DOCSLIB.ORG

Scientific Name No. of Forest Service Regions Where Species Or Its Habitat May Occur. Common Name Species Group Federal Candidat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scientific Name No. of Forest Service Regions Where Species Or Its Habitat May Occur. Common Name Species Group Federal Candidat Item 3a - Sensitive Species Unique Species Occurrence National List By Species Group. No. of Forest Not likely to have habitat Service Regions Federal Likely to have habitat within IRAs that DO NOT where species Candidate within IRAs that DO NOT Likely to have habitat within ALLOW road or its habitat Species Species Under ALLOW road IRAs that ALLOW road (re)construction but could Scientific Name may occur. Common Name Group ESA (re)construction? (re)construction? be affected? Ambystoma jeffersonianum 1 Jefferson Salamander Amphibian No No No No Ambystoma tigrinum 1 Tiger Salmander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Aneides aeneus 1 Green Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Sacramento Mountain Aneides hardii 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Batrachoseps campi 1 Inyo Mountain Salamander Amphibian No No No No San Gabriel Mtn Slender Batrachoseps gabrieli 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Relictual Slender Batrachoseps relictus 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Kern Canyon Slender Batrachoseps simatus 1 Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Breckenridge Mtn Slender Batrachoseps ssp. 1 1 Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Kern Plateau Slender Batrachoseps ssp. 2 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Tehachapi Slender Batrachoseps stebbinsi 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Bufo boreas boreas 3 Boreal Western Toad Amphibian Yes Yes Yes No Bufo canorus 1 Yosemite Toad Amphibian No Yes Yes No Bufo microscaphus microscaphus 1 Southwestern (Arizona) Toad Amphibian No Yes Yes No Cryptobranchus alleganiensis 1 Hellbender Amphibian No No No No Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi 1 Ozark Hellbender Amphibian No No Yes No Santeetlah Dusky Desmognathus santeetlah 1 Salamander Amphibian No No No No Dicamptodon copei 1 Cope's Giant Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus augusti cactorum 1 Western Barking Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus eneidae 1 Mottled Coqui Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus gryllus 1 A Coqui Amphibian No No No No Eleutherodactylus hedricki 1 A Coqui Amphibian No No No No Eleutherodactylus karlschmidti 1 Web-Footed Coqui Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus locustus 1 Warty Coqui Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus richmondi 1 Ground Coqui Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eleutherodactylus unicolor 1 Burrow Coqui Amphibian No Yes Yes No Ensatina eschscholtzii croceater 1 Yellow-Blotched Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Ensatina eschscholtzii klauberi 1 Large-Blotched Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Eurycea junaluska 1 Junaluska Salamander Amphibian No No No No Eurycea tynerensis 1 Oklahoma Salamander Amphibian No Yes No No Hemidactylium scutatum 1 Four-toed Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Hydromantes brunus 1 Limestone Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Hydromantes shastae 1 Shasta Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Sensitive Species USO Last revised: 8.4.00 Page 1 of 130 Hyla avivoca 1 Bird-voiced Tree Frog Amphibian No No No No Necturus ssp. 1 Black Warrior Waterdog Amphibian No No No No Notopthalmus perstriatus 1 Striped Newt Amphibian No Yes Yes No Plethodon aureolus 1 Tellico Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Plethodon caddoensis 1 Caddo Mountain Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Plethodon elongatus 1 Del Norte Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Fourche Mountain Plethodon fourchensis 1 Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Plethodon hubrichti 1 Peaks Of Otter Salamander Amphibian No No No No Plethodon kisatchie 1 Louisiana Slimy Salamander Amphibian No Yes No No Plethodon larselli 1 Larch Mountain Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Jemez Mountains Plethodon neomexicanus 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes No No Plethodon ouachitae 1 Rich Mountain Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Plethodon punctatus 1 Cow Knob Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Siskiyou Mountain Plethodon stormi 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Southern Appalachian Plethodon teyahalee 1 Salamander Amphibian No No Yes No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis 1 Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana aurora aurora 2 Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana blairi 1 Plains Leopard Frog Amphibian No No No No Rana boylii 1 Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana capito aesopus 1 Florida Gopher Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana capito capito 1 Carolina Gopher Frog Amphibian No No No No Rana capito sevosa 1 Dusky Gopher Frog Amphibian Yes No No No Rana cascadea 1 Cascade Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana luteiventris 2 Columbia Spotted Frog Amphibian Yes Yes Yes No Rana onca 1 Relict Leopard Frog Amphibian No No No No Rana pipiens 4 Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana pretiosa 3 Spotted Frog Amphibian Yes Yes Yes No Ramsey Canyon Leopard Rana subaquavocalis 1 Frog Amphibian No Yes No No Rana sylvatica 1 Wood Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Rana yavapaiensis 1 Lowland Leopard Frog Amphibian No Yes Yes No Southern Torrent Rhyacotriton variegatus 1 Salamander Amphibian No Yes Yes No Accipiter gentilis 6 Northern Goshawk Bird No Yes Yes No Accipiter gentilis apache 1 Apache Northern Goshawk Bird No Yes Yes No Accipiter gentilis laingi 1 Queen Charlotte Goshawk Bird No Yes Yes No Aegolius funereus 4 Boreal Owl Bird No Yes Yes No Agelaius tricolor 1 Tricolored Blackbird Bird No Yes Yes No Aimophila aestivalis 2 Bachman's Sparrow Bird No Yes Yes No Yuma Rufous-Crowned Aimophila ruficeps rupicola 1 Sparrow Bird No No No No Ammodramus bairdii 2 Baird's Sparrow Bird No Yes Yes No Ammodramus henslowii 1 Henslow's Sparrow Bird No No No No Sensitive Species USO Last revised: 8.4.00 Page 2 of 130 Ammodramus leconteii 1 Le Conte's Sparrow Bird No No Yes No Nelson's Sharp-tailed Ammodramus nelsoni 1 Sparrow Bird No No Yes No Anthus spragueii 1 Sprague's Pipit Bird No No Yes No Asio flammeus 1 Short-eared Owl Bird No No No No Asturina nitida maxima 1 Northern Gray Hawk Bird No Yes Yes No Athene cunicularia 1 Western Burrowing Owl Bird No Yes Yes No Bartramia longicauda 3 Upland Sandpiper Bird No Yes Yes No Botaurus lentiginosus 1 American Bittern Bird No Yes Yes No Branta canadensis occidentalis 1 Dusky Canada Goose Bird No Yes Yes No Buteo lineatus 1 Red-shouldered Hawk Bird No No No No Buteo regalis 2 Ferruginous Hawk Bird No Yes Yes No Buteo swainsoni 1 Swainson's Hawk Bird No Yes Yes No Buteogallus anthracinus 1 Common Black-Hawk Bird No Yes Yes No Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis 1 San Diego Cactus Wren Bird No Yes Yes No Catharus bicknelli 1 Bicknell's Thrush Bird No Yes Yes No Centrocercus obtusilobula 1 Western Sage Grouse Bird No Yes Yes No Centrocercus urophasianus 1 Sage Grouse Bird No Yes Yes No Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus 2 Western Snowy Plover Bird No No Yes No Chlidonias niger 2 Black Tern Bird No Yes Yes No Circus cyaneus 1 Northern Harrier Bird No No No No Western Yellow-Billed Coccyzus americanus occidentalis 2 Cuckoo Bird No Yes Yes No Contopus borealis 1 Olive-Sided Flycatcher Bird No Yes Yes No Contopus cooperi 1 Olive-sided Flycatcher Bird No No Yes No Coturnicops noveboracensis 2 Yellow Rail Bird No Yes Yes No Cygnus buccinator 5 Trumpeter Swan Bird No Yes Yes No Cypseloides niger 1 Black Swift Bird No Yes Yes No Dendroica angelae 1 Elfin Woods Warbler Bird Yes Yes Yes No Dendroica caerulescens 1 Black-throated Blue Warbler Bird No No Yes No Dendroica castanea 1 Bay-breasted Warbler Bird No No Yes No Dendroica cerulea 1 Cerulean Warbler Bird No Yes Yes No Dendroica discolor 1 Prairie Warbler Bird No No No No Dolichonyx oryzivorus 1 Bobolink Bird No No No No Empidonax flaviventris 1 Yellow-bellied Flycatcher Bird No No No No Euptilotis neoxenus 1 Eared Trogan Bird No Yes No No Falcipennis canadensis 1 Spruce Grouse Bird No No Yes No Falco columbarius 1 Merlin Bird No Yes Yes No Falco peregrinus anatum 7 American Peregrine Falcon Bird No Yes Yes No Falco peregrinus pealei 1 Peale's Peregrine Falcon Bird No Yes Yes No Gavia immer 5 Common Loon Bird No Yes Yes No Grus canadensis pratensis 1 Florida Sandhill Crane Bird No Yes Yes No Grus canadensis tabida 3 Greater Sandhill Crane Bird No Yes Yes No Histrionicus histrionicus 4 Harlequin Duck Bird No Yes Yes No Ixobrychus exilis 1 Least Bittern Bird No No No No Lagopus leucurus 1 White-Tailed Ptarmigan Bird No Yes Yes No Lanius ludovicianus 2 Loggerhead Shrike Bird No Yes Yes No Lanius ludovicianus migrans 2 Migrant Loggerhead Shrike Bird No Yes Yes No Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus 1 California Black Rail Bird No No No No Leucosticte arctoa atrata 1 Black-Rosy Finch Bird No Yes Yes No Limnothlypis swainsonii 1 Swainson's Warbler Bird No No Yes No Sensitive Species USO Last revised: 8.4.00 Page 3 of 130 Melanerpes lewis 1 Lewis' Woodpecker Bird No Yes Yes No Meleagris gallopavo mexicana 1 Gould's Wild Turkey Bird No Yes Yes No Numenius americanus 2 Long-Billed Curlew Bird No Yes Yes No Nycticorax nycticorax 1 Black-crowned Night-heron Bird No No No No Oporornis agilis 1 Connecticut Warbler Bird No No Yes No Oreortyx pictus 2 Mountain Quail Bird No Yes Yes No Otus flammeolus 3 Flammulated Owl Bird No Yes Yes No Pandion haliaetus 2 Osprey Bird No Yes Yes No Passerculus sandwichensis Chihuahua Savannah rufofuscus 1 Sparrow Bird No No No No Passerella iliaca 1 Fox Sparrow Bird No Yes Yes No Pelecanus erythrorhynchos 1 American White Pelican Bird No Yes No No Phalaropus tricolor 1 Wilson's Phalarope Bird No No Yes No Picoides albolarvatus 2 White-Headed Woodpecker Bird No Yes Yes No Picoides arcticus 3 Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird No Yes Yes No Picoides tridactylus 3 Three-toed Woodpecker Bird No Yes Yes No Plegadis chihi 1 White-Faced Ibis Bird No Yes Yes No Progne subis 1 Purple Martin Bird No Yes Yes No
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona Game and Fish Department Heritage Data Management System
    ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Plant Abstract Element Code: PMAGA010N2 Data Sensitivity: YES CLASSIFICATION, NOMENCLATURE, DESCRIPTION, RANGE NAME: Agave schottii var. treleasei (Toumey) Kearney & Peebles COMMON NAME: Trelease Agave, Schott Agave, Trelease Shindagger, Trelease’s century plant SYNONYMS: Agave treleasei Toumey FAMILY: Agavaceae AUTHOR, PLACE OF PUBLICATION: Agave schottii var. treleasei (Toumey) T.H. Kearney, and R.H. Peebles, Jour. Wash. Acad. Sciences 29(11): 474. 1939. Agave treleasei Toumey, Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 12: 75-76, pl. 32-33. 1901. TYPE LOCALITY: USA: Arizona: Pima County: Castle Rock, SW slope of Santa Catalina Mt. TYPE SPECIMEN: HT: Toumey s.n. (“in herb. Toumey”); possibly IT at: ARIZ, MO, US. “Present location of specimen unknown” (Phillips and Hodgson 1991). What appears to be an isotype found at MO (Hodgson, 1995). TAXONOMIC UNIQUENESS: The variety treleasei is 1 of 2 in the species Agave schottii; the other is var. schottii. In North America, the species schottii is 1 of 34 in the genus Agave. There are more than 200 species recognized from the southern USA to northern South America, and throughout the Caribbean. The variety treleasei is very rare and poorly known. In the Santa Catalina Mountains, it is possibly a polyploid form of schottii, or another case of hybridization between A. chrysantha or A. palmeri and A. schottii var. schottii (Hodgson 1987 Pers. Comm.). Formerly, a population in the Ajo Mountains was thought to be a disjunct population of var. treleasi, but through genetic testing, it was determined to be of hybrid origin between Agave s.
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinquapin the Newsletter of the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society
    chinquapin The Newsletter of the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society Volume 16, No. 4 Winter 2008 Happy Holidays from SABS Red spruce “hunkering down” for winter in the Great Smoky Mountains Photo by Scott Ranger 2 Chinquapin 16 (4) The Newsletter of the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society SABS Officers & Editors Conley K. McMullen, President Department of Biology, MSC 7801 Field Notes by Scott Ranger James Madison University Harrisonburg, VA 22807 3) Do weather conditions control flowering? (540) 568-3805 · fax (540) 568-3333 Three-birds Orchid Update I made a careful comparison of weather [email protected] conditions in 2007 (very hot with 14 days Howard S. Neufeld, Past President With another season of observing this > 90°F and 5 >100°F and dry with ~20% of Department of Biology ephemeral orchid at Pickett’s Mill Battlefield normal rainfall) and 2008 (nearly normal). 572 Rivers Street State Historic Site, I’ve come up with some The same flowering pattern occurred both Appalachian State University observations and questions. The photograph years. It seems weather, at least in these two Boone, NC 28608 below is illustrative for both. If anyone has years, didn’t have an effect on flowering. We (828) 262-2683 · fax (828) 262-2127 any answers, I’d love to hear them. counted a total of 460 stems in 2008, up [email protected] 61.5% from 2007. Weather probably had Charles N. Horn, Treasurer Observations: something to do with this. Biology Department • Even the smallest stems (>2 mm diameter 2100 College Street and >3 cm tall) have at least one well- 4) Is synchronicity overemphasized? I think Newberry College developed flower bud.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Treatments Record of Decision
    Attachment B – Conservation Measures for Special Status Species Introduction These Conservation Measures were displayed in Appendix 5 of the Final EIS. They are the product of the PEIS Biological Assessment and adopted by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service Consultation, and apply to listed and proposed species as described in those consultation documents. These do not apply where a No Effect determination can be made without them, or where site-specific consultation identifies alternative ways to achieve appropriate protection. PEIS Mitigation Measures adopted by this Record of Decision also require implementation of certain of these conservation measures “When necessary to protect Special Status plant/fish and other aquatic organisms/wildlife species….” (see Attachment A). Conservation Measures for Birds Conservation Measures for the California Brown Pelican Although treatment activities are unlikely to negatively affect the brown pelican or its habitat, extra steps could be taken by the BLM to ensure that herbicide treatments conducted in brown pelican wintering habitat did not result in negative effects to the species: • If feasible, conduct vegetation treatments in brown pelican wintering habitat outside the period when pelicans are likely to be present. • If herbicide treatments in brown pelican habitats must be conducted during the wintering period: ◦ Do not use 2,4-D in pelican wintering habitat. ◦ Prior to conducting herbicide treatments on pelican wintering habitat, survey the area for pelicans. Wait for pelicans to leave the area before spraying. ◦ Do not broadcast spray clopyralid, glyphosate, hexazinone, picloram, or triclopyr in pelican wintering habitats. ◦ If broadcast spraying imazapyr or metsulfuron methyl in pelican wintering habitats, use the typical rather than the maximum application rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Botanical Resource Assessment
    USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest District Yuba River Ranger District OTHER BOTANICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Yuba Project 08/01/2017 Prepared by: Date: Courtney Rowe, District Botanist TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TNF Watch List Botanical Species ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Summary of Analysis Procedure .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Project Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 Special Status Plant Communities ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Project Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 Special Management Designations ..................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Project Compliance ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Resources Management Plan
    EXHIBIT A El Dorado County Oak Resources Managenient Plan September 2017 El Dorado County Community Development Agency Long Range Planning Division 2850 Fairlane Court, Placerville, CA 95667 OAK RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... l 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................1 1.2 Goals and Objectives of Plan .................................................................................2 1.3 Oak Resources in El Dorado County .....................................................................3 1.3.1 Oak Woodlands ........................................................................................... .3 1.3 .2 Oak Trees .................................................................................................... .4 1.4 Economic Activity, Land, and Ecosystem Values of Oak Resources ....................4 1.5 State-level Regulations ...........................................................................................4 2.0 Oak Resources Impact Mitigation Requirements .........................................................6 2.1 Applicability, Exemptions and Mitigation Reductions ..........................................6 2.1.1 Single-Family Lot Exemption...................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Fire Safe Activities Exemption ....................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Sensitive Plant Species by Forest
    USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region 1 Sensitive Plant Species by Forest 2013 FS R5 RF Plant Species List Klamath NF Mendocino NF Shasta-Trinity NF NF Rivers Six Lassen NF Modoc NF Plumas NF EldoradoNF Inyo NF LTBMU Tahoe NF Sequoia NF Sierra NF Stanislaus NF Angeles NF Cleveland NF Los Padres NF San Bernardino NF Scientific Name (Common Name) Abies bracteata (Santa Lucia fir) X Abronia alpina (alpine sand verbena) X Abronia nana ssp. covillei (Coville's dwarf abronia) X X Abronia villosa var. aurita (chaparral sand verbena) X X Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (Abrams' flowery puncturebract) X X Acanthoscyphus parishii var. cienegensis (Cienega Seca flowery puncturebract) X Agrostis hooveri (Hoover's bentgrass) X Allium hickmanii (Hickman's onion) X Allium howellii var. clokeyi (Mt. Pinos onion) X Allium jepsonii (Jepson's onion) X X Allium marvinii (Yucaipa onion) X Allium tribracteatum (three-bracted onion) X X Allium yosemitense (Yosemite onion) X X Anisocarpus scabridus (scabrid alpine tarplant) X X X Antennaria marginata (white-margined everlasting) X Antirrhinum subcordatum (dimorphic snapdragon) X Arabis rigidissima var. demota (Carson Range rock cress) X X Arctostaphylos cruzensis (Arroyo de la Cruz manzanita) X Arctostaphylos edmundsii (Little Sur manzanita) X Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. gabrielensis (San Gabriel manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos hooveri (Hoover's manzanita) X Arctostaphylos luciana (Santa Lucia manzanita) X Arctostaphylos nissenana (Nissenan manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos obispoensis (Bishop manzanita) X Arctostphylos parryana subsp. tumescens (interior manzanita) X X Arctostaphylos pilosula (Santa Margarita manzanita) X Arctostaphylos rainbowensis (rainbow manzanita) X Arctostaphylos refugioensis (Refugio manzanita) X Arenaria lanuginosa ssp. saxosa (rock sandwort) X Astragalus anxius (Ash Valley milk-vetch) X Astragalus bernardinus (San Bernardino milk-vetch) X Astragalus bicristatus (crested milk-vetch) X X Pacific Southwest Region, Regional Forester's Sensitive Species List.
    [Show full text]