DOCSLIB.ORG

Supporting Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME EL 355 105 SE 053 360 TITLE E.E.C. 2000: A Study of Environmental Education Centers. Part I and Parts II & III. INSTITUTION Minnesota State Dept. of Natural Resources, St. Paul. PUB DATE Jan 92 NOTE ..:68p.; Parts II and III are together bound in a separate volume. PUB TYPE Tests /Evaluation Instruments (160) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Definitions; Educational `_ac ".:ies; *Educational Legislation; Educational -gies; Elementary Secondary Education; *Environmental Education; *Facilities; *Long Range Planning; *Program Development; Research; State Legislation; State Surveys; Surveys; Tables (Data) IDENTIFIERS *Environmental Education Centers; Focus Group Assessment; Minnesota ABSTRACT This report of Environmental Education Centers (EECs) presents recommendations development of long range plans for the development and program coordination of EECs in Minnesota. The plan focuses on identifying programming needs, geographic areas to locate facilities, and capital costs for development and creation of a phased-in implementation plan. The report is divided into three parts that give detailed information about the process and recommendations from the project committee. Part 1 "Committee Discussion of Facility Type, Recommendations & Rationale" provides an interpretation of EEC types, six recommendations and rationale for legislative support for these facilities. The recommendations include:(1) state support for the development of an adequate number of EECs to serve all Minnesota citizens;(2) access to EECs as part of formal education for all students;(3) allocation of formal education program funding; (4) state funding for capital development and improvement of EEC facilities;(5) a grant program for EECs; and (6) a state maintained directory of EECs. Part 2 presents a summary of part 3 "Supporting Information." Part 3 provides a discussion of the data gathering process, analysis of environmental education surveys in Minnesota, facility focus group results, EEC inventory data, and private foundation funding. Appendixes to the various sections include: survey instruments, lists of focus group participants, census form of EECs in Minnesota, lists of EEC survey respondents, and EEC technical advisory committee and state agency participants. (MCO) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTERS As required by 1990 Laws of Minnesota; Chapter 610, Section 20, Article 1,Subdivision 7: "The commissioner in cooperation with other affected agencies and residential andnonresidential learning center directors shall develop a long-range plan for the developmentand program coordination of environmental learning centers statewide. The plan must focus on identifying programmingneeds, geographic areas to locate facilities, capital cost estimates for development and creation of aphased-in implementation strategy. The plan must be completed for presentation to the Legislature by January 1, 1992." Part I Parts II & III Prepared by: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Office of Planning, under the guidance of the MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY OXThis document has been reproduced as Bradley M. Moore received (tom the person or organization Environmental Education Committee originating a 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality January 1992 Points of new or opinions stated in this docu. ment do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) "Funding for this project approved by the Minnesota Legislature (LCMR Contingency Account, F.Y. 1991; M.L. 1991 Chapter 254, Sec. 14, Subd. 5(a) as recommended by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources fromthe Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund)." BEST COPY AVAILABLE E.E.C. 2000: A STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTERS Part I Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Office of Planning, under the guidance of the Environmental Education Committee January 1992 "Funding for this project approved by the Minnesota Legislature (LCMR Contingency Account, F.Y. 1991; M.L. 1991 Chapter 254, Sec. 14, Subd. 5(a) as recommended by the Legislative Commission m Minnesota Resources from the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund)." ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER STUDY Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Office of Planning, under the guidance of the Environmental Education Committee January 1992 1. A Note to the Reader ii. Committee Members' Ratification of Recommendations iii.Executive Summary Part I. Committee Discussion of Facility Type, Recommendations & Rationale I. Background II. Discussion of Facility Type, Mission, and Markets III. Recommendations IV. Capital Development & Improvement Rationale & Recommendation Details Part II. Summary of Supporting Information' Part III. Supporting Information' Section A.Discussion of Data Gathering Process Section B.Analysis of Surveys of Environmental Education in Minnesota:Residents,Teachers and Administrators Section C.Facility Focus Group Results Section D.Environmental Education Center Inventory Data Section E.Private Foundation Funding 'Note: Parts II & III of the study are contained in a separate bound volume. (.1 A Note to the Reader: For the purposes of this study, all facilities which offer environmental education services are called 'environmental education centers'. This study does not use the term 'environmental learning center' generically. Since some residential facilities are called 'environmental learning centers' the use of that term may confuse the reader when the discussion, for example, actually refers to a day-use center or other non- residential educational facility. The committee responsible for this study's recommendations defines an Environmental Education Center as: Anyfaeility other than_public or private schools, that offers proresswnai field-based-environmental instruction, either full or part-tim,e including both residential and day:use facilities. The instruction offered is designed to increase ;,:derstanding of ecological systems and of the complex interrelationships between people and nature. Environmental education centers provide experiences to assist citizens to increase their sensitivity and stewardship for the environment. Residential learning centers, nature centers, parks, zoos, camps, museums, and other specialty environmental educational facilities are included within the definition above. Environmental Education Center Study Committee Members' Ratification of Study Recommendations We the undersigned members of the Environmental Education Center Study Committee, do hereby ratify the foregoing report and recommendations as representing our best effort to address the mandates as expressed by the Minnesota Legislature in M.S. 1990 Chapter 610, Section 20, Article 1, Subdivision 7: g. Mary Pat Hamilton Science Museum of Minnesota Science Museum of Minnesota Steve Rage Jack Pichotta Minnesota Zoo Wolf Ridge ELC Eileen Kilpatrick. Minneapolis Pain Board I Lee Ann Landatrom gar. ilderer Eastman Nature Center e Conservation Center Mike Link Siah St. Clair Northwood, Audubon Center Springbrook Nature Center )etx"112,P7*-air a227/z4. --- Kurt Marple Kathleen Wallace Camp Courage ELC Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation "91 Greg Munidn Quarry Hill Nab re Center Environmental Education Center Study Executive Summary Part I. Committee Discussion of Facility Type, Recommendations & Ration ale This portion of the study provides the committee's interpretation of environmental education center types and recommendations for legislative support for these facilities which is needed to provide quality environmental education in Minnesota. For the purposes of the study and recommendations, committee members placed environmental education centers into three major categories: 1) Day Use Centers (Nature Centers & Parks); 2) Museums, Zoos, & Special Emphasis Facilities; and, 3) Residential Facilities (Environmental Learning Centers & Camps). The general missions of these facility types, as well as their major markets,are discussed in Part I as well. Committee members developed and agreed on six recommendations for legislative consideration: 1) The state should support the development ofan adequate number of environmental education centers to serve all Minnesota citizens. 2) All students should have access to an environmental education center as a part of their formal education. 3) The state should allocate $12 per student peryear for environmental education ceLter experiences from the current state school aid formula to schools. 4) The state should provide funding for phased-in capital development and improvement of environmental education facilities. (Request totals 83.76 million dollars phased in over four biennia- see Part I, page 11). 5) The state should establish a biennial $4 million programming grant program for environmental education centers. 6) The Department of Education should compile and maintain a directory of environmental education centers and distribute it to schools and other interested parties across the state. Part I of the study provides details and
Recommended publications
  • Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness T R I P P L a N N I N G G U I D E

    Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness T R I P P L a N N I N G G U I D E

    BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA WILDERNESS T RIP P LANNING G UIDE Your BWCAW Adventure Starts Here… Share the Experience, Peter Nelson GREAT GLACIERS carved the physical Provincial Parks and is bordered on the What’s Inside… features of what is today known as west by Voyageurs National Park. The Page 2 . Planning your BWCAW Trip the Boundary Waters Canoe Area BWCAW contains over 1200 miles of Page 2 . Superior National Forest Wilderness (BWCAW) by scraping and canoe routes, 12 hiking trails and over Recreation Alternatives gouging rock. The glaciers left behind 2000 designated campsites. This area was Page 3 . Reservation & Permit Basics Page 4 . Leave No Trace rugged cliffs and crags, canyons, gentle set aside in 1926 to preserve its primitive Page 5 . BWCAW Rules and Regulations hills, towering rock formations, rocky character and made a part of the Page 6 – 7 . Smart and Safe Wilderness shores, sandy beaches and thousands National Wilderness Preservation System Travel Page 8-9 ����������� BWCAW Entry Points of lakes and streams, interspersed with in 1964 with subsequent legislation in Page 10 . The BWCAW Past and Present islands and surrounded by forest. 1978. Page 10 . The BWCAW Act The BWCAW is a unique area Wilderness offers freedom to those Page 11 . Fire in the Wilderness located in the northern third of the who wish to pursue an experience Page 12 – 13 . Protecting Your Natural Resources Superior National Forest in northeastern of expansive solitude, challenge and Page 14 . Special Uses Minnesota. Over 1 million acres in personal connection with nature. The Page 15 . Youth Activity Page size, it extends nearly 150 miles along BWCAW allows visitors to canoe, Page 16 .
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85

    Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85

    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
  • Wilderness Adventures for Teens

    Wilderness Adventures for Teens

    YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES NON-PROFIT YMCA CAMP MENOGYN ORGANIZATION 651 NICOLLET MALL, SUITE 500 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILDERNESS YMCA TWIN CITIES, MN ADVENTURES FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ® NEW CAMPER INFORMATION NIGHT FOR HEALTHY LIVING FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 2019 FOR TEENS 7–8 PM REI, Bloomington YMCA CAMP MENOGYN 2019 Summer Schedule “Like” us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit us at campmenogyn.org Have a question? Contact us at 612-822-2267 Email us at: [email protected] 17-GE07 YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities is a not-for-profit 501c3 organization. campmenogyn.org 25% RECYCLED MATERIALS USED OUR MISSION Founded in 1922, YMCA Camp Menogyn’s mission is to provide transformational experiences in a wilderness setting emphasizing quality, personal growth, and relationships. Our summer program focuses on canoeing, backpacking, and rock-climbing adventures for young people ages 12 – 18. The name Menogyn has roots in the Ojibwe language relating to the full and healthy growth of the important crop Manoomin, or wild rice. Just as the growth of wild rice is vital for the Ojibwe community, the growth and development of our youth is vital to our global community. At Menogyn, teens are provided with unique and powerful ways to learn and care about themselves, about others, and about the world. At Menogyn campers explore the wild landscapes of North America, from the Boundary Waters to Alaska, they grow as individuals and as members of a welcoming and diverse community. Menogyn lives by the core values of the YMCA of caring, honesty, respect, and responsibility.
  • REVISOR Xx:KJ/KJ 06-5420

    REVISOR Xx:KJ/KJ 06-5420

    01119/06 REVISOR xx:KJ/KJ 06-5420 Senator Ruud introduced- S.F. No. 2377: Referred to the Committee on Taxes. 1.1 A bill for an act relating to taxation; authorizing the town of Sylvan in Cass County to impose 1.3 a gravel tax under certain circumstances; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, 1.4 section 298. 75, by adding a subdivision. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 298.75, is amended.by adding a 1, 1.7 subdivision to read: 1.8 . Subd. 10. Tax may be imposed; Cass County. (a) If Cass1County does not im~e v "-V'.tll 4'..-lf~ -.,.p~ve~ f!M..pe>Si-h<n'\ b-ift -fk.e ~ tMA.tl&Y - s S'l.A..bJlY\s~ 1.9 a tax under this section, the town of Sylvan in Cass County may ~pose the aggregate 1.10 materials tax under this section. 1.11 (b) For purposes of exercising the powers contained in this section,. the "town" is 2 deemed to be the "county." 1.13 ( c) All provisions in this section apply to the town of Sylvan, except that, in lieu 1.14 of the distribution of the tax proceeds under subdivision 7, all proceeds of the tax .must 1.15 be retained by the town. 1.16 ( d) If Cass County imposes an aggregate materials tax under this section, the tax 1.17 imposed by the town of Sylvan under this subdivision is repealed on the effective date 1.18 of the Cass County tax.
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf

    Minnesota State Parks.Pdf

    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
  • Tettegouche State Park Visitor Center and Mndot Class 1 Safety Rest Area

    Tettegouche State Park Visitor Center and Mndot Class 1 Safety Rest Area

    Tettegouche State Park Visitor Center and MnDOT Class 1 Safety Rest Area Highlights The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota Department of Transportation are pleased to present the new Tettegouche State Park Visitor Center and Class 1 Safety Rest Area. The shared facility includes a new building, parking facilities and site amenities to complement the natural setting of the landscape. The new site design improves pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation. Building and Grounds: • 11,000-square-foot, fully accessible space (similar in size to the Interpretive Center at Gooseberry Falls State Park) and meets current safety standards. • Expanded restroom facilities open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. • 750-square-foot exhibit space with interpretive panels to help visitors learn about the historical and cultural significance of the area. • Amphitheater. • Gift shop, open area picnic shelter, lakeside patio, and enclosed front porch. • Meeting spaces and multi-purpose room for interpretive programming, as well as community meetings and functions. • Rain garden and storm water management improvements. Energy and Landscape Features: • 24.3 KW photovoltaic array (which is expected to generate 36% of the building’s energy needs). • Energy efficient building design made with sustainable forest products, high efficiency windows, and structural insulated panel (SIP) walls and roof. LED lighting and high-efficiency fixtures are employed throughout the building, parking lots and entrance drive. Safety and Usage: • In 1986, Tettegouche became the first combined state park and safety rest area in the state. It was followed by a partnership at Gooseberry Falls State Park in 1996, and then a similar facility at Grand Portage State Park in 2010.
  • State Park CONTENTS 1

    State Park CONTENTS 1

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 7/22/91 State Park CONTENTS 1 I. Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------2 Park Description---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ·---------------------2 Advisory Committee---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 The Law -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 II. Regional Analysis ---------------------------------------------------7 The Surrounding A:re,a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Supply and Demand of Recreational Facilities -------------------------------------------------------------10 ID. Park Resources----------------------------------------------------11 Resource Mariagement Objectives --------------------------------------------------------------------------11 Climate -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 Geology ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 Soils---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 Vegetation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18
  • 2017 World Camp Age 10-17; Hudson, Wi, Usa; July 8 - August 5; $2675 Program Overview

    2017 World Camp Age 10-17; Hudson, Wi, Usa; July 8 - August 5; $2675 Program Overview

    YMCA CAMP ST CROIX 2017 WORLD CAMP AGE 10-17; HUDSON, WI, USA; JULY 8 - AUGUST 5; $2675 PROGRAM OVERVIEW Camp St. Croix draws dozens of youth from around the The YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities: globe, both American ex-patriots and foreign nationals, A Global Center of Excellence to Hudson each summer. While here, international As a Global Center of Excellence Y, the YMCA of campers experience the best that St. Croix offers and the Twin Cities is committed to international spend their weekends in homestays experiencing youth development work; we want to do our American culture (like the Mall of America and Twins part to instill the Y’s values of caring, honesty, Baseball). respect and responsibility in young people the world around. Some participants come as individuals, flying by themselves to Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport where they are picked up at the gate by St. Croix staff. Others come in groups, with multiple participants coming from partnering organizations, commonly YMCAs, overseas. Throughout their time at Camp, international campers are supported by third-culture kid competent staff and surrounded by both American and international staff (one-fifth of our staff are from overseas). They are able to phone home once a week during their stay and we scan and email written communications daily. At Camp all participants are immersed in the English Language. While Elementary Proficiency is required, World Camp participation is a great way for non-native English speakers to reach fluency. WORLD CAMP PROGRAM OVERVIEW 1 YMCA CAMP ST CROIX 2017 WORLD CAMP PROGRAM OVERVIEW Depending on their age, campers take part in either International Staff Traditional, Adventure, or Leadership Development Program Roughly a fifth of St.
  • Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota

    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota

    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance A 25-year long-range plan for Minnesota February 14, 2011 ©2011, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This information is available in a different format upon request of persons of all abilities. February 14, 2011 It is our pleasure to introduce the Parks and Trails Minnesotans will look back and say the Parks and Legacy Plan. Funding created by the Legacy Trails Legacy Amendment accomplished what they Amendment gives us a unique opportunity to hoped for—and more. improve and expand Minnesota’s parks and trails of state and regional significance. This allows us to The plan recognizes the world‑class network of look out 25 years to envision a future in which parks parks and trails Minnesota currently has in place. It and trails play a significant role in the lives of all proposes to build on this foundation, making user Minnesotans. experiences even better. It is based on four strategic directions that together ensure a great future for parks Our extensive 18-month public engagement effort and trails: allows us to confidently state that this is a parks and • Connect people and the outdoors.
  • Of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd

    Of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd

    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Additional Information / Feedback ID Subd. Title Organization Program Manager Prairie Butterfly Conservation, Research and 009‐A 03c Breeding ‐ Phase 2 Minnesota Zoological Garden Erik Runquist Techniques for Water Storage Estimates in Central 018‐A 04i Minnesota U of MN John Neiber Restoring Native Mussels for Cleaner Streams and 036‐B 04c Lakes MN DNR Mike Davis 037‐B 04a Tracking and Preventing Harmful Algal Blooms Science Museum of Minnesota Daniel Engstrom Assessing the Increasing Harmful Algal Blooms in U of MN ‐ St. Anthony Falls 038‐B 04b Minnesota Lakes Laboratory Miki Hondzo Assessment of Surface Water Quality With Satellite 047‐B 04j Sensors U of MN Jacques Finlay Surface Water Bacterial Treatment System Pilot Vadnais Lake Area Water 088‐B 04u Project Management Organization Brian Corcoran Improving Outdoor Classrooms for Education and 091‐C 05b Recreation MN DNR Amy Kay Kerber Hydrogen Fuel from Wind Produced Renewable 141‐E 07f Ammonia U of MN Will Northrop Center for Energy and 144‐E 07d Geotargeted Distributed Clean Energy Initiative Environment Carl Nelson Utilization of Dairy Farm Wastewater for 148‐E 07g Sustainable Production U of MN Bradley Heins Solar Energy Utilization for Minnesota Swine Farms U of MN ‐ West Central Research 149‐E 07h – Phase 2 and Outreach Center Lee Johnston Establishment of Permanent Habitat Strips Within 154‐F 08c Row Crops Science Museum of Minnesota Shawn Schottler 174‐G 09a State Parks and State Trails Land Acquisitions MN DNR Jennifer Christie 180‐G 09e Wilder Forest Acquisition Minnesota Food Association Hilary Otey Wold Lincoln Pipestone Rural Water System Acquisition Lincoln Pipestone Rural Water 181‐G 09f for Well Head Protection System Jason Overby Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item: 05 ENRTF ID: 009-A / Subd.
  • HOCP Case St

    HOCP Case St

    Working TOGETHER to SUSTAIN and CELEBRATE the LAKES, FORESTS and COMMUNITIES In the border lakes region. Who We Are MISSION The Heart of the Continent The Heart of the Continent Partnership (HOCP) is a Partnership works to Canadian-American coalition inclusively build vibrant and of land managers and local resilient communities that stakeholders working together value and protect public lands on cross-border projects that in northeastern Minnesota and promote the economic, northwestern Ontario. cultural and natural health of the lakes, forests and communities on the Minnesota-Ontario border. SHARED VALUES Within this broad coalition, The success of the Heart of the High Falls, Pigeon River Provincial Park Continent Partnership (HOCP) HOCP is developing a is based in trust and a fair, open common identity and sense of hectares (five million acres) economic stability for the communications. belonging to the larger of public lands. Along with communities that surround the development of a these public lands. The Partnership is a cross-border area, the Heart common identity is the desire non-partisan forum where of the Continent, which to create and sustain diverse groups can meet and consists of over two million work together. The partnership does not take positions nor The Need for the Heart of the Continent Partnership attempt to influence the Because the Heart of the lines, even an international Cooperative leadership policies of participants, other Continent ecosystem is an border. These divisions have among the Heart of the than celebrating support for interconnected whole, a historically posed barriers to Continent Partnership is our public lands and our region-wide vision is collaboration.
  • Minnesota Statutes 2017, Section 85.054

    Minnesota Statutes 2017, Section 85.054

    1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 85.054 85.054 STATE PARK PERMIT EXEMPTIONS. Subdivision 1. State Park Open House Day. (a) A state park permit is not required for a motor vehicle to enter a state park, state monument, state recreation area, or state wayside, on one day each calendar year at each park, which the commissioner may designate as State Park Open House Day. The commissioner may designate two consecutive days as State Park Open House Day, if the open house is held in conjunction with a special pageant described in section 85.052, subdivision 2. (b) The commissioner shall announce the date of each State Park Open House Day at least 30 days in advance of the date it occurs. (c) The State Park Open House Day is to acquaint the public with state parks, recreation areas, and waysides. Subd. 2. Fort Snelling Memorial Chapel Island. A state park permit is not required and a fee may not be charged for motor vehicle entry or parking at the Fort Snelling Memorial Chapel Island portion of Fort Snelling State Park. Subd. 3. [Repealed, 2008 c 357 s 40] Subd. 4. Jay Cooke State Park. A state park permit is not required and a fee must not be charged for motor vehicle entry or parking at the Veterans Memorial scenic overlook portion of Jay Cooke State Park. Subd. 5. Gooseberry Falls State Park. A state park permit is not required and a fee must not be charged for motor vehicle entry or parking at the Class I highway rest area parking lot located adjacent to marked Trunk Highway 61 and the Gooseberry River at Gooseberry Falls State Park.