Local Resident's Submissions to the Redbridge Electoral Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local resident’s submissions to the Redbridge electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. - & & "(( ..6 ! " #$$%&' () " Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: Sent: 15 August 2016 11:59 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal Dear Commission, my husband and I live in Granville Road, South Woodford and we’ve been notified about the Draft Redbridge Proposals to change the Ward boundaries in Redbridge. We don’t agree with your proposals. We specifically object to making a large part of South Woodford into Wanstead Village. South Woodford residents live on both sides of Chigwell Road: their nearest tube station is South Woodford and they use the shops in George Lane and the High Road. It looks as though you’ve split some of the individual streets themselves so that some residents live in South Woodford and some live in Wanstead Village which makes no sense at all. From our point of view we would be very unhappy if we were part of the Wanstead Village ward and not South Woodford as we don’t use Wanstead tube station and we don’t shop in Wanstead. We totally agree with the proposal put forward by the Lib Dem Councillors – please see map below. 25 - & & "(( .7 ! " #$$%&' () " Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 -----Original Message----- From: Alan Bailey Sent: 12 August 2016 15:14 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal Dear Sir Please look at the proposals from Roding ward councillors concerning changes to ward boundaries in Redbridge. I feel these are a better fit for our area than the present proposals. Kind Regards Alan Bailey 28 8/23/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Redbridge London Borough Personal Details: Name: Elisa Brady Email: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Wanstead Park ward should include · St Mary’s Avenue (West side) · Overton Drive (North side west from St Mary’s)) · Draycot Road · Seagry Road · Felstead Road · Tennyson Avenue · Blake Hall Road (North of Overton Drive) · Woodcote Road · Selsdon Road The A12 is the natural boundary. Odd the proposed plan is to divide the community. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informedrepresentation/8724 1/1 7/13/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Redbridge London Borough P ersonal Details: Nam e: Owen Branley E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Owen Branley Comment text: The primary purpose of the Wanstead Tunnel was to avoid splitting Wanstead into north and south. The Commission have attempted to undo that achievement by splitting Wanstead wards into east and west, i.e. village and park. The boundary should be on Redbridge Lane West from Eastern Avenue to St Mary's Avenue. Furthermore Charlie Brown's magic roundabout does not have that village atmosphere that we cherish so much as it's more like spaghetti junction. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8558 1/1 - & ..5 ! " #$$%&' () " Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: Geoff Brockett Sent: 14 August 2016 10:10 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal Regarding the proposed new ward boundaries for Redbridge, I don’t feel that your proposals group the area in which I live with the most logical surrounding areas. Whilst I do use Wanstead High Street on occasions, the area of South Woodford to the east of Chigwell Road is much more closely linked with the rest of South Woodford. I would suggest that a better area would cover roughly the whole of the E18 postcode area to the south of the A406. Regards Geoff Brockett 22 ' ( ( )$$ * ! " ) - - .- - %&&- +(- # $- , ) Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sent: 17 August 2016 19:22 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation%20response%3A%20%20Redbridge%20Borough%20Draft%20Proposal I am commenting on the draft Redbridge Proposal for the new boundaries. I do not agree with this proposal and would suggest that the view of the Liberal democrats is much more in keeping with the area. I believe we should keep the South Woodford area together as their draft plan proposal. I hope you will take my view into consideration. Regards. Mrs. Margaret Bye, 6 7/13/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Redbridge London Borough P ersonal Details: Nam e: Philip Carnelley E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: I currently live in Wanstead Ward which is an amalgamation of two areas that seem quite distinct, while near neighbours in 'our area' are in a different ward (Snaresbrook). The new boundaries proposed for Wanstead Village and Snaresbrook are eminently sensible, much closer to the actuality of natural boundaries. Am all in favour. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8571 1/1 ' ( ( )$$ */ ! " ) %&&+(# $, ) Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: DAVID CARRUTHERS Sent: 17 August 2016 21:51 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal I am commenting on the draft Redbridge proposals. In our opinion, the proposal to extend "Wanstead Village" up the west side of Hermon Hill/Chigwell Road all the way to Charlie Brown's roundabout is not appropriate. The Northern section of this area where we live (in Onslow Gardens) is clearly part of South Woodford. We, like all the residents in this area, use South Woodford station and the shops in George Lane and the High Road which are much closer to us. We rarely visit Wanstead and do not agree that this area should be appended to Wanstead which we feel is completely different in character and presume is unlikely to be subject to the same issues as those that arise in South Woodford. David & Kath Carruthers 7 ! " # $%&&! ‐‐ Jonathan Ashby Review Assistant LGBCE From: Rich Clare Sent: 19 August 2016 01:24 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Draft Redbridge comments I live on Lorne Gardens and I think most of my neighbours think of themselves as belonging to Wanstead and I look forward to the creation of a Wanstead village ward, but I feel strongly that the roads north of Nightingale School (Onslow Gardens, Cadogan Gardens, Southview Drive, Hermon Hill etc) are part of South Woodford, not Wanstead, and would do better put together with the rest of South Woodford. Snaresbrook would be a better fit with Wanstead, as the high street and surrounding areas blend together quite smoothly, so perhaps a Snaresbrook and Wanstead ward could be created? Rich Clare 1 - & ..4 ! " #$$%&' () " Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 -----Original Message----- From: David Crighton Sent: 12 August 2016 20:38 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal Keep Onslow gardens as South Woodford. Regards. David Crighton. 12 ! " #$$%&' () " From: tricia darvell Sent: 16 August 2016 07:58 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Consultation response: Redbridge Borough Draft Proposal Dear Sir/Madam, Please see the image below with the “Our View” divide for new wards suggested by The South Woodfrod Society. As a resident in the area, , I also feel this makes much more sense than that currently proposed by the Commission. kindest Regards Tricia Darvell 5 ' ( ( )$$ /0/ ! " +& ' )(" &$&1" & Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: Nicole Davidoff Sent: 17 August 2016 13:58 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Boundary proposals: South Woodford/Wanstead Dear Sirs As a resident of South Woodford, I would like to comment on the new boundary proposals. The proposed change has little – or, indeed, no bearing on reality. Most residents of South View Drive and the surrounding area consider themselves as part of South Woodford, travel from George Lane bus stops and South Woodford tube station (not from Wanstead!), shop in George Lane (not on Wanstead High Street!). And to artificially extend Wanstead as far north as Charlie Brown's Roundabout will seem ridiculous. In view of the above, Hermon Hill/Chigwell Road is not an appropriate boundary. A much better layout , and one much more in keeping with residents' habits and preferences, is as presented the on the right hand side of the attached picture. Please reconsider your proposal. Yours sincerely Nicole Davidoff 9 Laura Taylor From: reviews Sent: 23 August 2016 09:12 To: Laura Taylor Subject: FW: Boundary review for Redbridge Attachments: Final Recommendations on changes to the ward boundaries in LB Redbridge 2 (1).docx -- Jonathan Ashby Review Assistant LGBCE From: Gregor Eglin Sent: 22 August 201 To: reviews <reviews Subject: Boundary review for Redbridge The Review Officer (Redbridge) Local Government Boundary Commission for England Dear Madam / Sir, Please find attached our views on the Redbridge Boundary Review. Yours Faithfully Gregor Eglin John Drew 1 22nd. August 2016 The Review Officer (Redbridge) Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor Millbank Towers Millbank London SW1P 4QP reviewselgbce.org.uk Dear Madam / Sir Response to the Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for the London Borough of Redbridge We are residents of the London Borough of Redbridge living in Snaresbrook Ward. We have a degree of concern as to the draft arrangements for the West of the Borough. While the arrangements for the North, South and East of the Borough follow closely the recommendations of the Council, the recommendations for the West do not. In the rest of the Borough the current ward structure is maintained with some adjustments to boundaries. A new two‐member ward is created to take account of population growth in the South of the Borough.