Timpanogos Cave National Monument Rockfall Mitigation Measures Ut Fltp Tica 10(992)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Timpanogos Cave National Monument Rockfall Mitigation Measures Ut Fltp Tica 10(992) TIMPANOGOS CAVE NATIONAL MONUMENT ROCKFALL MITIGATION MEASURES UT FLTP TICA 10(992) GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT Report # UT-PX-TICA-13-01 Geotechnical Services Branch July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scope of Rockfall Hazard Evaluation ....................................................................... 1 1.2 Previous Reports and Investigations ......................................................................... 2 2.0 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY ........................................................................................... 3 2.1 Site Geology ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Regional and Local Seismic Setting ........................................................................... 3 2.3 Geologic Hazards ........................................................................................................ 4 2.4 NPS Geologic Hazard Policy ...................................................................................... 5 3.0 PROCEDURES AND RESULTS .......................................................................................... 7 3.1 Findings ........................................................................................................................ 7 4.0 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 12 4.1 Rockfall Analysis ....................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Rockfall Mitigation Recommendations ................................................................... 16 4.3 Rock Scaling Recommendations .............................................................................. 17 4.4 Rockfall Hazard Rating System Assessment .......................................................... 17 4.5 Construction Considerations ................................................................................... 19 5.0 DISCLAIMER/LIMITATIONS CLAUSE ......................................................................... 20 6.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 21 APPENDICES Appendix A – Figures Appendix B – NPS Geologic Hazards Management Policy Appendix C – Rockfall Mitigation Methods Appendix D – Rockfall Analysis Data Appendix E – Rockfall Fence Details Appendix F - Special Contract Requirements Appendix G – Photos Page i 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a visual reconnaissance and provides geotechnical recommendations to support the development of a rockfall hazard evaluation and associated mitigation measures within the Timpanogos Cave National Monument (TICA). TICA is located within the American Fork Canyon along Utah State Highway (SH) 92, approximately 3 miles east of Highland, Utah in Utah County. The main resource at the National Monument is the cave system providing access to Hanson Cave, Middle Cave, and Timpanogos Cave. To reach the cave, visitors must hike the strenuous, 1.5-mile-long cave trail, which rises steeply just over 1,000 feet. The Visitor Center and caves are open from late-May to late-September. A Project Vicinity Map and Project Location Map are presented in Appendix A. Regular rockfall events within the park coupled with seasonal visitation emphasizes the need for proactive, systematic evaluation of natural slope hazards. For example, rock scaling efforts are conducted by Park staff on an annual basis on the readily accessible slopes within the Park. In addition, the United State Geological Survey (USGS) has conducted several rockfall hazard assessments of specific locations within the Park, as well as locations within American Fork Canyon. To support ongoing efforts to improve the safety and performance of unstable natural slopes within the Park, this project focused on the following objectives: 1. Relate slope hazards and qualified risks with broader efforts to identify rockfall hazards within the Park; 2. Recommend a range of rockfall hazard mitigation strategies suited to Park resource management objectives and the effective use of maintenance resources, and apply these strategies toward site-specific hazard mitigation recommendations; and 3. Frame identified rockfall hazards and risks within the assest management architecture, emphasizing the need to treat specific rockfall hazard locations as assets requiring proactive, life-cycle type management. This study provides an assessment and prioritization of rockfall hazards for unstable natural slopes adjacent to the current location of the TICA Visitor Center and along the cave access trail. Recommended mitigation measures, and strategies for effectively deploying these measures, are provided along with order-of-magnitude cost estimates for general mitigation measures. 1.1 Scope of Rockfall Hazard Evaluation The rockfall hazard evaluation is focused on the current location of the TICA Visitor Center, located at the base of near-vertical rock cliffs comprised of highly fractured quartzite bedrock. The cliffs begin approximately 150 feet from the Visitor Center and extend to more than 600 feet in height. A talus slope is located below the cliffs and extends downslope to the Visitor Center. The talus slope is approximately 100-feet-high with an overall slope ratio of 1V:1H. Rockfall debris from the cliffs generally reach the vicinity of the Visitor Center and have occasionally impacted and penetrated the roof of the Page 1 Visitor Center. A 6-foot-high chain link fence is currently located between the toe of the talus slope and the Visitor Center. The fence has been damaged and is retaining material from numerous rockfall events. TICA is currently completing final design plans to move the Visitor Center away from these cliffs and increase parking capacity. The proposed location for the Visitor Center is at the east end of the existing parking lot. Relocating the Visitor Center will distance the structure from the runout zone of the active talus slope; thereby, providing greater protection from rockfall impacts. Relocation plans also include minor realignment of SH 92 in the vicinity of the Visitor Center to accommodate increased parking capacity. While the proposed site is better protected from rockfalls, the demolition and removal of the existing Visitor Center and associated structures increases the rockfall hazard to the proposed parking area. As a result, TICA has requested technical assistance with the evaluation of rockfall hazards and development of rockfall protection measures. A cursory hazard evaluation was also conducted of natural slopes along the length of the cave trail. Lower portions of the cave trail cross beneath near vertical cliffs comprised of intensely fractured Mutual Quartzite. Rocks falling from these cliffs commonly reach the vicinity of, or impact, the Visitor Center. Upper portions of the trail abut Deseret Limestone, which at this location consist of a sequence of fractured, interbedded limestones, dolomites, and quartzites. Steep gullies in the cliffs between the cave entrance and exit have been the site of numerous rockfalls. These rockfalls resulted in one fatality in 1933 and several near misses, which has prompted the construction of suspended, weighted fences to attenuate rockfall, as well as rockfall shelters at the cave entrance and exit in 1976. During the summer months, thousands of visitors per day access the trail and visit the cave system. Areas along the trail with known, significant rockfall hazards are marked with a red stripe. Trail users are advised to be cautious and not stop to rest in these areas. 1.2 Previous Reports and Investigations Geotechnical personnel from CFLHD were originally consulted for technical expertise on this project in August 2009. A trip report was prepared during the initial consultation which provided preliminary geotechnical recommendations on a rockfall catchment system. The recommendations were based on a visual inspection and estimates of rock slope geometry and characteristics. Page 2 2.0 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY American Fork Canyon is a deeply incised canyon that transects the Wasatch Mountain Range in central Utah. Specifically, the Canyon is within the deeply dissected Wasatch Front of northern Utah. The Wasatch Range is characterized by rugged mountain faces and narrow, east-west trending, steep sided canyons. Rapid regional uplift has caused many of the streams that drain the west side of the Wasatch Front to erode headward, carving back canyons, until they reach the mountain crests. The Wasatch Range is an uplifted block that extends approximately 120 miles. The range is 8- to 16-miles-wide and is bounded on the west by the scarp of the seismically active Wasatch Front. The Wasatch Front rises dramatically from the valley floor and separates the geologic province of the Basin and Range to the west from the Middle Rocky Mountain province to the east. The Wasatch range is geologically complex and is characterized by the normal faults along which the Basin and Range deformation occurred. There are many parallel ranges throughout the Timpanogos region due to the extensional tectonics pulling the crust apart in an east-west oriented pattern. Many westward flowing, high gradient, parallel streams dissect the Wasatch Front into isolated peaks separated by deep, narrow
Recommended publications
  • The Purcell Lava Glacier National Park, Montana
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The Purcell Lava Glacier National Park, Montana by Robert G. McGimsey 1 Open-File Report 85-0543 1985 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editoral standards and stratigraphic nomenclature Denver, Colorado CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES........................................................... vii ABSTRACT................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................................... 2 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION..................................................... 3 Purpose of Investigation....................................... 3 Location and Geologic Setting.................................. 3 Previous Work.................................................. 4 Field and Laboratory Methods................................... 5 II. DIVISION AND DESCRIPTION OF FACIES............................... 6 Introduction................................................... 6 Pillow Lava Facies............................................. 6 Two-Dimensional Pillow Exposures............................. 7 Three-Dimensional Pillow Exposures........................... 9 Isolated- and Broken-Pillow Breccia.......................... 9 Coalesced Pillows and the Upper Contact...................... 10 Hyaloclastite Breccia........................................ 10 Intercalated Sediment.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfall Triggering by Cyclic Thermal Stressing of Exfoliation Fractures
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 28 MARCH 2016 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2686 Rockfall triggering by cyclic thermal stressing of exfoliation fractures Brian D. Collins1* and Greg M. Stock2 Exfoliation of rock deteriorates clis through the formation and subsequent opening of fractures, which in turn can lead to potentially hazardous rockfalls. Although a number of mechanisms are known to trigger rockfalls, many rockfalls occur during periods when likely triggers such as precipitation, seismic activity and freezing conditions are absent. It has been suggested that these enigmatic rockfalls may occur due to solar heating of rock surfaces, which can cause outward expansion. Here we use data from 3.5 years of field monitoring of an exfoliating granite cli in Yosemite National Park in California, USA, to assess the magnitude and temporal pattern of thermally induced rock deformation. From a thermodynamic analysis, we find that daily, seasonal and annual temperature variations are sucient to drive cyclic and cumulative opening of fractures. Application of fracture theory suggests that these changes can lead to further fracture propagation and the consequent detachment of rock. Our data indicate that the warmest times of the day and year are particularly conducive to triggering rockfalls, and that cyclic thermal forcing may enhance the ecacy of other, more typical rockfall triggers. ockfalls are common and hazardous in steep terrains around thermally induced deformation occurs in unstable rock masses, the world1–4, and are primary agents of landscape erosion whether by long-term creep of detached blocks or by short-term in many environments4–8. In exfoliating landscapes (Fig. 1a), fracture propagation in competent rock27–30.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Fracture Influences on Geomorphic Process and Form Across
    1 Synthesis of Fracture Influences on Geomorphic Process and Form Across 2 Process Domains and Scales 3 4 Daniel N. Scott1*, Ellen E. Wohl1 5 1Colorado State University, Department of Geosciences, 1482 Campus Delivery, Fort 6 Collins, CO 80523 7 8 *corresponding author: [email protected] 9 10 Abstract 11 Fractures are discontinuities in rock that can be exploited by erosion. Fractures 12 regulate cohesion, profoundly affecting the rate, style, and location of Earth surface 13 processes. By modulating the spatial distribution of erodibility, fractures can focus 14 erosion and set the shape of features from scales of fluvial bedforms to fjords. Although 15 early investigation focused on fractures as features that influence the orientation and 16 location of landforms, recent work has started to discern the mechanisms by which 17 fractures influence the erodibility of bedrock. As numerical modeling and field 18 measurement techniques improve, it is rapidly becoming feasible to determine how 19 fractures influence geomorphic processes, as opposed to when or where. However, 20 progress is hampered by a lack of coordination across scales and process domains. We 21 review studies from hillslope, glacial, fluvial, and coastal domains from the scale of 22 reaches and outcrops to entire landscapes. We then synthesize this work to highlight 23 similarities across domains and scales as well as suggest knowledge gaps, 24 opportunities, and methodological challenges that need to be solved. By integrating 25 knowledge across domains and scales, we present a more holistic conceptualization of 26 fracture influences on geomorphic processes. This conceptualization enables a more 27 unified framework for future investigation into fracture influences on Earth surface 28 dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Texascaver 2005-12-01.Pdf
    Haby Cave, also known as Cave of the Lakes, was new to Texas cavers in October 1965 when Glenda Kunath posed for this picture. Unfortunately, the cave was soon closed (some say the entrance has been permanently closed with a bulldozer) and few people have been privileged to visit this cave. A cropped black and white conversion of this photo appeared on the cover of the February 1966 Texas Caver. Carl Kunath. About the cover: This special issue features selected covers from the last 50 years of the Texas Caver. We looked at every issue (all 500 ± of them) and tried to choose something representative of the Caver from each decade. Unfortunately, some of the finest photographs were not well printed originally and to scan and reprint those didn’t seem like a good idea. We did the best we could with the material available. February 1956: Artwork by Bill Helmer. Dittoed on yellow paper. See more of Bill’s cartoon skills elsewhere in this issue. June 1966: Carl Kunath made this picture of the famed Butterfly at Caverns of Sonora with only the light from a flashlight. It may be the most-photographed feature in a Texas cave. The right wing was vandalized in 2006. September 1971: Ronnie Fieseler made this classic picture of Jon Everage during the project to gate the lower entrance of Midnight Cave. December 1985: Allan Cobb captured (top to bottom) Kurt Menking, Randy Waters, Bob Cowell, Joe Ivy, and Carl Ponebshek at the newly completed entrance to Honey Creek Cave. March 1993: James Jasek made this nice view in Oriente Milestone Molasses Bat Cave, one of Texas’ rarely visited caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 15 Weathering WEATHERING the Dynamic Earth
    Module 15 Weathering WEATHERING The Dynamic Earth • Earth is very dynamic • Temperature (T) and pressure (P) increase with increasing depth below Earth’s surface • Tectonic activity uplifts rocks formed at higher T and P deep below Earth’s surface to regions of lower T and P closer to the surface • At the lower T and P at or near Earth’s surface, the minerals composing the uplifted rocks: • Are unstable • Are constantly exposed to agents of weathering, such as O2, acidic H2O, rain, wind, ice, etc. • Are thus relentlessly destroyed by weathering, erosion, and mass wasting Weathering Rocks Cycle All rocks exposed Formation of Metamorphicat earth’sRocks surface undergo… Uplift and exposure WEATHERING Weathering, Erosion, and Transportation • Weathering • The group of processes that change rock at or near Earth’s surface • Erosion • The removal of rock particles from their source by flowing water, wind, or glacial ice • Transportation • The movement of eroded particles by flowing water, wind, or glacial ice WEATHERING Types of Weathering ❑ Chemical weathering • Changes the chemical composition of rocks by removing and/or adding ions ❑ Mechanical weathering • Breaks rocks into smaller pieces without changing their composition Chemical Weathering ❑ Chemical weathering removes and/or adds ions by dissolution, hydrolysis, and oxidation ❑ Dissolution • Is removal soluble ions Na+, K+, Ca 2+, Mg 2+, 2+ Fe , SiO2 • Is enhanced by acids: H2CO3, H2SO4, HNO3, and HCl ❑ Hydrolysis is addition of water as the OH- ion • Forms clays from olivine, augite,
    [Show full text]
  • Granitic Flatrocks Description
    GRANITIC FLATROCKS Concept: Granitic Flatrocks are communities occurring on nearly level outcrops of exfoliating granitic rock in the eastern and central Piedmont. The pavement-like surfaces largely lack crevices or other sites for deep rooting by plants. The individual communities represent different major stages of primary succession: barely vegetated bedrock, shallow soil with herbaceous vegetation, and continuous shallow soil capable of supporting xerophytic woodland trees. Distinguishing Features: The Granitic Flatrock theme is distinguished by naturally sparse, herbaceous, or stunted woodland vegetation associated with flat-lying exfoliated granitic rock at or near the surface. The gentle slope, which changes soil development, as well as differing climate and regional flora, separate Granitic Flatrocks from the Low Elevation Granitic Dome communities of the foothills and Mountain Region. The edge of the Granitic Flatrocks theme occurs where the distinctive xerophytic vegetation gives way to more typical forest communities. Synonyms: Granite flatrock, granite outcrop, pavement (general usage). Sites: Sites are unfractured outcrops of exfoliating granite, adamellite, syenite, or related igneous rocks, level or gently sloping, at about the same elevation as the surrounding land. Rock may be extensive at the surface or may be covered with a shallow layer of soil. Rock surfaces may have shallow weathering pits, large or small loose rock fragments, and occasionally larger loose slabs of rock but have extensive pavement-like surfaces. Flatrocks may be on upland ridges or may be exposed on gentle slopes above streams. In a few examples, they extend to the banks of streams that flow over the bedrock. Soils: Soils consist of sandy-textured partially weathered rock and accumulated organic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Use of the Giant Sequoia Groves in Yosemite National Park: a Report to Save-The-Redwoods League
    Bat Use of the Giant Sequoia Groves in Yosemite National Park: A Report to Save-the-Redwoods League Elizabeth D. Pierson, William E. Rainey, and Leslie S. Chow Recommended Citation: Pierson, Elizabeth D., Rainey, William E. and Leslie S. Chow. 2006. Bat use of the giant sequoia groves in Yosemite National Park: A report to Save-the-Redwoods League. This report was produced with support from Save-the-Redwoods League. The views and findings contained within are those of the researchers and not necessarily those of Save-the-Redwoods League. Copyright is owned by Save-the-Redwoods League. Through the license terms of this work you are free to copy, distribute and display the work under the following conditions: Attribution: you must attribute the work to the Elizabeth D. Pierson, William E. Rainey, Leslie S. Chow, and Save-the- Redwoods League. Noncommercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. For any reuse or distribution, you must include the above license terms of this work. © Save-the-Redwoods League. Permission required for uses with commercial, non-educational, or non-editorial purposes. 1 BAT USE OF THE GIANT SEQUOIA GROVES IN YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK Prepared by: Elizabeth D. Pierson, William E. Rainey, and Leslie S. Chow Prepared for: The Yosemite Fund 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 1104 San Francisco, CA 94104 and Yosemite National Park Yosemite Field Station U. S. Geological Survey P.O. Box 700 El Portal, CA 95318 January 2006 Pierson et al. Bat Use of Giant Sequoia Groves in Yosemite National Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fourteen of the 18 species known to occur in Yosemite National Park were detected in the giant sequoia groves (eight by capture, and six by acoustic records).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Valley Valley Yosemite F
    Excerpt from Geologic Trips, Sierra Nevada by Ted Konigsmark ISBN 0-9661316-5-7 GeoPress All rights reserved. No part ofthis book may be reproduced without written permission, except for critical articles or reviews. For other geologic trips see: www.geologictrips.com 228 ek re C - Trip 7. Creek Yosemite ya Basket Dome na S YOSEMITE VALLEY Yosemite Village Te S 1 Mile Quarter Ahwahnee Domes Hotel SWashington Column r e v i R Camp Curry M d e r e c rc e d e R M i v e Vernal Fall Liberty Cap r S Big Fla t Rd. Dr Dr. 120 side e h id Nevada Fall Valley ort ths Sentinel Dome S N ou S 140 View SWashburn Point © Rd. SCathedral Spire 41 Wawona STaft Point Bridalveil Fall Tunnel Bridalveil Moraine View G B l El Capitan r a id a c i lv e Three Brothers e r i l P C r o Yosemite Falls e i e n k t R Royal Arches d . Valley wall Half Dome Little Yosemite Valley Granitic rocks, upland Glacier Point - 229 Trip 7 YOSEMITE VALLEY A Sculpture in Granite The spectacular scenery in Yosemite Valley didn’t just happen. Creation of the cliffs, waterfalls, spires, columns, arches, and domes of Yosemite required just the right type of rock and the right combination of geologic tools to shape the rock. The granitic rocks of the Sierra Nevada batholith were the perfect rocks to use in the sculpture of the valley. Granite is known for its hardness, beauty and enduring qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN MASTIFF BAT Eumops Perotis
    Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California, Bolster, B.C., Ed., 1998 66 Western mastiff bat, Eumops perotis Elizabeth D. Pierson & William E. Rainey Description: Eumops perotis is one of four molossids which occurs in California. The molossids are distinguished from all other bat species by the presence of a “free-tail,” which extends visibly beyond the edge of the interfemoral (=tail) membrane. E. perotis is distinguished from the other molossids on the basis of size. It is by far the largest bat species found in California. It has a wingspan of 53 to 56 cm, a forearm of 75-83 mm, and an adult weight of 60-72 g. The species with which it could most readily be confused is Nyctinomops macrotis, another molossid, with a forearm of 58-64 mm. Both have large bonnet-like ears, which extend forward over the eyes and are connected at the midline. Taxonomic Remarks: E. perotis is in the family Molossidae. The California form of E. perotis was first described by Merriam (1890), and has been recognized as the subspecies E. p. californicus since 1932 (Sanborn 1932). The type locality is Alhambra, Los Angeles County. There are nine species currently recognized in the genus Eumops (auripendulus, bonariensis, dabbenei, glaucinus, hansae, maurus, perotis, trumbulli, and underwoodi), and two subspecies of E. perotis (californicus and perotis)(Eger 1977). Most species have their centers of distribution in Mexico, Central and/or South America; three (glaucinus, underwoodi, and perotis) occur in the southern United States; only E. perotis californicus occurs in California, with the other subspecies, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Rates and Processes from Bega Valley to Arnhem Land
    Eroding Australia: rates and processes from Bega Valley to Arnhem Land ARJUN M. HEIMSATH1*, JOHN CHAPPELL2 & KEITH FIFIELD3 1School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA 2Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 3Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: We report erosion rates determined from in situ produced cosmogenic 10Be across a spectrum of Australian climatic zones, from the soil-mantled SE Australian escarpment through semi-arid bedrock ranges of southern and central Australia, to soil-mantled ridges at a monsoonal tropical site near the Arnhem escarpment. Climate has a major effect on the balance between erosion and transport and also on erosion rate: the highest rates, averaging 35 m Ma21, were from soil-mantled, transport-limited spurs in the humid temperate region around the base of the SE escarpment; the lowest, averaging about 1.5 m Ma21, were from the steep, weathering- limited, rocky slopes of Kings Canyon and Mt Sonder in semi-arid central Australia. Between these extremes, other factors come into play including rock-type, slope, and recruitment of vegetation. We measured intermediate average erosion rates from rocky slopes in the semi-arid Flinders and MacDonnell ranges, and from soil-mantled sites at both semi-arid Tyler Pass in central Australia and the tropical monsoonal site. At soil-mantled sites in both the SE and tropical north, soil production generally declines exponentially with increasing soil thickness, although at the tropical site this relationship does not persist under thin soil thicknesses and the relationship here is ‘humped’.
    [Show full text]
  • MRP DEIS Volume 2
    Analysis Topics: Natural Resources Geology, Geohazards, and Soils ANALYSIS TOPICS: NATURAL RESOURCES Geology, Geohazards, and Soils Affected Environment Regulatory Framework The National Park Service (NPS) has several guiding principles with respect to the management of geologic resources. Geologic resources include geologic processes, shorelines, hazards, and unique geologic features. These guidelines are specified in the NPS Management Policies 2006. That document specifies that the NPS will, at a minimum: (1) assess the impacts of natural processes and human activities on geologic resources, (2) maintain and restore the integrity of existing geologic resources, (3) integrate geologic resource management into NPS operations and planning, and (4) interpret geologic resources for park visitors (NPS 2006a, section 4.8.1, 53). With a few exceptions, the management policies generally direct the NPS to allow natural geologic processes to proceed unimpeded; facilitate the continuance of natural shoreline processes; and protect geologic resources from human-induced impacts while minimizing the potential impacts of geohazards on visitors, staff, and developed areas (NPS 2006a). Yosemite Valley Geologic Hazard Guidelines Summary The 2012 Yosemite Valley Geologic Hazard Guidelines was developed by the NPS in response to advances in the scientific understanding of rock fall mechanisms, frequency and magnitude, and the recent release of a quantitative rock-fall hazard and risk assessment for Yosemite Valley (Stock et al. 2012b). This recently released study used a quantitative approach to establish a rock fall hazard line within Yosemite Valley, which was drawn to encompass 90 percent of the boulders that have fallen from the valley walls beyond the base of the talus (the zone of boulder accumulation).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Guidebook for Quaternary and Cretaceous Geology of West-Central Minnesota and Adjoining South Dakota
    FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK FOR QUATERNARY AND CRETACEOUS GEOLOGY OF WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA AND ADJOINING SOUTH DAKOTA PREPARED FOR THE 21 ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, NORTH-CENTRAL SECTION ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, 1987 l5i1 MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 GUIDEBOOK SERIES NO. 16 ISSN 0192-6268 MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Priscilla C. Grew, Director FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK FOR QUATERNARY AND CRETACEOUS GEOLOGY OF WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA AND ADJOINING SOUTH DAKOTA N.H. Balaban, Editor PREPARED FOR THE 21ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, NORTH-CENTRAL SECTION St. Paul, Minnesota, 1987 CONTENTS Page GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PLEISTOCENE GLACIAL GEOLOGY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA, Barry Goldstein CRETACEOUS ROCKS ON THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE WESTERN INTERIOR SEAWAY: A FIELD GUIDE FOR WESTERN MINNESOTA AND EASTERN SOUTH DAKOTA, George W. Shurr, Jay P. Gilbertson, Richard H. Hammond, Dale R. Setterholm, and Peter M. Whelan 47 The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, national origin, handicap, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation. iii GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PLEISTOCENE GLACIAL GEOLOGY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA by Barry Goldstein Geology Department, University of Puget Sound Tacoma, WA 98416 With contributions from: Howard Mooers, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minne­ sota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Kerry Keen, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Art Norton, Star Route, Number 12, Warba, MN 55793 Stan Chernicoff, Geology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 INTRODUCTION For nearly a century, definition of the sequence of glaciation in Minnesota has been hampered by the great complexity of the deposits.
    [Show full text]