DOCSLIB.ORG

A Theoretical Conceptualization of Internalized Subordination Teeomm K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Theoretical Conceptualization of Internalized Subordination Teeomm K University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 9-2012 Understanding Internalized Oppression: A Theoretical Conceptualization of Internalized Subordination Teeomm K. Williams University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Teeomm K., "Understanding Internalized Oppression: A Theoretical Conceptualization of Internalized Subordination" (2012). Open Access Dissertations. 627. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/627 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION: A THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF INTERNALIZED SUBORDINATION A Dissertation Presented by TEEOMM K. WILLIAMS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION September 2012 Social Justice Education Program © Copyright by Teeomm K. Williams 2012 All Rights Reserved UNDERSTANDING INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION: A THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF INTERNALIZED SUBORDINATION A Dissertation Presented by TEEOMM K. WILLIAMS Approved as to style and content by: Barbara Love, Chair Maurianne Adams, Member Todd Crosset, Member Christine B. McCormick, Dean School of Education DEDICATION For the educators, activists, freedom fighters, and liberation workers who came before me. Your love, hard work, and sacrifice made this possible. It is upon your shoulders I stand, and I am humbled and grateful. For the educators, activists, freedom fighters, and liberation workers who come after me. May your efforts always be guided by unconditional love and a steadfast belief that the world can and will be a better place. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This has been a spectacular and challenging journey. Who I am today is fundamentally different from the person I was when I started. I have many people to thank for that. Though I’ve done my best to acknowledge them here, no words can ever express the depth of my appreciation. To Mom, Cid, Shon, Chris, Uncle Kevin, and the crew: This dissertation is as much yours as it is mine. You’ve been with me every step of the way. Thank you for all of your love and support. Thank you for taking my late night calls. Thank you for forgiving me when I didn’t call. Thank you for encouraging me to continue when I wasn’t so sure I wanted to. I love you. To Barbara Love: My professor, my mentor, my friend. I truly do not have the words to express my gratitude. Your friendship, teaching, and mentorship have helped me to become a better, stronger, wiser man. I will always strive to uphold the brilliant and powerful example you’ve set. There is a reason your name is Love. Thank you. To Maurianne Adams: There were plenty of times that I really wanted to quit this process, both because of its length and its complexity. Your steady reassurance and willingness to take the time to calmly pick apart the issues I struggled with were not only invaluable but very much appreciated. And though I may have complained, I particularly appreciate the way you consistently pushed me to such a high level of excellence. I am ever grateful to have had your support and mentorship. Thank you. To Todd Crosset: I truly enjoyed our dialogues. I appreciate your thoughtful questions and your thoughtful responses to my questions. Your guidance, positive v reinforcement and humor were critical in helping me to complete this process. Thank you for your steadfast support. To Ximena Zuniga and Pat Griffin: Both of you have been instrumental in my development as a practitioner and scholar. Thank you for the all of the hard work you’ve done (and continue to do!) and for the gifts you’ve imparted. To Dr. Julius Thompson: You were the first scholar I’d ever known who could use big academic words and profanity in the same sentence and make them both sound equally brilliant. Our time together taught me the meaning of unwavering excellence. I miss your straightforward way of telling me to get my act together. Thank you for your humor, support, and guidance. To the many friends who have supported me along the way: Where would I be without you? Dissertations, though written by one person, are usually community endeavors. Your love and support has helped me to get through this process mostly sane and relatively intact. Though I do not have the space to thank all of you here, please know that I love you all dearly. And now that I’ll have more time on my hands, on to our next adventure! To the SJE family past and present: Thank you, thank you, thank you. You’ve been a part of my life for many years. I’m more amazed by all of you now than I was when I first started. Your collective wisdom, guidance, and willingness to challenge with patience and care have been transformational. I look forward to deepening our friendships and continuing our collective liberatory endeavors. Last, but certainly not least, to Linda Guthrie. Thank you for your friendship, support, encouragement, and assistance throughout the years. You’ve been an vi instrumental part of my success and the completion of this dissertation. I appreciate everything that you’ve done for me. And I promise I’ll have that ID number memorized sometime before graduation. vii ABSTRACT UNDERSTANDING INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION: A THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF INTERNALIZED SUBORDINATION SEPTEMBER 2012 TEEOMM K. WILLIAMS, B.A., SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY M.A., GONZAGA UNIVERSITY M.Ed., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Barbara J. Love Internalized oppression is one of the conceptual foundations of social justice education. Though the literature on internalized oppression is rich with descriptive data, little theory has been developed in this area. To date, the field of Social Justice Education has been limited by this oversight. Drawing upon the work of theorists who have examined this topic across a variety of social identities, this study presents a generalizable framework for understanding and analyzing internalized oppression. More specifically, this research focuses on the internalized oppression of subordinant groups, also known as internalized subordination. The framework presented within this study identifies internalized oppression as having three core components or “defining elements”: process, state, and action. It is intended to be used as a foundation and starting point for, rather than in lieu of, the examination of the internalized oppression specific to particular social identities. Further, this framework is intended to benefit both scholars and practitioners of social justice and will aide in the development of methodologies and pedagogies aimed at interrupting internalized oppression and promoting liberatory consciousness. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................v ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... xii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY. .........................................................................1 Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................2 Purpose of the Study ...........................................................................................4 Clarifications and Delimitations ..........................................................................5 Design of the Study .............................................................................................7 Outline of Chapters .............................................................................................8 2 OVERVIEW OF OPPRESSION THEORY .............................................................. 17 Oppression and Social Identity .......................................................................... 17 Oppression as a System ..................................................................................... 21 Internalized Oppression within the Context of Oppression Theory .................... 25 Internalized Oppression: Individual and Group Level Phenomenon ................... 27 3 LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................... 30 Internalized Oppression Defined ....................................................................... 32 4 INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AS PROCESS...................................................... 40 Internalization ................................................................................................... 41 Socialization ..................................................................................................... 49 Intergenerational Transmission ......................................................................... 56 Acceptance ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Download Conquering Shame and Codependency
    CONQUERING SHAME AND CODEPENDENCY: 8 STEPS TO FREEING THE TRUE YOU PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Darlene Lancer | 180 pages | 01 Jul 2014 | Hazelden Publishing & Educational Services | 9781616495336 | English | Center City, United States Conquering Shame and Codependency: 8 Steps to Freeing the True You PDF Book Sexual Shame 8. Being able to discern shame and codependency and choose acceptance as well as relationship symbiosis and healthy interdependence while remaining liber Finally reviewing years after reading. In fact, shame can even prevent us from being our true selves. Progress not perfection! See all 9 brand new listings. View Product. Sarah rated it really liked it Aug 09, Average rating 4. Read an excerpt of this book! Whether you are facing relapse, learning to overcoming complacency, or taking responsibility for your feelings I feel seen This book covers shame in the same type of way Brene Brown covers vulnerability. I focused on a few of those areas that I could somewhat relate to I only picked up this book to research for someone at work. Showing Mar 22, Terralyn rated it it was amazing. Parents might shame kids for expressing feelings such as anger or sadness. Skip to main content. This was my favorite, which reminds me I need to order a couple more, I keep giving them away! Overall, I wanted to get a grasp on codependency as a whole. These codependent relationships --where we overlook our own needs and desires as we try to care for, protect, or please ather--are often covering up abuse, addiction, or other harmful behaviours. While learning how to communicate my own needs, I have also learned how to communicate with my wife without judgments or passive aggressive responses, but rather to listen wholeheartedly and respond in a productive way.
    [Show full text]
  • ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION and SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE in COLLEGE WOMEN Marina Leigh Costanzo
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN Marina Leigh Costanzo Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Recommended Citation Costanzo, Marina Leigh, "ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11264. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11264 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN By MARINA LEIGH COSTANZO B.A., University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2010 M.A., University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, 2013 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Clinical Psychology The University of Montana Missoula, MT August 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Christine Fiore, Chair Psychology Laura Kirsch Psychology Jennifer Robohm Psychology Gyda Swaney Psychology Sara Hayden Communication Studies INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE ii Costanzo, Marina, PhD, Summer 2018 Clinical Psychology Abstract Chairperson: Christine Fiore Sexualized violence on college campuses has recently entered the media spotlight. One in five women are sexually assaulted during college and over 90% of these women know their attackers (Black et al., 2011; Cleere & Lynn, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Family Dynamics, Codependency, Healthy Boundaries, and Addiction
    9/26/2019 Addiction in the Family System Presenter: Samantha St. Louis, MS, BS, LPC, CSAC, NCC Learning Objectives • Explore the impact substance use has on a family dynamic • Understand family roles in families where a loved one is addicted • Demonstrate understanding of the positive and negative aspects of each family role • Explore the connection between family roles and co-dependent relationships 1 9/26/2019 Addiction • According to the CDC: o In 2016, 48.5 million Americans used illicit drugs or misused prescription drugs. o Opioid overdose visits to the emergency department increased by 30% from July 2016 to September 2017. o Sales of—and deaths from—prescription opioids have nearly quadrupled in the United States since 1999. o An average of 6 people die from alcohol poisoning in the US each day—and 76% of these are middle-aged adults. o Binge drinking results in $171 billion a year in healthcare- related costs and lowered employee productivity. Where does addition start? • Biology: The genes that people are born with account for about 60% of a person's risk for addiction. • Environment: A person’s environment includes many different influences, from family and friends to economic status and general quality of life. • Development: Genetic and environmental factors interact with critical developmental stages in a person’s life to affect addiction risk. Although taking drugs at any age can lead to addiction, the earlier that drug use begins, the more likely it will progress to addiction. 2 9/26/2019 Substance Use ,Ethnicity, and Sexual Orientation • In 2013, among persons aged 12 or older, the rate of substance dependence was higher among American Indians or Alaska Natives (AI/AN) than any other population group.
    [Show full text]
  • Why They Can't Let Go. “It Is Better to Know Some of the Questions of The
    Letting Go: Recognizing Codependent Behavior ~~~ Presented by Fran Campbell, MSN, RN, MEd, PMHCNS-BC, CARN Bonnie Franckowiak, DNP, FNP-BC, CARN-AP ~~~ IntNSA Annual Conference Denver, CO 2018 OR… Why they can’t let go. “It is better to know some of the questions ------ than all of the answers” 1 Codependency • “Codependency Operationalized” • A picture is worth a thousand words!! A picture is worth a thousand words Codependency: Origin of the Concept • Prior to the term “ chemical dependency ” family members and spouses of alcoholics were called co-alcoholics • When the term “chemical dependency” began to be used, spouses were called codependents 2 Codependency: Roots The codependency movement has its roots in the theories of German psychoanalyst Karen Horney (the first feminist psychoanalyst) In 1941she proposed her theory that some people develop a “Moving Toward” personality style (cont.) Codependents tend to “move toward” and attach to a personality that is somewhat “vulnerable and needy” Karen Horney believed that this behavior was a way of dealing with a deep seeded anxiety and insecurity Codependency: The Process These individuals move “toward others” to “try to help them,” but the real goal of the interaction is to gain their approval and affection and subconsciously “control them” using a very dependent and manipulative style of behavior “ I’m only trying to help you” 3 (cont.) Dr. Horney believed that this style of interaction seen in codependency is a reaction to dysfunctional parenting. In childhood, these individuals had critical, indifferent, rigid, abusive, or unavailable parents (cont.) They develop a helping stance, and try to get approval through their “behavior” rather than feeling valued just because they exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Codependency in Master's-Level Counseling Students
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2007 Codependency in Master's-Level Counseling Students Terri Lynne Pardee Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the School Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Pardee, Terri Lynne, "Codependency in Master's-Level Counseling Students" (2007). Dissertations. 619. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/619 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University School of Education CODEPENDENCY IN MASTER’S-LEVEL COUNSELING STUDENTS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Terri Lynne Pardee March 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3261212 Copyright 2007 by Pardee, Terri Lynne All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Internalized Racism Scale for Asian Americans by Liang Liao a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ASU Digital Repository Development of the Internalized Racism Scale for Asian Americans by Liang Liao A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved July 2016 by the Dissertation Committee: Giac-Thao Thanh Tran, Co-Chair Richard T. Kinnier, Co-Chair Hyung Chol Yoo ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY August 2016 ABSTRACT Internalized racism is a destructive, yet insidious psychological effect of racism. Although it has garnered increased attention in the research and clinical community due to its pervasive impact in racial minority individuals, empirical research on this topic has been limited. At the time of this study, no existing scale captures the key dimensions of internalized racism of Asian Americans. This study attempted to fill this gap by developing a self-report instrument that identified the key dimensions of this psychological construct. Seven hundred and fourteen Asian Americans participated in this study, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to investigate the factor structure of the scale. Results indicated that the Internalized Racism Scale for Asian Americans (IRSAA) has five factors, which are Endorsement of Negative Stereotypes, Sense of Inferiority, Denial or Minimization of Racism, Emasculation of Asian American Men, and Within-group Discrimination. This dissertation also examines and discusses the evidence of convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity for the IRSAA subscales. i DEDICATION To my Mother, who loves me unconditionally, I love you! To Preethi, the love of my life! ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am forever grateful for my committee members who were generous with their expertise and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Narcissus by Darlene Lancer, LMFT
    Poor Narcissus By Darlene Lancer, LMFT The gods sentenced him to a life without human love. He fell in love with his own reflection in pool of water and died hungering for its response. Like Narcissus, narcissists only love themselves as reflected in the eyes of others. It’s a common misconception that they love themselves. They actually dislike themselves immensely. Their inflated self-flattery, perfectionism, and arrogance are merely covers for the self-loathing they don’t admit–usually even to themselves. Instead, it’s projected outwards in their disdain for and criticism of others. They’re too afraid to look at themselves, because they believe that the truth would be devastating. Actually, they don’t have much of a Self at all. Emotionally, they’re dead inside and they hunger to be filled and validated by others. Sadly, they’re unable to appreciate the love they do get and alienate those who give it. Diagnosis All personality traits, including narcissism, range from mild to severe. Narcissism can be viewed on a continuum from mature to archaic. Mature individuals are able to idealize romantic partners, express their talents and skills, and accomplish their goals, while employing only neurotic defenses; a middle group has unstable boundaries and employ borderline defenses; and those highly sensitive to wounding, employ destructive, psychotic defenses and have unstable relationships (Solomon, 1989). Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), first categorized as a disorder by the American Psychiatric Association in 1987, occurs in 1 to 6.2 percent of the population; males exceed females at a ratio of 3:2 (Dhawan, 2010; McClean, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of the Experience of Internalized Oppression and Oppression in Student Affairs Organizations in the Southwestern United States
    MAKING SENSE OF THE EXPERIENCE OF INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND OPPRESSION IN STUDENT AFFAIRS ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Gayle R. Yamauchi-Gleason March 2004 © 2004 Gayle R. Yamauchi-Gleason All Rights Reserved This dissertation entitled MAKING SENSE OF THE EXPERIENCE OF INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND OPPRESSION IN STUDENT AFFAIRS ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES BY GAYLE R. YAMAUCHI-GLEASON has been approved for the School of Communication Studies and the College of Communication by David Descutner Professor of Communication Studies Kathy Krendl Dean, College of Communication YAMAUCHI-GLEASON, GAYLE R. Ph.D. March 2004. Communication Studies Making Sense of the Experience of Internalized Oppression and Oppression in Student Affairs Organizations in the Southwestern United States (221 pp.) Director of Dissertation: David Descutner This study examines the linkages between macro (historical and systemic) aspects of various oppressions (racism, sexism, classism, etc.) in two academic student affairs departments and details how they are dialogically perpetuated via tacit, micro communication practices during everyday, organizational life. In particular, this study unearths aspects of the expression and experience of internalized oppression that are misunderstood and inadequately addressed. Using an interpretive framework, organizational members’ stories were gathered through individual interviews and supplemented by meeting observations and documents. The methodologies of historical-cultural, case study, Sense-Making analysis and member checking are used to examine the data through a variety of lenses and levels of interaction. Auto ethnographic content is interwoven throughout providing a forthright discussion of the circumstances surrounding the creation, implementation and examination of the research idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Codependency
    Codependency A Secondhand Life What does it really mean? • Codependent personality is a dysfunctional relationship with the self by living through another, or for another in attempts to control, blame, or fix. The irony? Is that most people who are in fact codependent, are deep down wanting someone to care about them, fix them. Simply Said- I get my needs met through other people. What are the “symptoms?” • Seeing life as black or white • Difficulty maintaining a healthy relationship • Believe that others are responsible for our emotions • Having feelings of powerlessness • Isolate and resent authority figures because were in charge! • Fear of Change • Having difficulty setting boundaries What are the feelings behind Co-dependency? • Feeling of inadequacy • Lack of self confidence • Cannot make final decisions • Confusion between love and pity • Acting like the victim • Lies. When it would be easier to tell the truth • The helper. Always wanting to help the next • Worry and think about other’s problems more than your own • Feel safe when giving/helping others Powerlessness • Ever tried to help someone so much, but it just isn’t working? Perhaps you're exhausted now, and now understand that it simply wont work. This often offers in recovery, whether you are the addict, or the one helping the addict. • You know it is useless because you have tried everything you can to change that person’s behavior… reread that sentence. YOU tried to CHANGE someone else’s behavior. (lets get real now) A wife tells of her efforts: “I hid his bottles and looked for the ones he had hidden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four I's of Oppression
    THE FOUR "I's" OF OPPRESSION Ideological Oppression First, any oppressive system has at its core the idea that one group is somehow better than another, and in some measure has the right to control the other group. This idea gets elaborated in many ways-- more intelligent, harder working, stronger, more capable, more noble, more deserving, more advanced, chosen, normal, superior, and so on. The dominant group holds this idea about itself. And, of course, the opposite qualities are attributed to the other group--stupid, lazy, weak, incompetent, worthless, less deserving, backward, abnormal, inferior, and so on. Institutional Oppression The idea that one group is better than another group and has the right to control the other gets embedded in the institutions of the society--the laws, the legal system and police practice, the education system and schools, hiring policies, public policies, housing development, media images, political power, etc. When a woman makes two thirds of what a man makes in the same job, it is institutionalized sexism. When one out of every four African-American young men is currently in jail, on parole, or on probation, it is institutionalized racism. When psychiatric institutions and associations “diagnose” transgender people as having a mental disorder, it is institutionalized gender oppression and transphobia. Institutional oppression does not have to be intentional. For example, if a policy unintentionally reinforces and creates new inequalities between privileged and non-privileged groups, it is considered institutional oppression. Interpersonal Oppression The idea that one group is better than another and has the right to control the other, which gets structured into institutions, gives permission and reinforcement for individual members of the dominant group to personally disrespect or mistreat individuals in the oppressed group.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Ways to Avoid Codependency in Your Relationships - Worksheet
    7 Ways to Avoid Codependency in Your Relationships - Worksheet What is codependency? Codependency is a broad term and it can manifest in a variety of ways. Below are some of the most common symptoms of codependency. You don’t need to have them all to consider yourself codependent. I find it’s helpful to think of codependency on a spectrum – some of us experience more symptoms and distress due to our codependent traits than others. Which of these symptoms of codependency do you have? You feel responsible for other people’s feelings and choices; try to rescue, fix, make them feel better, or solve their problems. You feel frustrated and resentful when others don’t want your help or advice. You derive a sense of purpose from taking care of others. Your relationships can have an obsessive quality. You have difficulty accepting help. Your fear of abandonment and rejection result in people-pleasing and tolerating mistreatment. You’re hard-working, overly responsible, and may give to the point of exhaustion or resentment. You have perfectionist tendencies. You have trouble saying “no”, setting boundaries, being assertive, and asking for what you need/want. You routinely prioritize other people’s needs and wants above your own; don’t practice self-care routinely and feel guilty when you do. You’re afraid of conflict. You have difficulty trusting and being emotionally vulnerable. You suppress or numb your feelings and absorb other people’s feelings. You have low self-esteem, feel unlovable, or not good enough. You want to feel in control and have a hard time adjusting when things don’t go according to plan or the way you want.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sign of Codependency: Compulsive Giving Compulsive Giving: What
    A Sign of Codependency: Compulsive Giving by Heather Stone, Ph.D. Clinical Psychologist, PSY 21112 Acts of giving often begin from a heartfelt place, arising from empathy, kindness, and a sincere desire to help others. However, our actions can also be motivated by our own personal needs and desires, some of which are elusive to us. In those moments, acts of generosity can suddenly leave us feeling confused or overwhelmed, lost in others’ emotional pain, or consumed by the problems of the people around us. Ironically, certain acts of giving can sometimes wind up producing opposite results, inadvertent consequences, or even ill will. How, you might ask, does this happen? The following reflections are some thoughts I have had over the years regarding the fine line between healthy giving and codependency. These thoughts developed from my own awareness that good intentions and deeds can go awry, that good people can do damage with their giving, and that there is a vague, diffuse line between generosity and pathology. Compulsive Giving: What Need Does it Serve? First, looking at this from an addiction model, I realized that giving can be compulsive, automatic, and not very conscious. (This is quite different than authentic giving, which feels more like a choice that comes from the heart). The compulsive type of giving is like a reflex – a knee-jerk response that happens without awareness of the other's needs, or our own motivation. And it often serves to avoid uncomfortable feelings. As with any type of addiction, the compulsive behavior exists to satisfy a need, or to try to produce a certain feeling.
    [Show full text]