DOCSLIB.ORG

The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications Fragkiskos Malliaros, Christos Giatsidis, Apostolos Papadopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications Fragkiskos Malliaros, Christos Giatsidis, Apostolos Papadopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications Fragkiskos Malliaros, Christos Giatsidis, Apostolos Papadopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis To cite this version: Fragkiskos Malliaros, Christos Giatsidis, Apostolos Papadopoulos, Michalis Vazirgiannis. The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. The VLDB Journal, Springer, 2019. hal-01986309v3 HAL Id: hal-01986309 https://hal-centralesupelec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01986309v3 Submitted on 3 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications (The VLDB Journal, 2019) Fragkiskos D. Malliaros∗, Christos Giatsidisy, Apostolos N. Papadopoulosz, and Michalis Vazirgiannisx Abstract The core decomposition of networks has attracted significant attention due to its numerous appli- cations in real-life problems. Simply stated, the core decomposition of a network (graph) assigns to each graph node v, an integer number c(v) (the core number), capturing how well v is connected with respect to its neighbors. This concept is strongly related to the concept of graph degeneracy, which has a long history in Graph Theory. Although the core decomposition concept is extremely simple, there is an enormous interest in the topic from diverse application domains, mainly because it can be used to analyze a network in a simple and concise manner by quantifying the significance of graph nodes. Therefore, there exists a respectable number of research works that either propose efficient algorithmic techniques under different settings and graph types or apply the concept to another problem or scientific area. Based on this large interest in the topic, in this survey, we perform an in-depth discussion of core decomposition, focusing mainly on: i) the basic theory and fundamental concepts, ii) the algorithmic techniques proposed for computing it efficiently under different settings, and iii) the applications that can benefit significantly from it. Keywords: Core decomposition, graph mining, graph degeneracy, graph theory, algorithms ∗Center for Visual Computing, CentraleSup´elec,University of Paris-Saclay and Inria Saclay, France. Email: fragkiskos. [email protected] yComputer Science Laboratory, Ecole´ Polytechnique, France. Email: [email protected] zSchool of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Email: [email protected] xComputer Science Laboratory, Ecole´ Polytechnique, France. Email: [email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Fundamental Concepts8 2.1 Simple Graphs . .8 2.2 Extensions to Other Types of Graphs . 10 2.2.1 Directed Graphs . 10 2.2.2 Weighted Graphs . 10 2.2.3 Signed Graphs . 11 2.2.4 Bipartite Graphs . 11 2.2.5 Dynamic Graphs . 11 2.2.6 Temporal Graphs . 12 2.2.7 Probabilistic Graphs . 12 2.2.8 Multilayer Graphs . 12 2.2.9 Hidden Graphs . 13 2.3 Generalized Core Decomposition . 13 2.4 Extensions of the Core Decomposition . 14 2.4.1 Truss Decomposition . 14 2.4.2 Density-friendly Core Decomposition . 15 2.4.3 Peak Decomposition . 15 2.4.4 Nucleus Decomposition . 16 2.4.5 Distance-based Core Decomposition . 17 2.4.6 k-tip Decomposition . 18 2.4.7 Radius-Bounded Decomposition . 19 3 Algorithmic Techniques 20 3.1 In-Memory Computation . 20 3.2 Disk-Resident Graphs . 21 3.3 Core Decomposition in Dynamic Environments . 23 3.4 Local Computation of Core Numbers . 26 3.5 Parallel and Distributed Techniques . 27 3.5.1 Parallel Computation . 28 3.5.2 Distributed Computation . 29 3.6 Probabilistic Core Decomposition . 31 4 Representative Application Domains 33 4.1 Network Modeling and Analysis . 33 4.2 Temporal Evolution . 33 4.3 Anomaly Detection . 34 4.4 Detection of Influential Spreaders . 34 4.5 Network Visualization . 35 4.6 Communities and Dense Subgraphs . 37 4.7 Text Analytics . 38 4.8 The Anchored k-Core Problem and Engagement Dynamics in Social Graphs . 39 4.9 Graph Similarity . 39 2 4.10 Physics, Biology and Ecology . 40 4.11 Neuroscience . 41 5 Conclusions and Further Research 41 3 1 Introduction Graph management and graph mining are two important research areas with a plethora of significant practical applications [3, 36]. The main reason for this is the fact that graphs are ubiquitous and, therefore, their efficient management and mining is necessary to guarantee fast and meaningful knowledge discovery. Research on graph processing and mining was boosted by the need to explore and analyze massive graphs in Big Data Analytics tasks, aiming at computational efficiency and high scalability. A network or graph (we will use the terms interchangeably) is denoted by G(V; E), where V is the set of nodes or vertices and E is the set of edges or links. We will follow the trend in the literature and use the symbol n for the number of nodes (n = jV j) and the symbol m for the number of edges (m = jEj). The number of neighbors of a node u 2 V plays a central role in general, and it will be denoted by deg(u). Figure1(a) presents a simple graph G(V; E) with n = 8 nodes and m = 12 edges. Based on the degree definition, deg(v1) = 2, deg(v4) = 2 whereas node v3 has the highest degree deg(v3) = 5. Therefore, node v8 has the smallest degree and node v3 the highest. (a) 1-core (b) 2-core (c) 3-core Figure 1: A small graph G with n = 8 nodes and m = 12 edges and the corresponding 1-core, 2-core and 3-core of G. In many modern applications graphs are first class citizens. For example: • The Web [80] can be modeled as a graph, where nodes represent web pages and edges represent hyperlinks among them. • In a social network [2], nodes may represent users and edges may provide information regarding friendship relationships. • In protein analysis, a protein-protein interaction network (PPI for short) [122] may be represented as a graph, where nodes represent different proteins and edges capture the interaction between proteins during a specific experiment. • Graphs may also represent interactions among different types of nodes. For example, purchase information may be captured by using a bipartite graph, where a set of nodes (e.g., customers) interact with another set of nodes (e.g., products). In this case, a link between a customer c and a product p captures the fact that p was purchased by c. These are only a few examples of applications that model elements and the interactions among them by using a graph structure. In these cases, it is important to rely on the structural properties of the interactions among the elements in order to discover useful and meaningful patterns. Exploring and analyzing massive complex networks involves the execution of (usually) computationally intensive tasks, aiming at uncovering the network structure and detecting the presence of useful patterns 4 that could be proven significant. Some important graph mining tasks involve: reachability queries, graph partitioning, graph clustering, classification of graph nodes, predicting network evolution, discovering dense subgraphs, detecting influential spreaders. In many cases we are searching for graph nodes that are considered \central" with respect to a specific problem at hand. Therefore, the concept of node importance is crucial in network analysis, since it is expected that among the nodes of a massive network, only a small fraction is of high significance. Evidently, one should first determine a method to quantify this significance (importance), since this concept is highly related to the application under consideration. For example, if we assume that we are interested in nodes with a large degree (simply because the number of links is important), then evidently, importance is directly measured by counting the number of neighbors of every node (a concept known as degree centrality). As another example, we may define importance in relation to the number of triangles each node participates in; the higher the number of triangles, the higher the node importance. Another popular measure of importance is the total number of shortest paths passing through a specific node (also known as betweenness centrality [50]). Also, one can quantify node importance using the concept of random walks and applying techniques similar to PageRank [27]. In such a case, the importance of a node is represented by the probability that this node will be visited by a random walker. Based on the previous discussion, we realize that there is a plethora of different ways to define impor- tance. However, it turns out that the concept of core decomposition can be used efficiently and effectively to quantify node importance in many different domains, thus, avoiding the use of more complex and com- putationally intensive algorithmic techniques. To be precise, the core decomposition of a simple graph G can be computed in linear time with respect to the number of edges of G, if the computation is done in main memory. Simply put, the k-core of a graph G is the maximal induced subgraph Gk, where the number of neighbors of every node u in Gk is at least k. The core number of a node u (c(u)) is defined as the maximum value of k such that u is contained in Gk. Figure1 illustrates the 1-core, the 2-core and the 3-core of a toy graph. Based on the definition of the core number, it holds that c(v8) = 1, c(v1) = 2 and c(v6) = 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fine-Grained Complexity of the Graph Homomorphism Problem For
    Fine-grained complexity of the graph homomorphism problem for bounded-treewidth graphs∗ Karolina Okrasa†1,2 and Paweł Rzążewski‡1,2 1Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland 2Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw February 20, 2020 Abstract For graphs G and H,a homomorphism from G to H is an edge-preserving mapping from the vertex set of G to the vertex set of H. For a fixed graph H, by Hom(H) we denote the computational problem which asks whether a given graph G admits a homomorphism to H. If H is a complete graph with k vertices, then Hom(H) is equivalent to the k-Coloring problem, so graph homomorphisms can be seen as generalizations of colorings. It is known that Hom(H) is polynomial-time solvable if H is bipartite or has a vertex with a loop, and NP-complete otherwise [Hell and Nešetřil, JCTB 1990]. In this paper we are interested in the complexity of the problem, parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph G. If G has n vertices and is given along with its tree decomposition of width tw(G), then the problem can be solved in time |V (H)|tw(G) · nO(1), using a straightforward dynamic programming. We explore whether this bound can be improved. We show that if H is a projective core, then the existence of such a faster algorithm is unlikely: assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), the Hom(H) problem cannot be solved in time (|V (H)|− ε)tw(G) · nO(1), for any ε > 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications
    The Core Decomposition of Networks: Theory, Algorithms and Applications Fragkiskos D. Malliaros∗, Christos Giatsidisy, Apostolos N. Papadopoulosz, and Michalis Vazirgiannisx Abstract The core decomposition of networks has attracted significant attention due to its numerous appli- cations in real-life problems. Simply stated, the core decomposition of a network (graph) assigns to each graph node v, an integer number c(v) (the core number), capturing how well v is connected with respect to its neighbors. This concept is strongly related to the concept of graph degeneracy, which has a long history in Graph Theory. Although the core decomposition concept is extremely simple, there is an enormous interest in the topic from diverse application domains, mainly because it can be used to analyze a network in a simple and concise manner by quantifying the significance of graph nodes. Therefore, there exists a respectable number of research works that either propose efficient algorithmic techniques under different settings and graph types or apply the concept to another problem or scientific area. Based on this large interest in the topic, in this survey, we perform an in-depth discussion of core decomposition, focusing mainly on: i) the basic theory and fundamental concepts, ii) the algorithmic techniques proposed for computing it efficiently under different settings, and iii) the applications that can benefit significantly from it. Keywords: Core decomposition, graph mining, graph degeneracy, graph theory, algorithms ∗Center for Visual Computing, CentraleSup´elec,University of Paris-Saclay and Inria Saclay, France. Email: fragkiskos. [email protected] yComputer Science Laboratory, Ecole´ Polytechnique, France. Email: [email protected] zSchool of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Homomorphisms: Structure and Symmetry
    Graph homomorphisms: structure and symmetry Geˇna HAHN D´epartement d’informatique et de recherche op´erationnelle and Claude TARDIF D´epartement de math´ematiques et de statistique Universit´ede Montr´eal C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, H3C 3J7 Canada Abstract This paper is the first part of an introduction to the subject of graph homomorphism in the mixed form of a course and a survey. We give the basic definitions, examples and uses of graph homomorphisms and mention some results that consider the structure and some parameters of the graphs involved. We discuss vertex transitive graphs and Cayley graphs and their rather fundamental role in some aspects of graph homomorphisms. Graph colourings are then explored as homomorphisms, followed by a discussion of various graph products. 1 Introduction Homomorphisms provide a way of simplifying the structure of objects one wishes to study while preserving much of it that is of significance. Most mathematicians remember the iso- morphism theorems we learn in a first course on group theory, and certainly anyone involved in some way with mathematics or computer science knows about integers modulo some n. It is not surprising that homomorphisms also appeared in graph theory, and that they have proven useful in many areas. We do not claim to provide the definitive survey but only an introductory course. Of necessity, we had to omit most proofs and, sadly, even many results and some aspects of the subject matter. But we do try to provide an extensive bibliography and the interested reader will be able to find the missing pieces with little trouble.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Graph Homomorphisms
    Structure of Graph Homomorphisms Roman Bac& bISc., Comenius' University, Czechoslovakia, 1988 A THESIS SUBBIITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOROF PHILOSOPHY in the School of Computing Science @) Roman Batik 1997 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY August, 1997 AU rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. National Library Biblithèque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington OttawaON KlAON4 ûttawaON KlAW CaMda canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to BibIiothéque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distrîbute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/jilm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts f?om it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract In this thesis we study finite graphs and graph homomorphisms from both, a theo- retical and a practical view point. A homomorphism between two graphs G and H is a function from the vertex set of G to the vertex set of H, which maps adjacent vertices of G to adjacent vertices of H.
    [Show full text]