Draft version August 27, 2021 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 Final Targeting Strategy for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2S Survey Felipe A. Santana,1 Rachael L. Beaton,2, 3, ∗ Kevin R. Covey,4 Julia E. O'Connell,5 Penelope´ Longa-Pena,~ 6 Roger Cohen,7 Jose´ G. Fernandez-Trincado,´ 8 Christian R. Hayes,9 Gail Zasowski,10 Jennifer S. Sobeck,9 Steven R. Majewski,11 S. D. Chojnowski,12, 13 Nathan De Lee,14, 15 Ryan J. Oelkers,15 Guy S. Stringfellow,16 Andres´ Almeida,17 Borja Anguiano,11, 18 John Donor,19 Peter M. Frinchaboy,19 Sten Hasselquist,10, 20 Jennifer A. Johnson,21 Juna A. Kollmeier,3 David L. Nidever,13 Adrian. M. Price-Whelan,22 Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada,23, 24 Mathias Schultheis,25 Matthew Shetrone,26 Joshua D. Simon,3 Conny Aerts,27 Jura Borissova,28, 24 Maria R. Drout,3, 29 Doug Geisler,5, 17, 30 C.Y. Law,31, 32 Nicolas Medina,28, 33 Dante Minniti,34, 35 Antonela Monachesi,17, 30 Ricardo R. Munoz,~ 1 Rados law Poleski,36, 21 Alexandre Roman-Lopes,30 Kevin C. Schlaufman,37 Amelia M. Stutz,5 Johanna Teske,38, y Andrew Tkachenko,27 Jennifer L. Van Saders,39 Alycia Weinberger,38 and Manuela Zoccali24, 40 1Departamento de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago 2Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544 3The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101 4Department of Physics & Astronomy, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, 98225, USA 5Departamento de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Concepci´on,Casilla 160-C, Concepci´on,Chile 6Unidad de Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Antofagasta, Avenida Angamos 601, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile 7Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA 8Instituto de Astronom´ıa y Ciencias Planetarias, Universidad de Atacama, Copayapu 485, Copiap´o,Chile 9Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA 10Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA 11Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA 12Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88001, USA 13Department of Physics, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173840, Bozeman, MT 59717-3840, USA 14Department of Physics, Geology, and Engineering Technology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA 15Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA 16Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA 17Instituto de Investigaci´onMultidisciplinario en Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa,Universidad de La Serena. Avenida Ra´ulBitr´anS/N, La Serena, Chile 18Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, NSW 2109, Australia 19Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA 20NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow 21Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA 22Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10010, USA 23Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicu~naMackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile 24Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Av. Vicu~na Mackenna 4860, 782-0436, Macul, Santiago, Chile 25Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, Lagrange Boulevard de l'Observatoire 06304 Nice, France 26University of California Observatories, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 27Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium 28Instituto de F´ısica y Astronom´ıa,Universidad de Valpara´ıso,Av. Gran Breta~na1111, Playa Ancha, Casilla 5030, Chile. arXiv:2108.11908v1 [astro-ph.GA] 26 Aug 2021 29Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H4 Canada 30Departamento de Astronomia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena. Av. Juan Cisternas 1200, La Serena, Chile 31Department of Space, Earth & Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden 32Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR 33Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), Santiago, Chile. 34Departamento de Ciencias F´ısicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Andr´esBello, Fern´andezConcha 700, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 35Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, V-00120, Italy Corresponding author: Felipe A. Santana [email protected] 2 Santana et al. 36Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland 37Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 38Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5241 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015, USAz 39Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai'i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 40Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicu~naMackenna 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Santiago, Chile ABSTRACT APOGEE is a high-resolution (R ∼ 22; 000), near-infrared, multi-epoch, spectroscopic survey of the Milky Way. The second generation of the APOGEE project, APOGEE-2, includes an expansion of the survey to the Southern Hemisphere called APOGEE-2S. This expansion enabled APOGEE to perform a fully panoramic mapping of all the main regions of the Milky Way; in particular, by operating in the H-band, APOGEE is uniquely able to probe the dust-hidden inner regions of the Milky Way that are best accessed from the Southern Hemisphere. In this paper we present the targeting strategy of APOGEE-2S, with special attention to documenting modifications to the original, previously published plan. The motivation for these changes is explained as well as an assessment of their effectiveness in achieving their intended scientific objective. In anticipation of this being the last paper detailing APOGEE targeting, we present an accounting of all such information complete through the end of the APOGEE-2S project; this includes several main survey programs dedicated to exploration of major stellar populations and regions of the Milky Way, as well as a full list of programs contributing to the APOGEE database through allocations of observing time by the Chilean National Time Allocation Committee (CNTAC) and the Carnegie Institution for Science (CIS). This work was presented along with a companion article, R. Beaton et al. (submitted; AAS29028), presenting the final target selection strategy adopted for APOGEE-2 in the Northern Hemisphere. Keywords: Astronomical Databases { Galaxy abundances { Galaxy dynamics { Galaxy evolution { Galaxy formation { Galaxy kinematics { Galaxy stellar content { Galaxy structure { Milky Way Galaxy { Surveys 1. INTRODUCTION Detailed analyses of the different substructures of the Milky Way and the physical processes that govern their interplay require high precision, homogeneous, large data samples covering all of its main regions. In that sense, modern photometric surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) or the Two Micron All- Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006) have been key to expanding our knowledge about our Milky Way. The remarkable discoveries enabled by these SDSS and 2MASS imaging include: (i) a large population of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies and low luminosity star clusters (Belokurov et al. 2007; Koposov et al. 2007; Belokurov et al. 2010), (ii) constraints on the morphology of both the stellar and dark matter halo (e.g., Majewski et al. 2003; Helmi 2004; Johnston et al. 2005; Law et al. 2005; Belokurov et al. 2006; Juri´cet al. 2008; Law & Majewski 2010; Deg & Widrow 2013), (iii) tidal tails from both disrupting star clusters and Milky Way satellite galaxies (e.g., Ivezi´cet al. 2000; Odenkirchen et al. 2001; Newberg et al. 2002; Majewski et al. 2003; Grillmair & Johnson 2006; Grillmair & Dionatos 2006; Grillmair 2009), (iv) multiple stellar populations in globular clusters (e.g., Lardo et al. 2011; Gratton et al. 2012), and (v) the characterization of complex substructures in the bulge/bar association using red clump stars (e.g., McWilliam & Zoccali 2010; Saito et al. 2011; Wegg et al. 2015). Despite the importance of photometric surveys in addressing these topics, full chemo-dynamical models of the Milky Way require input from precise and large-scale spectroscopic datasets. In this sense, a large number of recent spectro- scopic Galactic surveys have enabled mapping the large phase space covered by the different stellar populations of the Milky Way, and the intrinsic properties of those stars, e.g., their masses, temperatures, chemistry and evolutionary stages. Some examples of the contributions from these surveys have been the new estimates of escape velocity and mass of the Milky Way by Piffl et al.(2014) using data from the Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE; Steinmetz ∗ Much of this work was completed while this author was a NASA Hubble Fellow at Princeton University. Carnegie-Princeton Fellow y NASA Hubble Fellow z Much of this work was completed while this author was a NASA Hubble Fellow at the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science. APOGEE-2S Targeting 3 et al. 2006), and the constraints on the formation and evolution of the thin disk, thick disk and halo (Lee et al. 2011; Schlaufman et al. 2009, 2011, 2012) using data from the Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding