Men's Basketball Tickets Sell out Ticketing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
No Jury Rigging in the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit: an Analysis of Jury Testimony to Impeach Jury Verdicts
SEVENTH CIRCUIT REVIEW Volume 4, Issue 2 Spring 2009 NO JURY RIGGING IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT: AN ANALYSIS OF JURY TESTIMONY TO IMPEACH JURY VERDICTS ∗ BRIAN W. REIDY Cite as: Brian W. Reidy, No Jury Rigging in the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit: An Analysis of Jury Testimony to Impeach Jury Verdicts, 4 SEVENTH CIRCUIT REV. 428 (2009), at http://www.kentlaw.edu/7cr/v4-2/reidy.pdf. I. INTRODUCTION Following the conclusion of a federal jury trial, a unique tension exists between the notion of a “fair verdict” and the American legal system’s historical veneration of private jury deliberations. When a litigant alleges that a fair trial was denied after jury deliberations have concluded, the resolution of this allegation directly conflicts with the systemic interest in verdict finality. Few would deny that a losing litigant deserves a new trial if the jury’s verdict was tainted by something external to the protections of the courtroom.1 Conversely, it is well-recognized that, unlike fine wine, steaks, and cheese, lawsuits do not improve with age because as time passes, memories fade, ∗ J.D. candidate, May 2009, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology. Special thank you to both my wife, Lizzie—I am nothing without you—and to my son, Owen—you inspire me every day. I love you both more than you will ever know! 1 James W. Diehm, Impeachment of Jury Verdicts: Tanner v. United States and Beyond, 65 ST. JOHN’S L. REV. 389, 403 (1991) (noting that external influences would include: threats against jurors, outside or erroneous information provided to jurors, or other improper influences). -
Jury Misconduct in Texas: Trying the Trier of Fact
SMU Law Review Volume 34 Issue 5 Article 3 1980 Jury Misconduct in Texas: Trying the Trier of Fact David E. Keltner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation David E. Keltner, Jury Misconduct in Texas: Trying the Trier of Fact, 34 SW L.J. 1131 (1980) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol34/iss5/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. JURY MISCONDUCT IN TEXAS: TRYING THE TRIER OF FACT by David E.Kellner* T HE problem of jury misconduct has plagued attorneys since the adoption of the Magna Carta. Since that time practitioners, concerned that verdicts be reached fairly, have attacked the outcomes of jury trials on the grounds that the jurors violated their oaths and instructions. In ad- dressing jury misconduct, courts have been caught between two conflicting policies. First, courts recognize that every litigant is entitled to a fair trial, free from preconceived prejudices and outside influence. A juror's mis- conduct can and often does deny this right. On the other hand, the jury's verdict should be certain and final. A subsequent review of the jury's de- liberations results in a trial on a trial. In their struggle to choose between these two policies, Texas courts have created a body of law with peculiar rules, practices, and presumptions governing jury misconduct cases that affect every attorney engaged in litigation. -
Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the First Circuit)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE 2019 REVISIONS TO PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT DISTRICT OF MAINE INTERNET SITE EDITION Updated 6/24/19 by Chief District Judge Nancy Torresen PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Preface to 1998 Edition Citations to Other Pattern Instructions How to Use the Pattern Instructions Part 1—Preliminary Instructions 1.01 Duties of the Jury 1.02 Nature of Indictment; Presumption of Innocence 1.03 Previous Trial 1.04 Preliminary Statement of Elements of Crime 1.05 Evidence; Objections; Rulings; Bench Conferences 1.06 Credibility of Witnesses 1.07 Conduct of the Jury 1.08 Notetaking 1.09 Outline of the Trial Part 2—Instructions Concerning Certain Matters of Evidence 2.01 Stipulations 2.02 Judicial Notice 2.03 Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement 2.04 Impeachment of Witness Testimony by Prior Conviction 2.05 Impeachment of Defendant's Testimony by Prior Conviction 2.06 Evidence of Defendant's Prior Similar Acts 2.07 Weighing the Testimony of an Expert Witness 2.08 Caution as to Cooperating Witness/Accomplice/Paid Informant 2.09 Use of Tapes and Transcripts 2.10 Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt 2.11 Statements by Defendant 2.12 Missing Witness 2.13 Spoliation 2.14 Witness (Not the Defendant) Who Takes the Fifth Amendment 2.15 Definition of “Knowingly” 2.16 “Willful Blindness” As a Way of Satisfying “Knowingly” 2.17 Definition of “Willfully” 2.18 Taking a View 2.19 Character Evidence 2.20 Testimony by Defendant -
Filed an Amicus Brief
RECEIVED by MSC 1/24/2020 11:58:45 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS __________________________ PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE MICHIGAN, FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION Plaintiff/Appellee, MSC NO.: 159063 COA NO.: 342424 -vs- CIRCUIT CT. NO.: 17-24073-AR DISTRICT CT. NO.: 15-45978-FY KEITH ERIC WOOD, Defendant/Appellant. _____________________________ AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION Submitted by: /s/ Eric Misterovich Eric Misterovich (P73422) Revision Legal, PLLC 8051 Moorsbridge Rd. Portage, MI 49024 (269) 281-3908 [email protected] John Di Giacomo (P73056) Revision Legal, PLLC 444 Cass St., Ste. D Traverse City, Michigan 49684 (231) 714-0100 [email protected] Attorneys for the Fully Informed Jury Association RECEIVED by MSC 1/24/2020 11:58:45 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY OF THIS CASE AND THE ARGUMENTS IN THIS BRIEF ................................ 2 ARGUMENT.............................................................................................................................. 3 I. EVEN IF WOOD HAD KNOWINGLY HANDED HIS PAMPHLETS OR ORALLY COMMUNICATED THE IDEAS CONTAINED IN THE PAMPHLETS DIRECTLY TO A KNOWN JUROR, HE WOULD NOT COMMIT THE CRIME OF JURY TAMPERING....... 4 II. MICHIGAN JURIES HAVE ALWAYS HAD THE -
In the Supreme Court of Mississippi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01886-SCT HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA AND HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY v. OLA MAE APPLEWHITE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF DOROTHY MAE APPLEWHITE, DECEASED, CEOLA WADE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ANTHONY J. STEWART, DECEASED, AND KENNETH CORDELL CARTER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF CECILIA COOPER, DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/13/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALBERT B. SMITH, III TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: J. COLLINS WOHNER, JR. PHILIP A. DOMINIQUE SARA BAILEY RUSSO ELIZABETH A. WEEKS KEITH W. McDANIEL ROBERT WILLIAM MAXWELL LINDSEY C. MEADOR RALPH EDWIN CHAPMAN JIMMY B. WILKINS C. KENT HANEY DENNIS C. SWEET, III KEVIN CHRISTOPHER NEWSOM THOMAS N. VANDERFORD, JR. WILLIAM O. LUCKETT, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: J. COLLINS WOHNER, JR. MICHAEL JAMES BENTLEY JIMMY B. WILKINS WALTER EDGAR McGOWAN WILLIAM O. LUCKETT, JR. ROBERT WILLIAM MAXWELL ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: RALPH EDWIN CHAPMAN EDUARDO ALBERTO FLECHAS DANA J. SWAN DENNIS C. SWEET, III SARA BAILEY RUSSO NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - WRONGFUL DEATH DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED - 03/11/2021 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: EN BANC. RANDOLPH, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. This case arises from a two-car accident in which a Hyundai Excel was traveling southbound on U.S. Highway 61 at a closing speed of 68 to 78 mph and, for reasons unknown, crossed the center line into the oncoming lane of traffic. -
The 34Th Annual Indiana High School Athletic Association Girls Basketball State Finals
Welcome! The 34th Annual Indiana High School Athletic Association Girls Basketball State Finals Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, Indiana March 7, 2009 Session I, 10:30 a.m. EST Class A | Fort Wayne Canterbury (22-4) vs. Vincennes Rivet (23-1) Class 2A | Oak Hill (27-1) vs. Heritage Christian (25-1) Session II, 6:00 p.m. EST Class 3A | Fort Wayne Elmhurst (24-2) vs. Owen Valley (24-2) Class 4A | South Bend Washington (26-0) vs. Ben Davis (29-0) IHSAA Event Security Policy To help insure the safest and most secure atmosphere for this IHSAA State Final, event manage- ment will diligently maintain established security procedures and activities. This will require complete cooperation by all competing teams, contest officials and fans. Security will always have priority over convenience; therefore, if you are requested to cooperate with event personnel in any manner, please do so promptly. Your assistance will enable our staff to fulfill its responsibilities efficiently. IHSAA - Pure Spirit. Pure Sport! 1 Welcome to this championship event For more than 100 years, the IHSAA has enjoyed being a part of the journey to adulthood for thousands Special Thanks To Our Hosts of young Hoosiers. Knowing that the student-athletes we meet today will be the leaders of tomorrow, we are Lucas Oil Stadium grateful for the opportunity to help them as they learn 500 South Capital Avenue • Indpls., IN 46255 valuable life lessons through athletics. Executive Director Barney Levengood Currently in Indiana, over 160,000 students from 410 Stadium Director Mike Fox Event Coordinator Jennifer Ross different IHSAA member schools participate in high Ticket Office Manager Mary Dyar school athletics. -
Summer 2021 Criminal Law Webinar Case
Phil Dixon [email protected] Jonathan Holbrook [email protected] Brittany Williams [email protected] Summer Criminal Law Webinar June 4, 2021 Cases covered include reported decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court and the North Carolina appellate courts decided between December 15, 2020, and May 18, 2021. The summaries were prepared by School of Government faculty and staff. To view all of the summaries, go to the Criminal Case Compendium or the North Carolina Criminal Law Blog. To obtain the summaries automatically by email, sign up for the Criminal Law Listserv. Investigatory Stops and Seizures The application of physical force with intent to restrain a suspect, even if unsuccessful, is a Fourth Amendment seizure Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___, 141 S. Ct. 989 (Mar. 25, 2021) (Roberts, C.J.). Law enforcement officers were attempting to serve an arrest warrant early in the morning at an apartment complex in New Mexico. They noticed the plaintiff in the parking lot and realized she was not the subject of the warrant but wished to speak with her. As they approached, the plaintiff entered her car. According to the plaintiff, she did not immediately notice the police approaching (and was admittedly under the influence of methamphetamine). When an officer tried to open her car door to speak with her, she noticed armed men surrounding her car for the first time and drove off, fearing a carjacking. Although not in the path of the vehicle, the officers fired 13 rounds at the car as it drove away. The plaintiff was struck twice in her back but escaped, only to be apprehended the next day. -
Women's Basketball Award Winners
WOMEN’S BASKETBALL AWARD WINNERS All-America Teams 2 National Award Winners 15 Coaching Awards 20 Other Honors 22 First Team All-Americans By School 25 First Team Academic All-Americans By School 34 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners By School 39 ALL-AMERICA TEAMS 1980 Denise Curry, UCLA; Tina Division II Carla Eades, Central Mo.; Gunn, BYU; Pam Kelly, Francine Perry, Quinnipiac; WBCA COACHES’ Louisiana Tech; Nancy Stacey Cunningham, First selected in 1975. Voted on by the Wom en’s Lieberman, Old Dominion; Shippensburg; Claudia Basket ball Coaches Association. Was sponsored Inge Nissen, Old Dominion; Schleyer, Abilene Christian; by Kodak through 2006-07 season and State Jill Rankin, Tennessee; Lorena Legarde, Portland; Farm through 2010-11. Susan Taylor, Valdosta St.; Janice Washington, Valdosta Rosie Walker, SFA; Holly St.; Donna Burks, Dayton; 1975 Carolyn Bush, Wayland Warlick, Tennessee; Lynette Beth Couture, Erskine; Baptist; Marianne Crawford, Woodard, Kansas. Candy Crosby, Northern Ill.; Immaculata; Nancy Dunkle, 1981 Denise Curry, UCLA; Anne Kelli Litsch, Southwestern Cal St. Fullerton; Lusia Donovan, Old Dominion; Okla. Harris, Delta St.; Jan Pam Kelly, Louisiana Tech; Division III Evelyn Oquendo, Salem St.; Irby, William Penn; Ann Kris Kirchner, Rutgers; Kaye Cross, Colby; Sallie Meyers, UCLA; Brenda Carol Menken, Oregon St.; Maxwell, Kean; Page Lutz, Moeller, Wayland Baptist; Cindy Noble, Tennessee; Elizabethtown; Deanna Debbie Oing, Indiana; Sue LaTaunya Pollard, Long Kyle, Wilkes; Laurie Sankey, Rojcewicz, Southern Conn. Beach St.; Bev Smith, Simpson; Eva Marie St.; Susan Yow, Elon. Oregon; Valerie Walker, Pittman, St. Andrews; Lois 1976 Carol Blazejowski, Montclair Cheyney; Lynette Woodard, Salto, New Rochelle; Sally St.; Cindy Brogdon, Mercer; Kansas. -
Arkansas Sentencing Commission Pursuant to A
Arkansas Sentencing Impact Assessment for HB1454 Commission Sponsored by Representative A. Collins and Senator Bond Subtitle CONCERNING WITNESS, INFORMANT, AND JURY TAMPERING OR INTIMIDATION; AND CONCERNING EVIDENCE TAMPERING. Impact Summary1 Cannot be determined. Change from current law2 Amends Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-53-109, Intimidating a witness, to require that the offense be committed knowingly and to increase the penalty in some circumstances. Currently, the statute is silent as to the intent required for committing the offense and the penalty for intimidating a witness is a Class C felony. Under the proposed bill, the penalty for intimidating a witness is one (1) felony classification lower than the underlying offense for which the witness or person believed to be called as a witness is to be a witness if the offense is a Class B felony or higher felony offense of Homicide (A.C.A. § 5-10-101 et seq.), an attempted homicide, or Rape (A.C.A. § 5-14-103). If otherwise committed, intimidating a witness remains a Class C felony under the proposed bill. Amends A.C.A. § 5-53-110, Tampering, to require that the offense be committed knowingly and to increase the penalty in some circumstances. Currently, the statute is silent as to the intent required for committing the offense and the penalty for tampering is a Class A misdemeanor. Under the proposed bill, tampering is a Class C felony if the person impairs or obstructs the investigation of a felony offense. If otherwise committed, tampering remains a Class A misdemeanor under the proposed bill. Amends A.C.A. -
2011 Tulsa Shock Media Guide
2011 TULSA SHOCK MEDIA GUIDE 2011 TULSA SHOCK MEDIA GUIDE MEDIA | CHEAT SHEET 2011 TULSA SHOCK 24 8 4 33 MIRANDA AYIM ELIZABETH CAMBAGE AMBER HOLT TIFFANY JACKSON Center • Rookie Center • Rookie Forward • 3 Years Pro Forward • 4 Years Pro 6’3 6’8” • 225 6’0 • 170 6’3 • 185 Pepperdine Australia Middle Tennessee St. ‘08 University of Texas 20 21 12 7 MARION JONES JENNIFER LACY IVORY LATTA BETTY LENNOX Guard • 1 Year Pro Forward • 5 Years Pro Guard • 4 Years Pro Guard • 11 Years Pro 5’10 • 150 6’3 • 175 5’6 • 143 5’8 • 143 North Carolina Pepperdine North Carolina Lousiana Tech 2 3 14 0 RASHANDA McCANTS DARXIA MORRIS KAYLA PEDERSON CHASTITY REED Forward • 2 Years Pro Guard • Rookie Forward • Rookie Forward • Rookie 6’1 • 163 5’8 6’4 6’1 North Carolina UCLA Stanford Arkansas-Little Rock 22 SHERYL SWOOPES Guard • 11 Years Pro 6’0 • 145 Texas Tech GET PLUGGED IN TULSATULSA SHOCKSHOCK CREDITSTS Editorss . .PardeepParPa deee p TToorooooro Design,n LayoutLayoy utt andannd Production.Production . RegRReganan RobinettRobinettt Photography . Shane Bevel © 2011 Tulsa Shock All WNBA and team insignia depicted in this publication are the property of WNBA Properties, Inc. and the respective teams of the WNBA and may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without the prior written consent of WNBA Properties, Inc. The information contained in this publication was compiled by the Tulsa Shock and is provided as a courtesy to our fans and the press and may be used only for personal or editorial purposes. Any commercial use of this information is prohibited without the prior written consent of the Tulsa Shock. -
Skal Det Være Morsomt? En Amerikanske Filmkomik Har Af Flemming Kaspersen Ikke at Dette Er Noget Negativt: Ro Ddet Ikke Så Sjovt
F A R C E Skal det være morsomt? en amerikanske filmkomik har af Flemming Kaspersen Ikke at dette er noget negativt: Ro Ddet ikke så sjovt. Der bliver sta bin Williams er f.eks. en glimrende dig lavet succesfulde komedier, ja seriøs skuespiller, og Steve Martins vist, og også ret mange - blandt det komiske perler, som f.eks. Steve mere sentimentale film er blandt seneste års økonomiske topscorere Martins Manden med de to hjerner hans bedste. Men når det drejer sig er Alene hjemme og G host - men for (alene titlen opsummerer meget om den gispende krampelatter er en puritaner, der foretrækker sin godt tendensen). den nye pænhed simpelthen ikke le komik ren og usukret, er vandene i I dag er billedet skiftet. Den ame veringsdygtig. Derfor er det godt at de seneste par år blevet en kende rikanske mainstream-komedie er have ZAZ, og derfor er en film som grumsede. blevet sødere, i hvert fald den del Høj pistolføring 2'/2 en nødvendighed, Omkring 1979-80 skete der et der klarer sig bedst ved biograflu blottet som den er for føleri og mo uventet boom, efter års stagnation: gerne. Væk - eller rettere: henvist til ral. succesfulde tv- og stand up-komi- videohylderne - er det støjende, det kere som Steve Martin, Bill Murray, upolerede, det anarkistiske og un- ZAZ/ John Belushi og Dan Aykroyd blev derlivsfikserede, og i stedet er trådt ZAZ er forfatter/producent/instruk- pludselig filmstjerner, John Landis' en ny, og vel nok tidssvarende, me tør-trioen David Zucker, Jim Abra- Delta kliken viste at man i teenage- get familieorienteret pænhed og sen hams og Jerry Zucker (som instrue publikummet havde en økonomisk timentalitet. -
B a S K E T B A
NOTRE DAMERECORDS Jacqueline Batteast ranks among the top five on 16 of Notre Dame career statistical charts, including points (fourth), rebounds (fourth) and blocked shots (third). Single-Game Records Most Assists – 38 vs. Marquette on Dec. 21, 1990 I Most Points, Half – 61 (1st) vs. Cleveland State on Nov. 26, 2002 Fewest Turnovers – (Notre Dame 107, Cleveland State 65) 67 at DePaul on Feb. 12, 2006 Most Points, Game – Most Turnovers – 113 vs. Liberty on Nov. 24, 1989 50 vs. Michigan on Dec. 8, 1979 (Notre Dame 113, Liberty 35) Most Blocked Shots – R 18 at Bradley on Feb. 18, 1983 Most Points, Home Game – 111 vs. West Virginia on Jan. 7, 1999 Most Steals – (Notre Dame 111, West Virginia 90) 29, twice (last: at Saint Louis on Jan. 31, 1991) Most Points, Road Game – 97, three times (last: at Providence on Jan. I 30, 1999) (Notre Dame 97, Providence 59) POINTS Most Points, Losing Effort – 93 vs. Northwestern State on March 24, 1995 Most Points (Northwestern State 103, Notre Dame 93, ot) 1. 41, Ruth Riley at Providence, 1/30/99 2. 40, Katryna Gaither vs. Ohio, 11/29/96 Most Points, Both Teams – 3. 36, Ruth Riley vs. Miami, 2/22/00 201 vs. West Virginia on Jan. 7, 1999 S 36, Ruth Riley vs. Providence, 1/10/99 (Notre Dame 111, West Virginia 90) 36, Beth Morgan vs. Alabama, 3/22/97 Karen Robinson had the greatest single-game shooting performance in school history, making all 12 of her Fewest Points, Half – 12 (1st) vs. Virginia on Feb.