DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Philosophical Foundations of System Dynamics with Buddhist Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing Philosophical Foundations of System Dynamics with Buddhist Philosophy Developing Philosophical Foundations of System Dynamics with Buddhist Philosophy Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Master of Philosophy in System Dynamics (Universitetet i Bergen), Master of Science in System Dynamics (Universidade NOVA de Lisboa) & Master of Science in Business Administration (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen) By Alexander Dorodeiko Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Henk Akkermans Tilburg University, The Netherlands Second Reader: Prof. Erling Moxnes Universitetet i Bergen, Norway August 2019 Abstract This study explores conceptual similarities between System Dynamics and Buddhist philosophy to investigate how the latter can contribute to the development of philosophical foundations of System Dynamics. First, it identifies and reflects on the main concepts underlying the philosophy of System Dynamics. Second, it presents the fundamental concepts of Buddhist philosophy. Third, it analyses how the main concepts of System Dynamics are represented and interpreted in Buddhist philosophy. In doing so, the study grounds itself in the existing findings about conceptual similarities between systems domains and Buddhism and makes a comprehensive up-to-date review of the major publications on the topic. It also presents novel insights not yet discussed in the literature. For example, the discovered consilience of the epistemological stance of System Dynamics and Buddhist philosophy. Finally, the study makes suggestions on how the identified consonant concepts of Buddhist philosophy can be integrated into System Dynamics to improve its theory and modelling practice. 1 Table of Contents Table of Figures……………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………………...5 List of Tables…………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……………..6 1. Introduction…………….………..………..………..………..………..………..…………………..7 2. Methods……..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……………………11 2.1. Literature Search and Selection………..………..………..………..………..……………….12 2.2. Literature Review………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………..14 2.3. Summary and Synthesis of the Reviewed Literature………..………..………..…………….14 2.4. Research Ethics………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………….15 3. Buddhist Philosophy…………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………….16 3.1. Buddhism as Philosophy………..………..………..………..………..………..…………….16 3.2. Historical Background………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……..17 3.2.1. Aryans and Vedas………..………..………..………..………..………..……………..17 3.2.2. Ascetics and Yoga………..………..………..………..………..………..……………..18 3.2.3. The Historical Buddha………..………..………..………..………..………..………..19 3.3. The Main Concepts of Buddhist philosophy………..………..………..………..……………20 3.3.1. Samsara and Nirvana………..………..………..………..………..………..…………20 3.3.2. Karma………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……...21 3.3.3. The Middle Way and the Noble Eightfold Path………..………..………..……………22 3.3.4. The Four Noble Truths………..………..………..………..………..………..………..24 3.3.5. Dependent Origination and Buddhist View on Causality………..………..…………..26 3.3.6. No-self, Impermanence and Suffering………..………..………..………..…………...27 3.3.7. Abhidharma: Theory of dharmas………..………..………..………..………..………27 3.3.8. Emptiness………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……………28 3.3.9. Meditation and Inseparability of Knowledge and Knower………..………..…………29 3.3.10. Buddhist Ethics………..………..………..………..………..………..……………...30 2 4. The Main Concepts of System Dynamics…………..………..………..………..………………...32 4.1. Characteristics of “Normal” Human Thinking………..………..………..………..…………32 4.2. System………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………….33 4.3. Feedback and Feedback Loop………..………..………..………..………..………………...35 4.4. Systems Structure………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………..36 4.5. Stock and Flow………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……………..37 4.6. Systems Behaviour (Dynamics)………………..……………………………………………38 4.7. Idea of a Model and Idealism………..………..………..………..………..………..………...38 4.8. Systems Properties………..………..………..………..………..………..…………………..40 4.9. Systems Thinking………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………..40 4.10. Systems Ethics………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……………41 4.11. System Dynamics Theory of Decision-Making Process and Goal-Oriented Behaviour……43 5. Comparison of System Dynamics and Buddhist Philosophy…………..………..………………45 5.1. “Dependent Origination 1”: Mutual Causality (Feedback) and Systems View………………45 5.1.1. Causality………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………….45 5.1.2. Mutual Causality (Feedback), System and Systems Thinking………..………..………46 5.1.3. Endogenous Explanation (View)………..………..………..………..………..……….47 5.1.4. Process Thinking, Boundaries and Dynamics………..………..………..………..…...47 5.2. “Dependent Origination 2”: Mental Models and Relativity of Knowledge………………….48 5.2.1. Idealism and Dependent Origination………..………..………..………..……………48 5.2.2. Mental Model as Conditioned Knowledge………..………..………..………..……….49 5.2.3. Mental Model and Dependent Origination as Pedagogical Tools………..…………...50 5.3. Integration of Buddhist Dependent Origination and Reflective Practices into SD…………...50 5.4. Mental Models: Enhance or Suspend?………..………..………..………..………..………...52 5.5. “The Promise of System Dynamics” or How Much Religion is There in SD?………..……...55 5.6. Non-Dualism in Buddhist Philosophy and System Dynamics………..………..…………….57 5.6.1. Why is Non-Dualism Characteristic for System Dynamics?………..………..………..57 3 5.6.2. Relevance of the Buddhist Middle Way for System Dynamics………..………..………57 5.7. Middle Way as Negative Feedback… Karma as a Stock………..………..………..………...60 5.8. Time in System Dynamics and Buddhist Philosophy………..………..………..………..…..60 5.9. Systems and Buddhist Ethics………..………..………..………..………..………..………...62 5.9.1. The “Interrelatedness Ethics”………..………..………..………..………..………….62 5.9.2. Decentralization of Self………..………..………..………..………..………………...63 5.9.3. Personal Responsibility………..………..………..………..………..………………...64 5.9.4. Non-Dualism and Systems Ethics………..………..………..………..………..………64 5.9.5. Motivation as Criterion for Evaluation of Human Affairs………..…………………...64 5.10. Unrepresented Concepts………..………..………..………..………..………..…………...65 6. Conclusion and Discussion………..………..………..………..………..………..………………..67 6.1. Key Findings and Contributions………..………..………..………..………..………………67 6.1.1. Reflection on the Foundations of System Dynamics………..………..………..………67 6.1.2. “Systems Domains and Buddhism” Literature Review………..………..…………….67 6.1.3. Conceptual Similarities between System Dynamics and Buddhist Philosophy………..67 6.1.4. Discussion of the Main Insights………..………..………..………..………..………...69 6.2. Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research………..………..………..………...71 References………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…………………73 Appendix A………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………………..77 Appendix B………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………………..88 Appendix C………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……..119 Appendix D………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……..121 Appendix E………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..……..123 4 Table of Figures Figure 1. Two Sides of System Dynamics………..………..………..………..………..………………8 Figure 2. Basic Balancing Feedback Loop………..………..………..………..………..…………….44 Figure 3. Components of a Decision Rule………..………..………..………..………..………..……44 Figure 4. Mutual Causality and Systems View………..………..………..………..………..……….123 Figure 5. Mental Models and Relativity of Knowledge………..………..………..………..……….123 Figure 6. Soteriological Narratives………..………..………..………..………..………..………….124 Figure 7. Non-Dualism………..………..………..………..………..………..………..………..…...124 Figure 8. The “Interrelatedness Ethics”………..………..………..………..………..………..……..124 5 List of Tables Table 1. Details of Literature Search on Topic of Systems Domains and Buddhism Comparison…….78 Table 2. Summaries of Reviewed Publications on Topic of Comparison of Systems Domains and Buddhism……..………..………..………..………..………..……..………..………..……..………..80 Table 3. The Main Concepts of System Dynamics…..………..………..……..………………………88 Table 4. Initial Categorization and List of the Main Concepts of System Dynamics…..…………….119 Table 5. Final Categorization and List of the Main Concepts of System Dynamics…..………..…….121 6 1. Introduction An increasing number of scholars argue that there exist similarities between the ideas of systems domains1 and Buddhism. Macy (1991) states that both Buddhism and General Systems Theory (GST) adopt a holistic perspective and consider causality as intrinsically mutual, with feedback. In her other publication, Macy (1979) suggests that since Buddhist ethics are grounded in its views on causality which are consonant with the ones of systems theory, Buddhist ethics can become the basis for the further development of systems ethics. Varela et al. (2016) suggest that modern science should integrate contemplative practices and the approach for studying cognition from Buddhism. Senge et al. (2008) integrate ideas from systems thinking and Buddhism, arguing that while the former makes a significant leap by departing from the common reductionistic approach to science, it still lacks ethical and spiritual dimensions as well as practical methods for their application which can be provided by Buddhism based on its similarity with systems thinking. Shen & Midgley (2007) explore “the similarities between [Humanistic] Buddhist philosophy and various systems perspectives” (p.168) to “spark debate” (p.167) about the topic in the systems sciences community. Generally, it is suggested that there is a need for further investigation of similarities between systems domains and Buddhism as such can be beneficial for both theoretical development of systems domains as well as their practical application (Bajracharya, 2010; Kim, 2010; Macy,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thinking in Buddhism: Nagarjuna's Middle
    Thinking in Buddhism: Nagarjuna’s Middle Way 1994 Jonah Winters About this Book Any research into a school of thought whose texts are in a foreign language encounters certain difficulties in deciding which words to translate and which ones to leave in the original. It is all the more of an issue when the texts in question are from a language ancient and quite unlike our own. Most of the texts on which this thesis are based were written in two languages: the earliest texts of Buddhism were written in a simplified form of Sanskrit called Pali, and most Indian texts of Madhyamika were written in either classical or “hybrid” Sanskrit. Terms in these two languages are often different but recognizable, e.g. “dhamma” in Pali and “dharma” in Sanskrit. For the sake of coherency, all such terms are given in their Sanskrit form, even when that may entail changing a term when presenting a quote from Pali. Since this thesis is not intended to be a specialized research document for a select audience, terms have been translated whenever possible,even when the subtletiesof the Sanskrit term are lost in translation.In a research paper as limited as this, those subtleties are often almost irrelevant.For example, it is sufficient to translate “dharma” as either “Law” or “elements” without delving into its multiplicity of meanings in Sanskrit. Only four terms have been left consistently untranslated. “Karma” and “nirvana” are now to be found in any English dictionary, and so their translation or italicization is unnecessary. Similarly, “Buddha,” while literally a Sanskrit term meaning “awakened,” is left untranslated and unitalicized due to its titular nature and its familiarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity
    Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture SECOND EDITION Jamshid Gharajedaghi AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA 84 Theobald's Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, E-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Support & Contact” then “Copyright and Permission” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gharajedaghi, Jamshid. Systems thinking : managing chaos and complexity : a platform for designing business architecture / Jamshid Gharajedaghi. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7506-7163-7 (alk. paper) 1. System analysis. 2. Chaotic behavior in systems. 3. Industrial management. 4. Technological complexity. I. Title. T57.6.G52 1999 003—dc21 98-55939 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middles of the Middle Way
    The Middles of the Middle Way In his very first sermon, the Buddha introduced his path of practice as a middle way that avoids two extremes: a commitment to sensual pleasures related to sensual desires, and a commitment to self-affliction. On the surface, this statement makes the path sound like a middling way, at a bland halfway point on the continuum between pleasure and pain. But if you read further in the Canon on the middle way, you realize that its middleness is much more complex than that. To begin with, there are times when the Buddha recommends pursuing pleasant practice; and other times where he recommends painful practice. There are also times where he talks of the middleness of his middle way in different terms entirely. When discussing one of the more advanced stages of the first factor of the path, right view, he describes it as a perspective that avoids questions requiring an either/or response, where both the either and the or entangle you in issues that distract you from the task of putting an end to suffering and stress. This aspect of the path is middle in the sense that it cuts right through the middle of such questions and throws both alternatives off to the side. This means that the Buddha chose his words carefully. The path doesn’t necessarily lie between two extremes. It avoids two extremes. But exactly which directions it goes in avoiding them is up to the discernment of each practitioner to find out. Sometimes you avoid extremes by finding a point of moderation on a continuum running between them: a point that doesn’t always stay right in the middle, and that can move unexpectedly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Departure for Returning to Sabha: a Study of Koan Practice of Silence Jea Sophia Oh West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Philosophy College of Arts & Humanities 12-2017 A departure for returning to sabha: a study of koan practice of silence Jea Sophia Oh West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/phil_facpub Part of the Buddhist Studies Commons Recommended Citation Oh, J. S. (2017). A departure for returning to sabha: a study of koan practice of silence. International Journal of Dharma Studies, 5(12) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40613-017-0059-7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Humanities at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Oh International Journal of Dharma Studies (2017) 5:12 International Journal of DOI 10.1186/s40613-017-0059-7 Dharma Studies RESEARCH Open Access A departure for returning to sabha: a study of koan practice of silence Jea Sophia Oh Correspondence: [email protected] West Chester University of Abstract Pennsylvania, 700 S High St. AND 108D, West Chester, PA 19383, USA This paper deals with koan practice of silence through analyzing the Korean Zen Buddhist film, Why Has Boddhidharma Left for the East? (Bae, Yong-Kyun, Why Has Bodhidharma Left for the East? 1989). This paper follows Kibong's path along with the Buddha's journey of 1) departure, 2) journey in the middle way, and 3) returning with a particular focus on koan practice of silence as the transformative element of enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Mental Model of a Dynamic System? Conceptual Structure and Model Comparison
    What’s in a mental model of a dynamic system? Conceptual structure and model comparison Martin Schaffernicht Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales Universidad de Talca Avenida Lircay s/n 3460000 Talca, CHILE [email protected] Stefan N. Groesser University of St. Gallen Institute of Management System Dynamics Group Dufourstrasse 40a CH - 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland Tel: +41 71 224 23 82 / Fax: +41 71 224 23 55 [email protected] Contribution to the International System Dynamics Conference 2009 Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A. Abstract This paper deals with the representation of mental models of dynamic systems (MMDS). Improving ’mental models’ has always been fundamental in the field of system dynamics. Even though a specific definition exists, no conceptual model of the structure of a MMDS has been offered so far. Previous research about the learning effects of system dynamics interventions have used two methods to represent and analyze mental models. To what extend is the result of these methods comparable? Can they be used to account for a MMDS which is suitable for the system dynamics methodology? Two exemplary MMDSs are compared with both methods. We have found that the procedures and results differ significantly . In addition, neither of the methods can account for the concept of feedback loops. Based on this finding, we propose a conceptual model for the structure of a MMDS, a method to compare them, and a revised definition of MMDS. The paper concludes with a call for more substantive research. Keywords : Mental models, dynamic systems, mental model comparison, graph theory, mental model measurement Introduction Mental models have been a key concept in system dynamics from the beginning of the field (Forrester, 1961).
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness and Its Evolution: from a Human Being to a Post-Human
    Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Taras Handziy Consciousness and Its Evolution: From a Human Being to a Post-Human Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem dr hab. Zbysława Muszyńskiego, prof. nadzw. UMCS Lublin 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Chapter 1: Consciousness, Mind, and Body …………………………………………………… 18 1.1 Conceptions of Consciousness …………………………………………………………. 18 1.1.1 Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ……………………………………….... 18 1.1.1.1 Owen Flanagan’s Analysis of Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ….…….. 20 1.1.2 Paola Zizzi’s Conception of Consciousness ………………………………………….… 21 1.1.3 William James’ Stream of Consciousness ……………………………………………… 22 1.1.4 Ervin Laszlo’s Conception of Consciousness …………………………………………... 22 1.2 Consciousness and Soul ………………………………………...………………………. 24 1.3 Problems in Definition of Consciousness ………………………………………………. 24 1.4 Distinctions between Consciousness and Mind ………………………………………... 25 1.5 Problems in Definition of Mind ………………………………………………………… 26 1.6 Dogmatism in Mind and Mind without Dogmatism ……………………………………. 27 1.6.1 Dogmatism in Mind …………………………………………………………………….. 27 1.6.2 Mind without Dogmatism …………………………………………………………….… 28 1.6.3 Rupert Sheldrake’s Dogmatism in Science …………………………………………….. 29 1.7 Criticism of Scientific Approaches towards Study of Mind ……………….…………… 30 1.8 Conceptions of Mind …………………………………………………………………… 31 1.8.1 Rupert Sheldrake’s Conception of Extended Mind …………………………………….. 31 1.8.2 Colin McGinns’s Knowing and Willing Halves of Mind ……………………………..... 34 1.8.3 Francisco Varela’s, Evan Thompson’s, and Eleanor Rosch’s Embodied Mind ………... 35 1.8.4 Andy Clark’s Extended Mind …………………………………………………………... 35 1.8.5 Role of Mind Understood by Paola Zizzi ………………………………………………. 36 1.9 Mind in Buddhism, Consciousness in Tibetan Buddhism ……………………………… 36 1.9.1 Mind in Buddhism ……………………………………………………………………… 36 1.9.2 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dao Or Tao Quanzhen School of Daoism
    The Dao or Tao The Dao or “The Way” is one of China’s major religions. The main belief is to follow “the way”. It traces its roots back to the sixth century BC. A Chinese philosopher called Laozi wrote a famous book (“Tao te Ching”). After Laozi, came the philosopher Zhuang Zi. He wrote in the Zhuang Zi of “The Butterfly Dream”. In this he describes how he dreamt he was a butterfly but when he work up he asked himself: “Was it the butterfly dreaming he was the Tuan Zhuangzi?” The person who is a believer in “The Way” (the Dao) is called a daoist. The daoist believes that life is generally happy but that it should be lived with balance and virtue (“being good”.) During the Tan Dynasty (618-906 AD), Daoism became the official religion but in later dynasties it was overtaken by Buddhism. During the Cultural Revolution from 1966-1976 many Daoist temples were destroyed. Following the economic reforms in the 1980s, many have been restored and the number of Daoists has grown. There are currently 25,000 Daoist priests and nuns in China. Quanzhen School of Daoism This is a “school of thought”. It consisted of meditation and breathing exercises to help people live longer. Many are also vegetarian. Daoists do not believe in extremes. There is nothing totally good or totally evil. The symbol which shows this clearly is the black and white Ying and Yang. Ying – black: negative, feminine. A symbol of dark, cold, moon, emptiness, weakness. 1 Yang – white: positive, masculine .A symbol of strength and activity, light, warmth, sun, full.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buddhist Followers Observed the Non-Greed Practice in Dhammapada Commentaries
    The Buddhist Followers Observed the Non-Greed Practice in Dhammapada Commentaries 1Venerable Kuvera, 1Phramaha Somphong Khunakaro, 1Sanu Mahatthanadull 1International Buddhist Studies College Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University [email protected] ABSTRACT This research article aimed to study (1) the Buddha’s words on non-greed practice in Theravāda Buddhism, (2) a responsible understanding of the Buddhist followers observed that practice in Dhammapada commentaries, and (3) its benefi ts in Theravāda Buddhism. They were selected according to the scope of the research. The instrument for collecting data based on Theravāda Tipiṭaka Pāḷi Canonical Texts, commentaries, related books, dictionaries, and so on with qualifi ed academics, Analysis data by Descriptive statistics and Content Analysis. The research results were found as follow: 1) Non-greed practice is a good conduct to reduce and remove greed or bad desire. There are four kinds of such practice in Dhammapada commentaries: generosity, absence of sensual objects or sexual objects, absence of covetousness, and tranquility meditation, 2) Non-greed practice was mostly observed by some of the Buddhist followers at the time of the Buddha in their different kinds of conditions and different methods, 3) It can support practitioners in different kinds of its good benefi ts. Observing it, practitioners may attain good benefi ts of their lives in inner peace. This paper intends to show its development of the peaceful world in modern age according to different methods of it. Keywords: Non-greed, generosity, sensual objects, covetousness, tranquility meditation 50 The Journal of The International Buddhist Studies College 1. Introduction Sensual views of greed are tonics of the human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Depth Psychology of the Yogacara
    Aspects of Buddhist Psychology Lecture 42: The Depth Psychology of the Yogacara Reverend Sir, and Friends Our course of lectures week by week is proceeding. We have dealt already with the analytical psychology of the Abhidharma; we have dealt also with the psychology of spiritual development. The first lecture, we may say, was concerned mainly with some of the more important themes and technicalities of early Buddhist psychology. We shall, incidentally, be referring back to some of that material more than once in the course of the coming lectures. The second lecture in the course, on the psychology of spiritual development, was concerned much more directly than the first lecture was with the spiritual life. You may remember that we traced the ascent of humanity up the stages of the spiral from the round of existence, from Samsara, even to Nirvana. Today we come to our third lecture, our third subject, which is the Depth Psychology of the Yogacara. This evening we are concerned to some extent with psychological themes and technicalities, as we were in the first lecture, but we're also concerned, as we were in the second lecture, with the spiritual life itself. We are concerned with the first as subordinate to the second, as we shall see in due course. So we may say, broadly speaking, that this evening's lecture follows a sort of middle way, or middle course, between the type of subject matter we had in the first lecture and the type of subject matter we had in the second. Now a question which immediately arises, and which must have occurred to most of you when the title of the lecture was announced, "What is the Yogacara?" I'm sorry that in the course of the lectures we keep on having to have all these Sanskrit and Pali names and titles and so on, but until they become as it were naturalised in English, there's no other way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Way the Art of Realisation
    The Middle Way The Art of Realisation Jukka Kaisla 2015-2019 v. 5.4 2 Contents Introduction......................................................................................................... 3 It’s all evolutionary, instructs the Buddha ......................................... 6 The Buddha’s discovery .................................................................................. 7 The Four Noble Truths............................................................................ 12 The Middle Way .............................................................................................. 14 The Two Truths of Reality ..................................................................... 16 The middle in the Middle Way ............................................................. 19 Buddhist soteriology and the Middle Way ..................................... 20 Karma .................................................................................................................. 21 Rebirth ................................................................................................................ 27 Neither desirous nor repulsive ................................................................. 36 Homelessness ............................................................................................. 39 Of teachers and disciples ............................................................................. 47 Knowing a better way ............................................................................. 52 The Buddha
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Umpleby Stuart Reconsidering Cybernetics
    UMPLEBY STUART RECONSIDERING CYBERNETICS The field of cybernetics attracted great attention in the 1950s and 1960s with its prediction of a Second Industrial Revolution due to computer technology. In recent years few people in the US have heard of cybernetics (Umpleby, 2015a, see Figures 1 and 2 at the end of Paper). But a wave of recent books suggests that interest in cybernetics is returning (Umpleby and Hughes, 2016, see Figure at the end of Paper). This white paper reviews some basic ideas in cybernetics. I recommend these and other ideas as a resource for better understanding and modeling of social systems, including threat and response dynamics. Some may claim that whatever was useful has already been incorporated in current work generally falling under the complexity label, but that is not the case. Work in cybernetics has continued with notable contributions in recent years. Systems science, complex systems, and cybernetics are three largely independent fields with their own associations, journals and conferences (Umpleby, 2017). Four types of descriptions used in social science After working in social science and systems science for many years I realized that different academic disciplines use different basic elements. Economists use measurable variables such as price, savings, GDP, imports and exports. Psychologists focus on ideas, concepts and attitudes. Sociologists and political scientists focus on groups, organizations, and coalitions. Historians and legal scholars emphasize events and procedures. People trained in different disciplines construct different narratives using these basic elements. One way to reveal more of the variety in a social system is to create at least four descriptions – one each using variables, ideas, groups, and events (See the figures and tables in Medvedeva & Umpleby, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • ESD.00 Introduction to Systems Engineering, Lecture 3 Notes
    Introduction to Engineering Systems, ESD.00 System Dynamics Lecture 3 Dr. Afreen Siddiqi From Last Time: Systems Thinking • “we can’t do just one thing” – things are interconnected and our actions have Decisions numerous effects that we often do not anticipate or realize. Goals • Many times our policies and efforts aimed towards some objective fail to produce the desired outcomes, rather we often make Environment matters worse Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Ref: Figure 1-4, J. Sterman, Business Dynamics: Systems • Systems Thinking involves holistic Thinking and Modeling for a complex world, McGraw Hill, 2000 consideration of our actions Dynamic Complexity • Dynamic (changing over time) • Governed by feedback (actions feedback on themselves) • Nonlinear (effect is rarely proportional to cause, and what happens locally often doesn’t apply in distant regions) • History‐dependent (taking one road often precludes taking others and determines your destination, you can’t unscramble an egg) • Adaptive (the capabilities and decision rules of agents in complex systems change over time) • Counterintuitive (cause and effect are distant in time and space) • Policy resistant (many seemingly obvious solutions to problems fail or actually worsen the situation) • Char acterized by trade‐offs (h(the l ong run is often differ ent f rom the short‐run response, due to time delays. High leverage policies often cause worse‐before‐better behavior while low leverage policies often generate transitory improvement before the problem grows worse. Modes of Behavior Exponential Growth Goal Seeking S-shaped Growth Time Time Time Oscillation Growth with Overshoot Overshoot and Collapse Time Time Time Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Ref: Figure 4-1, J.
    [Show full text]