DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Transport Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Transport Feasibility Study Integrated Transport Feasibility Study ITCP-2017-08 Little Casterton (Eastern End of Village) Rutland County Council: Version? REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by A 19/12/2018 Draft RG NT 29/1/2019 (Date) Rutland County Council: Version? Contents Introduction ........................................................................................4 1 Site Description ..................................................................................4 2 Accident Data......................................................................................8 3 Speed Survey Data..............................................................................9 4 Options .............................................................................................12 5 Reccomendation...............................................................................13 Appendix A - Preliminar Scheme Drawings (Date) Introduction This feasibility study is to assess whether there is a speeding issue when vehicles enter Little Casterton travelling east to west, following concerns raised by the Parish Meeting regarding the speed vehicles and to determine if traffic calming measures are required. 1 Site Description Little Casterton is a small village situated between Great Casterton, Ryhall and Stamford. The approaches to Little Casterton from the west is national speed limit and the approach from the east is 40mph. The 40mph limit starts at the junction with the A6121 and finishes at the far eastern end of Little Casterton. The village is 30mph for its entire length. The road through Little Casterton can be used by vehicles to link the A6121 with the B1081. Vehicles travelling from Ryhall may use this road to access the B1081 to link onto the A1. 4 | P a g e Vehicles entering Little Casterton from the west are travelling from either Stamford along Little Casterton Road, or Great Casterton along Tolethorpe. Both of these roads are classified as C class roads. Both are rural lanes without any footpaths. The western approach has recently been upgraded to include new road markings, a chicane, and signs and buff coloured High friction surfacing, as illustrated below. The average speed at the western end of the village before the chicane was installed was 35mph (2015); following the installation of the chicane the average speed has reduced to 21mph (2017). (See Section 3 Speed Survey for further information). 5 | P a g e Vehicles entering Little Casterton from the east are travelling from the A6121, Ryhall, along Tolethorpe. There is only one road access with Tolethorpe between the A6121 and Little Casterton, Salters Lane. This road is used to access Tolethorpe Hall and links to Ryhall Road. The eastern approach to Little Casterton was upgraded at the same time as the western approach, to include a new village name plate, white lining and high friction surfacing. The signs have been placed approximately 100m east of the first house when entering Little Casterton from Ryhall. The village name plate includes the 30mph roundel and is on yellow backing. The 30mph roundel on the opposite side of the road does not have any backing. 6 | P a g e As shown in the image above, the Little Casterton sign is obstructed by vegetation. The Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 4 1states it is essential that drivers have an unobstructed view of traffic signs. The required visibility of a traffic sign will be depended upon the approaching speed. This traffic sign is for vehicles entering the 30mph limit from a 40mph limit, therefore drivers should have a clear visibility of the sign for 75m. It is important that sight lines are properly maintained so that the intended warning is not compromised. At this location the village name plate is not having the desired effect as it is obstructed by foliage. The Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 3 states “where a speed limit other than the national limit is in force, direction 11 (2) requires that repeater signs are provided at regular intervals along the road. However, this does not apply to a 30mph speed limit on a road with a system of carriageway lighting; in built-up areas it would be impracticable to place 30mph repeater signs on every road. To do so in some cases by not others would result in inconsistency and driver uncertainty. This is therefore prohibited by direction 11(4). Section 82 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 defines a road that has a system of street lighting (carriageway lighting in Scotland) as being a “restricted road” (see para 14.2). Section 81 specifies that the speed limit along such a road shall always be 30 mph unless an order has been made to impose another limit and remove the restricted road status. The presence of carriageway lighting therefore means that a road automatically has a speed limit of 30 mph with the lamps taking the place of repeater signs.”2 The speed limit through Little Casterton is 30mph. There is a series of street lights along Main Street, and therefore to comply with the Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 3, no repeater roundels have been installed through the village. 1 Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 4 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226765/traffic- signs-manual-chapter-04.pdf 2 Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 3 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223943/traffic- signs-manual-chapter-03.pdf 7 | P a g e 2 Accident Data There have been 2 recorded accidents through Little Casterton between 1/1/2008 and 30/9/2018. Accident 200802291 – V1 travelling north east towards Little Casterton at high speed collides with V2 turning right from Little Casterton Road. Both drivers were slightly injured Accident 201401043 – V1 reversing travelling south east from the Chantry Enters Main Road in front of V2 (motorcycle) travelling south west through Little Casterton. V2 swerves to avoid V1 and collides rear V2 parked ahead in carriageway. The motorcyclist was seriously injured. Neither of these accidents were in relation to the speed of vehicles through the village. 8 | P a g e 3 Speed Survey Speed survey western end of village prior to chicane being installed. The survey was carried out between 27/10/2015 and 4/11/2015. Average Speed 34mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 27/10/2015 35 33 36 28/10/2015 34 33 34 29/10/2015 34 32 35 30/10/2015 33 32 34 31/10/2015 35 33 36 01/11/2015 34 34 35 02/11/2015 33 32 34 03/11/2015 32 30 34 04/11/2015 33 32 33 85th percentile speed 39mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 27/10/2015 34 39 42 28/10/2015 35 39 40 29/10/2015 37 38 41 30/10/2015 37 37 39 31/10/2015 34 39 42 01/11/2015 36 40 40 02/11/2015 34 37 40 03/11/2015 34 37 39 04/11/2015 35 38 39 A speed survey was carried out at the same position once the chicane had been installed. The survey was carried out between 5/1/2017 and 18/1/2017. Average speed 21mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 05/01/2017 21 22 20 06/01/2017 21 22 20 07/01/2017 21 22 20 08/01/2017 22 23 20 09/01/2017 21 22 19 10/01/2017 21 22 20 11/01/2017 21 22 20 12/01/2017 21 22 20 13/01/2017 21 22 20 14/01/2017 21 22 20 15/01/2017 21 22 20 16/01/2017 20 21 19 17/01/2017 21 22 20 9 | P a g e 18/01/2017 21 22 20 85th percentile speed 24mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 05/01/2017 25 25 22 06/01/2017 24 25 22 07/01/2017 24 25 23 08/01/2017 25 26 23 09/01/2017 25 25 22 10/01/2017 24 25 23 11/01/2017 24 25 23 12/01/2017 24 25 22 13/01/2017 24 25 22 14/01/2017 24 25 22 15/01/2017 25 26 23 16/01/2017 24 24 22 17/01/2017 24 25 22 18/01/2017 24 25 22 This survey has demonstrated that the chicane has been effective at this location, by lowering the average speed and the 85th percentile by 40%. A speed survey was carried out at the far east of the village just inside the 30mph speed limit. This survey was carried out between 19/4/2017 and 26/4/2017. The approaching data is traffic entering the village and the receding data is traffic leaving the village towards Ryhall. 10 | P a g e Average Speed 34mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 19/04/2017 36 35 36 20/04/2017 35 33 36 21/04/2017 35 34 36 22/04/2017 34 34 34 23/04/2017 35 35 36 24/04/2017 34 33 36 25/04/2017 33 32 33 26/04/2017 33 31 35 85th percentile speed 40mph Bidirectional Approaching Receding 19/04/2017 41 40 42 20/04/2017 40 40 41 21/04/2017 40 40 41 22/04/2017 40 39 40 23/04/2017 41 40 42 24/04/2017 40 40 41 25/04/2017 39 38 40 26/04/2017 40 38 41 This speed survey has highlighted that vehicles entering and existing the village are going in excess of 30mph. The approach to the village is slightly down hill and straight which could cause vehicle speeds to be in excess of 40mph as they approach the 30mph limit. Time Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 Total Date Motorbikes/small Cars Small HGVs cars lorries/vehicles with trailers 19/04/2017 00-24h 12 1440 396 6 1854 20/04/2017 00-24h 21 2948 758 28 3755 21/04/2017 00-24h 27 3154 804 21 4006 22/04/2017 00-24h 15 2244 954 12 3225 23/04/2017 00-24h 25 1878 539 22 2464 24/04/2017 00-24h 114 2881 737 38 3770 25/04/2017 00-24h 114 2621 1145 44 3924 26/04/2017 00-24h 12 805 242 9 1068 Total 340 (1%) 17971 5575 (23%) 180 24066 (75%) (1%) Vehicles approaching Little Casterton from Ryhall are in excess of the speed limit including the tolerance allowed by The ACPO Speed Enforcement Guidance of +/- 2mph3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Casterton Parish Plan 2005
    A1 © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Rutland Council District Council Licence No. LA 100018056 With Special thanks to: 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Community and household 4. Transport and traffic 5. Crime and community safety 6. Sport and leisure 7. Youth 8. Village church 9. Education 10. Retail services 11. Farming and heritage 12. Conservation and the environment 13. Planning and development 14. Health and social services 15. Information and communication 16. Local councils 17. Conclusion 18. Action plan 3 INTRODUCTION PARISH PLANS Parish plans are part of the “Vital Villages” initiative of the Countryside Agency, run locally through the Rural Community Council (Leicestershire & Rutland). A Parish Plan should provide a picture of a village, identifying through consultation the concerns and needs of its residents. From the plan villages should identify actions to improve the village and the life of the community. The resulting Village Action Plan is then used to inform the County Council, through the Parish Council. Parish Plans have a statutory place in local government. GREAT CASTERTON PARISH PLAN Great Casterton’s Parish Plan started with a meeting of villagers in June 2002. There was particular interest because of a contentious planning decision imposed by the County Council on the village. The Community Development Officer for Rutland, Adele Stainsby, explained the purpose of the plan and the benefits for the village. A committee was formed, and a constitution drawn up. The Parish Council promised a small initial grant while an application for Countryside Agency funding was prepared. The money granted was to be balanced by the voluntary work of villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 418 HOUSING, ENGLAND The Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 Made - - - - 20th February 2004 Laid before Parliament 25th February 2004 Coming into force - - 17th March 2004 The First Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sections 157(1)(c) and 3(a) of the Housing Act 1985(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 17th March 2004. (2) In this Order “the Act” means the Housing Act 1985. Designated rural areas 2. The areas specified in the Schedule are designated as rural areas for the purposes of section 157 of the Act. Designated regions 3.—(1) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 1 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Forest of Dean. (2) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 2 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Rochford. (1) 1985 c.
    [Show full text]
  • 1873.] SHA~E--Oozi~S of ~ORT~A~E~O~SEIR~
    Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Liverpool on June 30, 2016 1873.] SHA~e--oozI~s OF ~ORT~A~e~O~SEIR~. 225 its glaciation to any general ice-cap radiating from the Pole. He thought that the ice-sheet was general over the northern part of the British Isles, and on a much larger scale than was usually admitted-- and that one of the obstacles to its recognition was the later glacia- tion along the valleys, which was more conspicuous than the older traces, and another the difficulty which some people had in ignoring the present coast-line. Mr. J. CLIFTOI~"WARD stated that in the northern parts of the Lake district he had found that the direction of the ice-flow must have been mainly to the north. The AVT~OR, in reply, remarked that in Greenland, whatever might theoretically be the case, ice is pushed for scores or hun- dreds of miles down into the sea, until it gets out of its depth, and eventually floats off as icebergs. He pointed out the correspondence of the main valleys of Ireland with glaciations on the surface of rocks from Scotland, and exhibited specimens and rubbings in illus- tration of various characters of weathering and wear from different natural causes. FEnRV~RY 5, 1873. Thomas Cheekley, Esq., 70 Lichfield Street, Walsall; John Mac- kenzie, Esq., Government Examiner of Coal-fields for New South Wales, Newcastle, N. S. W. ; John Ollenshaw Middleton, Esq., 1 Ebenezer Terrace, Plumstead Common, S.E. ; Walter Rowley, Esq., 74 Albion Street, Leeds; and George William Shrubsole, Esq., u toria Road, Chester, were elected Fellows of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 418 HOUSING, ENGLAND the Housing
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 418 HOUSING, ENGLAND The Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 Made - - - - 20th February 2004 Laid before Parliament 25th February 2004 Coming into force - - 17th March 2004 The First Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sections 157(1)(c) and 3(a) of the Housing Act 1985(a) hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 17th March 2004. (2) In this Order “the Act” means the Housing Act 1985. Designated rural areas 2. The areas specified in the Schedule are designated as rural areas for the purposes of section 157 of the Act. Designated regions 3.—(1) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 1 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Forest of Dean. (2) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 2 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Rochford. (3) In relation to a dwelling-house which is situated in a rural area designated by article 2 and listed in Part 3 of the Schedule, the designated region for the purposes of section 157(3) of the Act shall be the district of Rutland.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutland County Council Regulation 19: Local Plan 2018-2036
    Rutland County Council Local Plan 2018 –2036 2 RUTLAND LOCAL PLAN 2018 – 2036 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Market mousing within rural exception sites 62 Gypsies and travellers 63 2. SPATIAL PORTRAIT 11 Spatial characteristics 12 6. EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 65 Sustainable and vibrant communities 12 Sites for employment 68 Economy and infrastructure 14 The rural economy 70 Environment 15 Tourism 72 Waste management 15 Rutland Water 73 Minerals 15 Eyebrook reservoir 75 Issues to be addressed 16 Caravan and camping sites, lodges, log cabins, Minerals development 19 chalets and similar forms of self-serviced holiday accommodation 76 Development in neighbouring areas 19 Town centres and retailing 77 Duty to co-operate 20 7. SUSTAINING OUR ENVIRONMENT 83 3. VISION AND OBJECTIVES 21 Landscape character in the countryside 84 The vision 22 Place shaping 85 Strategic objectives 24 Delivering good design 86 Sustainable building and construction 90 4. SPATIAL STRATEGY AND LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT 27 The water environment and reducing the risk of flooding 92 Sustainable development principles 28 Pollution control 95 The spatial strategy for development 29 Low carbon energy generation 96 Planned limits of development 33 The natural environment 98 Development in the countryside 35 Blue and green infrastructure 100 Military bases and prisons 40 Protecting agricultural land 102 5. DELIVERING QUALITY NEW HOMES 43 Important open spaces and frontages 102 Meeting housing needs 44 Local green spaces 103 Identifying a housing buffer 44 Provision of new open space 104 Housing windfalls 45 The historic and cultural environment 107 Housing allocations 46 Advertisements 111 Meeting cross boundary housing need 53 Outdoor lighting 112 Housing density 54 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2012
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2012 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 7 Publications and guidance 10 THE REGISTER 12 Content and assessment criteria 12 Key to the entries 15 Heritage at risk entries by local planning authority 17 Derby, City of (UA) 19 Derbyshire 20 Leicester, City of (UA) 29 Leicestershire 31 Lincolnshire 37 Northamptonshire 60 Nottingham, City of (UA) 65 Nottinghamshire 66 Rutland (UA) 74 Despite the challenges of recession, the number of sites on the Heritage at Risk Register continues to fall. Excluding listed places of worship, for which the survey is still incomplete,1,150 assets have been removed for positive reasons since the Register was launched in 2008.The sites that remain at risk tend to be the more intractable ones where solutions are taking longer to implement. While the overall number of buildings at risk has fallen, the average conservation deficit for each property has increased from £260k (1999) to £370k (2012).We are also seeing a steady increase in the proportion of buildings that are capable of beneficial re-use – those that have become redundant not because of any fundamental lack of potential, but simply as the temporary victims of the current economic climate. This year’s Register for the East Midlands highlights just how The case of St Helen’s House in Derby shows how, even adaptable our strategies need to be for rescuing heritage at in these straitened times, private-sector investment can risk.We can report a successful major intervention from breathe new life into neglected buildings. After 11 years on the private sector this year, but generally progress is being the Register it is now being actively repaired, as our case made through a long-term, step-by-step approach that study explains.
    [Show full text]
  • RUTLAND. the Name~; of the Towns Are on the Top and Side, and the Square Where Both Meet Gives the Distance
    RUTLANDSHIRE. THlS is an inland county, and the smallest ir. England, being only about eighteen miles in length, fit its greatest breadth not more than sixteen, anrl its circumference fifty-eight; comprising 149 square miles, or 95,3fi0 acres, of which about 43,00i1 are undet· tillage. It is bounded on the north-west and south-west by Leicestershire; on the south and south -eal'lt by Northamptonshire, trom which it is separated by the t·ive:r WeJland; and the county of Lincoln is the boundary on ils east and north-eastern sideli.-This districc, at the time of the Roman invasion, formed a part of the territory of the Coritani: under the Romans it was included in the divhion called Flavia CCBsariensis: at Great Casterton was a Roman station, but antiquaries disagree concerning its 11ame. By the Saxons the district was comprised in the kingdom of Mercia. In Domesday• book Rote/and is mt:ntioned as being composed of the t\o\'o wapentakes of Alstoe and Martiosley; and the res~ of the county, at that periml, was included iu Northamplonshit·e. Rutland is first described as a dis­ tinct county in the fifth year of King John, at thr coronation of whose queen, lsabel, it was, amongst other lands, assigned in parliament for her dower. But few important historical events are connected with this county. In 1470, on the 27th of April, an army uf Lancaste1·ians was defeated by Edward IV, M Horn, witb a loss of thirteen thousand men, wht'n Sir Thomas Wells and Sir Thomas de Launde were taken pl'isoners, and shortly afterwards beheaded : this engagement has been jocularly styled 'the Battle of Lose-coat Field,' from the disper•ed fugitives having ca•t off their coats in order to be le~ encumbered.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 January 2020 63/20
    Rutland County Council telephone: 01572 722 577 Catmose fax: 01572 758 307 Oakham email: [email protected] Rutland web: www.rutland.gov.uk LE15 6HP 21 January 2020 63/20 - ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REGULATIONS REQUEST Dear Sir/Madam Your request for information has now been considered and the information requested is provided below. Request: Please could you provide all documentation relating to the installation of the two traffic calming measures on Tolethorpe, either side of the village of Little Casterton. One is located next to the junction with Little Casterton Road and the other near the junction of Salters Lane. In particular, I would like to see any risk assessments or safety assessments made prior to their installation, documentation outlining the justification for installation and the process that was undertaken in order to make the decision to install them. Response: Both of these chicanes were installed following requests by the Parish Council after they raised concerns relating to speeding traffic. Toll Bar end of Little Casterton – The scheme proposal was sent to the police on the 22nd January 2016, who responded with no objections to the scheme. The scheme was then installed in July 2016. The chicane at this end of the village has been successful in reducing vehicle speeds. Previously the average speed was 34mph and the 85th percentile was 39mph. Following the installation of the chicane the average speed reduced to 21mph and the 85th percentile to 24mph. Ryhall end of Little Casterton – This scheme was sent to the police, who responded with no objections to the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Ketton History Group Meeting 12 September 2019 a Lively And
    Ketton History Group Meeting 12 September 2019 A lively and enjoyable meeting where 11 members discussed a number of topics starting with a Public Health Report from 1949 for Ketton Rural District Council. Ketton Rural District Council whose offices were in Stamford, covered a number of villages including Clipsham, Essendine, Great Casterton, Ketton, Little Casterton, Pickworth, Ryhall, Tinwell and Tixover. The district had a growing population of over 2900 with 855 dwellings. The birth rate was above the average for England and Wales, and no children under 1 year of age had died. The infection rate was low. The ambulance service was provided by St Johns Ambulance on behalf of Rutland County Council. There were no council houses built during the year, but 4 were under construction in the village.There was a piped water supply in Ketton that was not universally available, but work was in hand to replace pumped water from boreholes. At this time there were two slaughter houses in Ketton. The sewage system was not yet in place and there were major concerns with the safe disposal of night soil. Collyweston had a recent Heritage weekend that was attended by some of our members. It was very interesting but despite a geophysical survey the site or size of Margaret Beaufort’s Collyweston Palace was not absolutely identified. A discussion on roads through Ketton and how they had changed over the years produced a number of ideas about the old routes including the suggestion that the road to Collyweston from Ketton had originally followed Sinc Lane through Aldgate.
    [Show full text]
  • Camphill Court, Little Casterton 3 Bedrooms, Barn Conversion Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 4BE OIEO £600,000 | for Sale
    Camphill Court, Little Casterton 3 Bedrooms, Barn Conversion Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 4BE OIEO £600,000 | For Sale Camphill Court, Little Casterton 3 Bedrooms, Barn Conversion Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 4BE oieo £600,000 | For Sale Features The Property Three bright and spacious bedrooms A deceptively spacious three/four barn conversion, it was converted from a large farm granary building in 1981 as part of an award winning development. With uninterrupted farmland views to the rear, the property En-suite to master along with a walk- makes a charming home with a lovely feel. Owned by the current vendor for 17 years, the dwelling has been in wardrobe and library/ dressing upgraded and reconfigured, with an enlarged principal bedroom suite that incorporates what is potentially a room fourth bedroom. It offers well-presented and elegant accommodation with delightful views over a private well stocked south-west facing garden and the open countryside beyond. Set back from the village's lane, the shared gravelled driveway leads to private courtyard and a detached double garage in front of the house, Dual aspect sitting room with a discreet entrance. Much loved as a principal home, the property would also lend itself as a second/holiday home or investment dwelling. Separate dining room with views over the landscape garden Location Breakfast kitchen Little Casterton is a Conservation Village 2 miles north of Stamford and about 2 miles from the A1. Stamford was England's first Conservation Area. It is an active and vibrant town, within which there is good Utility and downstairs cloakroom provision for both state and private education for all age groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 March 2019 Dear Councillor, STAMFORD TOWN COUNCIL
    Town Hall, St. Mary’s Hill, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 2DR 26 March 2019 Dear Councillor, STAMFORD TOWN COUNCIL – NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby summoned to attend a Planning Committee Meeting to be held in the Town Hall, Stamford, on Tuesday 02 April 2019 at 6.00pm for the purpose of considering and passing such resolutions as may be necessary with respect of each item on the agenda attached. Yours sincerely, Town Clerk (For information only to those Members not on the Committee) Members: Town Mayor (Ex Officio) Councillor Steve Carroll (Chairman) Councillor Breda Griffin (Vice Chairman) Councillor David Dorson Councillor Marion Pitt Councillor Town Clerk: Mrs. P Stuart-Mogg E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 01780 753808 Website: www.stamfordtowncouncil.gov.uk Town Hall, St. Mary’s Hill, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 2DR AGENDA FOR A MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE to be held on TUESDAY 02 April 2019 AT 6.00PM in the TOWN HALL, ST. MARY’S HILL, STAMFORD Members of the Public and Press are welcome to attend. As part of this process residents of Stamford may speak for up to 3 minutes to address the Committee. Items may be noted by the Chairman for consideration during the formal business of the Meeting. 1. Apologies for absence 2. To receive any Declarations of Interest 3. To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 05 March 2019 4. Planning Applications received from South Kesteven District Council (as attached) NB- Please note all these applications will be viewed electronically, should you wish to view a paper copy for more details then please visit the SKDC Maiden Lane office.
    [Show full text]