Upland Game Identification Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sage-Grouse Hunting Season
CHAPTER 11 UPLAND GAME BIRD AND SMALL GAME HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302 and § 23-2-105 (d). Section 2. Hunting Regulations. (a) Bag and Possession Limit. Only one (1) daily bag limit of each species of upland game birds and small game may be taken per day regardless of the number of hunt areas hunted in a single day. When hunting more than one (1) hunt area, a person’s daily and possession limits shall be equal to, but shall not exceed, the largest daily and possession limit prescribed for any one (1) of the specified hunt areas in which the hunting and possession occurs. (b) Evidence of sex and species shall remain naturally attached to the carcass of any upland game bird in the field and during transportation. For pheasant, this shall include the feathered head, feathered wing or foot. For all other upland game bird species, this shall include one fully feathered wing. (c) No person shall possess or use shot other than nontoxic shot for hunting game birds and small game with a shotgun on the Commission’s Table Mountain and Springer wildlife habitat management areas and on all national wildlife refuges open for hunting. (d) Required Clothing. Any person hunting pheasants within the boundaries of any Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Wildlife Habitat Management Area, or on Bureau of Reclamation Withdrawal lands bordering and including Glendo State Park, shall wear in a visible manner at least one (1) outer garment of fluorescent orange or fluorescent pink color which shall include a hat, shirt, jacket, coat, vest or sweater. -
A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 11, No. 1, February, pp. 38–54, 1999 Article ID mpev.1998.0562, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R. T. Kimball,* E. L. Braun,*,† P. W. Zwartjes,* T. M. Crowe,‡,§ and J. D. Ligon* *Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; †National Center for Genome Resources, 1800 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505; ‡Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Capetown, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa; and §Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192 Received October 8, 1997; revised June 2, 1998 World partridges are smaller and widely distributed in Cytochrome b and D-loop nucleotide sequences were Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most partridge species are used to study patterns of molecular evolution and monochromatic and primarily dull colored. None exhib- phylogenetic relationships between the pheasants and its the extreme or highly specialized ornamentation the partridges, which are thought to form two closely characteristic of the pheasants. related monophyletic galliform lineages. Our analyses Although the order Galliformes is well defined, taxo- used 34 complete cytochrome b and 22 partial D-loop nomic relationships are less clear within the group sequences from the hypervariable domain I of the (Verheyen, 1956), due to the low variability in anatomi- D-loop, representing 20 pheasant species (15 genera) and 12 partridge species (5 genera). We performed cal and osteological traits (Blanchard, 1857, cited in parsimony, maximum likelihood, and distance analy- Verheyen, 1956; Lowe, 1938; Delacour, 1977). -
Wild Turkey Education Guide
Table of Contents Section 1: Eastern Wild Turkey Ecology 1. Eastern Wild Turkey Quick Facts………………………………………………...pg 2 2. Eastern Wild Turkey Fact Sheet………………………………………………….pg 4 3. Wild Turkey Lifecycle……………………………………………………………..pg 8 4. Eastern Wild Turkey Adaptations ………………………………………………pg 9 Section 2: Eastern Wild Turkey Management 1. Wild Turkey Management Timeline…………………….……………………….pg 18 2. History of Wild Turkey Management …………………...…..…………………..pg 19 3. Modern Wild Turkey Management in Maryland………...……………………..pg 22 4. Managing Wild Turkeys Today ……………………………………………….....pg 25 Section 3: Activity Lesson Plans 1. Activity: Growing Up WILD: Tasty Turkeys (Grades K-2)……………..….…..pg 33 2. Activity: Calling All Turkeys (Grades K-5)………………………………..…….pg 37 3. Activity: Fit for a Turkey (Grades 3-5)…………………………………………...pg 40 4. Activity: Project WILD adaptation: Too Many Turkeys (Grades K-5)…..…….pg 43 5. Activity: Project WILD: Quick, Frozen Critters (Grades 5-8).……………….…pg 47 6. Activity: Project WILD: Turkey Trouble (Grades 9-12………………….……....pg 51 7. Activity: Project WILD: Let’s Talk Turkey (Grades 9-12)..……………..………pg 58 Section 4: Additional Activities: 1. Wild Turkey Ecology Word Find………………………………………….…….pg 66 2. Wild Turkey Management Word Find………………………………………….pg 68 3. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 70 4. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 71 5. Turkey Color-by-Letter……………………………………..…………………….pg 72 6. Five Little Turkeys Song Sheet……. ………………………………………….…pg 73 7. Thankful Turkey…………………..…………………………………………….....pg 74 8. Graph-a-Turkey………………………………….…………………………….…..pg 75 9. Turkey Trouble Maze…………………………………………………………..….pg 76 10. What Animals Made These Tracks………………………………………….……pg 78 11. Drinking Straw Turkey Call Craft……………………………………….….……pg 80 Section 5: Wild Turkey PowerPoint Slide Notes The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. -
Than a Meal: the Turkey in History, Myth
More Than a Meal Abigail at United Poultry Concerns’ Thanksgiving Party Saturday, November 22, 1997. Photo: Barbara Davidson, The Washington Times, 11/27/97 More Than a Meal The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality Karen Davis, Ph.D. Lantern Books New York A Division of Booklight Inc. Lantern Books One Union Square West, Suite 201 New York, NY 10003 Copyright © Karen Davis, Ph.D. 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of Lantern Books. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data For Boris, who “almost got to be The real turkey inside of me.” From Boris, by Terry Kleeman and Marie Gleason Anne Shirley, 16-year-old star of “Anne of Green Gables” (RKO-Radio) on Thanksgiving Day, 1934 Photo: Underwood & Underwood, © 1988 Underwood Photo Archives, Ltd., San Francisco Table of Contents 1 Acknowledgments . .9 Introduction: Milton, Doris, and Some “Turkeys” in Recent American History . .11 1. A History of Image Problems: The Turkey as a Mock Figure of Speech and Symbol of Failure . .17 2. The Turkey By Many Other Names: Confusing Nomenclature and Species Identification Surrounding the Native American Bird . .25 3. A True Original Native of America . .33 4. Our Token of Festive Joy . .51 5. Why Do We Hate This Celebrated Bird? . .73 6. Rituals of Spectacular Humiliation: An Attempt to Make a Pathetic Situation Seem Funny . .99 7 8 More Than a Meal 7. -
Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 1983 Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants" (1983). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HYBRIDIZATION & ZOOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PHEASANTS PAUL A. JOHNSGARD The purpose of this paper is to infonn members of the W.P.A. of an unusual scientific use of the extent and significance of hybridization among pheasants (tribe Phasianini in the proposed classification of Johnsgard~ 1973). This has occasionally occurred naturally, as for example between such locally sympatric species pairs as the kalij (Lophura leucol11elana) and the silver pheasant (L. nycthelnera), but usually occurs "'accidentally" in captive birds, especially in the absence of conspecific mates. Rarely has it been specifically planned for scientific purposes, such as for obtaining genetic, morphological, or biochemical information on hybrid haemoglobins (Brush. 1967), trans ferins (Crozier, 1967), or immunoelectrophoretic comparisons of blood sera (Sato, Ishi and HiraI, 1967). The literature has been summarized by Gray (1958), Delacour (1977), and Rutgers and Norris (1970). Some of these alleged hybrids, especially those not involving other Galliformes, were inadequately doculnented, and in a few cases such as a supposed hybrid between domestic fowl (Gallus gal/us) and the lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) can be discounted. -
Ruffed Grouse
Ruffed Grouse Photo Courtesy of the Ruffed Grouse Society Introduction The ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) is North America’s most widely distributed game bird. As a very popular game species, the grouse is in the same family as the wild turkey, quail and pheasant. They range from Alaska to Georgia including 34 states and all the Canadian provinces. Historically in Indiana, its range included the forested regions of the state. Today the range is limited to the south central and southeastern 1/3 of the state in the southern hill country, with a few pockets in counties bordering Michigan. Ruffed grouse weigh between 1 and 1.5 pounds and grow to 17 inches in length with a 22-inch wingspan. They exhibit color phases with northern range birds being reddish-brown to gray while those in the southern part of their continental range, including Indiana, are red. History and Current Status Before settlement, grouse populations ranged throughout the hardwood region of the state. In areas where timber was permanently removed for farms, homes and towns grouse habitat has been lost. During the early1900’s, many farms in the south-central portion of Indiana were abandoned. As a result of this farm abandonment, the vegetation around old home sites and in the fallow fields grew through early plant succession stages. About the same time, the reforestation era began as abandoned farms reverted into public ownership under the management of state and federal natural resource agencies. By the 1950’s, natural succession, reforestation, and timber harvest management were beginning to form a myriad of early successional forest patches across a fairly contiguous forested landscape. -
Increasing Valley Quail in California
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA INCREASING VALLEY QUAIL IN CALIFORNIA JOHN T. EMLEN, JR. and BEN GLADING CALIFORNIA VALLEY QUAIL BULLETIN 695 November, 1945 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 3 Sources of information 3 Principles and methods of quail management 4 Establishing a population 4 Improving land for quail occupancy 5 Quail habitat 5 Characteristics of quail habitat 5 Quail habitats of California 8 Detecting habitat deficiencies 12 Laying the management plans 13 Improving cover conditions 15 Encouraging natural vegetation 16 Planting quail cover 18 Artificial and temporary shelters 24 Thinning cover 24 Improving food conditions 25 Quail foods 28 Food shortages 29 Encouraging natural food plants 29 Planting quail food 31 Artificial feeding 31 Improving water conditions 34 Water requirements 34 Providing water 34 Protecting quail populations 38 Predators 40 Ground carnivores 41 Eodents 42 Snakes 43 Hawks 43 Owls 45 Other birds 45 Ants 45 Diseases and parasites 46 Accidents 47 Hunting 48 Harvesting the quail crop 48 How much to harvest 48 How to harvest 49 How to record the harvest 50 Hunting privileges and rights 53 Literature cited 55 ; INCREASING VALLEY QUAIL IN CALIFORNIA1 JOHN T. EMLEN, Jr. 2 and BEN GLADING3 INTRODUCTION 4 The valley quail, California's state bird, is one of the most popular wild creatures on the farmlands, ranches, and waste areas where it is found. Almost everyone is attracted by its beauty of plumage, pleasing call notes, and friend- ly behavior. To the California sportsman it is the king of upland game birds, calling forth his best in alertness and marksmanship. -
Farmers Find the Balance Between Productive Cropland & Pheasant
1 888 overbag or 1-888-683-7224 SEPTEMBER/ OCTOBER/ NOVEMBER 2018 Affiliated with the National Wildlife Federation VOLUME 58, NUMBER 5 Inside this issue: Farmers Find the Balance between Productive Cropland & Pheasant Habitat Page 2 Re-printed with permission from SD Corn EXEC.DIRECTOR’S UPDATE This fall, thousands of hunters from all over the world will be Farmers can have both,” says Jeff Zimprich, South Dakota stepping into South Dakota fields to flush our famous state bird— State Conservationist. Page 3 the pheasant. It is a tradition that dates back to 1919, and one If you’ve never before considered how to create pheasant PRESIDENTS COLUMN that South Dakota corn farmers support in many ways today. habitat on your farm, the good news is that there are many Page 4 - 5 Recently, the South Dakota Game Fish & Parks (SDGFP) resources available to help. announced their 2018 statewide pheasant brood survey, which SDGFP offers free food plot brood mix for farmers to use on BOD - ZACHERY HUNKE indicated a 47 percent increase in pheasants per mile (PPM) their operations to encourage wildlife to come and eat. SDGFP Survey - Federal Funding over last year. This is a substantial increase as the state heads also offers a food plot program that pays $20 per acre on food into its 100th pheasant season. Duck, Goose, Spring plots that are 1-10 acres, including providing free corn and Turkey Season Dates Make Your Farm a Pheasant Haven sorghum seed for those food plots. Food plots must remain standing through winter until April 1 of the following year, and There are many factors that impact pheasant numbers from Page 6 be planted within half a mile of winter coverage to maximize year to year, including weather, predators and habitat. -
Migratory Birds
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Special Environmental Resource Concerns Migratory Birds Clean Air Act Criteria Pollutants Migratory Birds Clean Air Act Regional Visibility Degradation The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918, as amended, is the domestic law that affirms, or implements, the United States’ commitment to four international conventions (with Canada, Japan, Clean Water Act Mexico, and Russia) for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource. Executive Order (E.O.) 13186, Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, requires NRCS to consider the impacts of planned actions on migratory bird populations and habitats for all planning activities. The Bald and Coastal Zone their nests. Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940, as amended, also prohibits the take of bald and golden eagles and Management Areas What is it? Coral Reefs starling, feral pigeon, and resident game birds, such as pheasant, grouse, quail, and wild turkeys. Migratory birds are essentially all wild birds found in the United States, except the house sparrow, Cultural Resident game birds are managed separately by each State. A list of migratory birds is found in 50 CFR Resources activitiesPart 10. There and some are also noncommercial other requirements activities protecting involving certain bald or migratory golden eagles, birds. including The Bald their and Goldenfeathers Eagle or parts.Protection Act (BGEPA) provides protection to all Bald and Golden Eagles by prohibiting all commercial Endangered and Threatened Species Why is it important? act makes it unlawful, unless permitted by regulation, for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell, Environmental trade,The MBTA ship, fully import, protects or export all migratory any migratory birds andbird, their including parts feathers,(including parts, eggs, nests, nests, or and eggs. -
Revision of Molt and Plumage
The Auk 124(2):ART–XXX, 2007 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2007. Printed in USA. REVISION OF MOLT AND PLUMAGE TERMINOLOGY IN PTARMIGAN (PHASIANIDAE: LAGOPUS SPP.) BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS Peter Pyle1 The Institute for Bird Populations, P.O. Box 1346, Point Reyes Station, California 94956, USA Abstract.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt. A spring contour molt was signifi cantly later and more extensive in females than in males, a summer contour molt was signifi cantly earlier and more extensive in males than in females, and complete summer–fall wing and contour molts were statistically similar in timing between the sexes. Completeness of feather replacement, similarities between the sexes, and comparison of molts with those of related taxa indicate that the white winter plumage of ptarmigan should be considered the basic plumage, with shi s in hormonal and endocrinological cycles explaining diff erences in plumage coloration compared with those of other phasianids. Assignment of prealternate and pre- supplemental molts in ptarmigan necessitates the examination of molt evolution in Galloanseres. Using comparisons with Anserinae and Anatinae, I considered a novel interpretation: that molts in ptarmigan have evolved separately within each sex, and that the presupplemental and prealternate molts show sex-specifi c sequences within the defi nitive molt cycle. Received 13 June 2005, accepted 7 April 2006. Key words: evolution, Lagopus, molt, nomenclature, plumage, ptarmigan. Revision of Molt and Plumage Terminology in Ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.) Based on Evolutionary Considerations Rese.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt. -
THE MOLTS of YOUNG WILD and DOMESTIC TURKEYS by A
July, 1943 133 THE MOLTS OF YOUNG WILD AND DOMESTIC TURKEYS By A. STARKER LEOPOLD The molts and plumage sequences of many gallinaceous birds have by now been adequately described. Experiments with the domestic fowl have yielded some of our best information on the physiology of molt and feather growth. But the molts of turkeys (MeZeagris guZZ@zvo) have never been fully worked out, and since the family Meleagrididae is probably phylogenetically more or less isolated from other families in the order Galliformes, it is not surprising to find in turkeys certain peculiarities of molt which are not characteristic of the fowls in general. The main purpose of the present work is to describe the various molts and plumages of the young turkey from the time of hatching to the attainment of sexual maturity in the first winter. Notes on the annual and prenuptial molts of adult turkeys are added, but insufficient material is available to describe these in detail. In addition, within this speciessome differences in the molting procedures of young Eastern Wild Turkeys (M. g. &vest&) and domestic Bronze Turkeys are shown, and evidence as to the nature and origin of these molting differences is presented. This report is an outgrowth of a study of hybridization between wild and domestic turkeys in the Ozark region of southern Missouri. Data on molting have been collected through two seasons, 1941 and 1942. A considerable part of this material comes from a flock of confined turkeys, raised at Lost Trail Game Farm, Reynolds County, Mis- souri, for sale as wild stock suitable for releasing. -
Ringneck Pheasant Facts
Ringneck Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) Fact Sheet Ringneck Pheasants are Native to Asia and were first brought to the United States in 1881 and released to the Willamette Valley of Oregon Since that time Pheasants have been released throughout the United states and have become established where suitable habitat exists. In Rhode Island, Ringnecks became well established from releases in the early 1900’s when open grasslands and much open farmland existed in the state. At that time pheasant were found statewide and were abundant primarily in Washington, Bristol and Newport counties. Stocking of pheasants was practiced by the state since the early 1950’s as a way to supplement natural populations of the Gamebird for hunters using state gamelands. Today most hunted pheasant in Rhode Island are stocked birds. Loss of suitable habitats is the primary reason for the decline of native populations of pheasant in Rhode Island fueled by a decline in farmland and maturing of forest. Natural History and Behavior Male or cock pheasant are a large gamebird weighing 21/2 to 3 pounds and have bright reddish brown feathers with a blue green head, red face and white neck ring. Female or hen pheasant are smaller and colored tan and drab brown. Pheasants are ground loving birds with strong legs and quite capable of running to escape predators. In hunting them, they will often avoid flight unless forced by the hunter or his dog. Pheasants have short rounded wings that enable them to fly in short powerful bursts but not for long flight. A pheasant will erupt in flight and then glide to a protected cover of grasses or shrubs.