DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Setting and Impacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHAPTER IV Environmental Setting and Impacts This chapter describes the environmental setting and analyzes the potential impacts associated with the removal of Sunol and Niles Dams. As described in Chapter II, this chapter provides the detailed analysis of environmental issues. The environmental setting presents both regional context and site-specific details of the existing conditions to provide a basis for identifying potential impacts due to project implementation. This chapter also includes, for each environmental issue, a description of significance criteria used in analyzing potential impacts. Based on these criteria, impacts determined to be significant or potentially significant would require mitigation measures. The impact analysis indicates whether or not mitigation measures are available to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level; the reader is referred to Chapter V for a detailed description of mitigation measures. In some cases where impacts are determined to be less than significant, the impact analysis recommends improvement measures that could reduce adverse effects or temporary disruption; however, these measures are not required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A. Compatibility with Local Plans and Policies The City and County of San Francisco, as a chartered city and county, and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), as a public utility, receive intergovernmental immunity under California Government Code Sections 53090 et seq. Such immunity exempts the extraterritorial lands owned by the City and County of San Francisco, through the SFPUC, from the planning and building laws of any other city or county in which those lands are located. Thus, the zoning and building codes, general plans, specific plans, and other planning and building policies of Alameda County, or various regional plans, do not apply to this project. The SFPUC has authority over the management, use, and control of its extraterritorial lands under the San Francisco City Charter, Section 4.112 (San Francisco City Charter, 2004). San Francisco’s planning and building laws, to the extent that they apply to San Francisco’s extraterritorial lands, could be applicable to the proposed project, as long as they do not conflict with the SFPUC’s charter responsibilities. Similarly, the San Francisco General Plan (City of San Francisco, 1996) applies primarily to lands within the City and County of San Francisco, and there are no specific policies directed to areas outside of these boundaries, although general environmental resource policies in the San Francisco General Plan could be applicable to the project site. The San Francisco General Plan, which provides general policies and objectives to guide land use decisions, contains some policies that relate to physical environmental issues. The compatibility of the project with policies that do not relate to physical environmental issues will Case No. 2001.1149E IV.A-1 ESA / 201591 Sunol/Niles Dam Removal Project October 2005 Environmental Setting and Impacts Compatibility with Local Plans and Policies be considered by decision makers as part of their decision to approve or disapprove the proposed project; any potential conflicts identified as part of that process would not alter the physical environmental effects of the proposed project. The SFPUC seeks to manage its lands in a way that is consistent with San Francisco’s planning and building laws and works cooperatively with local jurisdictions to avoid conflicts with local planning and building laws. Nevertheless, the laws of other jurisdictions are nonbinding on the SFPUC’s management of its lands. The referenced excerpts from the general plans of Alameda County and various regional plans are presented in this report for informational purposes only. Setting Project Area The proposed project area lies along State Route 84 (SR 84) in Alameda County, east of Fremont, between the communities of Niles and Sunol (see Figures 1 and 2). SR 84 parallels Alameda Creek and intersects SR 238 to the west of the project area and Interstate 680 (I-680) to the east. Sunol and Niles Dams are located on Alameda Creek in the Alameda Creek watershed. The Alameda Creek watershed contributes to the SFPUC water supply. The dams were built as part of the SFPUC water supply system. Due to system upgrades, they no longer aid in the provision of water to downstream portions of the system. Niles Dam Niles Dam is located approximately two miles east of Niles District, a section of the city of Fremont. The Niles Dam project site is located at the eastern edge of Fremont and is surrounded by low-density development (City of Fremont, 2004). The Niles Dam site has three land use designations under the Fremont General Plan: Hill Face Open Space (Development Reserve Boundary), Hill Open Space (Development Reserve Boundary), and Hill Open Space (City of Fremont, 2004). The Niles Canyon Railroad (NCRR, right-of-way formerly owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad) runs along the south bank of Alameda Creek about 150 feet southeast of the dam. The right-of-way is owned by Alameda County (City of Fremont, 2001). The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR, formerly owned by the Western Pacific Railroad) right-of-way runs adjacent to the south bank of Alameda Creek about 2,000 feet south of the dam. The northern bank of Alameda Creek rises steeply and has limited vegetation. Vargas Plateau Regional Park, which is designated as Parklands in the Fremont General Plan, lies just south of the site across the UPRR right-of-way. Sunol Dam Sunol Dam is located in unincorporated Alameda County adjacent to the community of Sunol along SR 84 east of Niles Dam. Its land use designation in the Alameda County East County Area Plan is Agriculture (Alameda County, 2002). The UPRR and the NCRR, which generally run parallel to Alameda Creek in Niles Canyon, lie about 100 and 300 feet to the north, respectively, Case No. 2001.1149E IV.A-2 ESA / 201591 Sunol/Niles Dam Removal Project October 2005 Environmental Setting and Impacts Compatibility with Local Plans and Policies on either side of SR 84. The northern bank of Alameda Creek adjacent to Sunol Dam is characterized by dense riparian vegetation. A commercial (garden) nursery occupies the low- lying, flat area along the north side of the dam and its upstream reservoir. According to the East County Area Plan (Alameda County, 2002), the primary land use designations in the vicinity of Sunol Dam are Agriculture, Water Management, and Resource Management. Plans and Policies The SFPUC is in the process of preparing a habitat conservation plan for the Alameda Creek watershed. Currently, there are no habitat conservation or natural community plans for the project area. Plans and policies adopted for the project area are summarized below and are presented for informational purposes only. Alameda County General Plan East County Area Plan The East County Area Plan (ECAP), one of the three area plans that make up the Alameda County General Plan, addresses unincorporated areas of Alameda County. The other two area plans are the Castro Valley Area Plan and the Eden Area Plan. The ECAP, adopted in May 1994 (last amended 2002), includes the cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, and small portions of Hayward. The Alameda County General Plan also includes five countywide functional elements: the Regional Element, Housing Element, Energy Element, Natural Resources and Open Space Element, and the Safety and Noise Element. The Sunol Dam site is located in the unincorporated portion of Alameda County in the planning area addressed by the ECAP. General Open Space Policy 52: The County shall preserve open space areas for the protection of public health and safety, provision of recreational opportunities, production of natural resources (e.g., agriculture, windpower, and mineral extraction), protection of sensitive viewsheds, preservation of biological resources, and the physical separation between neighboring communities. Sensitive Viewsheds Policy 116: The alternation of natural topography, vegetation, and other characteristics by grading, excavating, filling or other development activity shall be minimized. To the extent feasible, access roads shall be consolidated and located where they are least visible from public view points. Policy 117: The County shall require that where grading is necessary, the offsite visibility of cut and fill slopes and drainage improvements is minimized. Graded slopes shall be designed to simulate natural contours and support vegetation to blend with surrounding undisturbed slopes. Policy 118: The County shall require that grading avoid areas containing large stands of mature, healthy vegetation, scenic natural formations, or natural watercourses. Case No. 2001.1149E IV.A-3 ESA / 201591 Sunol/Niles Dam Removal Project October 2005 Environmental Setting and Impacts Compatibility with Local Plans and Policies Policy 119: The County shall require that access roads be sited and designed to minimize grading. Biological Resources The goal of the ECAP as it pertains to biological resources is, “To preserve a variety of plant communities and wildlife habitat.” Objective 1. Tree Preservation Policy 110: Alameda County requires that developments are sited to avoid or, if avoidance is infeasible, to minimize disturbance of large stands of mature, healthy trees and individual trees of notable size and age. Where healthy trees are removed, the County requires a tree replacement program which includes a range of tree
Recommended publications
  • The Fault Line Threatening Dams

    The Fault Line Threatening Dams

    The Fault Line Threatening Dams The Fault Line Threatening Dams Deficient structures, earthquake risks raise possibility of potentially catastrophic flooding By Jim Carlton June 24, 2017 FREMONT, Calif.-The coastal mountains that frame this working-class city next to San Francisco Bay harbor a hidden menace: a reservoir 10 miles away that sits next to an active earthquake fault, which experts say could cause a dam break and flood thousands of homes. The potential threat is so severe, the owner of the Calaveras Reservoir decided to build a replacement dam. But seven years after that work began, the dam is unfinished and isn't expected to be complete until 2019 -- four years behind schedule. The issues hampering the Calaveras Reservoir project show how difficult it can be to repair or replace an old dam, which is of growing concern nationally. An estimated 27,380 dams, or 30% of the 90,580 listed in the latest 2016 National Inventory of Dams, are rated as posing a high or significant hazard. Of those, more than 2,170 are considered deficient and in need of upgrading, according to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers. The inventory by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers doesn't break out which ones are deficient. But funding and inspection staffing are considered inadequate, the civil engineers' report said. An estimated $64 billion is needed to upgrade those dams, including $22 billion for those posing the highest hazard, according to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, a nonprofit group in Lexington, Ky. "It's a huge problem with limited resources," said Ivan Wong, a consulting seismologist from Walnut Creek, Calif., who works on dam projects nationally.
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
  • ACA Newsletter 21

    ACA Newsletter 21

    UP YOUR CREEK ! ALAMEDA CREEK ALLIANCE NEWSLETTER Issue 21 Winter 2005/2006 CALAVERAS DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT ALAMEDA CREEK ALLIANCE Protecting and restoring the natural ecosystems of the Alameda Creek watershed P. O. Box 192 Canyon, CA 94516 (510) 499-9185 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.alamedacreek.org STEELHEAD RETURN FOR NINTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR Steelhead trout seen in lower Alameda Creek on December 29th and 30th were likely blown out by the historic New Year storm, which brought Alameda Creek flow up to 10,000 cubic feet/second in lower Planning for the replacement of Calaveras Dam Niles Canyon and 18,000 cfs in the flood control lurches forward, with the San Francisco Public channel in Union City!!!! Steelhead were again seen at Utilities Commission (SFPUC) hoping to remove the the weir on March 3rd. On March 4th ACA volunteers seismically inadequate dam and have the rebuilt dam and the East Bay Parks biologist, with cooperation completed and operational by 2011. The ACA, from the Alameda County Water District and Alameda concerned that fish restoration elements are being County Flood Control District, helped rescue two adult left out of the project while engineering plans move males from below the BART weir and move them rapidly forward, asked the SFPUC in December to upstream into Niles Canyon. One of the fish, given the revise the project to include steelhead and stream name “Brutus”, was the largest steelhead documented restoration elements. Although the SFPUC declined yet in the creek, weighing 11 pounds and measuring to change the project description before approving 31 inches.
  • Senior Resource Guide for Central County

    Senior Resource Guide for Central County

    Senior Resource Guide for Central County Nonprofit and Public Agencies Serving Castro Valley ● Hayward ● San Leandro ● San Lorenzo Alameda County Area Agency on Aging 6955 Foothill Boulevard, 3 rd Floor, Oakland CA 94605, 1-800-510-2020 / 510-577-3530 http://alamedasocialservices.org (Revised 10/2010) ADULT DAY CARE/RESPITE (useful web site: www.adsnac.org ) Adult Day Services Network of Alameda County (personalized referrals & community education) ... 510-883-0874 Alzheimer’s Services of the East Bay Adult Day Health Care, Hayward.............................. 510-888-1411 Bay Area Community Services Adult Day Care (serves Hayward) , Fremont............................ 510-656-7742 Center for Elders Independence (PACE—A Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly) . 510-433-1150 LifeLong Medical Care Adult Day Health Care, East Oakland............................................. 510-563-4390 St. Peter’s Community Adult Day Care, San Leandro ......................................................... 510-562-4037 ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION PROGRAMS Alameda County Health Care ACCESS (referrals to substance abuse services in Alameda County) .. 1-800-491-9099 Alcoholics Anonymous Central Office, Oakland .................................................................. 510-839-8900 CommPre, a program of Horizon Services, Inc. (Prevention strategies to reduce alcohol and medication misuse among older adults) .......................... 510-885-8743 ALZHEIMER’S SERVICES Alzheimer’s Association Helpline .......................................................................................
  • Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency Board Policy Committee Meeting

    Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency Board Policy Committee Meeting

    May 16, 2019 – Agenda Item #9G BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY AND CONSERVATION AGENCY BOARD POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING May 10, 2019 Correspondence and media coverage of interest between April 15 and May 9, 2019 Correspondence Date: May 3, 2019 From: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Subject: Press Release: SFPUC Celebrates Completion of Calaveras Dam Replacement Project Date: April 29, 2019 From: Office of Governor Gavin Newsom Subject Press Advisory: Governor Newsom Directs State Agencies to Prepare Water Resilience Portfolio for California Media Coverage Water Supply: Date: May 6, 2019 Source: Sacramento Bee Article: To prevent water shortages, California must embrace desalination Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Sierra snowpack is 188 percent of normal Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Maven’s Notebook Article: Final Phillips Survey of 2019 Finds Healthy Late-Spring Snowpack Water Infrastructure: Date: May 5, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Editorial: Governor sets welcome new course on Delta water issues Date: May 4, 2019 Source: Grist Article: The town that extended ‘smart growth’ to its water Date: May 2, 2019 Source: SF Gate Article: California governor makes big change to giant water project Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Newsom officially kills Jerry Brown’s Delta Twin Tunnels project Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Maven’s Notebook Article: State Withdraws WaterFix Approvals, Initiates Planning and Permitting for a Smaller Single Tunnel May 16, 2019 – Agenda Item #9G Water Infrastructure, cont’d.: Date: May
  • Figure 6-3. California's Water Infrastructure Network

    Figure 6-3. California's Water Infrastructure Network

    DA 17 DA 67 DA 68 DA 22 DA 29 DA 39 DA 40 DA 41 DA 46 N. FORK N. & M. TUOLOMNE YUBA RIVER FORKS CHERRY CREEK, RIVER Figure 6-3. California's Water Infrastructure ELEANOR CREEK AMERICAN M & S FORK RIVER YUBA RIVER New Bullards Hetch Hetchy Res Bar Reservoir GREENHORN O'Shaughnessy Dam Network Configuration for CALVIN (1 of 2) SR- S. FORK NBB CREEK & BEAR DA 32 SR- D17 AMERICAN RIVER HHR DA 42 DA 43 DA 44 RIVER STANISLAUS SR- LL- C27 RIVER & 45 Camp Far West Reservoir DRAFT Folsom Englebright C31 Lake DA 25 DA 27 Canyon Tunnel FEATHER Lake 7 SR- CALAVERAS New RIVER SR-EL CFW SR-8 RIVER Melones Lower Cherry Creek MERCED MOKELUMNE Reservoir SR-10 Aqueduct ACCRETION CAMP C44 RIVER FAR WEST TO DEER CREEK C28 FRENCH DRY RIVER CREEK WHEATLAND GAGE FRESNO New Hogan Lake Oroville DA 70 D67 SAN COSUMNES Lake RIVER SR- 0 SR-6 C308 SR- JOAQUIN Accretion: NHL C29 RIVER 81 CHOWCHILLA American River RIVER New Don Lake McClure Folsom to Fair D9 DRY Pardee Pedro SR- New Exchequer RIVER Oaks Reservoir 20 CREEK Reservoir Dam SR- Hensley Lake DA 14 Tulloch Reservoir SR- C33 Lake Natoma PR Hidden Dam Nimbus Dam TR Millerton Lake SR-52 Friant Dam C23 KELLY RIDGE Accretion: Eastside Eastman Lake Bypass Accretion: Accretion: Buchanan Dam C24 Yuba Urban DA 59 Camanche Melones to D16 Upper Merced D64 SR- C37 Reservoir C40 2 SR-18 Goodwin River 53 D62 SR- La Grange Dam 2 CR Goodwin Reservoir D66 Folsom South Canal Mokelumne River Aqueduct Accretion: 2 D64 depletion: Upper C17 D65 Losses D85 C39 Goodwin to 3 Merced River 3 3a D63 DEPLETION mouth C31 2 C25 C31 D37
  • Senior Resource Guide for East County

    Senior Resource Guide for East County

    Senior Resource Guide for East County Nonprofit and Public Agencies Serving Dublin ● Livermore ● Pleasanton ● Sunol Alameda County Area Agency on Aging 6955 Foothill Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Oakland CA 94605, 1-800-510-2020 / 510-577-3530 http://alamedasocialservices.org (Revised 10/2012) ADULT DAY CARE/RESPITE (useful web site: www.adsnac.org ) Adult Day Services Network of Alameda County (personalized referrals & community education) 510-883-0874 Alzheimer’s Services of the East Bay Adult Day Health Care, Hayward.............................. 510-888-1411 ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION PROGRAMS Alameda County Health Care ACCESS (referrals to substance abuse services in Alameda County) .. 1-800-491-9099 Alcoholics Anonymous Central Office, Oakland .................................................................. 510-839-8900 Senior Support Program of the Tri-Valley............................................................................ 925-931-5379 ALZHEIMER’S SERVICES Alzheimer’s Association Helpline ........................................................................................ 1-800-272-3900 Alzheimer’s Support Group ................................................................................................. 925-931-5379 Ethnic Elders Care (website focuses on ethnic elders with Alzheimer's and related disorders) www.ethnicelderscare.net Family Caregiver Alliance (limited respite may be available for unpaid caregivers)..................... 1-800-445-8106 Senior Support Program of the Tri-Valley...........................................................................
  • Library (Alameda County) 247244.Pdf

    Library (Alameda County) 247244.Pdf

    ,. ,. 9/28/l/} tt: 22. ' Fl L€- i:t- 2q %4 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STANDARD SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement, dated as of 1st April, 201 7 is by and between the County of Alameda, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and City of Union City, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor". WITNESS ETH Whereas, County desires to obtain janitorial services which are more fully described in Exhibit A hereto; and 0 Whereas, Contractor is professionally qualified to provide such services and is willing to provide same to County; and Now, therefore it is agreed that County does hereby retain Contractor to provide Janitorial Services, and Contractor accepts such engagement, on the General Terms and Conditions hereinafter specified in this Agreement, the Additional Provisions attached hereto, and the following described exhibits, all of which are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference: Exhibit A Definition of Services Exhibit B Payment Terms Exhibit C Insurance Requirements Exhibit D Debarment and Suspension Certification Exhibit E Contract Compliance Reporting Requirements The term of this Agreement shall be from April 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018 The compensation payable to Contractor hereunder shall not exceed (Fifty Thousand dollars) ($ 50,000) for the term of this Agreement. l f ~ · I o IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA CITY OF UNION CITY ' By: _____________ By: _~--~, ~-­ Signature Signature WILMA CHAN Name: ------------ Name: Antonio Acosta (Printed) (Printed) Title: President of the Board of Supervisors Title: City Manager Date: 21 fcbn.4., 7AJ 11 Approved as to Form: By signing above, signatory warrants and represents that he/she executed this Agreement in his/her authorized capacity and that by his/her signature County Counsel Signature on this Agreement, he/she or the entity t<-A.
  • Sunol Quarry Conservation Plan

    Sunol Quarry Conservation Plan

    Conservation Plan For Sunol Quarry SMP-30 Site A Conservation Plan by Oliver de Silva, Inc. to Enhance the Biological Resources of the Sunol Quarry SMP-30 Project Area in Alameda County, California December 15, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Conservation Plan was prepared by Oliver de Silva, Inc., the Alameda Creek Alliance, and the Center for Biological Diversity, to protect and enhance the biological resources in the vicinity of the Sunol Quarry Site in the Sunol Valley. The conservation measures in this plan will significantly reduce the potential impacts of Sunol Quarry mining operations on native wildlife species and their habitats, will provide further mitigation for unavoidable biological impacts, and will benefit special-status species and their habitats in the vicinity of the project. As detailed herein, Oliver de Silva (“ODS”) will fund, implement and monitor the avoidance, mitigation, and restoration measures detailed in this Conservation Plan to best protect and conserve special-status species and their habitats prior to and during the development of quarry operations at the Sunol Quarry, under Surface Mining Permit 30 (“SMP-30”), Revised SMP-30 and Further Revised SMP-30. In 2006 ODS submitted a proposal for a mining lease in the Sunol Valley, SMP-30. ODS contemplates additional, future mining operations at the SMP-30 site, subject to the Approval of a revised surface mining permit for the site (“Revised SMP-30”) and a further revised surface mining permit for the site (“Further Revised SMP-30”). Activities under SMP-30 and Revised SMP-30 are separate and distinct projects, with independent utility, from mining activities at Apperson Ridge pursuant to SMP-17 and Revised SMP-17.
  • Altamont Corridor Vision

    Altamont Corridor Vision

    Rob Padgette Deputy Managing Director Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority 1 3 4 Connecting to other systems • Free transit transfer program » 22 rail and transit services » Connection to BART at Richmond • Bike access program » Station eLockers and onboard storage racks • First mile/last mile partnerships » Scoot, Jump, Ford GoBike, Gig, Getaround 5 Surging South Bay Ridership Percent Station 2015 2018 Increase San Jose 168,300 191,500 14% Santa Clara 30,300 56,600 87% Santa Clara/Great America 131,100 178,600 36% Freemont 35,500 44,800 26% Total 365,200 471,500 29% Capitol Corridor’s Vision Plan CCJPA Vision Plan 2013 Vision Plan Update High-level, aspirational vision of faster, more frequent, cleaner, quieter, better connected and altogether more attractive rail service 2016 Vision Implementation Plan Engineering plan of segmented, phased improvements to achieve Vision Plan California State Rail Vision State Rail Plan (2018) 2022 Short-Term Plan • Improve service speeds, frequencies, and transit connectivity between Oakland and San Jose 2027 Mid-Term Plan • Open an East Bay hub station to allow connections north- south between Oakland and San Jose and east-west across a Dumbarton Bay Crossing • Half-hourly peak and at least bi-hourly off-peak services between Oakland and San Jose Sacramento to Roseville Service Expansions Third Track • Sacramento to Roseville Third Track: 10 roundtrips between Sacramento and Roseville • Oakland to San Jose Phase 2: service re-route to cut 13 min from existing travel Oakland to San Jose time and to
  • Task 1: Compilation of Existing Map and Trench Data (Year 1)

    Task 1: Compilation of Existing Map and Trench Data (Year 1)

    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT DIGITAL COMPILATION OF NORTHERN CALAVERAS FAULT DATA FOR THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MAP DATABASE: COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH WITH WILLIAM LETTIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Recipient: William Lettis & Associates, Inc. 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Principal Investigators: Keith I. Kelson and Sean T. Sundermann William Lettis & Associates, Inc., 1777 Botelho Dr., Suite 262, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (tel: 925-256-6070; fax: 925-256-6076; email: [email protected]) Program Element: Priority III: Construction of a Community Quaternary Fault Database U. S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Award Number 05HQGR0023 October 2007 Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number 05HQGR0023. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. ABSTRACT This study presents a new digital map compilation of fault traces along the Northern Calaveras fault in the eastern San Francisco Bay region. The work described herein is part of a collaborative effort between private and academic geologists and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to construct a Quaternary fault map and database for the San Francisco Bay area. The goal of this study is to compile geologic data on the active Northern Calaveras fault in a digital format for the Northern California Quaternary Fault Map Database (NCQFMD). This new compilation of fault traces revises and builds upon previous work between Calaveras Reservoir on the south and the town of Danville on the north.