DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 4 Free Particle and Dirac Normalization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 4 Free Particle and Dirac Normalization Chapter 4 Free particle and Dirac normalization 4.1 Fourier modes and the free particle We have seen that under boundary conditions we obtain discrete values for some phys- ical quantities as energy. Our interest focus now on a particle free to move over the whole space (which we shall consider it one-dimensional). In case in which there are not boundary conditions, the wave function does not depend on discrete values. The entire wave packet is instead described by Fourier integrals as 1 Z 1 (x) = dκ φ~(κ)eiκx: (4.1.1) 2π −∞ We can notice that (x) is a superposition of different waves ~(x; k) = φ~(κ)eiκx for different values of κ or momentum. Consider one of these wave functions. The larger φ~(κ) is, for a given value of κ, the closer (x) is described by a plane wave eiκx, which has a definite momentum p = ~κ. This should describe a particle with momentum very close to p if measured. For an infinite value of (p), (x) is given exactly by eipx=~. This means that measuring a momentum p and getting the exact value of p0 (∆p = 0) implies that (x) = eip0x=~, for which ∆x ! 1. Therefore, we note that Heisenberg uncertainty is inclosed in Fourier decomposition. Let us do the opposite by localizing a particle in a point x0 in space but by using waves with definite momentum. For that we need to add other Fourier components close to 2 CHAPTER 4. FREE PARTICLE AND DIRAC NORMALIZATION momentum p0, such that they add at x = x0 but increase the total wave's width. At the end, we obtain a wave packet localized in x = x0 but delocalized in momentum. This is ∆x ! 0 implies ∆p ! 1. This is the free particle which is a solution of the Schr¨odingerequation 2 − ~ (x)00 = E (x); (4.1.2) 2m q 2mE i 2 ipx= which solution is given by (x) = e ~ = e ~. Now, we have seen that the probability to find a particle in position between x and x ± dx is given by j (x)j2dx. How can we compute the corresponding probability to find a particle with momentum between p and p ± dp? This is given by the Parseval Theorem, which states that if 1 Z 1 1 Z 1 (x) = p dκ φ~(κ)eiκx = p dp φ(p)eipx=~; (4.1.3) 2π −∞ 2π~ −∞ then Z 1 Z 1 dxj (x)j2 = dpjφ(p)j2: (4.1.4) −∞ −∞ From this it follows that the probability to find a particle with momentum width dp is given by jφ(p)j2. If (x) is normalized such that the probability to find a particle in the whole space equals to one, then φ(p) is automatically normalized as well. Notice that a plane wave eip0x=~ resembles the motion of a classical particle with momentum p0 for which we can not determine its position. By a superposition of different waves with a peak on p0, the position will be determined by the corresponding phases. A particle in motion is then just a bunch of waves for which the phases rotate and the position x changes accordingly. This can be estimated as follows. Consider a bunch of flat waves eipx=~ with different values of momentum. The total wave packet is given by 1 Z (x) = p dpφ~(p)eipx=~: (4.1.5) 2π~ 4.1. Fourier modes and the free particle 3 ~ For a momentum function φ(p) mainly localized around p0, we can estimate that Z ipx= (x) ∼ φ~(p) e ~ dp; (4.1.6) where assuming that the momentum p is constant within that range, i.e., p = c. Then we conclude that Z icx= ipx= (x) ∼ A · 2 e ~dp ∼ Ae~ ~; (4.1.7) − which indeed has a momentum uncertainty ∆p = 2 and the wave function (x) is very close to a plane wave. The largest φ(p) is, the closest (x) resembles a plane wave.. In the limit, for ∆p ! 0 (by taking ! 0), we expect that ∆x ! 1. How can we show that? What we know by sure, is that Heinsenberg uncertainty is enclosed in Fourier de- composition. Schematically we can think about it: consider a wave packet centered around the position x0. This represents a particle localized in x0. There is an uncer- tainty in position and momentum. If we want to reduce the uncertainty in position ∆x, it is necessary to add more waves such that the pick around x0 becomes thinner but larger than before. That would imply the addition of waves with more different values of momentum. The result is that ∆x is reduced but ∆p is enlarged. We can also see that a plane wave is related to a free particle by directly solving Schr¨odingerequation. This reads, 2 − ~ (x)00(x) = E (x); (4.1.8) 2m which solution is given by p 2mE i x ip0x= (x) = e ~ = e ~; (4.1.9) for a particle with a momentum p0. The uncertainty in momentum vanishes, while in position is undetermined. In order to reduce ∆x we should increase ∆p by adding more Fourier components, 1 Z 1 (x) = p dp φ(p) eipx=~; (4.1.10) 2π~ −∞ 4 CHAPTER 4. FREE PARTICLE AND DIRAC NORMALIZATION which is also a solution of Sch¨odingerequation. Notice that φ(p) is the identity function for a free particle with a fixed-momentum p. Now, we have learnt how to compute the probability to find a particle between x and x + dx. This is given by j (x)j2dx. Given such function, how can we compute the probability to find a particle with some momentum range? The answer comes from Parseval theorem, which states that if 1 Z 1 (x) = dp eipxφ(p); (4.1.11) 2π~ −∞ then Z 1 Z 1 j (x)j2 dx = jφ(p)2 dp; (4.1.12) −∞ −∞ from which it is concluded that R jφ(p)j2dp = 1, and then that jφ(p)j2 dp measures the probability to find a particle with momentum between p and p + dp. 4.1.1 Measuring uncertainties Consider a particle described by the wave packet 4.1.11, such that position and mo- mentum are determined upon some uncertainty ∆x and ∆p. By changing the phases such that at some time t = t0, the wave packet is centered around x0 and at t = t1 it is centered around x = x1. Such wave packet is interpreted a large scales as teh classical particle with momentum p. Notice that the change of phases modifies the position coordinate around which the wave packet has a pick. Momentum continues to have the same uncertainty as far as the wave width in position does not change. Observation: Measure uncertainty 6= Heisenberg uncertainty. This means that under \exactly" the same conditions, you can measure position and momentum with an experimental error given by ∆xexp, but get different values for both quantities at different times. Heisenberg uncertainty ∆x is the range of possible different values you measure, plus the corresponding experimental uncertainty. 4.2. Wave collapse 5 4.2 Wave collapse Let us say that (x) is the wave packet associated to some physical system on which we perform a measurement. Let us assume for the moment, a very concise case in which the wave packet is given by X (x) = An n(x); (4.2.1) n where n(x) is a wave packet with a pick around xn. assume as well that xi 6= xj for all i; j and that if there exists a position xf such that i(xf ) = j(xf ), then their value is very small. Therefore, the wavepacket 4.2.1 presents some maxima related to a larger probability to find the particle in such position (actually there are n such picks). Now, let us think that an experiment is performed and we get that the particle was localized around (with an experimental error given by ∆xexp) xi. If we perform the experiment one more time, it is impossible that the particle could be localized in some region around another point different that xi. We say that the wave function (x) collapses to i(x) after measurement. It should be clear that by softening the above conditions, we can get that the collapse of the wave packet is another packet conformed by a smaller number of com- ponents, i.e., P (x) −! j j(x), where the index j does not run over all possible values as at the beginning. Maybe you are now questioning many things. One important question you must have in mind, is the possible implications on Heisenberg uncertainty of the collapse wave by measuring with some experimental uncertainty. In particular, let us think what happens if we measure a position with an experimental uncertainty smaller than the original uncertainty attributed to the particle. Before the wave collapses, Heisenberg uncertainty is ∆x∆p ≥ ~=2. For the collapsed wave, the uncertainty bound remains, but now with respect to the new function, i.e., 6 CHAPTER 4. FREE PARTICLE AND DIRAC NORMALIZATION ∆~x∆~p ≥ ~=2. The uncertainty in the position after measuring, is given by the experi- mental uncertainty ∆xexp which is much smaller than ∆x, then ∆~x∆~p = ∆x ∆~p ≥ ~; (4.2.2) exp 2 ) ∆~p ≥ ~ >> ~ = ∆p: (4.2.3) 2∆xexp 2∆x Therefore, by reducing the uncertainty in position by measuring, we actually increase the uncertainty in momentum with respect to the original value. 4.2.1 Example: Let our brains be twisted! Consider a wave packet passing through a wall with a single slit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statistics of a Free Single Quantum Particle at a Finite
    STATISTICS OF A FREE SINGLE QUANTUM PARTICLE AT A FINITE TEMPERATURE JIAN-PING PENG Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China Abstract We present a model to study the statistics of a single structureless quantum particle freely moving in a space at a finite temperature. It is shown that the quantum particle feels the temperature and can exchange energy with its environment in the form of heat transfer. The underlying mechanism is diffraction at the edge of the wave front of its matter wave. Expressions of energy and entropy of the particle are obtained for the irreversible process. Keywords: Quantum particle at a finite temperature, Thermodynamics of a single quantum particle PACS: 05.30.-d, 02.70.Rr 1 Quantum mechanics is the theoretical framework that describes phenomena on the microscopic level and is exact at zero temperature. The fundamental statistical character in quantum mechanics, due to the Heisenberg uncertainty relation, is unrelated to temperature. On the other hand, temperature is generally believed to have no microscopic meaning and can only be conceived at the macroscopic level. For instance, one can define the energy of a single quantum particle, but one can not ascribe a temperature to it. However, it is physically meaningful to place a single quantum particle in a box or let it move in a space where temperature is well-defined. This raises the well-known question: How a single quantum particle feels the temperature and what is the consequence? The question is particular important and interesting, since experimental techniques in recent years have improved to such an extent that direct measurement of electron dynamics is possible.1,2,3 It should also closely related to the question on the applicability of the thermodynamics to small systems on the nanometer scale.4 We present here a model to study the behavior of a structureless quantum particle moving freely in a space at a nonzero temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle*
    OpenStax-CNX module: m58578 1 The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle* OpenStax This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 Abstract By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Describe the physical meaning of the position-momentum uncertainty relation • Explain the origins of the uncertainty principle in quantum theory • Describe the physical meaning of the energy-time uncertainty relation Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a key principle in quantum mechanics. Very roughly, it states that if we know everything about where a particle is located (the uncertainty of position is small), we know nothing about its momentum (the uncertainty of momentum is large), and vice versa. Versions of the uncertainty principle also exist for other quantities as well, such as energy and time. We discuss the momentum-position and energy-time uncertainty principles separately. 1 Momentum and Position To illustrate the momentum-position uncertainty principle, consider a free particle that moves along the x- direction. The particle moves with a constant velocity u and momentum p = mu. According to de Broglie's relations, p = }k and E = }!. As discussed in the previous section, the wave function for this particle is given by −i(! t−k x) −i ! t i k x k (x; t) = A [cos (! t − k x) − i sin (! t − k x)] = Ae = Ae e (1) 2 2 and the probability density j k (x; t) j = A is uniform and independent of time. The particle is equally likely to be found anywhere along the x-axis but has denite values of wavelength and wave number, and therefore momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • The S-Matrix Formulation of Quantum Statistical Mechanics, with Application to Cold Quantum Gas
    THE S-MATRIX FORMULATION OF QUANTUM STATISTICAL MECHANICS, WITH APPLICATION TO COLD QUANTUM GAS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Pye Ton How August 2011 c 2011 Pye Ton How ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE S-MATRIX FORMULATION OF QUANTUM STATISTICAL MECHANICS, WITH APPLICATION TO COLD QUANTUM GAS Pye Ton How, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 A novel formalism of quantum statistical mechanics, based on the zero-temperature S-matrix of the quantum system, is presented in this thesis. In our new formalism, the lowest order approximation (“two-body approximation”) corresponds to the ex- act resummation of all binary collision terms, and can be expressed as an integral equation reminiscent of the thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz (TBA). Two applica- tions of this formalism are explored: the critical point of a weakly-interacting Bose gas in two dimensions, and the scaling behavior of quantum gases at the unitary limit in two and three spatial dimensions. We found that a weakly-interacting 2D Bose gas undergoes a superfluid transition at T 2πn/[m log(2π/mg)], where n c ≈ is the number density, m the mass of a particle, and g the coupling. In the unitary limit where the coupling g diverges, the two-body kernel of our integral equation has simple forms in both two and three spatial dimensions, and we were able to solve the integral equation numerically. Various scaling functions in the unitary limit are defined (as functions of µ/T ) and computed from the numerical solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 6: the Free Particle
    Class 6: The free particle A free particle is one on which no forces act, i.e. the potential energy can be taken to be zero everywhere. The time independent Schrödinger equation for the free particle is ℏ2d 2 ψ − = Eψ . (6.1) 2m dx 2 Since the potential is zero everywhere, physically meaningful solutions exist only for E ≥ 0. For each value of E > 0, there are two linearly independent solutions ψ ( x) = e ±ikx , (6.2) where 2mE k = . (6.3) ℏ Putting in the time dependence, the solution for energy E is Ψ( x, t) = Aei( kx−ω t) + Be i( − kx − ω t ) , (6.4) where A and B are complex constants, and Eℏ k 2 ω = = . (6.5) ℏ 2m The first term on the right hand side of equation (6.4) describes a wave moving in the direction of x increasing, and the second term describes a wave moving in the opposite direction. By applying the momentum operator to each of the travelling wave functions, we see that they have momenta p= ℏ k and p= − ℏ k , which is consistent with the de Broglie relation. So far we have taken k to be positive. Both waves can be encompassed by the same expression if we allow k to take negative values, Ψ( x, t) = Ae i( kx−ω t ) . (6.6) From the dispersion relation in equation (6.5), we see that the phase velocity of the waves is ω ℏk v = = , (6.7) p k2 m which differs from the classical particle velocity, 1 pℏ k v = = , (6.8) c m m by a factor of 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem: Evolution of a Free Gaussian Wavepacket Consider a Free Particle
    Problem: Evolution of a free Gaussian wavepacket Consider a free particle which is described at t = 0 by the normalized Gaussian wave function µ ¶1=4 2a 2 ª(x; 0) = e¡ax : ¼ The normalization factor is easy to obtain. We wish to ¯nd its time evolution. How does one do this ? Remember the recipe in quantum mechanics. We expand the given wave func- tion in terms of the energy eigenfunctions and we know how individual energy eigenfunctions evolve. We then reconstruct the wave function at a later time t by superposing the parts with appropriate phase factors. For a free particle H = p2=(2m) and therefore, momentum eigenfunctions are also energy eigenfunctions. So it is the mathematics of Fourier transforms! It is straightforward to ¯nd ©(k; 0) the Fourier transform of ª(x; 0): Z 1 dk ª(x; 0) = p ©(k; 0) eikx : ¡1 2¼ Recall that the Fourier transform of a Gaussian is a Gaussian. Z 1 dx Á(k) ´ ©(k; 0) = p ª(x; 0) e¡ikx (1.1) ¡1 2¼ µ ¶ µ ¶ 1=4 Z 1 1=4 2 1 2a ¡ikx ¡ax2 1 ¡ k = p dx e e = e 4a (1.2) 2¼ ¼ ¡1 2¼a What this says is that the Gaussian spatial wave function is a superposition of di®erent momenta with the probability of ¯nding the momentum between k1 and k1 + dk being pro- 2 portional to exp(¡k1=(2a)) dk. So the initial wave function is a superposition of di®erent plane waves with di®erent coef- ¯cients (usually called amplitudes).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Wave Properties of Particles
    Chapter 3 Wave Properties of Particles Overview of Chapter 3 Einstein introduced us to the particle properties of waves in 1905 (photoelectric effect). Compton scattering of x-rays by electrons (which we skipped in Chapter 2) confirmed Einstein's theories. You ought to ask "Is there a converse?" Do particles have wave properties? De Broglie postulated wave properties of particles in his thesis in 1924, based partly on the idea that if waves can behave like particles, then particles should be able to behave like waves. Werner Heisenberg and a little later Erwin Schrödinger developed theories based on the wave properties of particles. In 1927, Davisson and Germer confirmed the wave properties of particles by diffracting electrons from a nickel single crystal. 3.1 de Broglie Waves Recall that a photon has energy E=hf, momentum p=hf/c=h/, and a wavelength =h/p. De Broglie postulated that these equations also apply to particles. In particular, a particle of mass m moving with velocity v has a de Broglie wavelength of h λ = . mv where m is the relativistic mass m m = 0 . 1-v22/ c In other words, it may be necessary to use the relativistic momentum in =h/mv=h/p. In order for us to observe a particle's wave properties, the de Broglie wavelength must be comparable to something the particle interacts with; e.g. the spacing of a slit or a double slit, or the spacing between periodic arrays of atoms in crystals. The example on page 92 shows how it is "appropriate" to describe an electron in an atom by its wavelength, but not a golf ball in flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Introduction to QM: Free Particle
    Chapter 2 Informal Introduction to QM: Free Particle Remember that in case of light, the probability of nding a photon at a location is given by the square of the square of electric eld at that point. And if there are no sources present in the region, the components of the electric eld are governed by the wave equation (1D case only) ∂2u 1 ∂2u − =0 (2.1) ∂x2 c2 ∂t2 Note the features of the solutions of this dierential equation: 1. The simplest solutions are harmonic, that is u ∼ exp [i (kx − ωt)] where ω = c |k|. This function represents the probability amplitude of photons with energy ω and momentum k. 2. Superposition principle holds, that is if u1 = exp [i (k1x − ω1t)] and u2 = exp [i (k2x − ω2t)] are two solutions of equation 2.1 then c1u1 + c2u2 is also a solution of the equation 2.1. 3. A general solution of the equation 2.1 is given by ˆ ∞ u = A(k) exp [i (kx − ωt)] dk. −∞ Now, by analogy, the rules for matter particles may be found. The functions representing matter waves will be called wave functions. £ First, the wave function ψ(x, t)=A exp [i(px − Et)/] 8 represents a particle with momentum p and energy E = p2/2m. Then, the probability density function P (x, t) for nding the particle at x at time t is given by P (x, t)=|ψ(x, t)|2 = |A|2 . Note that the probability distribution function is independent of both x and t. £ Assume that superposition of the waves hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Zitterbewegung in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
    Zitterbewegung in relativistic quantum mechanics Alexander J. Silenko∗ Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China, Research Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University, Minsk 220030, Belarus Abstract Zitterbewegung of massive and massless scalar bosons and a massive Proca (spin-1) boson is analyzed. The results previously obtained for a Dirac fermion are considered. The equations describing the evolution of the velocity and position of the scalar boson in the generalized Feshbach- Villars representation and the corresponding equations for the massive Proca particle in the Sakata- Taketani representation are equivalent to each other and to the well-known equations for the Dirac particle. However, Zitterbewegung does not appear in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. Since the position and velocity operators in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation and their transforms to other representations are the quantum-mechanical counterparts of the corresponding classical variables, Zitterbewegung is not observable. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 03.65.Ta Keywords: quantum mechanics; Zitterbewegung ∗ [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION Zitterbewegung belongs to the most important and widely discussed problems of quantum mechanics (QM). It is a well-known effect consisting in a superfast trembling motion of a free particle. This effect has been first described by Schr¨odinger[1] and is also known for a scalar particle [2, 3]. There are plenty of works devoted to Zitterbewegung. In our study, only papers presenting a correct analysis of the observability of this effect are discussed. The correct conclusions about the origin and observability of this effect have been made in Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 22 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Background
    Lecture 22 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Background Why study relativistic quantum mechanics? 1 Many experimental phenomena cannot be understood within purely non-relativistic domain. e.g. quantum mechanical spin, emergence of new sub-atomic particles, etc. 2 New phenomena appear at relativistic velocities. e.g. particle production, antiparticles, etc. 3 Aesthetically and intellectually it would be profoundly unsatisfactory if relativity and quantum mechanics could not be united. Background When is a particle relativistic? 1 When velocity approaches speed of light c or, more intrinsically, when energy is large compared to rest mass energy, mc2. e.g. protons at CERN are accelerated to energies of ca. 300GeV (1GeV= 109eV) much larger than rest mass energy, 0.94 GeV. 2 Photons have zero rest mass and always travel at the speed of light – they are never non-relativistic! Background What new phenomena occur? 1 Particle production e.g. electron-positron pairs by energetic γ-rays in matter. 2 Vacuum instability: If binding energy of electron 2 4 Z e m 2 Ebind = > 2mc 2!2 a nucleus with initially no electrons is instantly screened by creation of electron/positron pairs from vacuum 3 Spin: emerges naturally from relativistic formulation Background When does relativity intrude on QM? 1 When E mc2, i.e. p mc kin ∼ ∼ 2 From uncertainty relation, ∆x∆p > h, this translates to a length h ∆x > = λ mc c the Compton wavelength. 3 for massless particles, λc = , i.e. relativity always important for, e.g., photons. ∞ Relativistic quantum mechanics: outline
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
    Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Dipankar Chakrabarti Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India (Dated: August 6, 2020) 1 I. INTRODUCTION Till now we have dealt with non-relativistic quantum mechanics. A free particle satisfying ~p2 Schrodinger equation has the non-relatistic energy E = 2m . Non-relativistc QM is applicable for particles with velocity much smaller than the velocity of light(v << c). But for relativis- tic particles, i.e. particles with velocity comparable to the velocity of light(e.g., electrons in atomic orbits), we need to use relativistic QM. For relativistic QM, we need to formulate a wave equation which is consistent with relativistic transformations(Lorentz transformations) of special theory of relativity. A characteristic feature of relativistic wave equations is that the spin of the particle is built into the theory from the beginning and cannot be added afterwards. (Schrodinger equation does not have any spin information, we need to separately add spin wave function.) it makes a particular relativistic equation applicable to a particular kind of particle (with a specific spin) i.e, a relativistic equation which describes scalar particle(spin=0) cannot be applied for a fermion(spin=1/2) or vector particle(spin=1). Before discussion relativistic QM, let us briefly summarise some features of special theory of relativity here. Specification of an instant of time t and a point ~r = (x, y, z) of ordinary space defines a point in the space-time. We’ll use the notation xµ = (x0, x1, x2, x3) ⇒ xµ = (x0, xi), x0 = ct, µ = 0, 1, 2, 3 and i = 1, 2, 3 x ≡ xµ is called a 4-vector, whereas ~r ≡ xi is a 3-vector(for 4-vector we don’t put the vector sign(→) on top of x.
    [Show full text]
  • Module IV. QUANTUM MECHANICS Planck's Law
    Module IV. QUANTUM MECHANICS Blackbody Radiation: A Blackbody is one which absorbs all the light which is incident on it and re-radiates all those absorbed radiations when it is heated to incandescence (red hot). Blackbody Radiation spectrum: A Blackbody is one which absorbs the entire radiation incident on it and emits all the absorbed radiation when it is hotter. A true blackbody does not exist practically. Many Scientists tried to device an ideal blackbody, however, a blackbody designed by Wien has features very close to the true blackbody. A blackbody at a particular temperature found to emit a radiation of all possible wavelengths. The radiations emitted are analysed and is called blackbody radiation spectrum. Nature of Blackbody radiation Spectrum: The radiations emitted is analysed and the intensity (or the energy density) of emitted radiation is plotted against the wavelength as shown in fig. (i)At a constant temperature, radiations of different wavelengths are emitted out in different quantities. It is a continuous spectrum starting from certain minimum wavelength to maximum wavelength. There exist a particular wavelength (Called휆푚) for which intensity of emitted radiation is maximum. (ii)There are different curves for different temperatures. The intensity emitted radiation increases with the increase of the temperature. (iii) As the temperature of the body increases, the wavelength corresponding to maximum intensity (휆푚) shifts towards lower wavelength side. (iv) The area under the curve gives the total radiant energy. The area under the curve is proportional to the forth power of the absolute temperature. This is called Stefan’s 4th power law [E 훼 푇4].
    [Show full text]
  • Klein-Gordon Equation and Wave Function for Free Particle in Rindler Space-Time
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science (IJARPS) Volume 7, Issue 9, 2020, PP 10-12 ISSN No. (Online) 2349-7882 www.arcjournals.org Klein-Gordon Equation and Wave Function for Free Particle in Rindler Space-Time Sangwha-Yi* Department of Math , Taejon University 300-716 , South Korea *Corresponding Author: Sangwha-Yi, Department of Math, Taejon University 300-716, South Korea Abstract: Klein-Gordon equation is a relativistic wave equation. It treats spinless particle. The wave function cannot use as a probability amplitude. We made Klein-Gordon equation in Rindler space-time. In this paper, we make free particle’s wave function as the solution of Klein-Gordon equation in Rindler space-time. Keywords: Wave Function; Free Particle; Klein-Gordon equation Rindler Space-time; PACS Number: 03.30.+p,03.65 1. INTRODUCTION At first, Klein-Gordon equation is for free particle field in inertial frame. mc 2 21 2 2 0 2ct 2 2 m is free particle’s mass (1) If we write wave function as solution of Klein-Gordon equation for free particle,[3] A0 exp i ( t k x ) A0 is amplitude, is angular frequency, kk is wave number (2) Energy and momentum is in inertial frame,[3] E , pk (3) Hence, energy-momentum relation is[3] E2 22 p 22 c m 24 c 222 k c m 24 c (4) Or angular frequency- wave number relation is 2mc 2 2 k2 (5) c22 2. KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION AND WAVE FUNCTION FOR FREE PARTICLE FIELD IN RINDLER- SPACE-TIME Rindler coordinates are c2 a cc22a ct (10 )sinh(0 ) , x ( 10 )cosh(0 ) ac0 a00 c a yz23, (6) We know Klein-Gordon equation in Rindler space-time.
    [Show full text]