Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation Report Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation Report Draft Alternative Executive Summary UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL JULY 14 2021, 09:00 DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE WITHOUT EDITORS’ PERMISSION July 13 2021 Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Human Rights: Summary of Findings .................................................................................................. 10 2. Unmarried Motherhood in Context ............................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Concealment ............................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Impacts of the Law on Illegitimacy ....................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Natural Fathers ........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.4 Profit and Responsibility ........................................................................................................................ 18 3. In the Institutions. .......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Governance and Responsibility ............................................................................................................ 21 3.2 Social Welfare .......................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Unpaid Labour ........................................................................................................................................ 27 3.4 Admissions and Detention ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.5 Admissions and Sexual Abuse .............................................................................................................. 33 3.6 Inhuman and Degrading Treatment ..................................................................................................... 35 3.7 Deaths and Burials .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.8 Obstetric Violence ................................................................................................................................... 40 3.9 Vaccine and Milk Trials .......................................................................................................................... 42 4. Family Separation .......................................................................................................................................... 44 4.1 Harms of Family Separation .................................................................................................................. 45 4.2 Domestic Adoption ................................................................................................................................. 48 4.3 Intercountry Adoption ........................................................................................................................... 52 5. Discrimination ................................................................................................................................................ 54 5.1 Race ........................................................................................................................................................... 54 5.2 Disability .................................................................................................................................................. 57 5.3 Travellers .................................................................................................................................................. 58 5.4 Religion ..................................................................................................................................................... 60 6. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................... 62 7. Clann Recommendations for Action ........................................................................................................... 67 8.Notes on Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 69 8.1 Process and Motivation .......................................................................................................................... 69 8.2 What are the Limitations of this Document? ....................................................................................... 69 8.3 Language .................................................................................................................................................. 71 8.4 Voice .......................................................................................................................................................... 72 8.5 Testimony before the Confidential Committee: Law and Oral Testimony ..................................... 75 1 8.6 Our Approach to Oral Evidence ........................................................................................................... 78 8.7 A Feminist Rights-based Analysis ........................................................................................................ 81 8.7 Law in Context ........................................................................................................................................ 82 8.8 Law and Time .......................................................................................................................................... 83 2 FOREWORD This document is written in solidarity with all those, in Ireland and overseas, who experienced human rights violations in the ‘mother and baby homes’ and associated institutions, or whose rights were violated by the wider system of family separation of which those institutions were a part. Affected people include women who were separated from their children, people adopted, fostered and ‘boarded out’ from the institutions, their parents, siblings and wider families. They also include women and children who died in the institutions, and those sent from one institution to another; perhaps a laundry, a psychiatric hospital or an industrial school. Many affected people have campaigned for decades so that their experiences could receive a full public hearing. This project is inspired by their refusal to let the State control their personal narratives, and public understanding of Ireland’s national history. We are academic specialists in human rights law, family law, criminal justice, equalities, social welfare law, legal history and histories of institutionalisation. This document is our ‘rapid response’ to the 2021 Final Report of the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation (‘the Report’). We have rewritten the Report’s Executive Summary. This document is intended to be read as an alternative Executive Summary to the Report. References in footnotes, unless otherwise stated are to that Report. Inline references in brackets –- e.g. (1.1) - are to numbered sections of this document. Our ‘rewrite’ is not comprehensive. It concentrates on the aspects of the Executive Summary that are most relevant to a legal analysis. Unlike the original Executive Summary, it is organised by legal topic and by type of rights violation. This means that this document may address issues in a different order to the original Report. It also means that it connects issues drawn from across several different chapters of the Report. We have not taken account of any of the many developments since the Report was published in writing Sections 1-6, though we have reflected on some in Section 8. We have not, and cannot, gather new evidence or new personal testimony. We have rewritten the Executive Summary because it is the section of the Report that most people have read, and it is the section that outlines the Commission’s findings. We are concerned that the findings do not fully reflect the evidence presented in the main body of the Report and often minimise the State’s current obligations to those affected by mass ‘historical’ abuses. Re-writing the Executive Summary also allowed us to respond relatively quickly alongside our ordinary academic workloads. Of course, as is evident from our footnotes, in re-writing the Executive Summary, we examined the Report thoroughly and as a whole. For a more detailed explanation of how this document was written and why, please see the ‘Notes on Methodology’ (Section 8 of this document). Many questions about the limitations of this document, and about why we have adopted certain kinds of language or taken a particular approach to evidence are answered there. The Report itself does not include a substantive discussion
Recommended publications
  • Dear Members of PA NOW, in 1952, Irish-Born Philomena Lee Gave Birth
    Dear Members of PA NOW, In 1952, Irish-born Philomena Lee gave birth to her son Anthony at the State-funded Sean Ross Abbey mother-baby home in Roscrea, Co. Tipperary. Sean Ross was one of three mother-baby homes run by the Sacred Heart Sisters in Ireland, responsible for more than 25,000 adoptions in and from Ireland. Despite the state's funding of the home, for three years, Philomena nurtured and loved her son while working off ‘her keep’ in the home’s laundry, until her son was cruelly taken from her and trafficked for adoption to the US. Anthony was one of more than 2,000 such ‘Banished Babies’ sent to the US, including nearly 100 Pennsylvania citizens (c.f. Banished Babies, Mike Milotte, 1997). I am one of those as well, adopted from Ireland to Philadelphia in 1961. My loving adoptive parents were always truthful with my younger adoptive brother and me about our circumstances, and always respected our right to know who we are. I am also the mother of a daughter born in Philadelphia in 1978 who I was forced to relinquish in a closed, coercive adoption orchestrated by Philadelphia Catholic Charities. I was not asked to sign a confidentiality agreement at the time, nor did I seek such confidentiality. I've always believed, as does Philomena, that we are accountable to our children. For many years, Philomena tried in vain to contact her son, or at least determine if he was happy and well and gave the Sisters her contact information. Each time, she was rebuffed by them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coonans of Roscrea by Michael F
    The Coonans of Roscrea By Michael F. McGraw, Ph.D. [email protected] October 26, 2018 Introduction This continues the effort to organize, consolidate and extend the research of Robert Conan. The following paper concerns the Coonan families found in the area of Ireland around Roscrea, Co. Tipperary. The material found in Conan’s notes pertaining to this subject consists of two parts: (1) a structured family report covering five generations and (2) a set of interviews conducted by Robert Conan in Ireland in 1970 and 1972. The data in the structured family report covers the period from the mid-1700s to the early 1800s and is discussed in Part I of this paper. Information was also found on a Roscrea family which had immigrated to Australia in 1865; they are also included in this part of the paper. The Robert Conan interviews covered the then current generation of Coonan descendants and went back one or two generations and which forms Part II of the paper. The overall goal is to connect the earlier Coonan generations with the more recent descendants, where possible. As many church and civil records as possible were collected to complement those collected by Robert Conan during his visits to Ireland. The information has been structured as family trees to achieve a concentration of the information and to increase the probability of discovering other family connections. The geographic proximity of the families described in this paper holds the promise of finding connections among them. A more long range goal is to find connections with the Upperchurch Coonan families, which were described in an earlier paper.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham "Like a Dog": Remaking the Irish Law Of
    University of Birmingham "Like a Dog": Remaking the Irish Law of Institutional Abuse Enright, Mairead Document Version Version created as part of publication process; publisher's layout; not normally made publicly available Citation for published version (Harvard): Enright, M 2020, "Like a Dog": Remaking the Irish Law of Institutional Abuse. in S Browne (ed.), The Law is a White Dog: TULCA Festival of Visual Arts. TULCA Publishing, Galway, Ireland, pp. 111 - 135. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Tax Exemption
    Charities granted tax exemption under s207 Taxes Consolidation Act (TCA) 1997 - 30 June 2021 Queries via Revenue's MyEnquiries facility to: Charities and Sports Exemption Unit or telephone 01 7383680 Chy No Charity Name Charity Address Taxation Officer Trinity College Dublin Financial Services Division 3 - 5 11 Trinity College Dublin College Green Dublin 2 21 National University Of Ireland 49 Merrion Sq Dublin 2 36 Association For Promoting Christian Knowledge Church Of Ireland House Church Avenue Rathmines Dublin 6 41 Saint Patrick's College Maynooth County Kildare 53 Saint Jarlath's College Trust Tuam Co Galway 54 Sunday School Society For Ireland Holy Trinity Church Church Ave Rathmines Dublin 6 61 Phibsboro Sunday And Daily Schools 23 Connaught St Phibsborough Dublin 7 62 Adelaide Blake Trust 66 Fitzwilliam Lane Dublin 2 63 Swords Old Borough School C/O Mr Richard Middleton Church Road Swords County Dublin 65 Waterford And Bishop Foy Endowed School Granore Grange Park Crescent Waterford 66 Governor Of Lifford Endowed Schools C/O Des West Secretary Carrickbrack House Convoy Co Donegal 68 Alexandra College Milltown Dublin 6 The Congregation Of The Holy Spirit Province Of 76 Ireland (The Province) Under The Protection Of The Temple Park Richmond Avenue South Dublin 6 Immaculate Heart Of Mary 79 Society Of Friends Paul Dooley Newtown School Waterford City 80 Mount Saint Josephs Abbey Mount Heaton Roscrea Co Tiobrad Aran 82 Crofton School Trust Ballycurry Ashford Co Wicklow 83 Kings Hospital Per The Bursar Ronald Wynne Kings Hospital Palmerstown
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1003 Wednesday, No. 3 20 January 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Pay for Student Nurses and Midwives: Motion [Private Members] � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 204 Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders’ Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 231 20/01/2021Y00400Personal Explanation by Minister of State � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 242 20/01/2021Y00700An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 242 20/01/2021CC01400EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement: Motion � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 251 20/01/2021RR00200Report of the Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes: Statements (Resumed)� � � � � � � � 280 DÁIL ÉIREANN Dé Céadaoin, 20 Eanáir 2021 Wednesday, 20 January 2021 Chuaigh an Leas-Cheann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10 a�m� Paidir. Prayer. Pay for Student Nurses and Midwives: Motion [Private Members] 20/01/2021A00200Deputy David Cullinane: I move: “That Dáil Éireann: notes that: — the Government has commissioned two reviews of the pay of student nurses and midwives; — the first review on pay for placements during the Covid-19 pandemic was completed and its main recommendations were published on Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ) before the report itself
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Grave at Irish Orphanage May Hold 800 Children's Remains
    Mass grave at Irish orphanage may hold 800 children's remains SHAWN POGATCHNIK Associated Press Seattle Times 4 June 2014 Anyone looking for more information or to donate to the fund can contact Corless via email: [email protected] DUBLIN. The Catholic Church in Ireland is facing fresh accusations of child neglect after a researcher found records for 796 young children believed to be buried in a mass grave beside a former orphanage for the children of unwed mothers. The Catholic Church in Ireland is facing fresh accusations of child neglect after a researcher found records for 796 young children believed to be buried in a mass grave beside a former orphanage for the children of unwed mothers. The researcher, Catherine Corless, says her discovery of child death records at the Catholic nun-run home in Tuam, County Galway, suggests that a former septic tank filled with bones is the final resting place for most, if not all, of the children. Church leaders in Galway, western Ireland, said they had no idea so many children who died at the orphanage had been buried there, and said they would support local efforts to mark the spot with a plaque listing all 796 children. County Galway death records showed that the children, mostly babies and toddlers, died often of sickness or disease in the orphanage during the 35 years it operated from 1926 to 1961. The building, which had previously been a workhouse for homeless adults, was torn down decades ago to make way for new houses. A 1944 government inspection recorded evidence of malnutrition among some of the 271 children then living in the Tuam orphanage alongside 61 unwed mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of Micheál Mac Liammóir
    Leabharlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann National Library of Ireland Collection List No. 117 PAPERS OF MICHEÁL MAC LIAMMÓIR (MSS 41,246-41,340) Papers of the actor, stage designer, theatre director and author, Micheál Mac Liammóir, of the Gate Theatre, Dublin, which he founded with his partner, Hilton Edwards, in 1928. The collection comprises playscripts, essays, records of business, and personal and professional correspondence. Compiled by Máire Ní Chonalláin, 2005 Contents Introduction 5 Micheál Mac Liammóir 5 Provenance 5 Content and Structure 5 I Literary and autobiographical works by Mac Liammóir 7 I.i Scripts 7 I.i.1 Dancing Shadow 7 I.i.2 Diarmuid and Gráinne 7 I.i.3 Full Moon for the Bride 7 I.i.4 Gertie the Ghost of the Gate 7 I.i.5 Home for Christmas (or the Grand Tour) : a Masquerade 8 I.i.6 I Must be Talking to my Friends 8 I.i.7 Ill Met by Moonlight 8 I.i.8 The Importance of Being Oscar 9 I.i.9 Juliet in the Rain 10 I.i.10 The Mountains Look Different 11 I.i.11 Pageant of St. Patrick 11 I.i.12 Portrait of Miriam 12 I.i.13 Prelude in Kazbek Street 12 I.i.14 A Slipper for the Moon 12 I.i.15 The Speckledy Shawl 13 I.i.16 Talking about Yeats 13 I.i.17 Where Stars Walk 14 I.ii Autobiographical material 15 I.ii.1 All for Hecuba 15 I.ii.2 Actors in Two Lights / Aisteoiri faoi Dhá Sholas 15 I.iii Works in Irish 15 I.iv Miscellaneous writings 15 II Diaries and miscellaneous personal papers 16 III Works by others 17 III.i Adaptations of novels and other genres 17 III.ii Plays by others 18 IV Correspondence 19 IV.i Abbey Theatre and the National Theatre Society 19 IV.ii Ballets by Mac Liammóir 20 IV.iii Ballintubber Abbey 750 years celebrations 20 IV.iv Birthday cards: 70th birthday celebrations 21 2 IV.v “Bookings (and things concerning them)” 21 IV.v.1 Agents 21 IV.v.2 Theatre bookings 21 IV.v.3 Booking of actors 22 IV.vi British Council 22 IV.vii Broadcasting 22 IV.vii.1 A.B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Provision of Disability Services in Limerick 1930-1990 David
    The Provision of Disability Services in Limerick 1930-1990 David Loughnane Master of Arts History Mary Immaculate College University of Limerick Supervisor: Dr Maura Cronin External Examiner: Dr Laurence Geary Internal Examiner: Dr Una Ní Bhroiméil Submitted 26 July 2013 Contents Author’s Declaration: ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Disability and Language .................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Provision for Disability pre 1920 .................................................................... 20 Chapter 3: From religious orders to voluntary groups ....................................................... 30 Chapter 4: Background of the activists .............................................................................. 56 Chapter 5: From Day Centres to Schools ........................................................................... 73 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 87 Sources ............................................................................................................................... 92 Primary Sources .............................................................................................................. 92 Oral Interviews...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Inter-Departmental Group on Mother and Baby Homes
    Report of the Inter-Departmental Group on Mother and Baby Homes Department of Children and Youth Affairs July 2014 I. Introduction The Inter Departmental Group was set up in response to revelations and public controversy regarding conditions in Mother and Baby Homes. This controversy originally centred on the high rate of deaths at the Bon Secours Mother and Baby Home in Tuam, Co. Galway. A local historian, Ms Catherine Corless, sourced details from public records of 796 child deaths, very many of them infants, in this home in the period from 1925 to 1961. There was also considerable anxiety and questions as to the burial arrangements for these infants. Notwithstanding that Tuam was the original focus of this controversy, related issues of death rates, burial arrangements and general conditions have also been raised with regard to Mother and Baby Homes in other locations. Shortly after the Inter-Departmental Group was established, Dáil Eireann passed a motion, following a Government sponsored amendment, on 11th June 2014 as follows: “That Dáil Éireann: acknowledges the need to establish the facts regarding the deaths of almost 800 children at the Bon Secours Sisters institution in Tuam, County Galway between 1925 and 1961, including arrangements for the burial of these children; acknowledges that there is also a need to examine other "mother and baby homes" operational in the State in that era; recognises the plight of the mothers and children who were in these homes as a consequence of the failure of religious institutions, the State,
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Sight, out of Mind
    Out of Sight, Out of Mind The ‘Social Death’ of Institutionalized Women and Children and the ‘Social Amnesia’ of Irish Society in the Twentieth Century, Depicted in Forensic Evidence from the Children's Mass Grave at a former Mother and Baby Home in Tuam, Co. Galway. Figure 1 Picture taken at a Mother and Baby Home in Ireland (Brian Lockier/Adoption Rights Alliance). Cecilia Ahl Falkensjö Institutionen för historiska studier Göteborgs universitet Självständigt arbete fördjupningsnivå 15 hp HT 2020 Handledare: Bettina Schulz Paulsson 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... 3 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. PURPOSE OF PAPER ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3. THEORETICAL APPROACH .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. PREVIOUS
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Institutional Burials Bill Joint Submission 26.2.21
    JOINT SUBMISSION TO OIREACHTAS COMMITTEE ON CHILDREN, EQUALITY, DISABILITY AND INTEGRATION RE: GENERAL SCHEME OF A CERTAIN INSTITUTIONAL BURIALS (AUTHORISED INTERVENTIONS) BILL 26 February 2021 Authors Dr SArAh-Anne Buckley (Department of History, NUI Galway) Dr Vicky Conway (Dublin City University SChool of Law and Government) MáIréAd Enright (Reader, Birmingham Law SChool) FionnA Fox (Solicitor) Dr JAmes GAllen (Dublin City University SChool of Law and Government) ErIkA HAyes (Solicitor and LLM candidate, Irish Centre for Human Rights, School of Law, NUI Galway) Mary HArney (LLM International Human Rights, MA Irish Studies, MPhil (Hon), BA Human Ecology) DarrAgh MAckIn (Solicitor, Phoenix Law) ClAIre McGettrIck (Irish Research CounCil Post-Graduate ResearCh SCholar, SChool of SoCiology, University College Dublin) ConAll Ó FáthArtA (SChool of Journalism, NUI Galway) Dr MAeve O’Rourke (Irish Centre for Human Rights, SChool of Law, NUI Galway) Professor EmerItus PhIl ScrAton (SChool of Law, Queen’s University Belfast) Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. The Role of the Coroner 11 3. Recommended Amendments to the Bill 15 4. RelevAnt Facts 21 5. Ireland’s EuropeAn and InternAtionAl HumAn Rights ObligAtions 31 AppendIx 1: Tables of deAths, burIAls & dIsAppeArAnces from MBHCOI Report 38 AppendIx 2: Suggested witnesses to gIve evIdence After relAtIves And survIvors 60 1 INTRODUCTION If the Government wishes to Act urgently to meet the needs And legAl rights of the relatives of those who dIed And/or dIsAppeAred In InstItutionAl contexts, the Attorney GenerAl cAn – and must – order inquests immedIAtely under the Coroners Act 1962 (as Amended). Under this existIng legislatIon, inquests Are AlreAdy required At institutionAl sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Inter-Departmental Group on Mother and Baby Homes
    Report of the Inter-Departmental Group on Mother and Baby Homes Department of Children and Youth Affairs July 2014 I. Introduction The Inter Departmental Group was set up in response to revelations and public controversy regarding conditions in Mother and Baby Homes. This controversy originally centred on the high rate of deaths at the Bon Secours Mother and Baby Home in Tuam, Co. Galway. A local historian, Ms Catherine Corless, sourced details from public records of 796 child deaths, very many of them infants, in this home in the period from 1925 to 1961. There was also considerable anxiety and questions as to the burial arrangements for these infants. Notwithstanding that Tuam was the original focus of this controversy, related issues of death rates, burial arrangements and general conditions have also been raised with regard to Mother and Baby Homes in other locations. Shortly after the Inter-Departmental Group was established, Dáil Eireann passed a motion, following a Government sponsored amendment, on 11th June 2014 as follows: “That Dáil Éireann: acknowledges the need to establish the facts regarding the deaths of almost 800 children at the Bon Secours Sisters institution in Tuam, County Galway between 1925 and 1961, including arrangements for the burial of these children; acknowledges that there is also a need to examine other "mother and baby homes" operational in the State in that era; recognises the plight of the mothers and children who were in these homes as a consequence of the failure of religious institutions, the State,
    [Show full text]