New Look New Content Same Great Alumni
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Texas Board of Education Considers Adding Mexican-American Studies
A&E p. 8 baylorlariat com 6 Art on Elm Avenue celebrates Waco artists and brings together East and BaylorLariat downtown Waco. WE’RE THERE WHEN YOU CAN’T BE Wednesday | April 9, 2014 West one year later By Kat Worrall said. “We prayed with them. We Staff Writer tried to provide as much support and manpower that we possibly When the West fertilizer plant could. To see them not forgetting suddenly exploded last April, the what has occurred, but to continue media and emergency response to move forward and strengthen teams scrambled to respond. their community, we are very Now, nearly one year after the proud and humbled to be their explosion that left 15 dead and neighbors.” over 160 wounded, a panel discus- Swanton was one of the first sion and luncheon Thursday will responders to the emergency and spotlight the lessons, triumphs and served as the public information mistakes made with the communi- officer for the media. Swanton said cation following the disaster. he was “stingy” with the informa- “West Revisited: One Year Lat- tion first released, as he wanted to er” will be held from 11 a.m. to 1 ensure any released information CARLYE THORNTON | PHOTOGRAPHER p.m. Thursday in the Texas Ranger was verified. Hall of Fame and Museum. West “The goal was to number one, Mayor Tommy Muska, Sgt. Pat- get out safety information to any- Laid back in a kayak rick Swanton of the Waco Police body that was possibly still there San Diego, Calif., senior Andre Jackson paddles out onto the river to enjoy a Tuesday afternoon at the Baylor Marina. -
November 2, 2018 the Honorable Henry J. Kerner Special Counsel
November 2, 2018 The Honorable Henry J. Kerner Special Counsel Office of Special Counsel 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 Re: Violation of the Hatch Act by Seema Verma Dear Special Counsel Kerner: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) respectfully requests that the Office of Special Counsel (“OSC”) investigate whether Seema Verma, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), violated the Hatch Act by using an official government social media account to advocate against a political party and by participating in her official capacity in a video opinion piece by former Trump campaign senior advisor Boris Epshteyn. Factual Background The Senate confirmed Ms. Verma for her current position on March 13, 2017.1 The official CMS website explains that “[a]s Administrator, Ms. Verma oversees a $1 trillion budget, 26% of the total federal budget, and administers healthcare programs for more than 130 million Americans every day.”2 In that capacity, Ms. Verma maintains an official government social media account on Twitter, with the handle Administrator Seema Verma, @SeemaCMS.3 Her account identifies her by the following biographical details: “Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Mother and Wife. Proud alum of @UofMaryland and @JohnsHopkins Univ.”4 The CMS agency Twitter account, @CMSGov, frequently retweets her postings from her official account.5 On the afternoon of October 31, 2018, Ms. Verma tweeted a number of political messages transparently designed to influence the upcoming midterm elections. One such message was Ms. Verma’s retweet of a tweet by former Trump campaign senior advisor Boris Epshteyn attacking the Democratic party: “.@SeemaCMS believes that the Democrat-backed 1 See CMS (website), Administrator, https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/leadership/ (last viewed Nov. -
Roman Popadiuk
White House Interview Program DATE: November 2, 1999 INTERVIEWEE: ROMAN POPADIUK INTERVIEWER: Martha Kumar [Disc 1 of 1] MK: It’s on the record except where you want to go on background or off the record. Ultimately, it will end up in the library. RP: This library? MK: Yes. You get a choice of what library it goes into so I’m assuming it will be in this library. The project is trying to develop an institutional memory for seven White House offices, and Press [Office] is one of them. It’s a group of presidency scholars that are working on the project. George Edwards is one of them. We will come out in March or April with a group of standards of a successful start, which are some elements that are common to successful transitions. Then the offices’ material will be made available; some of it will probably be made available at the time the transition teams are put together. The full text of interviews will not be released until after a new president comes in. RP: Okay. Sounds good. MK: Starting off, can you talk about how you got into the White House, and how long you were? Let’s start with that, and how you got in. RP: How I actually got in to the White House? MK: Yes. RP: Well, it was back in February of 1985, but I didn’t start in the Press Office. I’ll give you a long story here. Prior to that I was in the operations [center] over at the State Department, one of the watch officers/editors I guess we were called, if I recall correctly. -
Race Ipsa Loquitur
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2019 Race Ipsa Loquitur Girardeau A. Spann Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2160 2018 Mich. St. L. Rev. 1025. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons RACE IPSA LOQUITUR Girardeau A. Spann* 2018 MICH. ST. L. REV. 1025 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1025 I. DISCRIMINATION .................................................................... 1030 A. Then ............................................................................... 1030 B. Now ............................................................................... 1034 1. Money ...................................................................... 1036 2. Education ................................................................ 1039 3. Employment ............................................................. 1041 4. Health ...................................................................... 1043 5. Housing ................................................................... 1046 6. Voting ...................................................................... 1049 7. Criminal Justice ..................................................... -
ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS -
The 2020 Election 2 Contents
Covering the Coverage The 2020 Election 2 Contents 4 Foreword 29 Us versus him Kyle Pope Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 5 Why did Matt Drudge turn on August 10, 2020 Donald Trump? Bob Norman 37 The campaign begins (again) January 29, 2020 Kyle Pope August 12, 2020 8 One America News was desperate for Trump’s approval. 39 When the pundits paused Here’s how it got it. Simon van Zuylen–Wood Andrew McCormick Summer 2020 May 27, 2020 47 Tuned out 13 The story has gotten away from Adam Piore us Summer 2020 Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 57 ‘This is a moment for June 3, 2020 imagination’ Mychal Denzel Smith, Josie Duffy 22 For Facebook, a boycott and a Rice, and Alex Vitale long, drawn-out reckoning Summer 2020 Emily Bell July 9, 2020 61 How to deal with friends who have become obsessed with 24 As election looms, a network conspiracy theories of mysterious ‘pink slime’ local Mathew Ingram news outlets nearly triples in size August 25, 2020 Priyanjana Bengani August 4, 2020 64 The only question in news is ‘Will it rate?’ Ariana Pekary September 2, 2020 3 66 Last night was the logical end 92 The Doociness of America point of debates in America Mark Oppenheimer Jon Allsop October 29, 2020 September 30, 2020 98 How careful local reporting 68 How the media has abetted the undermined Trump’s claims of Republican assault on mail-in voter fraud voting Ian W. Karbal Yochai Benkler November 3, 2020 October 2, 2020 101 Retire the election needles 75 Catching on to Q Gabriel Snyder Sam Thielman November 4, 2020 October 9, 2020 102 What the polls show, and the 78 We won’t know what will happen press missed, again on November 3 until November 3 Kyle Pope Kyle Paoletta November 4, 2020 October 15, 2020 104 How conservative media 80 E. -
February 2014 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data
February 2014 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data February 2, 2014 29 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 8 men and 2 women Denis McDonough (M) Sen. Tim Scott (M) Julian Assange (M) Rich Lowry (M) Robert Gibbs (M) Gwen Ifill (F) Doris Kearns Goodwin (F) Chuck Todd (M) Alan Schwartz (M) Tony Dungy (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 6 men and 1 woman Rep. Eric Cantor (M) Denis McDonough (M) Fmr. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) David Gergen (M) Michael Gerson (M) Bob Shrum (M) Kimberly Strassell (F) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 4 men and 2 women Rep. Paul Ryan (M) Donna Brazile (F) Matthew Dowd (M) Bill Kristol (M) Paul Krugman (M) Ana Navarro (F) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 3 men and 1 woman Gov. Bobby Jindal (M) Anita Dunn (F) Ron Brownstein (M) Fmr. Rep. Artur Davis (M) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 8 men and 0 women Roger Goodell (M) John Elway (M) Archie Manning (M) Terry Bradshaw (M) Howie Long (M) Jimmy Johnson (M) Michael Strahan (M) Troy Aikman (M) February 9, 2014 27 men and 13 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 7 men and 3 women U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul (M) Sen. Chuck Schumer (M) Sen. Rob Portman (M) Jonathan Allen (M) Amie Parnes (F) Andrea Mitchell (F) David Brooks (M) E.J. Dionne (M) Mona Sutphen (F) Mike Needham (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 5 men and 3 women Rep. -
Decaro, Frank (B
DeCaro, Frank (b. 1962) by Linda Rapp Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Frank DeCaro on the set of the Game Show Entry Copyright © 2006 glbtq, Inc. Network's I've Got a Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Secret in 2006. Courtesy the Game Frank DeCaro has found success both in serious journalism as a fashion writer and Show Network. editor and in comedy as a writer, performer, and radio talk show host. Frank DeCaro's future existence came as a great surprise to his parents, Frank and Marion LaRegina DeCaro. After a decade of marriage, during which they had endured the painful experience of three miscarriages, they had given up the hope of having children, but when Marian DeCaro underwent an operation for a tumor in 1962, the couple learned that she was once again pregnant. Their only child was born in New York City on November 6 of that year. DeCaro grew up in nearby Little Falls, New Jersey in a household that included his maternal grandmother, who lived in the basement and "ruled the roost." When he was a toddler, his father suffered a heart attack and survived but, DeCaro wrote, "stopped dreaming and lost any semblance of playfulness he ever had." As a result of his father's emotional withdrawal, the boy became especially close to his mother. DeCaro's childhood was a mixture of Catholic Italian-American experience, pop culture, drag Halloween costumes, homophobic gym teachers, and Advanced Placement courses. In A Boy Named Phyllis: A Suburban Memoir (1996) he recounts this mélange with characteristic humor; nevertheless, he also speaks touchingly of the pain of being "different," enduring bullying and slurs from schoolmates, and getting very little support from teachers who could and should have intervened to stop the abuse. -
The 2020 Vice Presidential Debate
The 2020 Vice Presidential Debate THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES The University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE Senator Kamala Harris Vice President Mike Pence The University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah October 7, 2020 THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 after two formal studies recommended the creation of a permanent, independent general election debate sponsor. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, has sponsored all of the presidential debates since 1988. Co-Chairs Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. Dorothy S. Ridings Kenneth Wollack Honorary Co-Chairs Gerald R. Ford* Jimmy Carter Ronald Reagan* George W. Bush Barack Obama Co-Chair Emeritus Paul G. Kirk, Jr. Board of Directors John C. Danforth Antonia Hernandez Charles Gibson Reverend John I. Jenkins John Griffen Newton N. Minow Yvonne Hao Richard D. Parsons Jane Harman Olympia Snowe Executive Director Janet H. Brown Chief of Staff Robin Goldman * Deceased THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES National Sponsors The following national sponsors have generously contributed to the 2020 presidential debates: Anheuser-Busch Companies Judy and Peter Blum Kovler Foundation Crowell & Moring LLP United Airlines, Inc. Pentagram State and Federal Communications, Inc. The Commission on Presidential Debates owes special thanks to: Susan Page Washington Bureau chief, USA Today Dr. Frank Newport Senior Scientist, Gallup National Press Club United States Secret Service Federal Bureau of Investigation Department of Homeland Security The Clemson University Media Forensics Hub THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH The University of Utah is the state’s flagship research institution of higher education and health care. -
Guide to Writing for High School Journalists
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Guide to writing for high school journalists Janet Blank-Libra The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Blank-Libra, Janet, "Guide to writing for high school journalists" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7653. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7653 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th i s is a n unpublished m a n u s c r i p t in w h i c h c o p y r i g h t SUBSISTS. An y f u r t h e r r e p r i n t i n g o f i t s c o n t e n t s m u s t b e APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f i e l d L i b r a r y Un i v e r s i t y o f Mo n t a n a Date :____ 1988_ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. -
Using Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Administration-Press Relations from Clinton Through Trump Joshua Meyer-Gutbrod and John Woolley
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763527 New Conflicts in the Briefing Room: Using Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Administration-press Relations from Clinton through Trump Joshua Meyer-Gutbrod and John Woolley Department of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Journalists have argued that the high levels of hostility between American politics; executive President Trump and numerous media outlets have marked branch; media; presidency a critical juncture in presidential-press relations. This perceived con- flict challenges a key expectation of literatures on political media and the presidency: that functional interdependence will encourage pre- sidential administrations to tolerate more aggressive media question- ing in an effort to control media messages. We examine the interactions between U.S. presidential administrations and the White House press corps through thirty-five years of press briefing transcripts to assess the underpinnings of the current shift. We evaluate key hypotheses via a sentiment analysis using the NRC Emotional Lexicon. Generally, each side tends to reinforce, or mirror, positive and negative language of the counterparty during press briefings. However, we find a significant disjunction with the Trump Administration. Trump Administration representatives use negative language at higher rates than previous administrations and respond more sensitively to changes in press tone by decreasing positive language in response to press negativity. We discuss implications for the dynamic role of the media in shaping these changes. On November 7, 2018, the Trump Administration suspended the White House press pass of CNN Correspondent Jim Acosta, accusing Acosta of shoving a White House aide. Trump himself told Acosta, “You are a rude, terrible person. -
Returning Peer Review to the American Presidential Nomination Process
40675-nyu_93-4 Sheet No. 65 Side A 10/16/2018 09:18:32 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYU\93-4\NYU404.txt unknown Seq: 1 15-OCT-18 11:08 RETURNING PEER REVIEW TO THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION PROCESS ELAINE C. KAMARCK* INTRODUCTION ................................................. 709 R I. THE OLD DAYS: WHEN POLITICIANS NOMINATED OUR LEADERS ................................................ 710 R II. FROM THE NEW PRESIDENTIAL ELITE TO SUPERDELEGATES ....................................... 713 R III. IS IT TIME TO BRING BACK PEER REVIEW? . 719 R IV. PEER REVIEW IN AN AGE OF PRIMARIES? . 722 R A. Option #1: Superdelegates . 724 R B. Option #2: A Pre-Primary Endorsement . 725 R C. Option #3: A Pre-Primary Vote of Confidence . 726 R CONCLUSION ................................................... 727 R INTRODUCTION As Americans, we take for granted that those we entrust with significant authority have been judged by their peers to be competent at the task. Peer review is a concept commonly accepted in most pro- fessions. For instance, in medicine “peer review is defined as ‘the objective evaluation of the quality of a physician’s or a scientist’s per- formance by colleagues.’”1 That is why we license plumbers, electri- cians, manicurists, doctors, nurses, and lawyers. We do this in most 40675-nyu_93-4 Sheet No. 65 Side A 10/16/2018 09:18:32 aspects of life—except politics. In 2016, Americans nominated and then elected Donald Trump, the most unqualified (by virtue of tradi- tional measures of experience and temperament) person ever elected to the Office of the President of the United States, in a system without * Copyright © 2018 by Elaine C.