2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management

April, 2012

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Local Authority Lisa Croft Officer

Department Pollution Control PO Box 257, Pollution Control, The Address Council House, College Road, Doncaster, DN1 1RN Telephone 01302 737579 e-mail [email protected]

Report Reference USA2012 number Date 30 th April 2012

LAQM USA 2012 1 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Executive Summary

The Updating and Screening Assessment confirms that the 5 Air Quality Management Areas (AQMA’s) in the Borough of Doncaster are valid and that the boundaries adequately describe the area of exceedence of the nitrogen dioxide annual mean objective.

There have been no new or significantly changed sources identified which are likely to give rise to further exceedences of any of the pollutants assessed under Local Air Quality Management.

The air quality across most of the Borough remains within the objective levels and monitoring will continue where necessary.

There are still significant road sources in the Borough and further investigations, where a Detailed Assessment will be conducted, are required for the areas of Skellow, close to the A1and Hickleton on the A635.

Screening has yet to be completed for a new biomass installation and the results will be reported in 2013 either in the Progress Report or directly in a Detailed Assessment should screening indicate this is necessary.

LAQM USA 2012 2 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Table of contents

1 Introduction ...... 6 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area ...... 6 1.2 Purpose of Report...... 6 1.3 Air Quality Objectives ...... 7 1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments...... 9 2 New Monitoring Data ...... 12 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken...... 12 2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites ...... 12 2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites ...... 15 2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with AQ Objectives...... 22 2.2.1 Nitrogen Dioxide ...... 22

2.2.2 PM 10 ...... 47 2.2.3 Sulphur Dioxide...... 50 2.2.4 Benzene...... 50 2.2.5 Other pollutants monitored ...... 50 2.2.6 Summary of Compliance with AQS Objectives ...... 51 3 Road Traffic Sources ...... 52 3.1 Narrow Congested Streets with Residential Properties Close to the Kerb ...... 52 3.2 Busy Streets Where People May Spend 1-hour or More Close to Traffic...... 52 3.3 Roads with a High Flow of Buses and/or HDVs...... 52 3.4 Junctions...... 52 3.5 New Roads Constructed or Proposed Since the Last Round of Review and Assessment 52 3.6 Roads with Significantly Changed Traffic Flows...... 53 3.7 Bus and Coach Stations ...... 53 4 Other Transport Sources...... 54 4.1 Airports...... 54 4.2 Railways (Diesel and Steam Trains) ...... 54 4.2.1 Stationary Trains...... 54 4.2.2 Moving Trains ...... 55 4.3 Ports (Shipping) ...... 55 5 Industrial Sources...... 56 5.1 Industrial Installations ...... 56 5.1.1 New or Proposed Installations for which an Air Quality Assessment has been Carried Out 56 5.1.2 Existing Installations where Emissions have Increased Substantially or New Relevant Exposure has been Introduced ...... 56 5.1.3 New or Significantly Changed Installations with No Previous Air Quality Assessment... 57

LAQM USA 2012 3 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

5.2 Major Fuel (Petrol) Storage Depots...... 57 5.3 Petrol Stations...... 57 5.4 Poultry Farms...... 57 6 Commercial and Domestic Sources ...... 58 6.1 Biomass Combustion – Individual Installations ...... 58 6.2 Biomass Combustion – Combined Impacts...... 58 6.3 Domestic Solid-Fuel Burning ...... 58 7 Fugitive or Uncontrolled Sources...... 60 8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions...... 61 8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data ...... 61 8.2 Conclusions from Assessment of Sources ...... 61 8.3 Proposed Actions...... 61 9 References...... 63

List of Tables Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England Table 1.2 Review and Assessment Reports for Doncaster MBC for the purpose of Local Air Quality Management in England. Table 2.1 Details of Automatic Monitoring Sites Table 2.2 Details of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites Table 2.3 Results of Automatic Monitoring of Nitrogen Dioxide: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Table 2.4 Results of Automatic Monitoring for Nitrogen Dioxide: Comparison with 1-hour mean Objective Table 2.5 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes in 2011 Table 2.6 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes (2007 to 2011)

Table 2.7 Results of Automatic Monitoring of PM 10 : Comparison with Annual Mean Objective

Table 2.8 Results of Automatic Monitoring for PM 10 : Comparison with 24-hour mean Objective

List of Figures Figure 1.1 Map of AQMA Boundaries Figure 2.1 Map of Automatic Monitoring Sites Figure 2.2 Map of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites Figure 2.3 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Automatic Monitoring Concentrations Figure 2.4 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA1 Figure 2.5 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA2

LAQM USA 2012 4 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Figure 2.6 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA3 Figure 2.6 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA4 Figure 2.8 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – Long-term monitoring outside of AQMA’s

Appendices Appendix A QA/QC of data Appendix B Maps of Locations of AQMAs, Automatic Monitors and Diffusion Tubes. Appendix C Raw Diffusion Tube Data Appendix D Radiation Graphs

LAQM USA 2012 5 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

1 Introduction 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area

The Borough of Doncaster is bounded to the west and north by densely urbanised communities, which formed the industrial heartland of the old West Riding. Although many of the traditional industries found in this area (e.g. coal mining and steel production) have declined dramatically over recent years there are still a number of Part A and B processes present within the Borough and neighbouring authorities which can be considered as potentially significant sources of the relevant pollutants.

The area to the east and south of the Borough is much less industrialised and densely populated with less potential for the air quality of the Borough to be affected by industrial sources in this area. The Trent Valley power stations complex has in the past been implicated in short term pollution episodes, as have the power stations located to the north and northeast.

The A1(M) and M18 motorways run through the Borough and the area also has important rail links.

The population, as of the 2001 census, stands at 286,866 residents.

1.2 Purpose of Report

This report fulfils the requirements of the Local Air Quality Management process as set out in Part IV of the Environment Act (1995), the Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2007 and the relevant Policy and Technical Guidance documents. The LAQM process places an obligation on all local authorities to regularly review and assess air quality in their areas, and to determine whether or not the air quality objectives are likely to be achieved. Where exceedences are considered likely, the local authority must then declare an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) and prepare an Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) setting out the measures it intends to put in place in pursuit of the objectives.

The objective of this Updating and Screening Assessment is to identify any matters that have changed which may lead to risk of an air quality objective being exceeded.

LAQM USA 2012 6 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

A checklist approach and screening tools are used to identify significant new sources or changes and whether there is a need for a Detailed Assessment. The USA report should provide an update of any outstanding information requested previously in Review and Assessment reports.

1.3 Air Quality Objectives

The air quality objectives applicable to LAQM in England are set out in the Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 (SI 928), The Air Quality (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 3043), and are shown in Table 1.1. This table shows the objectives in units of microgrammes per cubic metre µg/m3 (milligrammes per cubic metre, mg /m3 for carbon monoxide) with the number of exceedences in each year that are permitted (where applicable).

Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England Air Quality Objective Date to be Pollutant Concentration Measured as achieved by Running annual 16.25 µg/m 3 31.12.2003 mean Benzene Running annual 5.00 µg/m 3 31.12.2010 mean Running annual 1,3-Butadiene 2.25 µg/m 3 31.12.2003 mean Running 8-hour Carbon monoxide 10.0 mg/m 3 31.12.2003 mean 0.5 µg/m 3 Annual mean 31.12.2004 Lead 0.25 µg/m 3 Annual mean 31.12.2008 200 µg/m 3 not to be exceeded more 1-hour mean 31.12.2005 Nitrogen dioxide than 18 times a year 40 µg/m 3 Annual mean 31.12.2005 50 µg/m 3, not to be exceeded more 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 Particles (PM 10 ) than 35 times a (gravimetric) year 40 µg/m 3 Annual mean 31.12.2004

Sulphur dioxide 350 µg/m 3, not to 1-hour mean 31.12.2004 be exceeded more

LAQM USA 2012 7 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

than 24 times a year 125 µg/m 3, not to be exceeded more 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 than 3 times a year 266 µg/m 3, not to be exceeded more 15-minute mean 31.12.2005 than 35 times a year

LAQM USA 2012 8 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments

Previous rounds of review and assessment have indicated that for carbon monoxide, benzene, 1,3, butadiene, lead and sulphur dioxide there is little risk of exceedence of the objectives.

The pollutants that have been of main concern are particulate matter (PM 10 ) and nitrogen dioxide as found in many other areas of the UK.

The Stage 3 assessment concluded that the nitrogen dioxide annual mean objective would be exceeded in several locations in the Borough. Modelling and monitoring has since confirmed this conclusion and in 2001 three Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) were declared followed by a fourth in 2003.

An Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) was published in 2003 covering all four AQMAs.

A Detailed Assessment produced in 2010 concluded that further monitoring was required before declaration should be made for a fifth AQMA in the Borough. Following additional monitoring the 2011 Progress Report confirmed that a fifth AQMA was required. AQMA 5 was declared in April 2012.

A Detailed Assessment is currently being undertaken for exceedences of nitrogen dioxide at the A1 in Skellow.

The table below details each stage of review and assessment conducted.

Table 1.2 Review and Assessment Reports for Doncaster MBC for the purpose of Local Air Quality Management in England.

Report Name/Stage Date Produced Outcome Stage 1 1998/9 Recommended Stage 2 for all pollutants. Stage 2 2000 Third Stage review required for nitrogen dioxide and PM10. Stage 3 2001 Concluded that the objective for

LAQM USA 2012 9 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

nitrogen dioxide (annual mean) was not likely to be met in three areas. Declaration followed. Stage 4 2002 Confirmed that the objective was exceeded in the 3 AQMAs and that a further AQMA declaration needed to be made. Stage 4 (AQMA4) 2004 Confirmed the status of AQMA4. Updating and Screening April 2003 AQMA declaration supported. Assessment No further likely exceedences found. Progress Report April 2004 AQMA declaration supported. No further likely exceedences found. Progress Report April 2005 AQMA declarations remained valid. No further likely exceedences found. Updating and Screening April 2006 AQMA declarations remained Assessment valid. No further likely exceedences found. Progress Report April 2007 AQMA declarations remained valid. No further likely exceedences found. Progress Report April 2008 AQMA declarations remained valid. No further likely exceedences found. Updating and Screening April 2009 AQMA declarations remained Assessment valid. Detailed Assessment required for nitrogen dioxide. Progress Report April 2010 AQMA declarations remained valid. No further exceedences found. Detailed Assessment May 2010 AQMA still being investigated in terms of extent for nitrogen dioxide. Waiting for further year’s data to decide on boundary. Comments not yet received from Defra. Progress Report April 2011 AQMA declarations remained valid. Monitoring data confirmed that an AQMA declaration is required. Detailed Assessment required for nitrogen dioxide in Conisbrough.

LAQM USA 2012 10 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 1.1 Map of AQMA Boundaries

LAQM USA 2012 11 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 2 New Monitoring Data 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken

2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites

Doncaster Council currently operates 6 automatic monitoring units in the borough in addition to non-automatic monitoring. All of the locations are now effectively permanent and all are located within AQMAs. Figure 2.1 provides the locations of the monitoring units.

Unit 10 began operation in May 2011 and is located in the newly declared AQMA5.

All PM 10 monitoring within the report is measured using Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalances (TEOMs), all data presented has been corrected using Kings College Volatile Correction Model (VCM).

Details of the QA/QC procedure and further location maps are provided in the Appendices

Details of the monitoring sites operated by Doncaster Council are listed in Table 2.1.

LAQM USA 2012 12 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.1 Map of Automatic Monitoring Sites

Unit 3

Unit 1

Unit 9

Unit 4

Unit 6

Unit 10

LAQM USA 2012 13 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.1 Details of Automatic Monitoring Sites Relevant Distance to Does this Exposure? (Y/N kerb of location with distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Y OS Pollutants Monitoring to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type GridRef Grid Ref Monitored In AQMA? Technique exposure) applicable) exposure? Chemiluminescent Unit 1 A18 Carr House NO Roadside 458027 402475 2 Y Analyser Y (4) 1.7m N Road PM 10 TEOM Chemiluminescent Urban NO Unit 3 Market Place 457669 403611 2 Y Analyser Y (30.7m) 20m N centre PM 10 TEOM Unit 4 A1/A630 Chemiluminescent Roadside 454964 400745 NO Y Y (15.7m) 7.3m N Grosvenor Terrace 2 Analyser Unit 6 A638 Bawtry Chemiluminescent Roadside 462278 400111 NO Y Y (20m) 2.2m N Road 2 Analyser Unit 9 A630 Balby Chemiluminescent Roadside 456333 401412 NO Y Y (21m) 7.8m N Library 2 Analyser Chemiluminescent Unit 10 A6023 Low NO Roadside 451438 398528 2 Y Analyser Y (17) 2.95m Y Road, Conisbrough PM 10 TEOM

LAQM USA 2012 14 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

Doncaster Council has 86 nitrogen dioxide diffusion tubes spread across the borough. Tubes have been placed across Doncaster with regard to monitoring existing AQMAs, identifying potential hotspots based on local knowledge, monitoring main routes into the town centre and also with consideration to areas where future development may have significant impacts. Community and school monitoring projects are conducted on a yearly basis, however this data is of limited value for the purpose of review and assessment as the level of QA/QC cannot be guaranteed. However, should this data indicate potential for exceedences further investigation would take place.

Details of the QA/QC procedure is provided in Appendix A

A general overview of the diffusion tube network is provided in Figure 2.2 with more detailed maps provided in Appendix B

LAQM USA 2012 15

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.2 Map of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

LAQM USA 2012 16

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.2 Details of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites Is monitoring Relevant collocated Exposure? Distance to Does this with a (Y/N with kerb of location Continuous distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants Analyser to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type Ref Ref Monitored In AQMA? (Y/N) exposure) applicable) exposure? North Bridge Kerbside 456946 403763 NO N N N 0.8 N (North) 2 North Bridge Roadside 457308 403458 NO Y N N 9.2 Y (South) 2 Regent Sq. Kerbside 457952 403123 NO 2 N N Y (1) 0.5 Y South Roadside 457975 403134 NO N N N 2 Y Parade 2 Bennethorpe Kerbside 459113 402842 NO Y N N 0.5 Y Road 2 Carr House Roadside 459533 402768 NO N N N 6.8 N Road 2 Sheep bridge Kerbside 462899 399328 NO N N N 1 N Lane 2 Hayfield Roadside 463023 399428 NO N N N 2.3 N Lane 2 Hurst Lane Kerbside 463888 398416 NO 2 N N N 0.8 N Hayfield Lane/Hurst Kerbside 464879 399699 NO 2 N N N 0.7 Y Lane Gattison Roadside 461334 397977 NO N N Y (13.3) 2.3 N Lane 2 West End Roadside 461164 398459 NO N N Y (23.8) 2 N Lane 2 Bawtry Road Roadside 462242 400134 NO 2 Y N N 3.5 Y Stoops Lane Roadside 461362 400777 NO 2 N N Y (14) 3.2 Y Dunniwood Roadside 461875 400396 NO N N Y (9.5) 1.5 2 N Avenue

LAQM USA 2012 17

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Is monitoring Relevant collocated Exposure? Distance to Does this with a (Y/N with kerb of location Continuous distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants Analyser to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type Ref Ref Monitored In AQMA? (Y/N) exposure) applicable) exposure? Burnham Roadside 460703 400559 NO N N Y (10.8) 1.2 2 N Close Lindrick Roadside 459947 401538 NO N N Y (7.5) 3 2 N Close Cantley Lane Roadside 460342 402108 NO 2 N N Y (12.5) 1.2 Y Gliwice Way Roadside 459745 402638 NO 2 N N N 3.3 Y (Dome) Gliwice Way Roadside 459721 402650 NO 2 N N N 2.3 Y (Town) Hall Flat Roadside 456164 401227 NO 2 Y N Y (6) 1.5 Y Junction Warde Roadside 455679 401000 NO 2 Y N Y (10.7) 2.5 Y Avenue Norbreck Kerbside 454194 400257 NO 2 N N Y (8.5) 0.8 N Road Low Road Kerbside 451457 398659 NO 2 N N Y (1.2) 1 Y Clifton Hill Roadside 451419 398540 NO 2 N N Y (2.7) 2.2 Y Junction Mill Lane Roadside 454310 400460 NO 2 N N Y (8) 3.5 Y Waverley Roadside 455635 401002 NO 2 Y N N 1.5 Y Avenue High Road Roadside 456130 401258 NO 2 Y N N 2.5 Y Belmont Roadside 457010 402056 NO 2 Y N Y (1) 1.5 Y Avenue Mansfield Roadside 457022 402141 NO 2 Y N Y (0.3) 3.7 Y Road Airport – Roadside 464986 399697 NO 2 N N Y (0) 8.7 N Hayfield Lane Airport – Roadside 465719 400140 NO 2 N N Y (9.3) 6 N Gate House

LAQM USA 2012 18

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Is monitoring Relevant collocated Exposure? Distance to Does this with a (Y/N with kerb of location Continuous distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants Analyser to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type Ref Ref Monitored In AQMA? (Y/N) exposure) applicable) exposure? Lane Airport – Roadside 466895 400405 NO 2 N N Y (0) 11.3 N Mosham Road Airport – Roadside 467174 400372 NO 2 N N Y (0) 5.5 N Rose Cottage Airport – Background 468629 404336 NO 2 N N N N/A N Hatfield 404336 Moors Airport – Roadside 467755 408643 NO 2 N N N 2.3 N Hatfield 408643 Woodhouse Airport - Background 469056 407623 NO 2 N N N N/A N Hollinbridge 407623 Lane Clark Avenue Roadside 458328 402605 NO 2 Y N Y (7.7) 1.7 Y Market Place Roadside 457615 403630 NO 2 Y N N 6.3 Y Church Way Roadside 457379 403460 NO 2 Y N Y (4) 4 Y Stainforth Urban 464046 411818 NO 2 N N N 9.3 N background KS Sandall Roadside 461330 407823 NO 2 N N Y (21.8) 1.5 Y Lane KS Horton Suburban 461204 408140 NO 2 N N Y (0) 6.5 N View Warning Roadside 462712 401120 NO 2 Y N N 2.2 Y Tongue Lane Howden Roadside 452219 410224 NO 2 N N Y (0) 7 N Avenue, Skellow Hill Crest, Kerbside 452195 410302 NO 2 N N Y (0.3) 7.6 Y

LAQM USA 2012 19

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Is monitoring Relevant collocated Exposure? Distance to Does this with a (Y/N with kerb of location Continuous distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants Analyser to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type Ref Ref Monitored In AQMA? (Y/N) exposure) applicable) exposure? Skellow Five Lane Roadside 452180 410377 NO 2 N N Y(6.65) 9.35 Y Ends, A1, Skellow Skellow – Roadside 452180 410402 NO 2 N N Y(15) 1 N Crabgate Lane Skellow – Roadside 452192 410389 NO 2 N N Y(12) 1.8 N Hampole Balk Hickleton – Kerbside 448221 405303 NO 2 N N Y(3) 1 Y Sue Ryder Care Home Hickleton – Kerbside 448132 405302 NO 2 N N Y(3) 1.8 N Opp. Castle Hill Fold Hickleton – Kerbside 448054 405319 NO 2 N N Y(0.3) 0.8 Y Opp. Fir Tree Close Hickleton – Kerbside 448218 405320 NO 2 N N Y(0.3) 0.8 Y John O’Gaunts Hatfield Post Kerbside 466295 409504 NO 2 N N Y (0.3) 1.5 Y Office Doncaster Roadside 465011 408216 NO 2 N N Y(12) 0.4 Y Road, Dunscroft Thorne – Roadside 468543 413458 NO 2 N N Y(3) 2.5 N Fieldside Thorne – Roadside 468749 413300 NO 2 N N N(0.5) 2 Y King Street

LAQM USA 2012 20

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Is monitoring Relevant collocated Exposure? Distance to Does this with a (Y/N with kerb of location Continuous distance (m) nearest road represent X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants Analyser to relevant (N/A if not worst-case Site Name Site Type Ref Ref Monitored In AQMA? (Y/N) exposure) applicable) exposure? Thorne – Kerbside 468864 413108 NO 2 N N Y(0.5) 1 Y South Parade Barnby Dun Roadside 461358 409511 NO 2 N N Y(2.7) 1.1 Y High Street, Roadside 456623 405744 NO 2 N N Y(0.3) 2 Y Bentley Willow Roadside 451446 398582 NO 2 Y N N 2.1 Y Street, Conisbrough Doncaster Roadside 451485 398514 NO 2 Y N Y(2) 2 Y Road, Conisbrough Sheffield Roadside 451425 398449 NO 2 Y N N 3 Y Road, Conisbrough Low Road Kerbside 451426 398493 NO 2 Y N Y(20) 1.5 Y Junction, Conisbrough 3 Low Road, Kerbside 451424 398555 NO 2 Y N Y(0) 1.08 Y Conisbrough 27 Low Kerbside 451453 398632 NO 2 Y N Y(0) 1.88 Y Road, Conisbrough 32/34 Low Roadside 451440 398652 NO 2 Y N Y(0.3) 1.78 Y Road, Conisbrough Mason Arms, Roadside 448047 399880 NO 2 N N Y(3) 4 Y Mexborough Doncaster Roadside 448004 399862 NO 2 N N N 2 Y Road, Mexbrough

LAQM USA 2012 21

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with AQ Objectives

2.2.1 Nitrogen Dioxide

Automatic Monitoring Data

The automatic monitoring sites are all within Doncaster’s AQMAs therefore any exceedences are within designated boundaries. Unit 4 has continuously exceeded since monitoring began and two units have recorded no exceedences during the same period (Unit6 and Unit9).

Unit 3 has exceeded for the first time in 2011, however this data is viewed with some caution as there have been some QA/QC issues at this site. Factors produced from the local operator site calibrations were not valid and therefore a blanket factor produced from the services was used instead.

Unit1, located in AQMA3, shows a dramatic increase in nitrogen dioxide levels however data capture is low and may contribute to this result.

Unit 10 is located within the new AQMA5 and although does not show an exceedence the monitoring does not cover a full year (started June 2011). The annualised result shown in the table is very close to exceedence, the method used is shown in Appendix A.

LAQM USA 2012 22

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.3 Results of Automatic Monitoring of Nitrogen Dioxide: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Valid Data Capture Valid Data 3 Within Annual Mean Concentration µµµg/m Site ID Site Type for period of Capture c c c c c AQMA? a b 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011 monitoring % 2011 % Unit 1 A18 Carr House Roadside Y n/a 73 43.7 52.7 34.0 Road Unit 3 Urban Y n/a 98 34.5 33.4 30.0 32.5 44.0 Market Place centre Unit 4 A1/A630 Roadside Y n/a 97 47.8 42.2 41.3 43.0 40.5 Grosvenor Terrace Unit 6 A638 Bawtry Roadside Y n/a 85 34.6 31.1 32.3 36.8 Road Unit 9 Roadside Y n/a 96 35.3 35.7 33.4 33.2 A630 Balby Road Unit 10 A6023 Low Roadside Y 86 51 39.6 Road, Conisbrough a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year. b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%.) c Means should be “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09), if monitoring was not carried out for the full year. *Annual mean concentrations for previous years are optional.

LAQM USA 2012 23

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.3 shows data for the automatic monitoring since 2007, there is no clear trend across the sites. Units 4 and 9 are located in AQMA2 and appear to be declining steadily, while other sites in 2011 appear to be more erratic. In each case monitoring will continue and future monitoring may serve to highlight any spurious results in single years.

LAQM USA 2012 24

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.3 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measures at Automatic Monitoring Sites

Figure 2.3 Automatic monitoring nitrogen dioxide trends

Unit 1 Unit 3 Unit 4 30 Unit 6 Unit 9 Unit 10 20 NO2 in microgrammes per cubic NO2 microgrammesper in metre

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 25

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

The hourly objective in the area of Doncaster is not likely to be exceeded. Across the monitoring units, only one exceedence has been recorded.

LAQM USA 2012 26

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Table 2.4 Results of Automatic Monitoring for Nitrogen Dioxide: Comparison with 1-hour mean Objective Valid Data Number of Exceedences of Hourly Mean (200 µµµg/m 3) Capture for Valid Data Within period of Capture 2011 Site ID Site Type AQMA? monitoring % a % b 2008* c 2009* c 2010* c 2011 c Unit 1 A18 Carr Roadside Y n/a 73 0 (51.1) 0 1(104.2) House Road Unit 3 Urban Y n/a 98 0 (129.7) 0 (46.0) 0 0 Market Place centre Unit 4 A1/A630 Roadside Y n/a 97 0 0 0 0 Grosvenor Terrace Unit 6 A638 Bawtry Roadside Y n/a 85 0 0 0(117.8) 0(102.2) Road Unit 9 A630 Balby Roadside Y n/a 96 0 0 0 0 Road Unit 10 A6023 Low Roadside Y 86 51 0(77.5) Road, Conisbrough a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year. b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%.) c If the period of valid data is less than 90%, include the 99.8 th percentile of hourly means in brackets *Number of exceedences for previous years are optional.

LAQM USA 2012 27

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Diffusion Tube Monitoring Data

Diffusion tube results in 2011 are generally lower than those of previous years, the national bias adjustment factor being the cause however it has been used here for consistency with previous reports.

The national bias adjustment factor for 2011 was 0.79 (national factor correct on 04/04/12). However, considering this factor is quite low, within Appendix C the raw diffusion tube data has been provided.

It was thought appropriate to compare the diffusion tube results with some local factors (Barnsley and Sheffield) in addition to the national factor. A table showing this comparison can be found in the appendix. Seventeen tubes were found to exceed using local factors but did not exceed when the national factor was applied. Almost all of these sites were within existing AQMA’s or were not considered as having relevant exposure. Tubes DMBC19 and DMBC26 are not within AQMA’s but exceeded when using the local factors. In both cases they are located in areas (Hickleton and Skellow respectively) where other sites continue to exceed and will be considered along with those sites.

Table 2.5 provides the 2011 nitrogen dioxide diffusion tube results, in summary any tubes that exceed the annual mean are either within AQMA’s or do not have relevant exposure. Sites 23 and 26 will cease in 2012 but have not exceeded since monitoring began in those locations. Site 28 has not been annualised despite having less than 9 months data. The data loss was spread across the year therefore it was not possible to obtain a period mean to complete the calculation.

The area of Skellow, monitored by tubes DMBC 15 – 17 and DMBC 25 and 26, is being further investigated with a detailed assessment due in 2012.

Sites DMBC 18-21 are located on the A635, Barnsley Road in Hickleton. Monitoring began in 2011 in partnership with the Parish Council. It was apparent relatively early in the survey that concentrations were well in excess of the annual mean objective,

LAQM USA 2012 28

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council so to confirm correct QA/QC was in place the Pollution Team took over placing out the diffusion tubes. Although there was some questions over several months QA/QC (all data has been included), the levels being recorded warrant further investigation and a detailed assessment will be required for both the annual mean and hourly objective.

LAQM USA 2012 29

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.5 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes in 2011 Data Data with Confirm if Annual mean Capture less than 9 data has concentration Triplicate 2011 months has been (Bias Adjustment or (Number been distance factor = 0.79) Within Collocated of Months annualised corrected Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? Tube or %) (Y/N) (Y/N) 2011 ( µµµg/m 3) 1 North Bridge Kerbside N N 11 N/A N 32 (North) 2 North Bridge Roadside Y N 12 N/A N 37 (South) 3 Regent Sq. Kerbside N N 10 N/A Y 29 (27) 4 South Parade Roadside N N 11 N/A N 42 5 Bennethorpe Road Kerbside Y N 12 N/A N 39 6 Carr House Road Roadside N N 10 N/A N 31 7 Sheep bridge Lane Kerbside N N 12 N/A N 29 8 Hayfield Lane Roadside N N 12 N/A N 24 9 Hurst Lane Kerbside N N 12 N/A N 24 10 Hayfield Kerbside N N 11 N/A N 20 Lane/Hurst Lane 11 Gattison Lane Roadside N N 11 N/A Y 20 (16) 12 West End Lane Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 23 (16) 13 Bawtry Road Roadside Y N 11 N/A N 40 14 Stoops Lane Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 39 (28) 15 Dunniwood Roadside N N 12 Y 21 (18) N/A Avenue 16 Burnham Close Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 21 (18) 17 Lindrick Close Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 21 (19) 18 Cantley Lane Roadside N N 11 N/A Y 26 (20) 19 Gliwice Way Roadside N N 12 N 40 N/A (Dome) 20 Gliwice Way Roadside N N 12 N 38 N/A (Town)

LAQM USA 2012 30

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Data Data with Confirm if Annual mean Capture less than 9 data has concentration Triplicate 2011 months has been (Bias Adjustment or (Number been distance factor = 0.79) Within Collocated of Months annualised corrected Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? Tube or %) (Y/N) (Y/N) 2011 ( µµµg/m 3) 21 Hall Flat Junction Roadside Y N 12 N/A Y 46 (36) 22 Warde Avenue Roadside Y N 12 N/A Y 45 (33) 23 Norbreck Road Kerbside N N 12 N/A Y 25 (23) 24 Low Road Kerbside N N 12 N/A Y 37 (33) 25 Clifton Hill Junction Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 36 (32) 26 Mill Lane Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 27 (25) 27 Waverley Avenue Roadside Y N 12 N/A N 34 28 High Road Roadside Y N 6 N N 40 29 Belmont Avenue Roadside Y N 12 N/A Y 37 (35) 30 Mansfield Road Roadside Y N 11 N/A Y 47 (46) DMBC1 Airport – Hayfield Roadside N N 12 N 15 N/A Lane DMBC2 Airport – Gate Roadside N N 12 Y 16 (14) N/A House Lane DMBC3 Airport – Mosham Roadside N N 12 N 16 N/A Road DMBC4 Airport – Rose Roadside N N 12 N 19 N/A Cottage DMBC5 Airport – Hatfield Background N N 12 N 12 N/A Moors DMBC6 Airport – Hatfield Roadside N N 12 N 21 N/A Woodhouse DMBC7 Airport - Background N N 12 N 12 N/A Hollinbridge Lane DMBC8 Clark Avenue Roadside Y N 11 N/A Y 36 (30) DMBC9 Market Place Roadside Y N 12 N/A N 33 DMBC10 Church Way Roadside Y N 12 N/A Y 38 (35) DMBC11 Stainforth Urban N N 12 N 17 N/A background DMBC13 KS Sandall Lane Roadside N N 11 N/A Y 23 (19) DMBC12 KS Horton View Suburban N N 12 N/A N 14

LAQM USA 2012 31

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Data Data with Confirm if Annual mean Capture less than 9 data has concentration Triplicate 2011 months has been (Bias Adjustment or (Number been distance factor = 0.79) Within Collocated of Months annualised corrected Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? Tube or %) (Y/N) (Y/N) 2011 ( µµµg/m 3) DMBC14 Warning Tongue Roadside Y N 12 N 36 N/A Lane DMBC15 Howden Avenue, Roadside N N 11 N 32 N/A Skellow DMBC16 Hill Crest, Skellow Kerbside N N 12 N/A Y 44 (44) DMBC17 Five Lane Ends, Roadside N N 11 Y 46 (40) N/A A1, Skellow DMBC25 Skellow – Roadside N N 12 Y 44 (28) N/A Crabgate Lane DMBC26 Skellow – Hampole Roadside N N 12 Y 36 (27) N/A Balk DMBC18 Hickleton – Sue Kerbside N N 12 Y 62 (48) N/A Ryder Care Home DMBC19 Hickleton – Opp. Kerbside N N 12 Y 38 (32) N/A Castle Hill Fold DMBC20 Hickleton – Opp. Kerbside N N 12 Y 68 (65) N/A Fir Tree Close DMBC21 Hickleton – John Kerbside N N 11 Y 71 (67) N/A O’Gaunts DMBC27 Hatfield Post Office Kerbside N N 11 N/A Y 31 (30) DMBC28 Doncaster Road, Roadside N N 10 Y 28(19) N/A Dunscroft DMBC29 Thorne – Fieldside Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 29 (26) DMBC30 Thorne – King Roadside N N 9 N 36 N/A Street DMBC31 Thorne – South Kerbside N N 12 Y 32 (31) N/A Parade DMBC35 Barnby Dun Roadside N N 12 N/A Y 21 (18) DMBC37 High Street, Roadside N N 11 Y 31 (31) N/A Bentley

LAQM USA 2012 32

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Data Data with Confirm if Annual mean Capture less than 9 data has concentration Triplicate 2011 months has been (Bias Adjustment or (Number been distance factor = 0.79) Within Collocated of Months annualised corrected Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? Tube or %) (Y/N) (Y/N) 2011 ( µµµg/m 3) DMBC39 Willow Street, Roadside Y N 12 N 35 N/A Conisbrough DMBC40 Doncaster Road, Roadside Y N 12 Y 41 (37) N/A Conisbrough DMBC41 Sheffield Road, Roadside Y N 12 N 31 N/A Conisbrough DMBC42 Low Road Kerbside Y N 12 N 30 Junction, N/A Conisbrough DMBC46 3 Low Road, Kerbside Y N 12 N 46 N/A Conisbrough DMBC47 27 Low Road, Kerbside Y N 12 N 38 N/A Conisbrough DMBC48 32/34 Low Road, Roadside Y N 12 Y 45 (44) N/A Conisbrough DMBC49 Mason Arms, Roadside N N 12 Y 32 (29) N/A Mexborough DMBC50 Doncaster Road, Roadside N N 11 N 41 N/A Mexbrough a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year. b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%.) c Means should be “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09), if monitoring was not carried out for the full year. *Annual mean concentrations for previous years are optional. NOTE: Values given in brackets are the distance adjusted concentrations for relevant exposure

LAQM USA 2012 33

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.6 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes (2007 to 2011) Annual mean concentration (adjusted for bias) µµµg/m 3 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011 Within (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Type AQMA? Factor = 0.84) Factor = 0.98) Factor = 0.91) Factor = 0.92) Factor = 0.79) 1 Kerbside N 33 38 35 38 32 2 Roadside Y 47 47 43 44 37 3 Kerbside N 34 37 36 34 29 4 Roadside N 44 51 51 49 42 5 Kerbside Y 41 47 47 47 39 6 Roadside N 34 36 35 32 31 7 Kerbside N 36 34 35 35 29 8 Roadside N 26 34 29 31 24 9 Kerbside N 30 29 29 29 24 10 Kerbside N 26 27 25 25 20 11 Roadside N 23 23 26 27 20 12 Roadside N 28 27 27 29 23 13 Roadside Y 44 49 50 49 40 14 Roadside N 24 34 51 44 39 15 Roadside N 23 24 23 28 21 16 Roadside N 25 27 28 30 21 17 Roadside N 26 27 26 26 21 18 Roadside N 30 31 31 34 26 19 Roadside N 40 48 47 47 40 20 Roadside N 38 45 44 43 38 21 Roadside Y 50 60 56 58 46 22 Roadside Y 50 56 53 56 45 23 Kerbside N 28 34 30 32 25 24 Kerbside N 36 43 41 46 37

LAQM USA 2012 34

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Annual mean concentration (adjusted for bias) µµµg/m 3 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011 Within (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Type AQMA? Factor = 0.84) Factor = 0.98) Factor = 0.91) Factor = 0.92) Factor = 0.79) 25 Roadside N 37 42 41 42 36 26 Roadside N 28 37 32 36 27 27 Roadside Y 34 42 41 41 34 28 Roadside Y 38 40 40 37 40 29 Roadside Y 41 45 42 47 37 30 Roadside Y 48 59 55 60 47 DMBC1 Roadside N 18 17 17 20 15 DMBC2 Roadside N 20 21 21 22 16 DMBC3 Roadside N 19 19 19 20 16 DMBC4 Roadside N 22 21 22 22 19 DMBC5 Background N 14 16 15 17 12 DMBC6 Roadside N 25 28 27 27 21 DMBC7 Background N 15 14 14 14 12 DMBC8 Roadside Y 44 47 46 48 36 DMBC9 Roadside Y 40 44 42 44 33 DMBC10 Roadside Y 44 48 49 50 38 DMBC11 Urban background N 20 22 21 22 17 DMBC13 Roadside N 27 30 27 27 23 DMBC12 Suburban N 16 16 16 15 14 DMBC14 Roadside Y 43 (3 months) 43 43 42 36 DMBC15 Roadside N 37 40 32 DMBC16 Kerbside N 58 (2 months) 53 44 DMBC17 Roadside N 59 (4 months) 60 46 DMBC25 Roadside N 44 DMBC26 Roadside N 36 DMBC18 Kerbside N 62 DMBC19 Kerbside N 38

LAQM USA 2012 35

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Annual mean concentration (adjusted for bias) µµµg/m 3 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011 Within (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Type AQMA? Factor = 0.84) Factor = 0.98) Factor = 0.91) Factor = 0.92) Factor = 0.79) DMBC20 Kerbside N 68 DMBC21 Kerbside N 71 DMBC27 Kerbside N 37 (4 months) 40 31 DMBC28 Roadside N 31 (4 months) 37 28 DMBC29 Roadside N 36 43 (2 months) 37 29 DMBC30 Roadside N 42 47 (2 months) 45 36 DMBC31 Kerbside N 41 45 (2 months) 37 32 DMBC35 Roadside N 31 (3 months) 26 21 DMBC37 Roadside N 46 (3 months) 40 31 DMBC39 Roadside Y 41 (4 months) 40 35 DMBC40 Roadside Y 37 (4 months) 47 41 DMBC41 Roadside Y 38 (4 months) 41 31 DMBC42 Kerbside Y 40 (4 months) 40 30 DMBC46 Kerbside Y 46 DMBC47 Kerbside Y 48 (6 months) 38 DMBC48 Roadside Y 52 (6 months) 45 DMBC49 Roadside N 43 (6 months) 32 DMBC50 Roadside N 53 (6 months) 41

The data in table 2.6 has been collated into graphs to show relevant trends within the AQMAs and for longer term sites outside of the AQMA’s. Figure 2.4 shows a varied pattern, some increasing, others decreasing over the monitoring period. In 2011 there were no exceedences when using the national factor, however with local factors applied a more stable trend would be seen.

LAQM USA 2012 36

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.4 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA1

2 30 DMBC9 DMBC10

20 NO2 in microgrammes per cubic metre NO2microgrammes per in

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 37

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council AQMA2 monitoring shows a fairly stable trend until 2011, there continues to be a number of exceedences and when local factors are considered the trend remains the same but with a less significant decrease.

LAQM USA 2012 38

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.5 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA2

21 40 22 27 28 30 29 30

20 NO2 in microgrammes cubic per metre

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 39

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

AQMA3 results as shown in figure 2.6 highlight a stable trend, no exceedences are found in 2011 but monitoring will continue, additionally using the local factors the sites in the graph continue to exceed.

LAQM USA 2012 40

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.6 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA3

5 30 DMBC8

20 NO2 in microgrammes NO2metre cubic per in

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 41

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Figure 2.7 shows diffusion tubes in AQMA4, again the trend is pretty stable until 2011 (continues to be stable with local factors), even with the lower results one exceedence remains.

LAQM USA 2012 42

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.7 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – AQMA4

13 30 DMBC14

20 NO2in per microgrammes cubic metre

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 43

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Outside of AQMA’s there are a number of long term sites, shown in figure 2.8, which exceed the annual mean objective. These sites do not represent relevant exposure but are worst case. The concentrations are stable with the typical exaggerated decrease caused by the 2011 bias adjustment, even so exceedences remain.

Sites DMBC30 and DMBC50 need to be moved to areas nearby which are representative of relevant exposure.

LAQM USA 2012 44

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Figure 2.8 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations measured at Diffusion Tube Monitoring Sites – Long- term monitoring outside of AQMA’s

4 19 30 20 DMBC30 DMBC50

20 NO2 in microgrmammes per cubic metre cubic per microgrmammes NO2 in

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

LAQM USA 2012 45

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council In conclusion the data for nitrogen dioxide presented above confirms the validity of the current five AQMAs and highlights an area which will need further investigation. The concentrations across most of Doncaster remain below the objectives.

LAQM USA 2012 46

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

2.2.2 PM 10

The PM10 data presented here has been corrected using the VCM model, in line with current guidance.

PM10 levels in Doncaster are relatively stable with some slight increase since 2008 however they remain well below the objective levels. In 2011 (table2.8) there has been an increase in the number of exceedences for the 24-hour mean. It is still well within the 35 exceedences allowed but is much higher than previous years and was seen at 2 sites. Unit 1 may have experienced an increase in exceedences due to its proximity to road and building works.

LAQM USA 2012 47 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.7 Results of Automatic Monitoring of PM 10 : Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Valid Data Valid Confirm Annual Mean Concentration µµµg/m 3 Capture for Data Gravimetric Within monitoring Capture Equivalent Site ID Site Type AQMA? Period % a 2011 % b (Y or NA) 2007* c 2008* c 2009* c 2010* c 2011 c Unit 1 A18 Carr Roadside Y n/a 95 Y 20.5 21.7 24.7 House Road Unit 3 Urban Market Y n/a 98 Y 18.2 19.8 21.5 22.8 centre Place Unit 10 A6023 Low Roadside Y 93 56 Y 22.6 Road, Conisbrough a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year. b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%.) c Means should be “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09), if monitoring was not carried out for the full year. * Optional

LAQM USA 2012 48 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Table 2.8 Results of Automatic Monitoring for PM 10 : Comparison with 24-hour mean Objective Valid Data Valid Number of Exceedences of 24-Hour Mean (50 µµµg/m 3) Capture for Data Confirm Within monitoring Capture Gravimetric Site ID Site Type AQMA? Period % a 2011 % b Equivalent 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011 Unit 1 A18 Carr Roadside Y n/a 95 Y 4 (30.3) 7 15 House Road Unit 3 Urban Market Y n/a 98 Y 6 (27.4) 5 5 (33.4) 15 centre Place Unit 10 A6023 Low Roadside Y 93 56 Y 2 Road, Conisbrough a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year. b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%.) c if data capture is less than 90%, include the 90 th percentile of 24-hour means in brackets * Optional

In conclusion the PM10 data presented in this report shows that there is little likelihood of the either of the PM10 objectives being exceeded.

LAQM USA 2012 49 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

2.2.3 Sulphur Dioxide

No sulphur dioxide monitoring has been undertaken in the borough during 2011.

2.2.4 Benzene

No benzene monitoring has been undertaken in the borough during 2011.

2.2.5 Other pollutants monitored

Radiation monitoring takes place at 4 locations on one site in Doncaster. Graphs showing long-term monitoring from 2004 show the level of gamma ray air kerma rate measured in microGray’s per Hour. The graphs can be found in the appendices. Levels remain relatively stable across the four sites in the last four years.

During 2011 the number of nuisance complaints received by the Environmental Health department of the Council was 4 dust complaints and 105 odour complaints. None of the complaints represent a likely source for exceedence of the objectives.

LAQM USA 2012 50 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

2.2.6 Summary of Compliance with AQS Objectives

Doncaster Council has measured concentrations of nitrogen dioxide above the annual mean objective at relevant locations outside of the AQMA’s, and will need to proceed to a Detailed Assessment , for the A635, Barnsley Road, Hickleton.

LAQM USA 2012 51 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

3 Road Traffic Sources

3.1 Narrow Congested Streets with Residential Properties Close to the Kerb

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified congested streets with a flow above 5,000 vehicles per day and residential properties close to the kerb, that have not been adequately considered in previous rounds of Review and Assessment.

3.2 Busy Streets Where People May Spend 1-hour or More Close to Traffic

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified busy streets where people may spend 1 hour or more close to traffic.

3.3 Roads with a High Flow of Buses and/or HDVs.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified roads with high flows of buses/HDVs.

3.4 Junctions

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified busy junctions/busy roads.

3.5 New Roads Constructed or Proposed Since the Last Round of Review and Assessment

There are a number of proposed road schemes being considered in the area, however currently only one has obtained planning permission. This scheme is for the widening of the A6182, White Rose Way. An air quality assessment has been prepared and reviewed and in addition monitoring has been carried out prior to the scheme construction and will be repeated once the development is operational. The

LAQM USA 2012 52 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council conclusion was that there would not be any significant air quality impacts arising from the development.

Other schemes which have been proposed include new roads linking with the motorway network one to the north-east of the Borough and a further road to the south. An air quality assessment will be required for both prior to planning permission.

Doncaster Council has assessed new/proposed roads meeting the criteria in Section A.5 of Box 5.3 in TG(09), and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

3.6 Roads with Significantly Changed Traffic Flows

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified roads with significantly changed traffic flows.

3.7 Bus and Coach Stations

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no relevant bus stations in the Local Authority area.

LAQM USA 2012 53 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

4 Other Transport Sources 4.1 Airports

Robin Hood Doncaster Sheffield Airport opened in April 2005 and is located in Finningley, approximately 6km to the south east of Doncaster town centre. The projected effects of the airport were considered in the first round of review and assessment. The 2003 USA found that the airport did not, at that time, meet the criteria for further assessment. In accordance with the criteria set out within Section B.1 of LAQM.TG(09), whilst there is relevant exposure within 1000m of the airport boundary the total equivalent passenger throughput is less than 10mppa and the existing background concentration is not above 25 µg/m 3, therefore no further assessment is required.

Nitrogen dioxide diffusion tube monitoring has been conducted in the vicinity since November 2004. The airport also operates an automatic monitoring station which monitors for nitrogen dioxide in the grounds of the airport. No exceedences of the annual or hourly objective for nitrogen dioxide have been recorded.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no airports meeting the assessment criteria in the Local Authority area.

4.2 Railways (Diesel and Steam Trains)

4.2.1 Stationary Trains

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no locations where diesel or steam trains are regularly stationary for periods of 15 minutes or more, with potential for relevant exposure within 15m.

LAQM USA 2012 54 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

4.2.2 Moving Trains

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no locations with a large number of movements of diesel locomotives, and potential long-term relevant exposure within 30m.

4.3 Ports (Shipping)

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no ports or shipping that meet the specified criteria within the Local Authority area.

LAQM USA 2012 55 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

5 Industrial Sources 5.1 Industrial Installations

5.1.1 New or Proposed Installations for which an Air Quality Assessment has been Carried Out

A gas-fired Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) electricity generating station has been granted planning permission. An air quality assessment was undertaken which met with current guidance and the results showed no likely exceedences of the objectives at receptors. Construction is due to start in 2012.

A new Anaerobic Digestion Facility has been installed at Propser Demulders site close to AQMA1, an air quality assessment was produced and the installation is regulated by the Environment Agency. The conclusions of the assessment were that any increases would be small to imperceptible and would result in a slight adverse impact on the AQMA1.

Doncaster Council has assessed new/proposed industrial installations, and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

5.1.2 Existing Installations where Emissions have Increased Substantially or New Relevant Exposure has been Introduced

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no industrial installations with substantially increased emissions or new relevant exposure in their vicinity within its area or nearby in a neighbouring authority.

LAQM USA 2012 56 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

5.1.3 New or Significantly Changed Installations with No Previous Air Quality Assessment

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no new or proposed industrial installations for which planning approval has been granted within its area or nearby in a neighbouring authority.

5.2 Major Fuel (Petrol) Storage Depots

There are no major fuel (petrol) storage depots within the Local Authority area.

5.3 Petrol Stations

There has been one new petrol station within the area since 2009. There is however no relevant exposure in the area.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no petrol stations meeting the specified criteria .

5.4 Poultry Farms

There are no poultry farms within the Doncaster borough that exceed the criteria as listed within section C.4 of LAQM.TG(09). The largest poultry farm in the borough has no more than 40,000 birds at one time.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no poultry farms meeting the specified criteria.

LAQM USA 2012 57 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

6 Commercial and Domestic Sources

6.1 Biomass Combustion – Individual Installations

One further biomass installation has been identified. A new school, Campsmount Technology College, installed biomass in 2012. Unfortunately the details have not yet been made available and therefore no screening assessment has been carried out. Once details are received screening will be reported in the next Progress Report in 2013. If the screening indicates a likely exceedence of the objective a Detailed Assessment will be completed in 2013. Therefore the conclusion will be for a Detailed Assessment unless screening determines otherwise.

Doncaster Council has not been able to assess biomass combustion plant, and concluded that it will be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment for NO 2 and PM 10 .

6.2 Biomass Combustion – Combined Impacts

There are no areas with significant biomass combustion within the Borough. Individual large installations have been assessed above.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no biomass combustion plant in the Local Authority area.

6.3 Domestic Solid-Fuel Burning

Previous assessments based on smoke control surveys confirmed that there were no significant solid fuel burning areas in the Borough. The entire area is under a Smoke

LAQM USA 2012 58 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Control Order and complaints regarding smoking chimneys would be investigated by the Environmental Health Team and would indicate any areas where solid fuel burning was increasing. No such areas have been identified.

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no areas of significant domestic fuel use in the Local Authority area.

LAQM USA 2012 59 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

7 Fugitive or Uncontrolled Sources

Doncaster Council confirms that there are no potential sources of fugitive particulate matter emissions in the Local Authority area.

LAQM USA 2012 60 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions

8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data

New monitoring data supports the requirement for Doncaster’s 5 AQMAs, although not all AQMA sites exceed, in each there is enough evidence that the designations remain valid. Trends are generally stable with no obvious decreases which are not attributed to the 2011 bias adjustment or other QA/QC issues described in the report. In addition to Skellow, for which a Detailed Assessment is due, a new area of exceedence has been identified. A Detailed Assessment will be required for both annual mean and the 1-hour objective for NO 2 in the village of Hickleton.

8.2 Conclusions from Assessment of Sources

No new or significantly changed sources have been assessed that could lead to an exceedence outside of the AQMA’s. However due to lack of information for the screening of a biomass installation at Campsmount Technology College to be carried out it has been decided that a detailed assessment may be required until screening can prove otherwise.

8.3 Proposed Actions

A Detailed Assessment will be required for both annual mean and the 1-hour objective for NO 2 in the village of Hickleton on the A635, Barnsley Road. A further Detailed Assessment maybe required for a biomass installation at Campsmount Technology College. If screening shows that there is unlikely to be an exceedence this will be reported in the 2013 Progress Report.

Diffusion tube sites 30 and 50 need to be relocated to areas of relevant exposure and automatic monitoring needs to be implemented at Hickleton.

LAQM USA 2012 61 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Exisiting AQMA’s are valid and boundaries adequately cover the known area of exceedence.

In 2013 Doncaster Council will submit; - A Progress Report

- A Detailed Assessment for the annual mean and the 1-hour objective for NO 2 in the village of Hickleton on the A635, Barnsley Road, and if necessary for the biomass installation at Campsmount Technology College.

LAQM USA 2012 62 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

9 References

Air Quality Archive Internet website: www.airquality.co.uk

Defra website: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/air/air-quality/

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework: https://www.doncaster.gov.uk/Living_in_Doncaster/Neighbourhoods/Planning/Local_ Development_Framework/LDF_-_Annual_Monitoring_Report.asp

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Planning Policy

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Public Access: http://local.doncaster.gov.uk/PublicAccess/default.aspx

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Pollution Control, Air Quality Review and Assessment Reports, Various, 1998 – 2008

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Strategic Transportation Unit

Environment Agency Website, www.environment-agency.gov.uk

Local Air Quality Management Technical Guidance LAQM. TG(09), issued by DEFRA

Prosper Demulder Ltd, Anaerobic Digestion Facility Atmosphereic Dispersion Modelling Report, GF Environmental Ltd, July 2011

Public Access Portal, Various air quality assessements, http://www.doncaster.gov.uk/Environment_and_Planning/Planning/plan_public_acce ss/Planning_Applications_Online.asp

The South Yorkshire Transport Plan: http://www.interchanges.co.uk/syltp/documents.htm

Thorpe Marsh CCGT Power Station, Environmental Statement, Sinclair Knight Merz, January 2010

LAQM USA 2012 63 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Appendices

LAQM USA 2012 64 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Appendix A: QA:QC Data

Factor from Local Co-location Studies (if available) No suitable co-location study was carried out.

Diffusion Tube Bias Adjustment Factors The tubes are supplied and analysed by South Yorkshire Laboratories who have UKAS accreditation. The tubes are prepared by spiking acetone:triethanolamine (50:50) onto the grids prior to the tubes being assembled. The tubes are then desorbed with distilled water and the extract analysed using a segmented flow auto analyser with ultraviolet detection.

Bias used was derived from the national factor on http://www.uwe.ac.uk/aqm/review/R&Asupport/diffusiontube310310.xls . The bias for 2011 was 0.79.

Discussion of Choice of Factor to Use No suitable co-location was carried out within Doncaster Borough however the neighbouring authorities of Rotherham and Barnsley Councils have conducted such studies and the bias obtained was in good agreement with the one used. The national factor has been used within the LAQM reporting regime for several years and to maintain consistency in reporting the national factor will be used however consideration is always given to neighbouring authorities factors.

PM Monitoring Adjustment

PM 10 data for 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were corrected to gravimetric equivalent using King’s College London Volatile Correction Method (VCM) for PM 10 as in Section A1.62 of TG(09). These results may therefore differ from previous years, which were corrected using the factor as per the relevant procedure at that time (up until and including 2007 date). Comparison against previous years should therefore be viewed with caution.

Short-term to Long-term Data adjustment Unit 10, Conisbrough monitoring period was June to December 2011. therefore the following workings show how the annualised result shown in the report has been derived. Only two sites had over 90% data capture and so these were the only ones suitable for use. Site Site Type Annual Mean Period Mean Ratio Unit 4 Automatic 40.5 38.2 1.06 Unit 9 Automatic 33.2 30.4 1.09 Average 1.075

QA/QC of automatic monitoring

LAQM USA 2012 65 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

The QA/QC procedure consists of bi-monthly calibrations performed manually on-site by the Local Site Operator (Doncaster Council). Daily data checks are carried out remotely.

An outside contractor performs six-monthly services and all units are covered by a service and maintenance agreement including call-out services.

The last independent audit was carried out in November 2007, the analysers were found to be satisfactory with the exception of one TEOM which fell outside the standard parameters. This has now been rectified.

Data is scaled, validated and ratified in house and includes removing erroneous data and applying relevant calculations in line with the technical guidance to obtain the final data set.

QA/QC of diffusion tube monitoring Tube precision in 2011 was good for most of the period with one instance of poor precision. The WASP scheme lists the laboratory’s performance as 100% of results as satisfactory in the latest available report. In 2009 procedures have been amended so that the laboratory is in line with the harmonisation procedures.

LAQM USA 2012 66 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Appendix B: Maps of Locations

LAQM USA 2012 67 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 68 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 69 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 70 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 71 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 72 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 73 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 74 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 75 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 76 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 77 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 78 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

D 13

D 27

LAQM USA 2012 79 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 80 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

D 17

D 15

LAQM USA 2012 81 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

D 17

D 16

D 20

LAQM USA 2012 82 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

D 18

8 7

LAQM USA 2012 83 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

D4 D2

LAQM USA 2012 84 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

20 19

14 17

LAQM USA 2012 85 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 86 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

27 21

LAQM USA 2012 87 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

1 D 11

2 D 12 3

4 5 6

20 19 D8

LAQM USA 2012 88 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

39 25

42 40

LAQM USA 2012 89 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Appendix C: Diffusion tube raw data. USA Diffusion Tube Appendix

Sites not included in the main text results but to be included within an appendix! Short Term sites!

Site ID Location Site Type Within Triplicate or Data Data with less Confirm if data Annual mean AQMA? Collocated Capture than 9 months has been concentration Tube 2011 has been distance (Bias Adjustment factor = (Number of annualised (Y/N) corrected (Y/N) 0.79) Months or %) 2011 ( µg/m3) DMBC36 Far Field Road, Urban N N 11 n/a N 23 Edenthorpe Background DMBC38 Eden Field Road, Urban N N 12 n/a N 23 Edenthorpe Background DMBC43 Wood Walk, Urban N N 12 n/a N 21 Mexborough Background DMBC44 Adwick Upon Roadside N N 11 n/a N 21 Dearne DMBC45 Highwoods Urban N N 12 n/a N 23 Crescent, Background Mexborough

LAQM USA 2012 90 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

LAQM USA 2012 91 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Raw Diffusion Tube Data for USA Appendix:

Annual mean concentration 2011 µµµg/m 3 2011 2011 2011 2011 Raw Data (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Name Factor = 0.79 A) Factor = 0.91 B) Factor = 0.96 C) 1 North Bridge (North) 40 32 37 39 2 North Bridge (South) 47 37 43 45 3 Regent Sq. 37 29 33 35 4 South Parade 54 42 49 52 5 Bennethorpe Road 50 39 45 48 6 Carr House Road 39 31 35 37 7 Sheep bridge Lane 36 29 33 35 8 Hayfield Lane 30 24 27 29 9 Hurst Lane 31 24 28 29 10 Hayfield Lane/Hurst Lane 26 20 23 25 11 Gattison Lane 26 20 23 25 12 West End Lane 29 23 26 27 13 Bawtry Road 51 40 46 49 14 Stoops Lane 49 39 45 47 15 Dunniwood Avenue 27 21 25 26 16 Burnham Close 27 21 25 26 17 Lindrick Close 26 21 24 25 18 Cantley Lane 32 26 29 31 19 Gliwice Way (Dome) 51 40 46 49 20 Gliwice Way (Town) 49 38 44 47 21 Hall Flat Junction 58 46 53 56 22 Warde Avenue 57 45 52 55 23 Norbreck Road 31 25 29 30 24 Low Road 47 37 42 45 25 Clifton Hill Junction 45 36 41 44 26 Mill Lane 34 27 31 32

LAQM USA 2012 92 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Annual mean concentration 2011 µµµg/m 3 2011 2011 2011 2011 Raw Data (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Name Factor = 0.79 A) Factor = 0.91 B) Factor = 0.96 C) 27 Waverley Avenue 44 34 40 42 28 High Road 51 40 46 49 29 Belmont Avenue 47 37 43 45 30 Mansfield Road 60 47 54 57 DMBC1 Airport – Hayfield Lane 19 15 17 18 DMBC2 Airport – Gate House Lane 21 16 19 20 DMBC3 Airport – Mosham Road 20 16 18 19 DMBC4 Airport – Rose Cottage 24 19 22 23 DMBC5 Airport – Hatfield Moors 16 12 14 15 DMBC6 Airport – Hatfield Woodhouse 27 21 24 26 DMBC7 Airport -Hollinbridge Lane 15 12 14 14 DMBC8 Clark Avenue 46 36 41 44 DMBC9 Market Place 42 33 38 40 DMBC10 Church Way 49 38 44 47 DMBC11 Stainforth 22 17 20 21 DMBC13 KS Sandall Lane 29 23 27 28 DMBC12 KS Horton View 18 14 16 17 DMBC14 Warning Tongue Lane 45 36 41 43 DMBC15 Howden Avenue, Skellow 41 32 37 39 DMBC16 Hill Crest, Skellow 56 44 51 54 DMBC17 Five Lane Ends, A1, Skellow 59 46 54 56 DMBC25 Skellow – Crabgate Lane 56 44 51 53 DMBC26 Skellow – Hampole Balk 46 36 42 44 DMBC18 Hickleton – Sue Ryder Care Home 78 62 71 75 DMBC19 Hickleton – Opp. Castle Hill Fold 49 38 44 47 DMBC20 Hickleton – Opp. Fir Tree Close 86 68 78 82 DMBC21 Hickleton – John O’Gaunts 90 71 82 86

LAQM USA 2012 93 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Annual mean concentration 2011 µµµg/m 3 2011 2011 2011 2011 Raw Data (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment (Bias Adjustment Site ID Site Name Factor = 0.79 A) Factor = 0.91 B) Factor = 0.96 C) DMBC27 Hatfield Post Office 39 31 35 37 DMBC28 Doncaster Road, Dunscroft 36 28 32 34 DMBC29 Thorne – Fieldside 37 29 34 36 DMBC30 Thorne – King Street 46 36 42 44 DMBC31 Thorne – South Parade 41 32 37 39 DMBC35 Barnby Dun 26 21 24 25 DMBC37 High Street, Bentley 40 31 36 38 DMBC39 Willow Street, Conisbrough 44 35 40 42 DMBC40 Doncaster Road, Conisbrough 52 41 47 50 DMBC41 Sheffield Road, Conisbrough 39 31 35 37 DMBC42 Low Road Junction, Conisbrough 38 30 35 37 DMBC46 3 Low Road, Conisbrough 58 46 53 56 DMBC47 27 Low Road, Conisbrough 48 38 44 46 DMBC48 32/34 Low Road, Conisbrough 56 45 51 54 DMBC49 Mason Arms, Mexborough 41 32 37 39 DMBC50 Doncaster Road, Mexbrough 52 41 48 50 A National Bias Adjustment Factor B Local Barnsley Bias Adjustment Factor C Local Sheffield Bias Adjustment Factor

LAQM USA 2012 94 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 2011 Monthly Diffusion Tube Data

Site ID Site Name Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Average 1 North Bridge (North) 59 47 50 36 27 29 31 34 48 47 35 40 2 North Bridge (South) 50 61 53 43 42 38 40 36 45 57 52 51 47 3 Regent Sq. 43 40 37 29 32 32 32 38 42 41 37 4 South Parade 59 57 70 51 44 46 44 48 56 54 61 54 5 Bennethorpe Road 53 59 55 47 37 41 45 40 46 56 64 53 50 6 Carr House Road 47 45 43 32 35 34 28 35 42 46 39 7 Sheep bridge Lane 43 37 39 35 26 33 38 32 32 39 42 42 36 8 Hayfield Lane 38 37 36 27 20 22 22 23 22 35 45 32 30 9 Hurst Lane 39 29 32 30 27 31 32 29 26 29 29 33 31 10 Hayfield Lane/Hurst Lane 42 28 33 25 16 21 20 21 21 25 29 26 11 Gattison Lane 39 30 31 24 17 19 21 16 25 36 25 26 12 West End Lane 38 36 32 29 19 23 26 25 25 31 33 26 29 13 Bawtry Road 56 57 50 39 44 49 50 50 61 61 41 51 14 Stoops Lane 57 56 50 47 40 45 47 40 51 61 56 43 49 15 Dunniwood Avenue 42 33 39 25 17 18 21 19 20 28 37 24 27 16 Burnham Close 41 35 32 26 15 21 22 19 22 27 40 26 27 17 Lindrick Close 35 36 34 23 17 19 21 20 20 30 36 23 26 18 Cantley Lane 43 45 40 32 22 21 25 25 34 45 25 32 19 Gliwice Way (Dome) 64 59 60 48 35 47 47 48 45 53 54 50 51 20 Gliwice Way (Town) 52 67 64 46 35 40 39 41 35 55 69 40 49 21 Hall Flat Junction 59 70 63 56 48 60 55 49 47 69 72 50 58 22 Warde Avenue 68 72 67 63 41 56 54 51 45 61 66 43 57 23 Norbreck Road 45 41 37 35 23 24 24 23 25 33 39 28 31 24 Low Road 54 54 51 50 35 39 43 38 42 55 64 35 47 25 Clifton Hill Junction 52 56 46 43 37 40 42 38 42 56 59 36 45 26 Mill Lane 40 53 45 33 24 23 16 27 25 40 58 19 34 27 Waverley Avenue 46 63 53 46 31 34 33 35 37 55 59 31 44 28 High Road 54 60 39 57 59 37 51 29 Belmont Avenue 56 51 49 50 37 44 41 45 42 48 52 48 47 30 Mansfield Road 75 71 70 64 45 52 48 57 50 59 65 60

LAQM USA 2012 95 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

DMBC1 Hayfield Lane 31 21 21 18 11 27 14 15 13 17 22 18 19 DMBC2 Gate House Lane 28 28 28 20 12 15 15 17 15 22 28 20 21 DMBC3 Mosham Road 28 24 25 19 14 15 14 16 15 23 26 21 20 DMBC4 Rose Cottage 50 34 27 22 15 20 20 20 16 21 21 19 24 DMBC5 Hatfield Moors 26 19 20 14 11 11 11 11 11 16 23 16 16 DMBC6 Hatfield Woodhouse 37 36 30 25 21 20 20 22 22 27 34 27 27 DMBC7 Hollinbridge Lane 22 22 16 9 10 11 9 12 13 16 22 18 15 DMBC8 Clark Avenue 52 50 56 46 38 41 44 38 48 45 44 46 DMBC9 Market 51 45 54 41 33 33 38 39 33 48 49 40 42 DMBC10 Church Way 58 65 68 44 37 37 47 39 40 53 55 40 49 DMBC11 Stainforth 34 28 30 21 15 15 14 16 18 22 30 20 22 DMBC13 Sandall Lane 38 33 36 27 23 22 25 24 30 32 31 29 DMBC12 Horton View 25 25 22 14 13 10 11 11 16 22 27 18 18 DMBC14 Warning Tongue Lane 53 56 57 45 46 36 33 33 37 52 52 41 45 DMBC15 Howden Avenue, Skellow 40 44 39 37 43 36 43 41 41 45 41 41 DMBC16 Hill Crest - Skellow 60 59 62 55 45 54 62 52 49 61 60 49 56 DMBC17 Five Lane Ends A1, Skellow 61 62 54 55 64 57 58 60 65 54 57 59 DMBC25 Crabgate Lane, Skellow 65 60 63 51 47 55 47 50 50 60 59 59 56 DMBC26 Hampole Balk, Skellow 60 5 55 51 45 50 43 49 42 56 42 52 46 Sue Ryder Care Home, DMBC18 91 81 102 43 68 78 78 77 82 89 77 69 78 Hickleton DMBC19 Opp. Castle Hill Fold, Hickleton 50 56 54 68 81 39 40 39 34 46 48 29 49 DMBC20 Opp. Fir Tree Close, Hickleton 81 84 95 79 90 83 81 86 87 103 87 71 86 DMBC21 John O'Gaunts, Hickleton 93 87 88 41 115 123 97 98 91 91 66 90 DMBC27 Hatfield Post Office, Dunscroft 48 50 41 34 33 35 33 33 43 39 37 39 DMBC28 Doncaster Road, Dunscroft 42 44 45 33 23 25 28 38 44 35 36 DMBC29 Fieldside, Thorne 42 44 52 39 29 29 32 31 32 37 41 36 37 DMBC30 King Street, Thorne 54 50 57 41 36 38 37 54 44 46 DMBC31 South Parade, Thorne 46 44 51 41 32 32 31 36 38 48 48 46 41 DMBC35 Barnby Dun 31 30 37 28 23 22 19 22 6 32 39 29 26 DMBC37 High Street, Bentley 47 44 52 41 31 32 33 32 30 46 50 40

LAQM USA 2012 96 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

DMBC39 Willow Street, Conisbrough 45 53 54 41 36 35 34 36 38 53 60 42 44 DMBC40 Doncaster Rd, Conisbrough 57 58 65 58 42 45 47 46 42 54 60 50 52 DMBC41 Sheffield Rd, Conisbrough 50 45 43 43 25 33 35 33 29 43 48 38 39 DMBC42 Low Rd Junction, Conisbrough 44 49 43 39 28 33 36 30 28 44 48 36 38 DMBC46 3 Low Road, Conisbrough 64 65 51 55 49 47 57 50 52 77 63 66 58 DMBC47 27 Low Road, Conisbrough 54 55 56 51 35 38 49 42 39 52 62 42 48 DMBC48 32/34 Low Road, Conisbrough 56 62 57 53 47 54 55 48 52 63 69 62 56 DMBC49 Mason Arms, Mexborough 50 48 51 43 29 33 31 39 26 47 48 41 41 DMBC50 Doncaster Road, Mexborough 66 63 61 50 45 49 46 39 42 65 51 52

LAQM USA 2012 97 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Appendix D: Radiation Graphs.

SITE A

0.06

0.05

0.04

1ST READING 0.03 2ND READING AIR KERMA RATE KERMA AIR 0.02

0.01

0 16/02/2004 16/05/2004 16/08/2004 16/11/2004 16/02/2005 16/05/2005 16/08/2005 16/11/2005 16/02/2006 16/05/2006 16/08/2006 16/11/2006 16/02/2007 16/05/2007 16/08/2007 16/11/2007 16/02/2008 16/05/2008 16/08/2008 16/11/2008 16/02/2009 16/05/2009 16/08/2009 16/11/2009 16/02/2010 16/05/2010 16/08/2010 16/11/2010 16/02/2011 16/05/2011 16/08/2011 16/11/2011 DATE

SITE B

0.06

0.05

0.04

1ST READING 0.03 2ND READING AIR KERMA RATE KERMA AIR 0.02

0.01

LAQM USA 2012 98 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

SITE C

0.05

0.045

0.04

0.035

0.03

1ST READING 0.025 2ND READING

0.02 AIR KERMA RATE KERMA AIR

0.015

0.01

0.005

SITE D

0.06

0.05

0.04

1ST READING 0.03 2ND READING AIR KERMA RATE KERMA AIR 0.02

0.01

LAQM USA 2012 99 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Information will be made available, where possible, in alternate formats on request to; Pollution Control Floor 3 Council House College Road Doncaster DN1 1RN Tel: 01302 737579 E-mail: [email protected]

LAQM USA 2012 100