DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree Of Opening up Openness to Experience: An appraisal process approach towards understanding individual differences in epistemic engagement. Kirill Fayn School of Psychology University of Sydney A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) 2016 ii Declaration I hereby certify that this thesis does not contain, without appropriate acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university. I also certify that this thesis does not contain, to the best of my knowledge, any material previously published or written by another person, except where die reference is made. Kirill Fayn iii Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my wonderful supervisors. Carolyn MacCann was a constant source of wisdom and inspiration. Her advice and encouragement helped me to see the light at the end of the tunnel. I am forever grateful to Niko Tiliopoulos for supervising and guiding me throughout my undergraduate and postgraduate studies. Through his wild passion for personality Niko helped me to understand and love the discipline that embraces the unusual and is nonplussed by the ‘average’ person. Niko’s constant guidance, advice, and support helped me to become a better scientist as well as a better human being. I was also very fortunate to receive guidance and support from Paul Silvia. Finding someone with a shared appreciation of interest as well as interesting shirts is rare and wonderful. Learning from Paul was truly awe inspiring. To my wonderful mum and dad, thank you for the many years of love, support and tolerance you have bestowed on me. It goes without saying that this thesis would not have been possible without you. To my brothers from other mothers and sisters from other misters, you are my tribe, my village, my happy place. Thank you for your patience and support during this period. I am endlessly grateful to have you in my life. To the curious curious bunch, thank you for all the great times at Mr Falcons. By combining philosophy, science and beer we have discovered (and subsequently forgotten) the keys to a good life. To Two Scoops, a three-peat is what was needed to get me over the line. Without all the winning, the last few years would feel a lot more like losing. Love you guys! iv Special thanks to Pete and Jeanne who welcomed me into their home for the last stage of this thesis. I am forever in your debt and ready to provide tech support. I would also like to thank the amazing lecturers that I was privileged to learn from throughout my studies at the University of Sydney. In an age where lecture attendance is on the decline, these amazing teachers gave me an appreciation of psychology and kept me coming back for more. Particular thanks to Damien Birney, Alex Holcombe, Ian Johnstone, Sally Andrews and Karen Kroot for being consistently fascinating. v Abstract This thesis offers new insights into the relationship between epistemic engagement and the personality domain of Openness to Experience. In seeking to better understand this relationship, the unique influence of the lower order aspects of Openness and Intellect on engagement was evaluated. Particularly, the proposal that Openness and Intellect represent individual differences in engagement with diverging information is tested—Openness with sensory and perceptual, and Intellect with abstract and semantic. Additionally, a process- based understanding for the differences between the aspects in the context of engagement with information was sought. Such an understanding can shift Openness/Intellect beyond a descriptive construct, and provide explanations for relationships between the domain and epistemic engagement. Four studies evaluated whether Openness and Intellect were differentially related to interest in various informational stimuli—quotations (study 1), visual art (study 2, 3 and 4), philosophy and science (study 4). Throughout the studies, Openness was the consistent predictor of interest in all stimuli. The influence of Openness on engagement was also consistently qualified by appraisal-emotion contingencies. Particularly, Openness was associated with stronger novelty-interest relationships suggesting a reactivity to novel and complex situations. The implications of this finding for the previously observed relationships between Openness, Cognitive Abilities, and Educational outcomes are discussed. The lack of associations between engagement and Intellect is, in part, explained by the measurement of the construct being misaligned with its conceptualisation. Overall, these findings suggest that a clear engagement distinction between Openness and Intellect in terms of stimulus type is premature. Instead, Openness seems to currently represent the affective engagement aspect of the domain, while Intellect is related to greater understanding, but not interest. vi Publications and presentations relating to this thesis Publications Fayn, K., Tiliopoulos, N., & MacCann, C. (2015). Interest in truth versus beauty: Intellect and Openness reflect different pathways towards interest. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 47-52. Fayn, K., MacCann, C., Tiliopoulos, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1877. Conference presentations Fayn, K. (2015). Symposium: The Thrills of Life and Death: The Transformational Nature of Awe From a Personality Perspective. Proceedings of the 14th Australian Conference on Personality & Individual Differences. Smillie, L. & Fayn, K. (2014). Symposium: Exploring the fifth dimension: Causes and consequences of Openness/Intellect. Proceedings of the 13th Australian Conference on Personality & Individual Differences. Fayn, K. (2014). Identifying two distinct pathways to epistemic engagement: Interest in truth versus interest in beauty. University of Wollongong Colloquium. Fayn, K., Tiliopoulos, N., MacCann, C., & Silvia, P. (2014). Opening up Openness/intellect: A multilevel process approach towards understanding epistemic engagement. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference of Personality. Fayn, K. & Tiliopoulos, N. (2013). Gratefully curious: a multilevel analysis of individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. First World Conference on Personality – Stellenbosch, South Africa. vii Fayn, K., Tiliopoulos, N., MacCann, C., & Silvia, P. (2013). Openness as a Moderator of Emotion-Appraisal and Interest-Fascination Relationships in the Context of Art Appreciation. International Society for the Study of Individual Differences. Fayn, K., Tiliopoulos, N., MacCann, C., & Silvia, P. (2013). Openness versus Intellect: Interest in Beauty versus Interest in Truth. Proceedings of the 12th Australian Conference on Personality & Individual Differences. Fayn, K., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). Open to Not Understanding and Grateful For the Experience: A Process Approach to Studying the Association between Aesthetic Appreciation and Personality. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Conference on Personality & Individual Differences. Fayn, K., Tiliopoulos, N., Birney, D., & Pallier, G. (2011). Our best thoughts come from others: Individual differences in engagement with art and science. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Conference on Personality & Individual Differences. viii Table of contents Declaration ..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... iii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... v Publications and presentations relating to this thesis .................................................. v Table of contents ........................................................................................................ viii List of figures and tables .............................................................................................. xv Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 2 Openness/Intellect: Discovery, disagreements, and definitions ............................... 5 Openness versus Intellect: The great debate ........................................................ 6 Openness and Intellect: Together yet apart ........................................................ 10 The emotion of Interest as engagement with information ..................................... 14 From state to trait: Interest and Openness/Intellect .............................................. 16 From social-cognitive processes to states to traits: Process differences between individuals in appraisals ....................................................................................................... 19 The appraisal structure of interest ...................................................................... 22 Individual differences in interest appraisal processes ......................................... 23 Social-Cognitive model of Openness/Intellect and engagement with information 25 References ............................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 2: Interest in truth versus beauty: Intellect and Openness reflect different pathways towards Interest .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Correlation Between the Level of Extraversion and Writing Achievement of the Fifth Semester Students of English and Literature in Uin Alauddin Makassar
    THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE LEVEL OF EXTRAVERSION AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE FIFTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH AND LITERATURE IN UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR THESIS Submitted to the Adab and Humanities Faculty State Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Humaniora By: ANDI NUR CHALISHAH Reg. Num. 40300113078 ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT ADAB AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR 2017 PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN SKRIPSI Dengan penuh kesadaran, penulis yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini menyatakan bahwa skrisi ini benar-benar adalah hasil karya penulis sendiri, dan jika kemudian hari terbukti merupakan duplikat, tiruan, plagiat atau dibuat oleh orang lain secara keseluruhan ataupun sebagian, maka skripsi ini dan gelar yang diperoleh batal demi hukum. Romang Polong, 24 November 2017 ANDI NUR CHALISHAH ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Alhamdulillahi rabbil ‘alamin, the researcher would like to express her confession and gratitude to the Most Perfection, Allah Swt for the guidance, blessing and mercy in completing this thesis. Shalawat and salam are always delivered to the Great Prophet Muhammad Saw, his family and followers till the end of the time. The researcher was fully aware that there were a lot of challenges she had been through the process of accomplishing this research. The researcher would not make it to this position where she is now without getting assistance, support, helps, motivations, criticisms, encouragement and guidance from many people. Therefore, the researcher would like to express her deepest gratitude to the following: 1. The researcher’s beloved parents Andi Maulana and Suryani H.P. for their prayers, endless supports and love.
    [Show full text]
  • Personality Correlates of the Four-Factor Model of Cultural Intelligence
    10.1177/1059601105275267GROUPAng et al. & / ORGANIZATIONPERSONALITY AND MANAGEMENT CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE Personality Correlates of the Four-Factor Model of Cultural Intelligence SOON ANG Nanyang Technological University LINN VAN DYNE Michigan State University CHRISTINE KOH Nanyang Technological University We examine relationships between Big Five personality and the four-factor model of cultural intelligence (CQ)—metacognitive CQ, cognitive CQ, motivational CQ, and behavioral CQ. Hierarchical regression analyses conducted on data from 338 business undergraduates—after controlling for age, gender, and years of experience in interacting with people from other cultures—show significant links between (a) conscientiousness and metacognitive CQ; (b) agreeableness and emotional stability with behavioral CQ; (c) extraversion with cognitive, moti- vational, and behavioral CQ; and (d) openness with all four factors of CQ. The intriguing finding of this study is that openness was the only Big Five that was significantly related to all four aspects of CQ. This differs from prior research on openness that found few significant relation- ships. Our results show that openness to experience is a crucial personality characteristic that is related to a person’s capability to function effectively in diverse cultural settings (CQ). Keywords: cultural intelligence; personality; Big Five With greater diversity in the workforce demography and business organiza- tions entrenched in the global economy, individuals need to work and inter- act regularly with those who have different cultural or ethnic backgrounds. Working with people from different cultures can be difficult for individuals and for their organizations because cultural barriers can cause misunder- standings that detract from efficient and effective interactions (Adler, 2002; Gelfand, Nishii, Holcombe, Dyer, Ohbuchi, & Fukuno, 2001; Kraimer, Wayne, & Jaworski, 2001; Lievens, Harris, Van Keer, & Bisqueret, 2003; We thank K.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioural Genetics Studies HERE
    KKaarrmmaaggeenneess BBaacckkggrroouunndd ccoonntteenntt 0011 Behavioral Genetics 0022 The Science Behind Karmagenes 0033 From DNA to Behavior 0044 5 Factors Personality (Big 5/OCEAN) Behavioral Genetics Timeline 380 BC Plato Plato, one of the founders of Western 1610 philosophy, rst Introduced the terms Nature and Nurture, in his Protagoras dialogue. William Shakespeare In Shakespeare's play The Tempest, protagonist 1869 Prospero notes: ‘‘A devil, a born devil, on whose Hereditary Genius nature Nurture can never stick; on whom my pains, Victorian polymath Sir Francis Galton, officially Humanely taken, all, all lost, quite lost; And as with introduced the notion of "Nature vs Nature" in age his body uglier grows, So his mind cankers. I will his book Hereditary Genius (1869), the rst plague them all, Even to roaring." social scientic attempt to s t u d y genius and greatness. He is considered the father of 1913 modern-day behavioural genetics. Theodore Roosevelt Theodore Roosevelt in his letter to Charles Fitter Families 1920 Davenport : ‘’Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty, of a good citizen Fitter Families, were contests rst launched in of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind 1920 in Kansas with the support of the American him in the world.” Eugenics Society, aiming to identify and reward the family with the highest degree of psychological and physical tness among its Eugenic movement member, as measured by a team of medical 1930 doctors. This period witnessed a sharp increase in the number of scientic publications researching heritability of behaviour. Meanwhile, the popularity Buck vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bottom up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy
    Forthcoming in the European Journal of Psychological Assessment Bottom Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy David M. Condon*, University of Oregon, USA Dustin Wood, University of Alabama, USA René Mõttus, University of Edinburgh, UK and University of Tartu, Estonia Tom Booth, University of Edinburgh, UK Giulio Costantini, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy Samuel Greiff, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Wendy Johnson, University of Edinburgh, UK Aaron Lukaszewski, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA Aja Murray, University of Edinburgh, UK William Revelle, Northwestern University, USA Aidan G.C. Wright, University of Pittsburgh, USA Matthias Ziegler, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany Johannes Zimmermann, University of Kassel, Germany * Correspondence to David Condon, 1227 University St, Eugene, OR, 97403 USA [email protected] This manuscript is based on an Expert Meeting jointly supported by European Association of Personality Psychology and European Association of Psychological Assessment and held from 6th to 8th September 2018 in Edinburgh, Scotland (https://osf.io/fn5pw). The authors are grateful to Mitja Back, Anna Baumert, Jaime Derringer, Sacha Epskamp, Ryne Sherman, David Stillwell, and Tal Yarkoni for their contributions to the Expert Meeting. Not all authors agree with all arguments put forward in this paper. Bottom-Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy 2 Abstract In pursuit of a more systematic and comprehensive framework for personality assessment, we introduce procedures for assessing personality traits at the lowest level: nuances. We argue that constructing a personality taxonomy from the bottom up addresses some of the limitations of extant top-down assessment frameworks (e.g., the Big Five), including the opportunity to resolve confusion about the breadth and scope of traits at different levels of organization, evaluate unique and reliable trait variance at the item level, and clarify jingle/jangle issues in personality assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications
    An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications Robert R. McCrae National Institute on Aging, NIH Oliver P. John University of California at Berkeley ABSTRACT The five-factor model of personality is a hierarchical organi- zation of personality traits in terms of five basic dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience. Research using both natural language adjectives and theoretically based per- sonality questionnaires supports the comprehensiveness of the model and its applicability across observers and cultures. This article summarizes the history of the model and its supporting evidence; discusses conceptions of the nature of the factors; and outlines an agenda for theorizing about the origins and operation of the factors. We argue that the model should prove useful both for individual assessment and for the elucidation of a number of topics of interest to personality psychologists. What are the basic dimensions of personality, the most important ways in which individuals differ in their enduring emotional, interpersonal, experiential, attitudinal, and motivational styles? Personality theorists have offered hundreds of candidates, and for decades factor analysts attempted to bring order to the resulting confusion by factoring person- ality scales. Instead of resolving the issue, however, these studies only contributed another layer of controversy, most familiar in the compet- We are grateful to Michael Bond, Peter Borkenau, David Buss, Paul Costa, Donald Fiske, Lew Goldberg, Robert Hogan, and Warren Norman for comments on this manu- script, and to Stephen G. West and the associate editors of this journal for their advice and assistance on this special issue. Correspondence may be addressed to Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitous Personality-Trait Concepts in 13 Diverse and Isolated Languages: a Cluster–Classification Approach
    European Journal of Personality, Eur. J. Pers. 34: 164–179 (2020) Published online 3 March 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/per.2246 Ubiquitous Personality-Trait Concepts in 13 Diverse and Isolated Languages: A Cluster–Classification Approach JOSHUA K. WOOD1*, MICHAEL GURVEN2 and LEWIS R. GOLDBERG3 1School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia 2Department of Anthropology, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA 3Oregon Research Institute, USA Abstract: There is longstanding interest in the generalizability of personality across diverse cultures. To investigate the generalizability of personality concepts, we examined the English translations of individual-difference entries from the dictionaries of 12 small-scale societies previously studied for ubiquity of individual differences plus the dic- tionary of an additional society not previously studied in this manner. These 13 societies are highly diverse in geo- graphical location, culture, and language family; their languages developed in isolation from modern-world languages. The goal of our exploratory research was to discover ubiquitous personality concepts in these 13 indepen- dent societies and their languages, providing a window into personality concepts across a broad range of cultures and languages. This study used clusters of empirically related terms (e.g. brave, courageous, and daring), based on a tax- onomy of English-language personality concepts that consisted of 100 personality-trait clusters. English-language definitions of dictionary entries from the 13 languages were matched to the meanings of the synonym clusters. The cluster–classification method uncovered nine ubiquitous personality concepts, plus six that were present in at least 12 of the 13 languages. The nine ubiquitous personality concepts include some not previously identified and suggest a core of possibly universal concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure
    IZA DP No. 10356 What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure Lex Borghans Bart H.H. Golsteyn James J. Heckman John Eric Humphries November 2016 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure Lex Borghans Maastricht University and IZA Bart H.H. Golsteyn Maastricht University and IZA James J. Heckman University of Chicago, American Bar Foundation and IZA John Eric Humphries University of Chicago Discussion Paper No. 10356 November 2016 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Factor Model of Personality Christopher J
    Five-Factor Model of Personality Christopher J. Soto, Joshua J. Jackson Introduction The five-factor model of personality (FFM) is a set of five broad trait dimensions or domains, often referred to as the “Big Five”: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism (sometimes named by its polar opposite, Emotional Stability), and Openness to Experience (sometimes named Intellect). Highly extraverted individuals are assertive and sociable, rather than quiet and reserved. Agreeable individuals are cooperative and polite, rather than antagonistic and rude. Conscientious individuals are task- focused and orderly, rather than distractible and disorganized. Neurotic individuals are prone to experiencing negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and irritation, rather than being emotionally resilient. Finally, highly open individuals have a broad rather than narrow range of interests, are sensitive rather than indifferent to art and beauty, and prefer novelty to routine. The Big Five/FFM was developed to represent as much of the variability in individuals’ personalities as possible, using only a small set of trait dimensions. Many personality psychologists agree that its five domains capture the most important, basic individual differences in personality traits and that many alternative trait models can be conceptualized in terms of the Big Five/FFM structure. The goal of this article is to reference, organize, and comment on a variety of classic and contemporary papers related to the Big Five/FFM. This article begins with papers that introduce the Big Five/FFM structure, approach it from different theoretical perspectives, and consider possible objections to it (General Overviews, Theoretical Perspectives, and Critiques). Next, it discusses papers providing evidence for the Big Five/FFM as a model of basic trait structure (Big Five/FFM Structure).
    [Show full text]
  • A Lexical Approach to Collective Personality Using Nongroup Members As Raters
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2021 A Lexical Approach to Collective Personality Using Nongroup Members as Raters Robert Cameron Black Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Personality and Social Contexts Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Robert Black has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Sandra Mahoney, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Brandy Benson, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Lisa Scharff, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract A Lexical Approach to Collective Personality Using Nongroup Members as Raters by Robert Black Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University February 2021 Abstract The construct of personality exhibits utility in predicting group outcomes. However, quantifying a group personality construct has almost exclusively been accomplished by aggregating individual group member five-factor personality scores to derive the group personality score. This type of operationalizing rests on the assumption that collective personality exists and has a five-factor structure, makes results context specific, and limits cross-comparison of different types of groups.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Beyond the Big Five? Plenty!
    What Is Beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Sampo V. Paunonen Douglas N. Jackson University of Western Ontario ABSTRACT In a recent analysis of personality data, Saucier and Goldberg (1998) sought to answer the question, What is beyond the Big Five? Those authors evaluated numerous clusters of English person-descriptive adjectives that have been suspected of referring to non–Big Five dimensions of personality. Their results led them to conclude that most, if not all, traits of personality can be adequately subsumed within the Big Five factor space. In contrast, our reanalysis of Saucier and Goldberg’s own data, using a more realistic criterion for deciding on whether a variable does or does not fall within a particular factor space, contradicts their claim. We are led to the conclusion that there are plenty of dimensions of behavior beyond the Big Five. Few topics in contemporary psychology have generated as much research and theoretical interest as has the Five-Factor Model of personality. That model has been embraced not only by a personality psychologist, but by researchers in clinical, industrial/organizational, and developmental psy- chology as well. The Five-Factor Model, of course, posits that there is a structure to individual differences in human behavior, such that the traits of personality can be reduced to five orthogonal factors of personal- ity—the so-called Big Five. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Research Grant 410-98-1555 to Sampo V.Paunonen. WethankMichael Ashton and Kibeom Lee for their comments on this article. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sampo V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits
    IZA DP No. 3333 The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits Lex Borghans Angela Lee Duckworth James J. Heckman Bas ter Weel DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER February 2008 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits Lex Borghans ROA, Maastricht University and IZA Angela Lee Duckworth University of Pennsylvania James J. Heckman University of Chicago, American Bar Foundation, University College Dublin and IZA Bas ter Weel CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University and IZA Discussion Paper No. 3333 February 2008 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post World Net. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conjectural History of Cambridge Analytica's Eugenic Roots
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0505-5 OPEN Sordid genealogies: a conjectural history of Cambridge Analytica’s eugenic roots ✉ Michael Wintroub1 “Sordid Genealogies: A Conjectural History of Cambridge Analytica’s Eugenic Roots” explores the history of the methods employed by Cambridge Analytica to influence the 2016 US presidential election. It focuses on the history of psychometric analysis, trait psychology, the 1234567890():,; lexical hypothesis and multivariate factor analysis, and how they developed in close con- junction with the history of eugenics. More particularly, it will analyze how the work of Francis Galton, Ludwig Klages, Charles Spearman, and Raymond Cattell (among others) contributed to the manifold translations between statistics, the pseudoscience of eugenics, the politics of Trumpism, and the data driven psychology of the personality championed by Cambridge Analytica. 1 University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. ✉email: [email protected] HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | (2020) 7:41 | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0505-5 1 ARTICLE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0505-5 translation of the Old Testament from Hebrew to Greek, they Once King Ptolemy gathered seventy-two elders and put might, in the same breath, have contested the veracity of its them into seventy-two houses, and did not reveal to them content. why he gathered them. He entered each room and said to “ ” Similar conundrums have troubled the ways we have thought them: Write the Torah of Moses your rabbi for me . The about translation since the invention of fiction as a genre in the Holy One, blessed by He gave counsel into each of their early modern period.
    [Show full text]