Reconnecting Wildlife Corridors on the U.S.-Mexico Border © MATT CLARK MATT © Take Down the Wall: Reconnecting Wildlife Corridors on the U.S.-Mexico Border

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconnecting Wildlife Corridors on the U.S.-Mexico Border © MATT CLARK MATT © Take Down the Wall: Reconnecting Wildlife Corridors on the U.S.-Mexico Border TAKE DOWN THE WALL Reconnecting Wildlife Corridors on the U.S.-Mexico Border © MATT CLARK MATT © TAKE DOWN THE WALL: RECONNECTING WILDLIFE CORRIDORS ON THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER Introduction n addition to harming human communities, border To protect wildlife, habitat and our national investment wall construction has destroyed widespread areas of in conservation, Defenders of Wildlife calls on the Biden Ithe nation’s most valuable wildlife habitat, including administration to: within national wildlife refuges, national monuments and n Immediately open all gates in the wall (e.g., flood gates wilderness areas. The U.S.-Mexico border runs through at San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area) so deserts with scant and unpredictable water supplies, where that wildlife can freely pass. many animals live a precarious existence. An impenetrable n Turn off lights and reduce noise and human activity in barrier that stops them from finding the resources they need areas important to wildlife. can threaten their survival. n Remove wall segments that are most harmful to wildlife If critical parts of the border are not reopened to wildlife, or, at minimum, replace them with vehicle barriers our country will lose substantial ground in our efforts to designed to allow wildlife to cross. restore endangered species and conserve natural habitat in the borderlands. Our considerable investments in federal Criteria for Wall Removal conservation lands will be at risk. Defenders identified 18 wall segments as top priorities for removal because they harm or degrade one or more of the following: n Biodiversity: Areas with unusually high numbers of species and/or high numbers of rare species. n Critical habitat: Federally designated critical habitat for federal endangered and threatened species. n Endangered species: Federally endangered and threatened species. n Protected areas: National wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, wilderness study areas, national monuments, national parks or other protected areas with a mission that includes safeguarding wildlife. n Water resources: Rivers, streams, springs, wetlands or groundwater. n Wildlife corridors: Access to water, food, mates or other resources necessary for survival. Top-priority Wall Segments for Removal The wall segments recommended for removal are listed from west to east below along with a brief description, removal justification criteria, location (GPS coordinates for endpoints) and/or segment name and the construction status with PRONGHORN BY BLM/LISA BY PRONGHORN PHILLIPS verifying sources for each one. This document is based on information collected by many organizations working together to identify border wall segments that are top priorities for removal. Myles For more information: Traphagen of Wildlands Network and Dan Millis and Scott Nicol of the Sierra Club [email protected] contributed significantly to the collection and analysis of information presented here. 2 TAKE DOWN THE WALL: RECONNECTING WILDLIFE CORRIDORS ON THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER California Otay Mountain Wilderness Area, San Diego County Jacumba Mountains Wilderness Area, Imperial This segment is endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly and County Tecate cypress habitat on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) This segment is designated critical habitat for Peninsular lands. Walls built through and adjacent to the designated bighorn sheep. Walls have been recently completed through Wilderness Area during the Bush and Trump administrations the Davies Valley and Skull Valley portions of the Jacumba have caused enormous erosion damage and degraded the Mountains Wilderness, affecting endangered Peninsular habitat of protected species. The wall curves dramatically bighorn sheep and flat-tailed horned lizard, the latter pro- into the U.S., leaving significant amounts of our land isolated tected by a multiagency conservation agreement in Arizona between the wall and Mexico. The recently constructed SD4 and California. The border wall and associated roads hinders double-wall is particularly harmful due to its extra-wide wildlife movement, including ability of federally listed footprint and the fact that any wildlife seeking to cross Peninsular bighorn sheep to reach drinking water. through here must negotiate two walls instead of just one. Removal justification criteria:Critical habitat, endangered Removal justification criteria: Endangered species, protected species, protected areas (designated wilderness), water resources areas (national monument), wildlife corridors (drinking water) Wall segments: San Diego 4 and Bush/Obama-era walls east Wall segments: El Centro Project A:1 (3.2 miles) of there. Status and source: Wall complete. 2021. (CBP map states Status and sources: Under construction (San Diego 4), U.S. “complete.”) Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) map and on-the-ground reports, January, 2021. Older walls to the east complete. QUINO CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY BY USFWS/ANDREW FISHER GOWER USFWS/PAT BY SHEEP PENINSULAR BIGHORN 3 TAKE DOWN THE WALL: RECONNECTING WILDLIFE CORRIDORS ON THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER California border wall segments recommended for removal 78 Escondido Legend 78 U.S.- Mexico border 78 nn Wall segment recommended for removal NF National Forest U.S. Naval Reservation Santee Anza-Borrego Desert State Ewiiaapaayp Park 1592ft Reservation El Cajon Jacumba Mountains Cleveland 8 San Diego NF Wilderness Area GPS endpoint coordinates: 32.6315,-115.9389 to 32.6273, -115.99381 Chula Vista Campo Indian Reservation Tecate Tijuana Otay Mountain Wilderness Area 2 GPS endpoint coordinates: 32.5588, -116.8412253 to 32.5558, -116.877792 Playasde Rosarito 3 1856m California 0 10 20 Miles Basemap: SanGIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, Esri, CGIAR, USGS 4 TAKE DOWN THE WALL: RECONNECTING WILDLIFE CORRIDORS ON THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER Arizona Las Playas-Pinta Sands, Cabeza Prieta National Wall segment: Tucson Project 1:1 (4.3 miles) Wildlife Refuge, Yuma and Pima Counties Status and sources: Wall complete but with ongoing activity, When rare rain falls in the central part of Cabeza Prieta on-the-ground reports, January, 2021. (CBP map states National Wildlife Refuge, it flows into the ephemeral Las “complete.”) Playas lakes, located next to the international border. When the playas are wet, they become islands of green that host Quitobaquito Hills Spring Complex, Organ Pipe rare plants and animals, including the federally endangered Cactus National Monument, Pima County Sonoran pronghorn. Quitobaquito springs and pond in Organ Pipe Cactus The wall segment also cuts through El Gran Desierto National Monument are the only sites in the U.S. where the de Altar, the largest active dune system in North America, federally endangered Quitobaquito pupfish and endangered extending from the U.S. Pinta Sands into Mexico. Many Sonoyta mud turtle occur. The springs are critical habitat for plants and animals are found only in El Gran Desierto, the Sonoyta mud turtle. These oases are within the histori- including fringe-toed lizards, flat-tailed horned lizards, giant cally occupied range and potential recovery habitat of the Spanish needles and blue sand lilies. Vast fields of wildflowers federally endangered Sonoran pronghorn. Native American bloom on the dunes after winter rains, in contrast with the Tribes continue to hold ceremonies on Quitobaquito and use drier, surrounding desert area. Endangered Sonoran prong- its plants for ceremonial and medicinal purposes. The amount horn thrive on the abundant forage. of water in the springs was greatly reduced in 2020 by Removal justification criteria: Biodiversity, endangered withdrawals from wells drilled for border wall construction. species, protected areas (national wildlife refuge), water Removal justification criteria: Critical habitat, endangered resources (wetlands) species, water resources (wetlands) Wall segments: Yuma Project 3:1 (6.3 miles) and Yuma 3:4 Wall segments: Tucson Project 1:1 (7 miles) (5.0 miles) Status and source: Wall complete but with ongoing activity, Status and sources: Under construction, CBP map and on-the-ground reports, January, 2021. (CBP map states on-the-ground reports, January, 2021. “complete.”) Sonoran Pronghorn Corridor, Cabeza Prieta Wildlife corridors in Baboquivari Mountains and National Wildlife Refuge, Yuma and Pima Counties Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge, Pima County This segment cuts across an important seasonal migratory These two segments include the westernmost unit of critical pathway for endangered Sonoran pronghorn. Fewer than habitat for jaguar (the Southern Baboquivari subunit) and 200 of these ungulates remain in the U.S., and their ability adjoin Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge was to survive depends on accessing large, uninterrupted created in 1985 to protect and conserve the masked bobwhite expanses of land where they can find scarce water and quail, an endangered subspecies of the northern bobwhite forage in one of the hottest, driest places in North America. quail. The refuge protects 115,000 acres of Sonoran Desert They range across nearly the entirety of Cabeza Prieta grassland and its associated native flora and fauna. National Wildlife Refuge, Organ Pipe Cactus National Removal justification criteria: Critical habitat, endangered Monument and across the Gran Desierto de Altar and species, protected areas (national wildlife refuge), wildlife Pinacare Reserves in Mexico. Their survival depends on corridors utilizing their entire home range in both countries.
Recommended publications
  • DGM-13 Report(PDF)
    Surficial Geology and Geologic Hazards of the Amado-Tubac area, Santa Cruz and Pima Counties, Arizona Amado and Tubac 7.5’ Quadrangles by Ann Youberg and Walter R. Helmick Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map 13 November, 2001 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 17 pages of text and two 1:24,000 scale geologic maps Research supported by the Arizona Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, under USGS award number #00HQAG0149. INTRODUCTION This report and accompanying maps describe the surficial geology, geomorphology, and geologic hazards of the rapidly developing Amado-Tubac area, south of the Green Valley area. The mapping covers the Amado and Tubac 7 1/2’ quadrangles (Figure 1). The map area is in unincorporated Santa Cruz and southern Pima Counties. It includes much of the southern part of the upper Santa Cruz Valley, between the Santa Rita Mountains on the east and the Tumacacori Mountains on the west. There are several potentially conflicting land use issues in the area covered by these maps. The Santa Rita and Tumacacori mountain ranges are public lands owned by the U.S. Forest Service. Several large ranches are located within the mapping area and are interspersed with state trust lands. Urbanization has occurred, and continues to occur, along the Santa Cruz River and around the communities of Arivaca Junction, Tubac, and Rio Rico, just south of the map area. Many areas of the Santa Rita piedmont have been subdivided and prepared for development, although development remains sparse. This report is intended to enhance our understanding of the surficial geology of the Amado-Tubac area and to aid in assessing and understanding geologic hazards in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001]
    Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Evaluation Report Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001] Area Overview Size and Location: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area (PWA) encompasses 37,330 acres. This area is located in the Tumacacori and Atacosa Mountains, which are part of the Nogales Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona (see Map 4 at the end of this document). The Tumacacori PWA is overlapped by 30,305 acres of the Tumacacori Inventoried Roadless Area, comprising 81 percent of the PWA. Vicinity, Surroundings and Access: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area is approximately 50 miles southeast of Tucson, Arizona. The Tumacacori PWA is centrally located within the mountain range and encompasses an area from Sardina and Tumacacori Peaks at the northern end to Ruby Road at the southern end and from the El Paso Natural Gas Line on the eastern side to Arivaca Lake on its western side. The PWA is adjacent to the Pajarita Wilderness Area, Arivaca Lake and Peña Blanca Lake. Both Pena Blanca and Arivaca Lakes are managed by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Interstate 19 (I-19) connects the Tucson metropolitan area to the City of Nogales and the incorporated community of Sahuarita. The unincorporated communities of Green Valley, Arivaca Junction-Amado, Tubac, Tumacacori-Carmen and Rio Rico, Arizona and Sonora, Mexico are within close proximity to the eastern side of the Tumacacori Mountains and the PWA. State Highway 289 provides access from I-19 across private and National Forest System lands into the Tumacacori Ecosystem Management Area to Peña Blanca Lake and Ruby Road (NFS Road 39).
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network
    Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network Kim Vacariu Wildlands Project, Tucson, AZ Abstract—One of the greatest challenges facing conservationists in the Sky Islands region is finding a realistic means to maintain historic travel routes for wide-ranging species crossing the United States-Mexico border. This challenge is made difficult due to the ongoing efforts by the Federal government to install additional security infrastructure to stem the flood of undocumented immigrants now entering southern Arizona. Existing and proposed fencing, solid steel walls, all- night stadium lighting, vehicle barriers, an immense network of roads, a 24-hour flow of patrol vehicles, and low-level aircraft overflights are creating an impenetrable barrier to trans-border wildlife movement. Creative solutions are needed now. northern Mexico, and the Sky Islands of southeastern Arizona Introduction were maintained. In 2000, the Wildlands Project and regional partner groups, The SIWN CP identified numerous threats to a healthy including the Sky Island Alliance, published a conservation landscape in the Sky Islands, including fragmentation of plan covering more than 10 million acres of valuable wildlife habitat by roads, fences, and subdivisions; loss or extirpation habitat in the Sky Islands ecoregion of southeast Arizona and of numerous species; loss of natural disturbance regimes such southwest New Mexico. The document, known as the Sky as fire; loss of riparian areas, streams, and watersheds; inva- Islands Wildlands Network Conservation Plan (SIWN CP), is sion by exotic species; and loss of native forests to logging based on the basic tenets of conservation biology, and a sci- and other development.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE the Sonoran Desert Has 2,000 Endemic Plant Species—More Than Anywhere Else in North America
    in the shadow of the wall: borderlands conservation hotspots on the line Borderlands Conservation Hotspot 2. Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE The Sonoran Desert has 2,000 endemic plant species—more than anywhere else in North America. hink deserts are wastelands? A visit to one of the national monuments or national wildlife refuges in the Sonoran Desert could change your mind. These borderlands are teeming with plants and animals impressively adapted to extreme conditions. T During your visit you might encounter a biologist, a volunteer or a local activist in awe of the place and dedicated to protecting it. The Sonoran Desert is so important to the natural heritage of the United States and Mexico that both countries are vested in conservation lands and programs and on a joint mission to preserve it. “A border wall,” says one conservation coalition leader, “harms our mission” (Campbell 2017). The Sonoran Desert is one of the largest intact wild areas mountains, where they find nesting cavities and swoop in the country, 100,387 square miles stretching across the between cactuses and trees to hunt lizards and other prey. southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. This Rare desert bighorn sheep stick to the steep, rocky slopes of desert is renowned for columnar cactuses like saguaro, organ isolated desert mountain ranges where they keep a watchful pipe and cardón. Lesser known is the fact that the Sonoran eye for predators. One of the most endangered mammals in Desert has more endemic plant species—2,000—than North America, Sonoran pronghorn still occasionally cross anywhere else in North America (Nabhan 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H1808
    H1808 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE April 12, 1999 RESIGNATION AS MEMBER OF into our most serious secret weapons Foreign assistance used under the COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS programs, is described as almost total. microcredit program is loaned and paid The SPEAKER laid before the House Mr. Speaker, nuclear warhead tech- back with interest and is recycled and the following resignation as a member nology might be hard for most to con- used for new loans, thus reaching an ceive, but the fact that China could of the Committee on Small Business: even greater percentage of the world's conceivably have the power to kill as poor. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, many as seven million Americans with HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Microcredit is empowerment. It is a Washington, DC, March 25, 1999. one missile is something that I think tool which builds upon the human spir- Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, everyone can visualize. it. It is the U.S. helping others to help Speaker, House of Representatives, This Chinese espionage has gone on themselves. Microcredit is action in Washington, DC. far too long. I urge the Security Coun- support of our humanitarian instincts DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Last week I was ap- cil to release the Cox report because and objectives. pointed to the Committee on Government this administration needs to stand up I support this program, and when the Reform. As a result of this appointment, I and take responsibility for release of bill comes to the floor, H.R. 1143, I ask hereby resign as a member of the Committee this Top Secret technology, and the that my colleagues give their strong on Small Business.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • The Wildlands Project Outside North America
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PDXScholar Portland State University PDXScholar Political Science Faculty Publications and Political Science Presentations 2003 The iW ldlands Project Outside North America David Johns Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/polisci_fac Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, and the Political Science Commons Citation Details Johns, David. The iW ldlands Project Outside North America. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-27. 2003 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wildlands Project Outside North America David M. Johns Abstract—The Wildlands Project seeks to create a connected greatly by the loss of connectivity. The legal boundaries of system of protected areas across North America that will ensure the protected areas were becoming actual boundaries as devel- survival of all native species, including top predators and wide- opment and conversion consumed intervening unprotected ranging species, in the context of fully functioning ecosystems. Core wildlands. These actual boundaries were biologically inad- protected areas are designated based on the biological needs of key equate to sustain species and processes over the long haul, species and the requirements of critical ecological processes. To even within the biggest islands like Yellowstone National work they must have, or will be restored to have, those attributes Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1711-E AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general
    [Show full text]
  • Newsmac Spring 2020
    NewsMAC Spring 2020 NewsMAC Newsletter of the New Mexico Archeological Council P.O. Box 25691 Albuquerque, NM 87125 NewsMAC Spring 2020 (2020-1) Contents PRESIDENT’S WELCOME 1 EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION 2 PROGRESS UPDATE: ANCESTRAL PUEBLO AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES PROJECT 3 Kaitlyn E. Davis, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Colorado, Boulder RADIOCARBON DATING OF A THERMAL FEATURE AT A TIPI RING SITE AT THE 4 DEHAVEN RANCH AND PRESERVE Emily J. Brown, Aspen CRM Consulting – NMAC Grant Recipient INVESTIGATIONS ON THE BOX CANYON VILLAGE SITE (LA 4980), AN ANIMAS PHASE VILLAGE IN HIDALGO COUNTY, NM 11 Thatcher A. Rogers, University of New Mexico – NMAC Grant Recipient THE AZOTEA PEAK RING MIDDEN SURVEY: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF SUBSISTENCE AND FEASTING AROUND THE AZOTEA MESA, EDDY COUNTY, NM 16 Ryan Scott Hechler, Statistical Research, Inc. DATA RECOVERY AT SEVEN SITES SOUTH OF SANTA FE FOR NM GAS CO. Kye Miller, PaleoWest 20 SOUTH BY SOUTHWEST: ARCHAEOLOGICAL DICHOTOMIES, ORTHODOXIES, AND 21 HETERODOXIES IN THE MOGOLLON OR WERE THOSE MIGRANTS PROPERLY DOCUMENTED? Marc Thompson 28 REPORT ON 2019 NMAC FALL CONFERENCE: COLLABORATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY, INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY, AND TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES Michael Spears NMAC CONTACTS 30 NewsMAC Spring 2020 President’s Welcome Greetings all and welcome to this pandemic issue of NewsMAC. I want to say thank you to Tamara Jager Stewart for volunteering to fill our newsletter editor vacancy this year, and working with our NMAC Past President Kye Miller to get this issue out to the membership during this busy and stressful time for all of us. I hope everyone is healthy and safe, and dealing well with the challenges of teleworking, videoconferencing, and Zoom-meeting fatigue—or the even greater challenges of safely conducting fieldwork during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Keystone Peak Prescribed Burn Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-AZ-G020-2015-0009-EA 1 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Decision to be Made .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Conformance with Land Use Plan .......................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.1 Internal Scoping ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.2 External Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.5.3 Issues Identified ................................................................................................................................ 12 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................
    [Show full text]