Who's Who Legal: Private Client 2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ELA Annual Report 2012-2013
The Honourable Mr Justice Langsta President Employment Appeal Tribunal England & Wales David Latham President Employment Tribunals England & Wales Shona Simon President Employment Tribunals Scotland Lady Anne Smith (to March 2013) Chair Employment Appeal Tribunal Scotland Lady Valerie Stacey (from March 2013) Chair Employment Appeal Tribunal Scotland ELA Management Committee 2012 - 2014 Chair Richard Fox Deputy Chair Richard Linskell Treasurer Damian Phillips Secretary Fiona Bolton Editor, ELA Briefing Anna Henderson Chair, Training Committee Gareth Brahams Chair, Legislative & Policy Committee Bronwyn McKenna ELA Management Committee 2012 - 2014 Chair, International Committee Juliet Carp Chair, Pro Bono Committee Paul Daniels Representative of the Bar Paul Epstein QC In-house Representative Alison Leitch (to January 2013) Mark Hunt (from February 2013) Regional Representatives London & South East – Betsan Criddle and Eleena Misra Midlands – Ranjit Dhindsa North East – Anjali Sharma North West – Naeema Choudry Scotland – Joan Cradden South Wales – Nick Cooksey South West – Sean McHugh Members at Large Merrill April Stuart Brittenden Yvette Budé Karen Mortenson Catherine Taylor ELA Law Society Council Seat Tom Flanagan Life Vice Presidents Dame Janet Gaymer DBE QC Jane Mann Fraser Younson Vice President Joanne Owers ELA Support Head of Operations Lindsey Woods ELA Administration - Byword Sandra Harris Charley Masarati Emily Masarati Jeanette Masarati Claire Paley Finance Administrator Angela Gordon Website Manager Cynthia Clerk Website Support and Maintenance Ian Piper, Tellura Information Service Ltd Bronwen Reid, BR Enterprises Ltd PR Consultants Clare Turnbull, Kysen PR Chair Richard Fox, Kingsley Napley LLP Deputy Chair Richard Linskell, Ogletree Deakins This has been an extraordinary year for ELA and not just because 2013 marks our 20th Anniversary! Until relatively recently, there was a view that employment law had “plateaued”, and that the rate of change had started to mellow. -
REAL ESTATE TEAM of the YEAR Sponsored by Edwards Gibson CLIFFORD CHANCE/EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND/NETWORK RAIL NICHOLAS BARTLETT, CATHY CRICK, ANGELA KEARNS
The Project Condor legal team with Jon Vivian of Edwards Gibson REAL ESTATE TEAM OF THE YEAR Sponsored by Edwards Gibson CLIFFORD CHANCE/EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND/NETWORK RAIL NICHOLAS BARTLETT, CATHY CRICK, ANGELA KEARNS SEAMLESS COLLABORATION ON A GAME-CHANGING TRANSACTION Described by the FT as ‘one of the largest ever UK real estate deals’, lease seen in the real estate market’. Clifford Chance joined in March this trio of legal teams combined seamlessly on Project Condor – 2018 ‘given the complexity of the transaction and the number Network Rail’s sale of its commercial real estate, comprising 5,200 and calibre of bidders interested in the portfolio’ – and led on properties, for £1.45bn to Blackstone and Telereal Trillium. negotiations with bidders, financing and regulatory issues. Cathy Eversheds advised Network Rail, working on Condor for three Crick, general counsel (property) for Network Rail said: ‘Eversheds years designing the structure and template: managing the bidding Sutherland and Clifford Chance proved to be the perfect combination process from 130 interested parties down to one; using AI for of advisers to deliver the most complex real estate transaction in the exchange and completion; and ‘drafting possibly the most complex history of the railway.’ HIGHLY COMMENDED issues surrounding privacy and security TAYLOR WESSING BURGES SALMON/ specific to the PRC. MARK RAJBENBACH TRANSPORT FOR LONDON Advising InTown Group on the acquisition PHILIP BEER, KATIE SULLIVAN FLADGATE of 20 UK hotels and the associated Law firm and in-house team collaborated NICK MUMBY management platform from Apollo fully on the Albert Island regeneration in Advising Hodson Developments on the Global Management for more than The Royal Docks, one of the last big GLA acquisition, financing and development £700m – InTown’s first venture into sites awaiting transformative regeneration. -
September 14, 2010
CROSS-BORDER DISPUTE RESOLUTION: THE PERSPECTIVE FOR RUSSIA AND THE CIS The Lotte Hotel, Moscow | 8 bld.2, Novinskiy Boulevard SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 Judicial Assistance and Enforcement Proceedings International Asset Recovery Business and Corporate Raiding Disputes Involving Russian State and State Entities Late-Breaking Developments CONFERENCE WITH SUPPORT OF: STRATEGIC PARTNER: SPONSORS CONFERENCE STRATEGIC PARTNER CONFERENCE PARTNERS LUNCHEON SPONSOR PRE-CONFERENCE SPEAKER DINNER SPONSOR CONFERENCE DELEGATE BAG SPONSOR THERMAL MUGS SPONSOR NETWORKING BREAK SPONSORS MEETING SUPPORTER COOPERATING ENTITIES Federal Chamber of Advocates COOPERATING ENTITIES Moscow City Chamber of Advocates MEDIA SPONSORS Cross-Border Dispute Resolution: The Perspective for Russia and the CIS PROGRAM AGENDA All events to be held at the Lotte Hotel, Moscow located at 8 bld.2, Novinskiy Boulevard, unless otherwise indicated. 7:30 AM Registration and Breakfast Maxim Kulkov, Goltsblat BLP, Moscow, Russia Charles D. Schmerler, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, New York USA 8:30 AM Opening Session Moderator & Program Chair: Glenn P. Hendrix, Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta, Georgia USA Welcome: Glenn P. Hendrix, Immediate Past Chair, American Bar Association 10:30 AM Networking Break Section of International Law, Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta, Georgia USA 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Introductions: Show Me the Money: Recovering Assets Abroad Andrew Somers, President and Chief Executive Officer, American Chamber of Commerce in Russia, Moscow, Russia "Winning" the case is great, but did you prepare upfront for the hard part -- actually collecting the money? While never easy against a recalcitrant Opening Remarks: debtor, recovery is especially difficult if the assets are tucked away The Honorable Aleksander Vladimirovich Konovalov, Minister of offshore. -
Achieving More: from Great to Greater
THE INSTITUTE OF BARRISTERS’ CLERKS’ CONFERENCE 2017 Achieving More: From Great to Greater Venue: Pullman London St Pancras Hotel, 100 – 110 Euston Road, London NW1 2AJ Date: Saturday 11th November 2017 Morning Agenda 9.15 AM Coffee/Registration plus Sponsors’ Exhibition 10.00 AM Conference Welcome by Cliff Holland Conference Chairman, Senior Practice Manager, Matrix Chambers 10.10 AM Conference Welcome by Nick Hill IBC Chairman, Senior Clerk, 3 New Square 10.20 AM Keynote Speech by Andrew Walker QC Vice Chairman of the Bar 10.40 AM Guest Speaker: Robert Rinder (also known as Judge Rinder) Barrister, 2 Hare Court 11.20 AM Coffee & Refreshments 11.45 AM Open Forum Moderator: Cliff Holland, Senior Practice Manager, Matrix Chambers Panel: Andrew Walker QC, Vice Chairman of the Bar Mrs Justice Whipple DBE Tony McDaid, Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, No 5 Chambers Sam Mercer, Head of Policy, Equality & Diversity and CSR, Bar Council David Osborne, Solicitor, Old Bailey Solicitors 12.45 PM Speech by FREEBAR Introduction to FreeBar, the LGBT+ network for the Bar A short presentation by this network on the importance of inclusivity in chambers Speaker: Alex Southern, Clerk, Brick Court Chambers 1.00 PM Lunch plus Sponsors’ Exhibition Morning Agenda Afternoon Agenda 2.15 PM Workshop A Remember to be Remembered Ongoing brain research clearly shows that we can infl uence (and develop) our own memory and that of others far more than previously thought. This workshop focuses on ‘how’ memory is strengthened and ‘why’ the brain engages in this manner. This session is not just about listening to someone talk… Speaker: Martijn van der Spoel, Chartered Psychologist, Glia Learning 2.15 PM Workshop B Fair Allocation of Work Practical guidance and chambers experiences for monitoring the allocation of work for equality and diversity purposes. -
LBAS07 IBC.Qxp 19/2/07 15:04 Page Iii
LBAS07 p28-48 19/2/07 15:09 Page 48 Law firm of the year WINNER fast-growing Nordic private equity market. With a clearly defined European growth strategy and a rejuvenated banking practice complementing the firm’s historic reliance on UK Ashurst private equity mandates, Ashurst is a firm on the up. ‘There Simon Bromwich, managing partner; are six firms in the Magic Circle and we rank as the seventh Geoffrey Green, senior partner firm. I think we are heading towards that group,’ said one The comeback kids Ashurst partner, in a comment typical of the firm’s new-found ‘Our aim is to be at the top of whatever we do,’ said confidence. Ashurst partner Geoffrey Green, talking to Legal Business last year. And 2005/06 was the year when Ashurst finally came of age as a confidently branded, progressive law firm in its own right – as opposed to being a perennial US merger target. A focus on improving its profitability has paid huge dividends, with Ashurst making up ground on the Magic Circle and establishing clear blue water between itself and rivals in its immediate peer group. Average profits now stand at £701,000, up 24% from last year. Encouragingly, the firm has seen revenues rise by 28% at the half-year mark of the current financial year, which is expected to translate into another significant profits increase for 2006/07. Ashurst has been extremely active in the laterals market, taking 15 partners internationally. In December, the firm announced that it was set to launch in Stockholm with (L-R) James Baxter and Vanessa Pawsey of Legal Business, Simon Bromwich and the takeover of three-partner AJB Bergh, a move driven by the Geoffrey Green of Ashurst, with Richard Meddelton of The Royal Bank of Scotland HIGHLY COMMENDED has quietly re-established its position as a leading BURGES SALMON UK law firm with a reinvigorated City office. -
Lex 100 P014-024 Winners.Qxp 17/08/2007 15:08 Page 14
Lex 100 p014-024 Winners.qxp 17/08/2007 15:08 Page 14 Job satisfaction How would you rate your overall job satisfaction? Lex 100 winners 1 Farrer & Co 9.10 2 Harbottle & Lewis LLP 9.00 Analysis = McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP 9.00 This important category is topped this year by Farrer & Co in what’s = Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP 9.00 been a highly impressive overall performance – the firm appears in every single one of our Lex 100 5 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 8.75 Winners tables, often near the top, the first firm to do so. So why is this 6 Covington & Burling LLP 8.71 mid-sized London firm so popular with trainees? It certainly sounds a fun place 7 Latham & Watkins 8.67 to work and offers six seats in a wide variety of practice areas. There’s a strong 8 Ashfords 8.63 bond between current trainees, who praise the ‘great people and great mix of work’, ‘unique atmosphere’ and ‘sheer breadth of training = Stephens & Scown 8.63 opportunities’. Media boutique Harbottle & Lewis comes next. Trainees here feel they have ‘considerably 10 Bristows 8.60 better quality work than peers, better experience and more exposure’. Then, as last year, there’s a strong showing = Shoosmiths 8.60 by five US firms: McDermott Will & Emery, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Cleary Gottlieb, Covington & 12 Browne Jacobson LLP 8.58 Burling and Latham & Watkins. These firms have not been offering training contracts for that long in London and all have 13 Birketts 8.50 limited intakes. -
Top Law Firms 2019 Top Law Firms 2019
Top Law Firms 2019 Top Law Firms 2019 In association with Sanlam Private Wealth In the hands of a wealthsmith, a humdrum retirement could turn into something more adventurous At Sanlam we understand the importance of ensuring each client’s pension reaches its maximum potential, providing them with the best foundations to enjoy their next chapter. To find out more please call Penny Lovell on 020 7382 0946, email [email protected] or visit www.sanlam.co.uk Advice • Planning • Management Winner Investment Performance High Growth Portfolios 2018 and 2019 The value of investments and the income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Sanlam Wealth is a trading name of Sanlam Private Investments (UK) Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No.2041819. Registered Office: 16 South Park, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 1AN. Sanlam Wealth Planning UK Limited, registered in England and Wales 3879955, and English Mutual Limited, registered in England and Wales 6685913 (Registered Offices: St Bartholomew’s House, Lewin’s Mead, Bristol BS1 2NH). English Mutual Limited is an appointed representative of Sanlam Wealth Planning UK Limited. Top Law Firms Foreword Will Sidery elcome to the 2019 eprivateclient Top Law Firms report that recognises the leading private client editor eprivateclient W law firms in the UK. This year 43 firms have been included in the rankings and these firms reflect the wide variety of advice available to clients from not just the UK but international individuals and families too. -
Careers at the Chancery Bar
Careers at the Chancery Bar With the right qualifications, where you come from doesn’t matter, where you’re going does. “if you are looking for a career which combines intellectual firepower, communication skills and the ability to provide practical solutions to legal problems, then your natural home is the Chancery Bar” 2 Chancery Bar Association Chancery Bar Association 1 Welcome to the Chancery Bar Do you enjoy unravelling the knottiest of legal problems? Would you relish the prospect of your appearances in court helping to develop cutting-edge areas of law? How does advising major commercial concerns to put together a complex transaction appeal? Would you like to assist organisations to achieve their commercial goals, and support and guide individuals at times of great personal stress? If your answer to any of these questions is “Yes”, then the Chancery Bar may be the career for you. Barristers who specialise in the areas of property, business and finance law most closely associated with the Chancery Division of the High Court are called “Chancery barristers” and, collectively, the “Chancery Bar”. Of the 15,000 barristers practising in England and Wales, about 1,200 specialise in Chancery work. Most are based in London but there are other important regional centres, such as Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds and Manchester. In recent years the nature of Chancery work has changed dramatically. It still includes the important work traditionally undertaken in the Chancery Division, but the expansion and development of commercial activity, together with the increasingly complex matters that arise out of that activity, have widened its scope significantly. -
The Test of Remoteness. at First Sight Wellesley Partners LLP V Withers
TWO IMPORTANT CASES WELLESLEY PARTNERS LLP – the test of remoteness. At first sight Wellesley Partners LLP v Withers LLP [2015] EWCA Civ 1146 is “just another slightly dreary solicitors’ negligence case where attributing fault and assessing damages depended on a combination of close fact-specific analysis and a certain amount of educated guesswork”. The words are not mine, they are those of Professor Tettenborn. However, the learned Professor considers that the case gave rise to two interesting points of law, which it did. It is those I wish to look at briefly. As we all know in very many cases the live issues in professional negligence claims are as much involved with causation and damage as they are with breach of duty and this was a case which resolves important issues which have the potential to impact on a number of claims in the area. The facts of Wellesley can be set out very briefly. Wellesley was a successful firm of head-hunters or as they preferred “executive placement consultants”. It was based in London albeit that one of the founding partners had spun off a business in Hong Kong. In order to facilitate growth it wished to expand the membership of the LLP. One of the new members was to be a middle eastern based bank: ADDAX. The defendant solicitors were engaged to amend the LLP agreement but in doing so, as the trial judge 1 held, mis-drafted the same so that ADDAX could withdraw its money prematurely which, following the Lehman Brothers collapse, it duly did. One of the largest elements of alleged loss related to an allegation that the business had been deprived of the opportunity to open a New York office and to obtain a contract with Nomura which was reconstructing the Lehman Brother business of which it had purchased part. -
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY LEAGUE TABLES PROJECT FINANCE & M&A 2017 Project Finance – Lead Arrangers
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY LEAGUE TABLES PROJECT FINANCE & M&A 2017 www.cleanenergypipeline.com Project Finance – Lead Arrangers Top 20 Lead Arrangers by Number of Deals Rank Lead Arranger Number of Deals Deal Credit ($ million) 1 Triodos 68 698 2 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi-UFJ 58 3,709 3 HSH Nordbank 37 1,220 4 Nord/LB 35 1,759 5 EBRD 29 1,641 6 KfW 25 2,608 7 SMBC 25 1,721 8 Société Générale 24 1,281 9 EIB 22 1,694 10 Santander 15 604 11 Rabobank 11 710 12 Credit Agricole 11 626 13 BNP Paribas 10 642 14 ING Capital 9 562 15 Natixis 9 557 16 Mizuho 8 697 17 Asian Development Bank 7 519 18 FMO 7 194 19 Unicredit 6 282 20 Japan Bank for International Cooperation 5 492 2 Project Finance – Lead Arrangers Top 20 Lead Arrangers by Deal Credit Rank Lead Arranger Number of Deals Deal Credit ($ million) 1 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi-UFJ 58 3,709 2 KfW 25 2,608 3 Nord/LB 35 1,759 4 SMBC 25 1,721 5 EIB 22 1,694 6 EBRD 29 1,641 7 Société Générale 24 1,281 8 HSH Nordbank 37 1,220 9 Rabobank 11 710 10 Triodos 68 698 11 Mizuho 8 697 12 BNP Paribas 10 642 13 Credit Agricole 11 626 14 Santander 15 604 15 ING Capital 9 562 16 Natixis 9 557 17 Asian Development Bank 7 519 18 Japan Bank for International Cooperation 5 492 19 ABN AMRO 5 410 20 Investec 5 336 3 Project Finance – Legal Advisers Top 20 Legal Advisers by Number of Deals Rank Legal Adviser Number of Deals Deal Credit ($ million) 1 Norton Rose Fulbright 60 11,715 2 Bird & Bird 31 nd 3 Clifford Chance 30 6,483 4 Watson Farley & Williams 23 4,902 5 Allen & Overy 23 5,764 6 DLA Piper 22 2,918 7 Linklaters 20 -
Contentious Commentary
Contentioius Commentary 1 Newsletter December 2015 Contentious Commentary Contract money, the obligation to pay the On the penalty spot specified sum is a secondary obligation which is capable of being Contents The rule on penalty clauses is alive! a penalty; but if the contract does English contract law generally adopts The rule on penalty clauses is not impose (expressly or impliedly) a laissez faire approach – the parties restricted but left in place an obligation to perform the act, but can usually do what they want (at simply provides that, if one party Tolling agreement extends to least, unless consumers are involved). does not perform, he will pay the fraud despite lack of mention The rule on penalty clauses is one of other party a specified sum, the Waiver of immunity for assets the few common law rules that obligation to pay the specified sum allows an injunction controls what the parties can agree. is a conditional primary obligation Terms will rarely be implied It bans an agreement requiring a and cannot be a penalty." into contracts party in breach of contract to pay a Contractual remoteness sum out of all proportion to the losses The rule can therefore be evaded by applies to tort claim caused by the breach in order to deter appropriate drafting in some – breach. Because of the rule's perhaps many – cases (though the Securitisation vehicle can sue exceptional nature, it has always court will look to the substance rather valuers been controversial. than the form). Legal context is wide for privilege purposes In Cavendish Square Holding BV v When the rule applies, the test is no Potential waiver of privilege Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67, the longer about reasonable pre- can be undone Supreme Court was offered the option estimates of damages or whether a of abolishing the rule altogether or, clause is a deterrent to breach. -
Autumn 2017 Budget: Period Drama Or Zombie Apocalypse?, Practical Law UK Articles
Autumn 2017 Budget: period drama or zombie apocalypse?, Practical Law UK Articles... Autumn 2017 Budget: period drama or zombie apocalypse? by Practical Law Tax Articles | Published on 24-Nov-2017 | UK, United Kingdom Leading tax experts gave us their views on the Autumn 2017 Budget. (Free access.) We asked leading tax practitioners for their views on the Autumn 2017 Budget. An overview of their comments is set out below; click on a name to read the comment in full. For the main measures of interest to businesses, see Legal update, Autumn 2017 Budget: key business tax announcements. For coverage of the implications of the Autumn 2017 Budget for a range of practice areas and sectors, see Practical Law, Autumn 2017 Budget. Setting the scene Despite an almost effervescent political delivery by "Spreadsheet Phil" (complete with comedic props from his co-star diva, Mrs May), the Autumn 2017 Budget was, barring one or two eye-raising exceptions, not edge of the seat viewing. Simon Skinner, Travers Smith LLP "was left with an impression of lots of words but not that much substance". Geraint Jones, Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP described it as "a rather timid affair" As ever, context is all. This was a minority government on the eve of the biggest destabilising global political event in recent history. And an opposition party biting at its heels with unanticipated vigour. Further, despite Fiscal Phil's audition for the lead role in a comedy caper, the figures belong in a disaster movie. There is surely only so much film star glamour to be mustered whilst uttering the words "[a]nd regrettably our productivity performance continues to disappoint".