DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2108.11908V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 26 Aug 2021 29Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2108.11908V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 26 Aug 2021 29Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St Draft version August 27, 2021 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 Final Targeting Strategy for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2S Survey Felipe A. Santana,1 Rachael L. Beaton,2, 3, ∗ Kevin R. Covey,4 Julia E. O'Connell,5 Penelope´ Longa-Pena,~ 6 Roger Cohen,7 Jose´ G. Fernandez-Trincado,´ 8 Christian R. Hayes,9 Gail Zasowski,10 Jennifer S. Sobeck,9 Steven R. Majewski,11 S. D. Chojnowski,12, 13 Nathan De Lee,14, 15 Ryan J. Oelkers,15 Guy S. Stringfellow,16 Andres´ Almeida,17 Borja Anguiano,11, 18 John Donor,19 Peter M. Frinchaboy,19 Sten Hasselquist,10, 20 Jennifer A. Johnson,21 Juna A. Kollmeier,3 David L. Nidever,13 Adrian. M. Price-Whelan,22 Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada,23, 24 Mathias Schultheis,25 Matthew Shetrone,26 Joshua D. Simon,3 Conny Aerts,27 Jura Borissova,28, 24 Maria R. Drout,3, 29 Doug Geisler,5, 17, 30 C.Y. Law,31, 32 Nicolas Medina,28, 33 Dante Minniti,34, 35 Antonela Monachesi,17, 30 Ricardo R. Munoz,~ 1 Rados law Poleski,36, 21 Alexandre Roman-Lopes,30 Kevin C. Schlaufman,37 Amelia M. Stutz,5 Johanna Teske,38, y Andrew Tkachenko,27 Jennifer L. Van Saders,39 Alycia Weinberger,38 and Manuela Zoccali24, 40 1Departamento de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago 2Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544 3The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101 4Department of Physics & Astronomy, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, 98225, USA 5Departamento de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Concepci´on,Casilla 160-C, Concepci´on,Chile 6Unidad de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Antofagasta, Avenida Angamos 601, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile 7Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA 8Instituto de Astronom´ıa y Ciencias Planetarias, Universidad de Atacama, Copayapu 485, Copiap´o,Chile 9Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA 10Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA 11Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA 12Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88001, USA 13Department of Physics, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173840, Bozeman, MT 59717-3840, USA 14Department of Physics, Geology, and Engineering Technology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA 15Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA 16Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA 17Instituto de Investigaci´onMultidisciplinario en Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa,Universidad de La Serena. Avenida Ra´ulBitr´anS/N, La Serena, Chile 18Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, NSW 2109, Australia 19Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA 20NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow 21Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA 22Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10010, USA 23Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicu~naMackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile 24Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Av. Vicu~na Mackenna 4860, 782-0436, Macul, Santiago, Chile 25Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, Lagrange Boulevard de l'Observatoire 06304 Nice, France 26University of California Observatories, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 27Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium 28Instituto de F´ısica y Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Valpara´ıso,Av. Gran Breta~na1111, Playa Ancha, Casilla 5030, Chile. arXiv:2108.11908v1 [astro-ph.GA] 26 Aug 2021 29Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H4 Canada 30Departamento de Astronomia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena. Av. Juan Cisternas 1200, La Serena, Chile 31Department of Space, Earth & Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden 32Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR 33Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), Santiago, Chile. 34Departamento de Ciencias F´ısicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Andr´esBello, Fern´andezConcha 700, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 35Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, V-00120, Italy Corresponding author: Felipe A. Santana [email protected] 2 Santana et al. 36Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland 37Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 38Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5241 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015, USAz 39Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai'i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 40Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicu~naMackenna 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Santiago, Chile ABSTRACT APOGEE is a high-resolution (R ∼ 22; 000), near-infrared, multi-epoch, spectroscopic survey of the Milky Way. The second generation of the APOGEE project, APOGEE-2, includes an expansion of the survey to the Southern Hemisphere called APOGEE-2S. This expansion enabled APOGEE to perform a fully panoramic mapping of all the main regions of the Milky Way; in particular, by operating in the H-band, APOGEE is uniquely able to probe the dust-hidden inner regions of the Milky Way that are best accessed from the Southern Hemisphere. In this paper we present the targeting strategy of APOGEE-2S, with special attention to documenting modifications to the original, previously published plan. The motivation for these changes is explained as well as an assessment of their effectiveness in achieving their intended scientific objective. In anticipation of this being the last paper detailing APOGEE targeting, we present an accounting of all such information complete through the end of the APOGEE-2S project; this includes several main survey programs dedicated to exploration of major stellar populations and regions of the Milky Way, as well as a full list of programs contributing to the APOGEE database through allocations of observing time by the Chilean National Time Allocation Committee (CNTAC) and the Carnegie Institution for Science (CIS). This work was presented along with a companion article, R. Beaton et al. (submitted; AAS29028), presenting the final target selection strategy adopted for APOGEE-2 in the Northern Hemisphere. Keywords: Astronomical Databases { Galaxy abundances { Galaxy dynamics { Galaxy evolution { Galaxy formation { Galaxy kinematics { Galaxy stellar content { Galaxy structure { Milky Way Galaxy { Surveys 1. INTRODUCTION Detailed analyses of the different substructures of the Milky Way and the physical processes that govern their interplay require high precision, homogeneous, large data samples covering all of its main regions. In that sense, modern photometric surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) or the Two Micron All- Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006) have been key to expanding our knowledge about our Milky Way. The remarkable discoveries enabled by these SDSS and 2MASS imaging include: (i) a large population of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies and low luminosity star clusters (Belokurov et al. 2007; Koposov et al. 2007; Belokurov et al. 2010), (ii) constraints on the morphology of both the stellar and dark matter halo (e.g., Majewski et al. 2003; Helmi 2004; Johnston et al. 2005; Law et al. 2005; Belokurov et al. 2006; Juri´cet al. 2008; Law & Majewski 2010; Deg & Widrow 2013), (iii) tidal tails from both disrupting star clusters and Milky Way satellite galaxies (e.g., Ivezi´cet al. 2000; Odenkirchen et al. 2001; Newberg et al. 2002; Majewski et al. 2003; Grillmair & Johnson 2006; Grillmair & Dionatos 2006; Grillmair 2009), (iv) multiple stellar populations in globular clusters (e.g., Lardo et al. 2011; Gratton et al. 2012), and (v) the characterization of complex substructures in the bulge/bar association using red clump stars (e.g., McWilliam & Zoccali 2010; Saito et al. 2011; Wegg et al. 2015). Despite the importance of photometric surveys in addressing these topics, full chemo-dynamical models of the Milky Way require input from precise and large-scale spectroscopic datasets. In this sense, a large number of recent spectro- scopic Galactic surveys have enabled mapping the large phase space covered by the different stellar populations of the Milky Way, and the intrinsic properties of those stars, e.g., their masses, temperatures, chemistry and evolutionary stages. Some examples of the contributions from these surveys have been the new estimates of escape velocity and mass of the Milky Way by Piffl et al.(2014) using data from the Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE; Steinmetz ∗ Much of this work was completed while this author was a NASA Hubble Fellow at Princeton University. Carnegie-Princeton Fellow y NASA Hubble Fellow z Much of this work was completed while this author was a NASA Hubble Fellow at the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science. APOGEE-2S Targeting 3 et al. 2006), and the constraints on the formation and evolution of the thin disk, thick disk and halo (Lee et al. 2011; Schlaufman et al. 2009, 2011, 2012) using data from the Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NGC 362: Another Globular Cluster with a Split Red Giant Branch⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆
    A&A 557, A138 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321905 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics NGC 362: another globular cluster with a split red giant branch,, E. Carretta1, A. Bragaglia1, R. G. Gratton2, S. Lucatello2, V. D’Orazi3,4, M. Bellazzini1, G. Catanzaro5, F. Leone6, Y. M om any 2,7, and A. Sollima1 1 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy 3 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109 Australia 4 Monash Centre for Astrophysics, Monash University, School of Mathematical Sciences, Building 28, Clayton VIC 3800, Melbourne, Australia 5 INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy 6 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy 7 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile Received 16 May 2013 / Accepted 11 July 2013 ABSTRACT We obtained FLAMES GIRAFFE+UVES spectra for both first- and second-generation red giant branch (RGB) stars in the globular cluster (GC) NGC 362 and used them to derive abundances of 21 atomic species for a sample of 92 stars. The surveyed elements include proton-capture (O, Na, Mg, Al, Si), α-capture (Ca, Ti), Fe-peak (Sc, V, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu), and neutron-capture elements (Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Eu, Dy). The analysis is fully consistent with that presented for twenty GCs in previous papers of this series. Stars in NGC 362 seem to be clustered into two discrete groups along the Na-O anti-correlation with a gap at [O/Na] ∼ 0 dex.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects
    Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Porto Alegre 2017 Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Dissertação elaborada sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Eduardo Luis Damiani Bica, co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Charles José Bon- ato e apresentada ao Instituto de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul em preenchimento do requisito par- cial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Física. Porto Alegre 2017 Acknowledgements To my parents, who supported me and made this possible, in a time and place where being in a university was just a distant dream. To my dearest friends Elisabeth, Robert, Augusto, and Natália - who so many times helped me go from "I give up" to "I’ll try once more". To my cats Kira, Fen, and Demi - who lazily join me in bed at the end of the day, and make everything worthwhile. "But, first of all, it will be necessary to explain what is our idea of a cluster of stars, and by what means we have obtained it. For an instance, I shall take the phenomenon which presents itself in many clusters: It is that of a number of lucid spots, of equal lustre, scattered over a circular space, in such a manner as to appear gradually more compressed towards the middle; and which compression, in the clusters to which I allude, is generally carried so far, as, by imperceptible degrees, to end in a luminous center, of a resolvable blaze of light." William Herschel, 1789 Abstract We provide a sample of 170 Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) and analyse its spatial distribution properties.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Comet ISON Hurtles Toward an Uncertain Destiny with the Sun
    3 Director’s Message Markus Kissler-Patig 6 Featured Science: Dynamical Masses of Galaxy Clusters Discovered with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Cristóbal Sifón, Felipe Menanteau, John P. Hughes, and L. Felipe Barrientos, for the ACT collaboration 11 Science Highlights Nancy A. Levenson 14 Cover Story: GeMS Embarks on the Universe Benoit Neichel and Rodrigo Carrasco 19 Instrumentation Development Updates Percy Gomez, Stephen Goodsell, Fredrik Rantakyro, and Eric Tollestrup 23 Operations Corner Andy Adamson 26 Featured Press Release: Comet ISON Hurtles Toward an Uncertain Destiny with the Sun On the Cover: GeminiFocus July 2013 The montage on GeminiFocus is a quarterly publication of Gemini Observatory this issue’s cover highlights several of 670 N. A‘ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 USA the spectacular images Phone: (808) 974-2500 Fax: (808) 974-2589 gathered as part of Online viewing address: the System Verification www.gemini.edu/geminifocus of the Gemini Multi- Managing Editor: Peter Michaud conjugate adaptive Science Editor: Nancy A. Levenson optics System (GeMS). Associate Editor: Stephen James O’Meara See the article starting on page 14 Designer: Eve Furchgott / Blue Heron Multimedia to learn more about this system and the cutting-edge science it Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. is performing — right out of the starting gate! 2 GeminiFocus July2013 Markus Kissler-Patig Director’s Message 2013: A Year of Milestones, Change, and Accomplishments We’ve seen quite a few changes at Gemini since the start of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 1989Apj. . .339. .904C the Astrophysical Journal, 339:904^918,1989 April 15 © 1989. the American Astronomical Society. All Righ
    .904C The Astrophysical Journal, 339:904^918,1989 April 15 © 1989. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. .339. 1989ApJ. AN ANALYSIS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF GLOBULAR CLUSTERS WITH POSTCOLLAPSE CORES IN THE GALAXY David F. Chernoff1 Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University AND S. Djorgovski2 California Institute of Technology Received 1988 May 6 ¡accepted 1988 September 20 ABSTRACT We present a new compilation of structural parameters for Galactic globular clusters, based on the data from the complete survey published by Djorgovski, King, and collaborators in 1984, 1986, and 1987 and the e find that the s aboutIhZTth' the ?Galactic| t center than di t nbutionthe distribution of the post^ore-collapsed of the King model (PCC) (KM) clustersclusters. is Withinmuch morethe KM concentrated family a similar trend exists: centrally condensed KM clusters are found, on average, at smaller galactocentric radii To deal with the problem of Galactic obscuration, we used a distance-independent analysis, similar to one devel- oped and published by Frenk and White in 1982. We analyzed the shapes of the KM and PCC cluster systems; they are each consistent with a symmetrical distribution of the clusters about the Galactic center At hxed distance from the center, the clusters at smaller heights above the plane (and thus the less inclined orbits) are marginally more concentrated. The data indicate that the more concentrated KM clusters tend to have C eS ther hand the cc clusters KMK M clusters.H nTr^Th The pPCCiï clusters^ ° show, signs’. ofP tidal distortions are lessm theirluminous envelopes: than thetheir highest major concentrationaxes tend to point toward the Galactic center; the KM clusters show no such effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundances for Globular Cluster Giants
    A&A manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) ASTRONOMY AND Your thesaurus codes are: ASTROPHYSICS (08.01.1; 08.01.03; 08.16.3; 10.07.3) 24.8.2017 Abundances for Globular Cluster Giants: I. Homogeneous Metallicities for 24 Clusters E. Carretta1,3, R. G. Gratton2 1 Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, I-40126 Bologna, ITALY 2 Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, ITALY 3 Dipartimento d’Astronomia, Universit`adi Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, ITALY Received 28 February 1996/Accepted 21 May 1996 Abstract. We have obtained high resolution, high signal- calibration of the ∆S index) and our new cluster metallici- to-noise ratio CCD echelle spectra of 10 bright red giants ties. It could be tentatively ascribed to non-linearity in the in 3 globular clusters (47 Tuc, NGC 6752 and NGC 6397) [Fe/H]−∆S relationship. The impact of new metallicities roughly spanning the whole range of metallicities of the on major astrophysical problems is exemplified through galactic globular cluster system. The analysis of this newly a simple exercise on the Oosterhoff effect in the classical acquired material reveals no significant evidence of star- pair M 3 and M 15. to-star variation of the [Fe/H] ratio in these three clusters. Moreover, a large set of high quality literature data (equiv- Key words: Stars: abundances - Stars: Atmospheres - alent widths from high dispersion CCD spectra) was re- Stars: Population II - globular clusters: general analyzed in an homogeneous and self-consistent way to in- tegrate our observations and derive new metal abundances for more than 160 bright red giants in 24 globular clusters (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIRIT Target Lists
    JANUARY and FEBRUARY deep sky objects JANUARY FEBRUARY OBJECT RA (2000) DECL (2000) OBJECT RA (2000) DECL (2000) Category 1 (west of meridian) Category 1 (west of meridian) NGC 1532 04h 12m 04s -32° 52' 23" NGC 1792 05h 05m 14s -37° 58' 47" NGC 1566 04h 20m 00s -54° 56' 18" NGC 1532 04h 12m 04s -32° 52' 23" NGC 1546 04h 14m 37s -56° 03' 37" NGC 1672 04h 45m 43s -59° 14' 52" NGC 1313 03h 18m 16s -66° 29' 43" NGC 1313 03h 18m 15s -66° 29' 51" NGC 1365 03h 33m 37s -36° 08' 27" NGC 1566 04h 20m 01s -54° 56' 14" NGC 1097 02h 46m 19s -30° 16' 32" NGC 1546 04h 14m 37s -56° 03' 37" NGC 1232 03h 09m 45s -20° 34' 45" NGC 1433 03h 42m 01s -47° 13' 19" NGC 1068 02h 42m 40s -00° 00' 48" NGC 1792 05h 05m 14s -37° 58' 47" NGC 300 00h 54m 54s -37° 40' 57" NGC 2217 06h 21m 40s -27° 14' 03" Category 1 (east of meridian) Category 1 (east of meridian) NGC 1637 04h 41m 28s -02° 51' 28" NGC 2442 07h 36m 24s -69° 31' 50" NGC 1808 05h 07m 42s -37° 30' 48" NGC 2280 06h 44m 49s -27° 38' 20" NGC 1792 05h 05m 14s -37° 58' 47" NGC 2292 06h 47m 39s -26° 44' 47" NGC 1617 04h 31m 40s -54° 36' 07" NGC 2325 07h 02m 40s -28° 41' 52" NGC 1672 04h 45m 43s -59° 14' 52" NGC 3059 09h 50m 08s -73° 55' 17" NGC 1964 05h 33m 22s -21° 56' 43" NGC 2559 08h 17m 06s -27° 27' 25" NGC 2196 06h 12m 10s -21° 48' 22" NGC 2566 08h 18m 46s -25° 30' 02" NGC 2217 06h 21m 40s -27° 14' 03" NGC 2613 08h 33m 23s -22° 58' 22" NGC 2442 07h 36m 20s -69° 31' 29" Category 2 Category 2 M 42 05h 35m 17s -05° 23' 25" M 42 05h 35m 17s -05° 23' 25" NGC 2070 05h 38m 38s -69° 05' 39" NGC 2070 05h 38m 38s -69°
    [Show full text]
  • Caldwell Catalogue - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Caldwell catalogue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Log in / create account Article Discussion Read Edit View history Caldwell catalogue From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents The Caldwell Catalogue is an astronomical catalog of 109 bright star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies for observation by amateur astronomers. The list was compiled Featured content by Sir Patrick Caldwell-Moore, better known as Patrick Moore, as a complement to the Messier Catalogue. Current events The Messier Catalogue is used frequently by amateur astronomers as a list of interesting deep-sky objects for observations, but Moore noted that the list did not include Random article many of the sky's brightest deep-sky objects, including the Hyades, the Double Cluster (NGC 869 and NGC 884), and NGC 253. Moreover, Moore observed that the Donate to Wikipedia Messier Catalogue, which was compiled based on observations in the Northern Hemisphere, excluded bright deep-sky objects visible in the Southern Hemisphere such [1][2] Interaction as Omega Centauri, Centaurus A, the Jewel Box, and 47 Tucanae. He quickly compiled a list of 109 objects (to match the number of objects in the Messier [3] Help Catalogue) and published it in Sky & Telescope in December 1995. About Wikipedia Since its publication, the catalogue has grown in popularity and usage within the amateur astronomical community. Small compilation errors in the original 1995 version Community portal of the list have since been corrected. Unusually, Moore used one of his surnames to name the list, and the catalogue adopts "C" numbers to rename objects with more Recent changes common designations.[4] Contact Wikipedia As stated above, the list was compiled from objects already identified by professional astronomers and commonly observed by amateur astronomers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Dynamics of M3, M13, and M92: Stringent Limits on the Masses of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes??? S
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. pmas_clusters_merged_arxiv_v1 c ESO 2018 June 5, 2018 The central dynamics of M3, M13, and M92: Stringent limits on the masses of intermediate-mass black holes??? S. Kamann1,2, L. Wisotzki1, M. M. Roth1, J. Gerssen1, T.-O. Husser2, C. Sandin1, and P. Weilbacher1 1 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany 2 Institut für Astrophysik, Universität Göttingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Received / Accepted ABSTRACT We used the PMAS integral field spectrograph to obtain large sets of radial velocities in the central regions of three northern Galac- tic globular clusters: M3, M13, and M92. By applying the novel technique of crowded field 3D spectroscopy, we measured radial velocities for about 80 stars within the central ∼ 1000 of each cluster. These are by far the largest spectroscopic datasets obtained in the innermost parts of these clusters up to now. To obtain kinematical data across the whole extent of the clusters, we complement our data with measurements available in the literature. We combine our velocity measurements with surface brightness profiles to analyse the internal dynamics of each cluster using spherical Jeans models, and investigate whether our data provide evidence for an intermediate-mass black hole in any of the clusters. The surface brightness profiles reveal that all three clusters are consistent with a core profile, although shallow cusps cannot be excluded. We find that spherical Jeans models with a constant mass-to-light ratio provide a good overall representation of the kinematical data.
    [Show full text]
  • 108 Afocal Procedure, 105 Age of Globular Clusters, 25, 28–29 O
    Index Index Achromats, 70, 73, 79 Apochromats (APO), 70, Averted vision Adhafera, 44 73, 79 technique, 96, 98, Adobe Photoshop Aquarius, 43, 99 112 (software), 108 Aquila, 10, 36, 45, 65 Afocal procedure, 105 Arches cluster, 23 B1620-26, 37 Age Archinal, Brent, 63, 64, Barkhatova (Bar) of globular clusters, 89, 195 catalogue, 196 25, 28–29 Arcturus, 43 Barlow lens, 78–79, 110 of open clusters, Aricebo radio telescope, Barnard’s Galaxy, 49 15–16 33 Basel (Bas) catalogue, 196 of star complexes, 41 Aries, 45 Bayer classification of stellar associations, Arp 2, 51 system, 93 39, 41–42 Arp catalogue, 197 Be16, 63 of the universe, 28 Arp-Madore (AM)-1, 33 Beehive Cluster, 13, 60, Aldebaran, 43 Arp-Madore (AM)-2, 148 Alessi, 22, 61 48, 65 Bergeron 1, 22 Alessi catalogue, 196 Arp-Madore (AM) Bergeron, J., 22 Algenubi, 44 catalogue, 197 Berkeley 11, 124f, 125 Algieba, 44 Asterisms, 43–45, Berkeley 17, 15 Algol (Demon Star), 65, 94 Berkeley 19, 130 21 Astronomy (magazine), Berkeley 29, 18 Alnilam, 5–6 89 Berkeley 42, 171–173 Alnitak, 5–6 Astronomy Now Berkeley (Be) catalogue, Alpha Centauri, 25 (magazine), 89 196 Alpha Orionis, 93 Astrophotography, 94, Beta Pictoris, 42 Alpha Persei, 40 101, 102–103 Beta Piscium, 44 Altair, 44 Astroplanner (software), Betelgeuse, 93 Alterf, 44 90 Big Bang, 5, 29 Altitude-Azimuth Astro-Snap (software), Big Dipper, 19, 43 (Alt-Az) mount, 107 Binary millisecond 75–76 AstroStack (software), pulsars, 30 Andromeda Galaxy, 36, 108 Binary stars, 8, 52 39, 41, 48, 52, 61 AstroVideo (software), in globular clusters, ANR 1947
    [Show full text]
  • Globular Cluster Club
    Globular Cluster Observing Club Raleigh Astronomy Club Version 1.2 22 June 2007 Introduction Welcome to the Globular Cluster Observing Club! This list is intended to give you an appreciation for the deep-sky objects known as globular clusters. There are 153 known Milky Way Globular Clusters of which the entire list can be found on the seds.org site listed below. To receive your Gold level we will only have you do sixty of them along with one challenge object from a list of three. Challenge objects being the extra-galactic globular Mayall II (G1) located in the Andromeda Galaxy, Palomar 4 in Ursa Major, and Omega Centauri a magnificent southern globular. The first two challenge your scope and viewing ability while Omega Centauri challenges your ability to plan for a southern view. A Silver level is also available and will be within the range of a 4 inch to 8 inch scope depending upon seeing conditions. Many of the objects are found in the Messier, Caldwell, or Herschel catalogs and can springboard you into those clubs. The list is meant for your viewing enrichment and edification of these types of clusters. It is also meant to enhance your viewing skills. You are encouraged to view the clusters with a critical eye toward the cluster’s size, visual magnitude, resolvability, concentration and colors. The Astronomical League’s Globular Clusters Club book “Guide to the Globular Cluster Observing Club” is an excellent resource for this endeavor. You will be asked to either sketch the cluster or give a short description of your visual impression, citing seeing conditions, time, date, cluster’s size, magnitude, resolvability, concentration, and any star colors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caldwell Catalogue+Photos
    The Caldwell Catalogue was compiled in 1995 by Sir Patrick Moore. He has said he started it for fun because he had some spare time after finishing writing up his latest observations of Mars. He looked at some nebulae, including the ones Charles Messier had not listed in his catalogue. Messier was only interested in listing those objects which he thought could be confused for the comets, he also only listed objects viewable from where he observed from in the Northern hemisphere. Moore's catalogue extends into the Southern hemisphere. Having completed it in a few hours, he sent it off to the Sky & Telescope magazine thinking it would amuse them. They published it in December 1995. Since then, the list has grown in popularity and use throughout the amateur astronomy community. Obviously Moore couldn't use 'M' as a prefix for the objects, so seeing as his surname is actually Caldwell-Moore he used C, and thus also known as the Caldwell catalogue. http://www.12dstring.me.uk/caldwelllistform.php Caldwell NGC Type Distance Apparent Picture Number Number Magnitude C1 NGC 188 Open Cluster 4.8 kly +8.1 C2 NGC 40 Planetary Nebula 3.5 kly +11.4 C3 NGC 4236 Galaxy 7000 kly +9.7 C4 NGC 7023 Open Cluster 1.4 kly +7.0 C5 NGC 0 Galaxy 13000 kly +9.2 C6 NGC 6543 Planetary Nebula 3 kly +8.1 C7 NGC 2403 Galaxy 14000 kly +8.4 C8 NGC 559 Open Cluster 3.7 kly +9.5 C9 NGC 0 Nebula 2.8 kly +0.0 C10 NGC 663 Open Cluster 7.2 kly +7.1 C11 NGC 7635 Nebula 7.1 kly +11.0 C12 NGC 6946 Galaxy 18000 kly +8.9 C13 NGC 457 Open Cluster 9 kly +6.4 C14 NGC 869 Open Cluster
    [Show full text]