DOCSLIB.ORG

5.3 Sustainable Urban Transport Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5.3 Sustainable Urban Transport Evaluation - Focusing on Korean Cases and its Practice - 1. Introduction of SUTE 1) What is SUTE? 2) What are components of SUTE? Korea government implements the Sustainable Urban Transport Evaluation(SUTE) annually since 2014 after 4-year pilot evaluation project by KOTI. Evaluation is implemented at the base of central government law. - Article 15 of ‘Promotional Law on the Sustainable Transport and Logistics System’ stipulates that central government should practice the evaluation on sustainability . Sustainable Transportation System is important to meet citizens’ demand of the current generation while not compromising those of future generations. 4 Sustainable Urban Transport Evaluation(SUTE) is composed of two parts. Evaluation on sustainable transportation system and Best Practice Contest Mandatory Voluntary Evaluation on Sustainable Best Practice Transportation System Contest (status+ policy) Incentive Enviro Econo A B C D Society nment my Group Group Group Group 5 Evaluation - Component : Status Evaluation + Policy Evaluation - Method : Evaluation by Group (mandatory) and based on indicators - Expectation: Central government obtains a clear assessment of status and policies of cities Local governments diagnoses and improves their transportation condition and policies Best Practice Contest - Purpose: Identify and share best practices(BP) to help city governments to build efficient transportation policies reflecting their conditions - Method : No By-group Evaluation, Incentives for Winners (voluntary) - Expectation: Discover, promote and spread successful and desirable practices Encourage city governments’ efforts to build sustainable transportation systems 6 2. Implementation of 2015 SUTE 1) Evaluation Target Cities 2) Evaluation Indicators 3) Evaluation Process 4) Best Practice Contest 74 Cities with a Population over 100,000 Four Groups Divided by Population Size and City Attributes - A Group: Special/Metropolitan Cities over 1 million (7 cities) - B Group: Urban Cities with a Population over 300,000 (10 cities) - C Group: Urban-rural Consolidated Cities with a Population over 300,000 (16 cities) - D Group: Cities with a Population less than 300,000 (41 cities) Cities with a Population over 300,000 Classification Special / Metropolitan Cities Urban-rural Consolidated Cities with a Population less than 300,000 Urban Cities Cities Group(No) A (7) B(10) C(16) D(41) Guri, Osan, Gunpo, Uiwang, Hanam, Icheon, Seoul(special city) Changwon, Yongin, Suwon, Bucheon, Anseong, Gwangju, Yangju, Pocheon, Chuncheon, Pyeongtaek, Gimpo, Gangneung, Chungju, Jecheon, Gongju, Boryeong, Seongnam, Siheung, Jeonju, Cities Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Pohang, Namyangju, Asan, Seosan, Nonsan, Dangjin, Gunsan, Jeongeup, Uijeongbu, Ansan, Anyang, Gwangju, Daejeon, Cheongju, Hwaseong, Mokpo, Yeosu, Suncheon, Gwanyang, Gyeongju, Gwangmyeong, Goyang Gimcheon, Andong, Yeongju, Yeongcheon, Sangju, Ulsan(metropolitan citiy) Wonju, Gimhae, Paju, etc etc 8 24 Indicators of Evaluation: 12 for Status evaluation + 12 for Policy evaluation Each Evaluation is composed of 3 sectors: Environmental, Social, Economic Status Evaluation is evaluating for status(and improvement) transport condition of cities - Status Evaluation Ratio: 60% (Status of this year 36% + Improvement compared to last year 24%) - Use reliable data such as KOSTAT(Korea Statistics) Policy Evaluation is evaluating efforts of local governments regarding sustainable transport - Policy Evaluation Ratio: 40% - Use the documents that are submitted by local government Evaluation Status Evaluation(12 Indicators, 60%) Policy Evaluation(12 Indicators, 40%) Environment Society Economy Environment Society Economy 4 Indicators 4 Indicators 4 Indicators 4 Indicators 4 Indicators 4 Indicators 9 1) Status Evaluation: the list of 12 indicators - Environmental sector is a group of indicators for evaluating status regarding reduction on CO2 emissions and securing for clean air - Social sector is a set for evaluating status of transport system’s safety and livelihood - Economic sector is a set for evaluating status of reduction on transport cost and reinforcing transport system competitiveness Classification Indicator . CO2 Emissions of Car per capita Environ- Reduction on CO2 Emissions . CO2 Emissions divided by population and area mental . CO2 Emissions per GRDP Securing for Clean Air . Air Pollutants Emissions per capita . Road Traffic Accident Fatalities divided by population and cars Status Safety Transport System . Transport Culture Index Evaluation Social (60%) Transport System for . Accessibility of public transportation Livelihood-Connected service . Modal share of Green-transport(bicycle+walk) Reduction on social . Road Congestion Cost per capita transport cost . Modal share of public transport Economic Reinforcing Transport System . Average Travel Time per capita Competitiveness . The results of Satisfaction Survey of public transport 10 1) Status Evaluation: the methodology and sources of indicators 11 2) Policy Evaluation: the list of 12 indicators - Environmental sector is set for evaluating policy efforts for supply of environmental-friendly vehicle and reinforcing transport demand management - Social sector is set for evaluating policy efforts for improving safety and transport equity and encouraging use of Non-motorized vehicle - Economic sector is set for evaluating policy efforts for improving infrastructure and transportation system efficiently Classification Indicator Supply of environmental- . Policy efforts for reducing CO2 emissions and air pollutants Environ- friendly vehicle . Policy efforts for supplying environmental-friendly cars mental Reinforcing transport . Policy efforts for reducing users of cars demand management . Policy efforts for parking demand management Improving Safety and . Policy efforts for the handicapped Policy Equity . Policy efforts for improving transport safety Evaluation Social . Policy efforts for pedestrians (40%) Non-motorized vehicle . Policy efforts for bicycle-users . Policy efforts for improving public transport competitiveness Infrastructure Improvement . Policy efforts for encouraging transfer fare and supplying BIS system etc. Economic Efficient Transportation . Policy efforts for improving transport connection such as Transfer-terminals System . Policy efforts for governance effort between adjacent cities and central government 12 2) Policy Evaluation (40%) 13 3) Differentiated Adoption of Indicators according to groups - To better reflect each city’s characteristics: A Group(24), B&C Groups (19), D Group (14) 14 1. Status Evaluation - Evaluation organization: KOTI - Data from KOSTAT, KTDB and etc. - Status Evaluation : 60%/Total (Status 36% + Improvement 24%) - Normalization of the score (Average Score: 70) - Relative Evaluation 2. Policy Evaluation - Evaluation organization: Special Evaluation Committee(12 members) - Policy Evaluation: 40%/Total - Each Committee member assigned with each indicator gives scores - Score: 100pt Scale with 5pt Interval(Average Score: 70) 15 3. Weighing of Each Indicator (set by Evaluation Committee) 16 4. Final Result 1st Combine Status(based on data) and Policy Evaluation Scores (convert the combined score into a 100pt-scale score with 70 average) 2nd Calculate Weighing-adjusted Score 3th Final Ranking and Grade (based on a city’s location within standard normal distribution) 4th Reward Awards and Incentives for Excellent Cities <Table> Indicators with High Weighing Evaluation Indicators with Most Weighing (Low) (Mean) (High) Status Average Traffic Fatalities Per Capita and Car Bad Good Policy Pedestrian-friendliness Very Bad Very Good <Table>Standard Normal Distribution for Ranking 17 - Newly introduced in 2015 - Discover, promote, and spread best policies of successful city governments - Make policies more sustainable by promoting cities’ participation in the Contest - Extra Points to Status and Policy Evaluation Score for All Winning Local Government (two points at most, or an exemption from the bottom place) - Rewards and Marketing Opportunities for the 1st Prize Winner Best Practice Contest The 2015 SUTE Two Extra Points for 5 Cities with Winning Cities Outstanding cases Evaluation based on the indicators 18 3. Results of SUTE 2015 1) Evaluation Result 2) Best Practice Contest Result 3) Incentives 4) The Way Forward <Table> SUTE 2015 Results Total Numbers Group A B C D of cities Top- Sun- Seoul Suwon Yongin ranking cheon 4 Jecheon Top Uijeong Chang- Busan Seoguip 10% bu won 5 o Top 25% - 1 2 6 9 Top 95% 4 6 11 30 51 Bottom 5% 1 1 1 2 5 Excellent Good Normal Total* 7 10 16 41 74 Bad 20 Selection of 5 Best Policies Public Transport-friendly Busan A Policy Package Containing 12 Priorities Promote the Use of Public Transportation PPP for Building Rest Area, and Common Garage for Freight Traffic Address local Complaint and Ease Traffic by Offering Rest Area and Garage for Freight Traffic IT-PLUS Process for Transport Administration Reduce Administrative Work by Using Mobile Platform to Issue Parking Tickets Address Local Complaint Intra-bus Discount Program for Baseball Stadium Visitors Ease the Traffic Surrounding the Stadium by Subsidizing Trips to the Stadium 0.1$ Taxi Secure Transportation to Bus Stations for Remote Areas 21 Guideline on Incentives - Incentives will be given to the cities which made it to the top, top10% top 25% or cities who won the BP Award - Incentive rewarding can be repeated for the cities which won more than one prize - 1 billion won (1 million dollars) were distributed to the 20 cities out of 75 1st Prize Top-ranking Cities (4) 2nd Prize Cities at the Top 10% (5) 3rd Prize Cities at the Top 25% or Higher(9) BP Award Cities Which Won the BP Awards(5) 22 - Korea cases will be a good example for ‘Green and Sustainable Transportation System’ - A Need for Proactive Response to the global climate change * Rio Summit(1992) → Kyoto Protocol(1997) →COP21(2015) - SUTE facilitates and promotes evaluation on the transport systems of local government - SUTE will upgrade Korea’s green transport industries 23 Thank you !! .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Woongjin Group Files for Bankruptcy October, 2012 Makoto, ABE (Seoul, Research Fellow Sent Abroad, IDE-JETRO)
    http://www.ide.go.jp A Corporate Business Leader’s Unfulfilled Ambitions to Build a Major Conglomerate —The Woongjin Group Files for Bankruptcy October, 2012 Makoto, ABE (Seoul, Research Fellow Sent Abroad, IDE-JETRO) Foreword The Woongjin Group, which ranked 39th in terms of assets in corporate South Korea, has effectively filed for bankruptcy. In terms of asset scale, the Woongjin Group has less than 5% of the amount of assets held by the Samsung Group. Nonetheless, the Woongjin Group’s bankruptcy filing is sending ripples throughout South Korean society for two main reasons. First, it is South Korea’s first major bankruptcy since the economy abruptly stalled at the start of 2012. Second, the Woongjin Group is one of only a few mid-tier to large South Korean industrial groups that have reached their current position under the leadership of the current owner in a single generation. In this report, we retrace the steps of the Woongjin Group, from its growth to collapse. A Company Founded by a Top Salesman Yoon Seok-keum, founder of the Woongjin Group, was born in 1945 as the child of an impoverished farming family in Gongju City, South Chungcheong Province, South Korea. After graduating from the College of Commerce and Economics of Konkuk University, Mr. Yoon joined Korea Britannica Corporation in 1971 as a salesman. Here, Mr. Yoon became No.1 in domestic sales just one month after joining the firm, and in his first year received an award given to Britannica’s highest-performing salesperson out of all 54 countries where the company does business worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Gongju City
    대한민국 Republic of Korea 유네스코 선정도시 백제 역사가 깊은 공주시 Gongju City, selected by UNESCO for the history of Baekje dynasty 이미지 출처 : 국립중앙박물관 공주대학교 Kongju National University Program Introduction ▶ Korean Language and Cultural Experience Program Duration : 9 nights and 10 days ▶ Students will be introduced to the Korean language and culture through the program based on experience and learning. ▶ Credit will be given to the participant. Application Requirements 1. Application 5. Letter of Recommendation from Home University 2. Certificate of Enrollment 6. Copy of Passport 3. Official Transcript 7. Certificate of Health 4. Curriculum Vitae 8. Photo (4cm long and 3cm wide) ※ All the application documents must be approved and sent via the applicant’s home university. Gongju City Seoul Seoul Gongju 1hour 30minutes by bus SOUTH KOREA Gongju Incheon Gongju 2 hours by bus Airport Field Trip 전주 한옥마을 부여 Jeonju Hanok Village Buyeo Baekje Cultural Land 용인 한국민속촌 서울: 인사동, 명동, 경복궁 Yongin Korean Folk Village Seoul: Insadong, Myeongdong, Gyeongbokgung Palace Cultural Experience Ceramic Making Hanbok / Traditional Courtesy Korean Language and Cultural Experience Program Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Orientation & Korean Korean Korean AM Welcoming Language Language Language 9:00~11:35 Ceremony Lecture Lecture Lecture Cultural Cultural Arrival Cultural Cultural Experience : Experience : PM Incheon Experience: Experience : Hanbok and Traditional 13:00~16:30 Airport Calligraphy Taekwondo Traditional Paper Art Courtesy Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 *Field Trip* Gongju
    [Show full text]
  • Aloha Korea Tour
    Orient Travel Inc. 745 Keeaumoku St., #202 Honolulu, HI 96814 ! ! ! ALOHA KOREA TOUR - 6N/8D! - Guided by David Lim DAY Schedule Meal HOTEL D1 Honolulu International Airport L, D - Served in Flight WED Meet at airport by 9:30am Asiana Airlines OZ231 Departing 11:40am NON-STOP D2 Arriving 4:20pm at Incheon Int’l Airport D - Bulgogi Manu Hotel OR THU Depart to Seoul similar Hotel Check-in Free Time D3 Gangnam Hallyu Center B - Hotel Buffet Gunsan Best FRI Samsung D’light L - Steamed Chicken Western OR similar Depart to Gunsan D - Ssambap Gunsan Fish Market Buan Beach Saemangeum - World’s Longest Seawall Hotel Checkin D4 Depart to Jeonju B - Hotel Buffet Jeonju Rivera Hotel SAT Hanji paper making L - Bibimbap OR similar Taekwondo performance D - Jeonju Tradtional Korean drum experience Dinner Traditional Hanok Village - Hotel Checkin D5 Hotel Checkout B - Bean-sprout Soup Manu Hotel OR SUN Jinahn Maisan Temple L - Kalbi Soup similar Depart to Suwon D - Pork Belly KBS Suwon Drama Set Han River cruise Hotel Check-in D6 N. Seoul Tower B - Hotel Buffet Manu Hotel OR MON Gwanghwamun Square L - Black bean Sauce similar Cheonggyecheon Stream Noodle Blue House D - Ssamgaetang Gyeongbokgung Palace (Chicken Stew) Live Show - Nanta OR similar D7 Free Day OR Shopping B - Hotel Buffet Manu Hotel OR TUE Insadong L - Tonkatsu similar Myeongdong Market D - Beef Yakiniku Itaewon Market TENT BAR - Tour members party D8 Hotel Checkout B - Hotel Buffet WED DMZ Area Tour L - Roast Duck Imjinkak/Dorasan Station/The 3rd Tunnel D - At the airport Incheon International Airport Asiana Airlines OZ232 8:00pm - 10:10am NON-STOP Arrival at Honolulu Int’l Airport Itinerary subject to change due to weather, traffic and unforeseen circumstances Office: (808) 944-3822 Fax: (808) 944-4680 Email: [email protected] Orient Travel Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Lines in Gyeonggi-Do & Seoul Metropolitan Area
    Gyeongchun line Metro Lines in Gyeonggi-do & Seoul Metropolitan Area Hoeryong Uijeongbu Ganeung Nogyang Yangju Deokgye Deokjeong Jihaeng DongducheonBosan Jungang DongducheonSoyosan Chuncheon Mangwolsa 1 Starting Point Destination Dobongsan 7 Namchuncheon Jangam Dobong Suraksan Gimyujeong Musan Paju Wollong GeumchonGeumneungUnjeong TanhyeonIlsan Banghak Madeul Sanggye Danngogae Gyeongui line Pungsan Gireum Nowon 4 Gangchon 6 Sungshin Baengma Mia Women’s Univ. Suyu Nokcheon Junggye Changdong Baekgyang-ri Dokbawi Ssangmun Goksan Miasamgeori Wolgye Hagye Daehwa Juyeop Jeongbalsan Madu Baekseok Hwajeong Wondang Samsong Jichuk Gupabal Yeonsinnae Bulgwang Nokbeon Hongje Muakjae Hansung Univ. Kwangwoon Gulbongsan Univ. Gongneung 3 Dongnimmun Hwarangdae Bonghwasan Sinnae (not open) Daegok Anam Korea Univ. Wolgok Sangwolgok Dolgoji Taereung Bomun 6 Hangang River Gusan Yeokchon Gyeongbokgung Seokgye Gapyeong Neunggok Hyehwa Sinmun Meokgol Airport line Eungam Anguk Changsin Jongno Hankuk Univ. Junghwa 9 5 of Foreign Studies Haengsin Gwanghwamun 3(sam)-ga Jongno 5(o)-gu Sinseol-dong Jegi-dong Cheongnyangni Incheon Saejeol Int’l Airport Galmae Byeollae Sareung Maseok Dongdaemun Dongmyo Sangbong Toegyewon Geumgok Pyeongnae Sangcheon Banghwa Hoegi Mangu Hopyeong Daeseong-ri Hwajeon Jonggak Yongdu Cheong Pyeong Incheon Int’l Airport Jeungsan Myeonmok Seodaemun Cargo Terminal Gaehwa Gaehwasan Susaek Digital Media City Sindap Gajwa Sagajeong Dongdaemun Guri Sinchon Dosim Unseo Ahyeon Euljiro Euljiro Euljiro History&Culture Park Donong Deokso Paldang Ungilsan Yangsu Chungjeongno City Hall 3(sa)-ga 3(sa)-ga Yangwon Yangjeong World Cup 4(sa)-ga Sindang Yongmasan Gyeyang Gimpo Int’l Airport Stadium Sinwon Airprot Market Sinbanghwa Ewha Womans Geomam Univ. Sangwangsimni Magoknaru Junggok Hangang River Mapo-gu Sinchon Aeogae Dapsimni Songjeong Office Chungmuro Gunja Guksu Seoul Station Cheonggu 5 Yangcheon Hongik Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiological Investigation on FMD Outbreaks in Republic
    Epidemiological investigation on FMD outbreaks in Republic of Korea Wooseog Jeong Ph.D. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency What is FMD in South Korea? Economical impact Million $ 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 - Mar-01 May-02 Jan-10 Apr-10 Nov-10 Jul-14 Dec-14 Ring Vaccination Stamping out Nationwide Vaccination Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency 2 2. FMD outbreaks in South Korea ▪ FMD Outbreaks from 2000 to 2011 in South Korea 2010 2014 2016 2017 2000 2002 Jan. Apr. Nov. Jul Dec 3.24. – 5. 1.2. – ’10.11.28 – ’14.12.3.~ 1.11~13. 4.8. – 5.6. 7.23~8.6 2.5 ~ 2.13.(O) Period 4.15. 2. – 6.23. 1.29 ’11. 4.21. ’15.4.28 2.17~3.29 (29 days) (15 days) 2.8 (A) (23 days) (53 days) (28 days) (145 days) (147 days) (147 days) No. of 8(O) 15 16 6 11 153 3 185 21 Reports 1(A) 2(O) Province 3 2 1 4 11 2 7 3 1(A) O O (MESA, Virus O (Pan O (SEA O O O (Pan Asia A O (SEA O1) Ind2001) Type Asia O1) O1) (SEA) (SEA) (Mya 98) O1) A (Asia/Sea97) (O) 1,113 182 162 395 55 herds 6,241 herds 172,798 herds 19 herds herds herds 2,009 herds 33,073 herds Culling 5,956 3 Million herds Cases 2,216 160,155 49,874 3 Cases 26 Cases Cases Cases 196 Cases (A) 100 herds Cases Cases Cases 1 Case Animal and Plant Ring Quarantine Agency Vaccinati Nationwide Nationwide Nationwide Nationwide Nationwide Vaccinati None None None on Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination on 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing the Right Location Page 1 of 4 Choosing the Right Location
    Choosing The Right Location Page 1 of 4 Choosing The Right Location Geography The Korean Peninsula lies in the north-eastern part of the Asian continent. It is bordered to the north by Russia and China, to the east by the East Sea and Japan, and to the west by the Yellow Sea. In addition to the mainland, South Korea comprises around 3,200 islands. At 99,313 sq km, the country is slightly larger than Austria. It has one of the highest population densities in the world, after Bangladesh and Taiwan, with more than 50% of its population living in the country’s six largest cities. Korea has a history spanning 5,000 years and you will find evidence of its rich and varied heritage in the many temples, palaces and city gates. These sit alongside contemporary architecture that reflects the growing economic importance of South Korea as an industrialised nation. In 1948, Korea divided into North Korea and South Korea. North Korea was allied to the, then, USSR and South Korea to the USA. The divide between the two countries at Panmunjom is one of the world’s most heavily fortified frontiers. Copyright © 2013 IMA Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Generated from http://www.southkorea.doingbusinessguide.co.uk/the-guide/choosing-the-right- location/ Tuesday, September 28, 2021 Choosing The Right Location Page 2 of 4 Surrounded on three sides by the ocean, it is easy to see how South Korea became a world leader in shipbuilding. Climate South Korea has a temperate climate, with four distinct seasons. Spring, from late March to May, is warm, while summer, from June to early September is hot and humid.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Korea Hoeyang Lake
    1 1 1 1 1 2 S2 unchon 2 2 2 5 6 7 8 9 ? Sukchon ? Sinchang-ni ? ? ? Pyongwon Sunan Okpyong-ni Songchon National Capital Kangdong Yangdok Yangdog-up Wonsan Pyongyang Provincial Capital ? City, town ? 9 Sungho-dong 9 3 Major Airport 3 Roads Chunghwa Nampo Democratic People's Railroad Songnim River Hwangju Republic of Korea Hoeyang Lake Anag-up International Boundary Anak Sariwon Demarcation Line Hungsu-ri Pyonggang Sinchon Chaeryong Sinmak Provincial Boundary Changyon 0 5 10 20 30 40 Ayang-ni Kilometers Miles Haeju 0 4 8 16 24 32 ? ? 8 Kaesong 8 3 Pyoksong 3 Dongducheon Ongjin Chuncheon SEA OF Sigyo-ri Gangneung Euijeongbu JAPAN Hongcheon Seoul KANG-WON-DO Mugho Bucheon SEOUL Samcheog Incheon Hoengseon Anyang KYONGGI-DO INCHON Weonju Jeongseon Suweon Jecheon Osan Yeongweol Chechon ? Pyeongtaeg Jungju ? 7 7 3 3 Eumseong Chungju CHUNGCHONGBUK-DO Cheonan Yeongju Oncheon-ri CHUNGCHONGNAM-DO Yeongyang Yesar Jeoneui Cheongju Hongseong Jeomchon Yecheon Cwangcheon Hamchang Andong Yeonghae TAEJON KYONGSANGBUK-DO Gongju Sangju Yeongdeog Daecheon Daejeon Euiseong Gyuam Buyeo Ogcheon Nonsan Seonsan Gunwi Ganggyeong Yeanmudae Yeongdong Gimcheon Seocheon Gumi Jacheon Pohang ? Geumsan Yangmog ? 6 6 3 Janghang 3 YELLOW SEA Muju Yeongcheon Kunsan Gunsan TAEGU Samnye Taegu Hayang RJeoenjupublic of KoreaDaegu Gyeongsan Gyeongju Gimje Jinan Janggye Geochang Goryeong CHOLLABUK-DO Hyeopung Cheongdo Aneui Ulsan Byeongyeong Hahcheon Changyeong Eonyang Hamyang Miryang Bangeojin Sancheong Gimhae Yangsan KWANGJU KYONGSANGNAM-DO Gupo Jinju Masan Kwangju Jinhae Pusan Sacheon Ungcheon ? Naju Chinhae ? 5 5 3 Goseong PUSAN 3 Yeongsanpo Suncheon CHOLLANAM-DO Samcheongpo Mogpo KOREA STRAIGHT Yeongam Beqlgyo Namhae Byeongyeong Yeosu Gangjin Jangheung Haenam Jindo ? ? 4 4 3 3 Repu blic Cheju Jeju of Korea Seogwipo Moseulpo Maetsuyoshi CHEJU-DO ? JAPAN ? 3 3 3 3 REPUBLIC OF KOREA Fukue Tomie ? ? ? ? ? 5 6 7 8 9 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Liquide Korea Carries out Facility Improvement at a Community Child Center in Cheonan
    PRESS RELEASE Seoul, 28 May 2015 Air Liquide Korea carries out facility improvement at a Community Child Center in Cheonan On May 27, Air Liquide Korea, the world leader in gases, technologies and services for Industry and Health, carried out a ‘Safe Day’ program at a community child center located in Dongnam-gu, Cheonan as a part of its ‘Act for Clean and Safe Community’ efforts. During the day-long Safe Day, employees from Air Liquide Korea’s Cheonan facility participated in renovating the center as well as sharing recreational time with the children, including making helium balloons. This year’s Safe Day focused on the safety of the children, including safety instructor and company volunteers teaching the youngsters about safety in everyday life. The volunteers focused on sharing safety rules at playgrounds and homes. Air Liquide Korea also inspected several other community child centers in Cheonan to assess their gas, electrical equipment, and fire safety equipment and selected the community child center for immediate improvements and repairs. This is the second Safe Day hosted by the company during 2015, following an earlier Safe Day held in Seoul. Christopher Clark, CEO of Air Liquide Korea, commented: “Following on from last year, Air Liquide Korea is proud to continue supporting community child centers by improving their facilities. It is a pleasure for us to join hands in improving the environment, welfare and safety of the children – as well as sharing safety knowledge -- at this community center.” The Safe Day program is a social contribution activity carried out since 2014 by Air Liquide Korea in collaboration with the Korea Association of the Community Child Centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Details of the Support Centers for Foreign Workers in the Republic of Korea Name of the Center Region Tel
    Contact details of the Support Centers for Foreign Workers in the Republic of Korea Name of the Center Region Tel. Shelter facilities Seoul Migrant Workers Center Seoul 02-3672-9472 ✓ Seoul Migrant Workers House/Korean Chinese Seoul 02-863-6622 ✓ House Sungdong Migrant Workers Center Seoul 02-2282-7974 Elim Mission Center Seoul 02-796-0170 Association for Foreign Migrant Workers Human Seoul 02-795-5504 Rights Yongsan Nanum House Seoul 02-718-9986 ✓ Won Buddism Seoul Foregin Center for Migrant Seoul 02-2699-9943 Workers Migrant Workers Welfare Society Seoul 02-858-4115 With community Migrant Center Gangwon 070-7521-8097 ✓ Osan Migrant Workers Center Osan 031-372-9301 ✓ Pyeongtek Migrant workers Center Pyeongtaek 031-652-8855 ✓ Bucheong Migrant Workers Center Wonmi 032-654-0664 ✓ Korea Migration Foundation Gwanju 031-797-2688 ✓ Cathalic Diocese of Ujeongbu Executive Center Guri 031-566-1142 ✓ EXODUS Gimpo Immigration Center Gimpo 031-982-7661 Anyang immigration Center Anyang 031-441-8502 ✓ Ansan Foreign Workers Support Center 031-4750-111 Ansan Foreign Workers house Ansan 031-495-2288 ✓ Kyungdong Presbyterian Church Pohan 054-291-0191 ✓ Catholic Diocese of Masan Migrant Committee Changwon 055-275-8203 Immigration center Changwon Gumi Maha Migrant Center Gumi 052-458-0755 Sungnam Migrant Workers House/Korean- Kyunggi ,Sung 031-756-2143 Chinese House nam Foreign Workers Cultural Center Gwangju 062-943-8930 ✓ Catholic Social welfare immigrants Pastoral in Gwangju 062-954-8003 ✓ Gwanju Gwnagju Migrant Workers Center Gwangju 062-971-0078 Daejeong
    [Show full text]
  • GS Energy Brochure Download
    Company Introduction COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED GS Energy Profile p.03 Subsidiaries p.04 Business Portfolio Refining & Petrochemicals p.05 Gas & Power p.07 Exploration & Production p.12 Green Growth p.14 GS Energy R&D Center p.18 Financial Information p.19 Contact Us p.20 History p.21 COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED Corporate Profile GS Energy was incorporated on January 3, 2012 as a result of GS Holdings’ spinoff of GS Caltex, its refining, marketing, chemicals and transportation arm, creating a new independent Korean energy company. Subsequently, GS Energy assumed the high growth businesses previously operated by GS Caltex including, exploration & production and renewable energy operations. Further, by acquiring GS Caltex’s electric & gas utilities operations, GS Energy has solidified its position as an integrated energy-specialized holding company. Value chain integration and operational agility are fundamental to GS Energy’s long term growth strategy. GS Energy is organized into four interrelated segments: Exploration & Production, Refining & Petrochemicals, Gas & Power and Green Growth. Our integrated business model allows us to capture synergies among our different segments and activities. Our upstream businesses include the development of oil & gas projects across the globe, from the Middle East to the Americas and Southeast Asia. Further downstream, GS Energy is currently constructing a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in South Chungcheong Province to optimize value chain integration and to ultimately provide a steady flow of electric power and gas to customers through various subsidiaries and affiliates. Furthermore, given our focus on sustainable growth, we have been actively developing our technical know-how in the alternative energy sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Measures in South Korea
    Air Quality Measures South Korea 2016.12 Ministry of Environment Current Air Quality Status in South Korea Ministry of Environment Current Air Quality Status in South Korea According to NASA Satellite Air Quality Map*, South Korea is one of the most concerned countries regarding air pollution (averaged over 2014). * Its major index is NOx mostly caused by power plants and automobiles. Source: NASA Source: NASA Current Air Quality Status in South Korea Transboundary particles Influence from Neighboring Countries exacerbate Korea’s PM concentrations (Source: OECD performance review draft) For an high concentration episode (24 Feb 2014), the contribution rate of neighboring countries was analyzed as 51.94%(Source: KOSAE) * Besides, high population density and rapid industrialization led high density of fine dust Source: Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment(KOSAE) Current Air Quality Status in South Korea In terms of premature deaths caused by outdoor air pollution, South Korea is one the vulnerable countries. Premature Deaths from Outdoor Air Pollution(Unit: deaths per 100,000 capita) 80 70 76 60 50 40 49 30 33 20 23 24 10 17 12 0 Korea Japan China India USA Germany France Source: WHO(2016), Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment ofSource: exposure NASA and burden of disease Source Analysis on PM2.5 Ministry of Environment Source Analysis on PM2.5 With aggravating air pollution, Korea puts an high importance on clear cause analysis (domestic sources + influence from other countries) in preparing actions to improve its aggravating air quality. • Domestic polluting-sources Baecknyeongdo Emission statistics Seoul Super-Sites (Intensive monitoring station network) Daejeon Based on the dedicated information Ulsan above, secondary formation and Gwangju contribution rate of each local part are also reflected in preparing actions.
    [Show full text]