DOCSLIB.ORG

Markers for Detection of Prostate Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Markers for Detection of Prostate Cancer Cancers 2010, 2, 1125-1154; doi:10.3390/cancers2021125 OPEN ACCESS cancers ISSN 2072-6694 www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Review Markers for Detection of Prostate Cancer Raymond A. Clarke 1, Horst J. Schirra 2, James W. Catto 3, Martin F. Lavin 4,5 and Robert A. Gardiner 5,* 1 Prostate Cancer Institute, Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital Clinical School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD, 4072, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Academic Urology Unit and Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Radiation Biology and Oncology, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 22 March 2010; in revised form: 2 June 2010 / Accepted: 3 June 2010 / Published: 4 June 2010 Abstract: Early detection of prostate cancer is problematic, not just because of uncertainly whether a diagnosis will benefit an individual patient, but also as a result of the imprecise and invasive nature of establishing a diagnosis by biopsy. Despite its low sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients harbouring prostate cancer, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) has become established as the most reliable and widely-used diagnostic marker for this condition. In its wake, many other markers have been described and evaluated. This review focuses on the supporting evidence for the most prominent of these for detection and also for predicting outcome in prostate cancer. Keywords: prostate cancer; biomarker; detection Cancers 2010, 2 1126 1. Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) is now the most commonly diagnosed internal cancer in the western world and the second most lethal male malignancy. Prior to clinical availability of a blood test for prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the mid 1980s, most PCa patients were diagnosed with more advanced disease. Advances in surgical and radiation therapies now result in cure for a proportion of patients who would not have benefitted from combination PSA/digital rectal examination (DRE)-based detection in the past. However, from a public health perspective, indiscriminate PSA population screening cannot be justified because of the low sensitivity and specificity of this blood test in identifying cancer, amongst other concerns [1]. Furthermore, there is prevailing uncertainty on the basis of the PSA blood test as to who will benefit from treatment with curative intent [2–5]. Recognition of these shortcomings has focussed research into markers to detect the presence of PCa and, more importantly, to try to discriminate between those patients harbouring indolent as opposed to aggressive disease including those for whom any form of local therapy will not prevent subsequent declaration of metastases. There is a clinical imperative in being able to identify those who do and do not have PCa since, apart from the obvious advantage from detecting and treating the condition at the earliest stage possible, the diagnostic process itself is not without its problems. Suspicion of the presence of PCa, alerted as a result of an abnormal serum PSA and/or and abnormal DRE, requires an invasive procedure to provide histological confirmation with biopsies (usually >12) almost always obtained via imaging with a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe to ensure spatial positioning of biopsy needles. The majority of men who have prostatic biopsies do not have PCa diagnosed but continue to have raised serum PSA levels with ongoing concerns of a possible undetected PCa due to the imprecise nature of both the PSA test and TRUS biopsies. US Medicare-SEER analyses 1993 to 2001 indicated that, among men whose first recorded biopsy did not detect cancer, the likelihood of undergoing subsequent biopsies was 11.6% at 1 year and 38% at 5 years [6]. In addition, although the dreaded complication of life-threatening sepsis is fortunately uncommon but reported to be increasing [7], ~50% experience lesser symptoms after TRUS biopsy so diagnosing PCa remains problematic for many reasons. Consequently, it is not surprising that the need to be able to detect prostate cancer by a simple and reliable approach which can be repeated easily over time, is a diagnostic priority in the western world. 2. Scope of the Review The strengths and weaknesses of PSA in the detection of PCa have been examined and published extensively and, since the topic has been reviewed very recently by Roobol et al. [8], who comprehensively examined the relevant medical literature with respect to the risk of developing PCa, this dissertation will not re-visit this marker. These authors reported that, despite its limitations, published evidence indicates that total serum PSA is the single most significant clinically-used predictive factor for identifying men at increased risk for PCa. Total PSA was superior to percentage free PSA, PSA velocity and Human kallikrein 2 (hK2), the most studied kallikrein protein after PSA (hK3) itself. A suspicious DRE, a family history of PCa, the presence of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) and black ethnicity Cancers 2010, 2 1127 also were reported to be important predictive factors. For men of screening age (50 to 70 years) a serum PSA of greater than 1.5 ng/mL has been found to indicate a greater than average risk up to 8 years (7.5-times greater risk vs. 1.5 ng/mL or less) for developing PCa [8]. In terms of diagnosing established PCa, PSA cut-offs are useful with the likelihood of men harbouring PCa greater the higher the level of serum PSA. However, it is important to note that PSA is a continuous variable and that a proportion of patients with low serum PSA levels <4 ng/mL have PCa of clinical significance [9]. Histological interpretation too has advanced with the Gleason scoring criteria agreed upon at the WHO ISUP consensus meeting in 2005 [10,11] being more useful clinically than those criteria with Gleason grading used previously. Much has been published in the Uro-pathology literature in relation to histological nuances in addition to describing a range of tissue biomarkers for PCa characterisation. These include apoptotic factors such as p53 and Bcl-2, the androgen receptor (AR), signal transduction factors within the EGF receptor family, cell cycle regulators exemplified by c-Myc, p16, p27, pRb and Ki67, cell adhesion and cohesion factors and factors involved in neo-angiogenesis, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptors and nitric oxide [12,13] Histopathology will not be addressed further nor will imaging adjuncts to biopsy. However, in interpreting the value of diagnostic biomarkers from biological fluids, which is the subject of this review, accurate histology and appropriate targeting with biopsy needles are essential. It is particularly important to be aware that the diagnostic biopsy reference on which biological fluid biomarkers are judged is deficient, varying with sites targeted and numbers of biopsies obtained, ranging in one study from 31.7% for sextant biopsies to 38.7%, 41.5%, and 42.5% for 12, 18 and 21 cores respectively in a study of 1000 patients [14]. Accurately determining the presence of disease is surprisingly difficult. Autopsy studies permit exhaustive and comprehensive scrutiny of the prostate histologically but are flawed in terms of clinical relevance for epidemiological reasons. True incidence derived from more epidemiologically-vetted clinical trials is almost non-existent given the rarity of complete cross-sectional ‘end of study biopsies’. Sakr found in autopsy studies that, for the third through to the eighth decades of life, the incidence of PCa in a cohort of 1051 subjects was 7, 23, 39, 44, 65 and 72% [15]. Haas et al. [16] performed 18 core biopsies on autopsy prostates from 164 men who had no history of PCa. They reported that six-core biopsies were taken from each of the mid peripheral zone (MPZ), the lateral peripheral zone (LPZ), and the central zone (CZ). PCa was present in 47 (29%) prostates. Of the 47 cancers detected, 20 were clinically significant according to histologic criteria. Biopsies from the CZ did not detect any cancer that was not present in biopsies from either the MPZ or LPZ. The sensitivities of biopsies from the MPZ for clinically significant and insignificant cancer were 55% (95% CI = 32% to 77%) and 11%, respectively, compared with 80% and 33% for those from the MPZ and LPZ combined. In a single institutional study, Djavan et al. [17] found in an assessment of repeat biopsies that PCa was present in 22% (231/1051), 10% (83/820), 5% (36/737) and 5% (4/94) of first, second, third and fourth biopsies. Together with others, these studies illustrate the fact that the reference by which the sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers are judged is well short of perfect and this deficiency also should be borne in mind in assessing the predictive values of potential biomarkers. Cancers 2010, 2 1128 3. Sources for Biomarker Analyses A number of tissue/fluid sources and approaches have been employed in the quest to develop a non- invasive diagnostic test for PCa. These range from analysing tears [18] to changes in the odour of urine detected by dogs [19] but, in terms of commonly studied sources, prostatic fluid and blood have received most attention. Patient acceptance of venesection for taking samples of blood (for analysis as whole blood or serum) and providing urine is extremely high and laboratory staff are so conversant with the properties of both that they do not warrant detailed discussion in this manuscript.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer
    AHRQ Healthcare Horizon Scanning System – Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA290201000006C Prepared by: ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 December 2012 Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA290201000006C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This report’s content should not be construed as either endorsements or rejections of specific interventions. As topics are entered into the System, individual topic profiles are developed for technologies and programs that appear to be close to diffusion into practice in the United States. Those reports are sent to various experts with clinical, health systems, health administration, and/or research backgrounds for comment and opinions about potential for impact. The comments and opinions received are then considered and synthesized by ECRI Institute to identify interventions that experts deemed, through the comment process, to have potential for high impact. Please see the methods section for more details about this process. This report is produced twice annually and topics included may change depending on expert comments received on interventions issued for comment during the preceding 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Glycosylation: Rising Potential for Prostate Cancer Evaluation
    cancers Review Glycosylation: Rising Potential for Prostate Cancer Evaluation Anna Kałuza˙ * , Justyna Szczykutowicz and Mirosława Ferens-Sieczkowska Department of Chemistry and Immunochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Sklodowskiej-Curie 48/50, 50-369 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.F.-S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-770-30-66 Simple Summary: Aberrant protein glycosylation is a well-known hallmark of cancer and is as- sociated with differential expression of enzymes such as glycosyltransferases and glycosidases. The altered expression of the enzymes triggers cancer cells to produce glycoproteins with specific cancer-related aberrations in glycan structures. Increasing number of data indicate that glycosylation patterns of PSA and other prostate-originated proteins exert a potential to distinguish between benign prostate disease and cancer as well as among different stages of prostate cancer development and aggressiveness. This review summarizes the alterations in glycan sialylation, fucosylation, truncated O-glycans, and LacdiNAc groups outlining their potential applications in non-invasive diagnostic procedures of prostate diseases. Further research is desired to develop more general algorithms exploiting glycobiology data for the improvement of prostate diseases evaluation. Abstract: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among men. Alterations in protein glycosylation are confirmed to be a reliable hallmark of cancer. Prostate-specific antigen is the biomarker that is used most frequently for prostate cancer detection, although its lack of sensitivity and specificity results in many unnecessary biopsies. A wide range of glycosylation alterations in Citation: Kałuza,˙ A.; Szczykutowicz, prostate cancer cells, including increased sialylation and fucosylation, can modify protein function J.; Ferens-Sieczkowska, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Genitourinary Pathology (Including Renal Tumors)
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION THE BASIC AND TRANSLATIONAL PATHOLOGY RESEARCH JOURNAL LI VOLUME 99 | SUPPLEMENT 1 | MARCH 2019 2019 ABSTRACTS GENITOURINARY PATHOLOGY (INCLUDING RENAL TUMORS) (776-992) MARCH 16-21, 2019 PLATF OR M & 2 01 9 ABSTRACTS P OSTER PRESENTATI ONS EDUCATI ON C O M MITTEE Jason L. Hornick , C h air Ja mes R. Cook R h o n d a K. Y a nti s s, Chair, Abstract Revie w Board S ar a h M. Dr y and Assign ment Co m mittee Willi a m C. F a q ui n Laura W. La mps , Chair, C ME Subco m mittee C ar ol F. F ar v er St e v e n D. Billi n g s , Interactive Microscopy Subco m mittee Y uri F e d ori w Shree G. Shar ma , Infor matics Subco m mittee Meera R. Ha meed R aj a R. S e et h al a , Short Course Coordinator Mi c h ell e S. Hir s c h Il a n W ei nr e b , Subco m mittee for Unique Live Course Offerings Laksh mi Priya Kunju D a vi d B. K a mi n s k y ( Ex- Of ici o) A n n a M ari e M ulli g a n Aleodor ( Doru) Andea Ri s h P ai Zubair Baloch Vi nita Parkas h Olca Bast urk A nil P ar w a ni Gregory R. Bean , Pat h ol o gist-i n- Trai ni n g D e e p a P atil D a ni el J.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded Uniformly Processed RNA-Seq Datasets from 3,764,506 High-Throughput Sequencing Samples from Skymap in Raw Count Format19
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 28 April 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202003.0360.v2 TMPRSS2 transcriptional inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 Xinchen Wang, Ph.D.1*, Ryan S. Dhindsa, Ph.D.1,2, Gundula Povysil, M.D., Ph.D.1, Anthony Zoghbi, M.D.1,3,4, Joshua E. Motelow, M.D., Ph.D.1,5, Joseph A. Hostyk, B.Sc.1, Nicholas Nickols, M.D. Ph.D.6,7, Matthew Rettig, M.D.8,9, David B. Goldstein, Ph.D.1,2* 1Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, 2Department of Genetics & Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, 3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York 4New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 5Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York 6Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California 8Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles 9Division of Hematology and Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California *To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] (X.W.), [email protected] (D.B.G.) Abstract There is an urgent need to identify effective therapies for COVID-19. The SARS-CoV-2 host factor protease TMPRSS2 is required for viral entry and thus an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • CREB3L2-Pparg Fusion Mutation Identifies a Thyroid Signaling Pathway Regulated by Intramembrane Proteolysis
    Research Article CREB3L2-PPARg Fusion Mutation Identifies a Thyroid Signaling Pathway Regulated by Intramembrane Proteolysis Weng-Onn Lui,3 Lingchun Zeng,1 Victoria Rehrmann,1 Seema Deshpande,5 Maria Tretiakova,1 Edwin L. Kaplan,2 Ingo Leibiger,3 Barbara Leibiger,3 Ulla Enberg,3 Anders Ho¨o¨g,4 Catharina Larsson,3 and Todd G. Kroll1 Departments of 1Pathology and 2Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Departments of 3Molecular Medicine and Surgery and 4Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; and 5Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia Abstract cancer in patients; and (c) the implementation of effective molecular-targeted chemotherapies that have relatively few side The discovery of gene fusion mutations, particularly in effects. The discovery of fusion mutations is therefore important, leukemia, has consistently identified new cancer pathways particularly in carcinoma, the most common cancer group in and led to molecular diagnostic assays and molecular-targeted which few gene fusions have been identified (1). The recent chemotherapies for cancer patients. Here, we report our discoveries of ERG (2) and ALK (3) gene fusions in prostate and discovery of a novel CREB3L2-PPARg fusion mutation in lung carcinoma, respectively, increase the prospect that new thyroid carcinoma with t(3;7)(p25;q34), showing that a family diagnostic and therapeutic strategies based on gene fusions will of somatic PPARg fusion mutations exist in thyroid cancer. The be applicable to common epithelial cancers. CREB3L2-PPARg fusion encodes a CREB3L2-PPAR; fusion Families of gene fusions tend to characterize specific cancer protein that is composed of the transactivation domain of types.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Clinical Testing of Individual Immunoassays for the Quantification of Serum Glycoproteins to Diagnose Prostate Cancer
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Development and clinical testing of individual immunoassays for the quantification of serum glycoproteins to diagnose prostate cancer Kathrin Endt1, Jens Goepfert2, Aurelius Omlin3, Alcibiade Athanasiou1, Pierre Tennstedt4, Anna Guenther2, Maurizio Rainisio5, Daniel S. Engeler3, Thomas Steuber4, Silke Gillessen3, Thomas Joos2, Ralph Schiess1* a1111111111 a1111111111 1 ProteoMediX Inc., Schlieren, Switzerland, 2 NMI TuÈbingen, Reutlingen, Germany, 3 Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 4 Martini-Klinik, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, 5 Abanovus LLC, a1111111111 Sanremo, Italy a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis is currently hampered by the high false-positive rate of Citation: Endt K, Goepfert J, Omlin A, Athanasiou PSA evaluations, which consequently may lead to overtreatment. Non-invasive methods A, Tennstedt P, Guenther A, et al. (2017) with increased specificity and sensitivity are needed to improve diagnosis of significant Development and clinical testing of individual immunoassays for the quantification of serum PCa. We developed and technically validated four individual immunoassays for cathepsin glycoproteins to diagnose prostate cancer. PLoS D (CTSD), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4), and throm- ONE 12(8): e0181557. https://doi.org/10.1371/ bospondin 1 (THBS1). These glycoproteins, previously identified by mass spectrometry journal.pone.0181557 using a Pten mouse model, were measured in clinical serum samples for testing the capabil- Editor: Salvatore V Pizzo, Duke University School ity of discriminating PCa positive and negative samples. The development yielded 4 individ- of Medicine, UNITED STATES ual immunoassays with inter and intra-variability (CV) <15% and linearity on dilution of the Received: March 8, 2017 analytes. In serum, ex vivo protein stability (<15% loss of analyte) was achieved for a dura- Accepted: July 3, 2017 tion of at least 24 hours at room temperature and 2 days at 4ÊC.
    [Show full text]
  • Urinary Biomarkers for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    The Prostate Urinary Biomarkers for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Patients With High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia Tamara Sequeiros,1 Juan M. Bastaros, 2 Milagros Sanchez, 1 Marina Rigau,1 Melania Montes,1 Jose Placer,2 Jaques Planas,2 Ines de Torres,3 Jaume Reventos, 1,4,5 D. Michiel Pegtel,6 Andreas Doll,1,4 Juan Morote,1,2 and Mireia Olivan1* 1Group of Biomedical Research in Urology, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain 2Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain 3Department of Pathology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain 4Departament de Ciencies Basiques, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain 5IDIBELL- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain 6Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands INTRODUCTION. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a recognized precursor stage of PCa. Men who present HGPIN in a first prostate biopsy face years of active surveillance including repeat biopsies. This study aimed to identify non-invasive prognostic biomarkers that differentiate early on between indolent HGPIN cases and those that will transform into actual PCa. METHODS. We measured the expression of 21 candidate mRNA biomarkers using quantitative PCR in urine sediment samples from a cohort of 90 patients with initial diagnosis of HGPIN and a posterior follow up of at least two years. Uni- and multivariate statistical analyses were applied to analyze the candidate biomarkers and multiplex models using combinations of these biomarkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostate Prostate Cancer Overview and Recent Advances: Overview
    Prostate Cancer Overview and Recent Advances: How Can a Common Disease Be So Controversial? Howard I. Scher, M.D. D. Wayne Calloway Chair in Urologic Oncology Chie f, Gen itouri nary Oncol ogy Servi ce Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center March 27, 2010 Prostate Cancer Overview and Recent Advances: How Can a Common Disease Be So Controversial? 1. The statistics : The pendulum is swinging. 2. A framework: 3. Risk adapted diagnostics: 4. Risk adapted prognostics to guide treatment: Page 1 2009 Cancer Statistics Estimated New Cases Estimated Deaths Jemal A, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225-249. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates age adjusted, standardized over time Thun MJ et al. Cancer Statistics 2009. CA Cancer J Clin2009;59;225. Page 2 In an Aging Population, the Implications of “Detecting” And “Diagnosing” All Prostate Cancers Is Clear From Scardino and Kelman. Dr. Peter Scardino’s Prostate Book. Avery Press, 2005 (www.theprostatebook.com) The prostate produces seminal fluid that protects sperm. External Urinary Sphincter From Scardino and Kelman. Avery Press, 2005 (www.theprostatebook.com) Page 3 The Disease Usually Starts in the Peripheral Zone and is Often Multifocal, That May Limit the Role for Therapies That Do Not Treat the Whole Gland From Scardino and Kelman. Dr. Peter Scardino’s Prostate Book. Avery Press, 2005 (www.theprostatebook.com) Screening, Early Detection and Diagnosis: The Harder You Look, the More You Will Find From Scardino and Kelman. The Prostate Book. Avery Press, 2005 (www.theprostatebook.com) Page 4 TNM Staging 1. Characterizes disease at the time of diagnosis: Localized disease: TNM (+PSA) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcome Using a PCA3-Based Nomogram in a Polish Cohort
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 33: 553-558 (2013) Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcome Using a PCA3-based Nomogram in a Polish Cohort MACIEJ SALAGIERSKI1, PETER MULDERS2 and JACK A. SCHALKEN2 1Urology Department, Medical University of Łódź, Poland; 2Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Abstract. Background: Prostate Cancer Gene-3 (PCA3) is prostate tissues (1). As a consequence, the PCA3 gene, being highly prostate cancer (PCa)-specific and its application highly overexpressed in specific PCa cell lines and prostatic holds promise in identifying men with PCa. Aim: To tumors, constitutes today the most PCa-specific marker (2). determine whether the PCA3 score can be used relative to The urine Progensa PCA3 test (Gen-Probe, San Diego, PCa clinical variables to predict biopsy outcome. Patients CA, USA) has been clinically available since 2006. The and Methods: PCA3 scores were assessed in a group of 80 Progensa PCA3 assay is a non-invasive and highly specific patients using the Progensa assay (Gen-Probe, San Diego, test, which measures the expression of the PCA3 gene and CA, USA). The logistic regression algorithm was used to PSA mRNA concentrations in post-DRE urine. In many combine PCA3 results with the established biopsy risk factors studies, the PCA3 test was superior to PSA for the early including: age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal detection of PCa. The assay has been shown to be examination (DRE) and prostate volume (Pvol). Results: In particularly useful in patients with a previous negative univariate analyses, the Progensa PCA3 score outperformed biopsies and persistently elevated PSA levels (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • In Prostate Cancer
    l ch cina em di is e tr M y Shen et al., Med chem 2014, 4:11 Medicinal chemistry DOI: 10.4172/2161-0444.1000220 ISSN: 2161-0444 Revie Article Open Access Roles of Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) in Prostate Cancer Chengwu Shen1, Jing Zhang1, Mei Qi2, Yannicca WYChang3 and Bo Han2,4* 1Department of Pharmacy, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250021 China 2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China 3Department of Health and Disease and Psychology, University of Tornoto, Markham, Canada 4Department of Pathology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China Abstract Altered genes that play a driving role in cancer development can often serve as specific diagnostic markers, criteria of molecular classification and therefore potential therapeutic targets. Serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), also known as pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor or tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor, encodes a 56 amino acid secreted peptide, and its normal function is thought to be the inhibition of serine proteases such as trypsin. Recent studies have indicated marked overexpression of SPINK1 defines an aggressive molecular subtype of ETS (erythroblastosis virus E26 transformation-specific) fusion-negative prostate cancer ((PCa) patients. SPINK1 may act as an autocrine growth factor and promotes PCa growth and invasion. Most recently, we suggested that SPINK1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through EGFR signaling pathway in PCa. The association between SPINK1 overexpression and poor prognosis in PCa has been reported. Notably, SPINK1 might be a novel extracellular therapeutic target in a subset of high-grade PCa patients. In this review, we will summarize the current understanding of SPINK1 involving its role in PCa biology, association with prognosis as well as perspective in therapy from the pathologist's point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rationale for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in a Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Approach to COVID-19
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Rationale for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in a Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Approach to COVID-19 Alessandro Bellis 1 , Ciro Mauro 1, Emanuele Barbato 2, Bruno Trimarco 2 and Carmine Morisco 2,* 1 Unità Operativa Complessa Cardiologia con UTIC ed Emodinamica-Dipartimento Emergenza Accettazione, Azienda Ospedaliera “Antonio Cardarelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università FEDERICO II, 80131 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (B.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-081-746-2253; Fax: +39-081-746-2256 Received: 12 October 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 15 November 2020 Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) determines the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) down-regulation and related decrease in angiotensin II degradation. Both these events trigger “cytokine storm” leading to acute lung and cardiovascular injury. A selective therapy for COVID-19 has not yet been identified. Clinical trials with remdesivir gave discordant results. Thus, healthcare systems have focused on “multi-targeted” therapeutic strategies aiming at relieving systemic inflammation and thrombotic complications. No randomized clinical trial has demonstrated the efficacy of renin angiotensin system antagonists in reducing inflammation related to COVID-19. Dexamethasone and tocilizumab showed encouraging data, but their use needs to be further validated. The still-controversial efficacy of these treatments highlighted the importance of organ injury prevention in COVID-19. Neprilysin (NEP) might be an interesting target for this purpose. NEP expression is increased by cytokines on lung fibroblasts surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of SPINK1 Expression and TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion with Prognosis in Endocrine-Treated Prostate Cancer
    Published OnlineFirst May 4, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2505 Clinical Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis Cancer Research Association of SPINK1 Expression and TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion with Prognosis in Endocrine-Treated Prostate Cancer Katri A. Leinonen1, Teemu T. Tolonen1,3, Hazel Bracken1, Ulf-Håkan Stenman4, Teuvo L.J. Tammela2, Outi R. Saramäki1, and Tapio Visakorpi1 Abstract Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine whether TMPRSS2:ERG fusion or SPINK1 protein expres- sion is associated with hormone responsiveness of prostate cancer and can thus be used as a biomarker. Experimental Design: Diagnostic needle biopsies from prostate cancer patients primarily treated by endocrine therapy were evaluated for TMPRSS2:ERG fusion with fluorescence in situ hybridization and SPINK1 protein expression with immunohistochemistry. Results: The frequency of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion in 178 biopsies of hormonally treated patients was 34%. Of the fusion-positive cases, 71% showed deletion between the two genes, and 23% showed gain of the fusion. The fusion was associated with high Ki-67 staining (P = 0.001), age at diagnosis (P = 0.024), and tumor area (P = 0.006), but not with Gleason score, T stage, M stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or progression-free survival. Strong positive SPINK1 expression was found in 11% (21 of 186) of the biopsies. SPINK1-positive cases had significantly shorter progression-free survival compared with SPINK1-negative cases (P = 0.001). The expression was not associated with any other clinicopathologic variables studied. In a multivariate analysis, SPINK1 expression showed independent prognostic value, with a relative risk of 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.6).
    [Show full text]