FEBRUARY 2012 • Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Young Alumni Build on Early Success
OFARIZONASTATEUNIVERSITY Ahead of their time THEMAGAZINE Young alumni build on early success “It’s Time” for a new look for Sun Devil Athletics Coping with technological change Playwrights explore drama in the desert MAY 2011 | VOL. 14 NO. 4 ASU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION BOARD AND NATIONAL COUNCIL 2010–2011 OFFICERS CHAIR Chris Spinella ’83 B.S. CHAIR-ELECT George Diaz Jr. ’96 B.A., ’99 M.P.A. TREASURER President’s Letter Robert Boschee ’83 B.S., ’85 M.B.A. This month, we celebrated the achievements PAST CHAIR of the Class of 2011 at Spring Commencement. Bill Kavan ’92 B.A. This year’s graduating class is filled with PRESIDENT thousands of talented, accomplished students, many of whom have not only studied the top Christine Wilkinson ’66 B.A.E., ’76 Ph.D. challenges in their professions, but taken the first steps toward being part of the solution to BOARD OF DIRECTORS* those challenges. We also have welcomed back Barbara Clark ’84 M.Ed. the Class of 1961 whose members participated in Commencement and other Andy Hanshaw ’87 B.S. activities provided by the Alumni Association as part of Golden Reunion, the 50th anniversary of their graduation from ASU. This is such a special time as Barbara Hoffnagle ’83 M.S.E. we bring back alumni to the university to see what ASU looks like today, Ivan Johnson ’73 B.A., ’86 M.B.A. tour some of the new facilities, learn about new programs and share their Tara McCollum Plese ’78 B.A., ’84 M.P.A. fondest college memories. -
"Goodness Without Godness", with Professor Phil Zuckerman
The HSSB Secular Circular – March 2020 1 Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.SBHumanists.org MARCH 2020 Please join us for our March Speaker… How Foreign Policy Really Works: Diplomats’ Tricks of the Trade Hugh Neighbour spent four fascinating decades working around the globe as a U.S. diplomat and as a naval officer. Examine how diplomacy actually works in the real world. The talk will be followed by open discussion and a lively Q & A. Our Speaker: During his long career, Hugh Neighbour specialized in political and economic affairs, working on U.S. Foreign Service Officer (Retired) and Lecturer, Hugh Neighbour multilateral issues, including both arms control and human rights. Hugh's final diplomatic post was as Chief Arms Control Delegate for the U.S. at the OSCE in Vienna, responsible for conventional arms control across Europe, Central Asia, and North America. He was assigned to Germany when the Berlin Wall fell and Germany unified, to Bolivia when an uprising cut off food supplies for weeks, to Panama as General Noriega stole an election, and to Australia when the ANZUS treaty was fundamentally altered. He was stationed in London during the height of the Cold War, in Stockholm when non-aligned Sweden helped NATO intervene in Bosnia, and in the Fiji Islands where he ran U.S. relations with 8 island countries and territories. He was awarded the Secretary of State's Career Achievement Award. Prior to this, Hugh was a bridge watch officer in the U.S. Navy. After service at sea on a missile cruiser, he served ashore in the Middle East. -
LIGO SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION VIRGO COLLABORATION the LSC
LIGO SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION VIRGO COLLABORATION Document Type LIGO–T1100322 VIR-0353A-11 The LSC-Virgo white paper on gravitational wave data analysis Science goals, status and plans, priorities (2011–2012 edition) The LSC-Virgo Data Analysis Working Groups, the Data Analysis Software Working Group, the Detector Characterization Working Group and the Computing Committee WWW: http://www.ligo.org/ and http://www.virgo.infn.it Processed with LATEX on 2011/10/13 LSC-Virgo data analysis white paper Contents 1 Introduction 6 2 The characterization of the data 8 2.1 LSC-Virgo-wide detector characterization priorities . .8 2.2 LIGO Detector Characterization . .9 2.2.1 Introduction . .9 2.2.2 Preparing for the Advanced Detector Era . 10 2.2.3 Priorities for LIGO Detector Characterization . 11 2.2.4 Data Run Support . 11 2.2.5 Software Infrastructure . 12 2.2.6 Noise Transients . 14 2.2.7 Spectral Features . 15 2.2.8 Calibration . 16 2.2.9 Timing . 17 2.3 GEO Detector Characterization . 18 2.3.1 Introduction . 18 2.3.2 Transient Studies . 19 2.3.3 Stationary Studies . 20 2.3.4 Stability Studies . 21 2.3.5 Calibration . 21 2.3.6 Resources . 22 2.4 Virgo Detector Characterization . 22 2.4.1 Introduction . 22 2.4.2 Calibration and h-reconstruction . 23 2.4.3 Environmental noise . 24 2.4.4 Virgo Data Quality and vetoes . 26 2.4.5 Monitoring Tools . 28 2.4.6 Noise monitoring tools . 29 2.4.7 The Virgo Data Base . 31 2.4.8 Virgo detector characterization next steps . -
Anti-Universe Exists Arya Tanmay Gupta Department of Computer Science, Ramanujan College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India
24584 Arya Tanmay Gupta/ Elixir Space Sci. 71 (2014) 24584-24585 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Space Science Elixir Space Sci. 71 (2014) 24584-24585 Anti-Universe exists Arya Tanmay Gupta Department of Computer Science, Ramanujan College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Universe is continuously expanding, and is observed to expand at a continuous increasing Received: 16 April 2014; speed, much greater than that of light, though the theory of relativity destroys the Received in revised form: relevance of this statement. This gave birth to a theory called Big Bang theory, which says 20 May 2014; universe was born from a single point, started from pure energy and then came matter, Accepted: 30 May 2014; space, and time. Within a short time, it is said to have “fight” with anti-matter and a small part of total matter constructed this whole universe. Keywords © 2014 Elixir All rights reserved Universe, Expansion, Anti, Matter. Introduction universe was infant enough. The first element formed was About 14 billion years ago “something” happened. We do Hydrogen, then formed Helium and then traces of Lithium.[1] not know what happened, why it happened. But we know that an It is believed that when our universe was small, matter enormous amount of energy erupted out of precisely “nothing”. encountered its biggest enemy, anti-matter. For every billion That energy expanded all around and slowly it cooled down and particles of anti-matter, there were billion and one particles of converted into matter, off course according to Einstein’s matter. -
January 2021 Newsletter
APS Division of In this issue Astrophysics • April Meeting Online • Upcoming DAP election alert Electronic Newsletter January 2021 • APS Fellows • Bethe Prize Winner • Student/Postdoc Travel Grants • April Meeting: DAP and Plenary Programs & Abstract Categories • Snowmass Update APS DAP Officers 2020–2021: Finalize your plans now to attend the April 2021 meeting held virtually this year. A • Chair: Glennys Farrar number of plenary and invited sessions will • Past Chair: Joshua Frieman feature presentations by DAP members. Here are the key details: • Chair Elect: Chris Fryer • Vice Chair: Daniel Holz What: April 2021 APS Meeting • Secretary/Treasurer: Judith Racusin When: April 17 - 20, 2021 • Deputy Sec./Treasurer: Amy Furniss Where: Online Abstract Deadline: Jan 8, 2021, 5 pm EST • Division Councilor: Cole Miller Travel Grant Deadline: Jan 31, 2021 • Member-at-Large: Stefano Profumo Early Registration Deadline: Feb 26, 2021 • Member-at-Large: Ignacio Taboada Late Registration Deadline: Mar 26, 2021 • Member-at-Large: Erin Kara • Member-at-Large: Laura Blecha The 2021 April Meeting will be virtual. Questions? Comments? Detailed information for the meeting, including details on registration and the scientific Newsletter editors: program can be found online at https://april.aps.org/ Amy Furniss [email protected] HEADS-UP: The ELECTION for next year’s DAP Executive Committee and chairline will Judith Racusin be held soon. Be on the lookout for the [email protected] announcement from APS, and please vote! 1 Dear DAP, Please see the January 2021 DAP newsletter below. It will be archived on the DAP website (https://www.aps.org/units/dap/newsletters/index.cfm). -
The University of Chicago Astronomy and Cosmology
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ASTRONOMY AND COSMOLOGY WITH GRAVITATIONAL WAVES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS BY MAYA FISHBACH CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2020 Copyright c 2020 by Maya Fishbach All Rights Reserved לאמא ואבא To my parents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xv ABSTRACT . xvi 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 ARE LIGO'S BLACK HOLES MADE FROM SMALLER BLACK HOLES? . 5 2.1 Abstract . .6 2.2 Introduction . .7 2.3 Methods . 10 2.3.1 Hierarchical Merger Spin Distribution . 10 2.3.2 Mixture Model Analysis . 14 2.4 Results . 20 2.5 Conclusion . 24 3 WHERE ARE LIGO'S BIG BLACK HOLES? . 25 3.1 Abstract . 26 3.2 Introduction . 27 3.3 Sensitive volume . 31 3.4 Fitting the Mass Distribution . 34 3.5 Results . 38 3.5.1 Non-detection of heavy BBHs . 38 3.5.2 Bayesian evidence in favor of mass gap . 40 3.5.3 Joint power law{maximum mass fit . 43 3.6 Discussion . 47 3.6.1 Effect of Redshift Evolution . 47 3.6.2 Distribution of mass ratios . 48 3.6.3 Extending to non-power-law mass distributions . 49 3.6.4 Are there BBHs beyond the gap? . 49 3.7 Conclusion . 50 4 DOES THE BLACK HOLE MERGER RATE EVOLVE WITH REDSHIFT? . 52 4.1 Abstract . 53 4.2 Introduction . 54 4.3 Detected redshift distribution . 55 4.4 Joint Mass-redshift Model . 58 4.4.1 Redshift Model A . -
Does God Exist – the Rational Approach
Against Atheism: The Case for God Written for the Rational Believer Toby Baxendale Published by Toby Baxendale [insert contact details] © 2017 Toby Baxendale Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Quotations marked NRSV are taken from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. 2 Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Introduction 1. The (Not So) Brave New World Is a rapprochement between faith and reason possible? Do you have to have faith in something so obvious as the natural belief in the external world? Reason is faith cultivating itself 2. Faith and the Scientists An apostate scientist dares to suggest his community is faith based The great methodological misunderstandings of science Religion and science: enemies or allies? 3. Our Medieval, Dark Age, Primitive, Superstitious, Religious (Christian), Off-with-the-Fairies Ancestors! The widely held, inaccurate view of the history of science Our much-maligned pre-Enlightenment ancestors The two great scientists, Copernicus and Galileo: standing on the shoulders of their great ancient and medieval predecessors Confident denial or conceit wrapped up as wisdom? 4. The Surprising Friend of Theism: Evolutionary Method Evolution and the creative process Evolution 2.0 Who made God then? 5. The Current Canon of Science The ever-moving gospel of science Appearance and reality Space and time The timelessness of reality Time and physics Quantum wonderland Reconciling the Newtonian big and the quantum small Theories of big and small worlds 3 In the beginning, at time zero 6. -
“ > > > > > > STEPHEN C. MEYER ”
HARPER ONE | March 30, 2021 release “This book makes it clear that far from being an un- scientific claim, intelligent design is valid science.” —Dr. Brian D. Josephson, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge, Fellow of the Royal Society, Nobel Laureate in Physics Key Points INSPIRING HOPE: The scientific rediscovery of God provides hope of purpose and meaning to human existence, > contrary to the claims of atheists who assert that human life lacks any ultimate significance. > THEISTIC IMPLICATIONS: Recent discoveries in cosmology showing the universe had a beginning have decidedly theistic implications; namely, they point to a transcendent creator as the cause of the origin of the universe. A UNIVERSE FROM SOMETHING: Physicists such as Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss, who claim to have > explained the origin of the universe from nothing but the laws of physics, inadvertently advance ideas that actually support the God hypothesis. > TACKLING THE MULTIVERSE: The book shows why positing one God is a better explanation than the multiverse hypothesis for the fine-tuning of the physical parameters that have made life possible. > MASTER PROGRAMMER: The book shows that recent discoveries about DNA point to a master programmer or designer for life. > JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION: Judeo-Christian ideas provided the inspiration for science during the period of the scientific revolution. Devoutly religious scientists such as Johannes Kepler, Robert Boyle, and Sir Isaac Newton show that science and Christianity have not always been at war, contrary to the claims of atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, Neil Tyson, Bill Nye, and others. When you don’t understand the details of living systems, ignorance permits discounting a Creator. -
Plucked from the Vacuum
COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS quantum scales during its earliest stages. The later accelerating expansion might be driven by the ‘dark energy’ of the vacuum itself — a seething ocean of virtual particle pairs popping in and out of existence as a result of quantum uncertainty. Furthermore, Krauss points out, our Uni- verse seems to have a net gravitational energy that is suspiciously close to zero: its exist- HEIDELBERG UNIV. SPRINGEL, HITS, V. ence may ‘cost’ nothing, requiring no energy input. This raises the possibility of the ulti- mate free lunch — of a cosmos that is merely a piece of borrowed stuff, having appeared spontaneously, like a virtual particle, and been filled with matter and radiation sim- ply as a consequence of the energy of empty The cooling Universe enabled galaxies to form, as this simulation shows. space. Ours may be one of an infinite array of universe-like things, just one instance in COSMOLOGY a multiverse. It would be easy for this remarkable story to revel in self-congratulation, but Krauss steers it soberly and with grace, taking time to let the Plucked from reader digest the material. His discussion of the multiverse is a good example: he lays out the possibilities and scientific and philosophi- cal implications without beating the drum the vacuum for any one hypothesis. His asides on how he views each piece of science and its chances of being right are refreshingly honest. A tale of multiverses, cosmic inflation and dark energy He notes that a number of vital empirical grips Caleb Scharf. discoveries are, ominously, missing from our cosmic model. -
For Thought: Origins
MEDIA RELEASE Monday 18 May GP tickets on sale Friday 22 May SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE & UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE present FOR THOUGHT: ORIGINS Sydney Opera House (28 June) & Melbourne Wheeler Centre (30 June) Sydney Opera House and the University of Melbourne have partnered to present three events over the next year, with Ideas at the House taking their For Thought series interstate to the Wheeler Centre. For Thought is an opportunity for the world’s leading thinkers to immerse themselves and audiences in the particulars of a topic; discussing the latest cutting-edge research, the newest theories, or the history of how something came to be. Professor Lawrence Krauss and Professor Paul Davies will commence the series with a discussion about the origins of life, the Universe and mankind. The event will take the form of separate keynotes from Krauss and Davies, followed by a panel with an audience Q&A where they will be joined by the University of Melbourne’s Professor Rachel Webster and additional speakers to be announced shortly. The event will include Krauss discussing our fascination with the universe and our most fundamental questions concerning its origins; How did the universe come into being and what are the elements that set it on the trajectory that brought it to its current state? Davies will continue with the origins of life, one of the great outstanding mysteries of science. Joined by Professor Webster, the panel will discuss what the future holds for cosmology and the important questions that still need to be answered. Head of Talks & Ideas at the Sydney Opera House, Ann Mossop, said, “Our For Thought series is an opportunity to delve deeper into topics of great importance and for our audiences to hear thinkers from Australia and around the world talk about their ideas and research. -
Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism)
Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism) Christian de Ronde∗ Philosophy Institute Dr. A. Korn, Buenos Aires University - CONICET Engineering Institute - National University Arturo Jauretche, Argentina. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Brussels Free University, Belgium. Abstract Quantum Mechanics (QM) has faced deep controversies and debates since its origin when Werner Heisenberg proposed the first mathematical formalism capable to operationally account for what had been recently discov- ered as the new field of quantum phenomena. Today, even though we have reached a standardized version of QM which is taught in Universities all around the world, there is still no consensus regarding the conceptual reference of the theory and, if or if not, it can refer to something beyond measurement outcomes. In this work we will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics which is responsible for having intro- duced within the theory of quanta a harmful combination of metaphysical dogmatism and naive empiricism. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear. Key-words: Interpretation, explanation, representation, quantum theory. Dogma: A fixed, especially religious, belief or set of beliefs that people are expected to accept without any doubts.1 1 “Nobody Understands Quantum Mechanics” arXiv:2009.00487v1 [physics.hist-ph] 1 Sep 2020 During his lecture at Cornell University in 1964, the U.S. -
The Greatest Story Ever Told
The Greatest Story Ever Told there are any laws governing it cannot be made I love science! I did not excel in chemistry or sense of unless there is an uncaused cause physics in my school days, but in my adult life I sustaining that world in being, a cause that exists soak up as many popular presentations of scientific of absolute necessity rather than merely discovery as I can; in particular, physics and contingently (as the world itself and the laws that cosmology. The discoveries about the nature of govern it are merely contingent). [ reality and the universe by Einstein and those who have followed him up to this very day are so awesome that they seem to enter into the realm of the mystical. My faith in the awesome, mysterious power of our Creator God is only enhanced by these discoveries: It is not threatened the least little bit! This past Friday I heard an interview on the “Science Friday” program of National Public Radio featuring the Physicist, Lawrence Krauss. Krauss has a book coming out this month entitled “The Think of it this way: you can’t find out why checkers Greatest Story Ever Told . so far.” It is clear boards exist by looking at the rules of checkers that this title is a deliberate swipe at themselves, which concern only what goes Christianity, in particular, and religious belief, on within the game. The rules tell you how each in general. Krauss is among those in the scientific piece moves, how the game is won, and so forth.