DOCSLIB.ORG

Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-Occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-Occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2006 Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology Michael David Collins University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Michael David, "Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1927 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Michael David Collins entitled "Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Daniel Simberloff, Christine R. B. Boake, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: David Buehler, Sergey Gavrilets, Louis J. Gross Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Michael David Collins entitled “Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Daniel Simberloff Major Professor Christine R. B. Boake Department Head We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: David Buehler Sergey Gavrilets Louis J. Gross Accepted for the Council: Anne Mayhew Vice Chancellor and Dean of Graduate Studies (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Avian Community Ecology: Patterns of Co-occurrence, Nestedness, and Morphology A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Michael David Collins December 2006 To my mom and dad. I miss you, Mom. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me at different stages of this work; without them, this project would not have been completed. My advisor, Dan Simberloff, provided guidance at all stages and showed immeasurable patience in allowing me the freedom and time to develop a dissertation of which I can be proud. My interactions with him have been academically and personally rewarding, and I extend to him my deepest gratitude. I am still impressed by his fairness, modesty, and objectivity. Discussions with colleagues have sharpened my thoughts. In particular, I thank Arijana Barun, Catherine Sheehy, Diego Vázquez, Howard Horne, Martin Nuñez, Monica Beals, Nate Sanders, Norris Muth, and Tad Fukami. My dissertation committee, Dan Simberloff, Dave Buehler, Lou Gross, and Sergey Gavrilets, provided cogent advice, criticism, and direction. Marc Cadotte, Martin Nuñez, Nate Sanders, Sean Gunter, and my committee critically read sections of the dissertation. Bruce Ralston, Dean Jue, Jeff Dahoda, Josh Calhoun, Matt Fitzpatrick, Steve Ahrens, Will Fontanez, and especially Jonathan Witcoski provided advice with GIS. During my time at the University of Tennessee, Phyllis Bice seemingly ran the department and constantly impressed me with her ability to solve problems that I had inadvertently created. I thank my family and friends for their unwavering support and enduring love. Dad, Steve, Jen, and Mark, Granny, Bart Kicklighter, Howard Horne, Norris Muth, Sean Gunter, and Tom Kennedy have enriched my life. And lastly, I thank my beautiful wife, Codruţa. I never could have done this without her. She and I are building a wonderful life together, and I am grateful for having found her. iii ABSTRACT A central tenet of the competition paradigm is that community structure is governed by deterministic rules. The competition paradigm pervades nearly all subdisciplines and extends to the broadest, deepest questions in ecology. To determine whether patterns of co-occurrence, nestedness, and morphology in avian communities are consistent with a competition hypothesis, I use null models to compare observed patterns to patterns expected in the absence of competition. I use presence-absence matrices of birds in three archipelagoes to test whether species exhibit exclusive distributions. Congeneric birds co-occur significantly less frequently than predicted in two archipelagoes, consistent with a competition hypothesis. However, when examined separately, most genera do not exhibit patterns that differ from random expectations. Furthermore, species differences in habitat preference and barriers to dispersal within archipelagoes are two alternate hypotheses that can explain many exclusive patterns and are supported by available data. Distributional evidence alone does not implicate competition. I argue that the range of conditions under which competition is likely to generate exclusive distributions across islands is narrow. Although nested patterns are viewed as the converse of competitive exclusion, meta- analyses of presence-absence matrices simultaneously support the ubiquity of exclusive distributions and indicate that most ecological systems are nested. I show why these apparently contradictory patterns are not mutually exclusive. Patterns of nestedness can result from multiple processes; without understanding mechanisms, nestedness analysis is unlikely to prove useful for conservation. I study algorithms that randomize presence-absence matrices. Two commonly used algorithms generate biased statistical distributions and should be abandoned. I test for community-wide character displacement in wing length and talon size among Accipiter hawks. I also assess whether subspecific variation in wing length is predictable from community composition. I find limited evidence of community-wide character displacement for wing length, but talon size, which relates directly to resource use, shows larger minimum and more equal size ratios than predicted. I find no evidence of competitively driven change in wing length. These findings demonstrate the importance of examining traits directly related to function. I cannot determine whether community-wide character displacement of talon size results from ecological character displacement, species assortment, or both. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. A COMPARISON OF MATRIX RANDOMIZATION ALGORITHMS .................................1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1 METHODS............................................................................................................................3 RESULTS..............................................................................................................................5 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................7 2. AN EXAMINATION OF SPECIES CO-OCCURRENCE PATTERNS.................................10 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................11 METHODS..........................................................................................................................13 RESULTS............................................................................................................................15 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................17 3. PATTERNS AND CAUSES OF NESTEDNESS....................................................................27 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................28 METHODS..........................................................................................................................31 RESULTS............................................................................................................................35 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................36 4. MORPHOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN THE GENUS ACCIPITER .........................................44 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................44 METHODS..........................................................................................................................46 RESULTS............................................................................................................................49 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................50 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................53
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KEY of ABBREVIATIONS a 1-10, A= C10-15, A
    HERITAGE EXPEDITIONS SECRETS OF MELANESIA #1959 24 October - 4 November 2019 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 Day 11 Day 12 Day 13 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16 Day 17 Day 18 Day 19 Day 20 Day 21 Day 22 Day 23 Day 24 Day 25 Day 26 Day 27 Day 28 Day 29 Day 30 Species Area of Occurrence MELANESIAN MEGAPODE 1 PNG H 1 H KEY OF ABBREVIATIONS Megapodius eremita VANUATU MEGAPODE 2 VAN 1 Megapodius layardi A 1-10, A= c10-15, A- about 15-30, A+ c80-100, PACIFIC BLACK DUCK 3 PNG B 10-100, B= more than a hundred, Anas superciliosa B- low hundreds, C 100-1000, C- low thousands, SPOTTED WHISTLING DUCK 4 Dendrocygna guttata C+ high thousands, D tens of thousands (i.e. 10,000- WANDERING WHISTLING DUCK 100,000), D= more than ten thousand, D- low tens of 5 PNG Dendrocygna arcuata thousands, D+ high tens of thousands, E hundreds of RADJAH SHELDUCK 6 Tadorna radjah thousands (i.e. 100,000-1,000,000), H Heard Only VANUATU PETREL 7 VAN Pterodroma occulta MAGNIFICENT PETREL 8 VAN 2 Pterodroma (brevipes) magnificens COLLARD PETREL 9 VAN Pterodroma brevipes TAHITI PETREL 10 R 1 Pseudobulweria rostrata BECK'S PETREL 11 PNG Pseudobulweria becki STREAKED SHEARWATER 12 PNG Calonectris leucomelas CHRISTMAS SHEARWATER 13 R Puffinus nativitatis WEDGE-TAILED SHEARWATER 14 R A A 3 Puffinus pacificus TROPICAL SHEARWATER 15 R Puffinus balloni HEINROTH'S SHEARWATER 16 PNG, SOL 1 Puffinus heinrothi SHORT-TAILED SHEARWATER 17 R Puffinus tenuirostris FLESH-FOOTED SHEARWATER 18 R Puffinus carneipes BULWER'S PETREL 19 R Bulweria bulwerii WILSON'S STORM-PETREL
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 29 Number 1 April 2011
    BOOBOOK JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALASIAN RAPTOR ASSOCIATION Volume 29 Number 1 April 2011 ARA CONTACTS President: Victor Hurley 0427 238 898 [email protected] Secretary Nick Mooney 0427 826 922 [email protected] Treasurer VACANT Webmaster VACANT Editor, Boobook Dr Stephen Debus 02 6772 1710 (ah) [email protected] Boobook production Hugo Phillipps Area Representatives: ACT Mr Jerry Olsen [email protected] NSW Dr Rod Kavanagh [email protected] NT Mr Ray Chatto [email protected] Qld Mr Stacey McLean [email protected] SA Mr Ian Falkenberg [email protected] WA Mr Jonny Schoenjahn [email protected] Tas Mr Nick Mooney [email protected] Vic Mr David Whelan [email protected] New Zealand VACANT PNG/Indonesia Dr David Bishop [email protected] Other BOPWatch liaison Victor Hurley [email protected] Editor, Circus Victor Hurley Captive raptor advisor Michelle Manhal 0418 387 424 [email protected] Education advisor Greg Czechura 07 3840 7642 (bh) [email protected] Raptor management Nick Mooney 0427 826 922 [email protected] advisor Membership enquiries Membership Officer, Birds Australia, Suite 2-05, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053 Ph. 1300 730 075, [email protected] Annual subscription $A30 single membership, $A35 family and $A45 for institutions, due on 1 January. Bankcard and MasterCard can be debited by prior arrangement. Website: www.birdsaustralia.com.au/ara The aims of the Association are the study, conservation and management of diurnal and nocturnal raptors of the Australasian Faunal Region.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCLAIMER the IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity And
    DISCLAIMER The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services is composed of 1) a Summary for Policymakers (SPM), approved by the IPBES Plenary at its 7th session in May 2019 in Paris, France (IPBES-7); and 2) a set of six Chapters, accepted by the IPBES Plenary. This document contains the draft Glossary of the IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Governments and all observers at IPBES-7 had access to these draft chapters eight weeks prior to IPBES-7. Governments accepted the Chapters at IPBES-7 based on the understanding that revisions made to the SPM during the Plenary, as a result of the dialogue between Governments and scientists, would be reflected in the final Chapters. IPBES typically releases its Chapters publicly only in their final form, which implies a delay of several months post Plenary. However, in light of the high interest for the Chapters, IPBES is releasing the six Chapters early (31 May 2019) in a draft form. Authors of the reports are currently working to reflect all the changes made to the Summary for Policymakers during the Plenary to the Chapters, and to perform final copyediting. The final version of the Chapters will be posted later in 2019. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps used in the present report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Links Between the Theory of Island Biogeography and Some Other
    How Consideration of Islands Has Inspired Mainstream Ecology: Links Between the Theory of Island Biogeography and Some Other Key Theories BH Warren, National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France RE Ricklefs, University of Missouri at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States C Thébaud, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France D Gravel, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada N Mouquet, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Abstract The passing of the 50th anniversary of the theory of island biogeography (IBT) has helped spur a new wave of interest in the biology of islands. Despite the longstanding acclaim of MacArthur and Wilson’s (1963, 1967) theory, the breadth of its influence in mainstream ecology today is easily overlooked. Here we summarize some of the main links between IBT and subsequent developments in ecology. These include not only modifications to the core model to incorporate greater biological complexity, but also the role of IBT in inspiring two other quantitative theories that are at least as broad in relevance—metapopulation theory and ecological neutral theory. Using habitat fragmentation and life-history evolution as examples, we also argue that a significant legacy of IBT has been in shaping and unifying ecological schools of thought. Recent years have seen a surge in interest in island biology and island biogeography theory (IBT; Losos and Ricklefs, 2010; Santos et al., 2016; Patino et al., 2017; Whittaker et al., 2017), partly motivated by the 40th and 50th anniversaries of the Core IBT model (MacArthur and Wilson, 1963) and the monograph that expanded on this model with related ideas (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Codistributed Lineages of Feather Lice Show
    CODISTRIBUTED LINEAGES OF FEATHER LICE SHOW DIFFERENT PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS A Dissertation by THERESE ANNE CATANACH Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Nova J. Silvy Co-Chair of Committee, Robert A. McCleery Committee Members, Jessica E. Light Julio Bernal Head of Department, Michael P. Masser August 2017 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Copyright 2017 Therese A. Catanach ABSTRACT Recent molecular phylogenies have suggested that hawks (Accipitridae) and falcons (Falconidae) form 2 distantly related groups within birds. Avian feather lice have often been used as a model for comparing host and parasite phylogenies, and in some cases there is significant congruence between them. Using 1 mitochondrial and 3 nuclear genes, I inferred a phylogeny for the feather louse genus Degeeriella (which are all obligate raptor ectoparasites) and related genera. This phylogeny indicated that Degeeriella is polyphyletic, with lice from falcons and hawks forming 2 distinct clades. Falcon lice were sister to lice from African woodpeckers, while Capraiella, a genus of lice from rollers lice, was embedded within Degeeriella from hawks. This phylogeny showed significant geographic structure, with host geography playing a larger role than host taxonomy in explaining louse phylogeny, particularly within clades of closely related lice. However, the louse phylogeny broadly reflects host phylogeny, for example Accipiter lice form a distinct clade. Unlike most bird species, individual kingfisher species (Aves: Alcidae) are typically parasitized by 1 of 3 genera of lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera). These lice partition hosts by subfamily: Alcedoecus and Emersoniella parasitize Daceloninae whereas Alcedoffula parasitizes both Alcedininae and Cerylinae.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essay: Geoedaphics and Island Biogeography for Vascular Plants A
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 13 | Issue 1 Article 11 1991 An Essay: Geoedaphics and Island Biogeography for Vascular Plants A. R. Kruckerberg University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Kruckerberg, A. R. (1991) "An Essay: Geoedaphics and Island Biogeography for Vascular Plants," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 13: Iss. 1, Article 11. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol13/iss1/11 ALISO 13(1), 1991, pp. 225-238 AN ESSAY: GEOEDAPHICS AND ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY FOR VASCULAR PLANTS1 A. R. KRUCKEBERG Department of Botany, KB-15 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 ABSTRAcr "Islands" ofdiscontinuity in the distribution ofplants are common in mainland (continental) regions. Such discontinuities should be amenable to testing the tenets of MacArthur and Wilson's island biogeography theory. Mainland gaps are often the result of discontinuities in various geological attributes-the geoedaphic syndrome of topography, lithology and soils. To discover ifgeoedaphically caused patterns of isolation are congruent with island biogeography theory, the effects of topographic discontinuity on plant distributions are examined first. Then a similar inspection is made of discon­ tinuities in parent materials and soils. Parallels as well as differences are detected, indicating that island biogeography theory may be applied to mainland discontinuities, but with certain reservations. Key words: acid (sterile) soils, edaphic islands, endemism, geoedaphics, granite outcrops, island bio- geography, mainland islands, serpentine, speciation, topographic islands, ultramafic, vas­ cular plants, vernal pools. INTRODUCTION "Insularity is ... a universal feature of biogeography"-MacArthur and Wilson ( 196 7) Do topographic and edaphic islands in a "sea" of mainland normal environ­ ments fit the model for oceanic islands? There is good reason to think so, both from classic and recent biogeographic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Avian Biology JAV-00869 Wang, N
    Journal of Avian Biology JAV-00869 Wang, N. and Kimball, R. T. 2016. Re-evaluating the distribution of cooperative breeding in birds: is it tightly linked with altriciality? – J. Avian Biol. doi: 10.1111/jav.00869 Supplementary material Appendix 1. Table A1. The characteristics of the 9993 species based on Jetz et al. (2012) Order Species Criteria1 Developmental K K+S K+S+I LB Mode ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter albogularis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter badius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter bicolor 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter brachyurus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter brevipes 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter butleri 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter castanilius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter chilensis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter chionogaster 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter cirrocephalus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter collaris 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter cooperii 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythrauchen 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythronemius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythropus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter fasciatus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter francesiae 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gentilis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter griseiceps 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gularis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gundlachi 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter haplochrous 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter henicogrammus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter henstii 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter imitator 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Insular Biogeography and the Distribution of Boreal Birds and Mammals James H
    Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 2 Intermountain Biogeography: A Symposium Article 14 3-1-1978 The theory of insular biogeography and the distribution of boreal birds and mammals James H. Brown Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Recommended Citation Brown, James H. (1978) "The theory of insular biogeography and the distribution of boreal birds and mammals," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 2 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol2/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE THEORY OF INSULAR BIOGEOGRAPHY AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF BOREAL BIRDS AND MAMMALS James H. Brown 1 Abstract.—The present paper compares the distribution of boreal birds and mammals among the isolated mountain ranges of the Great Basin and relates those patterns to the developing theory of insular biogeography. The results indicate that the distribution of permanent resident bird species represents an approximate equilib- rium between contemporary rates of colonization and extinction. A shallow slope of the species-area curve (Z = 0.165), no significant reduction in numbers of species as a function of insular isolation (distance to nearest conti- nent), and a strong dependence of species diversity on habitat diversity all suggest that immigration rates of bo- real birds are sufficiently high to maintain populations on almost all islands where there are appropriate habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Melanesia 2015 Report by Adam Walleyn
    Melanesia Discover and Secrets of Melanesia: Birding Melanesia 2015 Report By Adam Walleyn Cardinal Lory pair. Copyright Adrian Hayward The 2015 Melanesian Birding trip was another great success. The year will probably long be remembered for one of the worst droughts ever and while the dry and windy conditions made birding more difficult than usual, we persevered and ended up with an incredible tally of endemics, many of them amongst the most poorly known birds in the world! This incredible itinerary takes in part of the north coast of Papua New Guinea and all of the main islands of the Bismarcks, Solomons and Vanuatu, along with many of the smaller ones. This region is one of the world’s most avian endemic-rich hotspots and is largely inaccessible and unvisited by birders. Amongst 267 species, highlights this year included Superb Pitta sitting right in the open, an unexpected Manus Fantail, one of the first observations of Mussau Triller, a stunning Solomons Nightjar, and incredible diversity of fruit doves (12 species), imperial pigeons (12 species), myzomelas (11 species) and of course white-eyes (10 species). The trip started off with a nice dinner in Madang and then our first of many early mornings to bird a patch of forest not far from town. Bird activity was great this morning and there were a number of fruiting trees which allowed good views of two species of birds of paradise - Lesser Bird of Paradise and Glossy-mantled Manucode. Other nice birds in the fruiting trees included Orange-bellied and Pink-spotted Fruit Dove, Zoe’s Imperial Pigeon, Orange-breasted Fig Parrot, and numerous Golden Myna.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Insular Ecology and Biogeography - Harold Heatwole
    OCEANS AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS- Vol. II - History of Insular Ecology and Biogeography - Harold Heatwole HISTORY OF INSULAR ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY Harold Heatwole North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Keywords: islands; insular dynamics; One Tree Island; Aristotle; Darwin; Wallace; equilibrium theory; biogeography; immigration; extinction; species-turnover; stochasticism; determinism; null hypotheses; trophic structure; transfer organisms; assembly rules; energetics. Contents 1. Ancient and Medieval Concepts: the Birth of Insular Biogeography 2. Darwin and Wallace: the Dawn of the Modern Era 3. Genetics and Insular Biogeography 4. MacArthur and Wilson: the Equilibrium Theory of Insular Biogeography 5. Documenting and Testing the Equilibrium Theory 6. Modifying the Equilibrium Theory 7. Determinism versus Stochasticism in Insular Communities 8. Insular Energetics and Trophic Structure Stability Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary In ancient times, belief in spontaneous generation and divine creation dominated thinking about insular biotas. Weaknesses in these theories let to questioning of those ideas, first by clergy and later by scientists, culminating in Darwin's and Wallace's postulation of evolution through natural selection. MacArthur and Wilson presented a dynamic equilibrium model of insular ecology and biogeography that represented the number of species on an island as an equilibrium between immigration and extinction rates, as influenced by insular sizes and distances from mainlands. This model has been tested and found generally true but requiring minor modifications, such as accounting for disturbancesUNESCO affecting the equilibrium nu–mber. EOLSS There has been basic controversy as to whether insular biotas reflect deterministic or stochastic processes. It is likely that neither extreme SAMPLEis completely correct but rather CHAPTERS the two kinds of processes interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbance and Resilience in the Luquillo Experimental Forest
    Biological Conservation 253 (2021) 108891 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Disturbance and resilience in the Luquillo Experimental Forest Jess K. Zimmerman a,*, Tana E. Wood b, Grizelle Gonzalez´ b, Alonso Ramirez c, Whendee L. Silver d, Maria Uriarte e, Michael R. Willig f, Robert B. Waide g, Ariel E. Lugo b a Department of Environmental Science, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, PR 00921, Puerto Rico b USDA Forest Service International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Río Piedras, PR 00926, Puerto Rico c Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America d Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America e Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, United States of America f Institute of the Environment and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, United States of America g Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States of America ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Luquillo Experimental Forest (LEF) has a long history of research on tropical forestry, ecology, and con­ Biogeochemistry servation, dating as far back as the early 19th Century. Scientificsurveys conducted by early explorers of Puerto Climate change Rico, followed by United States institutions contributed early understanding of biogeography, species endemism, Drought and tropical soil characteristics. Research in the second half of the 1900s established the LEF as an exemplar of Food web forest management and restoration research in the tropics. Research conducted as part of a radiation experiment Gamma radiation Hurricane funded by the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1960s on forest metabolism established the field of ecosystem Landslide ecology in the tropics.
    [Show full text]