DOCSLIB.ORG

The Armenian Crisis” Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Armenian Crisis” Nov Studying the Ottomans: Section 2: Ottomans in the Modern World (19th -early 20th C.) Revolution in the Caliphate: conflict, refugees and challenges to survival “The Armenian Crisis” Nov. 19-23 Ethnic ‘Regions’ c. 1911: Armenians Ottoman ‘Armenia’: Six wilayets The Armenian Crisis: It is largely agreed that between 1 and 1.5 million Ottoman Armenians died during (and briefly after) WWI, with majority of deaths occurring in 1915-16 It is also agreed that those deaths were gruesome: - from malnutrition, starvation, thirst - from violent robberies, rapes - from ‘execution’ – organized shootings, hangings - by civilians, soldiers, army officers This is about ALL that is ‘agreed upon’ The Armenian Crisis: ‘Genocide?’ - it is the term itself that remains (even today) in debate - Barak Obama appeared poised to recognize the term as appropriate on the eve of his first election but has so far stopped short of using the term - Turkey has, to date, denied that it occurred – although just recently there are signs that it can be ‘discussed’ [see ‘Obama in Turkey’, ‘Armenian Genocide no longer Taboo’ in ‘Resources’] The Armenian Crisis: What is the ‘issue’? - understanding of term ‘genocide’ - defined in Articles II and III [latter deals with punishment] of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide [see Legal Definition..., ‘Resources’] The Armenian Crisis: • Article II: 1) the mental element -- the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and •2) thephysical element -- includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e (below). Crime must include both elements to be "genocide." The Armenian Crisis: Genocide means any of the following acts committed as per Article II (1) above: • Killing members of the group; • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group The Armenian Crisis: Argument FOR Genocide: - evidence supports existence of BOTH Article II (1) – the Intent to Destroy (‘mental element’) Article II (2) – (a), (b), (c) most frequently cited; also (e) to lesser extent (‘physical element’) THEREFORE, there is no question but that the loss of 1 – 1.5 million Armenians was Genocide The Armenian Crisis: Argument AGAINST Genocide: - Article II (1): the phrase ‘intent to destroy…’ Those who would adopt the term ‘massacre’ (including Turkish officials) challenge the aspect of ‘intent’ on the part of Government: - events took place in context of war - fear of Armenians working with Russians, would undermine war effort - local level: spontaneous violence rooted in long- held grievances The Armenian Crisis: Arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ also rest on reading of Evidence: - evidence used to support ‘Genocide’ questioned by other ‘side’ [see ‘Armenian Genocide Revisited’, Additional Readings] - photographic, eye-witness, ‘documentary’ evidence prove atrocities took place but questionable whether they can prove ‘intent’ (‘government orchestrated’) even when soldiers involved (‘tragedy of war’) Turkish cartoon on the subject of documentary evidence “The Lion – ‘Here, this is a document of the Bear’s dastardly behaviour…’. “The Rabbit – ‘This is a document showing how theDeer collaborated with the Hunters…’. “The Bear – ‘I have a document demonstrating the Lion’s trade in White Bears in the forest…’. “The Cameraman – ‘Some documentary this is turning out to be...’. The Armenian Crisis: - can government be held accountable for inability of women, children to withstand difficulties of march to Syrian desert (‘for their safety and security of war effort’)? - can it be held responsible for actions of bandits, ‘rogue’ soldiers, local citizens? - can it be expected to have dealt with these issues while fighting on two fronts (one being strategically ‘key’ battle of Gallipoli)? The Armenian Crisis: IF one answers ‘yes’, then charge of genocide remains valid IF one answers ‘no’, then charge of genocide is invalid IF one accepts that evidence in play proves extensive government involvement, the charge of genocide remains valid IF one does not accept this interpretation of key evidence, the charge of genocide is invalid The Armenian Crisis: So… why Armenian ‘Crisis’? - not our intent to resolve controversy of this magnitude (although fascinating study in relevance of ‘history’ in contemporary politics) - for ‘history of Ottoman Empire’ and ‘legacy of Ottoman Empire’, what happened to Armenians and why -- was and remains, a political and social ‘crisis’ - critical to ‘defeat’ of Ottoman government, 1919 trials notwithstanding, opening door to Mustapha Kemal’s victory over Sultanate [video/discussion Dec. 3-5] The Armenian Crisis: Problem with focus on ‘debate’: ignores evolution of crisis from 19th C. [see lectures Week of October 22-6] - ‘history’ situates roots in Russian victory 1828 (Region of Erivan), also 1878 (Treaty of Berlin): - both sent Muslim Turks as ‘refugees’ into eastern Anatolia - region of Armenian wilayets - expulsions continued1878-1904: 850,000 Muslim refugees re-settled Anatolia, many in regions with large Armenian populations Muslim Turks ‘Expelled’ into Armenian Areas The Armenian Crisis: - granted ‘special privileges’ Armenian merchants, financiers 1863: resented - 1894-6: 100-300,000 Armenians killed in combination of attacks by: - Abdul Hamid II’s newly-formed Kurdish ‘para- military’ group ‘Hamidiye’ (eastern region): exploiting local ‘inter-ethnic’ tensions - Istanbul police (on occasion Armenian demonstration for implementation reforms against Hamidiye) Attracted attention and approbation of West: but no action c.1911: Kurds and Armenians [note overlapping populations] Kharpert - centres where ‘Hamidiye’ massacres took place The Armenian Crisis: Armenians Welcomed Revolution 1908: - Constitution promised equality, equal access to professional posts and government positions, freedom religion [Articles 9, 10 in particular, see Additional Readings, Armenians Celebrating 1908 Nov. 14] The Armenian Crisis: Counter Revolution and ‘Adana Massacre’ 1909: - as part of ‘counter-revolution’ fought against CUP, local violence took form of attacks on any ‘seen’ as supporting revolution - Armenians (in general) part of that group - in Adana, troops brought in to quell violence: ‘reported’ that they not only did not stop killings but actually participated --15-30,000 Armenians died * Region of ‘Adana Massacres’ 1909; Remains of Village Attacked (right) The Armenian Crisis: World War I: Ottomans enter war on side of Germany - Russians allied with Western Powers - summer 1914, formed ‘Armenian Volunteer Units’: non-Russian (Ottoman) Armenians ‘defected’ from Empire - February 1915, Armenians withdrawn from all active positions in Army for fear that if opportunity provided, they might prove disloyal: attached to labour units, passive ‘unarmed’ logistical support The Armenian Crisis: Dec.1914 or Jan. 1915: memorandum of CUP: ‘Ten Commandments’ [see Additional Readings] - would seem damning indictment but… - questioned on several bases: - no original - doubts as to ‘handwriting’ on said original - doubts as to date Among ‘documents’ referred to in ‘Revisiting Armenian Genocide’ as being of unproven authenticity The Armenian Crisis: April 24, 1915: Circular from Ministry of Interior to Ottoman Army Commander-in-Chief - no doubts concerning this document: clearly spells out orders to arrest all Armenians in order to prevent further attempts to undermine Ottoman war efforts and incite local uprisings (against the government) - some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders rounded up, imprisoned immediately - some later executed, most deported (May, 1915) Armenian intellectuals Talaat Pasha arrested 24 April, 1915 Minister who who were later executed irdered arrests 1915 (May) Civilian Armenians, Self-Defence Unit holding against Ottoman Forces, Siege of Van, May (eastern region) 1915 (April) Armenians from Khapert being led to prison (central region) ** Khapert (left) Van (right) Ottoman Soldiers in front of Hanged Armenians, Aleppo (Syria), 1915 The Tehcir: ‘Temporary Law of Deportation’ - approval to deport Armenians (29 May, 1915) The Armenian Crisis: The Tehcir: - in principle ‘temporary’ authorization to deport any Armenians who might be considered a threat to security - began in eastern region (related to situation in Van – refusal to supply full number conscripts to Ottoman army led to accusations of ‘aiding the enemy’ and ‘rebelliousness’) The Armenian Crisis: - extended ‘fear of inciting riots, massacres’ from Van to Armenian population in general - yet many of those ‘deported’ towards Syria (desert) were women and children - controversial reports of ‘camps’ near borders Syria and Iraq: transit? Or…extermination? * . Desert Deportations: note ‘geography’ of Eastern Anatolia "THOSE WHO FELL BY THE WAYSIDE. Scenes like this were common all over the Armenian provinces, in the spring and summer months of 1915. Death in its several forms--- massacre, starvation, exhaustion---destroyed the larger part of the refugees. The Turkish policy was that of extermination under the guise of deportation" [from American Ambassador Morganthau’s publication 1918]** The Armenian Crisis: **Note: - Morganthau worked for the “American Committee for Relief in the Near East” between 1915-1930 - Book
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915
    Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 i v ABSTRACT Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Yektan Turkyilmaz 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the conflict in Eastern Anatolia in the early 20th century and the memory politics around it. It shows how discourses of victimhood have been engines of grievance that power the politics of fear, hatred and competing, exclusionary
    [Show full text]
  • Sabiha Gökçen's 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ―Sabiha Gökçen‘s 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation Formation and the Ottoman Armenians A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Fatma Ulgen Committee in charge: Professor Robert Horwitz, Chair Professor Ivan Evans Professor Gary Fields Professor Daniel Hallin Professor Hasan Kayalı Copyright Fatma Ulgen, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Fatma Ulgen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my mother and father, without whom there would be no life, no love, no light, and for Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 - 19 January 2007 iv EPIGRAPH ―In the summertime, we would go on the roof…Sit there and look at the stars…You could reach the stars there…Over here, you can‘t.‖ Haydanus Peterson, a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, reminiscing about the old country [Moush, Turkey] in Fresno, California 72 years later. Courtesy of the Zoryan Institute Oral History Archive v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • Adana, Massacre In, 57–59 Alice in Hungerland, 143 American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief, 139, 140 American Commit
    the genocide of the armenians • 191 INDEX Adana, massacre in, 57–59 reasons for, 81–82; survivors, 83–84; Alice in Hungerland, 143 Turkish explanations for, 85, 87, 92; American Committee for women and children, abuse of, 98–106; Armenian and Syrian Relief, 139, 140 World War I and, 87, 89, 90, 91 American Committee for Relief in the Near East Armenian Genocide: News Accounts from the (ACRNE), 139, 141 American Press: 1915–1922 (Zakarian), 76 American Red Cross, 45 Armenian Revolutionary Federation American Relief Administration (ARA), 160 (Dashnakstutiun), 31, 42–43, 48–50, 51, 59 Aroosian, Arax, 4 Anatolia, 85 Assyrians, treatment of, 110 Andreasian, Dikran, 125–126 Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (Lemkin), 186 Ararat, Mt., 12 Arendt, Hannah, 175 Arlen, Michael J., 4, 5, 181–182 Balakian, Krikoris, 92–93 Argentina, the Disappeared in, 12 Balakian, Peter, 3–4, 12, 31–33, 42–43 Armenakan Party, 31 Balkan League, 65 Armenia, Balkans, fighting in the, 28–29 history of, 23–24; Bank Ottoman, 48–49, 50 map of historic, 22; Republic of, 147–148, 162–164 Barton, Clara, 45 Barton, James L., 139, 140 Armenian(s), fighting in the Balkans and position of, 28–30; Berlin, treaty of, 28–29, 31, 171 identity, 10–13; Bey, Essad, 73 organizing for change following the Treaty of Berlin, 31–33; Bitlis, 84 views of the Great Powers toward, 23–24; Black Dog of Fate (Balakian), 3, 12 we (Armenians) versus they (Turks), 68–70 Bloody News from My Friend (Siamanto), 58 Armenian Genocide, choices and, 113–144; Boettrich, Lieutenant Colonel, 94 denial of, 174–179;
    [Show full text]
  • The Agency of •Œtriggering Mechanismsâ•Š As a Factor in The
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 4 September 2006 The Agency of “Triggering Mechanisms” as a Factor in the Organization of the Genocide Against the Armenians of Kayseri District Vahakn N. Dadrian Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Dadrian, Vahakn N. (2006) "The Agency of “Triggering Mechanisms” as a Factor in the Organization of the Genocide Against the Armenians of Kayseri District," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 4. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Agency of ‘‘Triggering Mechanisms’’ as a Factor in the Organization of the Genocide Against the Armenians of Kayseri District Vahakn N. Dadrian Zoryan Institute Using the notion of a ‘‘triggering mechanism’’ as a guidepost, this article details the sequence of events precipitated by the accidental explosion of a bomb a young Armenian was tinkering with in anticipation of a new round of massacres he hoped to obviate. The ensuing massive and indiscriminate arrests throughout the length and breadth of the district, the attendant use of a variety of methods of torture, and the eventual eradication of the bulk of the district’s Armenian population through courts-martial, followed by serial executions through hanging, deportation, and massacre, are depicted and analyzed to demonstrate the exterminatory thrust of the ensemble of the counter-active governmental measures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople During the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 | 2006 Issue 2 | Article 8 “When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Abstract. The ne voy Carl Ellis Wandel was the sole Danish diplomatic representative in Constantinople before, during, and after World War I, and between 1914 and 1925 he wrote hundreds of detailed reports on the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, as well as on related subjects. This article analyzes and contextualizes some of his most important reports, showing how these hitherto unknown sources contribute to the understanding of vital aspects of the Armenian Genocide, not least concerning the ongoing scholarly debate between ‘‘intentionalist’’ and ‘‘structuralist’’ interpretations of the event and concerning the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians as a particularly radical part of a Young Turk project of Turkification. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Bjørnlund, Matthias (2006) "“When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 8. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘‘When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent’’: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Copenhagen, Denmark The envoy Carl Ellis Wandel was the sole Danish diplomatic representative in Constantinople before, during, and after World War I, and between 1914 and 1925 he wrote hundreds of detailed reports on the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, as well as on related subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue 1.2
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 1 September 2006 Full Issue 1.2 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation (2006) "Full Issue 1.2," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/1 This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Significance of the Armenian Genocide after Ninety Years Roger W. Smith Each genocide provides a foundation for subsequent horrors. Each historical misrepresentation of efforts to exterminate a particular ethnic group increases the likelihood that such efforts will be undertaken again in another time and place. That over one million Armenian men, women, and children could have been subjected to genocide by the Young Turk government in 1915 and that the world for many years would not remember is profoundly disturbing. Not to remember the suffering of the victims is, above all, a failure of humanity and compassion on our part—a lack of respect and care for fellow humans who have fallen victim to the ultimate outrage against justice, the death of a people. We do not ordinarily think of the dead as having rights, but there is at least one they possess: the right to have the world ‘‘hear and learn the truth about the circumstances of their death.’’1 This is the one right that, ninety years later, can still be restored to them, and surely we can do no less.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Genocide Timeline (Key Events)
    Armenian Genocide Timeline (key events) 13 April 1909: Sultan Abdul Hamid II deposed, bringing the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) the ‘Three Pashas’ to power. 14 April 1909: the Adana Massacre begins, resulting in approximately 30,000 Armenian deaths. 01 August 1914: Germany and the Ottoman Empire sign a secret alliance treaty. 02 August 1914: Western Armenians are asked to incite Eastern Armenians to rise against the Russian Empire at the Armenian Congress in Erzurum but understandably refused, while pledging loyalty to the Ottoman Empire. 27 September 1914: the Armenian population in Zeitun is required to turn in its weapons. 30 September 1914: the government distributes arms to the Muslim residents in Erzurum. 17 October 1914: gangs of released criminal chette begin looting, raping and massacres in Erzurum. 29 October 1914: the Ottoman Empire makes an unannounced attack on Russia as three warships shell Odessa. Three days later, Russia declares war on Turkey. 05 November, 1914: France and Britain declare war on the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire. 18 November 1914: a proclamation of Jihad (war) is announced against Christians (Germans are exempted). 23 December 1914: nationwide desecration of churches by Turks, with crosses replaced by crescents. 17 January 1915: Battle of Sarikamish (Kars, north-eastern Turkey) ends with Russian Tsarist forces defeating the Turkish Third Army. 02 February 1915: Talaat Pasha tells German Ambassador Count Hans von Wangenheim that it is the moment to conclude the ‘Armenian Question’. 14 February 1915: Tahir Jevdet, the governor-general of Van Province, is reported saying that the government must begin finishing the Armenians in Van at once.
    [Show full text]
  • 148 the Adana Massacre and the People's Historical
    THE ADANA MASSACRE AND THE PEOPLE’S HISTORICAL MEMORY Verjiné Svazlian Beginning from as early as 1955, I have written down, tape- and video-recorded, academically studied and published the testimonies (memoirs, Armenian and Turkish-language songs) communicated by eyewitness survivors, who were miraculously saved from the Adana massacre and the Armenian Genocide, were forcibly deported from about 100 localities of Western Armenia, Cilicia, Anatolia and resettled in Armenia and the Diaspora. The originals of these materials are kept at the archives of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute NAS RA. These popular testimonies communicated by the eyewitness survivors, become, owing to their historico-cognitive value, authentic, objective and documental evidences, which are not only attestations of the past, but are also a warning for the future. Beginning from as early as 1955, during more than 50 years, I have written down, tape- and video-recorded (remaining faithful to the popular speech), academically studied and published the testimonies (700 units: memoirs, Armenian and Turkish-language songs) communicated by eyewitness survivors, who were miraculously saved from the Adana massacre (1909) and the Armenian Genocide (1915-1923), were forcibly deported from about 100 localities of Western Armenia, Cilicia, Anatolia and resettled in Armenia and the Diaspora (Greece, France, Italy, Germany, USA, Canada, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, the Balkan countries, Turkey, etc.). The originals of these testimonies are kept at the archives of the Museum-Institute of the Armenian Genocide of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia. The popular testimonies, narrated by the eyewitness survivors, saturated with expressive depth and descriptiveness has been created under the immediate impressions of those historico- political events.
    [Show full text]
  • Grigor Zohrab June 26, 1861 — May 21, 1915
    Հ.Մ.Ը.Մ.-Ի ԳԼԵՆԴԵԼԻ ԱՐԱՐԱՏ ՄԱՍՆԱՃԻՒՂԻ ՄՇԱԿՈՒԹԱՅԻՆ ԲԱԺԱՆՄՈՒNՔ Homenetmen Glendale Ararat Chapter Cultural Division Get to Know… Volume 2, Issue 6 June 2009 GRIGOR ZOHRAB JUNE 26, 1861 — MAY 21, 1915 Grigor Zohrap was an influential Armenian writer, politician, lawyer and philanthropist, living in Istanbul, Turkey. He was arrested and killed by Turkish authorities during the Armenian Genocide. Zohrab was born into a wealthy family in Bestikas, Istanbul in 1861. His early education was completed at a local Catholic Armenian school. He received a civil engineering degree from Galatasaray Institute, but did not work in that field. Instead, he enrolled in a newly opened law school, the Imperial University of Jurisprudence, and received his law degree in 1882. He was a revered lawyer in the courts of the Ottoman Empire. He became a professor at the university, teaching law. Grigor Zohrab defended successfully many Armenians charged with a variety of political and criminal offenses between 1895-96. As a result of his defense of a Bulgarian revolutionary in the course of which he accused a Turkish official of torture, he was disbarred and forced to live abroad. In 1908, following the revolution of the Young Turks, he became a member of parliament in the Ottoman Council, and also served his community as an Armenian councilor. Ever since he was a teenager, Zohrab showed great interest in national work and contributed heavily to his community. At the age of 30 he was chosen to be part of the national council of Constantinople and served on the council until his death.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Survivors: An Ethnographic Study of Armenian American Activism and Expression Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zr346nw Author King, Melissa Ruth Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Survivors: An Ethnographic Study of Armenian American Activism and Expression A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Melissa Ruth King June 2013 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Christina Schwenkel, Chairperson Dr. Sally Ness Dr. Paul Ryer Copyright by Melissa Ruth King 2013 The Dissertation of Melissa Ruth King is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I sincerely wish to thank all who made possible the realization of this project. I thank my advisors, Christina Schwenkel, Sally Ness, and Paul Ryer for their support and editorship. They were gracious enough to hear what I often poorly communicated and then offer helpful guidance. Other members of the University of California, Riverside, community who contributed to this project include Anne Sutherland, Yolanda Moses, Susan Ossman, and Fariba Zarinebaf. In professional settings including conferences, seminars, and work spaces, I benefitted from numerous types of feedback, collaboration, and conversation that informed this project. Thanks go especially in this regard to Jessica Bodoh‐Creed, Lilith Mahmud, Robert Davis, and Edward Kasinec. I also thank Christopher C. Taylor whose undergraduate courses at the University of Alabama at Birmingham resonated with me. Funding for research and writing in southern California was provided by the University of California, Riverside, Graduate Division through the Graduate Research Mentorship Program Fellowship and the Dissertation Year Program Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turkish Extermination of Indigenous Christians – 951 Years of Religious Genocide
    The Turkish Extermination of Indigenous Christians – 951 Years of Religious Genocide 1064: Seljuk Turk 1400: Turco-Mongol 1894-1896: Turkish April 1909: Abdul 1913-1918: Talaat and 1920-1938: Mustafa Sultan Arslan’s killing of Timur’s invasion and Sultan Abdul Hamid II’s Hamid II followers’ Enver Pasha and the Kemal Atatürk in the Ani’s inhabitants in the enslavement of murder of 300,000 slaughter of 30,000 Young Turks in the destruction of 2,000+ Turkish Invasion of Armenians in the Armenians in the Armenians in the Armenian, Assyrian, churches- Eradication Anatolia (Asia Minor) Tamerlane Massacres Hamidian Massacres Adana Massacre and Greek Genocides of Christian culture Turkish propaganda tries to falsely portray the Armenian Genocide as a response to Armenian ‘uprisings’ or the threat of Russia during WWI. None of these untrue ‘excuses’ are justification for the extermination of an unarmed civilian minority by their own government – these are war crimes. But when did the Armenian Genocide start? On 24 April 1915 when more than 250 Armenian leaders from Constantinople were killed? The Genocide of Armenians started in 1064, when Alp Arslan’s Seljuk Turks invaded, destroying the Armenian capital Ani and slaughtering its people. Since then, successive massacres have reduced indigenous Christians from a majority before invasion to 20% in 1915, and to less than 1% today. Thus, the genocidal events of 1915 were just the end game against Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Christians that has lasted 951 years. WWI was just a cover for Turks, so Christian property could be stolen and Turkey could become entirely Muslim – the ‘final solution’ plan succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Armenian Genocide
    Social Education 69(6), pg 333–337 ©2005 National Council for the Social Studies A Brief History of the Armenian Genocide Sara Cohan “I am confident that the whole history of the human race con- tains no such horrible episode as this. The great massacres and persecutions of the past seem almost insignificant when compared with the sufferings of the Armenian race in 1915.” Henry Morgenthau, American ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, 1913–1916.1 Who Are the Armenians? The Armenians are an ancient people who have existed since before the first century C.E. Armenia has gained and lost a tre- mendous amount of territory throughout its long and turbulent history. Boundaries of the past have extended from that of the present-day Republic of Armenia and through most of modern day Turkey. The name “Armenia” was actually given to the country by its neighbors; inhabitants of Armenia refer to it as “Hayastan” derived from the name Haik, a descendent of Noah (from the Bible), and “stan” which means “land” in Persian. The Armenian language is unique from other Indo-European languages, with its own distinct letters and grammar. Christianity is a deeply rooted aspect of Armenian history and culture. Armenia was the first nation to adopt Christianity as a state religion, in 301 C.E. This early Christian identity has greatly influenced Armenian culture, setting it apart from most of its neighboring peoples. The majority of Armenians belong to the Eastern or Western dioceses of the Armenian Apostolic Church, an orthodox form of Christianity. Although Armenia was at times a kingdom, in modern times, Armenia has been an independent country for only a 1919: An Armenian refugee woman and her son.
    [Show full text]