DOCSLIB.ORG

The Yellowstone Lake Crisis: Confronting a Lake Trout Invasion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Yellowstone Lake Crisis: Confronting a Lake Trout Invasion The Yellowstone Lake Crisis: Confronting a Lake Trout Invasion A Report to the Director of the National Park Service Publicationofthisreportwasfundedin partbygenerousgrantsfromtheTrout andSalmonFoundation,theMontana TroutFoundation,alongwithadditional individualdonationstotheYellowstone FisheryFund. The Yellowstone Lake Crisis: Confronting a Lake Trout Invasion A Report to the Director of the National Park Service Edited by John D. Varley and Paul Schullery Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 1995 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Manypeopleassistedinthepreparationofthis 4,appearsthroughspecialarrangementwiththe report.WeareespeciallygratefultoJack authors,asitisalsobeingpublishedinthe McIntyreforhisassistanceandguidancewith AmericanFisheriesSocietyjournalFisheries. manyaspectsofthematerialpublishedhere,as wellasforhismasterfuldirectionofthelake ReneeEvanoff,NPS,designedthecover,Sarah troutworkshop,whoseresultsaresummarized Broadbent,NPS,designedtherestofthereport. beginningonpage28.YellowstoneParkSu- Additionaleditorialandothersupportwaspro- perintendentMichaelFinley'srecognitionofthe videdbyCarrieGrayandLaurylMack. magnitudeofthiscrisisandhissupportofthe productionofareportofthisscopewerelike- Moregenerally,wethankthemanyotherpeople wiseessential. whohavegiventheirtimegenerouslytohelp withthiscrisis:anglers,rangers,fishingguides, Theworkshop'sarrangementsandlogisticswere ecologists,fisheriesmanagers,andmanymem- managedbyLaurylMack,NPS.Additional bersofthepublicwhohaveshownaspecial workshopsupportwasprovidedbytheU.S.Fish concernoverthissituationandhavegoneoutof andWildlifeServiceFisheryAssistanceOffice theirwaytovolunteerinformationandsupport. inYellowstone,undertheLeadershipofLynn Kaeding,theNPSYellowstoneCenterforRe- Publicationofthisreportwasmadepossibleby sourcesstaff,especiallySueConsoloMurphy agrantfromtheMontanaTroutFoundation. andStuColeman,andNPSResourceManage- Additionalfundswereprovidedbymanyindi- mentOperationsCoordinatorTomOlliffandRe- vidualdonationstotheYellowstoneFishery sourceManagementCoordinatorDanReinhart. FundoftheYellowstoneAssociation. ThereportbyKaedingetal.,beginningonpage Cover design by Renee Evanoff. Trout paintings by Michael Simon TABLEOFCONTENTS TheLakeYellowstoneTroutCrisisExecutiveSummary ................................................................... 2 LakeTroutDiscoveredinYellowstoneLake ................................................................................. 4 byLynnR.Kaeding,GlennD.Boltz,andDanielG.Carty Editors'sNote:UpdateonlaketroutsituationthroughJune,1996 ..................................................... 11 CutthroatTroutandtheYellowstoneLakeEcosystem .................................................................... 12 byPaulSchulleryandJohnD.Varley SocioeconomicValuesAssociatedwiththeYellowstoneLakeCutthroatTrout ....................................... 22 byJohnD.VarleyandPaulSchullery ReviewandAssessmentofPossibilitiesforProtectingtheCutthroatTrout ........................................... 28 ofYellowstoneLakeFromIntroducedLakeTrout Proceedingsofaworkshopandinformationexchangeheldin Gardiner,Montana,February15-17,1995 byJohnD.McIntyre,WorkshopLeader ADraftPlanofActionforControllingExpansionoftheLakeTroutPopulationinYellowstoneLake .......... 34 byTomOlliff AuthorsandWorkshopParticipants .......................................................................................... 36 THE LAKE YELLOWSTONE TROUT CRISIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yellowstone Lake is home of the premier surviving inland cutthroat trout fishery in North America. This fishery is threatened with destruction by illegally introduced lake trout, which were discovered in 1994. The lake trout are known to exist in at least four and possibly as many as six age groups, proof of a relatively small but reproducing population (Fig. 1). The older age groups are now able to reproduce, and the lake trout population will almost certainly grow rapidly. Fig. 1. Three age classes of lake trout captured at various The discovery of these non-native lake trout in times in Yellowstone Lake in 1994, indicating ongoing Yellowstone Lake caused great alarm among reproduction in the introduced lake trout population. U.S. fisheries biologists throughout the greater Fish and Wildlife Service photo. Yellowstone area because of the lake trout’s reputation for displacing species such as implications for the continued viability of the cutthroat trout in other western lakes. Park Yellowstone cutthroat trout as a subspecies. administrators sought to verify the “doomsday” opinion of local biologists by arranging an The predicted decline of Yellowstone cutthroat assessment of the situation by United States and trout will destroy the world-famous fisheries in Canadian specialists in population dynamics the lake and its tributaries, including the storied and lake trout biology. The experts convened an fishery in the Yellowstone River between the information-sharing workshop in February lake and the Upper Falls; this latter fishery 1995, and concluded that the lake trout gained international prominence in the 1970s as population in Yellowstone Lake is likely to the site of pioneering advances in catch-and- expand and cause precipitous decline in the release fishing, and remains one of the world's cutthroat trout population. The majority view premier destinations for trout fishermen. For was that the cutthroat trout are likely to decline nearly 150 years, the lake itself has developed to 10-20% of present abundance. These its own superlative reputation as a “trout percentages translate to a decline from an catchery.” Though a lake trout fishery will estimated 2.5 million trout of catchable size at evolve in the lake consonant with the cutthroat present to 250,000-500,000 at some time in the decline, it will be a highly specialized fishery of foreseeable future. interest only to a comparatively few anglers and will not occur at all on the rivers and streams. Except for its strongholds in the upper The replacement fishery will in no respect Yellowstone River area, the Yellowstone (ecologically, economically, or socially) re- cutthroat trout is imperiled. Human activities place the fisheries it destroys. have already reduced its range to 15% of its historic distribution. The appearance of lake The cutthroat trout decline will also cause trout in Yellowstone Lake has ominous severe disruption in the food supply for two The Yellowstone Lake Crisis 3 species listed under the Endangered Species resources and personnel needed to implement Act—the threatened grizzly bear and the and maintain these emergency measures. There endangered bald eagle—and will likewise was a consensus view among the workshop affect many species of special concern, biologists that only an aggressive lake trout including the white pelican, otter, black bear, control program would protect the cutthroat mink, osprey, and loon; an estimated 42 species population and thus the ecological character of of mammals and birds in all. Grizzly bear, white the entire Yellowstone Lake basin. pelican, and osprey abundance at Yellowstone Lake, and perhaps other species as well, are all While the potential ecological losses are correlated with the abundance of Yellowstone staggering, the potential economic losses can be Lake cutthroat trout. Because of pronounced summarized as equally immense. The 1994 differences in the habits and habitat uses of lake value of the Yellowstone fisheries above the trout and cutthroat trout, the lake trout will not great falls, including the lake and its tributaries, serve as a replacement food source for these is estimated at slightly more than $36 million. affected species of mammals and birds. The cumulative 30-year value of the cutthroat trout sport fishery, assuming lake trout were In reviewing current fishery technologies, absent, is estimated at more than a billion workshop participants concluded that there is dollars ($1,080,000,000). Assuming lake trout little prospect that the lake trout can be are vigorously controlled, the consonant value eradicated from Yellowstone Lake. However, declines to $685 million. If lake trout are not scientists from the Great Lakes region offered controlled, the value declines to $439,950,000. some hope that expansion of the lake trout The last value represents a three-decade population might be contained through an economic loss of $640 million, which can be aggressive gill-netting program such as those considered the net economic effect of the illegal used by commercial fishing operations in the lake trout introduction if no actions are taken to Great Lakes. Following that lead, personnel control the species. from the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Fishery Assistance With lake trout control, at an estimated program Office at the park developed an action plan to cost of $9 million over 30 years, the effects of initiate a control program. The program’s lake trout on the cutthroat trout population have effectiveness depends on an understanding of a high probability of being ameliorated. The where the lake trout populations are located in benefit-to-cost ratio for the lake trout control each season so that they can be netted without program is a favorable 27:1. harming the cutthroat trout population. If the effects of lake trout on cutthroat trout are Initial efforts will proceed based on knowledge greater than projected by the experts, and the that in the summer the lake trout generally Yellowstone cutthroat trout becomes rare or inhabit deeper
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the National Park Service Open- File
    Form 9-014 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING, MONTANA, AND IDAHO by Edward R. Cox Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open- file report February 1973 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16 08863-3 831-564 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey Water resources of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho by Edward R. Cox Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open* file report 73" February 1973 -1- Contents Iage Abstract ....... .... ................................... 9 Introduction-- - ....... ........ .................. n Location and extent of the area 12 Topography and drainage* -- - - - . --. -- .--..-- 13 Climate - - ................ 16 Previous investigations- -- .......................... 20 Methods of investigation . 21 Well and station numbers- ..... .... ........... .... 24 Acknowledgments---------------- - - 25 Geology-- - .............. ....... ......... ....... 26 Geologic units and their water-bearing characteristics 26 Precambrian rocks------------ -- - - -- 31 Paleozoic rocks ------- .. .--. -.- 31 Mesozoic rocks-- ,........--....-....---..-..---- .- 35 Cenozoic rocks- ....... ............................ 36 Tertiary rocks-- ........... ............... - 36 Tertiary and Quaternary rocks-- -- - - 38 Rhyolite - ............ 38 Basalt--- - ....................... .... 42 Quaternary rocks- - ...-. .-..-... ........ 44 Glacial deposits---- - .-- - 44 Lacustrine deposits---- - - 47 Hot-springs
    [Show full text]
  • Bonneville Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarki Utah) Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Is One of Three Cutthroat Trout Subspecies Native to Utah
    FISH Bonneville Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah) Bonneville cutthroat trout is one of three cutthroat trout subspecies native to Utah. Bonneville cutthroat trout historically occurred in the Pleistocene Lake Bonneville basin, which included portions of Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming (Kershner 1995). The desiccation of Lake Bonneville into the smaller Great Salt Lake and fragmentation of other stream and lake habitats may have led to three slightly differentiated groups of Bonneville cutthroat trout. These groups are found in the Bonneville basin proper, the Bear River drainage, and the Snake Valley (Behnke 1992). There are five known populations of pure strain Bonneville cutthroat trout on the Fishlake National Forest inhabiting approximately 38 miles of stream habitat. There are several recently reintroduced populations, and several small potential remnant populations. Habitat for the Bonneville cutthroat trout is widely distributed and variable. It ranges from high elevation (3,500 m mean sea level) streams with coniferous and deciduous riparian trees to low elevation (1,000 m mean sea level) streams in sage-steppe grasslands containing herbaceous riparian zones. As such, Bonneville cutthroat trout have adapted to a broad spectrum of habitat conditions throughout their range (Kershner 1995). Sexual maturity is typically reached during the second year for males and the third year for females (May et al. 1978). Both the age at maturity and the annual timing of spawning vary geographically with elevation, temperature, and life history strategy. Lake resident trout may begin spawning at two years of age and usually continue throughout their lives, while adfluvial individuals may not spawn for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Twin Lakes Reservoirs
    Twin Lakes Reservoirs FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Michael Atwood - Aquatic Biologist (Salida) [email protected] / 719-530-5525 General Information: Twin Lakes Reservoirs have a combined surface area of 2700 acres. They offer good fishing for brown, rainbow, and cutthroat trout with trophy lake trout potential. The reservoir has ex- cellent amenities and is nestled at the base of Mt. Elbert and the Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Area. To view map go to http://maps.google.com/maps Location: Chaffee County. Located at the mouth of Lake Creek northwest of Granite, Colorado. Recreational Management: Colorado Parks and Wildlife (719-530-5520) and USFS (719-486-0749). Fishery Management: Coldwater angling for brown, rainbow, cutthroat and lake trout. Detailed Fishery Information: See additional pages. Amenities and General Info. Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes Boat Ramps (2) 2019 Rainbow/Cutthroat Trout Picnic Areas (1) Campgrounds (3) Rainbow Trout Trout action has picked up in Restrooms at most sites Brown Trout recent years. They average Trail around most of lake 13 inches with fish up to 20 Abundant fishing access 2018 inches taken. Catchables (10+ inch) are stocked from Regulations Rainbow Trout June through September. Cutbow Trout The bag and possession Lake Trout limit for lake trout is 1. 2017 Lake trout 22-34 inches Lake trout average 19 inches long must be returned to the Rainbow Trout with fish in the 40 inch class water immediately. Cutbow Trout becoming more abundant. Statewide bag and posses- Lake Trout Some of the best action can sion limits apply for other 2016 be found casting large Ra- species (see CPW Fishery pallas at ice-out near the hy- Brochure).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in Spring Creek, Utah
    Spring Creek Population History of the Pyramid Lake Rediscovery (Again) Unfortunately, given its small size, the trout Lahontan Cutthroat population at Spring Creek has a very low In October 2009, a team from Weber State probability of survival. It lacks the numbers The Lahontan cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus University in conjunction with personnel and space necessary to maintain sufficient clarkii henshawi, is native to the Lahontan Basin from the DWR identified several specimens genetic diversity. It is believed that for a on the border between California and Nevada. believed to be of a pure or hybrid strain of mountain stream cutthroat population to For thousands of years it thrived and played the Pyramid Lake Lahontan cutthroat trout survive it must have a minimum of 3.3 km an important economic and cultural role in Spring Creek in Uintah, Utah. Using of habitat and an abundance in the area of among the Native American tribes of the electrofishers and dip nets, a 600 m stretch 0.3 fish per meter.3 Based on our region. The largest strain of this fish of the stream was sampled. A maximum observations, the Spring Creek population originated in Pyramid Lake, in western of 16 different individuals was collected in A Unique Environment has a maximum abundance of 0.1 fish/m Nevada and has reached recorded weights of two sampling trips. The fish appeared to Spring Creek’s unique vegetation and only 200 m of habitat. However, against up to 41 pounds, making it the largest “The Fish that Won’t Die” be restricted to a 200 m stretch.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Trout Management Plan
    LAKE TROUT MANAGEMENT PLAN DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND HATCHERIES PREPARED BY PAUL JOHNSON REGIONAL FISHERIES BIOLOGIST REGION E MARCH 2001 LAKE TROUT LIFE HISTORY Description The lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) lacks the distinctive coloration of its close relative, the eastern brook trout. Lake trout are usually either dark green or grayish brown in color, with white or pale yellow bean-shaped spots. In clear waters lake trout are often so silvery that the white spots are difficult to see. In stained waters they are very dark, almost black. Generally, a narrow border of white is present along the anterior margins of the pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins. This is most pronounced during spawning; however, at no time is this border as accentuated as it is on the fins of the brook trout. Lake trout fins are not orange or orange-red, like those of the brook trout. Distribution Lake trout are distributed throughout Canada. In the United States their natural range was restricted to northern New England, the Great Lakes, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, and Alaska. In Maine they were originally found in about 100 lakes throughout the State. However, lake trout have been successfully reared in hatcheries. Consequently, their range has been extended considerably in the United States. In Maine they have been introduced into waters from Aroostook County in the north, to York County in the south. Throughout their native range lake trout are known by a wide variety of common names. In Maine they are called togue, whereas in other parts of the country and Canada they are referred to as mackinaw, salmon trout, lakers, grey trout, namaycush, Great Falls char, or mountain trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Related to Adoption of Subsurface Gillnetting to Reduce Bycatch in Pakistan
    ___________________________________________IOTC-2019-WPEB15-48 Issues related to adoption of subsurface gillnetting to reduce bycatch in Pakistan Muhammad Moazzam WWF-Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan ([email protected]) and Muhammad Farhan Khan Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan ([email protected]) and Abstract Gillnet is a popular fishing method used for catching tuna and tuna like fishes especially by small scale fisheries of coastal states of the Indian Ocean. However, gillnets are known for extremely high bycatch which includes not only commercially important fish species but also a large number of non-target endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species. Information about gillnet bycatch is not well known from major coastal states, however, studies initiated by WWF-Pakistan provide comprehensive information about bycatch of gillnet fisheries of Pakistan. It is estimated that more than 12,000 cetaceans and 29,000 sea turtles used to be annually entangled in the gillnet fisheries of Pakistan alone. Their numbers may be equally higher in other countries of the northern Arabian Sea where a large gillnet fleet is based. Considering high bycatch of ETP species, WWF-Pakistan introduced subsurface gillnetting in Pakistan as a mean for reducing entanglement and mortality of at least cetaceans and turtles. Placing gillnet below 2 m proved to a success, as catches of target species of gillnet fisheries including yellowfin, longtail and skipjack tunas increased substantially whereas catches of some important species such as billfish and dolphinfish substantially decreased. However, high catches of target species i.e. yellowfin, longtail and skipjack tunas compensates for the losses incurred due to decreased catches of these two species group.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Conservation
    Yellowstone SScience Native Fish Conservation @ JOSH UDESEN Native Trout on the Rise he waters of Yellowstone National Park are among the most pristine on Earth. Here at the headwaters of the Missouri and Snake rivers, the park’s incredibly productive streams and lakes support an abundance of fish. Following the last Tglacial period 8,000-10,000 years ago, 12 species/subspecies of fish recolonized the park. These fish, including the iconic cutthroat trout, adapted and evolved to become specialists in the Yellowstone environment, underpinning a natural food web that includes magnificent animals: ospreys, bald eagles, river otters, black bears, and grizzly bears all feed upon cutthroat trout. When the park was established in 1872, early naturalists noted that about half of the waters were fishless, mostly because of waterfalls which precluded upstream movement of recolonizing fishes. Later, during a period of increasing popularity of the Yellowstone sport fishery, the newly established U.S. Fish Commission began to extensively stock the park’s waters with non-natives, including brown, brook, rainbow, and lake trout. Done more than a century ago as an attempt to increase an- gling opportunities, these actions had unintended consequences. Non-native fish caused serious negative impacts on native fish populations in some watersheds, and altered the parks natural ecology, particularly at Yellowstone Lake. It took a great deal of effort over many decades to alter our native fisheries. It will take a great deal more work to restore them. As Aldo Leopold once said, “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Lakes Guide: Absaroka, Beartooth & Crazies
    2021 MOUNTAIN LAKES GUIDE Silver Lake ABSAROKA - BEARTOOTH & CRAZY MOUNTAINS Fellow Angler: This booklet is intended to pass on information collected over many years about the fishery of the Absaroka-Beartooth high country lakes. Since Pat Marcuson began surveying these lakes in 1967, many individuals have hefted a heavy pack and worked the high country for Fish, Wildlife and Parks. They have brought back the raw data and personal observations necessary to formulate management schemes for the 300+ lakes in this area containing fish. While the information presented here is not intended as a guide for hiking/camping or fishing techniques, it should help wilderness users to better plan their trips according to individual preferences and abilities. Fish species present in the Absaroka-Beartooth lakes include Yellowstone cutthroat trout, brook trout, rainbow trout, golden trout, arctic grayling, and variations of cutthroat/rainbow/golden trout hybrids. These lake fisheries generally fall into two categories: self-sustaining and stocked. Self-sustaining lakes have enough spawning habitat to allow fish to restock themselves year after year. These often contain so many fish that while fishing can be fast, the average fish size will be small. The average size and number of fish present change very little from year to year in most of these lakes. Lakes without spawning potential must be planted regularly to sustain a fishery. Standard stocking in the Beartooths is 50-100 Yellowstone cutthroat trout fingerlings per acre every eight years. Special situations may call for different species, numbers, or frequency of plants. For instance, lakes with heavy fishing pressure tend to be stocked more often and at higher densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Piscivorous Birds of Yellowstone Lake: Their History, Ecology, and Status
    Piscivorous Birds of Yellowstone Lake: Their History, Ecology, and Status Terry McEneaney Yellowstone Lake is truly one of the most recognizable geographic features of the Greater Yellowstone area, and, most importantly, the ecological nucleus for native fishes and piscivorous birds in Yellowstone National Park. It is home to the only current nesting colony of American white pelican (Pelecanus erythrorhyn - chos) in the National Park System. It is also unique for having the highest-eleva- tion nesting records in North America for colonial nesting birds such as the American white pelican, double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritis), California gull (Larus californicus), common loon (Gavia immer), and Caspian tern (Sterna caspia). In excess of 50% of Yellowstone’s bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and osprey (Pandion haliaetus) nesting pairs are currently asso- ciated with Yellowstone Lake and its piscine prey. The magnetism of this unique area for birdlife rests on its remoteness, inaccessibility, and abundant food resources. Only two native fishes are found in Yellowstone Lake: the Yellowstone cutthroat trout ( O n c o r h y n chus clarki bouvieri) and the longnose dace (Catostomus catostomus). But it is the cutthroat trout biomass that is the main attraction for the piscivorous birds of Yellowstone Lake. The piscivorous birds and the cutthroat trout of Yellowstone Lake have under- gone a kaleidoscope of management practices, public attitudes, philosophical differences, exotic introductions, population changes, and distributional shifts. This paper will intertwine these points while examining the history, ecology, and status of the piscivorous avifauna of Yellowstone Lake. History The history, ecology, and status of the piscivorous birds of Yellowstone Lake is best understood by reviewing three important timelines: those of the park itself, of fish management in the park, and of bird management in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Evaluation of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Cockrell, Laura Elizabeth, "Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park" (2014). Online Theses and Dissertations. 222. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/222 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK By Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Bachelor of Science California State University, Chico Chico, California 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 Copyright © Laura Elizabeth Cockrell, 2014 All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends for their unwavering support during this adventure. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible through funding from the Yellowstone Park Foundation and the Society of Wetland Scientists Student Research Grant for support of field work, and by a Graduate Assistantship and Research Assistantship from the Department of Biological Sciences at Eastern Kentucky University. Thank you to Dr. Bob Frederick for his insight and persistence and for providing the GIS lab and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout
    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Existing Populations Lahontan cutthroat trout populations in the Coyote Lakes basin are remnant of a larger population inhabiting pluvial Lake Lahontan during the Pleistocene era. Hydrologic access routes of founding cutthroat trout from Lake Lahontan basin into the Coyote Lakes basin have yet to be described (Coffin and Cowan 1995). The Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU is comprised of five populations (Table 1). All populations express a resident life history strategy; however large individuals in the Willow and Whitehorse Complex populations suggest a migratory component may exist. Table 1. Populations, existence status, and life history of the Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU. Exist Population Description Life History Yes Willow Willow Creek and tributaries. Resident / Migratory Yes Whitehorse Complex Whitehorse and Little Whitehorse Creeks, and Resident / Migratory tributaries. Yes Doolittle Doolittle Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Cottonwood Cottonwood Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Antelope Antelope Creek. Resident Lahontan cutthroat trout from Willow and Whitehorse creeks were transplanted into Cottonwood Creek in 1971 and 1980, and into Antelope Creek in 1972 (Hanson et al. 1993). Whether Lahontan cutthroat trout were present in these creeks prior to stocking activities is disputed (Behnke 1992, Hanson et al. 1993, Coffin and Cowan 1995, K. Jones, ODFW Research Biologist, Corvallis, OR personal communication). For the purpose of this review these populations are considered native. Lahontan cutthroat trout were also transplanted into Fifteenmile Creek above a natural barrier (Hanson et al. 1993), but they did not establish a self- sustaining population (ODFW Aquatic Inventory Project, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]