance Fees and Mailbox Money All payments for this Background Vocalist’s television and film appearances are governed by the union scale, which is a standardized rate negotiated by SAG-AFTRA (AFL-CIO) – the union that represents vocalists who perform on television, film and radio. (Instrumentalists are represented by AFM, the American Federation of Musicians.) These rates for film and television session work are usually renegotiated every three years between SAG-AFTRA and the employers (record companies, TV and film producers, commercial producers, network TV, etc). • Musician appearances on television can range from being in a house band for a live show (as on many late night shows), to appearing on a scripted television show with musical numbers (ex. Glee), appearing as a special guest on a program like a talk show, or appearing on a musical contest show. • Musician appearances on film can range from on-camera acting or singing to off- camera singing (i.e. an animated musical feature film of the kind that Disney often makes) to using previously recorded tracks (if these tracks were originally recorded under a union contract). There are set rates for each kind of appearance. For more specifics on how much artists who are covered by SAG-AFTRA get paid for various television and recording appearances, refer to http://www.sagaftra.org/production-center. In this report, we refer to two different categories of payment for television and film work. When the artist goes into the television or film studio and performs, we call it a “TV/Film Appearance.” If the television show or film does well, the artist shares in the success of the show and will continue to get royalty checks or residual payments (which we call “TV/ Film Mailbox Money”) when the show is rebroadcast, when there are new uses (e.g. DVD, iTunes), and when the artist is entitled to a portion of royalties (e.g. foreign use) from various uses of the show. We use the phrase “mailbox money” here because artists sometimes refer to this second category of payments that way. Some of these additional payments are explained below in Appendix A which is an overview of how SAG-AFTRA calculates mailbox money in different media. money.futureofmusic.org/case-studies 3 CASE STUDY | Background Vocalist Gross Revenue This section reviews the overall gross income numbers for 2009-2010 for this Background Vocalist, as well as definitions for each category. Gross Revenue, 2009-2010 Recording TV/Film Live Performance 2009 2010 In 2009-2010, the Background Vocalist makes 52% of her income from TV and film work, both from appearance fees as a background/session vocalist on a popular TV network talent show where she is a salaried performer, and from TV/film “mailbox money” from previous TV and film appearances as a background/session vocalist. Performing as a background vocalist in live performances on tour, primarily with one artist, makes up 41% of her income in 2009-2010. The remaining 7% comes from her work as a background/session musician in the recording studio, and consists of both direct session payments for her time spent in the recording studio and regular (annual) income streams from “recording mailbox money” from the AFM & SAG- AFTRA Fund for her work as a background/session musician. Graphs do not have a Y-axis dollar value in order to observe the conditions of our privacy policy. In addition, graphs and visuals in case studies are not comparable within or between case studies. Information detailed in case studies is based on data received directly from the artist or their authorized representative. The data analysis and lessons learned here are based on individual experience, and do not necessarily reflect the experiences of all musicians in genre or roles. Case studies are one of three ways this project is looking at musician income. Learn about methodology at money.futureofmusic.org. money.futureofmusic.org/case-studies 4 CASE STUDY | Background Vocalist Gross Revenue, 2009 Gross Revenue, 2009 In 2009, the Background Vocalist performed TV/Film Appearance as a live background vocalist on many 22% performances with mostly one featured artist, and also appeared as a live background Live Performance Studio Recording 4% vocalist at a few other events. As a salaried 56% crew member, she taped episodes of her TV/Film Mailbox Recording Money current primary TV show. Since her primary TV Mailbox Money 17% 1% show is popular, she also received new use fees for taping episodes of a related spin-off talent show that uses footage from the primary show. This Background Vocalist also received fees for performing on studio soundtrack recordings of her primary TV show. She received TV mailbox money for two previous seasons of her current primary show, from her previous primary television show (on which she appeared on numerous episodes over six seasons in the late 90s-early 00s) as well as from other television appearances. Most of this mailbox money was for domestic syndication and foreign use. She also received recording mailbox money from studio recording credits with seven artists from recordings released from 1998-2002; all were recorded under SAG-AFTRA contracts. This Background Vocalist appeared on three recordings that came out in 2009. Two of these were soundtrack collections related to her current and previous television work. One was a greatest hits compilation of songs recorded with a featured artist years previously. All were released on major labels. Only one of these was recorded in 2009; the others were recorded in previous years. Revenue Category 2009 Details Background Vocalist 55.4% 72 engagements with five different groups Live Performance TV/Film Appearances 21.5% For 10 appearances on 2 television shows for work as a salaried performer Cable, Domestic Syndication, and Foreign royalties for 2 seasons of Artist AY’s TV/Film Mailbox Money 17.4% current primary show, 6 other television appearances, 1 film appearance from 2009 and 1 film appearance from 2004 Session Musician in Fees for recording sessions associated with current primary show for 1 audio major 4.4% Studio label release.
Recommended publications
  • Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Ledger
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW LEDGER VOLUME 1 WINTER 2009 NUMBER 1 MIXED SIGNALS: TAKEDOWN BUT DON’T FILTER? A CASE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE AUTHORIZATION * VICTORIA ELMAN AND CINDY ABRAMSON Scribd, a social publishing website, is being sued for copyright infringement for allowing the uploading of infringing works, and also for using the works themselves to filter for copyrighted work upon receipt of a takedown notice. While Scribd has a possible fair use defense, given the transformative function of the filtering use, Victoria Elman and Cindy Abramson argue that such filtration systems ought not to constitute infringement, as long as the sole purpose is to prevent infringement. American author Elaine Scott has recently filed suit against Scribd, alleging that the social publishing website “shamelessly profits” by encouraging Internet users to illegally share copyrighted books online.1 Scribd enables users to upload a variety of written works much like YouTube enables the uploading of video * Victoria Elman received a B.A. from Columbia University and a J.D. from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in 2009 where she was a Notes Editor of the Cardozo Law Review. She will be joining Goodwin Procter this January as an associate in the New York office. Cindy Abramson is an associate in the Litigation Department in the New York office of Morrison & Foerster LLP. She recieved her J.D. from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in 2009 where she completed concentrations in Intellectual Property and Litigation and was Senior Notes Editor of the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of Morrison & Foerster, LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Doubles and Doubling in Tarchetti, Capuana, and De Marchi By
    Uncanny Resemblances: Doubles and Doubling in Tarchetti, Capuana, and De Marchi by Christina A. Petraglia A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Italian) At the University of Wisconsin-Madison 2012 Date of oral examination: December 12, 2012 Oral examination committee: Professor Stefania Buccini, Italian Professor Ernesto Livorni (advisor), Italian Professor Grazia Menechella, Italian Professor Mario Ortiz-Robles, English Professor Patrick Rumble, Italian i Table of Contents Introduction – The (Super)natural Double in the Fantastic Fin de Siècle…………………….1 Chapter 1 – Fantastic Phantoms and Gothic Guys: Super-natural Doubles in Iginio Ugo Tarchetti’s Racconti fantastici e Fosca………………………………………………………35 Chapter 2 – Oneiric Others and Pathological (Dis)pleasures: Luigi Capuana’s Clinical Doubles in “Un caso di sonnambulismo,” “Il sogno di un musicista,” and Profumo……………………………………………………………………………………..117 Chapter 3 – “There’s someone in my head and it’s not me:” The Double Inside-out in Emilio De Marchi’s Early Novels…………………..……………………………………………...222 Conclusion – Three’s a Fantastic Crowd……………………...……………………………322 1 The (Super)natural Double in the Fantastic Fin de Siècle: The disintegration of the subject is most often underlined as a predominant trope in Italian literature of the Twentieth Century; the so-called “crisi del Novecento” surfaces in anthologies and literary histories in reference to writers such as Pascoli, D’Annunzio, Pirandello, and Svevo.1 The divided or multifarious identity stretches across the Twentieth Century from Luigi Pirandello’s unforgettable Mattia Pascal / Adriano Meis, to Ignazio Silone’s Pietro Spina / Paolo Spada, to Italo Calvino’s il visconte dimezzato; however, its precursor may be found decades before in such diverse representations of subject fissure and fusion as embodied in Iginio Ugo Tarchetti’s Giorgio, Luigi Capuana’s detective Van-Spengel, and Emilio De Marchi’s Marcello Marcelli.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Outlines
    CHAPTER FOURTEEN: “SMELLS LIKE TEEN SPIRIT”: HIP-HOP, “ALTERNATIVE” MUSIC, AND THE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS Lecture Outlines Lecture 1: Hip-Hop and Techno I. Hip-Hop Breaks Out (1980s–1990s) A. In the mid-1980s, rap moved into the popular mainstream. B. 1986 saw the release of the first two multiplatinum rap albums: 1. Raising Hell by Run-D.M.C. a) Number Three on Billboard’s pop albums chart b) Over three million copies sold 2. Licensed to Ill by the Beastie Boys a) Number One for seven weeks b) Over seven million copies sold 3. Expansion of the audience for hip-hop music was the key to the commercial success of these albums. a) Included millions of young white fans, attracted by the rebelliousness of the genre C. Both Raising Hell and Licensed to Ill were released on a new independent label called Def Jam. CHAPTER FOURTEEN: “SMELLS LIKE TEEN SPIRIT”: HIP-HOP, “ALTERNATIVE” MUSIC, AND THE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS 1. Co-founded in 1984 by the hip-hop promoter Russell Simmons and the musician-producer Rick Rubin 2. Cross-promoting a new generation of artists 3. Expanding and diversifying the national audience for hip-hop 4. In 1986, Def Jam became the first rap-oriented independent label to sign a distribution deal with one of the “Big Five” record companies, Columbia Records. D. Run-D.M.C. 1. Trio: a) MCs Run (Joseph Simmons, b. 1964) and D.M.C. (Darryl McDaniels, b. 1964) b) DJ Jam Master Jay (Jason Mizell, b. 1965) 2. Adidas Corporation and Run-D.M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Neglected Jazz Figures of the 1950S and Early 1960S New World NW 275
    Introspection: Neglected Jazz Figures of the 1950s and early 1960s New World NW 275 In the contemporary world of platinum albums and music stations that have adopted limited programming (such as choosing from the Top Forty), even the most acclaimed jazz geniuses—the Armstrongs, Ellingtons, and Parkers—are neglected in terms of the amount of their music that gets heard. Acknowledgment by critics and historians works against neglect, of course, but is no guarantee that a musician will be heard either, just as a few records issued under someone’s name are not truly synonymous with attention. In this album we are concerned with musicians who have found it difficult—occasionally impossible—to record and publicly perform their own music. These six men, who by no means exhaust the legion of the neglected, are linked by the individuality and high quality of their conceptions, as well as by the tenaciousness of their struggle to maintain those conceptions in a world that at best has remained indifferent. Such perseverance in a hostile environment suggests the familiar melodramatic narrative of the suffering artist, and indeed these men have endured a disproportionate share of misfortunes and horrors. That four of the six are now dead indicates the severity of the struggle; the enduring strength of their music, however, is proof that none of these artists was ultimately defeated. Selecting the fifties and sixties as the focus for our investigation is hardly mandatory, for we might look back to earlier years and consider such players as Joe Smith (1902-1937), the supremely lyrical trumpeter who contributed so much to the music of Bessie Smith and Fletcher Henderson; or Dick Wilson (1911-1941), the promising tenor saxophonist featured with Andy Kirk’s Clouds of Joy; or Frankie Newton (1906-1954), whose unique muted-trumpet sound was overlooked during the swing era and whose leftist politics contributed to further neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Recording and the Music Business
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 4-30-2017 An Exploration of Recording and the Music Business Erika Nalow [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Arts Management Commons, Audio Arts and Acoustics Commons, and the Music Performance Commons Repository Citation Nalow, Erika, "An Exploration of Recording and the Music Business" (2017). Honors Projects. 258. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/258 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Erika Nalow HNRS 4990 Honors Project Conclusion An Exploration of Recording and the Music Business The following questions were initially proposed during the planning of my Honors Project. I have chosen to organize the final project results around these questions and how they were specifically answered through conducting my creative project. “Can an independent artist record, mix, produce, promote, and distribute their own original work successfully?” o To answer this part of the research thoroughly, I will give a detailed recitation of the planning and execution of this project. This project began with me writing an original song entitled “Upside Down.” After composing it, I went to my project advisor, Mark Bunce, and reserved a day in the Kuhlin Center recording studio on BGSU’s campus to record the song. I then arranged additional music for the song- writing parts for trombone, trumpet, alto saxophone, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, bass, drums, piano, and vocals.
    [Show full text]
  • Cool Trombone Lover
    NOVEMBER 2013 - ISSUE 139 YOUR FREE GUIDE TO THE NYC JAZZ SCENE NYCJAZZRECORD.COM ROSWELL RUDD COOL TROMBONE LOVER MICHEL • DAVE • GEORGE • RELATIVE • EVENT CAMILO KING FREEMAN PITCH CALENDAR “BEST JAZZ CLUBS OF THE YEAR 2012” SMOKE JAZZ & SUPPER CLUB • HARLEM, NEW YORK CITY FEATURED ARTISTS / 7:00, 9:00 & 10:30pm ONE NIGHT ONLY / 7:00, 9:00 & 10:30pm RESIDENCIES / 7:00, 9:00 & 10:30pm Fri & Sat, Nov 1 & 2 Wed, Nov 6 Sundays, Nov 3 & 17 GARY BARTZ QUARTET PLUS MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ QUINTET Michael Rodriguez (tp) ● Chris Cheek (ts) SaRon Crenshaw Band SPECIAL GUEST VINCENT HERRING Jeb Patton (p) ● Kiyoshi Kitagawa (b) Sundays, Nov 10 & 24 Gary Bartz (as) ● Vincent Herring (as) Obed Calvaire (d) Vivian Sessoms Sullivan Fortner (p) ● James King (b) ● Greg Bandy (d) Wed, Nov 13 Mondays, Nov 4 & 18 Fri & Sat, Nov 8 & 9 JACK WALRATH QUINTET Jason Marshall Big Band BILL STEWART QUARTET Jack Walrath (tp) ● Alex Foster (ts) Mondays, Nov 11 & 25 Chris Cheek (ts) ● Kevin Hays (p) George Burton (p) ● tba (b) ● Donald Edwards (d) Captain Black Big Band Doug Weiss (b) ● Bill Stewart (d) Wed, Nov 20 Tuesdays, Nov 5, 12, 19, & 26 Fri & Sat, Nov 15 & 16 BOB SANDS QUARTET Mike LeDonne’s Groover Quartet “OUT AND ABOUT” CD RELEASE LOUIS HAYES Bob Sands (ts) ● Joel Weiskopf (p) Thursdays, Nov 7, 14, 21 & 28 & THE JAZZ COMMUNICATORS Gregg August (b) ● Donald Edwards (d) Gregory Generet Abraham Burton (ts) ● Steve Nelson (vibes) Kris Bowers (p) ● Dezron Douglas (b) ● Louis Hayes (d) Wed, Nov 27 RAY MARCHICA QUARTET LATE NIGHT RESIDENCIES / 11:30 - Fri & Sat, Nov 22 & 23 FEATURING RODNEY JONES Mon The Smoke Jam Session Chase Baird (ts) ● Rodney Jones (guitar) CYRUS CHESTNUT TRIO Tue Cyrus Chestnut (p) ● Curtis Lundy (b) ● Victor Lewis (d) Mike LeDonne (organ) ● Ray Marchica (d) Milton Suggs Quartet Wed Brianna Thomas Quartet Fri & Sat, Nov 29 & 30 STEVE DAVIS SEXTET JAZZ BRUNCH / 11:30am, 1:00 & 2:30pm Thu Nickel and Dime OPS “THE MUSIC OF J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • RIAA'') Is Pleased to Provide
    Before the UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE Washington, D.C. In the Matter of: Docket No. 2014-03 Music Licensing Study: Notice and Request for Public Comment COMMENTS OF THE RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. ("RIAA'') is pleased to provide these Comments in response to the Copyright Office's Notice oflnquiry ("NOI") in the above- captioned proceeding. See Music Licensing Study: Notice and Request for Public Comment, 79 Fed. Reg. 14,739 (Mar. 17, 2014). RIAA is the trade association that represents the music companies that create, manufacture and/or distribute approximately 85% of all legitimate recorded music produced and sold in the United States. The issues raised in the NOi are critically important to RIAA's members. The musical works they license to include in their releases are an essential part of those releases, and they are major licensees of musical works. They are also copyright owners or distributors of audio-only and audiovisual sound recording releases accounting for the vast majority of music usage. Sound recordings and the musical works incorporated therein are subject to disparate licensing systems, including three completely separate systems just for musical works (i.e., for mechanical, performance and synchronization rights). Unfortunately, while the systems for sound recordings are working reasonably well in many respects, there is an emerging consensus that the systems for licensing musical works are not. Accordingly, the question is not whether change would be desirable, but whether it will be possible to achieve consensus concerning what changes should be made to improve musical work licensing.
    [Show full text]
  • 59Th Annual Critics Poll
    Paul Maria Abbey Lincoln Rudresh Ambrose Schneider Chambers Akinmusire Hall of Fame Poll Winners Paul Motian Craig Taborn Mahanthappa 66 Album Picks £3.50 £3.50 .K. U 59th Annual Critics Poll Critics Annual 59th The Critics’ Pick Critics’ The Artist, Jazz for Album Jazz and Piano UGUST 2011 MORAN Jason DOWNBEAT.COM A DOWNBEAT 59TH ANNUAL CRITICS POLL // ABBEY LINCOLN // PAUL CHAMBERS // JASON MORAN // AMBROSE AKINMUSIRE AU G U S T 2011 AUGUST 2011 VOLUme 78 – NUMBER 8 President Kevin Maher Publisher Frank Alkyer Managing Editor Bobby Reed Associate Editor Aaron Cohen Contributing Editor Ed Enright Art Director Ara Tirado Production Associate Andy Williams Bookkeeper Margaret Stevens Circulation Manager Sue Mahal Circulation Assistant Evelyn Oakes ADVERTISING SALES Record Companies & Schools Jennifer Ruban-Gentile 630-941-2030 [email protected] Musical Instruments & East Coast Schools Ritche Deraney 201-445-6260 [email protected] Advertising Sales Assistant Theresa Hill 630-941-2030 [email protected] OFFICES 102 N. Haven Road Elmhurst, IL 60126–2970 630-941-2030 Fax: 630-941-3210 http://downbeat.com [email protected] CUSTOMER SERVICE 877-904-5299 [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS Senior Contributors: Michael Bourne, John McDonough Atlanta: Jon Ross; Austin: Michael Point, Kevin Whitehead; Boston: Fred Bouchard, Frank-John Hadley; Chicago: John Corbett, Alain Drouot, Michael Jackson, Peter Margasak, Bill Meyer, Mitch Myers, Paul Natkin, Howard Reich; Denver: Norman Provizer; Indiana: Mark Sheldon; Iowa: Will Smith; Los Angeles: Earl Gibson, Todd Jenkins, Kirk Silsbee, Chris Walker, Joe Woodard; Michigan: John Ephland; Minneapolis: Robin James; Nashville: Bob Doerschuk; New Or- leans: Erika Goldring, David Kunian, Jennifer Odell; New York: Alan Bergman, Herb Boyd, Bill Douthart, Ira Gitler, Eugene Gologursky, Norm Harris, D.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision Guide
    Music Industry Revision Guide MUSICIAN LIVE SOUND TECHNICIAN (1) Carry out sound checks before show (1) Train and practise regularly to keep (2) Choose suitable microphones and equipment instrumental skills to a high standard (3) Position and rig-up microphones (2) Turn up on time and prepared (4) Operate the sound desk during a performance (3) Look after instrument/voice (4) Learn new music for a show (5) Perform at various venues MUSICAL DIRECTOR / Sound Desk CONDUCTOR Performance (1) Unify performers (2) Set tempo and execute clear & Creative performance indications by conducting (3) Give instructions and shape the sound Roles of the ensemble, e.g. orchestra, choir (4) Choose the music and study the scores (5) Relay ideas to performers COMPOSER/ SONG-WRITER (1) Compose music for a TV programme INSTRUMENTAL SUPPORT (2) Write a song for a famous singer (3) Keep to a deadline ROADIE (1) Takes care of instruments (4) Work with the performers to ensure (1) Carry equipment (2) Provides backline technical support for composition/song is at a suitable standard (2) Set up before event a band (5) Check and liaise with employer (whoever (3) Look after equipment (3) Gives advice to band of best equipment commissioned composition) to make sure (4) Pack away after event (4) Fixes broken guitar strings or other the music fits what is asked equipment during a show MASTERING ENGINEER: SESSION MUSICIAN (1) Does the final edit (changes) of the recording (1) Turn up on time creating the final ‘master’ version (2) Rehearse the given music and keep (2)
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for the Arts N Music Letter from the Chancellor
    Grades PreK - 12 - PreK Grades For Teaching and Learning in Learning and Teaching For Office of Arts and Special Projects New York City Department of Education 52 Chambers Street, Room 205 New York, New York 10007 Phone: 212.374.0300 Fax: 212.374.5598 Email: [email protected] website: schools.nyc.gov/artseducation New York City Department of Education © 2005 Carmen Fariña, Chancellor Second Edition (2008) Contributors Third Edition (2015) Contributors Dorita Gibson, Senior Deputy Chancellor Phil Weinberg, Deputy Chancellor of Teaching Music Curriculum Development Co-Chairs Music Educators, Music Curriculum Development Co-Chairs New York City Department of Education and Learning Barbara Murray, Director of Music Programs Barbara Murray, Director of Music Anna Commitante, Senior Executive Director, Office of Arts and Special Projects, Donald Christiansen Robert Lamont, Music Consultant Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Learning New York City Department of Education Roberta Feldhusen Paul King, Executive Director, Office of Arts and Shellie Bransford, Music Consultant Janet Grice Special Projects Elizabeth Norman, Director of Education, Elizabeth Guglielmo Music Educators, St. Luke’s Orchestra New York City Department of Education First Edition (2004) Contributors Jaime Jacobs Gregory Pierson, Director of Education, Maria Schwab Eric Dalio Music Curriculum Development Co-Chairs Brooklyn Philharmonic Thomas Toriello Elaine Fauria Nancy Shankman, Director of Music/ George Wanat Ian Kanakaris Deputy Senior Instructional Manager for Arts Education Moishe Weidenfeld Music from the Inside Out Contributors Portia Lagares Thomas Cabaniss, Director of Education, Jerome Korman, Project Director, Music Consultant, New York Philharmonic Office of Arts and Special Projects Cultural and University Community Music Educators, Nancy Shankman, Director of Music, Deputy Senior Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Twitch’s Rockonomics Introduction 3 Part 1: Twitch Distinctions 8 Part 2: Twitch True Fans 18 Part 3: Twitch In Action 27 Closing Remarks 43 About The Author 46 Partners 47 Acknowledgements 48 #twitchrockonomics Live streaming won’t go away when live music returns. This inquiry into Twitch helps us understand how they may co-exist. ‘If you keep the full $100 of each true fan, then you need only 1,000 of them to earn $100,000 per year.’ Kevin Kelly, The Technium, 2008 Kevin Kelly’s 2008 1000 True Fans essay is making something of a comeback, as many artists today are feeling short-changed from their paltry music streaming royalties. In a recent Harvard Business Review article that’s rich in media theory, Li Jin argues that ‘The Creator Economy Needs a Middle Class’. Jin encourages us to rethink media, and Kelly’s essay suggests a remedy, which Twitch is strongly positioned to provide. Twitch offers a unique way for artists to reach fans and earn money. The growing criticism from music industry trade bodies about Twitch’s licensing strategy appears to be based on a misunderstanding of what Twitch is and isn’t That takes us to the threefold objective of this – which is understandable, given that live inquiry. Getting exclusive access to data (and streaming on Twitch is a new paradigm. Key to data scientists) from Twitch, MRC Data and this seachange are Twitch’s roots in the culture ChartMetric has allowed me to: of gaming. You can bring a horse to water, or you (i) establish what makes Twitch distinct; can bring water to the horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Session and Guest Musicians
    Sessionand Guert Musicians Tbe aiewsand opinions expressedin this article part of your group by virtue of their NeighbouringRights not n eant to substitute for legal adztice contribution or where they have performed Neighbouring rights are an exciting wbich should be sougbt in eacb partimlar for free. development for session musicians. While "neighbouring Youcanhelp avoid such complications by not a copyright per se, rights including in the contract a declaration that are the performance rights performers Introduction you are the exclusive owner of the entire have in their performances, the makers of right, tide and interest in and to all of the Whether you are a major label recording sound recordings have in their recordings, 'artist masters that are the subject matter of the or an independentmusician paying for and broadcasters have in the communication Agreement (Sanderson,3lT), free of any (Paul own recording, you may occasionally signals they broadcast" Sanderson's, claims bythe session musician. Furthermore, ire a sessionmusician to record tracks on Musicians and the Lazl In Canada, pg. 15). you may stipulate that the session musician your record.Session musicians could include Neighbouring rights became statutory after irrevocably assigns to you, in perpetuity, all backupvocalist, cello players,a hot guitar t l99V amendment to the Copyright Act, ffia righs in and to said recordinp, thus ensuring and shortly thereafter the Neighbouring brought in to spiceup a recording, "hired S Nplayer that the gun" retains no stock in the * =ffio. it could include an entire bandbrought Rights Collective of Canada (I\trRCC) was material beyond fulfillment of the to playbehindavocalist.
    [Show full text]