DOCSLIB.ORG

Eagle Forum's Mission Is to Enable Conservative and Pro-Family Men

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eagle Forum's Mission Is to Enable Conservative and Pro-Family Men 2015 Eagle Forum’s mission is to enable conservative and pro-family men and women to participate in the process of self-government and public policymaking so that America will continue to be a land of individual liberty,respect for family integrity, public and private virtue,national independence, constitutional government, and private enterprise.We honor Eagle Forum’s citizen volunteers for their dedicated work at every level of government since 1972. Phyllis Schlafly ALABAMA Tom & Dottie Parker, 1986 Dr. Nicholas Hagan, 1980 Joanne McKinney, 1988 Karen Holgate, 1997 Caroline Aderholt, 1995 Katharine Patton, 2010 Mary Lou Hagen, 1998 Rachel McKinney, 1973 Lucile Hosmer, 1974 ^ Cong. Robert Aderholt, 2004 Hon. Arthur Payne, 1991 Carolyn Hastings, 2002 Margaret Mercer, 2002 Julia Becker Howell, 1983 Yvonne Agee, 1995 Betty Peters, 1999 Cong. J.D. Hayworth, 1995 Mary Ann Miller, 1981 Dorothy Hughes, 1985 Bobbie Ames, 1978 Carolyn Pitman, 1987 Charlie Hendrix, 2007 Rep. Randy Minton, 2000 Sharon Hughes, 2002 Norris Anderson, 1995 Mimi Pruet, 1988 Barbara Jeffries, 1979 Sherrie Mitchell, 1993 Cong. Duncan Hunter, 2007 Vesta Ard, 1988 Dr. Max Rafferty, 1981 ^ Emmy Lou Johnson, 2002 Sen. W. D. Bill Moore, 1982 Dr. David Isaacs, 2001 Sen. Bill Armistead, 1999 Charlotte Railey, 1979 ^ Sen. Karen Johnson, 1988 Maxine Murphy, 1975 Betty Johnson, 1978 Kay Bakke, 1980 Kitty Reickenback, 1977 ^ Rep. Leslie Johnson, 1988 Cecily Norman, 1991 Prof. Phillip E. Johnson, 1999 Gwen Baldwin, 1980 Becky Robertson, 1991 Rep. Lillian Jordan, 1981 ^ Carol O’Dea, 1989 Jacqueline Kasun, 1993 ^ Betsy Bancroft, 1981 Sarah Robertson, 1983 ^ Rep. Sylvia Laughter, 2003 Doris Reed, 2005 Phyllis Ketcham, 1977 Agnes Bazemore, 1978 Dr. Douglas Sager, 1990 Sandy Leonard, 1980 Bob Reely, 1990 Sharon Kientz, 2005 Sen. Scott Beason, 2008 Rep. Allen Sanderson, 1995 Ron Ludders, 2011 Charlann Reely, 1979 Orlean Koehle, 2000 Betty Beck, 1980 Jean Saunders, 1978 ^ Dinah Lundell, 1996 Susan Reynolds, 1984 Gary & Carol Kreep, 1994 Stephanie Bell, 1989 J. Paul Scott, 1995 ^ Linda Mace, 1982 Mary Riley, 1973 Chris & Aimay Krive Family, 2003 Sen. Jack Biddle, 1999 Senator Jeff Sessions, 2006 Tony Mackelprang, 2006 Charlotte Rogers, 2002 Jean Last, 1987 Jan Bolla, 1983 Senator Richard Shelby, 2000 Nina Marlow, 2013 Judy Russell, 2001 Virginia Lavan, 1978 Betty Bostwick, 1980 Cong. Albert Lee Smith, 1982 ^ Naomi Martineau, 1981 Mary Ann Sale, 1987 Randy Lewis, 1997 Jeanne Bradford, 1994 Eunice Smith, 1974 Dinah Monahan, 1979 Dr. George Schroeder, 1980 Mae Lisonbee, 1979 Tom & Mary Anne Bradford, 2007 Olive Spann, 1973 ^ Peter Morgan, 1985 Mary Schroeder, 1979 John B. Lusk, 1983 Craig Branch, 1993 Anna Steele, 1982 Verna Nichols, 1987 Donna Schweider, 1989 Pastor John & Rynner Mann, 2009 Dee Browder, 1990 Mary Carolyn Sullivan, 1990 Pat Oldroyd, 2002 Peggy Scott, 2011 Del McLaughlin, 1985 Margaret Brown, 1992 Pam Thomason, 2003 Dr. Jane Orient, 1993 Ralph Seekins, 2006 Geoff Metcalf, 2001 Traci Brown, 2004 Peggy Tucker, 2001 Joan Payne, 1991 Joanne Siliaereau, 2015 Rita Miller, 1973 Melissa Busbin, 1994 Sen. Jabo Waggoner, 1999 Rep. Russell Pearce, 2001 Marilyn Simmons, 1977 Dr. Stan Monteith, 2010 ^ Hon. Jim Carns, 1991 Stuart Welch, 2015 Betty Perry, 1977 Sandra Singleton, 1988 Barbara Morris, 1975 Cindy Carr, 1991 Frances Wideman, 1976 Sen. Dave Petersen, 2001 Ann Skinner, 1997 Bonnie O’Neil, 1997 Don Casey, 2005 Bebe Williams, 1987 Sherri Pitman, 1979 Robert Snowden, 1975 ^ Carol Pascoe, 2002 Michael Ciamarra, 1994 Lt. Gov. Steve Windom, 1999 Charlie Powell, 2003 Annie Laurie Spencer, 1974 ^ Joan Patton, 1996 Margaret Clarke, 1996 Vickie Winstead, 1990 Cathy Ray, 2000 Steve Stephens, 2008 Roxanne Petteway, 1996 Lisa Claytor, 1991 Audrey Wright, 1981 Cong. Matt Salmon, 1994 Eleanor Sykes, 1978 Judy Plunkett, 1993 Bettye Fine Collins, 1993 Bet Wright, 1982 Rep. David Schweikert, 1994 Sen. Larry Teague, 2012 Georgiana Preskar, 2003 Chris Collins, 1974 ^ Alan Sears, 1986 Drew Terry, 2004 Alice Rampton, 1980 Bob Crittendon, 1995 ALASKA Marian Shumway, 1990 Denise Webb, 1992 Jewett Rankin, 1997 Kay Crosby, 1992 Becky Armstrong, 2002 Nancy Spreen, 1974 ^ Teresa White, 1985 Teri Reisser, 1989 Madeleine Darden, 2001 Bo Armstrong, 2000 Barbara Stailey, 1989 Rev. George Williams, 2003 Elden & Kathy Rice, 2002 Alex Davies, 1995 ^ Cheryl Clementson, 1999 Hon. Lela Steffe, 1987 Nellie Sue Wilson, 1987 Pat Riehle, 1999 Pat Day, 1990 Rep. John Coghill, 2005 Sen. Bess Stinson, 1975 ^ Ray Wilson, 2008 Jane Russell, 2001 ^ Alice DeBardeleben, 1982 ^ Ellen Dempsey, 1981 Susan Stradling, 1986 Earlene Windsor, 1981 Brad Sanborn, 1997 Admiral Jeremiah Denton, 1980 ^ Sen. Fred Dyson, 2003 Ada Thomas, 1983 Patsy Wooton, 1981 Norma Schilling, 1993 Tallie Dillard, 2009 Judy Eledge, 2014 Erleen Tilton, 1996 Julie Wright, 1990 Kristin Fay Schuiteman, 1995 Sen. Larry Dixon, 1999 Kelly Forman, 2010 Sen. Thayer Verschoor, 2004 Frances Scully, 1993 Tom Dorer, 2011 Carolyn Glover, 1980 JoAnn Walker, 1981 CALIFORNIA Eleanor Severance, 1982 Sally Douglas, 1991 Gwen Hall, 2004 Shirley Whitlock, 1979 Barbara Alby, 1989 ^ Amb. Frank Shakespeare, 1987 Claire Downey, 1994 Alyce Hanley, 1988 Wayne Whitlock, 1989 Jo Ellen & Eddie Allen, 1981 Jacqueline Simonds, 1987 Debbie Dupuy, 1990 Barbara Haney, 2015 Karen Winfield, 1980 Dana Alvey, 1992 Amber Singleton, 1989 Johnnie Edwards, 1984 Don Haase, 2009 Claudette Wolfe, 1994 Dr. Melvin Anchell, 1986 Pastor Chuck Smith, 2009 Vernessa Edwards, 1991 Therese Jones, 1986 Dana Womack, 1998 Betty Arras, 1986 Maurine Startup, 1976 ^ Pat Ellis, 2001 Debbie Joslin, 2005 Helen Young, 1981 Angela Azevedo, 2004 Carolyn Steinke, 1992 Margaret Epperson, 1980 Rep. Wes Keller, 2008 Debbie Bacigalupi, 2012 Deborah & Lou Tavares, 2011 Ellie Ficken, 1988 Rep. Mike Kelly, 2007 ARKANSAS Tahnya Ballard, 1999 Patricia Thomas, 1992 Teresa Ferguson, 2014 Joe Miller, 2013 Sen. Denny Altes, 2010 Pamela Barret, 1999 Nancy Thomson, 2000 Diane Fowler, 1990 Sue Miller, 1985 Carole Baker, 1989 Dorothy Bearss, 1984 Rachel Turicchi, 2014 Ken Freeman, 2005 Jim Minnery, 2012 Gertrude Beard, 1998 Sandee Beckers, 1992 Jean Westphal, 1995 Sen. Steve French, 1999 Jewel Nestergard, 1997 Judy Beard, 1996 Gary Bosley, 2009 Natalie Williams, 1998 Rep. Mark Gaines, 1995 Mike Pauley, 2000 Jennie Binger, 1976 Pastor Brian Brodersen, 2009 Woody and Donna Woodrum, 2010 Vivian Garrett, 1993 Virginia Phillips, 1994 Nancy Bingham, 1996 Vicki Brough, 2001 Mary & Dick Wolbert, 2006 Murfee Gewin, 1998 Donna Trontvet, 1983 Cecile Bledsoe, 1993 Alice Breen, 1989 Joan Wonsley, 1993 Anne Gibbons, 1979 Margaret Ward, 2000 Vickey Boozman, 1993 Pam Bryant, 1999 Lorraine Woodwark, 2002 John Giles, 2003 Donald White, 1980 Connie Breeding, 1997 Madelyn Burley-Allen, 1997 Agnes Zepeda, 1986 Ouida Gordon, 1987 Margaret Brogley, 1992 Judi Caler, 2015 Hon. Annette Griswold, 2003 ARIZONA Bobbie Buchman, 1986 Rep. Donna Carlson, 1973 COLORADO Hon. Annie L. Gunter, 1979 ^ Stephanie Abney, 1993 Julie Calhoun, 1998 June Cerruto, 1993 Senator Wayne Allard, 2003 Rev. Bob & Helen Hamilton, 1996 Sylvia Allen, 1982 Rick Calhoun, 2002 Jane Chastain, 1990 Rena Anderson, 1979 Pete M. Hanna, 1992 Vicki Archer, 1997 Tina Chipman, 1978 Beverly Cielnicky, 1988 Jean & Craig Baldwin, 1981 Billie Hanson, 1991 Karlene Bailey, 1979 Jeni Cook, 1990 Elizabeth Crucitt, 1996 Carol Belt, 1992 Lester Hollans, 1995 Pat Barbour, 1976 Rep. Tom Cotton, 2013 Sarah Dawson, 2001 Beverly Berg, 2011 Jim & Melonie Holloway, 1994 Andy Biggs, 2002 Robyn and Gunner DeLay, 2001 Barbara Decker, 2012 Betty Boone, 1979 Ruth Ann Howell, 1979 Kathy Biggs, 1980 Cong. Jay Dickey, 2002 Jennifer Delaney, 2007 Rep. Greg Brophy, 2005 Celeste Johnson, 1989 Kitty Bloomhardt, 1974 ^ Jeannie Earl, 1999 Kathleen Dennis, 1994 Nancy Carrizales, 1978 Eric Johnston, 1997 Barbara Brewster, 1999 Minnie Elkins, 1986 Carol Dorman, 1996 Jerry and Lois Clark, 2000 Joan Kendall, 1985 Debra Brimhall, 1996 Dorothy English, 1979 Cong. Robert Dornan, 1977 Robin Coran, 2012 Dr. Bill Krug, 1996 JuDene Brown, 1993 Phillip English, 1982 Ellen & Tom Dougher, 2008 Carlie Davis, 1982 Dr. Edith Ledbetter, 1981 ^ Sen. Trudy Camping, 1973 ^ Judy Freeman, 1977 Karla Downing, 1984 Sue DeBenedictis, 1990 Sen. Curt Lee, 1999 Sen. Larry Chesley, 1994 Juanita Gibson, 1974 Wendy Dreskin, 1988 Dr. James Dobson, 1986 Reva Lewis, 1980 Polly Clark, 1987 Sen. Bobby Glover, 2009 Lyn Durst, 1998 Ruth Dolan, 1983 Sen. Albert Lipscomb, 1995 Shirley Cole, 1987 Rep. Rick Green, 2007 Vickie Edwards, 1996 Madie Lee Duffield, 1980 ^ Debbie Little, 2012 Marion Daley, 1980 Rep. Dan Greenburg, 2007 Doris Enderle, 1978 Kathy & Gary Ellis, 2006 Elaine Little, 1997 Shellee Day, 1997 Laurie Gross, 1995 Karen England, 2000 Mae Eye, 1985 Frances Little, 1979 Rosemary Edmiston, 1976 ^ Betsy Hagan, 1987 Marguerite Ennis, 1979 Linda Finch, 1982 Virginia Maddox, 1988 Marca Epps, 1982 Calvin E. Hagan, 1999 Marilyn Evans, 1989 Jack Fried, 1996 Hon. Mary Sue McClurkin, 2002 Virginia Evers, 1975 Debe Harman, 2001 Ernie Feeney, 1991 Jo Gordon, 1981 Helen McKnight, 1982 Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, 2001 Rep. Eric Harris, 2007 Nancy Fehrmann, 1992 Georgia Green, 1982 Judy McLemore, 1994 Janet Farnsworth, 2000 Jan Hauer, 2001 Louise Ferraro, 1993 ^ Darlene Gsell, 1981 Sen. Wendell Mitchell, 1992 Cong. Trent Franks, 1999 Mary Sue Hedrick, 1982 Heather Gass, 2012 Anita Hathaway, 1982 Charlene Moe, 1986 Joan Galbasini, 1995 Betty Helveston, 1983 Larry Gipson, 2002 Hon. Donald Hodel, 1987 Pam Moore, 1981 Cong. Paul Gosar, 2015 Sen. Peggy Jeffries, 1994 Jeanne
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Who II of Hanover, IL
    1 Who Was Who II of Hanover, IL as of April 7, 2011 This proposed book contains biographies of people from Hanover who died after March 2, 1980, and up until when the book will go to the printer, hopefully in February 2011. The first Who Was Who was a book of biographies of everyone from Hanover, who had died, from the first settlers, up until February 28, 1980, when the book went to the printer. PLEASE let me know ALL middle names of everyone in each bio. This will help people doing research years from now. As you read through the information below PLEASE let me know of any omissions or corrections of any of your friends or family. I want this to be a book that will honor all of our past Hanover residents and to keep them alive in our memory. The prerequisites for being listed in this book are (1) being deceased, (2) having some sort of connection to Hanover, whether that is being born in Hanover or living in Hanover for some time, or (3) being buried in one of the three cemeteries. THANKS, Terry Miller PLEASE make sure that your friend’s and family’s biographies contain all the information listed below: 1. Date of birth 2. Where they were born 3. Parent’s name (including Mother’s maiden name) 4. Where they went to school 5. If they served in the Military – what branch – what years served 6. Married to whom, when and where 7. Name of children (oldest to youngest) 8. Main type of work 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Message to the 117Th Congress: Don't Draft Our Daughters
    Special Message to the 117th Congress: Don’t Draft Our Daughters August 31, 2021 Dear Senators and Representatives, We write to you united in serious concern about the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2022 which the Senate Armed Services Committee approved on July 21. The legislation is unacceptable because it would amend the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) to require young women to register with Selective Service for a possible future draft. Sen. Jack Reed’s deceptively simple language – reportedly to change the MSSA words “male citizens” to “all Americans” – is unnecessary, unwise, and, in our view, outrageous. Imposition of Selective Service obligations, including a possible future draft of our daughters, sisters, and nieces, would not only hurt women, it would compromise our military’s essential function during a time of catastrophic national emergency. A monumental and consequential reversal such as this should not be approved behind closed doors, and the full Senate and House should not rubber-stamp “Draft Our Daughters” language in the NDAA. The only acceptable option is to strike the Reed amendment and seriously, thoroughly, and responsibly consider what the Selective Service law really means. This is a matter of national security – not “women’s rights,” “men’s rights,” or civilian volunteer service. Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution assigns to Congress the authority to establish and support the armed forces and to ensure that they are prepared to secure our nation and defend our freedom. As the Supreme Court has recognized, the purpose of a draft is not to fill various non- combat billets, it is to quickly provide qualified replacements for combat casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • School Choice Programs. What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 411 330 UD 031 356 AUTHOR Tucker, Allyson M., Comp.; Lauber, William F., Comp. TITLE School Choice Programs. What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1995-03-00 NOTE 83p. AVAILABLE FROM Heritage Foundation, Publications Department, 214 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC 20002-4999; fax: 202-544-2260. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Charter Schools; Educational Change; *Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation; *Free Choice Transfer Programs; Grants; *Private Sector; Program Development; *School Choice; State Legislation; *State Programs ABSTRACT School choice advocates made many advances in 1994, and many states seem ready to pass school choice legislation in 1995. This report describes the state of school choice efforts in the individual states. School choice advocates look for action by the Federal Government as Congress discusses ways to help states implement choice, whether by vouchers, block grants, or other approaches. In 1994 there were increased numbers of privately sponsored school choice programs funded by corporations, individuals, and charitable organizations. Analysis of the reports from individual states yields information about school choice. Of the 44 state legislatures that met in 1994, some sort of school choice legislation was introduced or pending in 25 states. Forty state governors have indicated their support for school choice, and at least 41 states have significant policy groups or grassroots coalitions working for school choice. Ten states have implemented charter school legislation, and many other states are deliberating about charter schools. Several thousand students attended the school of their choice under 1 of 16 privately sponsored voucher programs in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Legislative Oversight Committee
    You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. Committee Meeting of SENATE LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE "Testimony regarding the Race to the Top education funding application process" LOCATION: Committee Room 4 DATE: October 7, 2010 State House Annex 9:00 a.m. Trenton, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Senator Barbara A. Buono, Chair Senator M. Teresa Ruiz, Vice Chair Senator Sandra B. Cunningham Senator Paul A. Sarlo Senator Thomas H. Kean ALSO PRESENT: Matthew T. Szudajski Timothy Lydon Frank Dominquez Luke E. Wolff Jason Redd Senate Republican Office of Legislative Services Senate Majority Committee Aide Committee Aides Committee Aides Meeting Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Bret D. Schundler Former Commissioner New Jersey Department of Education 13 APPENDIX: Statement submitted by Bret D. Schundler 1x pnf: 1-126 You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. SENATOR BARBARA BUONO (Chair): Good morning. I’m Senator Buono, the Chair of the Senate Legislative Oversight Committee. We are here today to discuss the circumstances surrounding the application for Race to the Top funding. It was described in detail in the subpoena -- the resolution that supports the subpoena which is demanding the production of documents and the appearance of certain witnesses here today. I just wanted to begin -- before we welcome and swear in the first witness -- that the contractor for the State of New Jersey who was hired to help draft, edit, and prepare the Race to the Top application was in court this morning before Judge Feinberg, with the Attorney General’s office, attempting to raise certain privileges -- executive privilege, other privileges as well -- that would have resulted in Wireless not appearing and producing documents before the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Transgender Legislation
    WHAT WE ARE UP AGAINST • The Heritage Foundation • Family Policy Alliance • Alliance for Defending Freedom • American College of Pediatrics • The Eagle Forum • Family Research Council • Focus on the Family • Concerned Women for America • More https://promisetoamericaschildren.org/about-us/ GROUP OF SIX “Our organizations are strongly opposed to any legislation or regulation that would interfere with the provision of evidence- based patient care for any patient, affirming our commitment to patient safety. We recognize health as a basic human right for every person, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. For gender-diverse individuals, including children and adolescents, this means access to gender-affirming care that is part of comprehensive primary care.” http://www.groupof6.org/content/dam/AAFP/documents/advocacy/prevention/equality/ST-G6- FrontlinePhysiciansOpposeLegislationThatInterferesInOrPenalizesPatientCare-040221.pdf PROHIBIT GENDER AFFIRMING CARE Pending Failed Enacted AAP, AR AAP, ACLU, ACLU OF ARKANSAS | HB 1570 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-4dxbpGGPY ARKANSAS HB 1570 • Governor veto on • Prohibits gender-affirming care Monday • Prohibits pediatricians and other • Legislature overrides physicians from referring youth for veto on Tuesday gender-affirming care • The bill is now law • Classifies providing this care as unprofessional conduct • Effective the 91st day after adjournment • Prohibits any public funding for gender-affirming care • However, legislature is only expected to • Prohibits Medicaid from paying for recess on April 30, gender-affirming care not adjourn • GRAY AREA – psychiatric care – The sponsor has repeatedly stated that mental health care is allowed IN THE NEWS PROHIBIT ATHLETIC TEAM PARTICIPATION Pending Failed Enacted Enacted in 2020 Turned into a study bill Executive Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Though General Election Focused on Economy, Religion-Related Storylines Were a Key Element in the Campaign
    How the News Media Covered Religion in the General Election Obama Gets Most Coverage, Much of It on False Rumor He Is a Muslim Nov. 20, 2008 Religion played a much more significant role in the media coverage of President-elect Barack Obama than it did in the press treatment of Republican nominee John McCain during the 2008 presidential campaign, but much of the coverage related to false yet persistent rumors that Obama is a Muslim. Meanwhile, there was little attempt by the news media during the campaign to comprehensively examine the role of faith in the political values and policies of the candidates, save for those of Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. And when religion-focused campaign stories were covered by the mainstream press, often the context was negative, controversial or focused on a perceived political problem. In all, religion was a significant but not overriding storyline in the media coverage of the 2008 campaign. But in a campaign in which an Obama victory would give the U.S. its first black president, religion received as much coverage in the media as race. These are some of the findings of a new study of the coverage of religion in the campaign conducted by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism and Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. The study examined religion-focused election coverage in 48 different news outlets between June 1 and Oct. 15, 2008. 1 The “culture war” issues that have been prominent in past elections, such as abortion and gay marriage, received minimal attention in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • R E P O R T on the Activities Committee on Finance
    1 108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 108–31 R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE DURING THE 107TH CONGRESS PURSUANT TO Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE MARCH 31, 2003.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–010—DTP WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Dec 13 2002 23:49 Mar 31, 2003 Jkt 019010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\SR031.XXX SR031 e:\seals\congress.#13 [107TH] COMMITTEE ON FINANCE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah MAX BAUCUS, Montana FRANK H. MURKOWSKI, Alaska JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia DON NICKLES, Oklahoma TOM DASCHLE, South Dakota PHIL GRAMM, Texas JOHN BREAUX, Louisiana TRENT LOTT, Mississippi KENT CONRAD, North Dakota JAMES M. JEFFORDS, Vermont BOB GRAHAM, Florida FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas KOLAN DAVIS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel JOHN ANGELL, Democratic Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON TAXATION AND IRS OVERSIGHT DON NICKLES, Oklahoma, Chairman TRENT LOTT, Mississippi KENT CONRAD, North Dakota ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee JOHN BREAUX, Louisiana OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico FRANK H.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • Campi Chapter 3 1 “Renegotiating Norms, Reforming Social Power
    Campi Chapter 3 “Renegotiating Norms, Reforming Social Power: The Mobilization of Everyday Attachments in Evangelical Pro-Family Discourse” Draft Prepared for The University of Chicago American Politics Workshop February 23, 2015 Ashleigh Campi PhD Candidate, Political Science Abstract The strength of the American family is at the center of a new ideological constellation of US conservative politics that emerged in the late 1970s and remains in force today. The growth of evangelical Christianity, and the re-entry of US evangelicals to the forefront of the political scene during this period propelled the mobilization of concerns over the family. This chapter focuses on the discourses of the networks of non-profits through which the evangelical subculture enters into politics, focusing on the subculture’s most enduring and influential group, Focus on the Family. Analyzing radio broadcasts, online organizational literature, and newsletters from Focus and its sister organizations, I attempt to show how everyday norms of gender, work, and caregiving are mobilized politically. Foregrounding subcultural processes of political consciousness formation, I challenge Judith Butler’s influential theorization of the relationship between normativity and social power as ‘passionate attachment.’ This paper develops an alternative, psychoanalytically informed account of social norms through a reading of evangelical family discourses. Interpreting quotidian self-help and inspirational programming, phone- line counseling services, and multi-media guides for mentoring and family support provided by Focus ministries, I show that that norms can be reproduced through relational strategies and self-reflective practices. The picture of normative attachment derived from this reading informs my account of political consciousness formation. 1 Campi Chapter 3 Introduction In the last third of the twentieth century, the socio-cultural and institutional support base of the US Republican Party, as well as its ruling ideologies, underwent a profound transformation.
    [Show full text]