DOCSLIB.ORG

CPC Outreach Journal #370

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPC Outreach Journal #370 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Maxwell AFB, Alabama Issue No. 370, 10 September 2004 Articles & Other Documents: U.S. Begins Weapon Disposals North Korea Says Seoul's Nuclear Experiments Stoke Arms Race South Africans Release Engineer Held in Nuclear French connection armed Saddam Proliferation Case Libyan Sincerity On Arms In Doubt U.N. Nuclear Agency Asleep At The Switch S. Africa Drops Charges In Nuclear Case S. Korea Admits Extracting Plutonium Threat Of Attack On U.S. Remains Real Nuclear Nightmare Closer To Reality Two Charged In S. African Nuclear Trafficking Case Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal Jo Ann Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953- 7538 or DSN 493-7538. To subscribe, change e-mail address, or unsubscribe to this journal or to request inclusion on the mailing list for CPC publications, please contact Mrs. Eddy. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved Philadelphia Inquirer September 9, 2004 U.S. Begins Weapon Disposals By Andrew Kramer, Associated Press HERMISTON, Ore. - Workers yesterday destroyed the first nerve-gas rocket in a long-delayed $2.4 billion project to dispose of chemical weapons left over from the Cold War. An electrical problem with a trapdoor temporarily delayed disposal of the M-55 rocket in one of the four incinerators built for the Army project at its Umatilla Chemical Depot. An emergency shutoff had been inadvertently pressed, preventing the door from opening, Army spokeswoman Mary Binder said. Technicians overrode the system with a jumper cable to deliver the rocket parts to an incinerator that burns off any traces of the remaining nerve agent. The process began when the rocket was moved to a concrete-reinforced containment room, where it was punched open and drained of about a gallon of sarin, a deadly nerve agent. The depot plans to continue disposals today to test an identical system that will eventually run in tandem to speed up disposal, Binder said. About 3,700 tons of nerve-gas rockets and other chemical weapons have been stockpiled at the depot since 1962. Disposal plans call for each sarin-laden rocket to be chopped into eight pieces before they are fed to the decontaminating furnace. The rocket's destruction came after years of delays in construction and testing at the depot, and after a lawsuit still pending in the Oregon Court of Appeals seeking to block the process. The opposition group GASP, which is seeking the injunction, says burning the weapons risks an accidental release of chemical agents. The Army now has three working chemical-weapons incinerators in the United States. http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/9613662.htm (Return to Articles and Documents List) New York Times September 9, 2004 North Korea Says Seoul's Nuclear Experiments Stoke Arms Race By James Brooke TOKYO, Thursday, Sept. 9 - North Korea warned on Wednesday that a recently disclosed South Korean experiment with uranium enrichment could "accelerate a northeast Asia nuclear arms race," and accused the United States of applying a "double standard" to the nuclear programs of the two Koreas. In North Korea's first public reaction to reports last week of the clandestine experiment four years ago, Han Song Ryol, deputy chief of North Korea's mission to the United Nations, lambasted the United States. But he did not specifically rule out attending a new round of regional talks aimed at ending North Korea's nuclear weapons program. [South Korea acknowledged Thursday that it had conducted plutonium-based nuclear research in the early 1980's, Agence France-Presse reported. A government official cited a recent visit by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency to a South Korean government-run nuclear research center as a reason for revealing the previously undisclosed research.] "We view South Korea's uranium enrichment program in the context of an arms race in northeast Asia," Mr. Han told the Yonhap news agency of South Korea. "It has become difficult to prevent expansion of a nuclear arms race because of South Korea's test." Last week, South Korea admitted publicly that in 2000 government scientists had enriched tiny amounts of uranium in what it called an "academic" exercise. On Wednesday, South Korea said it should have reported the uranium enrichment experiment to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency. "We should have reported that uranium was used during this experiment," a senior South Korean Foreign Ministry official told reporters at a briefing in Seoul. South Korea has said that the uranium was enriched to only 10 percent. Last weekend, I.A.E.A. inspectors took a .10 gram sample to Vienna for testing to determine if the enrichment approached bomb-grade levels, or over 85 percent. South Korea has one of the world's largest nuclear power industries. Nineteen nuclear power plants supply 40 percent of the nation's electricity. It is also seeking to build nuclear power plants in China. Under a 1994 nuclear disarmament accord, South Korea was helping to build North Korea's first two commercially viable nuclear power plants when work was suspended last year as a result of North Korea's violation of the accord. Two years ago, American officials say, North Korea admitted that it was secretly enriching uranium. In January 2003, it expelled I.A.E.A. inspectors and said it started to process stored fuel rods for nuclear weapons material. Since then, it has claimed to have produced "a nuclear deterrent," North Korea's ambiguous phrase for a nuclear weapons arsenal. After the American-led invasion of Iraq last year, Kim Jong Il, North Korea's leader, said the United States would not have attacked Iraq if it had had nuclear weapons. Since then, China and the United States have lead a regional effort to try to persuade North Korea to give up its weapons, most likely in return for economic aid and security guarantees. Although China has set a Sept. 22 date for the start of the fourth round of talks, North Korea has not committed to attending. In New York, Ambassador Han called Washington "worthless" as a negotiations partner and said that American policy toward North Korea made it "no longer worth meeting." But these are phrases that have been used in the periods before talks. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/09/international/asia/09korea.html?pagewanted=all (Return to Articles and Documents List) New York Times South Africans Release Engineer Held in Nuclear Proliferation Case By MICHAEL WINES Published: September 9, 2004 OHANNESBURG, Sept. 8 - Five days after the police arrested a 53-year-old engineer on nuclear proliferation charges and carted 11 crates of suspected uranium enrichment gear from his office, prosecutors dropped all charges against the man on Wednesday and released him from jail without explanation. Officials said later that the case would undergo further investigation. But they left unclear whether the engineer, Johan Andries Muller Meyer, faced the possibility of being arrested again. Mr. Meyer's lawyer, Heinrich Badenhorst, also declined comment but said that a statement on the case could be issued Friday. Mr. Meyer, who runs an engineering company in Vanderbiljpark, an industrial town about 50 miles south of Johannesburg, had been jailed last Friday on three charges of violating South African laws against possessing, importing and exporting nuclear weapons machinery or components. Officials had accused Mr. Meyer of being part of a global nuclear materials smuggling ring masterminded by Abdul Qadeer Khan, Pakistan's top nuclear scientist. They said that Mr. Meyer's company, Trade Fin Engineering, was suspected of manufacturing components for Libya's clandestine nuclear weapons program in 2000 and 2001. Court documents listed a range of equipment that had been seized from Mr. Meyer's offices and turned over to an investigative team from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is based in Vienna. The equipment included parts of gas centrifuges, which are used to purify uranium gas, and a Spanish-made precision lathe that could be used to make centrifuge parts. Libya voluntarily shut down its weapons program in December and has turned over equipment and related documents to the international authorities. Last week, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bombing Iran Or Living with Iran's Bomb?
    Bombing Iran or Living with Iran’s Bomb? Kassem Ja’afar © Transatlantic Institute and Kassem Ja’afar, July 2008 Bombing Iran or Living With Iran’s Bomb? The Price of Military Action and the Consequences of Inaction Kassem Ja’afar FOREWORD Dear Reader, Since its nuclear programme was exposed in 2002, Iran has defied the international community and doggedly pursued its nuclear goals, turning down tantalizing diplomatic incentives, bearing the brunt of increasing diplomatic isolation and incurring a steep price in economic sanctions. Over the past six years, Iran has ramped up its nuclear programme and fought all attempts to make its rulers desist from its quest. As of July 2008, nothing seems to stand in the way of Iran’s successfully completing a nuclear cycle – nothing, except time and technological hurdles its scientists will eventually overcome. What options does the international community have? The answer depends on whether Iran can be convinced to change course. If so, the right mixtures of pressures and incentives will, at some point, tip the balance and persuade Iranian decision makers to change course. Regardless, the international community has failed so far to find that perfect point of equilibrium. Iran’s nuclear programme, meanwhile, is proceeding apace and time is running out. Before long, the international community might be faced with the unthinkable – the terrible dilemma between launching an attack against Iran before it acquires nuclear weapons (or at least the capability to build them) and coming to terms and living with Iran’s nuclear bomb. These are two terrible scenarios – but they may soon become very real.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Liberation Army in the Land of Elusive Sheen
    No. 38 SEPTEMBER 2001 The People’s Liberation Army in the Land of Elusive Sheen Edward B. Atkeson The People’s Liberation Army in the Land of Elusive Sheen by Edward B. Atkeson The Land Warfare Papers No. 38 September 2001 A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 38, SEPTEMBER 2001 The People’s Liberation Army in the Land of Elusive Sheen by Edward B. Atkeson Major General Edward B. Atkeson, USA Ret., is a senior fellow with AUSA’s Institute of Land Warfare and a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. During his military service he was appointed Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, U.S. Army Europe, and was later a member of the National Intelligence Council under the Director of Central Intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan Discusses Nuclear Program in TV Talk Show
    Pakistan: Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan Discusses Nuclear Program in TV Talk Show SAP20090902008002 Karachi Aaj News Television in Urdu 1400 GMT 31 Aug 09 [From the "Islamabad Tonight" discussion program hosted by Nadeem Malik. Words within double slant lines as received in English.] [Host Nadeem Malik] Pakistan owes its impregnable defense to a scientist called Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, who is our guest today. [Malik] What difficulties were you facing when you started the nuclear program of Pakistan? [Khan] //Industrial infrastructure// was nonexistent at that time in Pakistan. Immediately after the Indian nuclear tests in 1974, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto summoned a meeting of scientists in Multan to ask them to make a nuclear bomb. After the debacle of East Pakistan in 1971, Bhutto was extremely worried about Pakistan's security, as he knew that Pakistan had become very //vulnerable//. He removed Usmani when the latter told him that they could not go ahead with their plan of acquiring a nuclear bomb, because the basic //infrastructure// was not there. Usman was not wrong in his capacity. The Atomic Energy Commission was the only relevant institution at that time, but it lacked the required expertise. India's nuclear test in 1974 caused hysteria in Pakistan. I was in Belgium in 1971, when the Pakistan Army surrendered in the then East Pakistan and faced utmost humiliation. Hindus and Sikhs were beating them with shoes, and their heads were being shaved in the //concentration camps//. I saw those scenes with horror. When India tested its bomb in 1974, I was living in Holland and working in a //nuclear field//.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Background and Analysis
    Order Code 96-767 F CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Chinese Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Background and Analysis September 13, 1996 (name redacted) Analyst in Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Chinese Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Background and Analysis Summary To assist congressional deliberations, this report sets forth the background on and analysis of Chinese technology transfers suspected of contributing to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. For a discussion of policy options and approaches, see the related Issue Brief 92056, Chinese Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Current Policy Issues. The issue of Chinese proliferation involves three aspects: China’s support for nonproliferation efforts, China’s transfers that promote proliferation, and vertical proliferation (modernization of China’s WMD and missile programs). Since 1992, China has responded to U.S. and other pressures to participate in some parts of international nonproliferation regimes. China promised to abide by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), which is not a treaty, but a set of guidelines. China also acceded to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and signed the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). However, it is not a member of the MTCR, Zangger Committee, Nuclear Suppliers Group, Australia Group, or the Wassenaar Arrangement. The pressures to join nonproliferation efforts that China faced in the early 1990s have weakened, while its commitment to nonproliferation is unclear. Chinese missile-related transfers have not violated any international treaties, since the MTCR is not a treaty, but have violated Chinese pledges and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of the Deal for North Korea: the Unexplored Parallel Between Bush and Trump Foreign Policy*
    International Journal of Korean Unification Studies Vol. 26, No. 1, 2017, 53–86. The Art of the Deal for North Korea: The Unexplored Parallel between Bush and Trump Foreign Policy* Soohoon Lee ‘Make America Great Again,’ has been revived while ‘America First’ and ‘peace through strength,’ have been revitalized by the Trump admin­­­ istration. Americans and the rest of the world were shocked by the dramatic transformation in U.S. foreign policy. In the midst of striking changes, this research analyzes the first hundred days of the Trump administration’s foreign policy and aims to forecast its prospects for North Korea. In doing so, the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy creeds, ‘American exceptionalism’ and ‘peace through strength,’ are revisited and compared with that of Trump’s. Beyond the similarities and differences found between the two administrations, the major finding of the analysis is that Trump’s profit­oriented nature, through which he operated the Trump Organization for nearly a half century, has indeed influenced the interest- oriented nature in his operating of U.S. foreign policy. The prospects for Trump’s policies on North Korea will be examined through a business­ sensitive lens. Keywords: Donald Trump, U.S Foreign Policy, North Korea, America First, Peace through Strength Introduction “We are so proud of our military. It was another successful event… If you look at what’s happened over the eight weeks and compare that to what’s happened over the last eight years, you'll see there’s a tremen­ * This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF­2016S1A3A2924968).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. ( U //FOUO Health: Detainee Is in Good Health
    SECRET 20320726 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS , JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO U.S. NAVAL STATION , GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA APOAE09360 JTF- GTMO- CDR 26 July 2007 MEMORANDUMFORCommander, UnitedStates SouthernCommand, 3511NW 91st Avenue, Miami, FL 33172 SUBJECT : Recommendation for Continued Detention Under Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN - 000231DP (S) JTF-GTMODetaineeAssessment 1. ( S ) PersonalInformation: JDIMS/NDRCReferenceName: Abdulhadi Abdallah Ibrahimal- Sharakh Aliases and Current/ True Name: Abd al-Hadi Abdallah Ibrahim al-Sharikh, Abu Akrama al-Sharki, Abu Akrama al-Najdi, Akrima, Ubaydah al-Sharqi, Abu Ubaydah, Abdelal-Sharikh Place ofBirth Riyadh, SaudiArabia (SA ) Date ofBirth: 2 July 1982 Citizenship: SaudiArabia Internment Serial Number ( ISN) -000231DP 2. ( U // FOUO Health: Detainee is in good health. 3. ( U ) JTF -GTMO Assessment : a. (S) Recommendation: JTF- GTMO recommendsthis detaineefor ContinuedDetention Under DoDControl (CD . JTF-GTMO previously assessed detainee as ContinuedDetention Under Control (CD) on 28 July 2006. b ( S //NF) Executive Summary: Detainee is assessed to be an al-Qaida member with numerous al-Qaida associates, including senior al- Qaida operatives and members of his immediate family. Detainee and his brother were selected and prepared by top al-Qaida leaders for a special mission to attack US forces at Prince Sultan Air Base (PSAB) in Saudi CLASSIFIED BY MULTIPLE SOURCES REASON : 12958 , AS AMENDED , SECTION 1.4( C) DECLASSIFY ON: 20320726 SECRET 20320726 SECRETI/ NOFORN 20320726 JTF-GTMO-CDR SUBJECT: Recommendationfor ContinuedDetentionUnder Control( CD) for GuantanamoDetainee, ISN - 000231DP (S Arabia ( SA) using SA- 7 surface-to - air missiles (SAM). Detainee participated inhostilities against US and Coalition forces at Bagram and Tora Bora in Afghanistan (AF) .
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and Iran | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1476 Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and Iran by Mehdi Khalaji Feb 12, 2009 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mehdi Khalaji Mehdi Khalaji, a Qom-trained Shiite theologian, is the Libitzky Family Fellow at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis uring a February trip to Iran, Hamas leader Khaled Mashal praised Iranian leaders for their support during D the conflict in the Gaza Strip, a further indication of the strengthening ties between the Sunni Islamist group, which the United States has designated as a terrorist organization, and the Shiite regime in Tehran. Mashal's statements come on the heels of the U.S. Treasury Department's terrorist designations of al-Qaeda leaders and operatives sheltered in Iran. These latest examples of Sunni-Shiite cooperation raise new questions about whether Iran can improve its relationship with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. While such a rapprochement appears unlikely, history suggests it is far from impossible. Iran has maintained informal ties to the Muslim Brotherhood for many years, and Shiite Islam probably has more appeal among Egyptian Sunnis than it does among Sunnis in other Arab countries. Iran's sharp criticism of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak is also likely to resonate with Egyptian radicals under the thumb of the regime in Cairo. If Iran were to develop close relations with the Brotherhood, Iranian influence would grow considerably in the Arab world, giving Tehran a significant say among Arab radicals and, undoubtedly, producing dangerous developments for U.S. interests in the region. Ties between Iran and Sunni Extremists Egypt has long been suspicious of the connection between the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and Iran, based in large part on Iran's longstanding strong ties to Hamas -- an offshoot of the Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Al-Qaeda Revival in Pakistan: Challenges and Prospects
    Essay _ 94 The Al-Qaeda Revival in NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability Pakistan: Challenges and 2020, Vol. III (1) Pages 94-101 Prospects njips.nust.edu.pk Farhan Zahid1 Pakistan remains a country of vital importance for Al-Qaeda. It is primarily because of Al-Qaeda’s advent, rise and shelter and not to mention the support the terrorist organization found at the landscape of Pakistan during the last two decades. The emergence of in Pakistan can be traced back to the Afghan War (1979-89), with a brief sabbatical in Sudan the Islamist terrorist group rose to gain prominence after shifting back to Afghanistan. It then became a global ‘Islamist’ terrorist entity while based in neighboring Afghanistan and found safe havens in the erstwhile tribal areas of Pakistan in the aftermath of the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Prior to its formation in 1988 in Peshawar (Pakistan), it had worked as Maktab al-Khidmat (Services Bureau) during the Afghan War.2 It had its roots in Pakistan, which had become a transit point of extremists en route to Afghanistan during the War. All high profile Al-Qaeda leaders, later becoming high-value targets, and members of its central Shura had lived in Pakistan at one point in their lives. That is the very reason the Al-Qaeda in Pakistan is termed as Al-Qaeda Core or Central among law enforcement practitioners and intelligence communities. Without going into details of Al-Qaeda’s past in Pakistan the aim of this article is to focus on its current state of affairs and what future lies ahead of it in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense
    The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense: Why Republicans Resurrected Reagan’s Dream Paul Musgrave Introduction National missile defense, even in its stripped-down, post-Reagan version, died in 1993. The Clinton administration killed it; shifting funding from research on “Star Wars”-like projects to missile defense systems like the Patriot. Instead of building a shield that would protect all of America, the United States would henceforth try to construct only limited defenses that could protect troops deployed in a future battleground. Yet ten years later, the George W. Bush administration has broken ground on new testing sites for a planned national missile defense, and billions of dollars annually are flowing into research and construction of a nationwide missile shield. The Bush administration could claim, were it so inclined, that it was merely following its predecessors; the basic parts of the Bush system are the same as those President Clinton proposed to use in his national missile defense. Why did U.S. policy toward missile defenses shift so dramatically? How did National Missile Defense survive its apparent death in 1993? These questions are important. National missile defense, in all of its guises and architectures, is among the most complex technical challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. It is also among the most costly, with some estimates placing the total cost of a missile defense system at nearly a trillion dollars. Understanding the sources of NMD’s resurrection is critical to a deeper comprehension of American security policy in the early years of the twenty-first century. The rebirth of missile defense came from two sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Economic Battle Plan
    Bill Gertz - Deceiving the Sky 2.60 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 75) Background Briefing: Bill Gertz joins the Economic War Room to discuss our intelligence failures with China through 20 years of in-depth investigative reporting. Topics covered include China’s real world view, the mistakes we made integrating our economy with China, and the solutions going forward. It is time for all of America to wake up to the reality of what is happening. Historically, our intelligence analysts have been aligned with the Chinese. Now, that may be changing! ”In the 1990’s, I was with the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. And what he was saying was that China was not a threat. And my response was, “Why do you think that?” And his answer, to paraphrase it, was “Because the Chinese told us.” And I was totally shocked. But it became very clear to me within a very few years when a major spy was uncovered inside the Defense Intelligence Agency. His name was Ron Montaperto. He was a Defense Intelligence Agency analyst. And he was eventually convicted of passing classified information to Chinese and military intelligence at the Chinese embassy in Washington.” – Bill Gertz Best Selling Author, National Security Insider and Investigative Reporter Our intelligence community, our policy community, and our academic community has all been kind of infiltrated with these pro-China analysts. In some cases they were even infiltrated with Chinese spies. Your Mission: To understand the China threat and help enforce political change in DC that protects America’s national security. page 1 Bill Gertz - Deceiving the Sky 2.60 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 75) FUN FACT: Former Defense secretary Rumsfeld said that Bill Gertz got information in the Pentagon faster than he did as Defense Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Parcel Bombs Point to Al-Qaeda Switch
    œ AA-AA ! " #$% & ' ! '! ' #$% ! ' ( ' ( '&% www.afgazad.com [email protected] European Languages )*+ ,% Asia times online Parcel bombs point to al-Qaeda switch By Syed Saleem Shahzad 11/3/2020 ISLAMABAD - The foiled al-Qaeda plot to blow up two cargo planes indicates that the group's international operations, now under the stewardship of Egyptian Saiful Adil (Saif al-Adel), will focus on relatively low-intensity terror attacks around the world rather than on big missions such as the September 11, 2001, assault on New York and Washington. Two United States-bound bombs sent in air cargo from Yemen were intercepted in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates and in Britain. The devices were discovered on Friday hidden in printers. Such an idea bears the hallmark of Adil, who was earlier this year released from Iranian custody after disappearing following the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan in late 2001. Asia Times Online reportedly exclusively how al-Qaeda's militarychief was freed with about 15 other al-Qaeda members in a deal that saw Heshmatollah Attarzadeh, the commercial attache at the Iranian consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan, released by militants. (See How Iran and al-Qaeda made a deal Asia Times Online, April 30, 2010.) Those freed included Saad bin Laden (one of Osama bin Laden's sons), Suleman al-Gaith and Abu Hafs al-Mauritani. Asia Times Online also recently broke news of Adil and other top al-Qaeda members living in Pakistan's North Waziristan tribal area on the border with Afghanistan. (See Taliban peace talks come to a halt October 30, 2010.) "Saiful Adil is likely to be the new face of al-Qaeda in 2011, with operations emanating in Pakistan and spreading to Somalia, Yemen and Turkey to pitch operations in Europe and India," the article www.afgazad.com 1 [email protected] reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, As Amended
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/17/2013 12:53:25 PM OMB NO. 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 «JJ.S. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending 06/30/2013 (Insert date) I - REGISTRANT 1. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. Pakistan Tehreek e Insaf 5975 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 315 Maple street Richardson TX, 75081 Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence address(es) Yes Q No D (2) Citizenship Yes Q No Q (3) Occupation Yes • No D (b) If an organization: (1) Name Yes Q No H (2) Ownership or control Yes • No |x] - (3) Branch offices Yes D No 0 (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes D No H If yes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes • No D If no, please attach the required amendment. I The Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy of the charter, articles of incorporation, association, and by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver of the requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]