DOCSLIB.ORG

A Foray Into the Worlds of Animals and Humans " 1 5 1 • 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Foray Into the Worlds of Animals and Humans A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS "151 •0413 2OV0 Jakob von Uexkiill CARY WOLFE, SERIES EDITOR 12 A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans with A Theory of Meaning Jakob von Uexkiill A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS 11 Insect Media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology Jussi Parikka OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS 10 Cosmopolitics II Isabelle Stengers 9 Cosmopolitics I miWA THEORY OF MEANING Isabelle Stengers 8 What Is Posthumanism ? Cary Wolfe Translated by Joseph D. O'Neil 7 Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic John Protevi Introduction by Dorion Sagan 6 Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times Afterword by Geoffrey Winthr op-Young Nicole Shukin 5 Dorsality: Thinking Back through Technology and Politics posthuman ties 12 David Wills 4 Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy Roberto Esposito 3 When Species Meet Donna J. Haraway 2 The Poetics of DNA Judith Roof University of Minnesota Press 1 The Parasite Minneapolis • London Michel Serres Jakob von Uexkiill CARY WOLFE, SERIES EDITOR 12 A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans with A Theory of Meaning Jakob von Uexkiill A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS 11 Insect Media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology Jussi Parikka OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS 10 Cosmopolitics II Isabelle Stengers 9 Cosmopolitics I miWA THEORY OF MEANING Isabelle Stengers 8 What Is Posthumanism ? Cary Wolfe Translated by Joseph D. O'Neil 7 Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic John Protevi Introduction by Dorion Sagan 6 Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times Afterword by Geoffrey Winthr op-Young Nicole Shukin 5 Dorsality: Thinking Back through Technology and Politics posthuman ties 12 David Wills 4 Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy Roberto Esposito 3 When Species Meet Donna J. Haraway 2 The Poetics of DNA Judith Roof University of Minnesota Press 1 The Parasite Minneapolis • London Michel Serres The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance provided for the publication of this book CONTENTS by the Margaret W. Harmon Fund. Originally published as Streifziige durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen, copyright 1934 Verlag von Julius Springer; and as Bedeutungslehre, copyright 1940 Verlag von J. A. Barth. English translation, Introduction, Translator's Introduction, and Afterword copyright 2010 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota l Introduction Umwelt after Uexkiill Dorion Sagan All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any 35 Translator's Introduction means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 41 Foreword Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu 44 Introduction Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 53 Environment Spaces Uexkiill, Jakob von, 1864-1944. 63 The Farthest Plane [Streifziige durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. English] A foray into the worlds of animals and humans ; with, A theory of 70 Perception Time meaning / Jakob von Uexkiill; translated by Joseph D. O'Neil; 73 Simple Environments introduction by Dorion Sagan; afterword by Geoffrey Winthrop- Young.—1st University of Minnesota Press ed. 79 Form and Movement as Perception Marks p. cm.—(Posthumanities series ; v. 12) Includes bibliographical references and index. 86 Goal and Plan ISBN 978-0-8166-5899-2 (he : alk. paper) 92 Perception Image and Effect Image ISBN 978-0-8166-5900-5 (pb : alk. paper) 1. Animal behavior. 2. Psychology, Comparative. 3. Perception. I, Uexkiill, 98 The Familiar Path Jakob von, 1864-1944. Theory of meaning. II. Title. 103 Home and Territory QL751.U413 2010 590.1—dc22 2010026059 108 The Companion Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper H3 Search Image and Search Tone The University of Minnesota is an 119 Magical Environments equal-opportunity educator and employer. 126 The Same Subject as Object in Different Environments 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 10 987654321 133 Conclusion The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance provided for the publication of this book CONTENTS by the Margaret W. Harmon Fund. Originally published as Streifziige durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen, copyright 1934 Verlag von Julius Springer; and as Bedeutungslehre, copyright 1940 Verlag von J. A. Barth. English translation, Introduction, Translator's Introduction, and Afterword copyright 2010 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota l Introduction Umwelt after Uexkiill Dorion Sagan All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any 35 Translator's Introduction means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 41 Foreword Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu 44 Introduction Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 53 Environment Spaces Uexkiill, Jakob von, 1864-1944. 63 The Farthest Plane [Streifziige durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. English] A foray into the worlds of animals and humans ; with, A theory of 70 Perception Time meaning / Jakob von Uexkiill; translated by Joseph D. O'Neil; 73 Simple Environments introduction by Dorion Sagan; afterword by Geoffrey Winthrop- Young.—1st University of Minnesota Press ed. 79 Form and Movement as Perception Marks p. cm.—(Posthumanities series ; v. 12) Includes bibliographical references and index. 86 Goal and Plan ISBN 978-0-8166-5899-2 (he : alk. paper) 92 Perception Image and Effect Image ISBN 978-0-8166-5900-5 (pb : alk. paper) 1. Animal behavior. 2. Psychology, Comparative. 3. Perception. I, Uexkiill, 98 The Familiar Path Jakob von, 1864-1944. Theory of meaning. II. Title. 103 Home and Territory QL751.U413 2010 590.1—dc22 2010026059 108 The Companion Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper H3 Search Image and Search Tone The University of Minnesota is an 119 Magical Environments equal-opportunity educator and employer. 126 The Same Subject as Object in Different Environments 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 10 987654321 133 Conclusion A THEORY OF MEANING INTRODUCTION UMWELT AFTER UEXKOLL 139 Carriers of Meaning 146 Environment and Dwelling-shell Dorion Sagan 150 Utilization of Meaning 157 The Interpretation of the Spider's Web 161 Form Development Rule and Meaning Rule 168 The Meaning Rule as the Bridging of Two Elementary Rules ALTHOUGH LIFE BOTH TRANSFORMS MATTER and processes in­ 171 The Composition Theory of Nature formation, the two are not proportional: the touch of a button 182 The Sufferance of Meaning may ignite a hydrogen bomb, while the combined military ef­ forts of Orwellian nations will fail to make a little girl smile. 185 The Technique of Nature Thus life is not just about matter and how it immediately inter­ 190 Counterpoint as a Motif/Motive of Form Development acts with itself but also how that matter interacts in intercon­ 195 Progress nected systems that include organisms in their separately per­ ceiving worlds—worlds that are necessarily incomplete, even 200 Summary and Conclusion for scientists and philosophers who, like their objects of study, form only a tiny part of the giant, perhaps infinite universe 209 Afterword they observe. Nonetheless, information and matter-energy are Bubbles and Webs: A Backdoor Stroll definitely connected: for example, as I was jogging just now, through the Readings of Uexkiill Geoffrey Winthrop-Young hearing my own breathing, I was reminded to share the crucial fact that the major metabolism that sustains us perceiving ani­ mals is the redox gradient,1 which powers the flow of electrons 244 Notes between the hydrogen-rich carbon compounds of our food and 258 Index the oxygen we take in from the atmosphere, a chemical differ­ ence which itself reminded me, in one of life's circumlocution- ary moments, of its own existence. Once upon a time, says Nietzsche, in a cosmos glitter­ ing forth innumerable solar systems, there was a star "on which clever animals invented knowledge [however] . After nature had drawn a few breaths the star grew cold, and the clever animals had to die." Their knowledge did not preserve their life- form or lead to its longevity but only gave its "owner and pro­ ducer ... [a feeling of great] importance, as if the world pivoted around it. But if we could communicate with the mosquito [some A THEORY OF MEANING INTRODUCTION UMWELT AFTER UEXKOLL 139 Carriers of Meaning 146 Environment and Dwelling-shell Dorion Sagan 150 Utilization of Meaning 157 The Interpretation of the Spider's Web 161 Form Development Rule and Meaning Rule 168 The Meaning Rule as the Bridging of Two Elementary Rules ALTHOUGH LIFE BOTH TRANSFORMS MATTER and processes in­ 171 The Composition Theory of Nature formation, the two are not proportional: the touch of a button 182 The Sufferance of Meaning may ignite a hydrogen bomb, while the combined military ef­ forts of Orwellian nations will fail to make a little girl smile. 185 The Technique of Nature Thus life is not just about matter and how it immediately inter­ 190 Counterpoint as a Motif/Motive of Form Development acts with itself but also how that matter interacts in intercon­ 195 Progress
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review: Marcello Barbieri (Ed) (2007) Introduction to Biosemiotics. the New Biological Synthesis
    tripleC 5(3): 104-109, 2007 ISSN 1726-670X http://tripleC.uti.at Review: Marcello Barbieri (Ed) (2007) Introduction to Biosemiotics. The new biological synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer Günther Witzany telos – Philosophische Praxis Vogelsangstr. 18c A-5111-Buermoos/Salzburg Austria E-mail: [email protected] 1 Thematic background without utterances we act as non-uttering indi- viduals being dependent on the discourse de- Maybe it is no chance that the discovery of the rived meaning processes of a linguistic (e.g. sci- genetic code occurred during the hot phase of entific) community. philosophy of science discourse about the role of This position marks the primary difference to language in generating models of scientific ex- the subject of knowledge of Kantian knowledge planation. The code-metaphor was introduced theories wherein one subject alone in principle parallel to other linguistic terms to denote lan- could be able to generate sentences in which it guage like features of the nucleic acid sequence generates knowledge. This abstractive fallacy molecules such as “code without commas” was ruled out in the early 50s of the last century (Francis Crick). At the same time the 30 years of being replaced by the “community of investiga- trying to establish an exact scientific language to tors” (Peirce) represented by the scientific com- delimit objective sentences from non-objective munity in which every single scientist is able the ones derived one of his peaks in the linguistic place his utterance looking for being integrated turn. in the discourse community in which his utter- ances will be proven whether they are good ar- 1.1 Changing subjects of knowledge guments or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Categories
    Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. (2005). Learning and using relational categories. In W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman & P. W. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory. Washington, DC: APA. Relational Categories Dedre Gentner and Kenneth J Kurtz Relational Categories This chapter is concerned with the acquisition and use of relational categories. By relational category, we mean a category whose membership is determined by a common relational structure rather than by common properties. For instance, for X to be a bridge, X must connect two other entities or points; for X to be a carnivore, X must eat animals. Relational categories contrast with entity categories such as tulip or camel, whose members share many intrinsic properties. Relational categories cohere on the basis of a core relationship ful- filled by all members. This relation may be situation-specific (e.g., passenger or accident) or enduring (e.g., carnivore or ratio). Relational categories abound in ordinary language. Some are restricted in their arguments: For example, car- nivores are animals who eat other animals. But for many relational catego- ries, the arguments can range widely: for example, a bridge can connect two concrete locations, or two generations, or two abstract ideas. As with bridge, the instances of a relational category can have few or no intrinsic properties in common with one another. Research on categories has mostly ignored relational categories, focusing instead on entity categories-categories that can be characterized in terms of intrinsic similarity among members, like those shown in Figure 9.1. Further, as Moos and Sloutsky (2004) point out, theories of categorization have often oper- ated under the assumption that all concepts are fundamentally alike.
    [Show full text]
  • A Creative Misunderstanding: Ludwig Binswanger
    Four A Creative Misunderstanding: Ludwig Binswanger No discourse on the exchange of ideas between Freudian psychoanalysis and philosophical phenomenology would be complete without mentioning the works of psychiatrist, Dr. Ludwig Binswanger. As a one-time mentor to Medard Boss, an acquaintance of Martin Heidegger, and a close friend to Sigmund Freud, Binswanger was thoroughly immersed within the historical context of the time. His continued loyalty to Freud as well as his interest in Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenology make him an especially pivotal figure in the early intersection between these two domains. Unlike many of the intellectuals who fervently opposed Freudian psychoanalysis, Binswanger never entirely rejected the importance of Freud’s work. He considered Freud’s metapsychology to be a success within the limits of scientific theory, and praised its contributions for offering a thorough and complete description of homo natura. However, Binswanger also contended that Freud’s depiction of humans as “primal” was not “the source and fount of human history,” but rather “a requirement of natural-scientific research.”1 Here, Heidegger’s philosophy was ideal in demonstrating the limitations of science when practically applied to the realm of human inquiry. His phenomenological approach also offered a means for expanding beyond science in order to understand the whole person in an effort to create a more holistic therapeutic approach. Early on, (c. 1922–7) Binswanger believed that it was Husserlian phenomenology that could provide the proper method for therapy. With the publication of Being and Time in 1927, Binswanger, without entirely abandoning Husserl, modified this somewhat when he suggested that it was Heidegger’s ontology from which “existential analysis received its decisive stimulation, its philosophical foundation and justification, as well as its methodological directives.”2 Binswanger was particularly struck by Heidegger’s critique of science as well as his elaboration of the universal and fundamental structures of human Dasein.
    [Show full text]
  • MEANING, SEMIOTECHNOLOGIES and PARTICIPATORY MEDIA Ganaele Langlois
    CULTURE MACHINE VOL 12 • 2011 MEANING, SEMIOTECHNOLOGIES AND PARTICIPATORY MEDIA Ganaele Langlois Summary What is the critical purpose of studying meaning in a digital environment which is characterized by the proliferation of meanings? In particular, online participatory media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Wikipedia and Twitter offer a constant stream of user-produced meanings. In this new context of seemingly infinite ‘semiotic democracy’ (Fiske, 1987), where anybody can say anything and have a chance to be heard, it seems that the main task is to find ways to deal with and analyze an ever-expanding field of signification. This article offers a different perspective on the question of meaning by arguing that if we are to study meaning to understand the cultural logic of digital environments, we should not focus on the content of what users are saying online, but rather on the conditions within which such a thing as user expression is possible in the first place. That is, this article argues that we should focus less on signification, and more on the question of regimes of the production and circulation of meaning. By expanding the question of meaning and using it to explore commercial participatory media platforms, this article offers a new framework for looking at online communication: one that decentres human subjects from the production of meaning and that acknowledges the technocultural dimension of meaning as constituted by a range of heterogeneous representational and informational technologies, cultural practices and linguistic values. Online participatory media platforms offer an exemplar of the new conditions of the production and circulation of meaning beyond the human level: they offer rich environments where user input is constantly augmented, ranked, classified and linked with other types of content.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Evolution: What We Need I.) the Merkwelt Ii.) the Umwelt
    What we need • Language evolution theories need to be: – Evolutionarily plausible: Consistent with fossil Language Evolution: and archeological record; with knowledge of our ancestor’s lives and structure – Consistent with what we know about language Neurological, cognitive, social? – Consistent with what we know about anatomy, including neuroanatomy MU! – Computationally plausible: Consistent with some functional understanding of language Symbols as representational flexibility Symbols as representational flexibility • As we have been discussing, symbolism is a • Insofar as this is true, language evolution may be way of increasing representational underlain by many non-linguistic incremental adaptations, each of which introduces a (perhaps very flexibility (of removing stimuli [‘goads’] slight) increase in freedom in representation: in the from the environment, and bringing them number of ways we can look at things inside) • Anything that helps us look at things in a new way (modulates our behavioral pesponses) increases • Representational flexibility may be useful in potential adaptivity AND also brings us closer to ‘true’ many many ways, many of which are not symbolism linguistic per se i.) The Merkwelt ii.) The Umwelt • A factor that is tied in more directly to representational flexibility • Jakob von Uexkull (1934): A Stroll through the Worlds of is the ability to detect those stimuli that can be used for adaptive Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds. purposes (the size of the creature's Umwelt, [German for environment]
    [Show full text]
  • Semiosphere As a Model of Human Cognition
    494 Aleksei Semenenko Sign Systems Studies 44(4), 2016, 494–510 Homo polyglottus: Semiosphere as a model of human cognition Aleksei Semenenko Department of Slavic and Baltic Languages Stockholm University 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Th e semiosphere is arguably the most infl uential concept developed by Juri Lotman, which has been reinterpreted in a variety of ways. Th is paper returns to Lotman’s original “anthropocentric” understanding of semiosphere as a collective intellect/consciousness and revisits the main arguments of Lotman’s discussion of human vs. nonhuman semiosis in order to position it in the modern context of cognitive semiotics and the question of human uniqueness in particular. In contrast to the majority of works that focus on symbolic consciousness and multimodal communication as specifi cally human traits, Lotman accentuates polyglottism and dialogicity as the unique features of human culture. Formulated in this manner, the concept of semiosphere is used as a conceptual framework for the study of human cognition as well as human cognitive evolution. Keywords: semiosphere; cognition; polyglottism; dialogue; multimodality; Juri Lotman Th e concept of semiosphere is arguably the most infl uential concept developed by the semiotician and literary scholar Juri Lotman (1922–1993), a leader of the Tartu- Moscow School of Semiotics and a founder of semiotics of culture. In a way, it was the pinnacle of Lotman’s lifelong study of culture as an intrinsic component of human individual
    [Show full text]
  • Media Theory and Semiotics: Key Terms and Concepts Binary
    Media Theory and Semiotics: Key Terms and Concepts Binary structures and semiotic square of oppositions Many systems of meaning are based on binary structures (masculine/ feminine; black/white; natural/artificial), two contrary conceptual categories that also entail or presuppose each other. Semiotic interpretation involves exposing the culturally arbitrary nature of this binary opposition and describing the deeper consequences of this structure throughout a culture. On the semiotic square and logical square of oppositions. Code A code is a learned rule for linking signs to their meanings. The term is used in various ways in media studies and semiotics. In communication studies, a message is often described as being "encoded" from the sender and then "decoded" by the receiver. The encoding process works on multiple levels. For semiotics, a code is the framework, a learned a shared conceptual connection at work in all uses of signs (language, visual). An easy example is seeing the kinds and levels of language use in anyone's language group. "English" is a convenient fiction for all the kinds of actual versions of the language. We have formal, edited, written English (which no one speaks), colloquial, everyday, regional English (regions in the US, UK, and around the world); social contexts for styles and specialized vocabularies (work, office, sports, home); ethnic group usage hybrids, and various kinds of slang (in-group, class-based, group-based, etc.). Moving among all these is called "code-switching." We know what they mean if we belong to the learned, rule-governed, shared-code group using one of these kinds and styles of language.
    [Show full text]
  • “Meaning”: Philosophical Forebears and Linguistic Descendants
    teorema Vol. XXVI/2, 2007, pp. 59-75 ISBN: 0210-1602 “Meaning”: Philosophical Forebears and Linguistic Descendants Siobhan Chapman RESUMEN Este artículo ofrece una visión general de las ideas que ayudaron a dar forma al pensamiento de Grice en “Meaning”, y considera también algunas de las respuestas más destacadas que dieron a Grice sus contemporáneos. Estos dos conjuntos de in- fluencias alimentaron el desarrollo de la teoría de la conversación de Grice, que ha te- nido un enorme impacto en el pensamiento posterior sobre el lenguaje en muchas áreas, particularmente en la disciplina lingüística conocida como “pragmática”. En las valoraciones de la obra de Grice, “Meaning” resulta a menudo ensombrecido por la teoría de la conversación, pero merece la pena volver sobre este artículo, ya que es el que establece los fundamentos generales de su filosofía del lenguaje. ABSTRACT This article offers an overview of some of the philosophical ideas that helped to shape Grice’s thinking in “Meaning”, and also considers some of the most salient re- sponses to “Meaning” from his contemporaries. These two sets of influences fed into the development of Grice’s theory of conversation, which has had an enormous im- pact on subsequent thinking about language in many areas, particularly in the linguis- tic discipline of pragmatics. “Meaning” is sometimes overshadowed by the theory of conversation in assessments of Grice’s work, but is worth revisiting because it sets out the foundations of his philosophy of language as a whole. I. INTRODUCTION Paul Grice’s “Meaning” is strikingly brief and deceptively simple- looking. At just twelve pages, it is the shortest of the five articles that appeared in volume 66 number 3 of The Philosophical Review.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Semiosphere, Revisited
    Yorgos Marinakis On the Semiosphere, Revisited Abstract The semiosphere is frequently described as a topos of complexification, namely discontinuous or heterogeneous, recursive or self-reflexive, stochastic, radically subjective, and capable of simultaneous multiple perspectives. While the topos of complexification describes the gross morphology of a model, it is not a model adequate for explaining phenomena or making predictions. The ecological theory of dual hierarchies is proposed as a framework for developing models of the semiosphere that are appropriately limited in scope and scale. In particular the semiosphere is modeled as a dual hierarchy of semiotic spaces, the dual hierarchies corresponding to the semiosis that is occurring within the dual hierarchies of ecological organization. This framework immediately solves several theoretical problems, such as clearing up conceptual inconsistencies in Lotman's concept of semiosphere. Keywords: semiotics, semiosphere, ecosystem, hierarchy theory, category theory, semiotic triad Introduction Juri Lotman's (2005) On the semiosphere, first published in 1984, introduced the concept of the semiosphere and attempted to describe its gross structural features in broad terms. The semiosphere is defined as the semiotic space outside of which semiosis cannot exist, where semiosis is any form of activity, conduct, or process that involves signs. On its face, the structure of Lotman's concept of semiosphere has difficulties, but by focusing on these difficulties one loses sight of the value of the concept. Lotman's conceives of the semiosphere as a space that carries an abstract character and possessing signs, which space he asserts is not metaphorical (therefore not abstract?) but specific (therefore material and not abstract?).
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Language in the Twentieth Century Jason Stanley Rutgers University
    Philosophy of Language in the Twentieth Century Jason Stanley Rutgers University In the Twentieth Century, Logic and Philosophy of Language are two of the few areas of philosophy in which philosophers made indisputable progress. For example, even now many of the foremost living ethicists present their theories as somewhat more explicit versions of the ideas of Kant, Mill, or Aristotle. In contrast, it would be patently absurd for a contemporary philosopher of language or logician to think of herself as working in the shadow of any figure who died before the Twentieth Century began. Advances in these disciplines make even the most unaccomplished of its practitioners vastly more sophisticated than Kant. There were previous periods in which the problems of language and logic were studied extensively (e.g. the medieval period). But from the perspective of the progress made in the last 120 years, previous work is at most a source of interesting data or occasional insight. All systematic theorizing about content that meets contemporary standards of rigor has been done subsequently. The advances Philosophy of Language has made in the Twentieth Century are of course the result of the remarkable progress made in logic. Few other philosophical disciplines gained as much from the developments in logic as the Philosophy of Language. In the course of presenting the first formal system in the Begriffsscrift , Gottlob Frege developed a formal language. Subsequently, logicians provided rigorous semantics for formal languages, in order to define truth in a model, and thereby characterize logical consequence. Such rigor was required in order to enable logicians to carry out semantic proofs about formal systems in a formal system, thereby providing semantics with the same benefits as increased formalization had provided for other branches of mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferdinand De Saussure . . . Together with His Two Great Contemporaries
    MSM01 6/18/2004 6:12 PM Page 8 Ferdinand de Saussure...together with his two great contemporaries, Emile Durkheim in sociology and Sigmund Freud in psychology...helped to set the study of human behavior on a new footing. These three thinkers realized that one could not approach an adequate understanding of human practices and institutions if one treated human behavior as a series of events similar to events in the physical world...Human behavior is different. When studying human behavior the investigator cannot simply dismiss as subjective impres- sions the meaning it has for members of a society. If people see an action as impolite, that is a crucial fact, a social fact. To ignore the meanings actions and objects have in society would be to study mere physical events. Anyone ana- lyzing human behavior is concerned not with events themselves but with events that have meaning. Saussure, Freud, and Durkheim also saw that the study of human behavior misses its best opportunities if it tries to trace the historical causes of indi- vidual events. Instead, it must focus on the functions events have within a general social framework. It must treat social facts as part of a system of con- ventions and values... How does one cope, systematically, with the apparent chaos of the modern world? This question was being asked in a variety of fields, and the replies which Saussure gives – that you cannot hope to attain an absolute or Godlike view of things but must choose a perspective, and that within this perspective objects are defined by their relations with one another, rather than by essences of some kind – are exemplary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mentalism and the Gricean Program
    Mentalism and the Gricean program Jeff Speaks phil 93914 March 27, 2008 1 Mentalism . 1 2 The Gricean program . 3 2.1 The analysis of speaker-meaning . 3 2.2 Some counterexamples to clause (1) . 4 2.3 Counterexamples based on persuasive discourse . 6 2.4 Speaker-meaning without intended effects . 7 2.5 Meaning, speaker-meaning, & Moore's paradox . 8 2.6 Assessment of Grice's account . 10 1 Mentalism Let mentalism be the view that we can explain what it is for an expression to have a meaning in a language in terms of certain of the propositional attitudes of users of the language. According to most mentalists, not just any propositional attitudes will do. The back- ground motivation for mentalist is to display the priority of thought over linguistic mean- ing, and the class of propositional attitudes is very broad, and contains attitudes very closely linked to the use of language, such as saying, asserting, and telling. When mental- ists try to give an account of language in terms of the attitudes, they try to account for facts about meaning in terms of facts about what agents intend, believe, or judge, and not in terms of what agents say or assert by uttering sentences of their language. One way of distinguishing between the relevant classes of propositional attitudes is via distinction between action-entailing and non-action-entailing attitude verbs. In the case of action-entailing attitude verbs, we can expand an ascription pα V's that σq to one of the form pBy φing, α V's that σq, where `φing' denotes some action of the referent of `α.' This class of propositional attitude verbs includes, for example, \says," \means," and \asserts"; we can expand an ascription of the form pα said that σq to one of the form pBy φing, α said that σq, and an ascription of the form pα asserted that σq to one of the form pBy φing, α asserted that σq.
    [Show full text]