Áur X: at HAY X5
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1164 EDA 2016 v. Kathleen Granahan Kane Appellant áUR x: a,. HAY t X5 ?016 PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT EASTERN DISTRICT I hereby certify that this 2nd day of May, 2016, I have served the attached document(s) to the persons on the date(¡) and in the manner(s) stated below, which service satisfies the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 121: Service Served: Amil Michael Minora Service Method: Email Email: amil.minora @gmail.com Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 570 -961 -1616 Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane Served: Amil Michael Minora Service Method: eService Email: amil.minora @gmail.com Service Date: Address: 700 Vine Street Scranton, PA 18510 Phone: 570 --96 -1 -1616 Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane Served: Assistant Counsel Seth C. Farber Service Method: Email Email: sfarber @winston.com Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 212- 294 -6700 Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane PACFile 1001 Page 1 of 3 Print Date: 5/2/2016 11:33 am IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT (Continued) Served: Gerald L. Shargel Service Method: Email Email: sfarber @winston.com Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 212- 294 -2637 Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane Served: Kevin R. Steele Service Method: Email Email: ksteele @montcopa.org Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 610- 278 -3098 Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Served: Robert Martin Falin Service Method: Email Email: rfalin @montcopa.org Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 610- 278 -3102 Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Served: Robert Martin Falin Service Method: eService Email: rfalin @montcopa.org Service Date: Address: Montgomery County Courthouse P.O. Box 311 Norristown, PA 19404 -0311 Phone: 610- 278 -3104 Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Served: Ross Mitchell Kramer Service Method: Email Email: sfarber @winston.com Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: -- Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane PACFile 1001 Page 2 of 3 Print Date: 5/2/2016 11 :33 am IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT (Continued) Courtesy Copy Served: Stan J. Caterbone Service Method: Email Email: stancaterbone @gmail.com Service Date: 5/2/2016 Address: Phone: 717 -669 -2163 Pro Se: Amicus Stan J. Caterbone (Signatur :: of Person Serving) Person Serving: Attorney Registration No: Law Firm: Address: PACFile 1001 Page 3 of 3 Print Date: 5/2/2016 11133 am : o Report Date: 05/02/2016 Submission Status: Not Submitted Filing Package Tracking Number: WSPRED00082210 Filing Type: Ancillary Description: Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. ED Total Fees Due: Pre -Submission Status ® Select Cases ® Select Filing Type Establish the Participants ® Establish the Counsel ® Upload Filing Documents ® Record Service ® Final Verification Case Information Intermediate Court Cases Docket Number: 1164 EDA 2016 (Lead) Case Caption: Com. v. Kane, K. Case Status: Active Event Track: Appeal Program Status: Filers Filer Name: IFP Status: Role: Counsel: Current Filings in Progress Filing Name: Amicus Curiae Brief Required: Yes Filing Fee: $0.00 Document Name: Amicus Curiae Brief.pdf Upload Date/Time: 5/2/2016 11:19AM PACFile 2100 1 Printed: 5/2/2016 11:32:11 AM Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, Registered in the State of Pennsylvania Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT IN RE: Case NO. 1164 EDA 2016 Montgomery Courte Case No. Docket No. 8423 -15: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : v. KATHLEEN KANE AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL) MOTION TO QUASH BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT: AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case. The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of "SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster Count4li District Attorney's Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005, and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvaniai. Most of which have been dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991. This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at- large. The matters presented in this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's (Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The Attorney General has been quoted as saying she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written extensively about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an intrview with Brian Taff of WPVI on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying "Everybody Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 1 of 48 Thursday, April 28, :t 016 makes mistakes. I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and I wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I think that's what my legacy will show." In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following "This story was pierpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box ". It's a tenure of power that evolved frorin the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!" In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wish0 this said court to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions against the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. In addition attached are supporting, documents to advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT. These documents are attached as EXHIBITS. Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f= Lancaster -County -The- i CIA -by -Stan- Caterbone- 091125- 169.html In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and stated the following "Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why the y would not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys ". I also have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. W parted ways in an amicable fashion." Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 2 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016 The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated "Dear M Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we. will keep your information in our files ". These are attached as EXHIBITS. Date: April 28, 2016 St., ley ' . Cater. ' e, Pro Se Freedom From vert Harassment and Surveillance Advanced Medi. Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 www. amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com scaterbone(@live.com (717) 669-2163 Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 3 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016 HAD LANCASTER COUNTY (Pennsylvania) LOST IT'S SOVEREIGNTY BEFORE IT Lost- IT'S SOUL ?1 Authored in May of 1998 Í "Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. And crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression. ". by Robert F Kennedy In 1987 This Plaintiff (Stan J. Caterbone) Had Unjustly Lost His Freedoms, His Rights, And His Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Justice. The following report (most identities purposely omitted from this version) is an amazingly true and factual account of an extraordinarily bizarre tragedy that has turned one man's life into arts eleven (11)2 year free fall into "Dante's Hell ". On the surface, this is a story of a victim (Stan J. Caterbone) struggling to seek the, truth, but in reality, the evidence will conclude that this is a victim, literally, held hostage by v rtue of his truth.