<<

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 136, Number 9, September 2008, Pages 3035–3039 S 0002-9939(08)09327-1 Article electronically published on April 30, 2008

AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE LAW OF OVER FUNCTION FIELDS

CHUN-GANG JI AND YAN XUE

(Communicated by Wen-Ching Winnie Li)

Abstract. Let P and Q be relatively prime monic irreducible in Fq[T ](2 q). In this paper, we give an elementary proof for the following law of quadratic reciprocity in F [T ]: q Q P |P |−1 |Q|−1 =(−1) 2 2 , P Q Q where P is the .

1. Introduction

Let Fq be a finite field with q elements; for the sake of clarity we assume q is an odd prime power. Let Fq[T ] be the of polynomials in one variable over the finite field Fq. Every element in Fq[T ] has the form n n−1 f(T )=anT + an−1T + ···+ a1T + a0.

If an =0,wesaythat f has degree n, notationally deg(f)=n.Inthiscase,let F∗ sgn(f)=an and call this element of q the sign of f.Ifsgn(f)=1,wesaythatf is a monic . It is sometimes useful to define the sign of the zero polynomial deg(A) tobe0anditsdegreetobe−∞.LetA ∈ Fq[T ]. If A =0,set |A| = q .If A =0,set|A| =0. Let P be a monic in Fq[T ]andA ∈ Fq[T ]. We define the Legendre symbol as follows: ⎧ ⎨⎪1ifA is a nonzero modulo P, A = 0ifP divides A, P ⎩⎪ −1ifA is a nonzero quadratic nonresidue modulo P. Theorem (Quadratic ). Let P and Q be relatively prime monic irreducible polynomials in F [T ].Then q Q P |P |−1 |Q|−1 =(−1) 2 2 . P Q

Received by the editors July 6, 2007. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11R58; Secondary 11A15. Key words and phrases. Rational function fields, Legendre symbol, quadratic reciprocity law. The first author is partially supported by grants No. 10771103 and 10201013 from NNSF of China and Jiangsu planned projects for postdoctoral research funds.

c 2008 American Mathematical Society Reverts to public domain 28 years from publication 3035

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 3036 CHUN-GANG JI AND YAN XUE

Over the years, many authors have produced proofs of the law of quadratic reciprocity. In 1857, Dedekind [4] stated that quadratic reciprocity holds over function fields. This was proved later by Artin [1]. In [6], Merrill and Walling used their inversion formula of the polynomial theta function to give another proof. In [2], Carlitz proved a more general reciprocity law for function fields which includes Dedekind’s quadratic law as a special case. In another paper [3], Carlitz used the Carlitz exponential map to re-prove the polynomial reciprocity law. In [5], Keqin Feng and Linsheng Yin gave an elementary proof of the law of quadratic reciprocity in Fq[T ]. In this paper our main motivation is to prove the law of quadratic reciprocity over function fields in a more simple and direct way than others. We use purely number-theoretic tools, such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem.

2. Some lemmas

Lemma 1. Let P ∈ Fq[T ] be a monic irreducible polynomial and A ∈ Fq[T ] be a polynomial not divisible by P .Then

A|P |−1 ≡ 1(mod P ).

Proof. See M. Rosen [7, Corollary of Proposition 1.8]. 

Lemma 2. Let P ∈ Fq[T ] be a monic irreducible polynomial and A ∈ Fq[T ] be a polynomial not divisible by P . The congruence x2 ≡ A(mod P ) is solvable if and only if

|P |−1 A 2 ≡ 1(mod P ).

There are (|P |−1)/2 nonzero quadratic residues modulo P .

Proof. This is a special case of Proposition 1.10 in M. Rosen [7].  A Lemma 3. The Legendre symbol P has the following properties: ≡ A B (1) If A B(modP),then P = P ; AB A B (2) P = P P ; | |− A P 1 (3) If P A,then ≡ A 2 (mod P ); P ∗ |P |−1 ∈ F a ≡ 2 (4) If a q,then P a (mod P ). Proof. The first assertion follows immediately from the definition. The second and the third follow from the definition, Lemma 1, and Lemma 2. The fourth assertion is a special case of the third. 

Lemma 4. Let P ∈ Fq[T ] be a monic irreducible polynomial. Then f ≡−1(mod P ). 0≤deg(f)

Proof. See M. Rosen [7, Corollary 2 of Proposition 1.9]. 

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE LAW OF QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY 3037

3. The proof of the theorem

Let A ∈ Fq[T ] be a monic polynomial of degree greater than 0. Set

µ(A)={B ∈ Fq[T ] | 0 ≤ deg(B) < deg(A)}, { ∈ | ∈ F∗2} µ1(A)= B µ(A) sgn(B) q , { ∈ | ∈ F∗2} µ2(A)= B µ(A) sgn(B) q .

Then 1 1 #µ(A)=|A|−1, #µ (A)= (|A|−1), #µ (A)= (|A|−1). 1 2 2 2

Let P and Q be relatively prime monic irreducible polynomials in Fq[T ]. For each pair (M, N) ∈ µ(P )×µ1(Q), by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a unique KMN ∈ µ(PQ) satisfying KMN ≡ M(mod P ),

KMN ≡ N(mod Q).

In particular, (KMN,PQ)=1. Let (M, N)and(M1,N1) lie in µ(P ) × µ1(Q). If (M, N) =( M1,N1), then F∗ KMN = KM1N1 and KMN = gKM1N1 ,whereg is a generator of q .Onthe ≡ other hand, if KMN = gKM1N1 ,thenN gN1(mod Q). By deg(N)=deg(gN1) < deg(Q), we have N = gN1, which is a contradiction to the fact that N, N1 ∈ µ1(Q). If M ∈ µ(P ), N ∈ µ1(Q), set K if sgn(K ) ∈ F∗2, K∗ = MN MN q MN ∈ F∗2 gKMN if sgn(KMN) q . { ∗ | ∈ ∈ } Then KMN M µ(P ),N µ1(Q) denotes the set of all polynomials in µ1(PQ) which are relatively prime with PQ.So ∗ (1) KMN = A.

M∈µ(P ) A∈µ1(PQ) N∈µ1(Q) (A, P Q)=1

Let r denote the number of KMN which are in µ2(PQ). Then

∗ r (2) KMN = g KMN. M∈µ(P ) M∈µ(P ) N∈µ1(Q) N∈µ1(Q)

By (1) and (2), we have

r (3) A = g KMN.

A∈µ1(PQ) M∈µ(P ) (A, P Q)=1 N∈µ1(Q)

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 3038 CHUN-GANG JI AND YAN XUE

From A = A/ B,

A∈µ1(PQ) A∈µ1(PQ) B∈µ1(PQ) (A, P Q)=1 (A, P )=1 Q|B, (B, P)=1 |Q|−1 |Q|−1 A ≡ A · ( K) 2 ≡ A · (−1) 2 (mod P ) A∈µ (P ) K∈µ(P ) A∈µ (P ) A∈µ1(PQ) 1 1 (A, P )=1

and |P |−1 Q B ≡ (QA) ≡ Q 2 A ≡ A(mod P ), P ∈ ∈ ∈ B∈µ1(PQ) A µ1(P ) A µ1(P ) A µ1(P ) Q|B, (B, P)=1

we have |Q|−1 Q (4) A ≡ (−1) 2 (mod P ). P A∈µ1(PQ) (A, P Q)=1

Similarly, |P |−1 P (5) A ≡ (−1) 2 (mod Q). Q A∈µ1(PQ) (A, P Q)=1

On the other hand,

| |− | |− r r Q 1 r Q 1 (6) g KMN ≡ g ( M) 2 ≡ g (−1) 2 (mod P ), M∈µ(P ) M∈µ(P ) N∈µ1(Q) | |− | |− | |− r r 2 P 1 r − Q 1 P 1 g KMN ≡ g (( N) ) 2 ≡ g (g 2 N) 2 ∈ ∈ M∈µ(P ) N µ1(Q) N µ(Q) N∈µ1(Q) | |− | |− | |− r − Q 1 P 1 P 1 (7) ≡ g g 2 2 (−1) 2 (mod Q).

From (3), (4), (6), we have Q = gr. P From (3), (5), (7), we have | |− | |− P r − P 1 Q 1 = g g 2 2 . Q

Hence Q P − |P |−1 |Q|−1 |P |−1 |Q|−1 = g 2 2 =(−1) 2 2 . P Q This completes the proof of the theorem.

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE LAW OF QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY 3039

References

[1] E. Artin, Quadratische K¨orper im Gebiete der h¨oheren Kongruenzen, I, II,Math.Z.19 (1924), 153-246. MR1544651, MR1544652 [2] L. Carlitz, The arithmetic of polynomials in a Galois field, Amer. J. Math. 54 (1932), 39-50. MR1506871 [3] L. Carlitz, On certain functions connected with polynomials in a Galois field, Duke Math. J. 1 (1935), 137-168. MR1545872 [4] R. Dedekind, Abriss einer Theorie der h¨oheren Congruenzen in Bezug auf einer reellen Primzahl-Modulus, J. Reine Angew. Math. 54 (1857), 1-26. [5] Ke Qin Feng and Linsheng Yin, An elementary proof of the law of quadratic reciprocity in Fq(T ), Sichuan Daxue Xuebao, Special Issue 26 (1989), 36-40. MR1059674 (91i:11178) [6] K. D. Merrill and L. H. Walling, On quadratic reciprocity over function fields,PacificJ. Math. 173 (1996), 147-150. MR1387795 (97a:11011) [7] M. Rosen, in Function Fields, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 210, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. MR1876657 (2003d:11171)

Department of Mathematics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, People’s Republic of China E-mail address: [email protected] Department of Mathematics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, People’s Republic of China E-mail address: [email protected]

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use