DOCSLIB.ORG

The Schrödinger Equation in Three Dimensions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Schrödinger Equation in Three Dimensions The Schrödinger Equation in Three Dimensions Particle in a Rigid Three-Dimensional Box (Cartesian Coordinates) To illustrate the solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) in three dimensions, we start with the simple problem of a particle in a rigid box. This is the three- dimensional version of the problem of the particle in a one-dimensional, rigid box. In one dimension, the TISE is written as 2 d 2ψ (x) − +U (x)ψ (x) = Eψ (x). (1) 2m dx2 In three dimensions, the wave function will in general be a z function of the three spatial coordinates. In the Cartesian y coordinate system, these coordinates are x, y, and z. Also, the potential energy U will in general be a function of all 3 x 2 d 2ψ coordinates. Now, in the 1-D TISE, the term − Lz 2m dx2 Lx 2 2 2 px kx can be identified with the kinetic energy = of the Ly 2m 2m 2 d 2ψ particle because − = [E −U ]ψ. [Try, for example, the free-particle wave function 2m dx2 ψ = Aei(kx−ωt).] 2 2 2 In three dimensions, the KE is(px + py + pz ) / 2m , so we suspect that additional second derivative terms will be needed to represent the additional kinetic energy terms. In fact, the TISE in three dimensions is written as 2 ⎛ ∂2ψ (x, y, z) ∂2ψ (x, y, z) ∂2ψ (x, y, z) ⎞ − ⎜ 2 + 2 + 2 ⎟ +U (x, y, z)ψ (x, y, z) = Eψ (x, y, z). (2) 2m ⎝ ∂x ∂y ∂z ⎠ ∂ψ (x, y,z) The symbol represents the partial derivative of ψ (x, y,z) with respect to x, which is ∂x simply the derivative of ψ (x, y,z) with respect to x with y and z held constant. Thus, ∂ψ ifψ = x2 yz, then = 2xyz . ∂x In the particle in a box problem, U(x, y, z) = 0 inside the box and U = ∞ at the walls.1 So, inside the box, the TISE becomes 2 ⎛ ∂2ψ ∂2ψ ∂2ψ ⎞ − ⎜ 2 + 2 + 2 ⎟ = Eψ. (3) 2m ⎝ ∂x ∂y ∂z ⎠ 1 Inside the box, 0<x<Lx, 0<y<Ly, and 0<z<Lz. (See figure of box above.) 1 To solve partial differential equations (the TISE in 3D is an example of these equations), one can employ the method of separation of variables. We write ψ (x, y,z) = X(x)Y (y)Z(z), (4) where X is a function of x only, Y is a function of y only, and Z is a function of z only. Substituting for ψ in Eq. (3) yields 2 ⎡ d 2 X d 2Y d 2Z ⎤ Y (y)Z(z) X (x)Y (z) X (x)Y (y) EX (x)Y (y)Z(z). (5) − ⎢ 2 + 2 + 2 ⎥ = 2m ⎣ dx dy dz ⎦ Note that the partial derivatives have disappeared, since X, Y, and Z are functions of one variable 2 only. Dividing both sides by − X (x)Y (y)Z(z) yields 2m ⎡ 1 d 2 X 1 d 2Y 1 d 2Z ⎤ 2mE . (6) ⎢ 2 + 2 + 2 ⎥ = − 2 ⎣ X dx Y dy Z dz ⎦ For a given solution, E is a constant. Further, note that the first term in the square brackets is a function of x only, the second term is a function of y only, and the third term is a function of z only. For Eq. (6) to be valid for all values of x, y, and z, each of the three terms must be constant. If this were not true, and, for example, all the terms were variable, then if one held y and z constant and changed x, the sum on the left hand side of the equation would change, violating the equation. Eq. (6) therefore becomes three separated ordinary differential equations: 1 d 2 X = −k 2 , (7) X dx2 x 1 d 2Y = −k 2 , (8) Y dy2 y and 1 d 2Z = −k 2 , (9) Z dz2 z with 2 2 2 2mE kx + ky + kz = . (10) 2 2 2 2 The separation constants are written as −k x , −k y , and −k z in analogy with the 1-D particle in a box problem. Eqs. (7), (8), and (9) are identical to the equation obtained in the 1-D problem and the boundary conditions are the same. For example, X(x) = 0 at x = 0 and x = Lx since the wave functions cannot penetrate the wall. The boundary condition at x = 0 leads to X(x) = A1sin kxx. nxπ The boundary condition at x = Lx leads to kx = , where nx = 1, 2,… Similar solutions are Lx obtained for Y(y) and Z(z). Hence, we find that 2 ⎛ nxπ x⎞ ⎛ nyπ y⎞ ⎛ nzπz⎞ ψ (x, y,z) = Asin⎜ ⎟ sin⎜ ⎟ sin⎜ ⎟ , (11) ⎝ Lx ⎠ ⎝ Ly ⎠ ⎝ Lz ⎠ and from Eq. (10), we find the energy 2 2 2 2 ⎡ 2 ⎤ π ⎛ nx ⎞ ⎛ ny ⎞ ⎛ nz ⎞ E = ⎢⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥. (12) 2m ⎢ L ⎜ L ⎟ L ⎥ ⎣⎝ x ⎠ ⎝ y ⎠ ⎝ z ⎠ ⎦ The integers nx, ny, and nz are called quantum numbers. These quantum numbers specify the quantum states of the system. Thus, we can label the wave functions and energies according to the values of the quantum numbers: ; E . ψ nx ny nz nx ny nz The ground state energy is 2 2 2 2π 2 ⎡⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎤ E111 = ⎢⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥. (13) 2m ⎢ L ⎜ L ⎟ L ⎥ ⎣⎝ x ⎠ ⎝ y ⎠ ⎝ z ⎠ ⎦ If the box is a cube, then Lx = Ly = Lz = L, and the energy becomes 2 2 π 2 2 2 E = n +n +n . (14) nxnynz 2mL2 ( x y z ) 32π 2 The ground state energy is then E = . 111 2mL2 Degeneracy For the next higher energy level up from the ground state, there are 3 distinct wave functions or quantum states of the cubical box that have this energy:ψ 211, ψ 121, ψ 112 . These quantum states are distinct because their probability densities are different. (E.g., 2 2 2 ⎛ 2π x⎞ 2 ⎛ π y⎞ 2 ⎛ πz⎞ ψ = A sin sin sin ≠ 211 ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ 2 2 2 ⎛ π x⎞ 2 ⎛ 2π y⎞ 2 ⎛ πz⎞ 2 A sin sin sin = ψ .) The occurrence of more than one distinct ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ ⎝⎜ L ⎠⎟ 121 quantum states (wave functions) with the same energy is called degeneracy. In the case of the particle in a rigid, cubical box, the next-lowest energy level is three-fold degenerate. 32π 2 E = E = E = . (15) 211 121 112 mL2 . Note that the ground state is non-degenerate. Further, the three-fold degeneracy of the first- excited state is removed if Lx ≠ Ly ≠ Lz . Degeneracy is intimately connected to symmetry: the 3 greater the symmetry of the system, the higher the degeneracy of the quantum states. [See www.falstad.com for simulations.] Contour Maps Contours represent lines of equal probability density. See the contour maps for the 2-D rigid box in the Taylor et al. textbook. The Three Dimensional Central-Force Problem Ultimately, our aim is to solve the TISE for an atomic system. The simplest atomic system is a one-electron atom in which a single electron is bound to the nucleus. In this case, the potential energy kZe2 U(x, y,z) = U(r) = − . (16) r The potential energy is a function of only the radial distance –e r. The corresponding force is directed along – r . Such a force (in this case, the electrostatic force) is called a central force. +Ze Note that U is spherically symmetric since it depends only on r. Thus, classically, in a one-electron atomic system in which no external forces act, one does not expect the energy E to depend on the angular position of the electron, only on the radial distance from the nucleus. Because of the spherical symmetry, the solution to the TISE is tractable if we use spherical polar coordinates rather than Cartesian coordinates. In the spherical coordinate system, the coordinates are r, θ, andφ , where r is the radial distance, θ is the polar angle, and φ is the azimuthal angle. For a spherically symmetric potential energy z U(r), the TISE cannot be solved using P separation of variables in Cartesian coordinates. In spherical coordinates, however, the TISE is r separable, and this is the solution we shall z = r cosθ θ study. It turns out that even though the TISE is y separable in spherical coordinates, the solution is complicated and we shall not go into all the φ mathematical details of the solution. Rather, we x = r cosθ cosφ shall concentrate on the physics. x y = r cosθ sin φ In spherical coordinates, the TISE for a spherically symmetric potential is given by 2 ⎛ 1 ∂2 1 ∂ ∂ψ 1 ∂2ψ ⎞ (r ) ⎛sin ⎞ U (r) E , (17) − ⎜ 2 ψ + 2 ⎜ θ ⎟ + 2 2 2 ⎟ + ψ = ψ 2µ ⎝ r ∂r r sinθ ∂θ ⎝ ∂θ ⎠ r sin θ ∂φ ⎠ 4 where ψ ≡ ψ (r,θ,φ)and the mass is taken to be the reduced mass µ . [Recall that this accounts for the slight motion of the nucleus.] Using separation of variables, we seek a solution of the form ψ (r,θ,φ) = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ). (18) Substituting in the TISE and separating yields 1 d 2Φ = −m2 , (19) Φ dφ 2 l 2 1 d ⎛ dΘ⎞ ⎡ ml ⎤ (20) ⎜ sinθ ⎟ + ⎢l(l + 1) − 2 ⎥Θ = 0, sinθ dθ ⎝ dθ ⎠ ⎣ sin θ ⎦ and d 2 2µ ⎡ l(l +1)2 ⎤ (rR) U (r) E rR 0, (21) 2 − 2 ⎢ + 2 − ⎥ = dr ⎣ 2µr ⎦ 2 where in Eq. (19), the separation constant is −m and in Eq. (20), the separation constant is l(l + 1) . Note that neither the θ nor the φ equation contains U(r).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 1 Old Quantum Theory
    UNIT 1 OLD QUANTUM THEORY Structure Introduction Objectives li;,:overy of Sub-atomic Particles Earlier Atom Models Light as clectromagnetic Wave Failures of Classical Physics Black Body Radiation '1 Heat Capacity Variation Photoelectric Effect Atomic Spectra Planck's Quantum Theory, Black Body ~diation. and Heat Capacity Variation Einstein's Theory of Photoelectric Effect Bohr Atom Model Calculation of Radius of Orbits Energy of an Electron in an Orbit Atomic Spectra and Bohr's Theory Critical Analysis of Bohr's Theory Refinements in the Atomic Spectra The61-y Summary Terminal Questions Answers 1.1 INTRODUCTION The ideas of classical mechanics developed by Galileo, Kepler and Newton, when applied to atomic and molecular systems were found to be inadequate. Need was felt for a theory to describe, correlate and predict the behaviour of the sub-atomic particles. The quantum theory, proposed by Max Planck and applied by Einstein and Bohr to explain different aspects of behaviour of matter, is an important milestone in the formulation of the modern concept of atom. In this unit, we will study how black body radiation, heat capacity variation, photoelectric effect and atomic spectra of hydrogen can be explained on the basis of theories proposed by Max Planck, Einstein and Bohr. They based their theories on the postulate that all interactions between matter and radiation occur in terms of definite packets of energy, known as quanta. Their ideas, when extended further, led to the evolution of wave mechanics, which shows the dual nature of matter
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom
    Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom Chemistry 35 Fall 2000 Balmer and the Hydrogen Spectrum n 1885: Johann Balmer, a Swiss schoolteacher, empirically deduced a formula which predicted the wavelengths of emission for Hydrogen: l (in Å) = 3645.6 x n2 for n = 3, 4, 5, 6 n2 -4 •Predicts the wavelengths of the 4 visible emission lines from Hydrogen (which are called the Balmer Series) •Implies that there is some underlying order in the atom that results in this deceptively simple equation. 2 1 The Bohr Atom n 1913: Niels Bohr uses quantum theory to explain the origin of the line spectrum of hydrogen 1. The electron in a hydrogen atom can exist only in discrete orbits 2. The orbits are circular paths about the nucleus at varying radii 3. Each orbit corresponds to a particular energy 4. Orbit energies increase with increasing radii 5. The lowest energy orbit is called the ground state 6. After absorbing energy, the e- jumps to a higher energy orbit (an excited state) 7. When the e- drops down to a lower energy orbit, the energy lost can be given off as a quantum of light 8. The energy of the photon emitted is equal to the difference in energies of the two orbits involved 3 Mohr Bohr n Mathematically, Bohr equated the two forces acting on the orbiting electron: coulombic attraction = centrifugal accelleration 2 2 2 -(Z/4peo)(e /r ) = m(v /r) n Rearranging and making the wild assumption: mvr = n(h/2p) n e- angular momentum can only have certain quantified values in whole multiples of h/2p 4 2 Hydrogen Energy Levels n Based on this model, Bohr arrived at a simple equation to calculate the electron energy levels in hydrogen: 2 En = -RH(1/n ) for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, .
    [Show full text]
  • Configuration Interaction Study of the Ground State of the Carbon Atom
    Configuration Interaction Study of the Ground State of the Carbon Atom María Belén Ruiz* and Robert Tröger Department of Theoretical Chemistry Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg Egerlandstraße 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany In print in Advances Quantum Chemistry Vol. 76: Novel Electronic Structure Theory: General Innovations and Strongly Correlated Systems 30th July 2017 Abstract Configuration Interaction (CI) calculations on the ground state of the C atom are carried out using a small basis set of Slater orbitals [7s6p5d4f3g]. The configurations are selected according to their contribution to the total energy. One set of exponents is optimized for the whole expansion. Using some computational techniques to increase efficiency, our computer program is able to perform partially-parallelized runs of 1000 configuration term functions within a few minutes. With the optimized computer programme we were able to test a large number of configuration types and chose the most important ones. The energy of the 3P ground state of carbon atom with a wave function of angular momentum L=1 and ML=0 and spin eigenfunction with S=1 and MS=0 leads to -37.83526523 h, which is millihartree accurate. We discuss the state of the art in the determination of the ground state of the carbon atom and give an outlook about the complex spectra of this atom and its low-lying states. Keywords: Carbon atom; Configuration Interaction; Slater orbitals; Ground state *Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction The spectrum of the isolated carbon atom is the most complex one among the light atoms. The ground state of carbon atom is a triplet 3P state and its low-lying excited states are singlet 1D, 1S and 1P states, more stable than the corresponding triplet excited ones 3D and 3S, against the Hund’s rule of maximal multiplicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Degenerate Eigenvalue Problem 32.1 Degenerate Perturbation
    Physics 342 Lecture 32 Degenerate Eigenvalue Problem Lecture 32 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 We have the matrix form of the first order perturbative result from last time. This carries over pretty directly to the Schr¨odingerequation, with only minimal replacement (the inner product and finite vector space change, but notationally, the results are identical). Because there are a variety of quantum mechanical systems with degenerate spectra (like the Hydrogen 2 eigenstates, each En has n associated eigenstates) and we want to be able to predict the energy shift associated with perturbations in these systems, we can copy our arguments for matrices to cover matrices with more than one eigenvector per eigenvalue. The punch line of that program is that we can use the non-degenerate perturbed energies, provided we start with the \correct" degenerate linear combinations. 32.1 Degenerate Perturbation N×N Going back to our symmetric matrix example, we have A IR , and 2 again, a set of eigenvectors and eigenvalues: A xi = λi xi. This time, suppose that the eigenvalue λi has a set of M associated eigenvectors { that is, suppose a set of eigenvectors yj satisfy: A yj = λi yj j = 1 M (32.1) −! 1 of 9 32.1. DEGENERATE PERTURBATION Lecture 32 (so this represents M separate equations) that are themselves orthonormal1. Clearly, any linear combination of these vectors is also an eigenvector: M M X X A βk yk = λi βk yk: (32.2) k=1 k=1 M PM Define the general combination of yi to be z βk yk, also an f gi=1 ≡ k=1 eigenvector of A with eigenvalue λi.
    [Show full text]
  • Vibrational Quantum Number
    Fundamentals in Biophotonics Quantum nature of atoms, molecules – matter Aleksandra Radenovic [email protected] EPFL – Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Bioengineering Institute IBI 26. 03. 2018. Quantum numbers •The four quantum numbers-are discrete sets of integers or half- integers. –n: Principal quantum number-The first describes the electron shell, or energy level, of an atom –ℓ : Orbital angular momentum quantum number-as the angular quantum number or orbital quantum number) describes the subshell, and gives the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum through the relation Ll2 ( 1) –mℓ:Magnetic (azimuthal) quantum number (refers, to the direction of the angular momentum vector. The magnetic quantum number m does not affect the electron's energy, but it does affect the probability cloud)- magnetic quantum number determines the energy shift of an atomic orbital due to an external magnetic field-Zeeman effect -s spin- intrinsic angular momentum Spin "up" and "down" allows two electrons for each set of spatial quantum numbers. The restrictions for the quantum numbers: – n = 1, 2, 3, 4, . – ℓ = 0, 1, 2, 3, . , n − 1 – mℓ = − ℓ, − ℓ + 1, . , 0, 1, . , ℓ − 1, ℓ – –Equivalently: n > 0 The energy levels are: ℓ < n |m | ≤ ℓ ℓ E E 0 n n2 Stern-Gerlach experiment If the particles were classical spinning objects, one would expect the distribution of their spin angular momentum vectors to be random and continuous. Each particle would be deflected by a different amount, producing some density distribution on the detector screen. Instead, the particles passing through the Stern–Gerlach apparatus are deflected either up or down by a specific amount.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom
    The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom Quantum Numbers In order to describe the probable location of electrons, they are assigned four numbers called quantum numbers. The quantum numbers of an electron are kind of like the electron’s “address”. No two electrons can be described by the exact same four quantum numbers. This is called The Pauli Exclusion Principle. • Principle quantum number: The principle quantum number describes which orbit the electron is in and therefore how much energy the electron has. - it is symbolized by the letter n. - positive whole numbers are assigned (not including 0): n=1, n=2, n=3 , etc - the higher the number, the further the orbit from the nucleus - the higher the number, the more energy the electron has (this is sort of like Bohr’s energy levels) - the orbits (energy levels) are also called shells • Angular momentum (azimuthal) quantum number: The azimuthal quantum number describes the sublevels (subshells) that occur in each of the levels (shells) described above. - it is symbolized by the letter l - positive whole number values including 0 are assigned: l = 0, l = 1, l = 2, etc. - each number represents the shape of a subshell: l = 0, represents an s subshell l = 1, represents a p subshell l = 2, represents a d subshell l = 3, represents an f subshell - the higher the number, the more complex the shape of the subshell. The picture below shows the shape of the s and p subshells: (notice the electron clouds) • Magnetic quantum number: All of the subshells described above (except s) have more than one orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the LOCALIZED QUANTUM VACUUM FIELD D. Dragoman
    1 THE LOCALIZED QUANTUM VACUUM FIELD D. Dragoman – Univ. Bucharest, Physics Dept., P.O. Box MG-11, 077125 Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A model for the localized quantum vacuum is proposed in which the zero-point energy of the quantum electromagnetic field originates in energy- and momentum-conserving transitions of material systems from their ground state to an unstable state with negative energy. These transitions are accompanied by emissions and re-absorptions of real photons, which generate a localized quantum vacuum in the neighborhood of material systems. The model could help resolve the cosmological paradox associated to the zero-point energy of electromagnetic fields, while reclaiming quantum effects associated with quantum vacuum such as the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift; it also offers a new insight into the Zitterbewegung of material particles. 2 INTRODUCTION The zero-point energy (ZPE) of the quantum electromagnetic field is at the same time an indispensable concept of quantum field theory and a controversial issue (see [1] for an excellent review of the subject). The need of the ZPE has been recognized from the beginning of quantum theory of radiation, since only the inclusion of this term assures no first-order temperature-independent correction to the average energy of an oscillator in thermal equilibrium with blackbody radiation in the classical limit of high temperatures. A more rigorous introduction of the ZPE stems from the treatment of the electromagnetic radiation as an ensemble of harmonic quantum oscillators. Then, the total energy of the quantum electromagnetic field is given by E = åk,s hwk (nks +1/ 2) , where nks is the number of quantum oscillators (photons) in the (k,s) mode that propagate with wavevector k and frequency wk =| k | c = kc , and are characterized by the polarization index s.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
    Chapter 4, page 1 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Pieter Zeeman observed in 1896 the splitting of optical spectral lines in the field of an electromagnet. Since then, the splitting of energy levels proportional to an external magnetic field has been called the "Zeeman effect". The "Zeeman resonance effect" causes magnetic resonances which are classified under radio frequency spectroscopy (rf spectroscopy). In these resonances, the transitions between two branches of a single energy level split in an external magnetic field are measured in the megahertz and gigahertz range. In 1944, Jevgeni Konstantinovitch Savoiski discovered electron paramagnetic resonance. Shortly thereafter in 1945, nuclear magnetic resonance was demonstrated almost simultaneously in Boston by Edward Mills Purcell and in Stanford by Felix Bloch. Nuclear magnetic resonance was sometimes called nuclear induction or paramagnetic nuclear resonance. It is generally abbreviated to NMR. So as not to scare prospective patients in medicine, reference to the "nuclear" character of NMR is dropped and the magnetic resonance based imaging systems (scanner) found in hospitals are simply referred to as "magnetic resonance imaging" (MRI). 4.1 The Nuclear Resonance Effect Many atomic nuclei have spin, characterized by the nuclear spin quantum number I. The absolute value of the spin angular momentum is L =+h II(1). (4.01) The component in the direction of an applied field is Lz = Iz h ≡ m h. (4.02) The external field is usually defined along the z-direction. The magnetic quantum number is symbolized by Iz or m and can have 2I +1 values: Iz ≡ m = −I, −I+1, ..., I−1, I.
    [Show full text]
  • DEGENERACY CURVES, GAPS, and DIABOLICAL POINTS in the SPECTRA of NEUMANN PARALLELOGRAMS P Overfelt
    DEGENERACY CURVES, GAPS, AND DIABOLICAL POINTS IN THE SPECTRA OF NEUMANN PARALLELOGRAMS P Overfelt To cite this version: P Overfelt. DEGENERACY CURVES, GAPS, AND DIABOLICAL POINTS IN THE SPECTRA OF NEUMANN PARALLELOGRAMS. 2020. hal-03017250 HAL Id: hal-03017250 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03017250 Preprint submitted on 20 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DEGENERACY CURVES, GAPS, AND DIABOLICAL POINTS IN THE SPECTRA OF NEUMANN PARALLELOGRAMS P. L. OVERFELT Abstract. In this paper we consider the problem of solving the Helmholtz equation over the space of all parallelograms subject to Neumann boundary conditions and determining the degeneracies occurring in their spectra upon changing the two parameters, angle and side ratio. This problem is solved numerically using the finite element method (FEM). Specifically for the lowest eleven normalized eigenvalue levels of the family of Neumann parallelograms, the intersection of two (or more) adjacent eigen- value level surfaces occurs in one of three ways: either as an isolated point associated with the special geometries, i.e., the rectangle, the square, or the rhombus, as part of a degeneracy curve which appears to contain an infinite number of points, or as a diabolical point in the Neumann parallelogram spec- trum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle*
    OpenStax-CNX module: m58578 1 The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle* OpenStax This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 Abstract By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Describe the physical meaning of the position-momentum uncertainty relation • Explain the origins of the uncertainty principle in quantum theory • Describe the physical meaning of the energy-time uncertainty relation Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a key principle in quantum mechanics. Very roughly, it states that if we know everything about where a particle is located (the uncertainty of position is small), we know nothing about its momentum (the uncertainty of momentum is large), and vice versa. Versions of the uncertainty principle also exist for other quantities as well, such as energy and time. We discuss the momentum-position and energy-time uncertainty principles separately. 1 Momentum and Position To illustrate the momentum-position uncertainty principle, consider a free particle that moves along the x- direction. The particle moves with a constant velocity u and momentum p = mu. According to de Broglie's relations, p = }k and E = }!. As discussed in the previous section, the wave function for this particle is given by −i(! t−k x) −i ! t i k x k (x; t) = A [cos (! t − k x) − i sin (! t − k x)] = Ae = Ae e (1) 2 2 and the probability density j k (x; t) j = A is uniform and independent of time. The particle is equally likely to be found anywhere along the x-axis but has denite values of wavelength and wave number, and therefore momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 the Variational Principle
    8 The Variational Principle 8.1 Approximate solution of the Schroedinger equation If we can’t find an analytic solution to the Schroedinger equation, a trick known as the varia- tional principle allows us to estimate the energy of the ground state of a system. We choose an unnormalized trial function Φ(an) which depends on some variational parameters, an and minimise hΦ|Hˆ |Φi E[a ] = n hΦ|Φi with respect to those parameters. This gives an approximation to the wavefunction whose accuracy depends on the number of parameters and the clever choice of Φ(an). For more rigorous treatments, a set of basis functions with expansion coefficients an may be used. The proof is as follows, if we expand the normalised wavefunction 1/2 |φ(an)i = Φ(an)/hΦ(an)|Φ(an)i in terms of the true (unknown) eigenbasis |ii of the Hamiltonian, then its energy is X X X ˆ 2 2 E[an] = hφ|iihi|H|jihj|φi = |hφ|ii| Ei = E0 + |hφ|ii| (Ei − E0) ≥ E0 ij i i ˆ where the true (unknown) ground state of the system is defined by H|i0i = E0|i0i. The inequality 2 arises because both |hφ|ii| and (Ei − E0) must be positive. Thus the lower we can make the energy E[ai], the closer it will be to the actual ground state energy, and the closer |φi will be to |i0i. If the trial wavefunction consists of a complete basis set of orthonormal functions |χ i, each P i multiplied by ai: |φi = i ai|χii then the solution is exact and we just have the usual trick of expanding a wavefunction in a basis set.
    [Show full text]